Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
UBS EM Outlook 2019_watermark.pdf
Скачиваний:
3
Добавлен:
06.09.2019
Размер:
1.56 Mб
Скачать

vk.com/id446425943

Credit: Help from more realistic risk premia

Global Macro Strategy 19 November 2018

82

vk.com/id446425943

Briefing

EM credits closed 2018 with better risk premia on country-specific issues and weaker- than-expected growth; we see no large step correction in 2019.

EM sovereign health and MBS scores do not suggest we are close to a crisis. South Africa, Turkey, Mexico and sub-Saharan Africa seem at risk, while Indonesia, Russia and Brazil should fare better. We expect a modest spread widening of 20-30bp.

CNY volatility, redemption and rising onshore defaults (spill-over effect to offshore spread) put more pressure on EM corporates, which should see spreads widen 30-50bp.

EM Asian HY valuations are wide relative to US HY. Chinese HY properties’ cheapened valuations offer a more balanced risk profile.

At 96bp, the YTD widening in EM sovereign credit spreads is the highest since 2013. To a degree, this cheapening of the asset class has been optical: weakness in just four countries, Venezuela, Argentina, Turkey and Lebanon, has explained 35% of the YTD widening in EMBI GD (Figure 169). Nonetheless, together with weaker-than-expected growth, the widening in EM spreads has been more pronounced than we expected, especially in the context of spreads remaining tight in Europe and the US. Despite the recent widening of US HY, the gap between EMBI GD and a similarly rated US spreads aggregate is now at the 96th percentile of its post-crisis distribution (Figure 170).

EM spreads moved wider at a speed similar to 2013, but from a higher level

Figure 169: EM spread percentile by country

Figure 170: EMBI GD spread vs similarly rated US spread

100%

 

 

 

5y percentile of top-20 countries by weight

 

 

550

 

Spread between EM and US (rhs)

 

90%

 

 

 

 

 

 

EMBI GD spread

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US spread (rating matched to EM)

 

80%

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

96%ile

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60%

 

 

 

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30%

 

 

 

 

 

 

350

 

 

 

 

 

 

74%ile

20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

 

 

 

23%ile

Mexico

Turkey

China

SouthAfrica Argentina Ecuador Chile Colombia Philippines Russia Peru Malaysia Indonesia

Brazil

Panama

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lebanon

200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

200

150

100

50

0

-50

-100

-150

Source: Datastream, UBS

Source: Datastream, Bloomberg, UBS. Note: US spreads are aggregate based on

 

50% IG and 50 & HY

No large step adjustment due in EM credit

It is very likely that in 2018 there has already been a repricing of risk premium in the weakest EM credits such as Argentina and Turkey. Politics, as always, can still bring new challenges, but based on current redemption schedules (Figure 173), it is difficult to see the catalyst for another step adjustment. For a deeper view on whether it is time to buy Argentina, see Box 14.

Most countries in EM do not have a balance sheet problem; those that do, have seen their prices adjust

Global Macro Strategy 19 November 2018

83

vk.com/id446425943

Box 14: Is it time to buy after the rough ride in Argentina?

Tighter financial conditions globally, rising risk aversion towards EM, and domestic policy mistakes led to a drying out of financing, sending the peso into free-fall and pushing inflation higher for Argentina in 2018. By May, authorities had no choice but to seek IMF help. Argentina has since negotiated two iterations of a three-year stand-by agreement, recently augmented to USD57bn, 90% of which is scheduled to be disbursed within the next 12 months.

The agreement with the IMF has two key pillars. First, it puts an end to fiscal gradualism, demanding that this year's expected 2.6% of GDP primary deficit be turned into a 1% of GDP surplus by 2020. To achieve this, the authorities will cut public investment, reduce utility subsidies, maintain some distortionary taxes, and tax exporting sectors more heavily (Figure 171). The second pillar is a monetary straight-jacket: zero monetary growth in nominal terms through July 2019. Given that inflation is expected to end 2018 at 47%, and that the central bank is reducing its stock of Lebac liabilities (not all of which are being turned into Leliqs held by the banks), this constitutes a monumental monetary contraction in real terms, one that will keep interest rates high (currently at 68% on seven-day Leliqs) and that will be relaxed only if the peso appreciates and tests the bottom of wide, pre-established, FX bands.

