Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5760_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
12
Chapter 1 · Fundamental Principles
unchanged because uid reects and attenuates only little of
1
the ultrasound energy. Time gain compensation therefore amplies echoes returning from behind a low-attenuation region more than necessary. Acoustic enhancement can be exploited diagnostically in distinguishing a uid-lled lesion such as a cyst from a solid mass (. Fig.1.14).
1.1.1.9.4 Side Lobes
A transducer transmits not only the main beam (also called the main lobe) but also some weaker beams, or side lobes, on either side of the primary beam in the near eld. When a side lobe strikes a strong reector, the obliquely deected echoes are misrepresented in the resulting image because they are processed as if they had originated from the main
1.1.1.9.3 Edge Eect
e edge eect is a form of acoustic shadowing that is observed at the margins of curved, uid-lled spaces such as cysts and is assumed to be caused by a combination
beam (. Fig.1.16). Modern ultrasound systems use various techniques, such as delay time calculation or suppression of echoes not returning along a path perpendicular to the trans-
ducer face, to minimize side lobe eects. of refraction and reection. When a parallel ultrasound beam passes through the lateral border of such a space, sound is diverted into the surrounding tissue. As a result, no ultrasound signal penetrates beyond the diverting structure, and hence no diagnostic information is obtained from that area. is phenomenon also explains the incom­plete display of the margins of certain structures such as the fetal head or a blood vessel depicted in cross-section (. Fig.1.15).
1.1.1.9.5 Reverberation Artifact
is type of artifact is also known as multiple reection
artifact and occurs when ultrasound is reected back to
the transducer from a strongly reective surface in the near
eld. Part of the returning echo is properly processed by the
transducer, while another part is reected back into the body.
Sound can thus bounce back and forth between the reec-
tor and the transducer face (ping-pong eect). e resulting
. Fig. 1.13 Posterior shadowing occurs when a large impedance
mismatch or object with high sound absorption is encountered ( Courtesy of Hitachi Ltd.)
. Fig. 1.15 Edge eects are
caused by a combination of refraction and reection when a parallel ultrasound beam passes through the lateral border of a curved, uid-lled space. Right section: Transverse image of an artery showing the eect of an ultrasound beam tangentially hit­ting the arterial wall. The beam is refracted, giving rise to an acous­tic shadow posteriorly, where no ultrasound energy is present that can be reected (Courtesy of Hitachi Ltd.)
. Fig. 1.14 Acoustic enhancement occurs behind low-attenuating
areas (Courtesy of Hitachi Ltd.)
A
X
X
c
2c
1.1 · Technical Principles ofDiagnostic Ultrasound
. Fig. 1.16 Diagram of side lobe artifact (Courtesy of Hitachi Ltd.)
. Fig. 1.17 Diagram of reverberation artifact. This is the repeat
reection of an ultrasound beam hitting a strong reector near the transducer. In this situation, sound will bounce back and forth between the reector and the transducer. Echoes from multiple reections return to the transducer later than the direct echoes and are misrepre­sented in the image as a copy of the original object at a greater depth (Courtesy of Hitachi Ltd.)
reverberation artifact is seen in the display as several equi­distant echoes decreasing in brightness with depth. is artifact typically arises when there is a large acoustic imped­ance mismatch near the transducer (so tissue/air interface) (. Fig.1.17).
1.1.1.9.6 Geometric Distortion
In processing returning echoes and creating an image, the ultrasound system relies on certain assumptions, for example, that ultrasound travels in a straight line or at a constant speed in the body. In fact, however, an ultrasound beam can be deected from its straight path, and the speed of sound varies slightly with the tissue. As a result, the ultrasound image may not reect the exact anatomic location of a feature.
