Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5760_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
184
Chapter 3 · Extremity Veins
B-mode ultrasonography is the most suitable imaging modality both to identify the upper end of the thrombus for the initiation of adequate therapeutic management and to follow up therapy.
A retrospective analysis of the ultrasound ndings in
3
363 patients with thrombophlebitis demonstrated growth of the thrombus into the deep venous system over an observa­tion period of 10days in 11% of the cases. Seventy percent of these cases were accounted for by great saphenous vein thrombophlebitis with thrombus growth into the common femoral vein (Foley etal. 1989).
Other ultrasound studies of thrombophlebitis show thrombotic involvement of the deep venous system in 11–44% of patients, which is a much higher rate than sus­pected on the basis of the clinical appearance (Blättler 1993; Blättler etal. 1996; Gaitini 1990; Gaitini etal. 1988; Lutter et al. 1991; Jorgensen etal. 1993; Ascer et al. 1995). Since therapeutic management must encompass the deep veins in these patients, the indication for ultrasonography of the deep leg veins should be established generously.
In patients presenting with chronic venous insuciency, the question to be answered is whether the condition is due to great or small saphenous vein varicosis or whether it exists in the context of the postthrombotic syndrome. As the therapeutic consequences are dierent, adequate diagnostic workup always includes evaluation of the morphologic and functional status of the major deep veins. Primary valve incompetence of the supercial veins (varicosis) without involvement of the deep veins is treated by surgical removal of the aected supercial vein segments to prevent der­matologic damage as well as secondary involvement of the deep leg veins due to pressure and volume overload (so­called Trendelenburg private circulation; Hach and Hach­Wunderle 1994). In secondary valve incompetence of the supercial veins with simultaneous deep vein involvement (postthrombotic), on the other hand, excision of the varices will not provide much improvement with regard to venous return. With few exceptions, surgery is not indicated in this situation. Instead, patients, including those operated on, are treated by a rigorous compression regimen (which must also be continued aer surgery).
Incomplete recanalization or nearly complete post­thrombotic occlusion
the surgical removal of incompetent supercial vein segments. Tailoring therapeutic procedures to the individual patient relies on precise information regarding the localization and extent of morphologic and hemodynamic abnormalities. Duplex ultrasound is superior to all other imaging modali­ties in providing this information. To obtain all relevant diag­nostic information in patients with varicosis, the ultrasound examination should include the following components:
5 Evaluation of major supercial veins (great and small
saphenous veins), terminations, recirculation pathways
(truncal insuciency)
5 In patients with incomplete truncal varicosis:
5 Determination of the upper point of insuciency 5 Determination of the lower point of insuciency
of deep veins is a contraindication to
5 Identication of incompetent perforating veins 5 Demonstration of secondary major vein insuciency/
valve incompetence of major deep veins
5 Identication of variant terminations of supercial veins.
Morphologic variants
5 Detection of (residual) thrombus in the supercial and
deep venous systems
5 Quantication of poor venous return
If sclerotherapy is planned for the treatment of varicosis of a side branch or mild truncal varicosis, ultrasound can also serve to guide insertion of the thin cannula for injection of the sclerosing agent, particularly in obese patients, and to assess outcome.
3.1.6 Duplex Ultrasound: Diagnostic
Criteria, Indications, andRole
3.1.6.1 Thrombosis
e most important sonographic criterion of acute deep or supercial vein thrombosis is incompressibility of the vein when applying pressure with the transducer in transverse orientation (. Figs.3.17, 3.18, 3.19, and 3.21).
Additional sonographic ndings supporting the diagno-
sis of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are:
5 Widening of the lumen (other than breathing-related
diameter variation)
5 Abnormal intraluminal structure of low echogenicity
(but more echogenic than owing blood), may appear inhomogeneous
5 Absence of extravascular causes (perivascular structures)
of disturbed venous drainage
A fully compressed vein is no longer visible. Only a high­resolution transducer will depict the thin venous wall as an echogenic line within the muscle tissue. Incomplete com­pressibility indicates a thrombus surrounded by owing blood (adherent to wall, oating) or partial recanalization aer thrombosis with residual thrombus or severe wall scle­rosis preventing full compression (
e examination is usually performed with the patient lying on the examination table. Having the patient sit or stand may augment blood ow and improve evaluation of the calf veins. In the calf, the presence of a fresh thrombus improves visualization because the hypoechoic dilated vein is more conspicuous than a collapsed vein or a small, thin­walled vein with normal blood ow. A positive compression ultrasound result is nearly 100% specic for DVT of the leg. A negative result can rule out thrombosis in the thigh and in the popliteal fossa with acceptable accuracy. Some uncertainty remains in below-knee thrombosis, even with additional use of color Doppler imaging. If the ndings are equivocal and the clinical presentation is highly indicative of thrombosis (high pretest likelihood), additional diagnostic tests should be performed including venography, a -dimer test or repeat ultrasound aer 5days.
