Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4581_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
3.7 Penetrating Injuries
Fig. 3.24 Penetrating injury to the eye (globe)
Fig. 3.25 Penetrating injury to the neck
fencing, or tree branches), as well as a variety of non-projectile high-velocity projectiles, frag­mentations from improvised explosive devices (IGD), and shrapnel (Meer et al. 2010; Maier etal. 2011; Aremu etal. 2012). The approach to treatment should be multidisciplinary, beginning with the trauma unit to provide airway mainte­nance and hemodynamic stabilization. An inter­ventional radiologist may be consulted for angiography. Penetrating facial trauma warrants radiological assessment of key adjacent anatomi­cal structures. In-driven fragments of native bone potentiate tissue damage in projectile penetrating facial trauma. Multi-detector computed tomogra­phy angiography (MDCTA) is the rst-line imag­ing modality in penetrating trauma of the neck
25
and often of the face (Ofah and Hall 2012). MDCTA can provide accurate assessment of vis­ceral injury of the neck, as well as vascular injury. The imaging modality of choice in facial pene­trating injuries remains non-contrast CT of the facial bones and brain (Ofah and Hall 2012). Organic material such as impaled wood frag­ments can be somewhat elusive on CT assess­ment unless appropriate window settings are employed, depending on the amount of air and uid within the interstices of the wood (Peterson etal. 2002). Impaled wood fragments may appear as “air” on CT and MRI assessment, but the radi­ologist should be alert on the possibility of an embedded fragment of wood if this “air” exhibits a geometrical margin (Ofah and Hall 2012). Penetrating injuries of the neck and face repre­sent a signicant source of acute admission of civilians to accident and emergency departments and trauma units in the United Kingdom. This trend is reected across the rest of Europe (Ofah and Hall 2012). It seems, however, that in South Africa these injuries are even more common than the rest of the world (Meer etal. 2010). In the United Kingdom, the number of actual and griev­ous bodily harm offences involving a knife or sharp instrument has remained more or less con­stant between 2009 and 2010, accounting for 4% of violent and sexual offences recorded by the police (Ofah and Hall 2012).
The ability of penetrating objects to cause local supercial soft-tissue damage such as parotid parenchymal or parotid duct injury should be considered. Emergency parotidectomy for vascular exposure in a case of penetrating trauma to the face and upper zone III of the neck has been reported. Facial nerve repair was also neces­sary, underscoring the importance of this approach not only for successful vascular control but also for preservation of nearby vital struc­tures (Morris et al. 2007). Damaged external carotid artery branches can be a source of cata­strophic hemorrhage, which may warrant emer­gency endovascular treatment. MDCTA may be of signicant value in such circumstances. Injury to venous structures should not be ignored; venous injuries occur in nearly 20% of patients with penetrating trauma of the neck and are fre-
26
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
3 General Principles ofWound Management
quently missed at physical examination (Gonzalez etal. 2003).
Globe laceration, globe perforation, globe rupture, or open globe injuries are forms of ocu­lar trauma that require urgent diagnosis and treat­ment. The integrity of the globe can be disrupted by two primary mechanisms: penetration/perfo­ration/laceration and rupture due to blunt force (Blair et al. 2022). Primarily blunt injuries are more common (83%), whereas primarily sharp/ penetrating injuries are less common (17%) (Kruse et al. 2021). In penetrating injuries, the object does not traverse the entire eye, whereas in perforating injuries, there is an entrance and an exit. Diagnosis of globe rupture is based on the history and clinical ophthalmologic examination typically consisting of the slit lamp and fundu­scopic evaluation (Blair etal. 2022). In cases of penetrating eye injuries, ultrasound of the eye is a quick, reliable, accurate, and easy-to-learn method, which offers valuable information regarding the anterior as well as the posterior compartments of the eye (Gay et al. 2013). Penetrating eye injuries were the second most common in a series of 147 patients with assault­related open globe injuries. Eyes that sustained penetrating injuries were less likely to have nal visual acuity of no light perception or require enucleation (Banza et al. 2013). A recent study from 13 hospitals (seven countries) using the International Globe and Adnexal Trauma Epidemiology Study platform showed that female gender, older age, zone III injury, eyelid injury, and intraocular foreign body were associ­ated with higher risk of severe vision loss (Hoskin etal. 2021). In another study, the authors observed that the presence of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD), injury at zone III, and rupture as the mechanism of injury were signicant risk fac­tors of no vision in cases of an open globe injury (Ji etal. 2017). Roughly one-third (34.5%) of all cases (51/148) ended up by enucleation (14 pri­mary and 37 secondary enucleations). All the enucleated eyes presented no light perception before operation (Ji etal. 2017). Indications for secondary enucleation were obvious eye atrophy, ocular pain, and prophylaxis of sympathetic oph­thalmia (Ji etal. 2017). Nearly 40% of cases with
ruptured globe were anatomically restored through vitreoretinal surgery. The closed-funnel retinal detachment or extensive retinal loss, pro­liferative vitreoretinopathy, intraocular foreign body, eyelid injury, and choroidal damage were correlated with poor outcomes (Feng etal. 2015; Hoskin etal. 2021). In children, presenting visual acuity and retinal detachment were independent predictors of outcome. When visual acuity was unknown, age at injury, lens involvement, and retinal detachment were independently associ­ated with nal visual acuity (Jacobson et al.
