Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5760_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
324
ICA
EC
Chapter 5 · Extracranial Cerebral Arteries
. Table 5.9 Multiparametric approach using a set of primary and secondary criteria for grading the severity of internal carotid artery (ICA)
stenosis using duplex ultrasound (Modied according to Neale etal. 1994; Faught etal. 1994; Moneta etal. 1995; AbuRahmaetal.1998;
Grant etal. 2003; and Arning etal. 2010). Later Investigators using the NASCET criteria for grading ICA stenosis propose lower threshold
velocities: PSV of 130 cm/s for 50% stenosis and 230 cm/s for 70% stenosis (AbuRahma et al. 2011; Jahromi et al. 2005)
Distal degree (NASCET) (%) 10 20–40 50 60 70 80 90 Occlusion
Local degree (ECST) (%) 45 50–60 70 75 80 90 95 Occlusion
Primary
criteria
5
Secondary
criteria
Number of plus signs indicates diagnostic relevance (compared with other criteria)
ACA anterior cerebral artery, CCA common carotid artery, EDV end-diastolic velocity, ICA internal carotid artery, PSV peak systolic velocity
1. B-mode image +++ +
2. Color duplex image + +++ + + + + + +++
3. PSV at the site of maximum stenosis (cm/s)
4. PSV in the poststenotic segment (cm/s)
5. (Beginning) collateralization (periorbital arteries/ACA)
6. Decrease in diastolic velocity in the prestenotic segment (CCA)
7. Abnormal ow in the postste­notic segment
8. EDV at the site of maximum stenosis (cm/s)
9. Confetti sign (+) ++ ++
10. Carotid stenosis index (ICA/CCA PSV ratio)
<100 120–160 >200 >250 >300 >350–
400
>50 <50 <30 No ow
(+) ++ +++ +++
(+) ++ +++ +++
+ + ++ +++ (+)
<50 <90 <100 >100 >100
2 3 4 4.5
200– 500
No ow signal
signal
A
A
C
B
CCA
D
. Fig. 5.23 Stenosis criteria for grading internal carotid artery (ICA)
stenosis. A=peak systolic velocity (PSV) within the stenosis (the most reliable parameter based on scientic evidence); C=peak end-diastolic velocity (EDV) in the stenosis; A/B=ratio of intrastenotic PSV in the ICA and PSV in the common carotid artery (CCA); C/D=ratio of peak EDV in the stenosis and peak EDV in the CCA
. Table 5.10 Pitfalls in carotid stenosis grading due to other
factors aecting peak systolic velocity (PSV)
Stenosis grading Factor/Source of error
Underestimation of stenosis (of risk of embolism)
Overestimation of stenosis
Episode of low blood pressure Proximal stenosis, e.g., aortic stenosis Very-high-grade stenosis, subtotal occlusion Long stenosis Tandem stenosis (additional distal/ intracranial stenosis) Very eccentric stenosis
High blood pressure at time of examination Hyperperfusion (contralateral carotid occlusion or very-high-grade stenosis) Very pulsatile ow (medial sclerosis in diabetes mellitus) Small or contracted vessels Very short stenosis
ab
cd
700
Flow velocity (cm/s)
100
Local degree of stenosis (%)
5.6 · Ultrasound Criteria, Measurement Parameters, andDiagnostic Role
325
5
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0
Poststenotic flow velocity in ICA
120
cm/s
90
60
30
N = 105
0
40
50
Degree of stenosis (%)
60
70 80 90
Local diameter reduction (%)
r = 0.89
100
Peak systolic velocity (cm/s)
600
Intrastenotic PSV
480
360
240
120
0
30
Peak systolic velocity (cm/s)
600
480
360
240
120
0
30
40
40
50
50
60
60
70 80
Degree of stenosis (%)
£ 0.5 cm
> 4 cm
70 80 90
90 100
1–2 cm
. Fig. 5.24 a Internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis: relationship between angiographic stenosis and intrastenotic peak systolic velocity (PSV)
for calculating the distal degree of stenosis (. Fig.5.7b) (From Moneta etal. 1995); dierences in plaque morphology are one factor contribut­ing to scatter (see . Fig.5.27). b Flow velocity (PSV) as a function of stenosis severity (local degree). Intrastenotic PSV increases continuously with luminal diameter reduction (according to the continuity equation) and degreases again in very-high-grade stenosis/subtotal occlusion due to friction loss, especially when a long carotid segment is stenosed. c Distribution of poststenotic PSV as a function of local diameter reduction. Poststenotic PSV tends to decrease when the degree of stenosis is at least approx. 85% (According to Görtler etal. 1994). d Relationship between the length of stenotic plaque (length of stenosis) and expected maximum PSV as a function of stenosis severity. When a long high-grade ste­nosis is present, friction loss may lead to a lower PSV in the stenotic jet than would be expected from the degree of stenosis. This association is especially important when luminal narrowing is due to dissection. However, the actual decrease in PSV to be expected also depends on plaque conguration and has not been investigated systematically (According to Widder 2004)
Color duplex ultrasound performed with properly
adjusted settings (gain, PRF) allows qualitative evaluation but no grading of carotid artery stenosis. e color mode may help in dierentiating plaque from owing blood in the patent lumen but reliable determination of the degree of luminal narrowing is not possible due to inherent method­ological limitations, especially in transverse orientation (see
7 Sect. 1.2.3). Color ow images may also facilitate dieren-
tiation of subtotal and total occlusion.
