- •Will 2019 be another difficult year for EM?
- •When will EM equities begin a decent rally; what support is required?
- •Is there a case for local-currency debt over hard-currency debt?
- •Positives to rely on; developments to be warned of
- •Key messages
- •Signposts and triggers for change
- •Pictures that tell the story
- •Overview of EM asset calls
- •EM growth challenges return
- •Late cycle is not kind to EM, but no blow-ups this time
- •Equities: Cheapening as expected, amid tighter liquidity
- •Box 1: What do asset, product and labour markets tell us about the stage of the economic cycle?
- •Box 1: What do asset, product and labour markets tell us about the stage of the economic cycle? (continued)
- •Chinese equities better placed than many in EM
- •Currencies: Better total returns
- •Box 2: How far are we from capitulation in EM equities?
- •Box 3: How can investors overcome EM's weakest link – currencies?
- •Top trades for 2019
- •1. Long China A-shares vs EM ex China, Long USDCNY
- •2. Long MSCI EM Value vs MSCI EM Growth
- •3. Long 10y Indian government bonds vs MSCI India
- •5. Long G3 currencies vs KRW
- •6. Long CZK vs ZAR
- •7. Long 10y Russia OFZ, long RUBCAD
- •8. Long NTN-F 2025, Long BRLCOP
- •9. Receive 2Y Mexico TIIE rates
- •China (too) makes difficult choices now
- •Box 4: Can a more globally accepted CNY help fund a potential deficit in China?
- •Box 5: How sensitive are global assets to a weaker CNY?
- •Box 5: How sensitive are global assets to a weaker CNY? (Continued)
- •Equities: Probing what is cheap and why
- •The 'where and how' of EM being cheap – taking a lens to EM multiples
- •The consensus and reality on earnings
- •Our bottom-up numbers agree with the top-down
- •Understanding the size, sector and country reads
- •Box 6: Can Indian equities find their groove?
- •Can the consumption story recover?
- •Temporary liquidity squeeze or credit shock?
- •Box 6: Can Indian equities find their groove? (continued)
- •Have valuations adjusted enough for a re-examination?
- •Growth or Value?
- •Leading indicators suggest Growth heavyweights, consumer and tech, will remain under pressure for now
- •Box 7: Semiconductors: Where next for the fading 'Memory Supernova'?
- •A different size and nature of stimulus from China
- •Currencies: A shift in pressure points
- •That unravelled fast
- •Box 8: What reforms can we expect from Brazil?
- •Box 9: What is the collateral damage from China's inclusion in global indices?
- •A narrowing growth gap against DM still, but for different reasons
- •Can external balances, carry and valuation help EMFX withstand the relative growth challenges?
- •Box 10: Why is EM growth not benefitting from stronger US growth?
- •We find few currencies to be cheap enough to withstand further pressure.
- •The CNY will remain a source of volatility
- •Main risks to our views
- •Local rates: Buffered by term premia & real rates
- •Another challenging year ahead, but past worst
- •Has value been re-built?
- •Which markets are rich, and which are cheap?
- •Which local rates are sensitive to FX and credit?
- •Box 11: Which EM debt market is most vulnerable to slower portfolio flows?
- •Box 12: What will ECB and BoJ normalisation mean for EM assets?
- •Box 12: What will ECB and BoJ normalisation mean for EM assets? (continued)
- •Monetary policy expectations: what’s mispriced?
- •Curve shapes – where’s the alpha?
- •Box 13: Where is term premium in EM local currency debt?
- •Putting everything together
- •Credit: Help from more realistic risk premia
- •No large step adjustment due in EM credit
- •A modest widening amid weak growth is the base case
- •CNY volatility will mean greater pressure on EM corporates
- •Box 15: Will onshore defaults continue in China?
- •Political calendar
- •Performance of 2018 top trades
- •UBS FX & macroeconomic forecasts
- •Valuation Method and Risk Statement
vk.com/id446425943
Box 6: Can Indian equities find their groove?
We expect India's real GDP growth to underwhelm expectations. H2 FY19 is likely to see a sharp slowdown owing to headwinds, including tighter financial conditions, high oil prices, slowing global growth and a still muted private corporate capex recovery. High-frequency indicators (Figure 100) suggest that the growth momentum in demand seen earlier this year in the auto sector has come down materially in the recent months. Weakening economic growth is also corroborated by coal production and petrol/diesel consumption data. The recovery we expect in FY20 may also be milder than consensus expectations. We expect 7–8% cuts to consensus earnings estimates for FY19 and FY20.
