Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4581_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
46
5 Injuries oftheEyelids, Canaliculi, andCanthi
Fig. 5.8 (a) Partial- thickness laceration of the left lower eyelid. (b, c) Postoperative aspect of the same patient 6months after the injury
a
b
c
of the laceration in relation to the muscle bers of the m. orbicularis oculi. Lacerations parallel to the muscle bers do not tend to gape even in cases of laceration of the underlying dia­phragms. When the wound forms an angle or is vertical to the muscle bers, it tends to gape and in cases of injury of the underlying dia­phragms, fat herniation is possible (Mustardé
1991). Small, partial-thickness lacerations par-
allel to the muscle bers may not need suturing, especially in children. Wound approximation and xation with steristrips usually sufce. Larger wounds are sutured using either inter-
rupted (Prolene 6.0 or Nylon 6.0) (Fig.5.9) or a continuous suture (Prolene 5.0 or 4.0). Partial­thickness lacerations at an angle or vertical to and involvement of the muscle bers are best closed in two layers. The muscle bers are sutured with interrupted Vicryl 5.0 or 6.0 sutures and the skin as described above. Meticulous adaptation of the muscle at the upper eyelid fold is mandatory in order to restore its form. Multiple lacerations are treated with the same principles as mentioned for sin­gle lacerations. Sutures are usually removed on the fth postoperative day.
5.2 Eyelid andCanalicular Lacerations
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
47
Fig. 5.9 (a, b) Male patient with left upper and lower eyelid lacerations, which were sutured with interrupted
6.0 nylon sutures
Fig. 5.10 Male patient with full-thickness laceration of the left upper and lower eyelids
ab
Presence of multiple scraping lacerations (abrasions) requires careful cleaning with an antiseptic solution (e.g., Cetavlon 1%) and thor­ough removal of all foreign bodies and dirt in order to avoid permanent skin tattooing. Special care is taken during debridement not to remove tissue which may be viable. Eyelids have a rich vascular supply, and even “dodgy” tissue may nally survive. Extensive debridement may lead
to extensive scarring with resulting deformation. Deeper abrasions may need suturing, and super­cial ones are treated with local antibiotics (3× daily) or are dressed with a non-adherent dress­ing (e.g., Jelonet) which promotes epithelializa­tion. Change of dressing is required daily.
Full-thickness lacerations involve all three layers of the eyelids (Figs.5.10 and 5.11). They are usually oblique, and not vertical, due to the protection of the supraorbital margin, the nose, and the cheeks. Occasionally, they extend to the underlying cornea; therefore, thorough preopera­tive eye examination is of great importance. Aim of closure in the marginal lacerations is the exact adaptation of the wound edges to avoid excessive scar formation and notching.
When full-thickness lacerations are sutured, it is advisable to use a cornea shield in order to avoid iatrogenic cornea abrasions. When approx­imating the wound surfaces, a guiding suture is rst placed at the gray line. Several techniques exist to close the full-thickness lacerations. All aim at suturing three layers: tarsus/conjunctiva, orbicularis oculi muscle, and skin. Care is taken to place the knots of the rst layer facing the tar­sus to avoid cornea damage. Interrupted sutures are used by the author, whereas other surgeons prefer continuous sutures for this purpose (Mustardé 1991). Finally, two last sutures are placed on each side of the gray line, which achieves a stable reapproximation of the free margin. The ends are left long and attached to the skin. If the wound is extended beyond the eyelid, the remainder is closed in layers. Steristrips cover the sutures, and ophthalmic ointment is used for the conjunctiva. Additional incisions or Z-plasties
48
5 Injuries oftheEyelids, Canaliculi, andCanthi
a
b c
de
Fig. 5.11 (a, b) Female patient with serious left perior- bital injury. There is a full-thickness laceration of the upper eyelid, a small laceration of the lower eyelid, and extensive hyposphagma. (c) CT scan of the same patient showing extensive bony injury of the left side of the
orbital face. (d) Postoperative illustration 2weeks after repair of the injury. (e) Postoperative illustration 1 year later. A left enophthalmos was surgically corrected in the meantime
are avoided during primary closure. If both eye­lids are injured, the same principles are applied for the lower as well as the upper eyelid.