2020).
Meer et al. (2010) in a retrospective, cross-
sectional, and record-based study analyzed all penetrating knife injuries reported at various South African hospitals for a period of 11years. Twenty-four cases of such injuries with the knife in situ were analyzed. Twenty-one patients (87.5%) were male and three (12.5%) were female. Thirteen (54.2%) were colored and 11 (45.8%) were black. There were no denite signs of vascular injury. Postsurgical recovery of all patients was rapid and uneventful, and there were no fatalities. The authors suggested that an angio­gram is mandatory, if the patient presents with excessive bleeding or an expanding hematoma or if the knife blade is in the region of any large ves­sels (Meer etal. 2010). More details, as well as more recent views on this subject, are presented in Chap. 10.
3.8 Gunshot Injuries
Head and neck gunshot injuries pose a unique challenge to the extent of injury and resulting soft-tissue and osseous loss (Volk et al. 2019). Important differences between military (com­monly induced by high-velocity weapons) and civilian gunshot wounds (GSW) in the maxillofa­cial region were established in a cross-sectional study from the University of Florida. A signi­cant difference was measured between study groups regarding the region of the face involved, gender, and race. No signicant relationship was measured regarding deaths during admission (p = 0.6510) for either study group (Guevara
References
27
etal. 2016). GSW represent a major public health dilemma in the United States (Volk etal. 2019); however, even in countries like Sweden, an increase of patients with GSW has been reported in the largest nationwide epidemiological study (92 for the time interval 2013–2015, 141 for 2016–2018) (Günther etal. 2021). The mortality rate is much higher (ca 50%) compared to the mortality rate for stab wounds (9–21%) (Günther etal. 2021; Magyar etal. 2022).
Initial management should use advanced trauma life support principles with the goal of patient stabilization (Volk et al. 2019). Injuries with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 14–15 were likely to have little or no associated brain injury, and the wounds were localized to the face. However, in cases of brain trauma, the mortality was signicantly higher (Quenzer et al. 2021). Acute operative management of these low­velocity injuries should focus on wound decon­tamination, debridement, and temporary wound closure (Kassan et al. 2000; Volk et al. 2019). Historically, denitive surgical management focused on delayed reconstruction secondary to high rates of wound infections, necrosis, and isch­emia (Volk etal. 2019). Contemporary methods, however, have shifted towards earlier more deni­tive reconstruction due to improved imaging, advent of virtual surgical planning, and popular­ization of microvascular free aps. Early primary reconstruction can be successful for patients with facial gunshot wounds, particularly when the entry point of the bullet is in the upper and mid­face area. Delayed primary reconstruction is more common when the bullet enters the lower face (Murphy et al. 2018). Unintentionally, delayed treatment was observed to result in improved healing and decreased postoperative complica­tions and morbidity of high-velocity maxillofacial injuries possibly due to a critical revascularization period (Oren etal. 2021). Postoperative complica­tions were signicantly higher in patients with self-inicted injuries compared to patients with non-self-inicted injuries in a series of 73 free ap reconstructions of signicant facial defects from ballistic missiles (Sokoya etal. 2019). The result of this study is likely to be helpful in surgi­cal planning and patient counseling.
