Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
55
Добавлен:
17.08.2013
Размер:
326.85 Кб
Скачать

ENTRY OF DNAs INTO GELS

161

Figure 5.33 How DNA knotting may prevent gel entry. Jean Viovy has obtained evidence that is consistent with the notion that knots are responsible for irreversible trapping

of DNA within the gels. But there is still no direct proof for this idea (Viovy et al., 1992).

BOX 5.2

PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF DNA ELECTROPHORESIS

The ideal PFG fractionations would be rapid, high-yield resolution separations and allow larger quantities of sample to be purified to increase the ease and sensitivity of subsequent analyses. This ideal is not achievable because both speed and sample size generally lead to a loss in resolution, for reasons that are not fully understood.

The quality of PFG separations strongly deteriorates as DNA concentration is raised. Samples should be run at the lowest concentrations that allow proper visualization or other necessary analysis of the data or utilization of the separated samples. Examples are presented in Panel A.

(continued)

162 PRINCIPLES OF DNA ELECTROPHORESIS

BOX 5.2 (Continued)

Panel A. Effect of DNA Concentration on Apparent Electrophoretic Mobility (Adapted from Doggett et al. 1992)

In ordinary agarose electrophoresis of DNA, most band broadening occurs not by dif-

 

 

 

fusion but by an electrical-field-dependent process called

 

 

 

 

 

 

dispersion.

The factors that

produce this dispersion remain to be clarified (Yarmola et al., 1996).

 

 

 

 

 

In PFG separations in all generally used apparatus,

a

trade-off

must

be

made

 

between band sharpness (resolution) and how straight the lanes are. The use of field

 

gradients, an inherent property of the first PFG instrument designs, leads to band

 

sharpening. However, no successful design of a PFG apparatus has been demonstrated

 

 

 

that produces straight lanes and still allows gradients

to

be

present

to

sharpen

the

 

bands. Examples of the trade-offs before resolution and

straightness

are

shown

in

 

Panel B.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Panel B. Effect of a Gradient in Electrical Field on the Apparent Sharpness

 

 

 

 

of Bands

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The basic mechanism by which gradients lead to band

sharpening is

shown

in

 

 

Panel C:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(continued)

ENTRY OF DNAs INTO GELS

163

BOX 5.2 (Continued)

Panel C. Rationale of the Effect of Electrical Field Gradients

Because molecules at the back of the zone are moving faster than those at the front, they will catch up until limits on zone thickness are reached that broaden the zone either by dispersion or by concentration-dependent effects.

Band sharpening can also be achieved by other methods. For example, a gradient of increasing gel concentration will mimic the effect of a gradient of decreasing electrical field strengths.

164 PRINCIPLES OF DNA ELECTROPHORESIS

SOURCES AND ADDITIONAL READINGS

Birren, B., and Lai, E., eds. 1993.

 

 

Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis

 

. San Diego: Academic Press.

 

Birren, B., and Lai, E. 1994. Rapid pulsed field separation of DNA molecules up to 250 kb.

 

 

 

Nucleic

Acids Research

22: 5366–5370.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bustamante, C., Vesenka, J., Tang, C. L., Rees, W., Guthold, M., and Keller, R. 1992. Circular DNA

 

 

 

molecules imaged in air by scanning force microscopy.

 

 

 

 

Biochemistry

31: 22–26.

 

Cantor, C. R., and Schimmel, P. R. 1980.

 

 

 

 

Biophysical

Chemistry

. San

Francisco: W. H. Freeman,

 

ch. 24.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carlsson, C., and Larsson, A. 1996.

Simulations

of

the

overshoot in

the build-up of orientation

 

 

 

of long DNA during gel electrophoresis based on

a distribution

of oscillation

times.

 

 

 

Electrophoresis

17: 1425–1435.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Desruisseaux, C., and Slater, G. W. 1996. Pulsed-field trapping electrophoresis: A computer simula-

 

 

 

tion study.

Electrophoresis

 

17: 623–632.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doggett, N. A., Smith, C. L., and Cantor, C. R. 1992. The effect of DNA concentration on mobility

 

 

 

 

in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

 

 

 

Nucleic Acids Research

20: 859–864.

 

 

Duke, T. A. J., Austin, R. H., Cox, E. C., and Chan, S. S. 1996. Pulsed-field electrophoresis in mi-

 

 

crolithographic arrays.

Electrophoresis

 

 

17: 1075–1079.

 

 

 

 

Frank-Kamenetskii, M. F. 1997.

 

 

Unraveling DNA.

 

Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

 

 

 

Gurrieri, S., Smith, S. B., Wells, K. S., Johnson, I. D., and Bustamante, C. 1996. Real-time imaging

 

 

of the reorientation mechanisms of YOYO-labelled DNA molecules during 90 degrees and 120

 

 

 

degrees pulsed field gel electrophoresis.

 

 

 

 

Nucleic Acids Research

24: 4759–4767.

 

Monaco, A. P., ed. 1995.

 

Pulsed

Field

Gel

Electrophoresis:

A Practical Approach

 

 

. New York:

Oxford University Press.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nordén,

B., Elvingson, C.,

Jonsson,

M. and

Åkerman,

B.

1991.

Microscopic

behavior

of

 

 

DNA during electrophoresis: electrophoretic orientation.

 

 

 

Quarterly Review of Biophysics

24:

103–164.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schwartz, D., and Cantor, C. R. 1984. Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field

 

 

 

 

gradient gel electrophoresis.

 

 

 

Cell 37: 67–75.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Smith, M. A., and Bar-Yam, Y. 1993. Cellular automaton simulation of pulsed field gel elec-

 

 

trophoresis.

Electrophoresis

 

14: 337–343.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Turmel, C., Brassard, E., Slater, G. W., and Noolandi, J. 1990. Molecular detrapping and band nar-

 

 

 

rowing with high frequency modulation of pulsed field electrophoresis.

 

 

 

Nucleic Acids Research

 

18: 569–575.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ulanovsky, L., Drouin, G., and Gilbert, W. 1990. DNA trapping electrophoresis.

 

 

Nature

343:

190–192.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Viovy, J. L., Miomandre, F., Miquel,

M. C., Caron, F., and Sor,

F. 1992.

Irreversible trapping of

 

 

 

DNA during crossed-field gel electrophoresis.

 

 

 

Electrophoresis

13: 1–6.

 

 

Whitcomb, R. W., and Holzwarth, G. 1990. On the movement and alignment of DNA during 120

 

 

 

 

degrees pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

 

 

 

 

Nucleic Acids Research

18: 6331–6338.

 

Yarmola, E., Sokoloff, H., and Chrambach, A. 1996. The relative contributions of dispersion and

 

 

 

diffusion to band spreading (resolution) in gel electrophoresis.

 

 

Electrophoresis

17: 1416–1419.

Zhang, T.-Y., Smith, C. L.,

and Cantor,

C. R.

1991.

Secondary pulsed field gel electrophoresis:

 

 

a

new method

for faster separation

of

larger

DNA

molecules.

 

 

 

Nucleic

Acids Research

 

19: 1291–1296.

Соседние файлы в папке genomics1-10