Traumatic eyelid avulsion (Fig. 5.12) is reported infrequently. Surgical reimplantation is possible even 10h after injury, especially if the avulsed part has been handled properly. Goldberg et al. (1992) conducted an experimental study, after successful reimplantation of an avulsed upper eyelid (>75% of total eyelid surface) and suggested that eyelid tissues should not be immersed in saline and should be stored at 4°C, and if reimplantation time is <6 h, storage in a cold, moist environment is adequate. In cases of a total eyelid avulsion, meticulous microsurgical techniques are necessary for reanastomosis of the arterial supply to the avulsed eyelid. Fortunately, these cases are rare and often result after animal bites (Soueid etal. 2006).
Close attention must be paid to avoid vertical tension on the wound site or surrounding tissues of a repaired lower eyelid during closure because this increases lid retraction and the possibility of postoperative ectropion or lagophthalmos.
Postoperative care includes liberal application of topical antibiotic ointment to the wound, avoiding sun and water exposure, and limiting makeup application for 2–3 weeks (Chang and Rubin 2002).
Canalicular involvement has been reported to occur in 36% of eyelid injuries (Naik etal. 2008). The lower canaliculus is more frequently injured (54.1%) than the upper (33.3%). Injury of both canaliculi is less frequent (12.5%) as was reported in a study of 66 cases with eyelid injuries (Naik etal. 2008) (Fig.5.13).
Direct, indirect, or diffuse forces may injure canaliculi. Avulsive blunt injuries (due to indirect or diffuse trauma) accounted for 45.7% of the lacerations, whereas direct penetrating injuries were more frequent and accounted for 55.2% of the canalicular lacerations in a study of 236 patients from the University of Ottawa Eye Institute, Ottawa, Canada (Jordan et al. 2008). Lacerations involving other parts of the eyelids, periocular area, and face made up the greatest number of associated injuries and occurred with equal frequency in the direct penetrating group
5.2 Eyelid andCanalicular Lacerations
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
49
a
bc
de
Fig. 5.12 (a, b) Male patient with a complex left perior- bital injury. There is a partial avulsion of the upper eyelid and a full-thickness laceration of the lower eyelid. (c)
Preoperative picture clearly showing the partially avulsed upper eyelid. (d) Immediate postoperative picture. (e) The same patient 1year after initial repair
interest in oculoplastic surgery across the United Kingdom were sent questionnaires to determine caseload, intraoperative techniques (magnica­tion, suture, and stents), and postoperative man­agement (antibiotic use, stent placement and replacement, and secondary lacrimal surgery) of patients with canalicular injury. Eighty-nine (74%) questionnaires were returned and analyzed. Most of the respondents (63%) treated between one and ve canalicular injuries over the previous year. Thirty-eight (43%) of them would repair a
Fig. 5.13 Patient with naso-orbital injury extending to the right canalicular system
monocanalicular injury only if the lower canalicu­lus was involved, and 36 (40%) would always repair a monocanalicular injury. Eighty-two
and the indirect/diffuse group. More serious associated injuries including orbital fractures, globe rupture, other body injuries, and head trauma were more commonly seen when diffuse trauma was involved (Jordan etal. 2008).
The management of lacrimal canalicular injury is controversial. There is disagreement among surgeons regarding technique (use of magnica­tion, sutures, catheters–stents) and postoperative management. Data provided by the study by Ho and Lee (2006) are indicative of the existing con­troversy. One hundred and twenty National Health Service-based consultant ophthalmologists with
(92%) respondents used magnication during sur­gery. Fifty-one would never consider using the pigtail probe. Eighty-ve (96%) would use the bubble test and/or uorescein dye to locate the severed medial canalicular end. Vicryl or Dexon was the suture of choice for 76 (85%) and 63 (71%) respondents for repairing pericanalicular and canalicular tissues, respectively. Thirteen respondents did not stent their canalicular repairs. Forty-seven (53%) routinely used prophylactic antibiotics. Finally, 76% of the respondents would wait between 3 and 12months before undertaking further lacrimal surgery (Ho and Lee 2006).