. Figs.3.18 and 3.19).
c
VV
3.1 · Pelvic andLeg Veins
a
185
TransducerTransducerTransducer
3
AA
V
b
. Fig. 3.17 a Normal compression ultrasound of the popliteal vein (transducer in popliteal fossa): the vein and artery have similar diameters,
and the walls are clearly delineated from surrounding fatty connective tissue (left gray-scale image). Applying pressure with the transducer (right gray-scale image) results in complete compression of the popliteal vein (<V.POP)– the lumen is no longer visible and the delicate walls are just barely distinct from the surrounding tissue. In the color ow image (right), ow in the popliteal artery is encoded in red (A). In the pop­liteal vein, the main ow direction is encoded in blue (V). There is also some ow in the opposite direction (coded in red) from venous branches joining the popliteal vein at these sites. b Diagram of compression ultrasound. A patent vein is completely compressible and virtually disap­pears when pressure is exerted with the transducer (second drawing). A thrombosed vein retains its shape upon compression (right drawing), while a partially thrombosed or partially recanalized vein can be compressed to some degree. A very fresh thrombus in a large vein may also be compressible to some extent, while the vein itself often has a wider lumen than the unaected vein or the accompanying artery. A more or less hyperechoic intraluminal structure may be visualized (see . Fig.3.25). c Acute thrombosis of the popliteal vein. The fresh thrombus mark­edly dilates the lumen of the vein (V.POP) (up to twice the size of the adjacent artery). The predominantly low echogenicity of the lumen clearly dierentiates the vein from surrounding fatty connective tissue. Application of pressure with the transducer (right gray-scale image) results in attening of the thrombus, while the vein itself retains its shape. The color ow image (right; low PRF to detect slow ow) shows no ow in the popliteal vein (V) except for some residual marginal ow (blue). This nding corresponds to the rubber phenomenon in venography (Modied from Schäberle 2014)
A
186
c d
Chapter 3 · Extremity Veins
Transducer Transducer
3
AA
V
a b
. Fig. 3.18 a Compression ultrasound ndings in partially thrombosed veins. When pressure is applied to a vein containing a mural thrombus sur-
rounded by owing blood (right drawing), only the patent portion of the lumen is compressible. The delineation of the thrombus within the lumen depends on its echogenicity, which in turn is determined by its composition. b B-mode imaging of the femoral vein without compression (left) and with compression (right). Incomplete compressibility of the vein (V.F.) is due to thrombus (T) in the center of the lumen. The thrombus is identied by its higher echogenicity compared with owing blood. c Gray- scale and color ow images showing oating thrombus (T) extending from the great saphenous vein (V.S.M) into the femoral vein (V.F.C). This thrombus prevents full compression of the vein. d Venogram conrming the thrombus
V
Incompressibility is a necessary and sucient criterion
for the diagnosis of DVT of the leg. Study results indicate that color duplex imaging does not improve diagnostic accuracy in DVT and tends to be less specic when used alone (i.e., without compression) because slow venous ow or poor imaging conditions below the knee may give rise to false positive ndings. Color duplex is required only to diag-
Transducer
Transducer
nose isolated pelvic thrombosis, which is rare. Evaluation of ow in the color duplex mode improves the diagnostic evaluation at the pelvic level, especially in obese patients, in whom compression maneuvers are dicult to perform. Moreover, color duplex imaging enables identication of residual blood ow around a thrombus or oating throm-
A
V
A
V
bus and also of recanalized veins, which oen have a small lumen (see . Fig.3.23).
Isolated pelvic vein thrombosis is thus the only case
in which compression ultrasound alone tends to be unreli­able due to the lack of an adequate structure against which to compress the vein and interfering overlying structures.
. Fig. 3.19 Compression ultrasound of a partially recanalized vein.