13
1.1.2 Basic Physics ofDoppler Ultrasound
In 1842, the Austrian physicist and mathematician Christian Johann Doppler described what is now called the Doppler eect or Doppler shi. is phenomenon refers to the change in frequency of a wave resulting from relative movement between the source of the wave and an observer. A familiar example is an ambulance siren: although the emitted fre­quency remains the same, the siren has a higher pitch when the ambulance is approaching and a lower pitch when the vehicle is receding. e pitch changes abruptly at the moment the ambulance passes the observer. us, the pitch of the siren perceived by the human ear depends on the direction of motion relative to the observer and remains consistently high while the vehicle is approaching and consistently low while it is receding. is is dierent from the intensity of the sound, or the loudness of the siren, which increases gradually as the vehicle approaches and then decreases gradually aer the vehicle has passed the observer. e Doppler eect occurs when the source or the observer is moving toward or away from the other or when both are moving relative to each other. For a vehicle traveling at a speed of 100km/h, the dierence in pitch due to the Doppler eect is almost two whole tones.
Compared to the emitted frequency, the received fre­quency is higher when the source and receiver approach each other and lower during the recession (. Fig.1.18a).
is dierence in frequency, occurring when the source and/or receiver of a sound wave move relative to each other, is known as the Doppler eect or Doppler shi.
In diagnostic ultrasound, the Doppler eect is used to calculate blood ow velocity from the dierence in frequency between the emitted and reected waves; this was rst reported by Satomura in 1959. e signals reected by moving red blood cells have a dierent frequency than the emitted beam. In this case, the transducer transmitting and receiving the signals is stationary and the frequency shi is caused by the motion of the reector (red blood cells). In this situation, the Doppler shi occurs twice– when the ultrasound beam emitting from the stationary transducer strikes the red blood cells and when the blood cells backscatter the signal, now acting as a mov­ing source with the transducer becoming a stationary receiver. e Doppler shi frequency depends on the frequency of the transmitted ultrasound waves, the velocity of the moving red blood cells, and the angle at which the Doppler beam inter­sects the vessel. is angle is known as the Doppler angle.
e Doppler eect can be used to calculate blood ow velocity because the Doppler shi frequency depends on the direction of blood ow and is proportional to the speed of the moving red blood cells. e shi is detected by the Doppler probe. e direction of blood ow relative to the transducer determines whether the returning echoes have a higher or lower frequency, and the ow velocity determines the mag­nitude of the frequency shi (. Fig.1.18b). is relationship is expressed in the Doppler equation:
Fv
××
os
FFF
=-=
dr
0
0
a
1
14
Chapter 1 · Fundamental Principles
1
Doppler Effect
Stationary source Moving source
∆F = Fr – F0 = 2 · F0 · v
+ Df
f
f
0
. Fig. 1.18a, b Doppler eect. a Dependence of the Doppler shift (change in frequency between source and receiver) on the velocity of the
moving source and its direction of motion relative to the reector. b Diagram of Doppler interrogation of a vessel with laminar blood ow. The arrows in the vessel are vectors representing dierent ow velocities. Blood ow is fastest in the center and decreases toward the wall. The draw­ing illustrates the eect of the angle of incidence on the Doppler measurement. In the equation for calculating the Doppler shift, this angle is rep­resented by the cosine function. The Doppler shift increases with the acuity of the angle (cosine of 90°=0) (T, transmitter; R, receiver; F0, emitted frequency; Fr, reected frequency)
f
0
Df »
f
0
Df
0
v
c
Fd Doppler frequency shi F0 emitted frequency Fr reected frequency
ν mean ow velocity of the reecting red blood cells
f
0
ba
. Table 1.5 Dependence of the Doppler shift frequency (Df)
on the angle of insonation
Parameter Values
Vessel
cos α
c
T
R
0
F
r
F
α
c speed of sound in so tissue (about 1540m/s)
α angle between ultrasound beam and direction of blood
ow In the transcutaneous measurement of blood ow by Dop­pler ultrasound, angle correction is necessary to calculate the ow velocity because the Doppler beam cannot be aligned
Angle α 30° 45° 60° 90°
Cos α 1 0.866 0.707 0.5 0
Df (MHz) 7.79 6.75 5.51 3.90 0
Percentage error 0 13 29 50 100
parallel to the direction of ow. e transformation with representation of the dierent velocity vectors is expressed mathematically as a cosine function of the angle between the sound beam and the blood vessel (cos α).
