Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5184_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of the Anatomy, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging…
101
of contrast agents, making it a comfortable option for patients [5, 10, 11].
3.1.2 Limitations
1. Cost: MRI is an expensive imaging modality compared to conventional radiographs or CT scans, making it less accessible in some healthcare settings.
2. Time-consuming: MRI scans can take longer than conventional radiographs or CT scans, which can be a limiting factor in emergency situations.
3. Claustrophobia: Some patients may experi­ence claustrophobia during MRI scans, which can limit the use of this imaging modality in some patients.
4. Metallic implants: Patients with metallic implants, such as dental implants or pacemak­ers, may not be eligible for MRI scans due to safety concerns [8, 10, 11].
3.2 Current Advancements inMRI
forTMJ Injury Evaluation
Advancements in MRI technology have improved the accuracy and efciency of TMJ injury evalua­tion. One such advancement is the use of high­resolution MRI, which provides detailed images of the TMJ structures, including the articular disc, ligaments, and muscles. High-resolution MRI is particularly useful in the evaluation of small or subtle injuries, which may be missed on conven­tional MRI scans. Another advancement is the use of functional MRI (fMRI), which can provide information on the functional status of the TMJ. fMRI can evaluate the TMJ during active mouth opening and closing, providing information on the movement patterns and muscle activation dur­ing these movements. This information can be useful in the assessment of TMJ dysfunction and in the planning of TMJ surgeries [26, 27].
3.2.1 TMJ Dislocation
TMJ dislocation occurs when the mandible (lower jawbone) becomes dislocated from the temporal bone (skull bone) that forms the joint. This can occur due to a variety of factors, includ-
ing trauma, overuse, or underlying structural abnormalities. The symptoms of TMJ dislocation can range from mild discomfort to severe pain and functional impairment [18, 20, 21].
MRI can be a valuable tool for evaluating TMJ dislocation, as it provides detailed images of the joint and surrounding structures. These images can help healthcare professionals identify the underly­ing causes of the dislocation, as well as any struc­tural abnormalities or damage to the joint that may be contributing to the problem [22, 23, 28].
3.2.2 Causes ofTMJ Dislocation
TMJ dislocation can occur due to a variety of fac­tors, including trauma, overuse, or underlying structural abnormalities.
Trauma: Trauma to the jaw or head can cause the mandibular condyle to become dislocated from the temporal bone. This can occur due to a blow to the face, a fall, or a car accident, among other things.
Overuse: Overuse of the TMJ can also lead to dislocation. This can occur due to excessive chewing or grinding of the teeth, or as a result of certain habits such as nail biting or clenching the jaw [18, 22, 23].
Structural abnormalities: Underlying struc­tural abnormalities can also contribute to TMJ dislocation. These can include deformities of the mandibular condyle or temporal bone, as well as abnormalities of the articular disc or joint capsule [29].
Symptoms
The symptoms of TMJ dislocation can vary depending on the severity and underlying cause of the problem. Some common symptoms include [23, 27, 30]:
1. Pain or discomfort in the jaw joint or sur-
rounding areas
2. Limited range of motion or difculty opening
and closing the mouth
3. Clicking, popping, or grating sounds when
moving the jaw
4. Locking of the jaw in an open or closed
position
5. Headaches
102
F. A. Chagas-Neto et al.
3.2.3 TMJ Fractures
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) fractures are relatively uncommon but can be a signicant source of pain and dysfunction. They can occur due to a variety of factors, including trauma, overuse, or underlying structural abnormalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninva­sive diagnostic tool that can be used to evaluate TMJ fractures and aid in treatment planning [26].
Trauma: Trauma to the jaw or head can cause fractures to the mandibular condyle or other structures of the TMJ.This can occur due to a blow to the face, a fall, or a car accident, among other things.
Overuse: Overuse of the TMJ can also lead to fractures. This can occur due to excessive chew­ing or grinding of the teeth, or because of certain habits such as nail biting or clenching the jaw.