The extent to which the vein can be compressed depends on the degree of recanalization. Residual mural thrombi prevent full compres­sion (. Fig.3.23)
Instead, the diagnosis is based on absent or abnormal ow (compared to the unaected side) in the Doppler waveform or a gap in color lling in the color duplex mode.
3.1 · Pelvic andLeg Veins
187
3
. Fig. 3.20 Compression ultrasound ndings in dierent calf veins. a Isolated soleus vein thrombosis (<V>) with widening of the aected seg-
ment. The lumen is hypoechoic and incompressible (right image). The posterior tibial vein (V TIB P) and bular vein (V FIB) are patent (left image) and compressible (right image). Color duplex imaging can help the examiner in identifying the main calf veins by rst looking for the correspond­ing arteries, and the evaluation of ow can corroborate the diagnosis made by compression ultrasound. (The images shown are not magnied to illustrate what the examiner will see in the routine clinical situation.) b In this example, both branches of the paired bular vein (V) coursing to the left and right of the artery of the same name, are widely dilated and cannot be compressed (middle image, obtained while applying pressure with the transducer). The diameter is more than twice that of the artery (A), consistent with fresh thrombosis. The intraluminal thrombotic material has low echogenicity and appears homogeneous. The longitudinal color ow image (right) shows no ow in the vein (see . Fig.3.56 (Atlas)), and there is thrombosis at the site of a valve cusp (VK>). c Isolated thrombosis of one branch of the paired bular vein. The thrombosed branch does not collapse (V FIB) when pressure is exerted with the transducer (KOMP, center image), and there is no spontaneous ow in this branch in the color duplex image (left). The shrunken lumen and poor demarcation from surrounding muscle tissue (right image) are signs of older thrombosis. The posterior tibial vein (KOMP, middle image) is compressible, and there is good color lling upon slight manual compression of the calf distal to the transducer (right part of leftmost image) (see . Fig.3.51 (Atlas))
Careful scrutiny of the pelvic axis is indicated if an abnor-
mal Doppler waveform
with reduced respiratory phasicity
and slower ow compared to the contralateral side is obtained
in the distal external iliac vein. e patient must lie supine
with the thigh slightly abducted and externally rotated to ensure undisturbed venous outow under the inguinal liga­ment. Flat positioning with the thigh stretched will compress the vein as it courses under the inguinal ligament, reducing or even eliminating respiratory phasicity in the Doppler wave­form obtained from this site. However, since even isolated pelvic vein thrombosis typically involves the entire external iliac vein (including drainage through veins of the sapheno­femoral junction and abdominal wall), the thrombosis can be demonstrated by B-mode and compression ultrasound above the inguinal ligament. is method of indirect hemodynamic ow analysis in the groin will only miss non- ow- obstructing thrombus (i.e., thrombus extending from the external iliac into the common iliac vein or thrombosis caused by mural thrombi in a partially patent pelvic vein).
e small-caliber vessels below the knee are less well
demarcated from the inhomogeneous echotexture of
surrounding muscle tissue. Still, the criteria for isolated vein
thrombosis
in this territory are the same as in the thigh.
Better lling of the veins is achieved if the examination is performed in the sitting or standing patient. Since a tubu­lar structure distended by acute thrombosis can be identi­ed more easily than a normal vein, nonvisualization can be interpreted to indicate absence of acute thrombosis. Note, however, that this only holds true for acute venous throm­bosis, whereas older thrombi shrink and oen become more hyperechoic and inhomogeneous with the venous lumen returning to its normal diameter. Hence, the vein is again more dicult to dierentiate from surrounding muscle tis­sue (. Figs.3.20, 3.50 (Atlas), 3.51 (Atlas), and 3.52 (Atlas)), rendering the method less accurate in identifying older thrombosis below the knee.
