Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5760_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
274
aV
Chapter 4 · Arteriovenous Fistulas
PSV 3.7m/s and 0.9m/s
R3
Pp
fA
R1
Pc
A
C
dA
R2
pA
4
a b c
. Fig.4.5 a Diagram of factors aecting peripheral perfusion after creation of an AV stula (for details see text) (fA feeding artery, Pc central
arterial pressure, dA draining artery, Pp peripheral arterial perfusion pressure, pA peripheral arteries, R1 resistance of feeding artery, R2 resistance of peripheral vessels, R3 total resistance of anastomosed vessel, A anastomosis, aV anastomosed vessel, C collateral) (From Scholz 1998). b, c High-ow AV stula with a markedly increased peak systolic velocity (PSV) of >350cm/s in a long segment of the brachial artery feeding the stula. The increase is nonfocal, making stenosis unlikely. The Doppler waveform from the brachial artery (c) shows ow without manual compression of the AV stula (left) and with compression (right). During compression, ow in the brachial artery becomes more pulsatile, and a normal PSV of 100cm/s is measured
forearm and hand. Severe dialysis access steal syndrome (DASS) can cause retrograde ow from the arteries supplying the hand or an increased ow in the ulnar artery if the stula is supplied by the arteries of the palmar arch. Hypoperfusion of the ngers or even of the whole hand may ensue. e risk of ischemia in the ngers or the hand increases with the severity of PAOD and the magnitude of stula ow.
A drop in peripheral perfusion pressure below the critical threshold with pain and vital risks to nger areas is depen­dent on several factors (. Fig.4.5):
5 Systemic blood pressure 5 Atherosclerosis of peripheral arteries (micro- and
macroangiopathy) with increased resistance distal to the
venous anastomosis
5 Peripheral resistance distal to the venous anastomosis 5 Collateralization around the stula 5 Width of anastomosis 5 Steal phenomena (DASS) 5 Venous outow resistance 5 Proximal stenosis of feeding artery
Macroangiopathic causes of ischemia of the stula-bearing arm and excessive blood ow through the stula can be diag­nosed by duplex ultrasound. e color duplex examination for peripheral ischemia focuses on identifying sclerotic ste­notic lesions of the arm arteries proximal and distal to the arteriovenous anastomosis (with a view to performing PTA or placing a synthetic gra) or on conrming a high-ow s­tula with arterial steal (DASS). Once excessive stula ow has been established as the cause of ischemia, real-time measure­ment of peripheral ow velocity in response to increasing manual compression of the stula is performed to estimate the expected eects of dierent surgical revision techniques (tailoring, banding, or distal revascularization and interval ligation (DRIL)). Duplex ultrasound can also be used for intraoperative monitoring of the eects of ow reduction by
cu placement or plication (Aschwanden etal. 2003; Zanow etal. 2006). Arterial steal results if venous outow is greater than the capacity of the feeding artery (e.g., due to dilata­tion). Such a stula draws blood from areas peripheral to the anastomosis and is characterized by reversed ow in the feeding artery distal to the venous anastomosis.
Peripheral ischemia occurs in 2–8% of all patients with a
hemodialysis access.
Identifying the underlying cause can
be complex. Underlying causes include DASS due to exces­sive stula ow and a relevant proximal stenosis of the feed­ing artery presenting with poor hemodialysis ow. Proximal stenosis of the feeding artery can be identied by spectral Doppler interrogation upstream of the venous anastomosis while the stula is being compressed. During compression of the stula, the waveform should become triphasic, while a monophasic ow prole and delayed upstroke suggest steno­sis of the feeding artery (. Fig.4.12b, c (Atlas)). e stenosis is then localized by mapping the feeding artery upstream of the spectral Doppler sampling site.
e next step is spectral Doppler imaging of the feeding artery just distal to the venous anastomosis, comparing ow in this segment without and with compression of the stula (. Figs.4.17 and 4.19 (Atlas)). Comprehensive assessment of the hemodynamic situation is crucial for deciding about the best therapeutic management (DRIL, banding). If the wave­form obtained without compression shows two-and-fro ow (systolic forward ow and diastolic backward ow) or even persistent ow reversal, then this is diagnostic of arterial steal. In a patient with peripheral ischemia, this ultrasound nding is an indication for restricting ow through the vascular access (e.g., banding) or a DRIL procedure (Anaya- Ayala etal. 2012; Scali etal. 2013), and no additional diagnostic tests are necessary. Flow reversal in the distal feeding artery with­out symptoms of ischemia is observed when there is retro­grade lling with backward ow in the brachial artery via the palmar arch, and these patients do not require treatment.