Structural abnormalities: Underlying struc­tural abnormalities can also contribute to TMJ fractures. These can include deformities of the mandibular condyle or temporal bone, as well as abnormalities of the articular disc or joint capsule [27, 31].
Symptoms
The symptoms of TMJ fractures can vary depend­ing on the severity and underlying cause of the problem. Some common symptoms include [27,
30]:
1. Pain or discomfort in the jaw joint or sur-
rounding areas
2. Swelling or tenderness around the TMJ
3. Limited range of motion or difculty opening
and closing the mouth
4. Clicking, popping, or grating sounds when
moving the jaw
5. Locking of the jaw in an open or closed
position
3.2.4 MRI intheEvaluation ofTMJ
Fractures
MRI can be a valuable tool for evaluating TMJ fractures, as it provides detailed images of the joint and surrounding structures. These images can help healthcare professionals identify the location and extent of the fracture, as well as any
associated soft tissue injuries. MRI can also help differentiate TMJ fractures from other causes of jaw pain and dysfunction, such as arthritis or muscle strain [26, 31].
4 Internal Derangements
andDegeneration
Internal derangement (ID) refers to a joint mal­function that disrupts smooth joint function, caused by abnormal interaction of the articular disc, condyle, and articular eminence. Clinical features of ID include articular pain and noises. The most common cause of ID is disc displace­ment, but not all displaced discs are associated with derangement, and not all derangements are caused by disc displacement. Loose bodies, joint effusion, and adhesions in the joint can also cause derangement. Surprisingly, up to 34% of asymp­tomatic volunteers may have anterior disc dis­placement, and 23% of patients with derangement may have normal disc position [3234].
Approximately 80% of patients referred for diagnostic imaging of the TMJ demonstrate some form of disc displacement in most large MRI series. MRI is the preferred imaging method for diagnosing ID, with a 95% accuracy rate for assessing the disc position and shape, and a 93% accuracy rate for assessing osseous changes [3335].
4.1 Temporomandibular Joint
Developmental Disorders
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) developmental disorders are a group of conditions that affect the growth and function of the TMJ.The TMJ is the joint that connects the lower jaw to the skull and allows for movements such as chewing, speak­ing, and yawning. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive imaging technique that uses a strong magnetic eld and radio waves to produce detailed images of the soft tissues of the body. MRI has an important role in the diagnosis and management of TMJ developmental disor­ders [20, 26].
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of the Anatomy, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging…
103
MRI can provide detailed images of the TMJ and its surrounding structures, including the bones, muscles, ligaments, and cartilage. This allows for the identication of abnormalities or changes in the TMJ that may be indicative of a developmental dis­order. For example, MRI can reveal the presence of a disc displacement, which occurs when the disc that cushions the TMJ is displaced from its normal position. This condition is commonly associated with TMJ pain and dysfunction [28, 36].
MRI can also be used to assess the growth and development of the TMJ in children. This is par­ticularly important in cases of developmental dis­orders such as condylar hyperplasia, which is a condition where there is an overgrowth of the mandibular condyle, the part of the jaw that articu­lates with the skull. MRI can provide information about the size and shape of the condyle, as well as any changes in the surrounding tissues [32, 33].
In addition, MRI can be used to monitor the progression of TMJ developmental disorders over time. This is important in cases where con­servative treatments such as physical therapy and medications are being used. By tracking changes in the TMJ over time, clinicians can assess the effectiveness of treatment and make adjustments as necessary [36].
Overall, MRI plays a valuable role in the diag­nosis and management of TMJ developmental dis­orders. Its ability to provide detailed images of the TMJ and its surrounding structures allows for the identication of abnormalities and changes that may be indicative of a developmental disorder. MRI can also be used to assess the growth and development of the TMJ in children and monitor the progression of TMJ developmental disorders over time. With its noninvasive nature and high level of detail, MRI is an important tool in the man­agement of TMJ developmental disorders [12, 34].
