Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4581_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
References
149
11.12 Long-Term Sequelae ofBurns
Burn injury is often a devastating event with long-term physical and psychosocial effects. Many burn victims are being tormented even decades after the event. Few studies have exam­ined the impacts of burn injuries on long-term health and function, life satisfaction, and com­munity integration beyond 5 years post-injury. Results on the above issues, 20years after burn injury, were recently reported by Abouzeid etal. (2022). These authors reviewed patient-reported outcome measures of 421 adult burn survivors 5, 10, 15, and 20years after injury. Lower Physical Component Summaries (PCS) scores (worse health) were associated with longer hospital stay, older age at injury, and greater time since injury. Similarly, lower Mental Component Summaries (MCS) scores were associated with long length of hospital stay, female sex, and greater time since injury. Female sex and pre-burn depression have already been identied as risk factors for lower MCS scores (Van Loey and Van Son 2003). Satisfaction with Life Scale scores was reported to decrease negatively over time (Abouzeid etal.
2022).
Not all burn patients show the same trajectory regarding psychologic problems and post­traumatic stress syndrome. Sveen etal. (2011), in a study of 95 adults with burns, identied four clusters: (1) resilient, with low levels of post­traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that decreased over time; (2) recovery, with high levels of symp­toms that gradually decreased; (3) delayed, with moderate symptoms that increased over time; and (4) chronic, with high levels of symptoms over time. Several risk factors were reported: life events, premorbid psychiatric morbidity, person­ality traits, avoidant coping, in-hospital psycho­logic symptoms, and social support. The resilient trajectory consistently had fewer of the risk fac­tors and differed most from the chronic trajectory (Sveen etal. 2011).
Patients with head and neck (H&N) burns are particularly affected regarding their social func­tioning, quality of life, physical health, and satis­faction with appearance. Sinha et al. (2019)
compared the above parameters in patients with H&N burns and patients with burns to other areas of the body. In the mixed model regression analy­ses, satisfaction with appearance and short form­12 mental component score were signicantly worse for adults with H&N burns compared to those with non-H&N burns (p<0.01). The same group compared the long-term outcomes of H&N burns vs. non-H&N burns in adolescents (14–
17.9 years of age). The H&N group had more extensive burns, had longer hospital stay, and showed signicantly worse satisfaction with appearance at 12months after injury (Wang etal.
2022). These results suggest that future research
should focus on improving strategies (recon­structive surgery, cognitive behavioral therapy, social skill training), which in turn will provide new means and improve satisfaction with appear­ance of adolescents as well as adult burn patients mitigating their long-term suffering.
References
Abdi S, Zhou Y. Management of pain after burn injury.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002;15:563–7.
Abouzeid CA, Wolfe AE, Ni P, etal. Are burns a chronic
condition? Examining patient reported outcomes up to 20 years after burn injury– a burn model system National Database Investigation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;92(6):1066–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/
TA.0000000000003547.
Adant JP, Bluth F, Jacquemin D.Reconstruction of neck
burns. A long-term comparative study between skin grafts, skin expansion and free aps. Acta Chir Belg. 1998;98:5–9.
Adouani K, Zitouni K, Yacoub K, etal. Les sequelles de
brûlures cervicofaciales: Classication anatomocli­nique et consequences therapeutiques. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 1997;10:166–70.
Akin S. Burned ear reconstruction using a prefabri-
cated free radial forearm ap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2001;17:233–6.
Al-Zacko SM, Al-Kazzaz DA. Initial release of severe
post-burn contracture scar of the neck for intuba­tion under ketamine. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2009;22:196–9.
American Burn Association. Hospital and prehospital
resources for optimal care of patients with burn injury: guidelines for development and operation of burn cen­ters. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1990;11:98–104.
American Burn Association. Advanced burn life sup-
port providers’ manual. Chicago, IL: American Burn Association; 2005.
150
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
11 Burns oftheScalp, Face, andNeck
American Burn Association. 2015. www.ameriburn.org/
resources_factsheet.php- AmericanBurnAssociation.
Accessed 19 Nov 2015. Antia NH.Organisation of plastic surgery in developing
countries. Br J Plast Surg. 1985;38:24–9. Ariani N, Visser A, van Oort RP, etal. Current state of cra-
niofacial prosthetic rehabilitation. Int J Prosthodont.
2013;26:57–67. Babar TF, Khan MT, Marwat MZ, etal. Patterns of ocular
trauma. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007;17:148–53. Barrera A. The use of micrografts and minigrafts for
the treatment of burn alopecia. Plast Reconstr Surg.
1999;103:581–9. Barret JP, Dziewulski P, Ramy PI, et al. Biobrane ver-
sus 1% silver sulfadiazine in second-degree pediatric
burns. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:62–5. Barrow RE, Jeschke MG, Herndon DN.Early release of
third-degree eyelid burns prevents eye injury. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:860–3. Benmeir P, Neuman A, Weinberg A, etal. Reconstruction
of a completely burned nose by a free dorsalis pedis
ap. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:570–1. Bernard SL.Reconstruction of the burned nose and ear.
Clin Plast Surg. 2000;27:97–112. Bharadia D, Sinha I, Pomabac B. Role of facial vascu-
larized composite allotransplantation in burn patients.
Clin Plast Surg. 2017;44:857–64. Bosse GM, Wadia SA, Padmanabhan P.Hot asphalt burns:
a review of injuries and management options. Am J
Emerg Med. 2014;32(820):e1–3. Boykin JV, Eriksson E, