Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5760_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
334
Chapter 5 · Extracranial Cerebral Arteries
5
. Fig. 5.30 a Recanalization after internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion (thin patent lumen with slow, pulsatile ow). The external carotid artery
(ECA) takes a more supercial course. b When insonation conditions are poor and acoustic shadowing from calcied plaques prevents thorough evaluation, ECA occlusion may be mistaken for ICA occlusion. To avoid this error, it is important to follow the occluded artery cranially: in the example, the distal portion of the occluded ECA is relled by a collateral (ECA KOL). When the ICA is occluded, distal relling only occurs in indi­viduals with a persistent primitive hypoglossal artery (PPHA). Another pitfall to be borne in mind is that the postocclusive ECA waveform becomes more like that from the ICA (internalization; b). In this situation, the temporal tap maneuver can help conrm the identity of the ECA (.
Fig.5.6)
reported incidence is 0.027–0.26% (Yilmaz et al. 1995). Autopsy data suggest that patients with a PPHA typically have other variants of vascular anatomy (Vasovic etal. 2008). A common association is a hypoplastic or aplastic vertebral artery with the main supply to the posterior circulation com­ing from the ICA via the PPHA (Elhammady et al. 2007). is is why patients with high-grade carotid stenosis may show disturbed perfusion of the posterior circulation (Kanazawa etal. 2008; Yuasa etal. 2005). In very rare cases of total or subtotal ICA occlusion, a PPHA supplies blood to the distal ICA (. Fig.5.31). In 2007, Ehammady etal. published what they claimed to be the rst report of a PPHA with retro­grade ow in a patient with high-grade proximal ICA steno­sis. Much earlier, however, in 1992, Widmann and Sumpio reported a patient with ow in the distal ICA and absence of ow proximally, which was initially misdiagnosed as pseudo­occlusion. Intraoperatively, they found proximal ICA occlu­sion and distal relling via a PPHA.Published data on the frequency of PPHAs (incidentally) detected during carotid artery ultrasound examinations are not available. In a retro­spective analysis of 6300 patients who underwent carotid duplex ultrasound for suspected carotid stenosis or other indications, the author identied PPHA in 0.08% of cases. More than half of the PPHAs (0.05%) showed retrograde ow because they functioned as collaterals in proximal ICA occlu­sion. It is expected that, with awareness of this collateral path­way, more PPHAs will be identied by color duplex ultrasound in the future (Schäberle 2013). However, the sonographic detectability of PPHA strongly depends on the insonation conditions and is impaired in severe atherosclerosis with cal­cied plaques. erefore, the frequency is likely to vary with the composition of the patient population investigated.
A PPHA with normal ow typically has a thin caliber (. Fig. 5.31d, e) and is more dicult to detect and dier­entiate from ECA branches than a dilated PPHA recruited
as a collateral in high-grade ICA stenosis or occlusion (. Fig.5.64b–d (Atlas)).
Sonoanatomically, a PPHA arises from the ICA slightly cranial to the bulb and runs to the skull base dorsomedial to the ICA.It courses through the hypoglossal canal to join the vertebrobasilar system, where aneurysmal dilatation may occur.
In addition, there may be compression of the hypoglossal nerve, and iatrogenic injury of the PPHA during carotid end­arterectomy (CEA), like high-grade carotid stenosis, can cause disturbed perfusion of the posterior circulation in patients with a hypoplastic vertebral artery.
5.6.1.4 Postoperative Follow-Up
5.6.1.4.1 Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA)
ree operative techniques are available for carotid endarter­ectomy (CEA) in patients with carotid artery stenosis (. Fig.5.32).
In patients with a wide carotid bulb, CEA can be per­formed with direct closure of the arteriotomy. A possible complication of this procedure is the inadvertent creation of a relative stenosis compared with the distal ICA lumen by pulling the vessel wall too tight.
is complication can be prevented by interposing a
synthetic or venous patch
aer CEA to compensate for the relative narrowing that may be created by primary closure. Too wide a patch, on the other hand, will lead to ectasia or even aneurysm with development of turbulent ow.