Poststenotic PSV should be measured as far crani-
ally as possible (distal to the stenosis jet). It is decreased in high- grade stenosis (poststenotic PSV >50 cm/s in <70% stenosis (NASCET) versus <30cm/s in >90% stenosis) (see
. Table5.9). Comparison of poststenotic PSV with the con-
tralateral side is advisable.
Presence of collateral circulation can point to carotid
stenosis. Abnormal ow (reversed ow direction, reduced ow) in the supratrochlear artery is a sign of high-grade ICA stenosis. Collateralization is more reliably detected intracranially using transcranial duplex ultrasound. A vari­ety of arteries can be recruited to bridge a stenosed carotid artery; therefore, identication of a single collateral with increased ow taken alone is not a reliable indicator of carotid stenosis. In most examinations, searching for col­laterals is not necessary or helpful for estimating stenosis severity.
ICA
ICA
ab
Chapter 5 · Extracranial Cerebral Arteries
326
III
I
II
CCA
CCA
5
B
A
. Fig. 5.25 a Unilateral high-grade internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis or occlusion (left diagram) leads to an increase in flow velocity in the
contralateral common and internal carotid arteries if they function as the primary collateral pathway; this must be borne in mind in stenosis grading (diagrams from Widder and Görtler 2004). b Because end-diastolic velocity (EDV ) decreases with the duration of diastole, stenosis grading on the basis of EDV is dependent on a patient’s heart rate (as well as other systemic factors such as blood pressure at the time of mea­surement, contralateral occlusion, wall elasticity). As a consequence, resistance indices, which incorporate EDV, also vary with heart rate (see
. Fig. 1.28c, d)
Secondary Stenosis Criteria (
z
Reduced diastolic ow velocity in the common carotid artery (CCA)
: Flow velocity in the CCA, particularly during diastole, decreases when higher-grade ICA stenosis is pres­ent. Pulsatility increases prestenotically, and the CCA ow prole becomes more like that of the ECA (externalization). e increase in pulsatility is determined not only by the degree of ICA stenosis but also by the number of ECA branches recruited as collaterals: the stenosis-related increase in pulsatility is damped more markedly when more ECA branches provide collateral ow. e ECA waveform thus becomes less pulsatile, i.e., more like that of the ICA (inter­nalization), which in turn aects the ow pattern in the CCA.
Turbulent ow is oen more conspicuous acoustically
(like foodsteps on gravel) than visually in the waveform. Transition from normal laminar to turbulent ow occurs at sites of stenotic narrowing when the Reynolds number exceeds 2000 and in the poststenotic segment (sudden wid­ening of the lumen with ow separation). e occurrence of turbulent ow depends not only on stenosis severity but also strongly on plaque conguration and surface.
Intrastenotic end-diastolic velocity (EDV) increases
with the severity of carotid stenosis. An EDV of >50cm/s suggests that at least 50% stenosis is present with velocities >80–100cm/s suggesting high-grade stenosis (>70%). is parameter is especially useful for quantifying subtotal occlu­sion, in which PSV is more dicult to determine (Carpenter et al. 1996). Note, though, that EDV increases with the patient’s heart rate because a higher heart rate means a shorter end-diastolic phase (. Fig.5.25b).
. Table5.9)
Perivascular tissue vibration occurs in the so tissues
around higher-grade carotid stenosis. is phenomenon can cause what is known as the confetti sign in color duplex imaging (adequate gain and PRF) or can be auscultated because the tissues vibrate at audible frequencies.
Carotid stenosis index or ratio of PSV in the ICA to that
in the ipsilateral CCA (ICA/CCA PSV ratio): Absolute ow velocities are inuenced by physiologic and abnormal sys­temic factors (hypertension, aortic valve stenosis, medial sclerosis, contralateral occlusion, intracranial collateraliza­tion). e eect of these factors can be reduced by calculating the ratio of PSV in the stenosis to PSV in the prestenotic seg­ment of the same vascular territory (Moneta et al. 1993; Howton etal. 2008; Carpenter etal. 1995). However, as the ECA also arises from the CCA, the ratio will be altered if the ECA is stenosed or acts as a collateral in the presence of ICA stenosis (
Ratio of intrastenotic to poststenotic systolic velocity
(PSV) in the ICA
degrees of stenosis (risk of embolism) can be associated with dierent intrastenotic and above all poststenotic velocities, depending on the length of the stenosis (. Fig.5.24d). In a long (high-grade) stenosis, friction losses result in a lower intrastenotic PSV.To account for the resulting error in steno­sis grading, it has been proposed to calculate the ratio of intrastenotic to poststenotic velocity, preferably using intensity- weighted mean ow velocities rather than PSV.A cuto of 5 is assumed to indicate higher-grade carotid steno­sis (Ranke etal. 1999; . Table5.11). is parameter is con­sidered unreliable and is used very rarely.
III
II
I
. Figs.5.23 and 5.25).
(see 7 Sect. 1.2.3 and . Fig. 1.48): Identical
PI » 2
PI » 1
PI » 0.7
5.6 · Ultrasound Criteria, Measurement Parameters, andDiagnostic Role
327
. Table 5.11 Sensitivity, specicity, and accuracy of duplex ultrasound in internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis grading using dierent
sonographic criteria (angiography as reference standard). Some studies report local (ECST) degrees of carotid stenosis, while others report distal (NASCET) degrees of stenosis (see . Fig.5.9b). Some authors provide no information on the method of stenosis grading used
Author Year N Method (parameter) Results
5
Degree of stenosis (%)
Faught etal. 1994 70 130 93
Polak etal. 1992 50 125 83
Huston etal. 2000 915 50 130 70 1.6 92 90 90 91 91
915 70 230 3.2 86 90 83 92 89
Soulez etal. 1999 70 94 81 62 98
60 2.9 94 80 72 96
AbuRahma etal.