4.2 Disc Displacement
Disc displacement is a common condition of the TMJ that can cause signicant pain and dysfunc­tion. It occurs when the articular disc that sepa­rates the condyle and the fossa of the TMJ moves out of position. The displacement can be anterior,
medial, lateral, or posterior, and it can be associ­ated with derangement of the joint [18, 27, 35].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the pre­ferred imaging modality for the diagnosis of disc displacement, as it provides excellent soft tissue contrast and can accurately depict the position, shape, and integrity of the articular disc and other joint structures. Several studies have demon­strated the high diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the evaluation of disc displacement, with reported sensitivity and specicity rates of up to 100% and 96%, respectively [27, 37].
The clinical signicance of disc displacement is still a matter of debate, as not all displaced discs are symptomatic, and the association between disc displacement and joint pain is not always clear. Some studies have suggested that disc displacement alone may not be sufcient to cause pain and that other factors, such as joint loading and inammation, may play a role in the development of symptoms [29, 35].
Disc displacement can be categorized into two subtypes: anterior displacement with reduction (Fig. 10b) or anterior displacement with no reduction (Fig.11), depending on whether a nor­mal relationship between the condyle and the disc is restored during mouth opening [38].
The extent of disc displacement can be classi­ed as complete or partial. Complete displace­ment occurs when the entire mediolateral dimension of the disc is displaced, while partial displacement refers to the displacement of either the medial or the lateral portion of the disc. Partial disc displacement, commonly observed in anterior displacement with reduction, often involves the anterior displacement of the lateral part of the disc, while the medial part remains in its normal position, referred to as rotational disc displacement. The precise mechanism underly­ing disc displacement remains unclear; however, trauma resulting in injury to the posterior disc attachment is considered the most probable cause. Unenhanced MRI is the preferred imaging modality for assessing ID of the TMJ [20, 28].
In the early stages of ID, the disc initially main­tains its normal shape, but over time, it undergoes deformations characterized by thickening of the posterior band and thinning of the anterior band.
104
ab
F. A. Chagas-Neto et al.
Fig. 11 Anterior displacement with no reduction. (a) Sagittal proton density-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the closed-mouth position demonstrates anterior displacement of the disc (arrow) related to the articular eminence (a) and anterior to the mandibular con-
This results in the disc assuming a biconvex, tear­drop-shaped, or rounded appearance. As long as the disc remains positioned on top of the condyle during mouth opening, it maintains a normal biconcave shape. Consequently, the presence of an irregular and rounded disc typically indicates disc
dyle (c). (b) Sagittal proton density-weighted MRI in the open-mouth position demonstrates no reduction of the disc (arrow) between the articular eminence (a) and the mandibular condyle (c)
displacement is a rare occurrence. Once again, these rotational and sideways displacements can be classied as complete or partial and can occur with or without disc reduction. Among these pat­terns, anterolateral displacement is the most com­monly observed [24, 39].
disease. Additional MRI ndings suggestive of disc disease include disc attening, a decrease in the normal intermediate to high signal intensity of
4.3 Pseudo-Disc
the disc, and the presence of tears or perforations in the chronic stage [38, 39].
Posterior disc displacement is an uncommon occurrence (Fig.12), representing only a small per­centage of all disc displacements, ranging from 0.01 to 0.001%. The primary clinical manifestation is the sudden onset of a locked jaw in the open position. The use of MRI is valuable in diagnosing this con­dition as it reveals the displacement of the posterior band beyond the 1 o’clock position on the clock
Pseudo-disc (Fig.13) is a term used to describe the presence of a band-like structure with low signal intensity, replacing the typically bright sig­nal of the posterior disc attachment. It is observed in certain patients who have anteriorly displaced discs and is believed to be an adaptive reaction to the displacement, resulting from connective tis­sue thickening and hyalinization within the pos-
terior disc attachment [37, 40]. face. It is essential to review the patient’s clinical information before interpreting the images to avoid mistaking a previous posterior disc plication for an
4.4 Stuck Disc
acquired posterior disc displacement [38, 39].