In eversion CEA, the ICA is transected at its origin, and the outer layer over the stenosing plaque-intima cylinder is everted and dissected along the vessel until the intima appears fairly normal again. At this point the cylinder is tran­sected, and the outer wall layer is re-inserted into the com­mon carotid artery (CCA).
de
5.6 · Ultrasound Criteria, Measurement Parameters, andDiagnostic Role
a
335
5
b
. Fig. 5.31 Persistent primitive hypoglossal artery (PPHA) a Patient with atrial brillation and absolute arrhythmia and sonomorpholic ndings
pointing to embolic internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. Sonographic evaluation shows a normal common carotid artery (CCA) and bifurca­tion, while no ow is detectable in the ICA just distal to the bifurcation. The distal extracranial ICA segment has monphasic ow and normal ICA pulsatility (PSV of 90cm/s). The patient subsequently underwent angiography. The rst angiogram conrms ICA occlusion with distal relling via a PPHA, which ensures adequate blood ow in the aected ICA territory. In this situation, the contralateral ICA or posterior cerebral circulation is not required to provide compensatory blood ow to the brain. The second angiogram shows the late phase of relling of the distal ICA via the PPHA. b Dilated PPHA with retrograde ow (red, toward transducer, A.P) with a PSV of 125cm/s (the occluded segment of the ICA is seen in the right half of the image). c The patent distal ICA has a normal-diameter lumen and a ow volume similar to an unobstructed ICA (PSV of 95cm/s and normal pulsatility). These ndings conrm good perfusion via the dilated PPHA.Delayed systolic upslope (acceleration time), compared with the unaected contralateral side, is the only sign of postocclusive ow in the waveform from the distal ICA.Based on these ultrasound ndings, surgery is unnecessary or even harmful. In addition, duplex ultrasound identied a compensatory increase in blood ow in the vertebral artery (PSV of 110cm/s; not shown). d, e Normal ICA with PPHA.The example illustrates the incidendal detection of a PPHA, seen as a thin artery aris­ing from the unobstruced extracranial ICA (d, with ICA waveform). The ow direction is orthograde (blue), as in the ICA (e, with PPHA waveform). Normally, the ICA does not give o extracranial branches. Color reversal (from red to blue) is due to a change in ow direction relative to the transducer (curved array)
c
336
Chapter 5 · Extracranial Cerebral Arteries
. Fig. 5.32a–d Surgical and
interventional restoration of patency in internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. a Carotid endarter­ectomy (CEA) with direct closure.
b CEA with patch angioplasty. c Eversion CEA. d Percutaneous
transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with carotid artery stenting (CAS)
5
Each CEA technique alters postoperative carotid bulb anatomy in a specic way: while CEA with patch insertion leads to an unphysiologically wide carotid bulb, the other two CEA techniques reduce bulb width to the normal ICA diam­eter. As a result of the loss of normal bulb anatomy, the cor­relations that exist in the native ICA no longer apply, and the two methods of carotid stenosis grading (local versus distal) yield the same results. e PSV ratio (intrastenotic to preste­notic PSV in the ICA) therefore oen allows reliable grading of recurrent stenosis aer CEA (which tends to involve the segment distal to the bifurcation or the distal end of the seg­ment operated on). However, in the follow-up of patients aer CEA with patch insertion, the hemodynamic eects of the caliber variation at the distal patch end must be taken into account in interpreting the sonographic ndings.
Moreover, each CEA technique is prone to specic com-
plications
that must be carefully ruled out by postoperative ultrasonography. e complications of the primary closure technique, apart from relative narrowing as an early compli­cation, include an intimal step or an intimal ap. Elongation of the ICA can lead to kinking with development of a stenosis unless the excessive segment is resected.