(or Δf) is proportional to the velocity of blood ow,
F
d
cos α, and the carrier frequency of the ultrasound beam.
For angles of about 90°, the cosine function yields val­ues around 0, at which there is no Doppler frequency shi, and the Doppler shi increases as the angle decreases (with a maximum cosα of 1 at α=0°).
e blood ow velocity is calculated by solving the Doppler shi equation for V:
calculation. At angles around 90°, a Doppler shi is no longer detectable and the ow direction cannot be determined. is is reected in the color duplex scan by the absence of color­coded ow signals although ow is present.
. Table1.5 lists the Doppler shi frequencies for dier-
ent angles of incidence, illustrating how the percentage error in calculating blood ow velocity increases with the Doppler angle. e values were calculated for a transmitted frequency of 6MHz and a blood ow velocity of 1ms/1.
It is apparent from the examples listed in . Table1.5 that
no Doppler shi is detectable at a 90° angle of incidence. e
VFF
=-
()
×
r
0
c
×
2cos
a
F
0
reason is that when the ultrasound beam is perpendicular to the direction of blood ow, there is no relative movement
between the Doppler probe and red blood cells. Velocity is formula allows calculation of the blood ow velocity from the measured Doppler frequency shi at a given trans­mit frequency and angle of incidence. e accuracy of the calculation increases with the acuity of the angle. Ideally, the Doppler angle should be kept at or below 60° to minimize errors in the calculation of ow velocity. At angles above 60°, even minor errors in determining the Doppler angle (which are unavoidable in the clinical setting, especially when curved vessels are interrogated) unduly distort the velocity
measurement is most accurate when the Doppler beam
is aligned parallel to the blood ow. If this is not possible,
accurate velocity estimates can only be made if the Doppler
angle is measured using angle correction. e Doppler angle
is measured by placing the angle correction cursor parallel to
the direction of ow in the B-mode image. For precise calcu-
lation, a correction factor of 1/cosα is used.
. Table1.6 lists
the correction factors for dierent Doppler angles and the
overestimation or underestimation of blood ow velocities
1.1 · Technical Principles ofDiagnostic Ultrasound
. Table 1.6 Relationship between Doppler angle and error in
blood ow velocity calculation
15
1
Angle α Correction factor
1/cos α
30° 1.15 ±3%
45° 1.41 ±6%
60° 2.00 ±9%
70° 2.92 ±14%
75° 3.86 ±21%
80° 5.76 ±30%
Error in calculated blood ow velocity
resulting from cursor misplacement. e data in . Table1.6 illustrate how the error in calculating blood ow velocities increases with the Doppler angle. e examiner must there­fore try to minimize the insonation angle for Doppler inter­rogation.
Doppler shi frequencies are extracted by the demodu­lator of the ultrasound system based on a comparison of the returning Doppler-shied signal and the transmitted frequency. e Doppler shi frequencies occurring in medi­cal imaging are in the audible range and can be output to a loudspeaker. Information about the direction of ow relative to the transducer can also be extracted from the Doppler sig­nal; this, however, requires more sophisticated demodulation techniques. Blood ow toward the transducer produces a positive frequency shi, and blood ow away from the trans­ducer a negative shi.
Blood ow velocity varies across the vessel lumen. Blood cells move faster in the center and slower near the wall due to friction, giving rise to a laminar ow prole. Other fac­tors aecting the ow prole include the pulsatility of blood ow and the elasticity of the vessel wall or changes in ow resulting from bends in the vessel, branching, and narrow­ing. e Doppler signal derived from owing blood thus contains a range of frequencies, which can be extracted using a mathematical algorithm called fast Fourier trans­form (FFT). is spectral analysis enables changes in blood ow velocity to be displayed over time. In the resulting Doppler spectrum or waveform, the magnitudes of posi­tive and negative shis are displayed above and below the baseline, respectively. e distribution of frequency shis or velocities at any given point in time is encoded in the brightness of the pixels.