4.7 · Hemodialysis Access Complications
275
4
In the absence of steal-related ow changes in the artery distal to the venous anastomosis, manual compression of the stula will nearly always elicit faster ow (PSV) in this seg­ment and can thus help in estimating a potential benecial eect of access ow restriction on peripheral perfusion and in deciding which treatment option will restore adequate perfusion of the hand (banding or gra interposition to reduce the lumen; the latter is typically only necessary when a high PSV of >2m/s is measured in the stula). e eect of ow-restricting measures can be estimated by pre- and intra­operative determination of ow in the distal feeding artery and the stula while applying graded compression. Patients in whom high stula ow has been ruled out as the cause of ischemia are candidates for a DRIL procedure. Before DRIL is performed, it is important, especially in diabetics, to evalu­ate the distal feeding artery down to the nger arteries for any additional stenotic lesions amenable to treatment (PTA). e search is best performed by levelwise spectral Doppler interrogation of the distal radial artery and the nger arteries with intermittent mapping. e sonographic search for ste­nosis in this territory is time-consuming and may be limited in diabetics with severe medial calcication. A supplemen­tary angiogram is helpful for detecting stenotic lesions in this territory.
is is the only situation that may require an angiographic examination. Otherwise, the unique hemodynamic informa­tion obtained with color duplex imaging is oen superior in elucidating underlying vascular access problems in patients with symptoms of ischemia.
When DASS due to excessive stula ow is suspected, duplex ultrasound can be used to quantify the stula ow volume (see increases the risk of peripheral ischemia and high-output cardiac failure (Bay etal. 1998). In most cases, however, ow quantication is not necessary, and a treatment decision can be made based on the spectral Doppler ndings obtained in the feeding artery distal to the venous anastomosis (includ­ing the nger arteries) with and without manual compres­sion of the stula (. Fig.4.17 (Atlas)).
Another cause of peripheral ischemia is ow diversion through competing veins arising from the access vein. erefore, the access vein should be examined once excessive stula ow and arterial inow obstruction have been ruled out as underlying causes of symptomatic ischemia. Accessory veins are marked for subsequent surgical ligation to restore adequate peripheral perfusion.
4.7.2.2 Hemodialysis Access Aneurysm
Because of the supercial location of the hemodialysis access, occlusion or aneurysm can be diagnosed clinically. Duplex ultrasonography may be performed to conrm the clinical diagnosis and to identify the origin and extent of an aneu­rysm (suture aneurysm, puncture aneurysm) for planning the therapeutic procedure.
Pseudoaneurysm (or false aneurysm) is a typical punc-
ture complication developing when blood escapes through a defect in the arterial wall. e resulting subcutaneous blood
7 Sect. 4.4). A volume ow rate>1200mL/min
collection has a persisting communication with the artery. Color duplex ultrasound identies a pseudoaneurysm as a perivascular space with pulsatile ow. A pseudoaneurysm of the arterialized access vein is typically associated with obstructed venous drainage (stenosis or partial thrombosis of the access vein or axillary vein). Sonographic demonstra­tion of to-and-fro ow identies the neck of the pseudoaneu­rysm. Occasionally, thrombin injection is a treatment option but requires even greater care than in native arteries to avoid thrombin escape into the blood bloodstream and drainage toward the heart. Precautions include complete manual com­pression of the stula during thrombin instillation and restriction of arterial inow by placement of a tourniquet. Aer these precautions, ultrasound-guided thrombin instil­lation should begin in the periphery (5000IU in 5mL 0.9% NaCl) monitoring clot formation by color duplex ultrasound
. Fig.4.11a, b (Atlas)). A suture aneurysm is a pseudoaneu-
( rysm due to suture failure and is commonly associated with infection (
pouchings that develop on the basis of degeneration of the wall of the arterialized vein. ey are dened as circum­scribed increases in diameter to over 15mm or to twice the diameter of the proximal segment. Fistula dilatation is com­mon due to turbulent ow (especially distal to a narrowed segment) and an increased wall pressure resulting from arte­rialization of the access vein. Such dilatations may extend over a considerable length of the draining vein when a hemo­dialysis access has been used for many years (. Fig.4.3).