Patch angioplasty is susceptible to thrombotic deposits, but these may resolve, even aer days, following treatment with heparin and platelet aggregation inhibitors (see
. Fig.5.78 (Atlas)). However, such thrombotic deposits can
also induce transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or early occlu­sion. Aneurysmal dilatation due to excessive correction gives rise to turbulent ow. Suture aneurysms primarily occur in association with infection and aer insertion of a synthetic patch. At the junction of the patch with the distal ICA, detach­ment of the intima can lead to the same complications as direct closure. Use of a venous patch can give rise to the for­mation of a true aneurysm due to the physiologically weaker venous wall. Over time, patients may develop recurrent ste­nosis. Hence, in the follow-up examination, special attention must be paid to intimal hyperplasia in the suture area.
Suture line complications are rare in eversion CEA, while step formation at the transition to the native intima is some­what more common (. Table5.14).
. Table 5.14 Sonographic evaluation for postoperative
complications after carotid endarterectomy (CEA)
CEA technique
CEA with direct closure
CEA with patch angioplasty
Eversion CEA Retraction of suture line,
Evaluation of operative site
Relative stenosis, recurrent or residual stenosis
Thrombotic deposits in the patch area without/ with hemodynamically signicant stenosis, suture aneurysm, ectasia, infection, recurrent stenosis
suture aneurysm, recurrent stenosis
Evaluation of distal ICA
Intimal step, intimal ap, intimal dissection, kinking, intimal hyperplasia
Intimal step, intimal ap, intimal dissection, kinking, intimal hyperplasia
Intimal ap, intimal step, intimal dissection, intimal hyperplasia
e specic complications of the dierent CEA tech­niques must be borne in mind when performing the manda­tory postoperative duplex scan. Postoperative sonography is impaired by scattering through edema, which may aect both B-mode and spectral Doppler imaging. e use of a lower-frequency transducer (5 or even 3.5 MHz) yields B-mode images with a poorer resolution but oen facilitates both the identication of the target artery within the edema­tous tissue and spectral Doppler measurement for exclusion of early occlusion, residual stenosis, or thrombotic deposits.
e development of recurrent stenosis has been inves­tigated in numerous studies with postoperative follow-up by duplex ultrasound (. Fig.5.33). However, the studies do not address the problem of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the above-described early complications under the poorer postoperative insonation conditions (. Figs.5.78 and 5.79 (Atlas)). Clinical experience indicates that patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) aer CEA with patch
5.6 · Ultrasound Criteria, Measurement Parameters, andDiagnostic Role
. Fig. 5.33 Moderate recurrent
carotid stenosis in transverse and longitudinal orientation (caused by a ap-like, oating structure, indicated by arrow in the 2 longitudinal views) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with patch angioplasty (seen in the near wall). The PSV is 180cm/s
337
5
closure oen have thrombotic deposits on the synthetic patch, even if no hemodynamic eect is apparent in the Dop­pler waveform. e deposits may completely resolve within days to weeks under heparin and antiplatelet therapy. No studies have investigated these complications in terms of their possible impact on patch selection. Color duplex ultra­sound allows dierentiation of intimal dissection and intimal aps, which are oen seen as hyperechoic oating structures in the bloodstream.
e ow pattern in a suture aneurysm is the same as in a pseudoaneurysm. To-and-fro ow can be demonstrated by color duplex or spectral Doppler (see 7 Sect. 2.1.6.3 and
. Figs.5.70 and 5.71 (both Atlas)).
If semiclosed endarterectomy of the external carotid artery (ECA) is performed, intimal aps or dissection may give rise to stenosis or occlusion. ey rarely have functional or clinical signicance but must be considered in the dier­ential diagnosis when examining the ICA.
e intimal step at the proximal end of the operated on segment in the CCA is oen highly conspicuous in the B-mode image but has no clinical or functional relevance as the step attens out in the direction of the owing blood.
Recurrent stenosis within the rst 12months of surgery
is due to neointimal proliferation (unless the operation has been technically inadequate). Recurrence seen aer 2years is attributable to the progression of atherosclerosis. Based on the follow-up data from more than 160 studies including over 62,000 patients, the average restenosis rate is 6% (range, 0–50%) (Kallmayer etal. 2014). Plaque echogenicity (mean GSM) is lower than in primary ICA stenosis (
. Fig.5.35e)
without this indicating a higher stroke risk (Pavela et al.