Rotational displacements encompass antero­lateral and anteromedial disc displacements, whereas sideways displacements include pure lateral and medial displacements. Isolated lateral
The condition known as the “stuck disc” refers to a pathological state where the disc remains immobile in relation to the glenoid fossa and the articular eminence. This condition can be
ab
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of the Anatomy, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging…
105
Fig. 12 Posterior displacement with no reduction. (a) Sagittal proton density-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the closed-mouth position demonstrates posterior displacement of the disc (arrow) related to the articular eminence (a) and anterior to the mandibular con-
dyle (c). (b) Sagittal proton density-weighted MRI in the open-mouth position demonstrates no reduction of the disc (arrow) between the articular eminence (a) and the mandibular condyle (c)
can lead to pain and joint dysfunction due to lim­ited condylar translation. To accurately diagnose this condition, it is important to image the tem­poromandibular joint (TMJ) in both open- and closed-mouth positions. Sagittal oblique cine imaging is particularly valuable in assessing the stuck disc [40, 41].
4.5 Perforated Disc
Disc perforation (Fig. 14) occurs in approxi­mately 5–15% of cases involving displaced joints and deranged discs. This occurrence is more fre-
Fig. 13 Pseudo-disc. Sagittal proton density-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the closed-mouth position demonstrates thickening of the posterior attach­ments (arrowheads) superior to the mandibular condyle (c), seen as “pseudo-disc.” Articular disc (arrow) is dis­placed anteriorly
observed regardless of whether the mouth is open or closed and is likely caused by adhesions. It may occur with or without disc displacement and
quent in patients with anterior disc nonreducing (ADNR) conditions compared to anterior disc reducing (ADR) conditions, and it is commonly observed in individuals with advanced arthrosis. The prevalence of disc perforation is higher in women than in men, particularly among individ­uals over 80years of age. MRI ndings associ­ated with disc perforation include disc deformity (100%), disc displacement (81%), condylar bony changes (68%), joint effusion (23%), and non­visualization of the temporal posterior attach-
106
ab
F. A. Chagas-Neto et al.
Fig. 14 Perforated disc. (a) Sagittal proton density- weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the closed-mouth position demonstrates mild disc perforation (arrows) in relation to osteophyte of the mandibular con-
dyle (c). (b) Sagittal proton density-weighted MRI in the closed-mouth position demonstrates extensive disc perfo­ration (arrows) with luxation of the disc fragments. Also, there is osseous edema in the mandibular condyle (c)
ment (TPA) of the disc (65–68%). Both conventional and MR arthrograms can aid in diagnosing disc perforation by demonstrating opacication of both joint compartments after injecting a contrast agent into a single lower compartment. To investigate suspected disc per­foration, a fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI can be obtained in the sagittal and coronal planes. Additionally, the absence of stretching or straightening of the posterior temporal disc attachment during mouth opening also suggests the presence of a disc perforation [4042].
4.6 Joint Eusion andLoose
Bodies
Joint effusion refers to an abnormal accumula­tion of uid within the joint space and is fre­quently observed in symptomatic patients (Fig. 15). In asymptomatic individuals, a small amount of joint uid can be present. The preva­lence of effusion is higher in painful joints com­pared to non-painful joints. Although not all patients with joint pain have effusion, those with large effusions often experience pain and disc displacement [40, 43, 44].