4.7.2.3 Inadequate or Excessive Fistula Flow
A wide range of stula ow rates, from 500 to 1200mL/min, is deemed acceptable for hemodialysis. Rates exceeding 1600mL/min (Grosser etal. 1991) or 20% of the cardiac out­put can cause complications such as cardiac insuciency or ischemia distal to the vascular access. Estimation of the vol­ume ow rate through the stula may be helpful in various situations such as assessment of the outcome of stula band­ing or other ow-restricting measures. As discussed above, various methods exist to quantify stula ow volume (see
7 Sect. 4.4). eoretically, the most accurate method is to
calculate the dierence between ow volumes in the feeding artery proximal and distal to the arteriovenous anastomosis. Practically and technically, it is easier and more accurate to calculate stula ow volume from measurements in the ipsi­lateral and contralateral brachial artery or from measure­ments taken without and with compression of the stula (. Fig.4.10e–g). e latter is the most accurate method. A volume ow rate of less than 300mL/min is widely assumed to be inadequate for eective hemodialysis, and low ow or a decrease in stula ow volume over time is regarded as a pre­dictor of hemodialysis access failure.
beginning in the feeding artery (for details see 7 Sect. 4.7.1). Increased pulsatility in the brachial artery suggests obstruc­tion of the stula or venous outow, and the next step is to examine the venous anastomosis (especially in patients with
. Fig.4.11d (Atlas)).
True vascular access-related aneurysms are focal out-
Poor stula ow should prompt a search for stenosis,
276
Chapter 4 · Arteriovenous Fistulas
4
a b
. Fig.4.6 a Retrograde arterialization via backward supply to an accessory branch with reduction of stula ow: such accessory branches can
be identied sonographically and marked for ligation (According to Scholz 1998). b Brescia-Cimino stula at the wrist with inadequate ow for hemodialysis. Once stenosis has been ruled out, the examiner must search for accessory branches that divert blood away from the main vein. Such branches need to be ligated to ensure adequate blood ow through the access vein. In the case shown, ultrasound identied an accessory vein with relevant ow. The spectral display shows an increase in PSV within the access vein from 50cm/s (due to ow diversion) to 75cm/s (with manual compression of the accessory vein)
a Brescia-Cimino stula). If there is no ow obstruction at this site, the length of the access segment is scanned, with a focus on stenosis or partial thrombosis. If ow in the stula is more pulsatile than expected, the examiner should proceed to search for a ow obstruction of the draining veins, espe­cially the axillary and subclavian veins.
Central venous obstruction with impaired venous
drainage can lead to congestion and edema. Aected patients may present with arm swelling, especially when there is poor collateralization and stula ow is high. In these patients, a careful evaluation of the axillary and subclavian veins is war­ranted to search for venous narrowing. is is accomplished by spectral Doppler evaluation of the axillary vein in the infraclavicular fossa. Normal venous ow in this region should show both respiratory phasicity and atrial pulsatility (W-shaped waveform). Obstructed central venous drainage is suggested when, compared with the contralateral arm, this ow modulation is lost or markedly damped during manual compression of the stula. Compression is necessary to avoid misinterpretation because phasicity and pulsatility of venous ow may also be modulated by high stula ow. Also in the infraclavicular fossa, the cephalic vein termination is evaluated for stenosis and the axillary vein for thrombotic deposits.
Luminal narrowing of the draining vein is seen in up to 40% of hemodialysis patients but may be asymptomatic if collaterals are present (Hecking etal. 2006; Neville et al.
2004). Venous obstruction oen occurs secondary to a cen­tral venous intervention or placement of a central venous catheter. With 93% sensitivity and 94% specicity, color duplex ultrasonograpy has replaced venography in diagnos­ing obstructed venous drainage (Grogan etal. 2005). Color duplex imaging is also the method of choice for post­interventional evaluation of the access vein and central venous outow. e primary patency rate aer PTA alone is only 7–43% versus 11–70% for PTA with stenting (Mickley
2006). In patients with a synthetic dialysis access, narrowing primarily occurs at the site of the venous (distal) anastomo­sis and is due to intimal hyperplasia (Gaanterman et al. 1995; Roy-Chaudhury etal. 2001). In a study of 38 patients with clinically suspected hemodialysis access gra stenosis examined by Doppler ultrasound and angiography, Robbin etal. (1998) found ultrasound to reliably depict stenoses of access gras and draining veins using PSV criteria. A focal two- to three-fold PSV increase was associated with 75% or greater stenosis.