Figure 100: High-frequency indicators suggest sluggish growth
|
Sep-17 |
Oct-17 |
Nov-17 |
Dec-17 |
Jan-18 |
Feb-18 |
Mar-18 |
Apr-18 |
May-18 |
Jun-18 |
Jul-18 |
Aug-18 |
Sep-18 |
|
Consumption activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cars + UVs (domestic) |
11% |
0% |
14% |
5% |
8% |
8% |
6% |
7% |
20% |
38% |
-3% |
-2% |
-6% |
|
2W volumes (domestic) |
9% |
-3% |
23% |
41% |
33% |
24% |
19% |
17% |
9% |
22% |
8% |
3% |
4% |
|
2W volumes (domestic, ex scooters) |
7% |
-4% |
20% |
37% |
27% |
24% |
25% |
19% |
14% |
23% |
10% |
5% |
8% |
|
Domestic+international airline passengers |
16% |
20% |
17% |
17% |
19% |
23% |
26% |
24% |
15% |
17% |
20% |
15% |
17% |
|
Business activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal production |
10% |
4% |
1% |
0% |
4% |
1% |
9% |
15% |
12% |
12% |
10% |
2% |
6% |
|
Cement production |
0% |
-1% |
17% |
18% |
20% |
23% |
14% |
22% |
13% |
13% |
11% |
14% |
12% |
|
Steel consumption |
2% |
6% |
9% |
6% |
7% |
28% |
11% |
8% |
9% |
11% |
5% |
7% |
|
|
Power generation |
5% |
3% |
2% |
1% |
6% |
3% |
4% |
1% |
4% |
5% |
5% |
3% |
5% |
|
Diesel consumption |
17% |
-2% |
8% |
9% |
15% |
6% |
8% |
3% |
0% |
8% |
5% |
4% |
-1% |
|
Petrol consumption |
18% |
6% |
5% |
11% |
16% |
10% |
14% |
9% |
2% |
15% |
8% |
8% |
4% |
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal credit (nominal) |
17% |
16% |
17% |
19% |
20% |
20% |
18% |
19% |
19% |
18% |
17% |
18% |
15% |
|
Personal credit (real) |
14% |
12% |
12% |
14% |
15% |
16% |
14% |
15% |
14% |
13% |
13% |
15% |
15% |
|
Balance of Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports |
25% |
-2% |
31% |
16% |
14% |
5% |
0% |
4% |
21% |
19% |
16% |
19% |
-2% |
|
Non-oil exports |
22% |
-2% |
29% |
16% |
7% |
3% |
2% |
6% |
11% |
11% |
16% |
12% |
-4% |
|
Non-oil non gems & jewellery exports |
26% |
3% |
29% |
18% |
8% |
4% |
5% |
11% |
15% |
13% |
15% |
10% |
0% |
|
Imports |
19% |
9% |
24% |
21% |
26% |
11% |
7% |
2% |
15% |
21% |
28% |
25% |
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: CEIC, Haver, UBS
Can the consumption story recover?
UBS Evidence Lab’s sixth survey of about 1,600 urban Indian consumers does not point toward an imminent demand recovery. Note that rising consumer leverage has played a major role (one-third) in the past two years' non-food private consumption expenditure growth. However, the gap between consumption and income growth implies that the tighter liquidity (attributable to the reversal in benign liquidity conditions of the past three years) may have an adverse impact on discretionary consumption and overall macro growth in the near term.
Temporary liquidity squeeze or credit shock?
Our base case remains that India is experiencing a liquidity squeeze, not a new credit shock, although the negative feedback loop causing the latter merits tracking. The government announced the bailout of ILFS, reflecting its intention to prevent the negative feedback loop. We expect RBI to neutralise the liquidity squeeze, but the easy money of the past three to four years is not set to return any time soon.
NBFCs and wholesale funded banks have been key beneficiaries of benign liquidity, and the reversal in liquidity implies that funding for NBFCs may remain tight. The recent adverse sentiment in the bond market could mean even higher borrowing costs for them. They are likely to experience lower growth/margins. We remain underweight wholesale funded banks/non-banks and small and mid caps (SMIDs). We remain overweight private banks with retail liability franchises.