Many studies with dierent study designs conducted in the 1980s and 1990s yielded sensitivities of 88–100% and specicities of >95% for compression ultrasound compared with the then gold standard, venography (. Table 3.2). A meta-analysis (with subgroup analysis by site of thrombo­sis) found >95% sensitivity for the femoropopliteal segment
188
Chapter 3 · Extremity Veins
. Table 3.2 Studies investigating the diagnostic performance of compression ultrasound, duplex ultrasound, and color duplex
ultrasound in larger patient populations with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the leg (with venography as the gold standard)
Author/Year Patients [n] Thrombosis [n] Sensitivity [%] Specicity [%]
Compression ultrasound
3
Appelman etal. (1987) 112 52 96 97
Dauzat etal. (1986)
Elias etal. (1987)
a
a
Habscheid etal. (1990)
b
145 100 94 100
430 303 98 95
238 153 96 99
Hobson (1990) 209 99 100
Krings etal. (1990) 182 95 97
Lensing etal. (1989)
b
220 66 99 100
Pederson (1991) 215 113 89 97
Herzog etal. (1991)
b
113 57 88 98
Langholz (1991) 64 25 76 88
Compression ultrasound: analysis of below-knee veins only (thrombosis)
b
Habscheid (1990) 37 89 99
Elias etal. (1987) 92 91 96
Duplex ultrasound
De Valois etal. (1990) 180 61 92 90
Comerota etal. (1990) 103 44 96 93
Killewich etal. (1989)
b
47 38 92 92
Van Ramshorst etal. (1991) 117 64 91 95
Schäberle (1991)
b,c
125 56 97 98
Betzl (1990) 66 97 72
Color duplex ultrasound
Schindler etal. (1990) 97 54 98 100
Grosser etal. (1990)
b
180 154 94 99
Van Ramshorst etal. (1991) 117 64 91 95
Schönhofer (1992) 100 63 97 98
Miller etal. (1996) 216 98 99 100
Fürst etal. (1990) 102 39 95 99
Persson etal. (1989)
Rose etal. (1990)
b
b
264 16 100 100
69 32 79 88
Van Gemmeren etal. (1991) 114 74 96 97
Langholz (1991) 116 65 100 94
Fobbe etal. (1989) 103 58 96 97
Lensing etal. (1989) 220 91 99
Krings etal. (1990) 235 93 96
Schweizer etal. (1993)
78 70 96 100
(with ultrasound contrast agent)
Note that below-knee veins were not included in the examination in all cases
a
Compression ultrasound, in part, supplemented by CW Doppler
b
Below-knee veins included in examination and analysis
c
Compression ultrasound as rst-line diagnostic test with optional supplementary duplex ultrasound (primarily to assess pelvic veins and
resolve inconclusive ndings below the knee)
3.1 · Pelvic andLeg Veins
189
3
and 85–90% sensitivity for veins below the knee (Elias etal. 1987; Lensing etal. 1989; Krings etal. 1990; Atri etal. 1996; Habscheid 1990 and 1998; Schäberle 2010). Of note are the studies of Habscheid and Elias et al. because they deter­mined sensitivity and specicity separately for veins below and above the knee. Habscheid (1990) found 88% sensitivity below the knee versus 96% above the knee with 99% specic­ity for both territories. Elias etal. (1987) found 91% versus 98% sensitivity. ese studies have also revealed that venog­raphy is a poor gold standard, especially below the knee, where nonvisualization of a vein such as the bular vein is inconclusive, suggesting either thrombosis or a technical limitation of the method (nonopacication) (. Figs.3.55 and
3.56 (both Atlas)).
In addition to the major veins below the knee (which can be identied using the arteries of the same name as land­marks), the muscle veins of the gastrocnemius and soleus
groups
deserve special attention. ey are a common source of DVT, especially in immobilized patients. Stasis of blood ow is common when the muscle veins become ectatic with age. e diagnostic criteria are the same as for thrombosis of the main veins (dilated, incompressible vein, identied as a tubular structure in its typical location in the muscle). rombosis of muscle veins below the knee and of the deep femoral vein is rarely detected by venography.
e diagnostic limitations of venography (see
3.1.9
) in the evaluation not only of below-knee veins, such as the bular vein and muscle veins, but also of supercial leg veins led some investigators to abandon venography as the gold standard. Instead, they determined the occurrence of thromboembolic complications in untreated patients (typi­cally at 3-month follow-up) as a measure of the diagnostic
performance of ultrasound
ultrasound in terms of missed thrombosis rather than in comparison to venographic ndings. A meta-analysis of 7 studies found a pooled venous thromboembolism event rate of 0.57% (0.25–0.89%) in a total of 4731 patients who did not receive anticoagulation aer negative whole-leg compression ultrasound (Johnson etal. 2010). ese studies also revealed a dierence between outpatients and inpatients (higher prev­alence).
