Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
English_Tenses_Theory.doc
Скачиваний:
12
Добавлен:
05.12.2018
Размер:
367.1 Кб
Скачать

II. The contracted affirmative forms are:

I’d be working

He’d be working

The contracted negative forms are:

I shouldn’t be working

He wouldn’t be working

The negative-interrogative forms are:

Should I not be working?

Shouldn’t you be working?

Would he not be working?

Wouldn’t he be working?

THE USE OF THE FUTURE-CONTINUOUS-IN-THE-PAST

I. The formation of the Future-Continuous-in-the-Past

The Future-Continuous-in-the-Past denotes a concrete action going on at a definite moment (occasionally covering a whole period of time in the future) when that future moment is viewed from the past.

I told him not to come at six o’clock because I should be having my lesson at that

time.

I felt sure they would be discussing the same problem when I called.

THE FUTURE-PERFECT-IN-THE-PAST

I. The formation of the Future-Perfect-in-the-Past

The Future-Perfect-in-the-Past is formed by means of the Future-Indefinite-in-the-Past of the auxiliary verb to have and Participle II of the notional verb.

In the interrogative form the auxiliary verb is placed before the subject.

In the negative form the negative particle not is placed after the first auxiliary verb.

Affirmative

Interrogative

Negative

I should have worked

Should I have worked?

I should not have worked

You would have worked

Would you have worked?

You would not have worked

He/she/it would have worked

Would he/she/it

have worked?

He/she/it would not have worked

We should have work

Should we have worked?

We shouldn’t have worked

They would have work

Would they have worked?

They shouldn’t have worked

II. The contracted affirmative forms are:

I’d have worked

He’d have worked

The contracted negative forms are:

I shouldn’t have worked

He wouldn’t have worked

The negative-interrogative forms are:

Should I have worked?

Shouldn’t I have worked?

Would he not have worked?

Wouldn’t he have worked?

III. The use of the Future-Perfect-in-the-Past

1. The Future-Perfect-in-the-Past is used to denote an action completed before a definite moment which was future from the point of view of the past.

I wondered whether they would have reached the place by noon.

They assured me that they would have finished their work by six o’clock.

    1. An action begun before a given future moment and continued into that future moment, in both cases when the future moment is viewed from the past.

She wrote to me that by the first of July she would have been at the seaside for a

fortnight.

HE FUTURE-PERFECT-CONTINUOUS-IN-THE-PAST TENSE

I. The formation of the Future-Continuous-in-the-Past

The Future-Continuous-in-the-Past is formed by means of the Future-Perfect-in-the-Past of the auxiliary verb to be and Participle I of the notional verb.

In the interrogative form of the first auxiliary verb is placed before the subject.

In the negative form the negative particle not is placed after the first auxiliary verb.

Affirmative

Interrogative

Negative

I should have

been working

Should I have

been working?

I should not have

been working

You would have

been working

Would you have

been working?

He would not have

been working

He/she/it would have been working

Would he/she/it have

been working?

He/she/it would not have been working

We should have

been working

Should we have

been working?

We should not have been working

They would have

been working

Would they have

been working?

They would not have

been working

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]