Добавил:
Upload
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:теор.грамматика / Лекция 3.pptx
X
- •Lecture 3
- •ENGLISH PARTS OF SPEECH
- •THE PRO NO UN is a partofspeech w hich points outobjects and theirqualities
- •Functions ofthe pronouns
- •Gram m aticalcategories ofthe pronouns
- •THE ARTICLE
- •The ADJECTIVE
- •The Adjective
- •Statives
- •A-adjectives are the separate part of speech – ‘the category of state words’
- •A-AD JECTIVES
- •The Verb
- •The Gram m atical Categories ofthe English Verb
- •Subclasses ofverbs
- •NO TIO NAL VERBS
- •The aspectfeatures ofverbal sem antics
- •The com binatory potentialofthe verb
- •(SEM I)FUNCTIO NAL VERBS
- •English verbaltense form s
- •The future tense form s
- •Status of shall/w ill,should /w ould
- •Etym ology ofshall/w ill
- •Abraham Lincoln
- •That’s all, folks!
Status of shall/w ill,should /w ould
22
O. Jespersen and
L.S. Barkhudarov, state that shall/will,
should/ would are modals denoting intention, command, request, promise, etc. in a weakened form, e.g.: I’ll go there by train. = I
intend (want, plan) to go there by train. On this basis they deny the existence of the verbal future tense in English.
Otto Jespersen
Etym ology ofshall/w ill
Etymologically they are the verbs of obligation (shall) and volition (will).
shall/will and should/would are in their immediate etymology modal verbs.
23
Abraham Lincoln
‘I will never be old enough to speak without embarrassmen t when I have nothing to say’
24
That’s all, folks!
Соседние файлы в папке теор.грамматика