In most patients, femoropopliteal thrombosis is due to ascending thrombosis arising in a main vein below the knee or a muscle vein. Surprisingly, a review of therapeutic studies including a total of more than 3500 patients with suspected thrombosis in whom only the territory from the distal external iliac vein (inguinal ligament) to the distal popliteal vein was continuously evaluated using compres­sion ultrasound identied a 3-month thromboembolism rate of only 0.4–2.6% in untreated patients. While this protocol will miss instances of isolated below-knee thrombosis, this has no diagnostic or therapeutic relevance because the clini­cal course tends to be uncomplicated as long as there is no ascending growth. Nevertheless, various diagnostic algo­rithms ( thromboembolic complications from ascending growth of missed below-knee thrombosis (Bernardi etal. 1998; Cogo
. Fig.3.21) were proposed to minimize the risk of
. In other words, they assessed
7 Sect.
etal. 1998; Perrier etal. 1999; Wells etal. 1997) ( Specically, investigators used the following measures to
supplement diagnostic workup in patients with negative ultrasound ndings but clinically suspected thrombosis
5 Repeat compression ultrasound aer 1week (Cogo etal.
1998)
5 D-dimer test for risk stratication before repeat ultra-
sound (Bernardi etal. 1998)
5 Supplementary venography in patients with a relevant
risk but negative compression ultrasound (Perrier etal.
1999)
5 Repeat compression ultrasound in patients with initially
negative compression ultrasound; venography only in patients with a high likelihood of thrombosis based on a set of clinical criteria (Wells etal. 1997).
All of these algorithms were proposed to remedy the diag­nostic uncertainty of compression ultrasound in the calf (85–90% sensitivity) by supplementary measures. e most common strategies include the highly sensitive but rather unspecic -dimer test, repeat ultrasound aer 1week, and venography in high-risk patients ( empirical and clinical experience, patients with suspected venous thrombosis can be assigned to a high-probability or a low-probability group on the basis of their risk factors, the severity of clinical signs, and the likelihood of alterna­tive conditions that may explain their symptoms. is risk stratication guides further diagnostic management if the ultrasound ndings are inconclusive. For instance, high­risk patients will undergo supplementary venography or a -dimer test, while no further diagnostic measures will be taken in patients with a low risk (. Fig.3.21).
Some of the diagnostic algorithms proposed in the lit­erature are rather complex. In the hands of an experienced examiner, compression ultrasound yields clinically accept­able results despite its limitations below the knee. In a study of 1265 patients in whom treatment decisions were made on the basis of a complete compression ultrasound examination of the leg veins, 0.3% of patients with negative ndings expe­rienced a thromboembolic event during 3-month follow-up (Schellong etal. 2003). is low risk of DVT in patients with negative ultrasound examinations including the calf veins was conrmed in another study, which reported thrombo­embolic complications in 0.5% of cases (Elias etal. 2003) (see
7 Sect. 3.1.9.1 and . Fig.3.38).
e diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound including the
veins below the knee
studies conducted more recently (Stevens et al. 2004; Subramaniam etal. 2005; Sevestre etal. 2009; Stevens etal.
2013). e residual failure rate is less than 1%, which is at the upper limit of the 95% condence interval. Note, however, that cohort studies oen include many patients with a low pretest likelihood of disease. e only study that selectively investigated patients with a high pretest probability (n=167) (Stevens etal. 2013) found a low thromboembolism rate of
0.6% at 3months in patients with prior negative ultrasound above and below the knee (see 7 Sect. 3.1.9.1).
is also conrmed by large cohort
. Table 3.3). Based on
. Table3.3).