Face transplantation has the potential to offer an alternative solution to the shortcomings of conventional reconstruction. However, the criti­cal nature of the psychosocial component in cases of facial self-inicted gunshot wounds should be stressed given the history of mental ill­ness and suicidal behavior in this subset of patients (Kiwanuka etal. 2016).
Penetrating gunshot injuries to supra-aortic arteries that cause life-threatening blood loss or major neurologic decits are increasingly man­aged using modern endovascular treatment (EVT). Yevich etal. (2014) reviewed ten patients (seven men, age 17–50 years) who underwent emergency EVT for acute gunshot injuries to supra-aortic arteries requiring acute manage­ment. Eight penetrated external carotid artery branches were occluded with liquid embolic agents (acrylic glue or Onyx) or particles. All except one patient survived with minor or no residual decits. Understanding endovascular techniques and being able to make rapid and appropriate treatment decisions in the setting of acute gunshot injuries to the face and neck can be a lifesaving measure and greatly benets the patient’s outcome (Yevich etal. 2014).
References
Agrawal A, Raibagkar SC, Vora HJ. Friction burns: epi-
demiology and prevention. Ann Burns Fire Disast.
2008;21:3–6. Akyürek M, Safak T, Keçik A.Microsurgical ear replanta-
tion without venous repair: failure of development of
venous channels despite patency of arterial anastomo-
sis for 14 days. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46(439):42. Aremu SK, Makusid MM, Ibe IC.Oro-cranial penetrating
pencil injury. Ann Saudi Med. 2012;32:534–6. Banza AM, Emami P, Soni N, etal. A 10-year review of
assault-related open-globe injuries at an urban hospital.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:653–9. Blair K, Alhadi SA, Czyz CN. Globe rupture. In:
StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing;
2022.
Borges AF. Elective incisions and scar revision. Boston,
MA: Little-Brown; 1973. Bush J, Ferguson MW, Mason T, etal. The dynamic rota-
tion of Langer’s lines on facial expression. J Plast
Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:393–9. Castana O, Dagdelenis J, Rempelos G, et al. Traumatic
injuries with deep abrasion: “A burn”. Ann Burn Fire
Disast. 2009;22:44–7.
28
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
3 General Principles ofWound Management
Cole P, Hammoudeh J, Habal M, etal. Pediatric soft tissue
injuries of the head and neck. In: Bentz M, Baurer B, Zuker R, editors. Pediatric plastic surgery. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medial Publishing; 2008. p.216.
Coltro PS, Goldenberg DC, Aldunate JL, et al. Facial
palsy after blunt trauma and without facial bone frac­ture. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1162–4.
Feng K, Wang CG, Hu YT, etal. Clinical features and
prognosis of eyeball rupture: eye injury vitrectomy study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;43:629–36.
Frodel JL Jr, Barth P, Wagner J.Salvage of partial soft
tissue avulsions with medicinal leeches. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131:934–9.
Gay DA, Ritchie JV, Perry JN, etal. Ultrasound of pen-
etrating ocular injury in a combat environment. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:82–4.
Gonzalez RP, Falimirski M, Holevar MR, etal. Penetrating
zone II neck injury: does dynamic computed tomo­graphic scan contribute to the diagnostic sensitivity of physical examination for surgically signicant injury? A prospective blind study. J Trauma. 2003;54:61–4.
Guevara C, Pirgousis P, Steinberg B.Maxillofacial gun-
shot injuries: a comparison of civilian and military data. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:795.e1–7.
Günther M, Dahlberg M, Rostami A, et al. Incidence,
demographics, and outcomes of penetrating trauma in Sweden during the past decade. Front Neurol. 2021;12:730405.
Hendrick RG Jr, Tiwari P. Successful replantation of
upper lip avulsion injury using an arterialized venous anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:628e–9e.
Herrera F, Buntic R, Brooks D, et al. Microvascular
approach to scalp replantation and reconstruc­tion: a thirty-six-year experience. Microsurgery. 2012;32:591–7.
Hoskin AK, Low R, Sen P, et al. Epidemiology and
outcomes of open globe injuries: the international globe and adnexal trauma epidemiology study (IGATES). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259:3485–99.
Huang YC, Huang JJ, Hsu CC.Emergency management
of total scalp avulsion. Emerg Med J. 2009;26:225–6.