Vascular access thrombosis can progress to partial or even complete occlusion. It has many causes including pre­existing stenosis, puncture complications (dissection, wall hematoma), stula infection, and local compression, and the risk is higher in patients with episodes of hypovolemia or hypotension.
Another cause of
low stula ow (once stenosis has been
ruled out) is diversion of blood through collateral veins coursing parallel to the access vein. Dilated accessory veins with large ow volumes can cause arm swelling. If the branches arise close to the venous anastomosis, patients may develop symptomatic arterial steal. Inadequate dialysis ow, new-onset steal-related symptoms (especially if they develop some time aer creation of the dialysis stula) (. Fig.4.19a-d (Atlas)), and arm swelling should prompt a color duplex examination to search for branching veins along the length of the access vein (in transverse orientation). Flow velocity and diameter of the branch vein are measured to determine the amount of blood diverted from the hemodialysis access vein. In addition, a branch vein can be compressed to estimate the ow increase likely to occur in the access segment aer liga­tion. A relevant branch vein identied sonographically can then be marked for ligation (
. Fig. 4.6). e presence of
branch veins may also be the reason that an AV stula fails to mature. In this case, ligation will lead to maturation within a short time.
4.8 · Diagnostic Role ofDuplex Ultrasound Compared withOther Modalities
277
4
Flow volumes of over 1500–2000mL/min may occur in
patients with a more proximal hemodialysis access (bend of the elbow) if the cephalic vein is dilated and the anastomosis is too wide. Such high ow rates can lead to high-output car­diac insuciency, especially in patients with compensated cardiac insuciency or pre-existing cardiac damage. Quantication of the stula ow volume by duplex ultra­sound (the most reliable method for this purpose) can help avoid this complication, allowing identication of candidates for banding and assessment of the adequacy of ow reduc­tion aer treatment.
4.7.2.4 Arm Swelling
Venous outow obstruction in patients with a hemodialysis access may be due to (partial) central vein thrombosis or terminal stenosis of the cephalic vein (. Figs.4.15 and 4.18 (both Atlas)) and can present with arm swelling. Obstructed central venous drainage is suggested when there is increased pulsatility of ow in the access near the anastomosis and is conrmed by compression ultrasound or duplex ultra­sound with the transducer in the infraclavicular fossa (incomplete compressibility of the vein with marginal ow around the clot). In patients with a loop gra, venous out­ow obstruction may also be due to a stenosis upstream of the venous anastomosis. If no outow obstruction is identi­ed, the examiner proceeds to scan the length of the stula in the transverse plane beginning at the venous anasto­masosis to look for large-caliber accessory veins arising from the access vein. ( When pressure in an accessory vein is high, it not only drains blood to the heart but also diverts blood to the fore­arm and hand. Venous ow reversal is identied sono­graphically, and these veins are then marked for surgical ligation.
Other complications cause circumscribed swelling. An example is pseudoaneurysm at puncture sites, which is iden­tied on color ow images by the characteristic to-and-fro ow through a persisting communication with the parent vessel. Like a pseudoaneurysm developing as a complication of femoral artery puncture, a hemodialysis-access-related pseudoaneurysm can be treated by ultrasound-guided thrombin instillation. However, to prevent drainage of thrombin toward the center, even greater precautions should be taken including short manual compression of the access segment downstream of the aneurysm during instillation
. Fig.4.11a, b (Atlas)).
(
4.8 Diagnostic Role ofDuplex Ultrasound
. Figs.4.16 and 4.19 (both Atlas)).
Compared withOther Modalities
Gray-scale ultrasound identies both morphologic vascular changes of a hemodialysis access (dilatation, aneurysm, nar­rowing, thrombosis) and perivascular lesions (hematoma, abscess). (Color) duplex imaging provides quantitative infor­mation on stula ow and identies stenoses of the access vein and inow artery. Ultrasonography thus enables more
comprehensive evaluation of suspected hemodialysis access complications and their dierential diagnosis than the mere visualization of vascular morphology by angiography. Angiography has the advantage of providing a better over­view of the vascular anatomy around an AV stula, but evalu­ation of complex vascular patterns may be impaired by overlying vessels. Sonographically detected pathology such as stenosis, length of dilated segment, or venous short cir­cuits can be directly marked on the skin for surgical manage­ment. Ultrasound has 91–98% sensitivity and specicity in identifying arterial and venous stenosis, and provides unique information on the complex hemodynamic situation around an AV hemodialysis access and its pathology. is informa­tion is more relevant for deciding about the best treatment strategy in patients with hemodialysis access problems or complications (e.g., low ow, peripheral ischemia, arm swelling) than the morphologic information provided by angiography.