:
190
sN
--
--
Chapter 3 · Extremity Veins
Suspected thrombosis
Compression ultrasound
3
Suspected thrombosis
Compression ultrasound
D-dimer test
1
Repeat compression ultrasound
+
+
Thrombosis
Suspected thrombosis
D-dimer test
Compression ultrasound
after 1 week
No thrombosis
Cogo BMJ 1996:316:17
+
+
ultrasound after 1 week
+
2
Thrombosis
+
Repeat compression
No thrombosis
E Bernardi BMJ 1998:317:1037
Suspected thrombosis
Compression ultrasound
Clinical risk assessment
High
Moderate
Low
4
+
Venography
+
Repeat compression
ultrasound after 1 week
+
o thrombosis
Variant of P Wells Lancet 1997:350:1795
High risk
Low/Moderate risk
Venography
+
3
Thrombosis Thrombosis
No thrombosi
Perrier A Lancet 1999:353:190
Suspected thrombosis
Clinical criteria for predicting pretest probability of thrombosis (according to Wells 1997)
Compression ultrasound
Clinical risk assessment
High
+
Moderate
D-dimer test
Low
+
Ultrasound follow-up after 1 week
(or immediate venography)
+
a
. Fig. 3.21 a Algorithms for the diagnostic management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the legs. The clinical risk of DVT is assessed by means
of a scale with a score greater than 2 indicating a high risk of thrombosis and a score of 1 or 2 a moderate risk. Charts 1–4: Algorithms used in pro­spective studies with compression ultrasound restricted to veins above the knee including the popliteal vein. Chart 5: Diagnostic algorithm with compression ultrasound of the veins above and below the knee and procedure in patients with inconclusive ndings below the knee (according to W.Habscheid). No further diagnostic tests are required in patients with a moderate risk and negative ultrasonography of the calf performed by an experienced examiner (see . Fig.3.38). b Algorithm for the diagnostic management of DVT using whole-leg compression ultrasound as the only diagnostic test; 3-month thrombosis rate of 0.3% in the group with negative ultrasound ndings (Schellong etal. 2003)
5
Thrombosis
No thrombosis
Clinical feature
Active cancer Leg immobilization (cast, paralysis) Bedridden > 3 days, postoperative Leg swelling (unilateral) Calf swelling > 3 cm Pain (tenderness) along distribution of veins Dilated superficial collateral veins Clinical findings or history of other disease that explains symptoms or is more likely than thrombosis
Score
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
–2
b
3.1 · Pelvic andLeg Veins
191
3
Suspected thrombosis
Compression ultrasound including lower leg veins
Thrombosis
Treatment
. Fig. 3.21 (continued)
No thrombosis
No further diagnostic testing
e largest database was analyzed in the above-quoted study of Johnson etal. (2010). is meta-analysis of the diag­nostic accuracy of a single compression ultrasound exami­nation for ruling out DVT included 7 studies totaling 4731 patients with negative whole-leg compression ultrasound who did not receive anticoagulation. e rate of clinically apparent venous thromboembolism in this population was only 0.57% during 3-month follow-up.
Data on the outcome of thrombosis indicate that patients with completely recanalized veins have a lower risk of recur­rence than patients whose veins recanalize only incompletely
(1.3% versus 23.3%). In a group of 180 patients with residual thrombosis aer 3months of anticoagulation (69% of the total study population), recurrent thrombosis occurred in 19.3% of patients who continued anticoagulation treatment and in
27.2% of patients who discontinued treatment (Siragusa etal.
2008). In the group of 78 patients (31%) without sonographic evidence of relevant postthrombotic residues (complete recanalization), there was only one case of recurrent throm­bosis. ese results indicate that follow-up ultrasound nd­ings at 3 and 6months are helpful in identifying patients who might benet from prolonged anticoagulant treatment.
Another study using serial ultrasound follow-up found a cumulative incidence of postthrombotic states without major postthrombotic residues in 38.8% of cases at 6months,
58.1% of cases at 12months, 69.3% at 24months, and 73.8% at 36months (Prandoni etal. 2002 and 2009). In this popula­tion of initially 313 patients, 41 of the 58 patients with recur­rent thrombosis had major postthrombotic residues (hazard ratio of 2.4, 95% condence interval: 1.3–4.4; p = 0.004; patients with residual thrombosis versus patients with early recanalization).
ese ndings suggest that, in patients with sonographic evidence of
major residual thrombosis, the risk of recurrent
thrombosis can be reduced by prolonging anticoagulation treatment.
Recanalization aer an episode of DVT is subject to indi­vidual variation, which is why a postthrombotic vein may no longer be compressible and compression ultrasound is less
. Table 3.3 Prospective therapeutic studies of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the legs and diagnostic
workup based on compression ultrasound of the proximal leg veins including the popliteal vein using the algorithms presented in
. Fig.3.21a (According to Bounameaux 2002)
Study Cogo 1998 Bernardi 1998 Wells 1997 Perrier 1999
Diagnostic tests rCUS rCUS + DD rCUS + PP CUS+DD+PP
Diagnostic algorithm (see .