1.1.2.1 Continuous Wave Doppler Ultrasound
Continuous wave (CW) Doppler (. Fig. 1.19) uses two transducer elements– one continuously transmitting and the other continuously receiving ultrasound. Blood ow velocity is calculated from the frequency shi of the signal reected by the moving red blood cells.
CW Doppler systems may be directional or nondirec­tional. Nondirectional systems cannot discriminate between
CW Doppler
R
T
f
. Fig. 1.19 Diagram of continuous wave (CW) Doppler ultrasound.
Ultrasound pulses are continuously emitted by the transmitter (T), and frequency-shifted signals reected by red blood cells moving at dier­ent velocities (V) are picked up by the receiver (R)
f’
V
positive and negative ow directions. In a directional sys­tem, information on the ow direction is extracted from the phase shi. As ultrasound is continuously transmitted and received, CW Doppler cannot assign the returning Doppler signal to a specic depth. Hence, the returning signal con­tains ow information from all vessels along the beam path. With arteries and veins oen lying close together, the CW Doppler signal simultaneously represents arterial and venous ow. When performed with a high transmit frequency, CW Doppler allows sensitive examination of supercial vessels.
e advantage of CW Doppler lies in the detection of high ow velocities without aliasing, which is accomplished by the use of separate transmit and receive crystals for the simultaneous emission and reception of ultrasound signals.
1.1.2.2 Pulsed Wave Doppler Ultrasound/
Duplex Ultrasound
Pulsed wave (PW) Doppler (. Fig.1.20) is similar to con­ventional B-mode scanning in that the same piezoelectric elements alternately emit ultrasound pulses and receive the incoming echoes.
e depth from which a returning signal originates can be determined by calculating the round trip time (based on knowledge of the speed of sound in tissue) as follows: a short pulse is emitted, and the system is switched o for some time before the receive mode is switched on. In this way, only echoes arriving at the transducer face with the system in the receive mode are processed, ignoring echoes arriving dur­ing the o-mode. e time during which the transducer is in the receive mode is the range gate. By changing the range gate, the operator can dene the sample volume or Doppler window. A typical sample volume encompasses the entire
16
Chapter 1 · Fundamental Principles
diameter of the target vessel. e number of pulses emit-
1
ted per second is the pulse repetition frequency (PRF). e maximum PRF that can be used decreases with the depth of the vessel interrogated, as it then takes longer for the echoes to return to the transducer.
Sound waves travel through the human body at a fairly constant speed of approx. 1540m/s. Hence, the round trip time varies with the distance between the reector and the
transmitter, and the operator can dene a scan depth using a time lter. An electronic gate then opens briey, allowing only signals from this site to pass, while discarding all echoes coming in earlier or later. It is thus possible to selectively record Doppler signals from the specied depth. e com­bination of PW Doppler with real-time gray-scale imaging is the basis for duplex ultrasonography. PW Doppler has the advantage of providing axial resolution (discrimina­tion of vessels along the ultrasound beam), but is limited by the fact that it fails to adequately record high-velocity sig­nals (depending on the transmit frequency and penetration depth). Using a single crystal for transmitting and receiving signals requires a delay between pulses for the processing of
PW Doppler
returning echoes. e longer the pulse delay, the lower the peak ow velocity that can be detected.
Duplex ultrasound combines 2D real-time imaging with
pulsed Doppler and thus provides ow information from a sample volume at a dened depth. Duplex scanning enables calculation of blood ow velocity from the Doppler frequency
R
+
T
shi as the angle of incidence between the ultrasound beam and the vessel axis can be measured in the B-mode image.
1.1.2.3 Frequency Processing
f
f’
In a blood vessel, blood components move with dierent velocities, which are represented in the Doppler spectrum by a range of frequencies with dierent amplitudes reecting the distribution of ow velocities in the vessel. e spectrum is analyzed using fast Fourier transform (FFT), which breaks down the waveform into a series of sinusoidal waveforms.
. Fig. 1.20 Diagram of pulsed wave (PW) Doppler ultrasound. The
transducer alternately emits short ultrasound pulses (T, transmitter) and records the reected echoes at dened intervals (R, receiver)
For the individual frequency values, the corresponding amplitudes are calculated and displayed in dierent shades of gray (. Fig.1.21).