4.8.1 Therapeutic Decision-Making

Color duplex ultrasound is an excellent tool for the prether­apeutic evaluation of patients with an occluded Brescia­Cimino stula, providing valuable information for deciding between surgical and interventional management. Over time, a hemodialysis access may degenerate with alternating widening and constriction. ese changes are detectable by ultrasound, also in patients with large arms. Luminal nar­rowing due to scar formation at puncture sites is sono­graphically characterized by a thin lumen and thickened walls, which may additionally appear more echogenic. e ultrasound ndings thus guide the treatment decision, allowing identication of patients whose vascular access problems can be managed by an endovascular procedure with thrombectomy and those requiring surgical revision with placement of a synthetic gra (narrowing due to scar formation). Surgical revision is also necessary in patients with ectatic/aneurysmal dilatation and thrombotic deposits on the walls in conjunction with thromboembolic occlu­sion. Hemodynamic assessment with dierentiation of excessive versus normal stula ow is the basis for selecting the best therapeutic strategy when patients present with peripheral ischemia (
e decision as to when a stenosis should be treated may be dicult, especially in patients with a Brescia-Cimino s­tula that has been used for many years. Because of the degen­erative changes of such stulas, characterized by the alternation of narrowed and widened segments, higher cut­os (absolute PSV or PSV ratio) than in native arteries are required to identify therapeutically relevant stenosis. Blood ow velocity alone is no reliable measure in a natural stula and should always be interpreted in conjunction with stula adequacy. Conversely, in a synthetic gra with its invariable diameter, the PSV ratio allows reliable stenosis grading.
At the anastomosis of both native stulas and synthetic gras, the PSV ratio is an unreliable parameter. Here, an
7 Sect. 4.7.2.1).
278
Chapter 4 · Arteriovenous Fistulas
absolute PSV of 2.5m/s suggests stenosis with beginning hemodynamic relevance. Again, this says nothing about the therapeutic relevance of the stenosis. On the contrary, as long as there is adequate ow for hemodialysis, a relative stenosis may even be desirable to prevent dialysis access steal syndrome (DASS) with symptomatic peripheral isch­emia. In these patients, elimination of the stenosis may even be contraindicated and can inadvertently induce ischemia,
4
especially if preinterventional spectral Doppler interroga­tion already shows to-and-fro-ow in the feeding artery distal to the arteriovenous anastomosis. erefore, to make the right therapeutic decision, it is crucial to always inter­pret the hemodynamic sonographic ndings in conjunction with the patient’s clinical presentation or hemodialysis access problems.
e results of a recent study (Schäberle and Leyerer 2014) in 51 patients with common hemodialysis access problems (37% peripheral ischemia, 53% poor stula ow, 10% arm swelling) conrm that the three-point ultrasound protocol presented above (
7 Sect. 4.2.2.1) allows reliable pretherapeu-
tic identication of underlying causes and initiation of appropriate treatment. In 47 of the 51 patients (92%), this protocol resulted in adequate management of the underlying problems without a need for revision of the therapeutic approach. is study also showed the structured protocol to be time-ecient, requiring on average 8minutes for diagnos­tic workup of hemodialysis access problems.
studies but on experience and data obtained in the follow-up of synthetic bypass gras for steno-occlusive disease in peripheral arteries of the leg.
Another issue is whether the more or less aggressive rein­tervention policy is justied in all patients in whom routine surveillance reveals relevant hemodialysis-access-related ste­nosis. As discussed above, it is not always necessary or even desirable to treat a stenosis as long as there is adequate stula ow for hemodialysis. In certain scenarios, the elimination of a stenosis might even cause a steal eect with symptomic peripheral ischemia. While the controversy about routine surveillance remains to be solved, it is undisputed, though, that signs of hemodialysis access problems such as reduced blood ow should prompt timely sonographic evaluation tai­lored to the clinical situation.