Ihrai T, Balaguer T, Monteil MC, etal. [Surgical manage-
ment of traumatic ear amputations: literature review]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2009;54:146–51.
Ioannides C. Reconstruction of eyelid defects. In:
Ioannides C, editor. Carcinomas of the skin and adnexae of the head and neck. Athens: Parisianou Medical Publications; 2003. p.169–81.
Ioannides C, Treffers W, Ruten M, etal. Ocular injuries
associated with fractures involving the orbit. J Cranio­Max Fac Surg. 1988;16:157–9.
Ioannides Ch, Freihofer HP, Vriens J. Fractures of the
frontal sinus: a rationale of treatment. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46:208–14.
Jacobson A, Liles N, Besirli CG, etal. Predictors of visual
outcomes in pediatric open globe injuries. J AAPOS. 2020;24:360.e1–8.
Ji YR, Zhu DQ, Zhou HF, etal. Epidemiologic character-
istics and outcomes of open globe injury in Shanghai. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10:1295–300.
Juncar RJ, Tent PA, Juncar M, etal. Interrelation between
facial soft tissue lesions, underlying fracture patterns
and treatment of zygomatic bone trauma: a 10 year ret-
rospective study. Head Face Med. 2020;16:30. Kassan AH, Lalloo R, Kariem G.A retrospective analysis
of gunshot injuries to the maxilla-facial region. SADJ.
2000;55:359–63. Kind GM. Microvascular ear replantation. Clin Plast
Surg. 2002;29:233–48. Kiwanuka H, Aycart MA, Gitlin DF, etal. The role of face
transplantation in the self-inicted gunshot wound. J
Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:1636–47. Kruse C, Bruce JL, Bekker W, et al. The manage-
ment of ocular and peri-ocular trauma needs to
be coordinated according to ATLS principles and
requires multi- disciplinary collaboration. Injury.
2021;52:2606–10. Langer K. Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Haut. I.
Ueber die Spaltbarkeit der Cutis. Sitzungsbericht der
Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Classe der
Wiener Kaiserlichen Academie der Wissenschaften.
1861;44:19. Lin PY, Chiang YC, Hsieh CH, et al. Microsurgical
replantation and salvage procedures in traumatic ear
amputation. J Trauma. 2010;69:E15–9. Magyar CT, Bednarski P, Jakob DA, etal. Severe pen-
etrating trauma in Switzerland: rst analysis of
the Swiss Trauma Registry (STR). Eur J Trauma
Emerg Surg. 2022;45:3837. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00068- 021- 01822.
Maier H, Tisch M, Lorenz KJ, etal. [Penetrating injuries
in the face and neck region. Diagnosis and treatment].
HNO. 2011;59:765–82. McGregor IA.Fundamental techniques of plastic surgery.
Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1989. p.6. Meer M, Siddiqi A, Morkel JA, etal. Knife inicted pen-
etrating injuries of the maxillofacial region: a descrip-
tive record based study. Injury. 2010;41:77–81. Mohamed A, Mulcaire J, Clover AJ.Head and neck injury
in major trauma in Ireland: a multicenter retrospective
analysis of patterns and surgical workload. Ir J Med
Sci. 2021;190:395–401. Morris LG, Miglietta MA, Sikora AG, etal. Emergency
parotidectomy for penetrating zone III neck trauma.
Arch Surg. 2007;142:1206–8. Murphy JA, McWilliams SR, Lee M, etal. Management
of self-inicted gunshot wounds to the face: retrospec-
tive review from a single tertiary care trauma centre.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56:173–6. Nguyen HH. The microsurgical replantation of seven
complete scalp avulsions: is one artery sufcient? J
Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:1639–44. Ofah C, Hall E.Imaging assessment of penetrating injury
of the neck and face. Insights Imag. 2012;3:419–31. Oren D, Dror AA, Zoabi A, etal. The impact of delayed
surgical intervention following high velocity maxillo-
facial injuries. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1379. Otto A, Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, etal. [Successful
ear replantation without venous anastomosis by
using leeches]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir.
1999;31:98–101.
References
29
Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW, Kransdorf MJ. Wooden for-
eign bodies: imaging appearance. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:557–62.
Place MJ, Herber SC, Hardests RA.Basic techniques and
principles in plastic surgery. In: Grabb and Smith’s plastic surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven;
1997. p.14.