Grant etal. 2000 70 225 90
Carpenter etal.
Hood etal. 1996 457 70 230 100 78 97 88 94 93
Carpenter etal.
Browman etal.
Moneta etal. 1995 176 60 260 70 3.2–
Neale etal. 1994 60 70 270 110 96 91 93
Moneta etal. 1993 70 325 130 4 83 90 80 92 88
Eckstein etal. 2001 68 70 (ECST) 180 92 42 82 67 79
Finkenzeller etal.
1998 50 140 92 95 97 89 93
60 150 65 82 97 96 86 90
70 180 96 85 95 91 92 92
1996 110 70 210 94 77 68 96 83
110 70 70 92 60 73 86 77
110 70 3.3 100 65 65 100 79
1995 60 230 98 87 88 98 92
60 40 97 52 86 86 86
60 2.0 97 73 78 96 76
60 230 40 2.0 100 100 100 100 100
1995 75 70 175 91 60
2008 21 50 120 50 1.5 Correlation with IADSA, r=0.852 (Pearson)
70 200 100 2.0
PSV (cm/s)
EDV (cm/s)
PSV ratio
3.5
Sensitiv­ity (%)
84 94 92 88 90
Specic­ity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
Accu­racy (%)
EDV end-diastolic velocity, IADSA intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, PSV peak systolic velocity
Stenosis Grading Using the Primary
z
and Secondary Criteria
Degrees of Carotid Stenosis
(. Table5.9, . Figs.5.20, 5.21,
5.22, 5.23, and 5.24):
5 Low-grade stenosis (<20–40% by NASCET criteria) and
plaque morphology are evaluated by B-mode ultra-
sound. While a slight increase in intrastenotic ow velocity may be apparent in the Doppler waveform or color duplex images, the increase is not hemodynami­cally relevant and precludes quantication.
5 Moderate stenosis (50% NASCET/70% ECST) is associ-
ated with a PSV of up to 200cm/s. Whether turbulent
328
Chapter 5 · Extracranial Cerebral Arteries
ow occurs depends on plaque conguration. e carotid stenosis index may be increased above 2, while the other parameters are unaected or the changes are not diagnostically meaningful.
5 Moderate to high-grade stenosis (60% NASCET) causes
local ow acceleration with color aliasing and a PSV of up to 250cm/s. ere may be turbulent ow and beginning signs of perivascular tissue vibration.
5 High-grade stenosis (70% NASCET) is associated with
aliasing, a PSV of up to 300cm/s, and beginning eects
5
on secondary criteria (collateral ow, supratrochlear artery). Turbulent ow is apparent, the confetti sign may be seen, and intrastenotic EDV is increased (>100cm/s).
5 High- to very-high-grade stenosis (80%) leads to even
more marked changes compared with high-grade stenosis (PSV of 350–400cm/s, carotid stenosis index of >4). Poststenotic velocity is decreased.
5 Subtotal occlusion (90%) is associated with a further
increase in intrastenotic PSV; on the other hand, intrastenotic PSV may be lower due to greater friction loss (PSV range of 200–500cm/s). With very high receive gain, it is oen possible to capture the low-ampli­tude, high-frequency jet components. e diagnosis of subtotal ICA occlusion is corroborated by a decrease in poststenotic ow velocity (<30cm/s) and an increase in CCA pulsatility.
5 Occlusion of the ICA is characterized by the absence of
ow signals (color duplex and waveform) throughout the extracranial ICA.Sonographic evaluation should extend to the skull base in order not to miss pseudo­occlusion (see, however, persistent primitive hypoglossal artery (PPHA),
7 Sect. 5.6.1.3.1). In addition, ow in the
CCA is decreased and becomes more pulsatile; and collateral circulation can be demonstrated.
overestimation in these situations, a higher PSV cuto of 140–150cm/s should be used to discriminate between low­grade and hemodynamically signicant (>20–40%) carotid artery stenosis (modied according to AbuRahma et al.
1995). Not taking these factors into account will lead to false­positive results and overestimation of carotid stenosis (Hor­row etal. 2000; Busuttil etal. 1996).
In the study of Busuttil etal. (1996), duplex ultrasound overestimated the degree of carotid stenosis in patients with severe contralateral disease, falsely suggesting high-grade stenosis in 27% of cases (using angiography as the reference). Following unilateral carotid endarterectomy (CEA), PSV on the unoperated side decreased on average by 36cm/s. Other investigators reported a 20–40% higher PSV due to compen­satory ow in patients with over 90% contralateral stenosis (Henderson etal. 2000).
e compensatory increase in PSV is determined not only by the severity of contralateral stenosis but also by the contribution of the ICA to collateral circulation and by the recruitment of other collaterals (ipsilateral ECA and supra­trochlear artery, posterior circulation).
In another study including 107 patients with asymptomatic 50–99% contralateral carotid artery stenosis (PSV >125cm/s), a postoperative duplex examination showed a mean decrease in PSV of 48 cm/s (10%) and a mean decrease in EDV of 36 cm/s (19%) (Abou-Zamzam et al. 2000). e authors concluded that patients with severe bilateral carotid stenosis
should be restudied with duplex scanning after the rst operation before undergoing CEA of the contralateral side.