2014). e incidence of symptomatic recurrent carotid ste­nosis is 2% with the recurrence rate being markedly higher aer CEA with direct closure than aer patch angioplasty (12% versus 5%). Overall, approx. 20% of all stenoses seen aer CEA are accounted for by residual stenoses, 50% develop within 2years, and 30% occur later. Long-term follow-up of 380 patients for 16years revealed restenosis rates of 5.8%,
9.9%, 13.9%, and 23.4% aer 1, 3, 5, and 10years, respec­tively; however, only 2.1% of patients were found to have high-grade recurrent stenosis (> 80%) (Mattos et al. 1993; Roth etal. 1999). In the follow-up aer CEA, sonographic evaluation of the unoperated side with identication of pro­gressive atherosclerosis appears to be more relevant than
imaging of the side where CEA was performed. It has been proposed that routine duplex surveillance in the rst 6months is not required when an intraoperative completion study has conrmed the technical adequacy of the repair (Pross etal. 2001;
. Fig.5.34). However, experience seems to
indicate that it is common to detect thrombotic deposits in patients with postoperative TIAs despite normal intraopera­tive ndings, especially when a synthetic patch has been used. Such deposits respond well to heparin treatment (fol­low- up within 4 weeks is recommended).
5.6.1.4.2 Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)
Following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with carotid artery stenting (CAS), ultrasound depicts the stent as a mesh-like structure. A diagnostic Doppler wave­form is dicult to obtain from the stented carotid segment during the rst days, presumably because the stent is not yet incorporated. Aer this initial period, the scanning condi­tions are the same as before stent placement. Stents are also prone to thrombotic deposits, which may cause stenosis but will recede aer initiation of treatment with heparin and platelet antiaggregators. e distal stent end is especially prone to recurrent stenosis (. Figs. 5.35, 5.82 (Atlas), and
5.83 (Atlas)).
Scientic evidence suggests that higher blood ow veloc­ity cutos are needed for postinterventional surveillance of patients aer CAS (Stanziale etal. 2005). Loss of compliance
of the arterial wall
aer stent insertion results in higher nor­mal velocities; thus, it has been proposed that a PSV of up to 150 or 180cm/s should be considered normal in a stented carotid artery segment (Chahwan etal. 2007; Lal etal. 2004).
5.6.1.4.3 Scientic Discrepancies Regarding
Restenosis Grading After CAS
Several studies investigating restenosis aer carotid artery stenting (CAS) proposed peak systolic velocity (PSV) thresh­olds of 150–240cm/s for >50% stenosis and 300–450cm/s for >70% (to 80%) stenosis (Alexander etal. 2007; AbuRahma etal. 2008; Lal etal. 2008; Stanziale etal. 2005; Kwon etal. 2007; Zhou etal. 2008; Chi etal. 2007). Most of these studies assessed stenosis severity using North American Symptom­atic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) methodology. When European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) methodology is used, the PSV cutos for identifying equivalent degrees of
338
Chapter 5 · Extracranial Cerebral Arteries
. Fig. 5.34 Diagnostic
algorithm for the follow-up of patients after carotid endarter­ectomy (CEA) based on NASCET grading of restenosis. CAS carotid artery stenting, TEA thromboen­darterectomy
Duplex follow-up after surgical repair within one week of surgery and at 6 months
<30% restenosis
30–69% restenosis 70–99% restenosis Occlusion
5
Follow-up at 12-month intervals (& contralateral carotid!)
Follow-up at 6-month intervals
Early restenosis (<2 years): intimal hyperplasia
Focal Diffuse
Angiography with
CAS
Follow-up only of contralateral carotid
Late restenosis (>2 years): atherosclerosis
Angiography
Reoperation: TEA & patch, graft interposition
stenosis should be approx. one third lower because a given PSV indicates a higher-grade local stenosis (ECST) com­pared with the distal degree (NASCET). e second issue to be considered is that dierent velocity criteria apply when grading in-stent restenosis compared with restenosis in a nonstented carotid artery. Two studies investigating carotid restenosis proposed cutos of 180 and 200cm/s for >50% restenosis (NASCET criteria) in unstented carotid arteries versus 220 and 240 cm/s for in-stent restenosis (Lal et al. 2008; Chi etal. 2007). According to these studies, the cuto for in-stent restenosis is only approx. 10–20% higher than for restenosis in native carotid arteries.