Quenzer F, Givner A, Dirks R, etal. Self-inicted gunshot
wounds: a retrospective, observational study of U.S. trauma centers. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22:518–24.
Rhee ST, Colville C, Buchman SR.Conservative manage-
ment of large avulsions of the lip and local landmarks. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004;20:40–2.
Sabet SJ, Tarbet KJ, Lemke BN, et al. Subperiosteal
hematoma of the orbit with osteoneogenesis. Arch Opthalmol. 2001;119:301–3.
Sanger JR, Loqiudice JA, Rowe D, et al. Ectopic scalp
replantation: a case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:e23–7.
Sokoya M, Vincent AG, Joshi R, et al. Higher compli-
cation rates in self-inicted gunshot wounds after microvascular free tissue transfer. Laryngoscope. 2019;129:837–40.
Soueid NE, Khoobehi K, Lee MR.Microsurgical replan-
tation of total upper eyelid avulsion. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:99–102.
Tipler P. Physics for scientists and engineers. 4th ed.
New York, NY: W.H. Freeman/Worth Publishers;
1998.
Trogues R, Danan D. Replantation of a free lip shred
following a human bite (Letter). Nouv Press Med.
1981;10:2831–2. Volk AS, Shokri T, Sokoya M, et al. Facial gunshot
wounds. Facial Plast Surg. 2019;35:578–83. Walton R, Beahm EK, Brown R, et al. Microsurgical
replantation of the lip: a multi-institutional experi-
ence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:358–68. Yeatts RP, Hoopes PC Jr, Saunders SS.Eyelid replanta-
tion eight months after traumatic avulsion. Ophthal
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20:390–2. Yevich SM, Lee SR, Scott BG, etal. Emergency endo-
vascular management of penetrating gunshot inju-
ries to the arteries of the face and neck: a case series
and review of the literature. J Neurointerv Surg.
2014;6:42–6. Yin JVV, Matsuo JM, Hsieh CH, et al. Replantation
of total avulsed scalp with microsurgery: experi-
ence of eight cases and literature review. J Trauma.
2008;64:796–802.
Injuries oftheScalp, Forehead,
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
andEyebrow
4
4.1 Anatomy oftheScalp, Forehead, andEyebrow
The scalp is of particular surgical interest because it covers the skull, it presents numerous skin lesions, and its lacerations are the most common type of head injury requiring surgical care (Anson and McVay 1971).
The soft parts over the skull consist of ve layers: the skin, the subcutaneous tissue, the occipitofrontalis muscle and its galeal aponeuro­sis, a lax layer of connective tissue, and the outer periosteum of the skull bone (Fig.4.1).
The skin of the scalp is thick, and it is attached by tough brous septa to the underlying frontalis muscle. It has an abundant arterial and lymphatic supply; the arteries are derived from the vessels in the subcutaneous tissue. Because of this abun­dant arterial supply, scalp and forehead lacera­tions heal well.
The subcutaneous tissue is dense and tough because of the presence of numerous short brous septa, which also enclose small fat lobules and form an inelastic layer carrying the blood vessels (Anson and McVay 1971). The latter are numerous and amply anastomotic. The abundant blood sup­ply leads to, occasional, considerable hemorrhage. Simple compression of the skin adjacent to a wound between the ngertips and the underlying skull will, however, control even an alarming hem­orrhage. The occipitofrontalis muscle is attached posteriorly to the occipital protuberance and to the
superior nuchal line (occipital bone). The frontal bellies of the epicranius (occipitofrontalis) muscle extend forward from the galea to the region of the eyebrow, where they become attached to the skin, interlacing with the orbicularis oculi. The frontal bellies blend with each other in the midline, and some bers pass down over the nose to become continuous with the procerus muscle (Sinclair
1972), which arises from the lower part of the
nasal bones; another small muscle, the corrugator supercilii, arises from the medial end of the super­ciliary arch blending with the orbicularis oculi and passes upwards and laterally to be inserted into the skin of the eyebrow (Sinclair 1972).