Pitfalls in carotid stenosis grading
(. Table 5.10)
include:
5 Acoustic shadowing due to long calcied plaque (>2cm)
precludes measurement of intrastenotic PSV (rotation of
transducer to avoid areas of acoustic shadowing, see
. Fig.5.4)
5 Plaque conguration: very eccentric plaque with little
Critical Appraisal of PSV: The Main Criterion of Carotid
z
Stenosis
e parameters for grading internal carotid artery (ICA) ste­nosis outlined above have accuracies of 83–97% using intra­arterial angiography as the gold standard. Several studies found good interobserver agreement both for grading ICA stenosis (kappa=0.7) and for identifying candidates for sur­gery (kappa=0.72; Griths etal. 2001). When the degree of carotid stenosis determined using absolute parameters pro­vides no denitive basis for recommending surgery, eects of systemic conditions such as hypertension or hypercircula­tion (fever, hyperthyroidism) should be considered
. Table 5.10). Medial sclerosis in long-standing diabetes
( mellitus leads to pulsatile ow with a larger systolic compo­nent and a smaller diastolic component. Contralateral carotid artery occlusion (. Fig. 5.25) or high-grade stenosis and multiple-vessel disease with vertebral artery involvement may also lead to articially elevated ow velocities (Busuttil etal. 1996) in the carotid system; another factor to be consid­ered in interpreting carotid blood ow velocities is collateral­ization (see . Figs. 5.68 and 5.69 (both Atlas)). To avoid
hemodynamic eect (relatively low PSV) but high risk of
embolism due to plaque thickness (. Figs.5.15, 5.27,
and 5.57e (Atlas))
5 Presence of bilateral higher-grade stenosis (PSV
overestimates stenosis because collateral function results
in higher PSV than expected on the basis of the degree
of stenosis alone;
. Figs.5.68 and 5.69 (both Atlas)) or
presence of tandem stenosis (PSV underestimates ICA
stenosis, even if the second stenosis is in the aorta)
5 PSV underestimates the degree of long stenosis
(. Fig.5.24d)
5 High bifurcation: carotid bulb and proximal ICA cannot
be insonated adequately (switching to a curved-array
transducer with small footprint may help)
5 Mistaking occlusion for pseudo-occlusion in individuals
with relling of the ICA through a PPHA (. Fig.5.31)
5 Recanalization of ICA occlusion (. Fig.5.30) 5 Carotid aneurysm with thrombosis as source of embo-
lism (. Fig.5.72 (Atlas))
5 Carotid dissection (. Figs.5.44 and 5.45) 5 Vasculitis (. Fig.5.46)
5.6 · Ultrasound Criteria, Measurement Parameters, andDiagnostic Role
329
5
Normal blood ow velocity is higher in the thinner vessels of slim patients or arteries narrowed by other factors such as temporary vascular contraction compared with the velocities determined in a general population. is will then translate into higher PSV in a stenotic segment (. Fig.5.49 (Atlas)).
As already mentioned, a long high-grade stenosis (in par­ticular a stenosis of >3 cm) will cause a less pronounced increase in PSV than a shorter stenosis of the same degree (. Fig.5.24d). e thresholds dened in investigations using angiography as the gold standard are usually based on the most common stenosis length of 1–2cm. According to the Hagen-Poiseuille law, ow resistance also depends on the
length of the narrowed segment. A very short stenosis will
cause a more marked increase in PSV, and this is why the length of the stenosis has to be considered in stenosis grading as well (although no detailed study-based data exist).
An intracranial stenosis of the carotid territory occurring
in tandem with an extracranial ICA stenosis reduces extra-
cranial ow velocity, resulting in a less marked increase in PSV across the extracranial stenosis (stenosis mismatch). A tandem lesion with high-grade intracranial stenosis may be suggested:
5 if ow velocity in the distal extracranial ICA is markedly
lower than would be expected from the degree of
upstream stenosis and
5 if ow is more pulsatile than expected (
. Table5.10).
Some authors prefer measurement of end-diastolic velocity for stenosis grading, arguing that this parameter is less aected by the patient’s blood pressure at the time of the examination. Nevertheless, data from comparative studies still show PSV to be the most reliable velocity parameter for stenosis grading since EDV varies with the patient’s heart rate and other systemic factors (. Fig.5.25b). Repeated mea­surement of constant blood ow in the same vessel at increas­ing heart rates would yield increasingly higher EDVs due to shortening of the cardiac cycle, resulting in an articially lower resistive index (RI).
e eects of systemic factors such as hypertensive epi­sodes or greater pulsatility due to reduced wall elasticity can be minimized by calculating the ratio of PSV in the ICA to that in the ipsilateral CCA (ICA/CCA PSV ratio or carotid stenosis index) for stenosis grading. is ratio can be deter­mined as a supplementary parameter whenever absolute PSV suggests a borderline stenosis and it is assumed that the mea­surement was inuenced by systemic factors.