Oscillator
5 MHz
2640 Hz
5 MHz
10 cm/s
30 cm/s
50 cm/s
60 cm/s
. Fig. 1.21 Function of a Doppler transducer. Ultrasound waves are emitted by an oscillator and reected by red blood cells moving through
the vessel at dierent velocities. The signal is reected with a shifted frequency, or Doppler shift, which depends on the speed and relative direc­tion of the moving reectors. The received Doppler signal is composed of a range of frequencies, which have to be sorted by fast Fourier trans­form (FFT) before they can be displayed over time in the form of a Doppler frequency spectrum or waveform (Diagram courtesy of GE Healthcare)
Analyzer
5.00044 MHz
5.00132 MHz
5.0022 MHz
5.00264 MHz
2200 Hz 1320 Hz
440 Hz
Frequency
3
2
1
0
s
Doppler frequency
1.1 · Technical Principles ofDiagnostic Ultrasound
Amplitude
17
1
Wall filter
a
b
. Fig. 1.22 a Three-dimensional Doppler frequency spectrum showing the distribution of individual Doppler shifts (amplitudes), ow direc-
tions (above and below the time axis), and ow velocities (computed from Doppler frequency shifts). The heights of the boxes correspond to the amplitudes of the respective Doppler frequencies. A Doppler frequency spectrum represents amplitudes by dierent levels of brightness. In color­coded duplex ultrasound, the averaged ow velocity at a given point in time (black boxes) is displayed in color according to the ow direction and superimposed on the two-dimensional gray-scale image in real time (According to P.M.Klews, in Wolf and Fobbe 1993). b Doppler frequency spectrum of the supercial femoral artery (left section). The histogram plotted on the vertical axis on the left represents the distribution of the dif­ferent Doppler frequency shifts during systole. In the Doppler waveform, this distribution is represented by dierent levels of brightness (laminar ow). The right section shows the corresponding distribution during systole in the common carotid artery, which has less pulsatile ow
Time
According to Fourier’s theorem, any periodic wave­form can be reconstructed from its component waveforms. Conversely, in spectral analysis, a complex waveform of a given frequency (Doppler shi frequency) is decomposed into its frequency components. In this case, the FFT yields the amplitudes of the individual frequencies of the respective sine and cosine functions, which together make up the wave­form. e individual frequencies thus separated are continu­ously displayed over time in the Doppler frequency spectrum (spectral waveform). e Doppler spectrum contains the fol­lowing information on blood ow (. Fig.1.22a):
5 e vertical axis representing dierent ow velocities as
Doppler frequency shis
5 e horizontal axis representing the time course of the
frequency shis
5 Density of points, or color intensity, on the vertical axis rep-
resenting the number of red blood cells moving at a certain
velocity (may also be plotted in the form of a histogram)
Flow toward and away from the transducer is processed simultaneously and respectively represented above and below the baseline (zero ow velocity line).
Alternatively, some ultrasound devices display the mag­nitudes of the dierent velocity components in a separate power spectrum. is is done by measuring the signal inten­sities of the individual Doppler frequencies at a specic time in the cardiac cycle and displaying the spectral distribution in a histogram (. Fig.1.22b; . Table1.7).
1.1.2.4 Blood Flow Measurement
e most important parameters for evaluating and quanti­fying blood ow that can be derived from the Doppler fre­quency spectrum are:
5 Peak systolic frequency (mainly relevant for quantifying
stenosis)
5 Peak end-diastolic frequency (stenosis, ow character) 5 Averaged blood ow velocity
18
QmLmean flow velocity cm s
(/ )/
()
min 60
Chapter 1 · Fundamental Principles
1
. Table 1.7 Spectral displays
Type of spectrum Information displayed
color coding may change as a result of a change in the ow direction relative to the sector-shaped ultrasound beam. In this case, the area of transition between red and blue is black (while it is yellow in aliasing). Black
Power spectrum Display of the power, or strength, of
individual frequencies
Frequency spectrum Display of shifted frequencies or
blood ow velocities over time
Usual mode of display Frequency spectrum
indicates that no Doppler frequency shi information is obtained because the ultrasound beam is at a 90° angle to the vessel axis.