The lateral arterial supply of the scalp is derived from the supercial temporal artery, posterior auricular artery, and occipital branches of the external carotid artery (Anson and McVay 1971) (Fig. 4.2). Furthermore, frontal and supraorbital/ supraciliary branches of the ophthalmic artery contribute to the vascularization of the forehead (Fig.4.2). All the vessels run in the subcutaneous fat from the periphery towards the vertex and anas­tomose across the midline with one another (Anson and McVay 1971). The frontal, parietal, and occipital veins empty into the external jugular vein. The frontal and supraorbital veins unite at the median angle of the eye and communicate there with the angular vein (the beginning of the facial vein). The supraorbital veins drain into the oph­thalmic vein and thence into the cavernous sinus (Anson and McVay 1971).
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 C. A. Ioannidis, Soft Tissue Injuries of the Head and Neck,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14915-3_4
31
32
e
Gale
auric. artery
temp. artery
4 Injuries oftheScalp, Forehead, andEyebrow
1 Skin
2 Subcutaneous tissue
a
4 Subaponeurotic connective tissu
Bone
Fig. 4.1 Schematic representation of the scalp layers (skin=1; subcutaneous tissue =2; subaponeurotic connective tissue=4)
Fig. 4.2 Schematic representation of the vascularization of the scalp
Pericranium
Dura Matter
The nerves of the scalp, with the exception of the facial supply to the frontalis muscle, are purely sensory.
The frontal bellies of the frontalis muscle are supplied by the frontal branch of the facial nerve. The sensory innervation is provided by the fron­tal nerve, branch of the ophthalmic nerve (rst branch of the trigeminal nerve). The frontal nerve divides into a larger supraorbital and a smaller
Post.
Sup.
supratrochlear branch. The supraorbital nerve passes through the supraorbital groove or fora­men and, turning upwards, supplies the forehead and scalp as far as the vertex. The supratrochlear nerve supplies the medial parts of the upper eyelid and forehead (Sinclair 1972). The great auricular and the major and lesser occipital nerves are of spinal origin. They innervate the side and back of the scalp.
4.2 Scalp Injuries
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
33
4.2 Scalp Injuries
Scalp lacerations are the most common type of head injury requiring surgical care (Anson and McVay 1971). Studies on animal bite injuries of the head and neck also showed that scalp lacera­tions were the most common injuries (>50%) (Mitchell etal. 2003; Patil etal. 2015).
The abundant blood supply of the scalp may lead to alarming hemorrhage in patients with scalp lacerations (Fig. 4.3). Such patients often have associated injuries that redirect the clini­cian’s attention to other injury sites. Some scalp lacerations are severe enough to cause hypovole­mic shock and acute anemia (Lemos and Clark
1988; Turnage and Maull 2000). If the patient
arrives in shock, the perfusion pressure may be low; therefore, the active scalp bleeding may be minimal. Under such circumstances, the scalp wound may be initially neglected and attention turned to assuring an adequate airway, establish­ing intravenous lines, initiating volume resuscita­tion, and searching for more occult sources of blood loss (Turnage and Maull 2000). However, as the blood pressure returns towards normal val­ues, bleeding from the scalp wound becomes more profuse and may present a hemostatic chal­lenge to the clinician. Hemostatic forceps (Fig.4.3) and vessel ligature or Raney clips to the
Fig. 4.3 Scalp laceration; the hemorrhage was controlled using a mosquito artery forceps on a scalp vein
edges of the scalp lacerations when readily avail­able can control scalp hemorrhage (Lemos and Clark 1988; Turnage and Maull 2000). Following stabilization and radiologic studies, the scalp wounds can be managed denitely (Sykes and Cowgill 1989).
Continued reduction in hemoglobin levels calls for a more thorough examination of the scalp. Adequate examination of lacerations requires thorough cleaning, as coagulated blood and other material may obscure ndings. This is particularly important in scalp lacerations where the overlying hair can form a barrier which hides the wound edges (Basyuni etal. 2016).
Animal and human studies suggest that irriga­tion lowers the infection rate in contaminated wounds (Howell etal. 1993; Owens and Wenke
2007). Irrigation of “clean” lacerations, however,
did not seem to signicantly alter the rate of infection or the cosmetic appearance of clean, non-contaminated scalp lacerations (Hollander et al. 1998). The authors compared two similar groups (irrigation–non-irrigation) and found that the incidence of wound infection was not signi­cantly different between the two groups (0.9% vs. 1.4%, respectively; p=0.28), and the percent­age of patients with an optimal cosmetic appear­ance was similar in the two groups (75.9% vs.