Timely workup is the basis for adequate and individual­ized management. e following listing summarizes the hemodialysis access problems and underlying causes that are amenable to sonographic workup and dierentiation (with gure references in brackets):
Inadequate or low stula ow
5
5 Decreased inow due to stenosis of the feeding artery
(. Fig.4.12 (Atlas))
5 Stenosis of the anastomosis or access vein
(. Figs.4.13 and 4.15 (Atlas), . Fig.4.4)
5 Decreased drainage due to proximal venous outow
obstruction (stenosis or (partial) thrombosis) (. Figs.4.15 and 4.18 (Atlas))
5 Partial thrombosis of access vein with reduction of

4.8.2 Surveillance Programs?

patent lumen
5 Has stula maturation occurred? (. Fig.4.21 (Atlas))
ere is an ongoing controversy about the benet of routine duplex ultrasound surveillance in preventing thrombosis and prolonging vascular access survival in hemodialysis patients (Vachharajani 2012). It is undisputed, though, that duplex ultrasound is highly accurate in detecting vascular access stenosis (Finlay etal. 1993; Older etal. 1998; Doelman et al. 2005), and there is published evidence showing the benet of early revision for imminent access failure diag­nosed on the basis of sonographic ow measurement (Bay etal. 1998) or stenosis detection and grading (Older etal.
1998). is position is conrmed by a recent study showing that, while surveillance programs result in a 2.6% higher rate of stula interventions, they also reduce the stula thrombo­sis rate by 8.4% (Jiang etal. 2013). Despite the high diagnos­tic accuracy of ultrasound in identifying the etiologies of vascular access problems (aneurysm, stenosis, partial throm­bosis) (Pietura etal. 2005; Doelman etal. 2005), the authors
5 Inadequate stula ow due to diversion of blood ow
into (parallel) accessory veins (. Figs.4.6 and4.16 (Atlas))
5 Peripheral ischemia
5 Hyperfunctioning stula (DASS) (. Fig.4.5;
. Figs.4.10, 4.14, 4.17, and 4.20 (Atlas))
5 Arterial stenosis (. Fig.4.12 (Atlas)) 5 (Prominent accessory vein (. Figs.4.6,4.16
4.20 (Atlas)))
and
5 Arm swelling
5 Stenosis/rombus of draining vein (. Figs.4.15,
4.18, 4.19, and 4.20 (Atlas))
5 Prominent accessory vein with blood ow (retro-
grade) parallel to stula ow (. Figs.4.16, 4.19, and
4.20 (Atlas))
5 Degenerative dilatation (. Fig.4.11 (Atlas)), pseudo-
aneurysm
(. Fig.4.11 (Atlas)), infection of a large meta- analysis (Tonelli et al. 2008) and a recent review (Paulson etal. 2013) conclude that surveillance pro­grams are not justied because they do not lower the risk of access loss.
Nevertheless, there are proponents of surveillance pro­grams for native stulas, while it is undisputed that regular monitoring of synthetic access gras does not signicantly improve outcome. is conclusion is not based on scientic
Hemodialysis patients may present with complex clinical problems as a result of the intricate hemodynamic patterns that may develop in and around their vascular access over time. Such cases require an individual sonographic approach to obtain a comprehensive overview of the vascular situation including possible dierential diagnoses, which is essential for identifying the best therapeutic strategy.
4.9 · Atlas: Arteriovenous Fistulas
279

4.9 Atlas: Arteriovenous Fistulas

. Table4.5 lists the gures presented in the Atlas. e gures illustrate normal ndings, methodology, and vascular abnor-
malities in patients with an arteriovenous stula.
. Table4.5 Arteriovenous stulas– gures
Entity/Pathology Figure
4
Spontaneous AV stula
Iatrogenic AV stula
Hemodialysis access– normal ndings and volume ow measurement
Hemodyalisis access complications– high-ow stula, peripheral ischemia; volume ow measurement
Fistula ow volume calculation from measurement in the feeding artery (brachial artery) without and with stula compression
Aneurysm of hemodialysis access– puncture aneurysm, suture aneurysm, degenerative dilatation
Stenosis of proximal feeding artery
Anastomotic stenosis
Hemodialysis access complication– peripheral ischemia, arterial steal
Hemodialysis access complication– reduced stula ow, terminal cephalic vein stenosis
Hemodialysis access complication– peripheral ischemia
Peripheral ischemia after creation of hemodialysis access– accessory vein ligation
Peripheral ischemia– arterial steal with retrograde ow in palmar arch
Outow obstruction– central vein thrombosis downstream of hemodialysis access
Peripheral ischemia– to-and-fro ow, anastomotic stenosis, accessory vein
Hemodialysis access complication– progressive swelling of forearm and hand
Failure of stula maturation due to stenosis close to anastomosis
. Fig.4.7 (Atlas), page 280
. Fig.4.8 (Atlas), page 280
. Fig.4.9 (Atlas), page 281
. Fig.4.10 (Atlas), page 282
. Fig.4.10 (Atlas), page 283
. Fig.4.11 (Atlas), page 284
. Fig.4.12 (Atlas), page 285
. Fig.4.13 (Atlas), page 285
. Fig.4.14 (Atlas), page 286
. Fig.4.15 (Atlas), page 286
. Fig.4.16 (Atlas), page 287
. Fig.4.16 (Atlas), page 287
. Fig.4.17 (Atlas), page 288
. Fig.4.18 (Atlas), page 288
. Fig.4.19 (Atlas), page 289
. Fig.4.20 (Atlas), page 290
. Fig.4.21 (Atlas), page 290
280
bc
Chapter 4 · Arteriovenous Fistulas
4
a
. Fig.4.7a–c (Atlas) Spontaneous AV stula.