In vitro waterbath experiments in which two precision pumps generated dierent ow proles demonstrated good
Levels of brightness or color represent the density of a given frequency in the frequency band
correlation (r= 0.98) between the volume ow rates mea­sured by duplex ultrasound and volumetry (Schäberle and Seitz 1991;
. Fig.1.24).
Even in deeper vessels, highly reproducible measure-
ments can be obtained by performing Doppler inter-
5 Intensity-weighted mean blood ow velocity (which is
the basis for calculation of the volume ow rate)
5 Variance (spectral broadening due to ow disturbances)
rogations at angles as close to 0° as possible to minimize the eects of errors in angle setting. Repeated ultrasound measurement of ow in the superior mesenteric artery
performed in 28 fasting subjects in the morning revealed a Based on these parameters, the following quantities can be calculated:
5 Angle-corrected peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-
diastolic velocity (EDV) can be calculated from the Doppler waveform. Mean ow velocity is calculated on the basis of the signal intensities.
5 e volume ow rate is calculated from the intensity-
weighted mean blood ow velocity and the vascular cross-sectional area using the following equation:
day-to-day variation of 11% in peak systolic velocity (PSV)
and of 9.7% in end- diastolic velocity (EDV) (
. Fig. 1.25).
Repeated diameter measurement using the leading-edge
method showed a day- to- day variation of 2.2% (Schäberle
and Seitz 1991).
Another source of error that can lead to over- or under­estimation of average ow velocity is to use inadequate trans­mit or receive gain settings (. Fig.1.26).
e main uncertainty in determining the volume ow rate, however, arises from the measurement of the vessel diameter and the resulting inaccuracy in calculating the
.
crosssectional area
- ccm2)
(
cross-sectional area (. Fig.1.27). In B-mode images, vessel walls appear thicker than their true anatomic size. is is due
Quantitative evaluation of blood ow requires estimation of the Doppler angle to calculate angle-corrected blood ow velocity. e Doppler shi alone does not provide this infor­mation. To minimize errors in the calculation of blood ow velocity and other parameters, the angle should be as small as possible and not exceed 60°.
At a Doppler angle of 60°, an error of ±5° in the estimated angle of insonation will lead to a 20% error in the calculated velocity. e magnitude of the error increases disproportion­ately with the angle of insonation (
. Fig.1.23).
Various measures are available to optimize the angle of insonation for spectral Doppler interrogation and measure­ment of blood ow velocity:
5 Use of a unilateral waterpath (linear-array transducer). 5 Electronic beam steering: Successive ring of the
elements in a linear-array transducer produces an
to the so-called blooming eect resulting from the strong reection of the ultrasound beam at the interface between blood and the vessel wall (. Fig.1.28b).
In summary, sonographic determination of volume ow
rates is prone to the following pitfalls:
5 Determination of average ow velocity 5 Doppler angle error 5 Uncertainty in the calculation of the vessel cross-
sectional area
5 Inaccuracy in vessel diameter measurement (bloom-
ing eect)
5 Assumption of a circular vessel cross-section. 5 Variation in the cross-sectional area during the
cardiac cycle
5 Respiratory variation in vascular cross-sectional area
(veins)
ultrasound wave that is emitted from the transducer
at a specic angle (to steer the color box and make the
insonation angle as small as possible).