50
5 Injuries oftheEyelids, Canaliculi, andCanthi
A review of the literature conrmed the exist­ing controversy regarding the treatment of cana­licular injuries. Surgical repair of monocanalicular injuries ranges from urgent primary microsurgi­cal repair (Struck 2009) to simple closure of the supercial m. orbicularis oculi and skin without canalicular reconstruction (Smit and Mourits
2000). The latter, simple way of treatment
resulted in a totally blocked canaliculus in all patients. In spite of this, however, none of the patients experienced epiphora either indoors or outdoors. At a follow-up 3–33 months post­trauma (mean 13.7months), tear drainage of the ipsilateral unharmed canaliculus was functioning normally in such a way that epiphora was pre­vented (Smit and Mourits 2000).
A recent literature search concluded that monocanalicular stents seem to be efcacious and well tolerated, although extrusion rates vary from 0% to 29% (Wladis etal. 2019). Additionally, canalicular laceration repair with Mini Monoka stent in children younger than 10years showed good outcomes both anatomical and functional irrespective of time lag since injury (Agarval etal. 2021).
The author of this study was trained to always repair the lower canaliculus using magnication and stents and not repair the upper canaliculus, merely suturing the supercial injured layers.
Potential complications of monocanalicular stent repair include extrusion (most commonly), tube displacement, granuloma, ectropion, slit punctum, stula, and infection (Wladis et al.
2019).
Postoperative follow-up reveals the presence, or not, of epiphora or dacryocystitis, in which case secondary lacrimal surgery is indicated. Waiting time is usually 6 months after primary
repair. It should be noted that success rate of pri­mary repair is roughly 70–82% (Struck et al.
2004). Tint etal. (2011) reported a minimal, mild,
and moderate epiphora of 18%, 12.5%, and 2.5%, respectively, after bicanalicular surgical repair and stenting (bicanalicular Crawford stent).
Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), the removal of bone lying between the lacrimal sac and the nose and creation of an anastomosis between median wall of the sac and nasal mucosa, has a success rate of 87.5% (Struck etal. 2004). In cases without prior DCR, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy has a similar success rate (83.3%—Kim et al.
2013). However, only 57.1% of the revision cases
reported resolution of epiphora after endoscopic DCR (Kim etal. 2013). External dacryocystorhi­nostomy with silicon intubation remains one of the most effective procedures for patients with trau­matic lacrimal blockage (Sodhi etal. 2003).
5.3 Medial andLateral Canthus
Lacerations
The medial canthal tendon is a strong structure with an average breaking strength of 36 Newtons and an elongation of 6.25 mm (Dagum et al.
1995). In addition to its functional importance in
relation to the lacrimal pump mechanism, the medial canthus denes the intercanthal distance and the size and shape of the palpebral ssure. During trauma, partial or total disruption of its bony insertion occurs. Failure to reattach it results in medial canthal dystopia with rounding of the palpebral angle and alteration of the size and inclination of the palpebral ssure (traumatic telecanthus, Fig.5.14). Correction of this defor­mity, in cases of full rupture, requires dissection
Fig. 5.14 Patient with traumatic telecanthus. (a) Preoperatively. (b) Immediately after canthal repair (canthopexy) and reduction of the intercanthal distance
ab
5.3 Medial andLateral Canthus Lacerations
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
51
Fig. 5.15 (a, b) Anterior and lateral X-ray showing the transnasal wire and securing plates after a direct canthopexy
a b
and adequate mobilization of the medial canthal tendon, subperiosteal exposure of the medial orbit, precise identication of the correct anatom­ical location for tendon placement, and secure xation of the tendon (Antonyshyn etal. 1996). Whether as a primary or a secondary procedure, the divided ends of the severed medial canthus ought to be sought and resutured. If the medial stump cannot be identied, the canthal tendon may be xed to the periosteum of the orbital mar­gin with a 5.0 Prolene (nonabsorbable) suture. If suturing of the medial canthus to the periosteum does not adequately correct the deformity, the canthal tendon is held in place by a 0.3mm soft stainless transnasal wire, passed by means of a curved awl across the nasal cavity through a hole drilled in the opposite nasal bone and twisted/ secured over a small plate or button lying on the lateral side of the contralateral nasal bone (direct canthopexy) (Freihofer 1980; Mustardé 1991) (Fig. 5.15). The technique of transnasal wiring has been widely used. The overall results after treatment of 14 canthopexies in recent trauma cases were reported as acceptable (Freihofer
1980) (Fig.5.16). Other surgeons have preferred
the ipsilateral techniques that include the nylon anchor suture, stainless steel screw, and cantile­vered mini plates. Antonyshyn et al. (1996) described the Mitek Mini GII Anchor, which fea­tures a titanium body with a hole for suture place­ment. A drill hole is made at the precise location of tendon attachment, and the anchor is tted in the drill hole. Pulling back locks the arcs of the anchor against the bone and thus provides secure bone xation. The medial canthus is dissected,
mobilized, and secured through a suture to the bone at the anchor. Goldenberg et al. (2008) described the titanium micro-anchor device and reported stable improvement of the distance from the medial canthus to the midline 1year postop­eratively. For all patients though, nal values were lower than those initially obtained.