e compilation of studies in
. Table 5.11 shows that
accuracy rates of over 90% can be achieved in stenosis grad­ing on the basis of the hemodynamic parameters derived from duplex ultrasound (using angiography as the gold stan­dard). Hence, the accuracy of duplex imaging is comparable to the interobserver variability between two radiologists evaluating the same angiograms (. Tables 5.12 and 5.13). Taken together, published data indicate that ultrasound achieves consistently good results with sensitivities and spec­icities of approximately 90% in detecting greater than 70% carotid artery stenosis (relevant for identifying surgical can-
. Table 5.12 Agreement between two independent
radiologists in identifying and classifying hemodynamically signicant carotid artery stenosis on angiography
Author/year Agreement between two indepen-
dent radiologists (%)
Croft etal. 1980 88
Moneta etal. 1993 93
. Table 5.13 Accuracy of angiography in comparison with
pathologic workup of surgical specimens
Author/year Accuracy of angiography compared
with pathology (%)
Croft etal. 1980 79
didates). For carotid stenoses of 50–70%, several studies and a meta-analysis of 41 studies investigating dierent imaging modalities in comparison with intra-arterial digital subtrac­tion angiography (IADSA) found sensitivities for duplex sonography that were 5–30% lower but specicities of over 90% (Wardlaw etal. 2006). An explanation for these results is not apparent from the meta-analysis, but the use of dierent criteria (threshold velocities) for dening hemodynamically relevant stenosis (50% stenosis or greater), systemic factors (blood pressure, wall elasticity), and dierent hemodynamic eects of eccentric versus concentric plaques (
. Fig.5.27b)
appear to be contributing factors.
e question regarding the most valid velocity parameter for the grading of carotid artery stenosis– PSV, EDV, or ICA/ CCA PSV ratio– still remains open. Published data yield no uniform picture and the heterogeneity of study designs makes results dicult to compare.
A study of the ICA PSV/CCA PSV ratio determined by duplex ultrasound in more than 300 carotid artery examina­tions with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis found good accuracy for the detection of 70–99% NASCET stenosis using a cuto of 4 (Moneta etal. 1993). Other inves­tigators achieved good accuracies with dierent cutos (. Table5.11).
Nevertheless, PSV has turned out to be the most reliable velocity parameter in detecting and quantifying high-grade carotid artery stenosis, showing consistently high accuracy in many studies (Arning etal. 2003; Lal etal. 2004; Lewis and Wardlaw 2002) (. Table5.11). If the ultrasound exami- nation is technically adequate, patients in whom higher­grade stenosis is diagnosed can be scheduled for surgery without additional imaging tests for stenosis grading (Grant etal. 2003; Lewis and Wardlaw 2002). e decision to rec­ommend carotid endarterectomy (CEA) always involves weighing the predicted risk of future vascular events against perioperative and postoperative morbidity/mortality. Vari­ous attempts at dening the best PSV cuto for identifying
330
Chapter 5 · Extracranial Cerebral Arteries
hemodynamically relevant stenosis (>50%) by means of ROC curve analysis in studies using angiography as the ref­erence standard show that a higher PSV improves specicity, albeit at the cost of sensitivity; conversely, a lower cuto velocity improves sensitivity but lowers the specicity of the method (see . Fig. 6.9: ROC analysis for determining the cuto velocity for renal artery stenosis; . Fig. 2.19: for pro­funda femoris stenosis). is situation is impressively illus­trated by a study of Moneta etal. (1995), who investigated dierent PSV cutos for identifying 60–99% carotid artery
5
stenosis in a larger patient population. A PSV cuto of 200cm/s yielded high sensitivity of 93% but poor specicity of 76% (84% accuracy), while a cuto of 300cm/s resulted in low sensitivity of 78% and high specicity of 95% (87% accu­racy). e best compromise was to use a PSV cuto of 260cm/s, which yielded the highest accuracy of 88% with 86% sensitivity and 91% specicity.
Using a combination of PSV >260 cm/s and EDV >70cm/s, Moneta etal. achieved 84% sensitivity, 94% speci­city, 92% positive predictive value, and 90% accuracy in discriminating 60–99% stenosis. Similar results were obtained with an ICA/CCA PSV ratio>3.2 (
. Table5.11). In
. Fig. 5.26 Severe kinking (acute angle) of the internal carotid artery
(ICA) can cause stenosis. However, in a kinked segment, stenosis grad­ing is limited because Doppler angle correction is dicult to accom­plish, and additional parameters such as turbulent ow need to be used to corroborate the diagnosis. In the example, a PSV of 135cm/s is measured in the kinked distal ICA.This PSV suggests 30–40% stenosis (by NASCET criteria, equivalent to 50–60% ECST stenosis)
asymptomatic patients, the statistical benet of prophylactic CEA is smaller, and the number needed to treat to prevent one stroke is higher than is the case for patients with symp­tomatic carotid stenosis. For this reason it has been proposed that velocity thresholds with a higher positive predictive value be used in asymptomatic patients. For an intrastenotic PSV cuto of 290cm/s combined with an EDV of 80cm/s, the authors reported a 95% positive predictive value for 60–99% asymptomatic ICA stenosis (angiography).
Technical advances and the advent of high-resolution transducers led to improved sensitivities and specicities of
90–95%
in correctly identifying hemodynamically signi­cant carotid artery stenosis. e correlation of intra-arterial angiography and color-coded duplex imaging is 0.8–0.9 (Faught etal. 1994; Sitzer etal. 1993).
Despite these good results, some caution is in order in view of the range of PSV cutos proposed for dening hemo­dynamically relevant stenosis (Elgersma etal. 1998) and the scatter apparent in
. Fig. 5.24a. In one study, PSV values
ranging from 50 to 530cm/s were measured for 70% angio­graphic stenosis (Hunink etal. 1993). is variation cannot be fully explained by measurement errors and failure to take the hemodynamic eects of dierent plaque congurations (. Fig.5.27) into account.