a Ultrasound examination to rule out thrombosis in a patient with leg swelling. The color ow image obtained while scanning the veins at the pelvic level shows a color bruit in the surrounding tissue, consistent with perivascular tissue vibration caused by an AV stula. There is highly turbulent ow in the feeding common iliac artery (CIA) and in the internal iliac artery. The Doppler waveform from the internal iliac artery near the stula shows the high diastolic ow typical of a short circuit between the arterial and venous system. The arched internal iliac artery is depicted with turbulent ow to the level of the stula (mosaic of colors). Turbulent ow is also depicted in the common iliac vein (CIV) posterior to it. The elongated external iliac artery (EIA) is seen anteriorly. b Unlike the internal iliac artery supplying the stula, the external iliac artery (EIA) shows pulsatile, triphasic ow on color duplex and in the Doppler waveform. Using intermittent spectral Doppler interrogation along the internal iliac artery and vein, the examiner can gradually approach the site of the stula, which is identied by an abrupt increase in peak systolic and especially diastolic velocities. c Contrast medium ow in angiography reveals the AV short circuit in the pelvis. Ultrasonography is superior to angiography in precisely localizing the stula. The arrows indicate the iliac artery and vein
abc
de f
. Fig.4.8a–f (Atlas) Iatrogenic AV stula.
a There is continuous diastolic ow in the common femoral artery on the right compared to the contralateral side. The time-averaged velocity (TAV) is 47.6cm/s with a peak systolic velocity (PSV) of 117cm/s and an end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of 10cm/s. b Comparison with the unaected side shows ow in the left common femoral artery to be triphasic with a PSV of 99.8cm/s and a TAV of
22.9cm/s. The common femoral artery diameter is the same on both sides. c The common femoral vein on the right has a pulsatile ow prole (with ow toward the center displayed in blue) characteristic of an arterialized vein draining an AV stula (. Fig.4.2d). d The case presented is a typical example of a iatrogenic AV stula as a complication of cardiac catheterization. This type of iatrogenic stula nearly always develops between the supercial femoral vein and the profunda femoris artery and typically occurs when the access site in the groin is chosen too low. The search for the stula reveals the connection between the profunda femoris artery (A.P.F; blue ow away from transducer) to the supercial femoral vein (V.F.S) with a high-frequency ow signal (aliasing, red) and a ow velocity of over 3.5m/s. Anteriorly, the supercial femoral artery is depicted (A.F.S; red, toward transducer). e The Doppler waveform from the profunda femoris artery (A.P.F) proximal to the AV stula shows a large diastolic ow component and the same ow prole as the common femoral artery. f Distal to the AV stula (see d), the profunda femoris artery (A.P.F; coded in blue) shows a triphasic prole without end-diastolic ow. This change in ow pattern proves that the AV stula is located between the two sampling sites (in e and f)
4.9 · Atlas: Arteriovenous Fistulas
. Fig.4.9a–c (Atlas) Hemodialysis access– normal ndings and
volume ow measurement. a Oblique image of the anastomosis of a Brescia-Cimino stula
(end-of-vein-to-side-of-artery anastomosis) in the bend of the elbow with marked turbulence at the anastomosis. Stretched brachial artery coursing posterior to the anastomosis. b The color ow image (left) shows the proximal brachial artery with ow coded in red and mild aliasing on the left and the distal brachial artery on the right (coded blue). The sharp transition from red to blue appears to indicate ow reversal but is due to a change in ow direction relative to the transducer. In the color ow image, faster blood ow in the feeding artery is indicated by brighter colors. The Doppler waveform from the feeding artery (right) shows a large diastolic ow component (end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of 95cm/s). With a calculated average ow velocity of 108cm/s and a brachial artery diameter of 4.8mm, the ow volume in the feeding artery is 1170mL/min. c The brachial artery segment distal to the AV stula has the typical ow prole of arm arteries: triphasic waveform without an end­diastolic component. The ow volume calculated for the brachial artery segment just distal to the venous anastomosis is 129mL/min (0.16cm2×60×13cm/s). The stula ow volume, calculated as the dierence in ow volumes between the brachial artery upstream and downstream of the venous anastomosis, is 1040mL/min
281
a
4
b
c
282
cd
Chapter 4 · Arteriovenous Fistulas
4
a
. Fig.4.10a–j (Atlas) Hemodyalisis access complications– high- ow stula, peripheral ischemia; volume ow measurement.