Number of patients 1702 946 593 474
Prevalence of thrombosis 24% 28% 16% 24%
PP Score Empirical
DD Yes Yes
CUS 100% 100% 100% 73%
rCUS 76% 9% 28% 0%
Abnormal rCUS 0.9% 5.7% 1.8%
Venography 0% 0% 6% 0.4%
3-month risk of thromboembolism in untreated group
CUS compression ultrasound, rCUS repeat compression ultrasound, DD
Fig.3.21a)
1 2 4 3
0.7% 0.4% 0.6% 2.6%
d-dimer test, PP estimation of pretest probability
192
Chapter 3 · Extremity Veins
specic in diagnosing recurrent thrombosis (false positive results). ere are several sonographic ndings that suggest recurrent thrombosis. One is the presence of a markedly dilated, incompressible vein segment (. Fig.3.26c) proximal to a partially recanalized venous segment (with demonstra-
3
tion of ow by color duplex). Another sonographic criterion indicating recurrence is a central ow void that represents a thrombus surrounded by owing blood (comparable to the rubber phenomenon in venography). In contrast, restored ow in a formerly thrombosed segment tends to occur centrally and take a meandering course (. Fig.3.23). Incompressibility of a previously normal vein segment is nearly 100% diagnostic of recurrent thrombosis but requires meticulous documentation of serial ultrasound ndings for comparison (Prandoni et al. 1993). It is therefore recom­mended to perform a comprehensive color duplex ultra­sound evaluation at the end of anticoagulation treatment (usually 6months aer the onset of thrombosis) to establish a new baseline for future examinations, typically when recur­rence is suspected on clinical grounds.
Patients with complete recanalization following an epi­sode of acute vein thrombosis and at least partially compe­tent valves (based on duplex testing of reux) can be allowed to discontinue elastic compression stocking therapy (Ten Cate-Hoek etal. 2010).
3.1.6.1.1 Controversy About theUltrasound
Strategy inSuspected Deep Vein Thrombosis
Abbreviated examination protocols not including the veins below the knee in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with clinically suspected lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are mainly used in North America. e rationale for only examining the venous territory from the inguinal liga­ment to the tibiobular junction is that the risk of pulmonary embolism from thrombosed veins below this level is very low (<3%) and that postthrombotic changes in the calf veins have little clinical relevance. If the calf veins are not included, then one can just as well restrict compression ultrasound evalua­tion to two representative sites ( a relevant loss of information. e two sites are:
5 the femoral bifurcation (i.e., the segment from the ingui-
nal ligament to the conuence of the supercial and
deep femoral veins) and
5 the popliteal vein (i.e., from the adductor canal to the
tibiobular junction) (. Fig.3.22).
e justication for the two-point strategy is that isolated femoral vein thrombosis is extremely rare (Frederick etal. 1996; Pezzullo etal. 1996). e junction of the external iliac and common femoral vein is virtually always involved in descending thrombosis, while the popliteal vein is involved in ascending thrombosis arising in a calf vein. Isolated supercial femoral vein thrombosis is virtually conned to individuals with duplication of this vein (see . Fig.3.58 (Atlas)). In duplication, one branch may be thrombosed and the other patent (Cogo etal. 1998). e other exception is
two-point strategy) without
thrombophlebitis with thrombus growth into the femoral vein through a Dodd perforator.
Proponents claim that not including the supercial femo­ral vein in the sonographic workup of suspected lower extrem­ity thrombosis reduces the examination time by 30–50%. Two large prospective randomized studies (each including approx. 1000 patients) conrm that the rate of thromboembolism is not much higher in patients examined using the
strategy
undergoing whole-leg ultrasound (Bernardi et al. 2008; Gibson etal. 2009). In the study of Bernardi etal., the throm­botic complication rate was 1.2% in the whole-leg ultrasound group versus 0.9% in the two-point ultrasound group. In the latter group, ultrasound was repeated aer 1week if the initial examination was negative but the D-dimer test was positive.
(2009), 1002 consecutive patients with suspected DVT underwent clinical probability assessment and a D-dimer test. In this way, 481 (48%) of patients with low clinical prob­ability and normal D-dimer ndings were excluded (0.4% thromboembolic complication rate), and the remaining patients were randomized to a complete compression ultra­sound examination or a rapid protocol, which examines the veins in the groin and the knee. DVT was conrmed in 23% of the 257 patients who underwent two-point ultrasound and in 38% of the 264 patients who underwent a complete exami­nation. e incidence of venous thromboembolism during follow-up was 2% in the former and 1.2% in the latter.