e need for modied velocity criteria in stented carotid arteries was also conrmed by AbuRahma etal. (2008), who conducted a ROC analysis to determine cutos for dierent degrees of in-stent carotid restenosis. In this study, a PSV threshold of 154cm/s for >30% stenosis (by NASCET crite­ria) showed 99% sensitivity and 89% specicity. e optimal PSV cuto for >50% stenosis was 224cm/s, which had 99% sensitivity, 90% specicity, 99% positive predictive value, 90% negative predictive value, and 98% overall accuracy. e ideal cuto for >80% stenosis was 325cm/s with 100%
sensitivity, 99% specicity, and 99% accuracy. e diagnostic accuracy of absolute PSV was compared with end-diastolic velocity (EDV) and also with the ratio of PSV in the stented ICA to the PSV in the CCA.is comparison showed that PSV provided the most reliable criterion for sonographic stenosis grading in 144 patients in whom the results were compared with angiography. Nineteen of the patients had >50% in-stent restenosis. Large PSV ranges were found for dierent categories of stenosis (dened by angiography, NASCET criteria): range of 142–256cm/s with a mean PSV of 178/s for 30–50% stenosis (n=38); 201–408cm/s with a mean PSV of 278cm/s for 50–80% stenosis (n= 11); and 58–613cm/s with a mean of 403cm/s for 80–99% stenosis (n=8).
A minor limitation of published ultrasound studies of carotid in-stent restenosis is the small number of cases inves­tigated. Although some study populations include more than 100 patients with duplex ultrasound aer CAS (
. Table5.15),
ROC analysis was usually performed in subsets of 10–20 patients who underwent angiography because they had reste­nosis of at least 50% and were candidates for possible reinter­vention.
ab
cd
5.6 · Ultrasound Criteria, Measurement Parameters, andDiagnostic Role
339
5
Moreover, most studies use CT angiography (or magnetic resonance imaging) as the method of reference for color duplex imaging rather than the gold standard of angiography in two or three planes, neglecting the inherent methodologi­cal limitations of CT angiography, especially in the carotid bifurcation. is introduces an additional inaccuracy into the ROC analysis of sonographic velocity thresholds. Most investigators use catheter-based angiography only in patients undergoing repeat PTA for higher-grade stenosis; as a result, the gold standard is available only for these cases.
In the discussion of velocity thresholds for quantifying carotid in-stent restenosis compared with restenosis of non­stented arteries, it was initially overlooked that the approxi­mately one third higher cutos proposed in studies using NASCET methodology could not simply be converted to
ICA
1
3
ECA
2
6
equivalent cutos for in-stent restenosis grading using ECST methodology. Instead, it turned out that PSV cutos for diag­nosing in-stent restenosis based on ECST methodology should only be slightly higher than cutos for nonstented arteries (see
. Table 5.9). Higher blood ow velocities in
stented carotid segments may be attributable to several fac­tors. One is rigidity of the stented arterial wall, which results in higher PSV within the stent; however, it has also been shown that pulsatility varies with the stent device used. At the same time, it is hard to believe that the dierence in rigid­ity between a stented segment and an atherosclerotic, calci­ed ICA with higher-grade stenosis is so large as to explain a 30% dierence in PSV or to justify a 30% higher PSV cuto for in-stent restenosis. e lumen reduction by the stent does not explain this dierence either.