We think the Macri administration will hit the interim target of a 0% of GDP primary balance in 2019, but the commitment of the incoming government in 2020 (President Macri will face re-election in October) is more questionable, particularly given that it will have little in the way of IMF disbursements to look forward to at that point. Using these assumptions, the government projects that it will not need to issue USD debt aside from the short-term maturity LETES until 2020, for which it assumes a 50% roll-over for USD-denominated and 100% for ARS-denominated.

Our analysis (Figure 172) shows that meeting the fiscal target in 2019 (0 deficit) combined with close to a 60% roll-over for short-term private debt in USD and local currency would be enough to cover the financing needs of the government until the end of the Macri administration. However, the market will follow closely whether the government is complying with the fiscal target in an election year, and the sustainability of the monetary and exchange rate plan in an environment of higher financing costs, to assess short-term debt sustainability. Medium-term credit spreads will be subject to the market's perception of the outcome of the 2019 election, and the adherence of whoever wins to the current adjustment plan and the SBA with the IMF. The expected recession in 2018-19 could weigh on the current administration's ability to retain power. We expect to see an increase in uncertainty in this regard as the political campaign heats up by the second quarter of the year.

In short, the front-loading from the IMF serves the purpose of a co-ordination mechanism that induces private investors to roll over a higher proportion of their short-term Argentinean credit exposure and decreasing liquidity risks, but political factors will heavily influence whether the country faces another high-stress episode in the next couple of years.

Figure 171: Primary deficit proposed adjustment from 2018 to 2019 (% of GDP)

 

3.5

0.3

 

 

Operatingcosts

currentOther expenditure

revenueAdditional

 

3.0

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

rightsExportsrevenue

 

assistanceSocial

spendingCapital

subsidyEconomic

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

-0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

-0.5

 

 

 

Deficit

1.0

 

 

 

 

-0.2

 

 

 

 

 

-0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-0.2

2019

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

0.0 -1.1

Source: Bloomberg, UBS

Figure 172: Debt sustainability requires meeting fiscal targets and high rollover rates for short-term debt (USD bn)

Source: Ministerio de Hacienda, UBS estimates

Armando Armenta and Rafael De La Fuente

Global Macro Strategy 19 November 2018

84

vk.com/id446425943

Figure 173: Hard currency securities and loans due to mature next three years (USD bn)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

Debt to gross

Country of risk

Financials

Energy

Materials

Industrials

Utilities

Government

Others

Total

Reserves

reserves

Total

422

146

103

63

46

281

149

1210

5833

 

China

233

29

28

31

14

25

54

413

3177

13%

Russia

18

32

22

4

0

9

3

88

459

19%

South Korea

11

1

5

8

6

42

8

82

403

20%

Turkey

38

4

1

2

2

21

12

79

85

93%

Argentina

3

4

0

1

1

67

2

78

54

144%

India

30

15

9

3

2

4

14

77

401

19%

Brazil

18

11

11

3

4

8

15

70

380

18%

Mexico

5

20

5

3

3

12

16

64

174

37%

Indonesia

10

10

7

2

4

20

6

58

115

50%

Poland

10

1

2

0

1

26

1

41

113

37%

South Africa

10

0

5

1

3

6

7

32

50

63%

Malaysia

7

8

0

3

0

3

4

26

103

25%

Chile

6

2

6

0

2

1

2

20

37

53%

Kazakhstan

12

4

1

0

0

0

0

17

30

56%

Hungary

0

1

0

0

0

14

0

16

28

57%

Philippines

6

0

0

0

1

6

2

15

75

20%

Egypt

1

1

0

0

1

11

0

14

45

31%

Colombia

2

2

1

0

2

4

2

13

48

28%

Peru

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

8

58

13%

Source: Bloomberg, UBS. Red boxes indicate top-16 country-sectors with highest maturity as a percentage of country reserves

A modest widening amid weak growth is the base case

Nonetheless, there will be no escape in the context of weaker EM growth, which always brings pressure on fiscal positions, which have already been slowly deteriorating (Figure 174), limiting capital inflows. External metrics are likely to deteriorate incrementally, and more quickly, if EM economies begin to lose FX reserves at a time of tighter policy from the Fed and ECB.