When the canthal ligament is still attached to a bony fragment, the latter ought to be reduced and xed by means of wire or mini plate osteo­synthesis to adjacent bone, thus indirectly repair­ing the canthal dislocation (indirect canthopexy).
A recent anatomical study showed that the anterior limb of the medial canthal ligament is the most developed and rmly adherent part. According to the authors, reattachment of that part seems to be adequate for repair of a traumati­cally detached medial canthus (Gulses et al.
2012).
It should not be forgotten that if the full­thickness injury lies medial to the punctum, the canaliculus will have been severed, and in the lower eyelid the previously described steps (see canalicular injury, same chapter) must be taken to repair this structure.
The lateral canthal ligament is attached to the orbital tubercle a few millimeters inside the lat­eral orbital margin. Because of this, the ligament pulls the lids round the globe and not simply out towards the lateral wall. Any repair of the liga­ment must try to achieve the same direction of pull of the canthus (Mustardé 1991).
Traumatic dislocation of the lateral canthus may result from injury to this structure. Suturing
52
5 Injuries oftheEyelids, Canaliculi, andCanthi
ab
Fig. 5.16 (a, b) Postoperative picture of a male patient a few weeks after direct canthopexy. The intercanthal distance is within normal limits
of the divided ligament, or the exposed cut edges of the tarsal plate with 5.0 Prolene to the stump of the ligament (inside of the orbital margin) or to the periosteum round the orbital tubercle, will repair the injury. If the injury is severe and the displacement considerable, a more secure can­thopexy may be achieved by drilling a hole in the lateral orbital wall and securing the canthus to bone.
References
Agarval R, Patidar N, Mohan A, etal. Pattern of presen-
tation and surgical outcomes of canalicular laceration repair in a pediatric population. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2021;58:42–7.
Anson BJ, McVay CB. Special senses. In: Anson BJ,
McVay CB, editors. Surgical anatomy. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1971. p.61.
Antonyshyn OM, Weinberg MJ, Dagum AB.Use of a new
anchoring device for tendon reinsertion in medial can­thopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:520–3.
Chang EL, Rubin PA.Management of complex eyelid lac-
erations. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2002;42:187–201.
Dagum AB, Antonyshyn O, Heam T.Medial canthopexy:
an experimental and biomechanical study. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35:262–5.
Freihofer HPM.Experience with transnasal canthopexy. J
Maxillofac Surg. 1980;8:119–24.
Goldberg SH, Bullock JD, Connelly PJ. Eyelid avul-
sion: a clinical and experimental study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;8:256–61.
Goldenberg DC, Bastos EO, Alonso N, etal. The role of
micro-anchor devices in medial canthopexy. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:47–51.
Gulses A, Varol A, Gayretli O, et al. Anthropometry
of the medial canthal ligament related to naso­orbitoethmoidal fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:1151–3.
Ho T, Lee V.National survey on the management of lac-
rimal canalicular injury in the United Kingdom. Clin
Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34:39–43. Jordan DR, Ziai S, Gilberg SM, et al. Pathogenesis of
canalicular lacerations. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg.