4
5
CCA
. Fig. 5.35 a Common sites of early and late complications and progressive atherosclerosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA): 1 intimal ap;
2recurrent stenosis due to plaque; 3 neointimal proliferation with recurrent stenosis; 4 postoperative external carotid artery (ECA) occlusion; 5 damage from clamping, step, plaque progression at proximal end of CEA; 6 suture aneurysm. b Early and late complications after carotid artery
stenting (CAS): neointimal hyperplasia; recurrent plaque with stenosis; ECA stenosis, when ICA stent crosses the ECA origin. (For stent dislocation, see . Fig.5.85 (Atlas)). c Moderate recurrent stensosis caused by intimal ap (arrow) seen at follow-up 1week after CEA (PSV of 150cm/s). d Recurrent stenosis caused by neointimal proliferation 8months after CEA. e Recurrent stenosis caused by plaque (P) due to progressive athero­sclerosis is often identied by echolucency without this indicating an increased risk of embolism (images obtained 6years after CEA). The Doppler waveform conrms high-grade recurrent stenosis with a PSV of 350cm/c. f Suture aneurysm. This patient presented with local swelling due to a large hematoma after CEA.The ultrasound examination reveals to-and-fro ow (with systolic (s) inow and diastolic outow (d) in the waveform from the site of suture line rupture identied by color duplex ultrasound. A suture line rupture should always alert the examiner to the possibility of infection as an underlying cause
340
Chapter 5 · Extracranial Cerebral Arteries
¬Patch®
¬Patch®
5
e
f
. Fig. 5.35 (continued)
. Table 5.15 Dzsound criteria for in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS)
Author, year No. PSV (cm/s) ICA/CCA ratio
> 50% > 70% > 80% > 50% > 70% > 80%
AbuRahma 2008 144/19 224 325 3.4 4.5
Lal 2008 189/29 220 340 2.7 4.1
Stanziale 2005 118/19 225 350 2.5 4.75
Peterson 2005 170
Chi 2007 13 240 450 2.45 4.3
Wei Zhou 2008 237/22 300 4
Kwon 2007 200 2.5
No.: total number of patients with CAS examined with duplex ultrasound/number of patients who underwent angiography or CT angiography CCA common carotid artery, ICA internal carotid artery, PSV peak systolic velocity
5.6.1.4.4 Stenosis Grading Based onthe
Continuity Equation
As recurrent stenosis at the proximal stent end (i.e., the junction between the common carotid artery (CCA) and the stent) is less common than in-stent restenosis or stenosis at the distal stent end (. Fig.5.37b), abrupt doubling of peak
systolic velocity (PSV)
ment– which is well established for diagnosing stenosis in peripheral arteries– can be used for the diagnosis of hemo­dynamically relevant in-stent restenosis (50% stenosis) in the carotid system as well (. Figs.5.36, 5.37, and 5.38). When the increase in intrastenotic PSV is determined using the
in a continuous Doppler measure-
5.6 · Ultrasound Criteria, Measurement Parameters, andDiagnostic Role
341
. Fig. 5.36 Patient with restenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Continuous spectral Doppler imaging revealed a focal increase in peak
systolic velocity (PSV) in the stent from 100cm/s in the prestenotic segment to 210cm/s in the stenosis. For this measurement, the spectral Doppler waveform was recorded by moving the transducer along the artery in a cranial direction in order to continuously shift the sample vol­ume from the prestenotic to the intrastenotic segment of the stent, while maintaining a constant Doppler angle (the segment along which the Doppler tracing was recorded is indicated by >>…<< in the B-mode image). The pre- and intrastenotic PSVs give a PSV ratio of 2, consistent with 50% in-stent restenosis. Restenosis in this case is not caused by stent dislocation but by the rigidity of the snugly tting stent: elastic recoil of the short, stenotic, brace-like plaque at the origin of the ICA (identied by hyperechogenicity) results in conical tapering of the stent. The example illustrates how PSV increases as the cross-sectional area decreases along the tapering stent. Although the stent is patent, increasing ow resistance in the narrowing portion of the stent causes hemodynamically relevant stenosis. This type of stenosis is more dicult to identify by angiography
5