Because carotid stenosis grading based on PSV cutos alone is prone to errors, the German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (Deutsche Gesellscha für Ultraschall in der Med­izin, DEGUM) advocates a multiparmatric approach using the set of primary and secondary criteria discussed above (7 Sect. 5.6.1.2.1 and . Table5.9). Several decades of sono­graphic and vascular surgical experience from the clinician’s perspective conrm that this sonographic approach allows reliable preoperative carotid stenosis grading (Khaw 1997). e practice is dierent in North America, where carotid ultrasound examinations are performed by sonographers
and PSV alone is used for stenosis grading. e dierent phi­losophies necessarily result in dierent recommendations regarding PSV cutos: while the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) recommends one standardized PSV cuto to detect all carotid stenoses >70%, the DEGUM advo­cates a more exible approach based on PSV measurement in conjunction with additional parameters (
. Fig.5.24b).
Despite the variation in ow velocities measured for a given angiographic degree of stenosis and despite the pitfalls in determining PSV discussed above, it is safe to conclude that there is good overall agreement between hemodynamic stenosis quantication by duplex ultrasound and angio­graphic stenosis grading (. Tables 5.10, 5.11, 5.12, and 5.13).
Another aspect worth mentioning here is that a study investigating ultrasound machines from dierent manufac­turers in a phantom model of predened ow velocities found dierences in ow velocity measurements on the order of 5–10% (Fillinger et al. 1996). is is another issue that tends to be overlooked when discussing dierences in reported scientic data.
Atherosclerotic elongation of the ICA leads to tortuosity, kinking, and coiling due to the limited space available between the carotid bulb and the base of the skull. Such changes typically do not require treatment and are oen inci­dental ndings that impair duplex ultrasound evaluation. Only kinking stenosis, especially when symptomatic, should be operated on (see
. Fig.5.51 (Atlas)).
Even severe kinks or coils will produce a stenosis only if the artery takes a sharp turn; they may however impair ow velocity measurements due to the diculty of achieving an adequate Doppler angle. erefore, indirect criteria such as
turbulent ow
must be considered as well (. Fig.5.26). In severe ICA kinking, the degree of luminal narrowing may vary with dierent functional positions of the cervical spine.
=plaque
CD
=lumen
a
b
5.6 · Ultrasound Criteria, Measurement Parameters, andDiagnostic Role
331
5
Most stenoses at the origin of the ICA (bulb), the most
common site of carotid stenosis, are due to atherosclerosis.
Plaque
A
Distal carotid stenosis is rare and typically has other underly­ing causes such as bromuscular dysplasia, wall dissection (usually due to trauma), or kinking.
B
A
C
B
Collateralization also aects the risk of embolism in
steno-occlusive carotid disease. Intrastenotic PSV in an 80–90% stenosis is lower when there is good collateralization
D
Plaque
as opposed to the same degree of stenosis in a patient with poor collateral pathways. Lower intrastenotic velocities reduce the risk of embolism because wall shear stress is lower.
e poststenotic ICA diameter is another prognostic fac-
tor
. When a high-grade ICA stenosis develops slowly, the
plaques
Eccentric plaquesConcentric
decrease in blood supply is compensated for by the recruit­ment of collaterals. As a result, carotid blood ow on the side of stenosis is decreased. A subgroup analysis of the ECST shows that a reduced poststenotic ICA lumen has important prognostic implications for patients with high-grade stenosis (Rothwell etal. 2000). In this analysis, patients with postste-
50% diameter 75% area
50% diameter 50% area
50% diameter 50% diameter <50% area >50% to <75%
area
notic narrowing of the ICA dened as an ICA/CCA ratio of <0.42 (which usually means <3mm) had a two thirds lower stroke rate than patients with similar stenosis severity but without narrowing at 5-year follow-up. e authors assume that poststenotic narrowing may be protective as blood ow distal to the stenosis is insucient to carry emboli to the brain.
For the reasons outlined before, color ow imaging (color duplex or power mode) is inaccurate for stenosis quantica­tion (diameter reduction in longitudinal plane or
sectional area reduction in transverse plane
) on the basis
cross-
of the width of color-coded ow relative to the lumen diam­eter at the site of maximum stenosis. e inherent method­ological limitations (angle dependence of the ow signal) can be overcome by using the B-ow technique, which allows better dierentiation of owing blood from the vessel wall or plaque because of its superior discrimination of echoes from mobile and stationary reectors. A small study (21 patients) evaluated the performance of dierent imaging techniques in discriminating 50–95% stenosis (by NASCET criteria) com­pared with intra-arterial DSA, which served as the gold stan­dard. In this study,
B-ow imaging (see . Fig.5.86) showed
the highest correlation (Pearson) with DSA (R= 0.94), fol­lowed by contrast- enhanced MRI (1.5 Tesla, standard coil; R = 0.9117), color duplex ultrasound, and reconstructed contrast-enhanced CT (both R= 0.85) (Finkenzeller et al.
2008). Note, however, that plaque evaluability in both B-mode and B-ow imaging crucially depends on plaque morphology, in particular on the presence of calcication. e accuracy of stenosis grading with B-ow imaging decreases with the severity of calcication.