2008;24:394–8. Kim C, Kacker A, Pearlman AN, et al. Results of com-
bined multispecialty endoscopic dacryocystorhinos-
tomy. Orbit. 2013;32:156–60. Mustardé JC. Repair and reconstruction in the orbital
region. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1991. Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, etal. Management of cana-
licular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and expe-
rience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent. Am
J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:375–80. Romanes GJ. The skin and the sensory organs. In:
Romanes GJ, editor. Cunningham’s textbook of
anatomy. London: Oxford University Press; 1972.
p.812–4. Smit AJ, Mourits MP. [Absence of epiphora in patients
with a monocanalicular injury without surgical recon-
struction]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000;144:1584–7. Sodhi PK, Pandey RM, Malik KP.Experience with bican-
alicular intubation of the lacrimal drainage apparatus
combined with conventional external dacryocystorhi-
nostomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003;31:187–90. Soueid NE, Khoobehi K, Lee MR.Microsurgical replan-
tation of total upper eyelid avulsion. Ann Plast Surg.
2006;56:99–102. Struck HG. [Lacrimal system lacerations and their surgi-
cal repair]. Ophthalmologe. 2009;106:223–8. Struck HG, Horix D, Ehrich D. [Lacrimal system injuries-
primary and secondary surgical care]. Klin Monatsbl
Augenheilkd. 2004;221:609–14. Tint NL, Alexander P, Cook AE, etal. Eyelid avulsion
repair with bi-canalicular silicone stenting without
medial canthal tendon reconstruction. Br J Ophthalmol
2011;95:1389–92. Wladis EJ, Aakalu VK, Tao JP, et al. Monocanalicular
stents in eyelid lacerations: a report by the American
Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology.
2019;126:1324–9.
Injuries oftheNose
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
6
6.1 Anatomy oftheNose
The nose is a pyramidal structure situated in the middle of the face. It is composed of a bony and a cartilaginous skeleton (Fig.6.1). The free ante­rior margin (bridge) runs to its root at the fore­head and terminates below at the apex or lobule of the nose. The lateral walls of the pyramid expand into the mobile alae (wings) of the nose. The base presents two apertures or nares sepa­rated by a median column or septum (Fig.6.2). The overlying skin is thin and mobile over the root of the nose, but it is thick and adherent over the apex.
The nasal bones, the cartilage of the septum, and the three pairs of cartilages (lateral, greater, and lesser alar) make up the skeletal framework of the external nose. At the cranial end, at the root of the nose, the nasal bones articulate with the frontal bone, the perpendicular plate of the eth­moid, and the frontal process of the maxillae. At their caudal end, they are broad and thin, much exposed to trauma, whereas at the cranial end, they are narrow, thick, and well protected from injury.
The lower part of the nose has a framework of cartilages and small muscles responsible for movements of the nostrils. The lateral cartilages are situated immediately below the nasal bones.
Their anterior borders are continuous with each other and with the anterior margin of the septal cartilage, while inferiorly they are connected with the greater alar cartilages. Each greater alar cartilage is situated below the corresponding lat­eral cartilage. The lateral crus (its main body) lies in the ala, and the medial crus lies against the lower edge of the septal cartilage, which sepa­rates it from its contralateral fellow. Three or four lesser alar cartilages intervene between the lat­eral crus and the maxilla.
The septal cartilage forms the greater part of the nasal septum. It is situated slightly to one or other side of the midline, most frequently to the left (Wyburn 1972). Its anterosuperior border is attached to the back of the internasal suture and the anterior margins of the lateral nasal carti­lages. The anteroinferior border lies between the medial crura of the greater alar cartilages. The posterosuperior border is joined to the perpen­dicular plate of the ethmoid, and the posteroinfe­rior border is attached to the vomer and the anterior nasal spine.
The external nose has an abundant vascular supply, and therefore post-injury ischemic aps have a great possibility to survive. The arteries are branches of the facial artery and the ophthal­mic artery. The veins drain to the facial vein and also communicate with the ophthalmic veins.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 C. A. Ioannidis, Soft Tissue Injuries of the Head and Neck,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14915-3_6
53
54
e
Septal cartilage
Fig. 6.1 Schematic representation of the bony and cartilaginous skeleton of the nose
6 Injuries oftheNose
Lateral n. cartilage
Greater alar cartilag
Lesser alar cartilage
Fig. 6.2 Schematic representation of the nasal septum
6.2 Diagnosis ofNasal Trauma
Once life-threatening injuries, when present, are stabilized, a careful history and physical exami­nation should be completed and treatment indi­vidualized. The ultimate objective of treatment is to achieve both a functional and a cosmetic resto­ration with timely diagnosis and repair. The his­tory of a patient with nasal trauma is important for the management. The mechanism of injury, time of injury, patient age, and presence of preex­isting nasal deformities are essential factors.