PSV ratio, this velocity should be related to PSV just upstream of the in-stent restenosis rather than to PSV in the common CCA.However, in some studies (AbuRahma etal. 2008; Lal et al. 2008; Stanziale et al. 2005; Peterson etal. 2005; Chi et al. 2007), investigators determined the CCA/ ICA PSV ratio for diagnosing ICA in-stent restenosis, pro­posing cuto ratios of 2.5–3.4 for >50% stenosis and 4–4.5 for >70% or >80% stenosis. While calculation of the intraste­notic PSV increase in relation to the PSV in the CCA accounts for systemic eects on PSV as well as compensa­tory ow increases in patients with contralateral steno­occlusive ICA lesions, in-stent restenosis grading using the CCA/ICA PSV ratio is subject to the same pitfalls as in the native arteries: PSV in the CCA varies with the volume ow rate in the external carotid artery (ECA), which increases when the ECA is recruited as a collateral. is problem can be avoided by measuring the prestenotic PSV for calculation of the velocity ratio in the proximal ICA, which is oen pos­sible, as in-stent restenosis in the carotid territory tends to occur upstream of the origin of the ECA. Using the PSV from the proximal ICA is more reliable because it is not inuenced by other factors such as hemodynamic eects of branching arteries, diameter variations, or dierences in vessel wall rigidity. Ideally, the prestenotic PSV for calcula­tion of the velocity ratio should be measured within the stent to eliminate possible eects of the stent on vessel lumen width or wall rigidity. Use of the PSV ratio also avoids the well-established problems that arise from the wide variation in absolute PSVs measured for a given angiographic degree of stenosis and the fact that this parameter is aected by a
variety of other factors (AbuRahma etal. 2008). In a compi­lation and analysis of an as yet small number of patients, the author identied nine patients with higher- grade carotid in­stent restenosis, classied as >75% stenosis based on the continuity equation and a cuto ratio of intra- to prestenotic PSV in the ICA of >4. Absolute intrastenotic PSV in these nine patients ranged from 230–455cm/s (
. Figs.5.36, 5.37,
and 5.38 and . Figs. 5.81, 5.82, and 5.83 (Atlas)). All nine cases were conrmed by subsequent angiography. Stenosis grading using this PSV ratio is dierent from both ESCT and NASCET methodology (local versus distal carotid stenosis grading) but is methodologically closer to the latter. Dier­ences in diameter between the carotid bulb and the distal ICA are eliminated when a stent is in place. In this articial situation of a relatively constant ICA diameter, it follows from the continuity equation that a PSV ratio of 2 or dou­bling of PSV indicates 50% cross-sectional area reduction, while a ratio of 4 corresponds to 75% area reduction in the stent. A 75% cross-sectional area reduction corresponds to 50% diameter reduction when caused by circumferential ste­nosis. Conversely, 50% diameter reduction caused by an eccentric plaque results in a smaller cross-sectional area reduction, and therefore the resulting stenosis has a less severe hemodynamic eect and causes a smaller increase in PSV (
. Fig. 5.27). While causing less severe stenosis, an
eccentric plaque is thicker and exposed to greater shear stress, which increases the risk of embolism (. Fig.5.15a). is risk must be taken into consideration as well when assessing the therapeutic relevance of carotid in-stent restenosis.
342
Chapter 5 · Extracranial Cerebral Arteries
5
a
ICA
Intrastenotic PSV
Prestenotic PSV
ECA
Stent
b
. Fig. 5.37 a High-grade carotid in-stent restenosis at the distal stent end with an intrastenotic-to-prestenotic PSV ratio of >4 (calculated
from intrastenotic PSV of 414cm/s and prestenotic PSV of 97.6cm/s– the latter measured in the stent just distal to the ECA origin). The site of PSV increase is identied by moving the transducer cranially while obtaining a continuous spectral tracing at a constant Doppler angle (curved­array transducer, tilted to achieve good Doppler angle, 54° in the example) (see . restenosis with a PSV ratio>4 but with an absolute intrastenotic PSV of only 268cm/s). The angiogram (right) shows high-grade ICA in-stent restenosis (projection plane). b Diagram illustrating the author’s approach to grading carotid in-stent restenosis based on the continuity equation (see . Fig. 1.44 and 7 Sect. 1.2.3). This approach avoids the confusion regarding distal versus local stenosis grading (NASCET versus ECST) and exploits the fact that a stented carotid artery segment has a fairly constant diameter and that most in-stent restenoses occur within the stent far­ther away from the ECA origin or even at the distal stent end. The drawing shows the sites where prestenotic and intrastenotic PSV for calculation of the PSV ratio should be measured. This is the most accurate method for grading in-stent restenosis of the ICA (see . Figs.5.81, 5.82, and 5.83 (all Atlas))
CCA
PSV ratio for grading in-stent ICA stenosis
In-stent restenosis
Fig.5.83b (Atlas) for another example of high-grade in-stent
B-ow ultrasound (see . Fig.5.86 (Atlas)) and contrast-
enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) (Clevert et al. 2011) (see
7 Sect. 5.6.1.1.8) allow very accurate morphologic grading of
carotid in-stent stenosis. e diagnostic performance is com­parable to angiography, while B-ow imaging aords higher spatial resolution.