5 Manual manipulation of the transducer (sector and
curved-array transducers): A curved-array transducer
with a small footprint enables a wide range of motion
including angulation for optimization of the Doppler
angle. However, the examiner must be aware that the
e uncertainty in sonographic vessel diameter measurement can be minimized and systematized by using the leading-to­leading-edge (LTL) method and low gain settings. With the LTL method, the diameter is measured from the reection of the nearest outer wall to that of the opposite inner wall
. Fig.1.28a). In vitro experiments found a greater accuracy
( for diameters below 13mm and showed the overestimation
1
Error in calculating flow
1.1 · Technical Principles ofDiagnostic Ultrasound
Cosine function
0
-1 0° 90°
100
80
60
velocity
40
20
0
01020304050607080
a
Angle between Doppler beam and vessel
180° 270° 360°
10°
90°
%
100
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
Error in calculating volume flow rate
bc
Error > 5°
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Doppler angle of incidence
< 5°
90°
19
1
d
. Fig. 1.23 a The Doppler equation incorporates the angle between the ultrasound beam and the owing blood in the form of the cosine func-
tion (cosα), with the shift being highest when the beam strikes the vessel tangentially (cosine of 0°=1) and lowest when the beam is perpendicu­lar to the direction of blood ow (cosine of 90°=0). The larger the Doppler angle, the greater the resulting error in the velocity calculation in case of inaccurate placement of the angle correction cursor (graphically shown for errors of 5° and 10°). Such errors are unavoidable, particularly when aligning the cursor with the vessel wall in curved vessel segments. b The graph illustrates the angle-dependent error in ow measurement for a misalignment of ±5°. Overestimation of the Doppler angle results in greater error in the velocity calculation than underestimation. c Error in blood ow velocity calculation resulting from misalignment of the angle correction cursor in vessels running obliquely through the scan plane. Align­ment of the angle correction cursor is more dicult if a blood vessel passes obliquely through the scan plane in the B-mode image (left drawing). An oblique course is suggested if only a short segment of a long straight vessel is depicted. In such a case, the transducer should be turned to obtain a B-mode scan visualizing a long straight vessel segment (right drawing) for optimal positioning of the angle correction cursor. d Uncer­tainty concerning the Doppler angle of insonation in a tortuous vessel. In a curved vessel segment, the angle of insonation varies through a range of 5°–65° over a short stretch, making it dicult to accurately determine the Doppler angle for calculating ow velocity. Left color ow image and corresponding Doppler waveform: Velocity measurement in a very tortuous internal carotid artery (ICA). With the sample volume positioned in the curved segment (to conrm or rule out clinically suspected kinking stenosis), a maximum peak systolic velocity (PSV) of 88cm/s and a peak end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of 24cm/s were calculated with a Doppler angle of 5° (top drawing). Right color ow image and waveform: With an assumed Doppler angle of 65°, a PSV of 191cm/s and an EDV of 41cm/s were calculated in the curvature of the vessel (bottom drawing)
of diameters to be less severe than the underestimation reported for the inner-to-inner-edge method (ITI) (Smith
1984). Moreover, use of the LTL method systematizes the unavoidable measurement error, thereby improving the reproducibility of measurements.
Diameter variations during the cardiac cycle can be taken into account by measuring both systolic and diastolic diam­eters (in the time-motion mode) and considering them in the ow volume calculation with dierent weightings (1/3 systole +2/3 diastole).
Other parameters that characterize blood ow are the pulsatility index (PI) and the resistive index (RI) according to Pourcelot. ese indices have the advantage that they are not dependent on the Doppler angle of insonation. e resistive
65°
indices, in particular the Pourcelot index, reect wall elastic­ity as well as the peripheral resistance of the organ supplied (. Fig.1.28c, d).
e Pourcelot index increases with peripheral resistance, while end-diastolic velocity (EDV) decreases. Stenosis or occlusion in peripheral arteries with triphasic ow alters the Doppler waveform and hence the Pourcelot index. It can thus serve as a semiquantitative parameter for estimating the degree of stenosis. In an artery supplying a parenchymal organ, a relevant decrease in the Pourcelot index between the prestenotic and the poststenotic segment can be inter­preted as indicating hemodynamically signicant stenosis, for instance, when examining a patient with suspected renal artery stenosis.
20
p
cm/
cm/s
Error in calculating volume flow rate
Vessel diameter
2mm
Chapter 1 · Fundamental Principles
V
1
d
s
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0102030405060 cm/s
. Fig. 1.24 In vitro ow measurement by duplex ultrasound.