Fig. 15 Joint effusion. Sagittal proton density-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the open-mouth position demonstrates uidlike signal within the articular space, compatible with joint effusion (arrowheads). Also, there is anterior displacement of the disc (arrow) in rela­tion to the articular eminence (a) and the mandibular con­dyle (c)
For evaluating joint effusion, T2-weighted MR sequences are considered the most effective. Early-stage effusions typically surround the ante­rior band, while larger effusions can occupy both
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of the Anatomy, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging…
107
the superior and inferior joint spaces. A substan­tial effusion can provide valuable diagnostic information, as it delineates the disc and may even reveal disc perforation and retrodiscal tissue, cre­ating an “arthrography effect.” Gadolinium­enhanced T1-weighted imaging can be useful in differentiating a plain joint effusion from synovial proliferation. In patients with inammatory arthropathies accompanied by synovial prolifera­tion, the proliferating synovium exhibits enhance­ment, whereas the effusion does not [9, 43, 45].
Loose bodies within a synovial joint can be classied as primary or secondary synovial chon­dromatosis (Fig. 16). The primary type occurs when there is spontaneous cartilaginous metapla­sia in the synovium, while the secondary type is characterized by the incorporation of osseocarti­laginous loose bodies within the synovium, often in the presence of degenerative joint disease. Typical clinical symptoms associated with loose bodies include pain, swelling around the ear, restricted jaw movement, clicking or popping sounds, and deviation of the jaw to one side dur­ing mouth opening. Panoramic radiographs of the TMJ may or may not reveal the presence of loose
bodies. However, high-resolution CT or MRI imaging can effectively detect small loose bodies within the TMJ space [4446].
4.7 Thickening ofLateral Pterygoid Muscle Attachment (Double-Disc Sign)
The specic role of the lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM) in TMJ function is still a subject of debate, although it is believed to contribute to generating side-to-side and protrusive jaw forces. Electromyographic studies have shown increased activity in the lower attachment of the LPM in patients with TMJ internal derangement. Various morphological changes in the superior and infe­rior portions of the LPM have been observed on MRI, including hypertrophy, atrophy, and con­tractures. These changes have been found to have a signicant association with clinical symptoms such as pain or restricted jaw opening in patients with anterior disc nonreducing TMJ conditions. It is suggested that there is a notable connection between anterior disc displacement and attach­ment of the superior LPM solely to the disc, rather than to the condyle. Radiologists interpret­ing imaging should be cautious not to mistake a thickened inferior LPM for an anteriorly displaced disc (Fig.17), a phenomenon known as the “double-disc sign” [16, 17, 20].
Fig. 16 Loose body. Sagittal proton density-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the open-mouth position demonstrates a loose body (arrowheads) within the joint effusion. Also, there is anterior displacement of the disc (arrow) in relation to the articular eminence (a) and the mandibular condyle (c)
4.8 Osteochondritis Dissecans andAvascular Necrosis
Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the mandibular condyle share similar pathological characteristics and likely rep­resent different stages of the same underlying con­dition. Common clinical features of OCD/AVN include pain and impaired joint function. Pain is typically localized to the joint area and along the distribution of the trigeminal nerve’s third divi­sion. Other symptoms may include headache, ear­ache, and muscle spasms in the masticatory muscles. These symptoms can occur with or with­out limitations in joint movement [42, 47].
108
Fig. 17 Double-disc sign (thickening of the lateral pterygoid muscle). Sagittal proton density-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the closed­mouth position demonstrates anterior displacement of the disc (arrow). The thickened lateral pterygoid muscle near the mandibular condylar (c) attachment appears as linear hypointense structure (arrowheads) inferior to the disc in the same orientation giving the appearance of “double disc”