Inherent Methodological Dierences Between
z
Ultrasound and Angiography
. Fig. 5.27 a Eccentric luminal narrowing can vary widely in appear-
ance and suggest dierent degrees of stenosis, depending on the imaging plane (angiography and B-mode ultrasound). The diagrams illustrate how the same plaque can lead to dierent estimates of the degree of stenosis caused by it: A: 0%, B: approx. 50%, C: approx. 70%, D: 100%. This source of misinterpretation results from the reduction of the three-dimensional vascular lesion to the two-dimensional imaging plane. Color duplex facilitates evaluation of eccentric plaques, which, if possible, should be assessed in transverse and longitudinal orienta­tion. b Plaque morphology (concentric–eccentric) can lead to variable degrees of cross-sectional area reduction despite identical diameter reduction. Eccentric plaques are thicker than concentric ones, even when they cause the same degree of stenosis. Because they protrude into the lumen, eccentric plaques are exposed to greater shear stress (longitudinal pulsation) and are thus more susceptible to rupture and embolism. These two factors (reduction to two planes and dierences in plaque conguration) explain the discrepancies in stenosis quanti­cation between duplex ultrasound and angiography when eccentric plaques are present. Dierences in plaque conguration lead to problems when stenosis grading on the basis of hemodynamic criteria with duplex ultrasound is compared with angiography using diameter reduction as a morphologic criterion. For instance, a 50% diameter reduction measured angiographically and indicating a 50% stenosis corresponds to a 50% stenosis based on hemodynamic grading (expressed in terms of cross-sectional area reduction) when the plaque is eccentric, but to a 75% stenosis when the plaque is concentric. With duplex ultrasound, stenosis grading is based on hemodynamic criteria derived from the Doppler waveform. A cross-sectional area reduction of 75% results in a PSV (local grading method) of approx. 240cm/s (PSV ratio of 4) versus 120cm/s (PSV ratio of 2) for 50% area reduction (in peripheral arteries)), while the angiographic diameter reduction is 50% in both cases (local degree of stenosis). PSV ratio=prestenotic PSV/intrastenotic PSV; degree of stenosis=(1–1/PSV ratio)×100. The degree of stenosis determined hemodynamically is a more adequate marker of the severity of blood ow reduction (in relation to cross-area reduction). This is also relevant in evaluating peripheral or renal artery stenosis (see . Fig. 2.17)
e gold standard, angiography, also has pitfalls– even when the stenosis is evaluated in dierent projections and quanti­cation is done in the plane with the most severe luminal nar­rowing. Independent interpretations of the same angiograms by two radiologists show variation in accuracy ranging from
80% to 93%. from the fact that the 3D plaque is projected onto the 2D lm, where the resulting degree of narrowing varies with the imaging plane (. Fig.5.27a). In DSA, stenosis grading is also
Errors in angiographic stenosis grading arise
332
Chapter 5 · Extracranial Cerebral Arteries
inuenced by the concentration of contrast medium. More­over, plaques of dierent conguration which produce the same diameter reduction produce dierent reductions in the cross-sectional area. Hence, they dier in hemodynamic rel­evance, giving rise to dierent increases in PSV (. Fig.5.27b).
Angiography is based on the distal method of carotid ste­nosis grading. With this method, luminal narrowing of the ICA bulb on the order of 30% merely means that the lumen of the bulb is reduced to the width of the distal ICA, and no stenosis is diagnosed (. Fig.5.10).
5
In an analysis of 1001 angiograms of the ICA, 34% of ste­noses were classied as 70–99% stenoses by ESCT criteria versus only 16% by NASCET criteria (distal grading method) (Rothwell etal. 1994).
cranially to the level of the bifurcation. Dierentiation between subtotal and total ICA occlusion is important as sur­gery is usually only recommended for subtotal occlusion. Unfortunately, the ingrowth of vessels into the connective tissue of an organized occlusion makes it dicult to distin­guish the two. us, the depiction of color-coded ow signals in the ICA segment near the skull base indicating a patent lumen is the decisive criterion for establishing the dierential diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) may be helpful in dierentiating subtotal or pseudo-occlusion from true occlusion of the ICA.
Adjusting the scanner settings (low wall lter, low pulse
repetition frequency, high gain) is important for detecting slow ow and small blood volumes in pseudo-occlusion. With adequate settings, the absence of ow distal to the ath-
Stenoses of the Common Carotid Artery (CCA) and
z
External Carotid Artery (ECA)
Compared with the ICA, the ECA has a more pulsatile ow prole with a smaller diastolic component. Stenosis typically occurs at the ECA origin but becomes clinically relevant only in the presence of concomitant ICA occlusion and mainte­nance of brain perfusion via extracranial branches such as the supratrochlear artery or, very rarely, in patients with multiple-vessel disease and globally reduced perfusion of the brain with collateral pathways involving ECA branches. Due to the higher pulsatility of blood ow in the ECA, the PSV cuto should be higher than for the same degree of stenosis in the ICA; therefore, we may safely assume that a PSV of 250–300 cm/s suggests higher-grade ECA stenosis. Conse­quently, there is no need for ROC analysis to determine cut­os for grading ECA stenosis.
Stenosis of the CCA is rare. e most common sites of CCA stenosis are the origin of the artery from the aortic arch or from the brachiocephalic trunk and the distal CCA seg­ment just below the bifurcation. Between these two sites, CCA stenosis can be graded using the intrastenotic-to­prestenotic PSV ratio (see
. Fig.5.38a). In patients with sub-
total or total CCA occlusion, branches of the ECA (such as the superior thyroid artery) can be recruited to ensure blood ow to the ICA.Depending on the course of the collateral pathways, the ECA will show variable retrograde lling. e hemodynamic stenosis criteria for the CCA are the same as for the ICA.
erosclerotic lesion is the most reliable evidence of ICA occlu­sion. Since no vessels arise from the ICA extracranially, the Doppler waveform sampled far distal to the bulb (near skull base) provides the most reliable information for dierentia­tion, especially since there are no structures interfering with the Doppler signal (such as calcied plaques). Blood ow distal to a subtotal occlusion oen assumes a venous charac­ter with a slow systolic velocity in spectral Doppler analysis. Using these criteria, color duplex ultrasound has a positive predictive value of 92.5–96.7% (Kirsch etal. 1994).