81.7%, respectively; p= 0.07) (Hollander etal.
1998).
Concern exists among various surgeons that not removing skin hair prior to scalp laceration repair may lead to an increased incidence of wound infections. Howell and Morgan (1988) studied a group of 68 patients with scalp lacera­tions, which were repaired without hair removal. The mean patient age was 21.8±19.8years, and the mean laceration length was 2.5 ± 2.0 cm. Sixty-three lacerations were repaired within 3h of injury. The authors examined the patients pro­spectively for infection. No infections were noted at 5-day follow-up. Because hair removal neither contributes benets to the surgical outcome nor decreases the risk of wound infection, but has considerable cosmetic value for the patient, most surgeons recommend that scalp lacerations should be repaired without hair shaving, when­ever this is technically feasible.
34
4 Injuries oftheScalp, Forehead, andEyebrow
The necessity of temporary suturing of scalp lacerations in patients with compound depressed skull fractures who need further denitive treat­ment has been an issue. Shokunbi et al. (2000) reported that scalp closure without elevation of the depressed fracture does not reduce the risk of infection in patients with compound depressed skull fractures. The authors based their conclu­sion on the results of a retrospective observa­tional study of 79 patients who were treated surgically at their unit. The rate of infection in patients who presented with open wounds (n=52) and those whose scalps had been sutured prior to presentation (n=27) was similar without signicant difference (X2 = 1.92, p > 0.05). Suturing the scalp laceration alone prior to refer­ral for denitive surgery did not reduce the rate of infection of the cranial wound; therefore, the authors recommended hemostasis, thorough irri­gation of the scalp wound, and application of sterile dressings prior to transfer for denitive management in patients who do not have imme­diate access to neurosurgical care (Shokunbi etal. 2000).
If there are no underlying fractures, denitive management of the laceration should be con­ducted. Suturing of the scalp wound with nonab­sorbable sutures under local anesthesia is the simplest method. The sutures should equally involve all layers of the scalp, in order to achieve a better coaptation of the wound edges. A pres­sure head dressing, or occasionally a vacuum drain in cases of wide undermining, should be applied for 24 h for prevention of hematomas. The sutures are left in place for 10–12 days. Stapling is an alternative to suturing for simple lacerations and has a number of advantages with no additional complications. Kanegaye et al. (1997) compared the total costs and the physician time requirements for suture and staple repair of pediatric scalp lacerations. Stapling resulted in shorter wound closure times and was less expen­sive in terms of equipment and total cost (equip­ment+physician time). There were no cosmetic or infectious complications in either group. A more recent prospective, randomized trial by Khan et al. (2002) from the Babies Hospital, Columbia University, of 42 children (aged
1–16years) with simple scalp lacerations reached the same conclusion that stapling is a fast and cosmetically acceptable alternative to suturing for simple scalp lacerations.
Another technique for treating scalp lacera­tions is the hair apposition technique (HAT). After standard cleaning procedures, hair on both sides of a laceration is apposed with a single twist. This is then held with tissue adhesives. In a compara­tive (randomized controlled) study of HAT vs. suturing, wound healing trended towards being judged more satisfactory in the HAT group (Hock et al. 2002). Patients who underwent HAT had less scarring (6.3% vs. 20.4%; p= 0.005), fewer overall complications, signicantly lower pain scores (median 2 vs. 4; p < 0.001), and shorter procedure times (median 5 min vs. 15 min; p<0.001). There was a trend towards less wound breakdown in the HAT group. Severely contami­nated wounds, actively bleeding wounds, patients with hair stand length less than 3cm, and hemo­dynamically unstable patients were excluded from the study. Because of the advantages, the authors stated that HAT has become their tech­nique of choice for suitable scalp lacerations (Hock etal. 2002). In a further randomized, pro­spective trial, the same group from Singapore General Hospital showed that the HAT can be safely performed by trained nurses with equiva­lent outcomes as doctors (Ong etal. 2008).
Scalp wounds with exposed calvarial bones continue to be a challenge especially when no local ap options are available and no microvas­cular surgery can be performed. Clinical and experimental evidence has shown that such wounds can effectively be treated with negative­pressure wound therapy. In a recent review of 19 patients (scalp wounds 6×4cm to 17 ×11cm, exposed bone 1×2cm to 10×10cm), Zargar etal. (2022) observed healthy seven granulation tissue covers after treatment with customized negative-pressure wound treatment. All wounds were then skin grafted. No major complications were seen, and all wounds healed rapidly. Combination of negative-pressure wound therapy and platelet-rich brin was shown to be even more effective than negative pressure alone (Zhang etal. 2022).