Excessive stula ow can lead to dialysis access steal syndrome (DASS) with ischemia of the hand or cardiac insuciency. Since hemodialysis patients often have considerable comorbidity, the stula must be examined as a possible cause of newly occurring signs of cardiac insuciency. Duplex ultrasound is the simplest and most reliable method for estimating the ow volume in the AV stula. A more reliable method for determin­ing stula ow volume (compared with the method illustrated in . Fig.4.9b, c) is measurement of the ow volume in the brachial artery in both arms with calculation of the stula ow volume as the dierence between the stula-bearing arm and the non-stula-bearing arm. a When this feature is available, the system’s software calculates the mean time-averaged velocity (TAV) from the Doppler waveform recorded with an angle of less than 60° (144cm/s in this case). b At the same site, the vessel diameter is measured in the B-mode scan (6.5mm). For accurate calculation of the vascular cross-sectional area, the systolic and diastolic diameters have to be measured (using the leading-edge method, . Fig. 1.28) and weighted at a ratio of 1:2. This is done in the time-motion mode with an angle of insonation perpendicular to the vessel (i.e., as close to 90° as possible). In the example, a ow volume of 2778mL/min is calculated from the mean TAV and cross-sectional area. c The same measurements are performed in the brachial artery of the non-stula-bearing arm, where the ow prole is triphasic with a mean TAV of 21.9cm/s. d After calculation of the mean cross-sectional area from the systolic and diastolic diameters, a mean ow volume of 108mL/min is calculated. The example also illustrates the ow-induced dilatation of the arterial vessels as a cause of increased ow in long-standing AV stulas (the diameter dierences between the views with spectral Doppler displays (a, c) and those with time-motion displays (b, d) are due to the use of dierent scales).
e–j Fistula ow volume calculation from measurement in the feeding artery (brachial artery) without and with stula compression. e Patient presenting with peripheral ischemia and clinical dilation of the access vein 11years after establishment of an AV stula in the bend of
the elbow. Sonographic measurement reveals dilatation of the feeding brachial artery with a systolic diameter of 6.8mm and diastolic diameter of
6.4mm, from which a vascular cross-sectional area of 0.34cm2 is calculated (with 1:2 weighting of systolic and diastolic diameters). f Without compression of the stula, the brachial artery upstream of the AV anastomosis has a time-averaged velocity (TAV) of 120cm/s with a ow prole characteristic of an artery feeding an AV stula. g With manual compression of the stula, TAV determined at the same site in the brachial artery is 10cm/s, and the waveform is triphasic (which is the pattern characteristic of high-resistance ow in peripheral arteries). The stula ow volume calculated from these measurements is high and is diagnostic of a hyperfunctioning AV stula: 0.34 × (120–10)=37.4cm3/s or 2.24l/min (cross-sectional area multiplied by (TAV without stula compression minus TAV with stula compression)).
h Distal to the AV anastomosis, the brachial artery shows retrograde ow with a monophasic waveform, consistent with arterial steal. i With manual compression of the AV stula, there is normal ow to the periphery with a triphasic waveform in the distal brachial artery. j Dilated access vein with large caliber variation (in part with oval vessel cross-section) and turbulent ow, which precludes reliable direct ow
volume determination in the access vein
b
4.9 · Atlas: Arteriovenous Fistulas
283
4
diameter B-mode
e
distal to AV anastomosis
time-motion display
without fistula
compression
brachial arterybrbbr
f
distal to AV anastomosis
without fistula compression
with
fistula compression
hi
. Fig.4.10 (continued)
brachial artery
with fistula compression
g
access vein
j