Figure 174: EM public debt and DM public debt (% of

Figure 175: UBS EM Macro Balance Sheet Risk Score

GDP)

 

110

% of GDP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

Score; 0=lowest risk / 20=highest risk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DM

 

EM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

Peak 11.74 as of Apr-99

Leverage

External

Fiscal

Institutional risk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trough 8.61 as of Jan-07

Today: 10.22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

90

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

00

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

2017

Source: IMF, UBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source:

Haver, UBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our Macro Balance Sheet Risk Score (Figure 175) forms the core of our EM credit valuation framework. It comprises a weighted average score of four indices: a) leverage risk (25%), b) external risk (40%), c) fiscal risk (20% weight), and d) institutional risk (15%). We think of the first three indices as a proxy of ability to pay, and of institutional risk as a proxy of willingness to pay. (For more details see

EM Navigator: Quantifying Macro Risk - Healing or Drifting?) Under current weak conditions, we expect our MBS score to drift higher by 0.2–0.4 points towards a level of 10.5–10.6, still well away from crisis level readings of 12. If growth does not improve from 2019, crisis level readings could emerge in three to four years.

We quantify macro risk in EM credit based on our Macro Balance Sheet Risk Score, which suggests a worsening credit profile for EM, but not a crisis

Global Macro Strategy 19 November 2018

85

vk.com/id446425943

However, this assumes linear relationships, and things can move quicker in the real world.

Figure 176: EMBI GD fair value framework*

 

 

EM Growth (EMBI-weighted, %y/y)

 

 

 

1.7%

2.7%

3.7%

 

 

 

(Current)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20% down

393

371

349

 

Commodity

Current

376

353

331

 

price moves

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20% up

361

339

317

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Haver, Bloomberg, UBS *Keeping global risk premium index at 0. Based on two regression models 1) EMBI spreads regressed on MBS, log of commodity price index (75% oil and 25% BCOMIN) and global risk premium for period since Jan 2003; and 2) MBS change (y/y) regressed on EM growth (EMBI-weighted).

Taking a neutral view of global risk appetite, and commodity prices, this worsening in Macro Balance Risk Score is consistent with spreads widening modestly by 20– 30bp next year (Figure 176) compared with 96bp YTD. Along with a slight drift wider in US rates, this still makes for a total return of about 4.1% in EM hardcurrency sovereign debt. In total return terms, this is less than what we are expecting in local-currency debt. However, based on our belief that a weaker USD and GBI EM stability is likely to be back-loaded in 2019, we go into 2019 with a modest preference for hardover local-currency debt.

Our MBS risk score points to a further widening of 20–30bp in EMBI GD spreads in 2019; total returns should be close to 4%

Figure 177: YTD change in EMBI GD spreads by rating buckets

Figure 178: EMBI GD spreads relative to US corporate spreads

350

 

 

 

180

EMBI GD Spreads relative to US

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

160

 

159.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

Composite:117.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

64.7

 

 

66.1

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.9

(B)EM AR LE EL NI EG IR (BB)EM TR ZA DR SE CR BZ (BBB)EM RO IN MX ID RU HU UR PN PE PH CO KZ (A)EM CN MY CL PD LI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

 

 

 

 

0

 

B

 

BB

 

 

BBB

 

A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B(+/-)

BB(+/-)

BBB (+/-)

A(+/-)

 

 

 

 

Weight in EMBI GD(%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Datastream, UBS

 

 

 

Source: Datastream, Bloomberg, UBS

 

 

 

 

 

In 2018, the B rating segment widened the most in both absolute (Figure 177) and relative (to US corporates) terms (Figure 178). In 2019, we expect a slight widening here, but also a drift wider in the BB and BBB credits. By country, we think South Africa, Turkey, Mexico and sub-Saharan Africa are most at risk, especially if commodity prices are weaker than we currently anticipate. Amid weaker China growth, we expect a widening in hitherto stable Asian credits too. Indonesia, Russia and Brazil should perform better, relatively speaking (Figure 179).

Global Macro Strategy 19 November 2018

86