Global Macro Strategy 19 November 2018 |
49 |
vk.com/id446425943
Box 6: Can Indian equities find their groove? (continued)
Have valuations adjusted enough for a re-examination?
The recent de-rating and 10-year bond yields coming off 40bp since September 2018 highs still leaves a gap that is quite high historically (Figure 101). However, not at levels that suggests a buying opportunity.
Figure 101: High-frequency indicators suggest sluggish growth
10% |
|
|
10-y Gsec |
|
|
Earnings yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
Source: Bloomberg, UBS
Markets have de-rated from 19x 1yr fwd P/E to 16x. Although we do not expect the recent liquidity squeeze to become a prolonged credit crunch, the period of easy money over past three to four years has passed. The worst of INR depreciation vs GEMs may have passed too. However, two risks remain: 1) the result of the 2019 election (link); and 2) retail flows (link). The latter have hovered near zero in the recent months, despite non-SIP flows coming off materially since late last year. While the SIP flows remain intact, it remains to be seen whether they hold up in the event of continued market weakness. We believe a reversal of SIP flows is a risk under-priced by the market, as we highlighted here.
Our Nifty scenarios imply that it is not yet time to buy on dips
Our Nifty scenarios: 9,500 as base case for March 2019 and 11,100/8,300 upside/downside scenarios. The base case is premised on 13/17% earnings growth in FY19/FY20 (7–9% lower than consensus estimates) and 16x P/E, in line with the average of the past five years.
Gautam Chhaochharia
Global Macro Strategy 19 November 2018 |
50 |
vk.com/id446425943
Growth or Value?
Value has beaten Growth in 2018, but their relative index remains at the 12th percentile of its historical distribution since 1997 (Figure 102). This ratio is even more stretched for DM. It is largely EM Value sectors, such as materials, energy, financials and utilities that are cheap relative to DM, while Growth-overweight sectors – consumer discretionary, consumer staples and health care – still screen as expensive.
EM Value has room to beat EM Growth in 2019
Figure 102: MSCI EM and DM: Value/Growth relative indices
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12th |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
percentile |
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
3rd percentile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
00 |
03 |
06 |
09 |
12 |
15 |
18 |
|
MSCI EM Value/Growth |
|
MSCI DM Value/Growth |
Source: MSCI, Datastream, UBS
Figure 103: Percentile of current 12m fwd P/E relative to MSCI World (since 2002) vs 6m revisions in 12m fwd EPS
25 |
6m change |
|
in 12m |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
forward EPS |
ENE |
|
|
15Cheap and being upgraded
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
MAT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
REL |
EM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEL |
|
||
|
IND |
FIN |
|
|
|
|
|
-5 |
|
ITS |
UTL |
CST |
|
|
HTC |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
-10 |
|
|
|
CDS |
Expensive |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
and being |
|
-15 |
|
|
|
|
|
downgraded |
|
0% |
20% |
40% |
|
60% |
80% |
100% |
12m fPE relative to DM (percentile since 2002)
Source: IBES, MSCI, Datastream, UBS
These expensive Growth-oriented sectors are precisely the ones facing larger earnings downgrades (Figure 103). The few markets in which we have seen EPS upgrades – Russia, Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Taiwan – have been driven by their deep value sectors: energy and mining. A China infrastructure stimulus should be less relevant for the rest of the EM in this cycle, but should provide some support for commodities, and therefore for Value stocks, over a threeto six-month horizon. Meanwhile, Growth is still adjusting.
EM Growth sectors are facing bigger earnings downgrades than EM Value sectors
Global Macro Strategy 19 November 2018 |
51 |
vk.com/id446425943
Leading indicators suggest Growth heavyweights, consumer and tech, will remain under pressure for now
Consumer sentiment indices across the major constituent countries of the MSCI EM consumer discretionary (Figure 104) show a reasonably strong correlation with trends in EM consumer stocks (Figure 105). Into early 2019 we expect EM consumer spending and consumer sentiment to weaken further as housing markets weaken modestly, financial conditions tighten and trade incomes slow down. This will keep EM Growth under some pressure.