5.6.1.4.5 Stent Dislocation
While ultrasound provides no valid diagnostic information in patients with dislocation of an aortic stent, it is well suited to evaluate patients with suspected dislocation of an ICA stent. In the carotid territory, duplex ultrasound with a high­frequency transducer provides highly resolved information
5.6 · Ultrasound Criteria, Measurement Parameters, andDiagnostic Role
. Fig. 5.38a, b Illustration
of stenosis grading in a native common carotid artery (CCA) and stented CCA using the continuity equation. Study-based velocity cutos have not been dened for grading CCA stenosis. a In this patient, >75% stenosis is diag­nosed based on a peak systolic velocity (PSV) ratio>4 (calculated from PSVs of 264 and 61cm/s). b Following stent implantation, the patient developed in-stent restenosis due to elastic recoil of the plaque; restenosis is classied as moderate based on a PSV ratio of 2.7 (PSVs: 158/58cm/s) (see
. Figs.5.36 and 5.37 for how
to obtain a continuous spectral Doppler tracing for PSV measure­ment along the stented arterial segment). The angiogram con­rms in-stent restenosis (arrow) of the CCA
343
5
on blood ow within the stent or between the stent and the wall of the native artery (see . Fig.5.85 (Atlas)). e ndings can be corroborated by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and the time-motion mode provides additional information on pressure-related stent movement within the arterial lumen. A diameter mismatch between the artery and an uncoated stent can result in blood ow between the stent and the native arterial wall. Here, ultrasound is superior to angiography because, following opacication, the thin blood­stream outside the stent lumen is dicult to dierentiate from ow within the lumen.
Straightening of an elongated and tortuous ICA by a rigid stent can lead to kinking distally. Color duplex imaging allows identication of kinks and associated stenosis as well as any (postural) reduction in cerebral perfusion, which may occur in patients with bilateral carotid stents.

5.6.2 Vertebral Arteries

5.6.2.1 Stenosis
e origin of the vertebral artery may be dicult to evaluate by color duplex imaging when a kink or loop is present. Aris-
ing at a right angle from the subclavian artery, the vertebral artery exhibits disturbed ow at its origin, which must not be mistaken for stenosis. e curved course at the origin may lead to Doppler angle uncertainty and an unreliable ow velocity calculation for stenosis grading.
Virtually all atherosclerotic stenoses of the vertebral artery occur at its origin. Since there is wide variation in peak systolic velocities and in the ow volume of the vertebral arter­ies and there may be marked dierences in caliber between the two vertebral arteries (hyperplasia, hypoplasia), no absolute cuto value (as for the carotid arteries) can be dened to dis­criminate between low-grade and hemodynamically signi­cant stenosis (. Figs.5.39 and 5.40). erefore, indirect criteria such as turbulent ow at the origin or markedly reduced pul­satility compared with the contralateral artery can be consid­ered but should be interpreted with caution. Vertebral artery stenosis is suggested when PSV at the origin is at least 50% higher than in more distal segments. Grading of stenosis at the vertebral artery origin is dicult for several reasons:
5 Absolute PSV cuto: unreliable due to interindividual
variation and variable perfusion
5 Comparison with contralateral side: precluded due to
variability or possible hypoplasia