a b
F. A. Chagas-Neto et al.
Fig. 18 Avascular necrosis. Sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the closed-mouth position in proton density-weighted (a) and on T1-weighted (b) images demonstrates high marrow signal intensity in proton den­sity image and low signal intensity in T1-weighted image
MRI is the preferred imaging modality for eval­uating OCD/AVN of the mandibular condyle. In cases of AVN, there is a decrease in marrow signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences. T2-weighted sequences exhibit variable signal characteristics depending on the stage of AVN (Fig. 18). Early­stage AVN consistently shows high signal inten­sity on T2-weighted images, while acute OCD (Fig.19) typically displays a centrally hypointense fragment surrounded by a zone of higher signal
within the condylar head. Also, there is an area of low signal intensity in both sequences, suggestive of subchon­dral fracture (arrowheads). Articular eminence (a) has normal signal intensity on both sequences for comparison
intensity on both T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences. Although MRI has a sensitivity of 78% and specicity of 84% in diagnosing AVN, the positive predictive value is only 54% due to simi­lar MRI appearances seen in condylar sclerosis secondary to advanced degenerative changes in the TMJ. Radiological changes associated with OCD and AVN of the mandibular condyle often involve joint effusion and internal derangement of the disc [42, 47, 48].
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of the Anatomy, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging…
lates beyond the boundaries of the anterior attachment of the TMJ capsule. The condyle becomes trapped along the anterior slope of the articular eminence, primarily due to biomechani­cal constraints related to masticatory muscle activity [1].
In acute cases, imaging studies are typically unnecessary since the open lock can be diag­nosed based on clinical signs and a relevant his­tory of wide jaw opening or trauma. However, in chronic cases, MRI can provide valuable infor­mation about the height and steepness of the articular eminences, as well as the shape and position of the disc [15, 23].
109
Fig. 19 Osteochondritis dissecans. Sagittal proton density- weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the closed-mouth position demonstrates a tiny bone frag­ment (arrowhead) at the superior aspect of the mandibular condyle (c). It can be noted that there is intermediate/high signal intensity surrounding the bone fragment
4.9 Hypermobility
Patients with a hypermobile temporomandibular joint (TMJ) may have trouble closing their jaw (referred to as an “open lock”) following wide jaw opening. This occurs when the condyle trans-
4.10 Ankylosis
Ankylosis of the TMJ can occur when brous adhesions or bony fusion restricts the movement of the jaw (Fig.20). This condition may develop because of previous infection, trauma, or surgery or in individuals with juvenile idiopathic arthritis or bid mandibular condyles. MR arthrography is a valuable tool for assessing brous adhesions, while a three-dimensional CT scan is necessary for surgical planning when bony fusion is sus­pected [11, 49].
110
ab
F. A. Chagas-Neto et al.
Fig. 20 Ankylosis. Coronal (a) and sagittal reformation (b) of multislice computed tomography (CT) demonstrates brous ankylosis of the left temporomandibular joint (black arrows)
5 TMJ Tumors andTumorlike
Conditions
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is one of the most complex joints in the human body. It is responsible for the movement of the lower jaw and plays an important role in mastication, speech, and facial expression. TMJ disorders are a common cause of orofacial pain and dysfunc­tion. Tumors and tumorlike conditions of the TMJ are relatively rare, but they can cause sig­nicant morbidity and mortality. This section aims to provide an overview of MRI role in the most common tumors and tumorlike conditions of the TMJ [12].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non­invasive imaging modality that is commonly used in the evaluation of tumors and tumorlike condi­tions of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). MRI provides excellent soft tissue contrast and multiplanar imaging capabilities, which make it a valuable tool in the diagnosis and management of these conditions [32].
5.1 MR Features ofTumorlike Conditions
MRI is useful in the evaluation of tumorlike con­ditions of the TMJ, such as synovial chondroma­tosis, pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS), and osteochondroma. In synovial chondromato­sis, MRI typically shows multiple nodular lesions within the synovial membrane and joint space. These nodules are hyperintense on T2-weighted images and hypointense on T1-weighted images. In PVNS, MRI shows diffuse synovial thickening with hypointense areas representing hemosiderin deposition. In osteochondroma, MRI shows a bony protuberance with a cartilaginous cap that is hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyper­intense on T2-weighted images [46].
5.2 MR Features ofTumors
MRI is also useful in the evaluation of tumors of the TMJ, such as chondrosarcoma, osteosar-