B-mode imaging is not very reliable in detecting ICA occlusions, especially recent ones, when intraluminal struc­tures are still absent. Once transformation of the thrombus has occurred, occlusion may be identied in the B-mode by the presence of internal echoes from connective tissue in the shrunken lumen. However, an occluded artery is oen di­cult to distinguish from surrounding tissue.
When the ICA is occluded, even greater care is required so as
not to confuse the ICA and the ECA. In ICA occlusion,
the ECA supplies the brain (. Fig.5.61 (Atlas)) through the supratrochlear artery, resulting in a less pulsatile Doppler waveform with a larger diastolic component (. Figs.5.28 and
5.29). In this setting, the identity of the ECA must be con-
rmed by rhythmically tapping the temporal artery and looking for the transmitted pulsation (
. Fig. 5.28). is is
important to avoid making a mistake and localizing the occlusion to the ECA. Moreover, the examiner should be aware that, because ECA occlusion is typically short, the dis­tal ECA tends to be relled via collaterals. In this situation,
5.6.1.3 Occlusion
Occlusions of the carotid territory are chiey due to local thrombus formation secondary to stenosing atherosclerosis at the origin of the ICA.As there are no arteries emptying into or arising from the extracranial portion of the ICA (except in individuals with a persistent primitive hypoglossal artery (PPHA); see 7 Sect. 5.6.1.3.1 and . Fig. 5.31), an occlusion will extend to the level of the next branching in the petrous bone or intracranially into the ophthalmic artery. Embolic carotid occlusion mainly aects the distal, intracra­nial segments of the internal carotid system. In the most severe form, there will be to-and-fro ow in the Doppler waveform (thump pattern), and the thrombus may extend
the waveform from the postocclusive ECA segment becomes more like the ICA waveform (. Fig.5.30).
Recanalization following ICA occlusion is very rare, and,
if it occurs, it is generally associated with thromboembolic occlusion. It is characterized by ow signals in a tortuous and thin artery. Oen, hypoechoic areas are seen near the wall of the shrunken lumen throughout the extracranial ICA (. Fig.5.30). Spectral Doppler analysis will not reveal a ste­nosis jet but typically only slow ow and greater pulsatility compared with the normal ICA.
In the rare cases of CCA occlusion, the ICA may be relled by branches of the ECA recruited as collaterals (e.g., superior thyroid artery; see . Fig.5.63 (Atlas)). e corre-
5.6 · Ultrasound Criteria, Measurement Parameters, andDiagnostic Role
333
. Fig. 5.28 a Image of the carotid bifurcation showing occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) (absence of ow in the color ow image and
Doppler waveform). The Doppler waveform from the external carotid artery (ECA) shows a rather large diastolic ow component and pulsatility as in the ICA, indicating that the ECA supplies the brain. Tapping of the temporal artery with transmission of this eect into the waveform proves that the waveform is actually from the ECA. b The normal common carotid artery (CCA) has a mixed waveform (combining features of ICA and ECA blood ow). When the ICA is occluded, as in the example shown, pulsatility in the CCA becomes more like that in the ECA (left part of waveform) and ow velocity is reduced. The Doppler tracing was obtained by moving the transducer from the CCA to the ECA (while maintaining a constant Doppler angle). In this patient, the contribution of the ECA to collateral ow is small
5
ICAICA
ICA
ECAECA ECA
ab c
. Fig. 5.29a–c Diagrams of Doppler waveforms illustrating normal and abnormal ndings in the carotid territory. a Normal ow patterns–
internal carotid artery (ICA): low-resistance ow with little pulsatility and large diastolic ow component; external carotid artery (ECA): pulsatility higher than in the ICA (the ECA mainly supplies skin and muscles and therefore faces a higher peripheral resistance) but lower than in the extrem­ity arteries, due to the ECA’s supply to the glands; common carotid artery (CCA): mixed type, pulsatility intermediate between that of the ICA and ECA, which it supplies. b High-grade stenosis or occlusion of the ICA– ow in the CCA becomes increasingly pulsatile, approaching the ow pat­tern of the ECA (as the inuence of the ICA on the CCA waveform recedes or disappears). If the ECA additionally assumes collateral function and supplies the brain via the supratrochlear artery, the ECA waveform will become less pulsatile (low peripheral resistance). ICA waveform distal to high-grade ICA stenosis: characteristic postocclusive ow with delayed systolic upslope and decreased pulsatility, i.e., larger diastolic ow compo­nent and reduced peak systolic velocity (PSV). The dierence is less striking than the change from triphasic to monophasic ow in extremity arter­ies because the ICA is a low- resistance artery and already has a monophasic ow prole under normal conditions. c ICA occlusion– with the CCA exclusively supplying the ECA, its ow increases in pulsatility and the waveform becomes similar to that of the ECA.The ECA may partially supply the brain (e.g., via the supratrochlear artery), reected in a less pulsatile ow pattern with a larger diastolic component
sponding Doppler waveform will show retrograde ow in the proximal ECA with reversal to forward ow, but with a highly postocclusive character, in the ICA.
Bypass graing is indicated only in multi-vessel disease with reduced global cerebral perfusion, which may manifest as borderzone infarction.
5.6.1.3.1 Persistent Primitive Hypoglossal Artery
A persistent primitive hypoglossal artery (PPHA) is an embryonic communication between the anterior and poste­rior cerebral circulations, which normally resolves and oblit­erates during early embryonic development. PPHA is rare and is typically detected incidentally by angiography. e