Comparison of mean ow velocity determined by duplex ultrasound (Vd) and volumetry (Vp). Dierent ow proles were generated by two precision pumps (I and II). The mean axis shift of 3.75cm/s with shift of the zero line was due to a software error and was corrected by the manufacturer following these experiments. Vp=mean actual ow velocity calculated from volumetrically determined ow rate/ cross-sectional area of the tube; Vd=mean ow velocity determined by duplex ultrasound (mean of ve individual measurements) (Schäberle and Seitz 1991)
y = 1.13x + 3.48
Pump I:
1st measurement 2nd measurement
Pump II:
y = x + 3.9
r = 0.99
r = 0.97
V
. Fig. 1.26 Spectral Doppler waveform from the superior mesenteric
artery (bottom) obtained with adequate settings and the correspond­ing curve of mean ow velocities over time automatically computed by the ultrasound machine (top). The blood ow velocity averaged over three cardiac cycles is 31cm/s
%
100
80
60
40
0.2
20
0
02 46 8101
1.0 mm Error
0.5
200
150
100
80
. Fig. 1.25 Peak systolic velocities (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities
(EDV) measured in the superior mesenteric artery of fasting subjects on two successive days (n=28)
PSV
cm/s
40
30
20
10
. Fig. 1.27 Errors in volume ow rate calculation resulting from
dierent measurement accuracies in determining vessel diameter (forerrors ranging from 0.2 to 1.0mm)
1.1.3 Physical Principles ofColor-Coded
Duplex Ultrasound
1.1.3.1 Velocity Mode
Color duplex ultrasound combines the presentation of two­dimensional (2D) morphologic information with super­imposed ow data of a dened area displayed in color. e frame rate is much lower for the color-coded 2D display
EDV
of ow information than for the conventional (black-and­white) display because it takes much longer to compute the 2D distribution of ow.
In conventional duplex ultrasound, a small gate (sample
volume) is dened in the real-time gray-scale image for
1.1 · Technical Principles ofDiagnostic Ultrasound
D (Ieading edge)
21
1
a
kHz
A
Pulsatility index (PI):
kHz
A
Pourcelot index:
. Fig. 1.28a–d Vessel diameter measurement and resistive indices. a Diagram illustrating the three main methods of sonographic vessel diam-
eter measurement (left part of drawing): The diameter can be measured from the outer wall to the outer wall (outer-to- outer-edge method, OTO, blue arrows), from the inner wall to the inner wall (inner-to-inner-edge method, ITI, white arrows), or from the outer wall reection closest to the transducer to the reection from the opposite inner wall (leading-edge-to-leading-edge method, LTL, downward arrows). The LTL method mini­mizes and standardizes overestimation of vessel diameters due to blooming. b Measurement of the diameter of the superior mesenteric artery (MS) using the leading-edge method: The images illustrate how the vessel wall is overemphasized as a result of the blooming eect. Systolic­diastolic variation in diameter: the gray-scale scan on the left coincidentally depicts the maximum systolic extension of 7.8mm, while the time­motion display shows the variation in diameter from 7.8mm in systole to 6.9mm in diastole. c Diagrams of resistive indices. The Pourcelot index is calculated from peak systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDVs), while the pulsatility index (PI) can only be calculated when the system’s software allows calculation of time-averaged velocity (TAV). d The Pourcelot index, which is typically used in the spectral Doppler evaluation of parenchymal organ blood ow, is dependent on the patient’s heart rate. In subjects with tachycardia, EDVs are cut o, resulting in a lower Pource­lot index than in patients with bradycardia and the same peripheral resistance. The variation in heart rate and the resulting eect on the Pourcelot index is illustrated here by the waveform from the external carotid artery (ECA) obtained in a patient with occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and absolute arrhythmia: EDV decreases with the length of diastole. In this patient, arrhythmia results in Pourcelot indices that dier by more than 10% (0.89 and 0.79, calculated from EDVs of 6.7cm/s and 12.5cm/s) (see . Fig. 5.25)
mean
A–B
mean
mean
B
A–B
A
b
dc