remains a problem for the two-point protocol, the risk of thromboembolic complications arising from missed calf vein thrombosis appears to be much lower than expected. In the above-quoted study of Gibson etal. (2009), the rate of missed thromboses was 65%; however, only a small number of additional thromboembolic complications were observed (4 versus 2 patients or 2% versus 1.2%) compared with patients examined by whole-leg compression ultra­sound including the calf veins. A higher rate of venous thromboembolism in patients with untreated isolated calf thrombosis was found in the CALTHRO study (Palareti etal. 2010). In this study, ultrasound was positive in 15.3% of 431 patients examined for isolated calf vein thrombo­sis. While untreated calf vein thrombosis progressed to the proximal main vein (popliteal vein) in only 3.1% of cases, the 3-month thromboembolic complication rate was sig­nicantly higher in the group with calf vein thrombosis than in the group without calf vein thrombosis (7.8% ver­sus 0.8%, p=0.003). However, not counting two patients in whom repeat ultrasound aer 1week detected ascending thrombus growth, the dierence became barely signicant (4.7% versus 0.8%, p=0.049).
found good safety proles for complete proximal and distal ultrasound examinations versus examinations limited to the proximal veins with similar pooled estimates of the 3-month thromboembolic rate (0.6% versus 0.4%). However, they also found that calf vein thrombosis accounted for 50%
(. Fig.3.22) plus D-dimer test compared to patients
In the prospective management study of Gibson etal.
While detection of isolated calf vein thrombosis
e authors of a meta-analysis (Righini et al. 2005)
two-point
ab c
3.1 · Pelvic andLeg Veins
193
3
. Fig. 3.22a–c Diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the legs using compression ultrasound. There is
no agreement about the venous segments that should be included in the examination. a Compression ultrasound from the inguinal ligament to the distal popliteal vein using a standardized algorithm (see . Fig.3.21); this approach is based on the assumption that calf vein thrombosis rarely causes thromboembolic complications. b Reduced examination of the femoral vein (from the inguinal ligament to just below the site of entry of the deep femoral vein) and of the popliteal vein (two-point strategy). This approach assumes that isolated thrombosis of the supercial femoral vein is rare, which is why this vein is not included in the examination. c Compression ultrasound from the inguinal ligament to the distal portion of the calf veins (whole-leg strategy). The anterior tibial vein need not be included in the basic examination (except in patients with trauma of the anterior compartment) as no cases of isolated anterior tibial thrombosis have yet been reported
of patients with positive ndings in the series undergoing whole-leg ultrasound, concluding that searching for distal deep vein thrombosis potentially doubles the number of patients given anticoagulant therapy and may result in over­treatment.
e controversy about the
evance of isolated calf vein thrombosis
clinical and therapeutic rel-
and its diagnosis is not over. e risk of thromboembolic complications and late valve failure is considered to be low (Moser and LeMoine
1981). Moreover, experience also suggests that many patients with calf vein thrombosis will never develop symptoms. ere is only one study showing a signicantly increased rate of thromboembolic complications in patients not treated by long­term anticoagulation for calf vein thrombosis (Lagerstedt etal.
1985), and this was in a rather small patient population. Other authors have shown that isolated calf thrombosis will progress proximally into the popliteal vein and farther in about 20% of untreated patients (Kakkar etal. 1969; Langerstedt 1985; Cornus etal. 1999; Gottlieb etal. 2003).
Even less scientic evidence is available on the signi-
cance of muscle vein thrombosis
. In the clinical setting,
though, we keep encountering patients with popliteal vein thrombosis that has arisen from isolated soleus vein throm­bosis. is is especially common in the elderly, in whom these veins are dilated. e soleus veins drain into the pos­terior tibial and bular veins, and thrombus growth into the major deep veins of the calf was observed in 16% of cases. Gastrocnemius veins drain into the popliteal vein, and here, growth into the popliteal vein was observed in only 3% of cases over a period of 2weeks. is can be interpreted to jus­tify short anticoagulation treatment. Because dilated throm­bosed veins are tender, the patient can direct the examiner to the disease focus during the compression ultrasound examination. Dilated calf veins are more conspicuous sono­graphically, making them easier to identify than normal or collapsed veins (. Figs.3.17 and 3.19).
In conclusion, although isolated calf vein thrombo-
sis as such rarely causes thromboembolic complication timely anticoagulation treatment is indicated to prevent proximal progression
. In the German-speaking countries, the general strategy is to include the calf veins in the com­pression ultrasound examination of patients with suspected
,