Fig. 6.3 Nasal laceration of the right side and nasal deformity. The strong clinical suspicion of a nasal fracture needs to be conrmed radiologically
The type and extent of injury depend on the mechanism, the vector, and the magnitude of force. The time of injury in relation to the time of initial examination and treatment is a further fac­tor to consider. Within the rst few hours post­injury, before substantial swelling, more accurate evaluation is possible and surgical treatment is easier. The age of the patient (child, adult) is important, among others, for the type of anesthe­sia to be used for treatment (local, sedation). It is also important to obtain a medical history regard­ing previous nasal trauma and deformities.
External physical examination assesses the location and extent of soft-tissue injury as well as the possible loss of soft tissue. If there is suspicion of a nasal fracture (Fig.6.3), radiographic imaging
6.3 Septal Hematoma
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
55
is indicated. Internal physical examination is facil­itated by a headlight, nasal speculum, suction, and, occasionally, a exed endoscope. Cleaning of the nasal cavity (careful removal of blood clots, suc­tioning out any blood) allows better inspection. Occasionally, a local anesthetic with vasoconstric­tive effects (e.g., 2% xylocaine with adrenalin 1:200,000) should be used to control the bleeding and facilitate examination. Special attention is paid to the nasal septum and the possible presence of a hematoma. Mucosal tears and their extent are noted. The nasal endoscope better visualizes the posterior part of the septum and nasal cavity.
After completion of the examination, an indi­vidualized treatment plan is set up. Immediate repair is ideal and, when medically possible, should be carried out in order to decrease long­term sequelae.
6.3 Septal Hematoma
A nasal septal hematoma (Fig.6.4) may occur in 1% of nasal trauma cases (Leopard etal. 2012). This blood collection in the potential space between the nasal septal cartilage and its overly­ing mucoperichondrium occurs as a consequence of shearing forces and small-vessel rupture. The nasal cartilage depends on its surrounding peri­chondrium and supporting tissue for its meta­bolic needs. An untreated septal hematoma physically separates the cartilage from its peri­chondrium and thus deprives the former from its nutrients. This results in rapid destruction of the septal cartilage, often within 24 h, which may
further result in septal perforation and/or an unsightly saddle nose deformity (Canty and Berkowitz 1996; Zielnik-Jurkiewicz etal. 2008).
Furthermore, infection of the hematoma usu­ally results in an abscess, which may either spread or cause local cartilage destruction. Other complications of a nasal septal abscess are rare. They include meningitis, orbital cellulitis, cav­ernous sinus infection, and thrombosis and osteo­myelitis of the cranial bones (Wallenborn and Fitz-Hugh 1963).
Nasal obstruction is the most common symp­tom. Pain, rhinorrhea, and fever (in cases of an infection) occur in half of the patients (Canty and Berkowitz 1996).
Successful management of hematoma (or abscess) depends on immediate incision and drainage, as well as appropriate antibiotic ther­apy. Unfortunately, quite often, patients, espe­cially children, present several days after the episode of trauma (Kryger and Dommerby 1987; Canty and Berkowitz 1996).
The hematoma should be drained at its most dependent point by a horizontal incision across the swollen area, as low as possible in the sep­tum, so that subsequent loculation of pus is pre­vented (Shapiro 1978). Bilateral drainage is occasionally necessary, if the hematoma has not resulted in cartilage destruction. Any loose pieces of cartilage should be removed. A drain is placed followed by intranasal packing, which replaces the mucoperichondrium against the cartilage. Broad-spectrum antibiotics, covering among oth­ers staphylococci, should be started parenterally, and the regimen is adjusted according to the cul­ture results. Kryger and Dommerby (1987) reviewed 27 patients (of a total of 52 surgically treated patients) with a septal hematoma and 12 patients with a septal abscess, all resulting after trauma. The average delay of treatment was 48h for patients with a hematoma and 11 days for patients with abscesses. Incision, drainage, and nasal packing under general anesthesia were per­formed in all patients. Eight patients (20%) showed cartilage resorption. Further follow-up showed that seven patients (17%) had received further surgical treatment during the observation period (mean 44months).Fig. 6.4 A nasal septal hematoma of the right side