4.2 Scalp Injuries
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
35
Hypertrophic scarring after scalp laceration repair is a very rare phenomenon. It is possible that the rich subcutaneous blood ow in the scalp, which is connected to bushy hair, prevents hyper­trophic scar and keloid formation. Anecdotal cases have been reported in hairless parts of the scalp, which were successfully treated with re­excision of the hypertrophic scar, irradiation by a linear accelerator, and pressure treatment for 6months (Murakami etal. 2006).
Total avulsion of the scalp is a rare but poten­tially devastating injury. It commonly results from the entrapment of long hair in high-speed rotary parts of industrial machinery, or less fre­quently from animal bites and assaults (Yin etal.
2008; Patil etal. 2015). The avulsed scalp may
include the eyebrows as well as all or part of the ears, whereas the plain of cleavage is generally through the loose connective tissue between the galea aponeurotica and the periosteum. Microsurgical scalp replantation has been the method of choice for treating these injuries for the past four decades (since 1976 when Miller etal. described the rst case). Once the scalp has been cleaned of hair, the next step is identica­tion and preparation of the vessels for reanasto­mosis. Available branches of the temporal artery and temporal veins are dissected proximally in the patient and distally in the ap and mobilized to gain as much length as possible for the reanas­tomosis. Under microscopic magnication, the arteries and veins are reanastomosed using 9.0 or
10.0 nylon microsutures. The avulsed temporal branch of the facial nerve should also be identi­ed and reanastomosed. This is not always fea­sible due to the local edema and trauma (Plant and Fialkov 2010). The scalp is then aligned into its anatomical position, and the frontalis muscle, if torn, is sutured with 4.0 Vicryl absorbable sutures. The skin closure is then completed cir­cumferentially. Because there is often severe trauma to the vessels within the zone of injury, many authors have recommended the use of interposed vein grafts. Doubling the number of anastomoses that can leak, clot, or fail during the postoperative period; creating a donor site; and increasing ischemia time are the disadvantages of using vein grafts. Adequate length, however, is
thus provided to ensure a tension-free anastomo­sis. If two surgical teams are available, the opera­tive time can be minimized. Because failure in these replants is mainly due to venous conges­tion, it is recommended to use a minimum of two veins. It should be noted, however, that single­vein anastomosis with excellent survival has also been reported (Plant and Fialkov 2010).
In cases in which the scalp is so traumatized that no viable arteries are available, the use of an arteriovenous anastomosis has been described (Morris and MacGill 1992).
Postoperative monitoring is required, because congestion and/or necrosis of portions of the scalp are not uncommon. The occiput is a com­mon location for postoperative necrosis (Arashiro etal. 1995; Plant and Fialkov 2010). This is prob- ably due to the small caliber of the occipital ves­sels and the difculty in nding them and using them in the anastomosis, and the gravitational dependence of the area (Plant and Fialkov 2010). If at least one occipital vein can be identied and reanastomosed, the aforementioned complication can be mitigated.
There is a wide variation in the literature regarding ischemia time. The time margins within which a scalp can survive have not been dened. Ischemia times of up to 17h (warm) and up to 24 h (cold) (Juri et al. 1990; Sirimaharaj and Boonpadhanapong 2001) have been reported with survival of the anastomosed scalp. However, the shorter the ischemia time, the bigger the chances of the scalp surviving. Cheng et al. (1996) have suggested that if warm ischemia time of the scalp is over 10h, the arteries should be anastomosed rst in order to establish blood supply to the avulsed scalp. Subsequently, when the venous anastomoses are performed, one should block blood ow in arteries intermittently in order to decrease the considerable blood loss.
Overall success rate reaches 95%. One hun­dred percent survival was reported in 80% of cases, partial survival in 15%, and total failures in 5% in a series of 20 patients from China (Cheng etal. 1996). In cases of failure after scalp replan­tation, multiple trephination of the calvarium has been suggested as an alternative treatment for scalp reconstruction (Terzioğlu et al. 1999;