An EM-wide consumer sentiment index explains the performance of MSCI EM consumer discretionary stocks
Figure 104: MSCI EM consumer discretionary: Country composition
Figure 105: Wt avg. percentile of consumer sentiment indices vs composite cons disc price index
|
|
Malaysia |
Others |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
Mexico |
1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia |
5.7% |
90 |
Correlation: +0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
||||||
2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2.9% |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
China |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan |
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
||
|
29.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
3.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
4.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
10.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Korea |
|
South Africa |
06 |
07 |
08 |
09 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
|
15.2% |
|
|
|
|
Wt avg. percentile of consumer sentiment indices |
||||||||||
|
|
24.2% |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Cons Disc price index (RHS) |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Source: MSCI, Datastream, UBS |
|
|
Source: Haver, MSCI, Datastream, UBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our new UBS Tech Index, that we also used in our MSCI EM first principal component of three series: i) y/y growth in global semiconductor sales; ii) Japan memory chips sales to inventory (3mma); and iii) Japan semiconductor devices sales to inventory (3mma) – is strongly correlated with the level of the MSCI EM index and underlying earnings (Figure 106). The index peaked in September 2017, and has been a harbinger of the ongoing down market for IT globally. In the absence of any signs of a turning point, and being roughly only halfway back to its 2015 trough levels, our Tech Index gives little optimism on the EM IT sector in the coming months.
Our new UBS Tech Index – a harbinger of the EM tech cycle – shows little optimism for the sector
Another metric, which should become even more relevant for EM Tech after the upcoming GICS re-classification, is DRAM prices. Spot prices have shown a correlation of over 90% with the MSCI EM IT index since the start of the EM 'bull market' in 2016 (Figure 107). That said, EM IT 12-month trailing earnings have not yet been affected as contract prices remained at their peak levels until last month, while share prices have been pricing in the deteriorating outlook. Our analysts expect the DRAM downcycle to continue for the next six to seven quarters, with a c45% peak-to-trough decline. This is a more pessimistic forecast than consensus projections and recent guidance from Samsung Electronics. Please see the box on the semiconductor cycle from the UBS head of APAC Tech Research, Nicolas Gaudois, on the following pages.
DRAM prices should fall further; UBS has more pessimistic forecasts than consensus and Samsung's guidance
Global Macro Strategy 19 November 2018 |
52 |
vk.com/id446425943
Figure 106: UBS Tech Index vs MSCI EM IT price index and 12m trailing EPS
250 |
Dec- |
|
2.5 |
2010=100 |
|
||
230 |
Correlation with UBS Tech Index: |
2.0 |
|
|
+0.75 |
||
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
1.0 |
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
-0.5 |
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
Correlation with UBS Tech |
-1.0 |
|
|
||
70 |
|
-1.5 |
|
|
Index: +0.62 |
||
50 |
|
|
-2.0 |
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MSCI EM IT: Price index
MSCI EM IT: 12m trailing EPS
First principal component of tech indicators (RHS)
Source: Haver, Bloomberg, MSCI, Datastream, UBS
Figure 107: DRAM prices vs MSCI EM IT price index and 12m trailing EPS
|
Jun-2016 |
$10 |
|
185 |
=100 |
$9 |
|
Corr b/w DRAM spot |
|||
|
and MSCI EM IT 12m |
$8 |
|
165 |
trailing EPS: +0.69 |
||
|
|||
|
|
||
|
|
$7 |
|
145 |
|
$6 |
|
|
|
||
125 |
|
$5 |
|
|
|
Corr b/w DRAM spot
$4
105 and MSCI EM IT $3
Price index: +0.92
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Jun-16 |
Nov-16 |
Apr-17 |
Sep-17 |
Feb-18 |
Jul-18 |
MSCI EM IT: 12m trailing EPS
MSCI EM IT: Price index
DRAM (8Gb DDR4) spot price (RHS)
DRAM (8Gb DDR4) contract price (RHS)
Source: DRAMeXchange, MSCI, Datastream, UBS
In the context of an unappealing outlook for the two major EM Growth sectors – IT and consumer discretionary – we recommend being long EM Value relative to EM Growth as a near-term trade. Once valuations have adjusted, we expect Growth stocks to offer better exposure to EM's more dynamic segments and to constitute a better medium-term investment. So far, investors remain overweight in Growth-oriented stocks despite the fact that market sentiment has retreated nearly two-thirds from the market peak earlier this year towards the 2016 market trough – please see our box on 'capitulation' in EM equities for further detail.
Long EM Value relative to EM Growth in the near term
Global Macro Strategy 19 November 2018 |
53 |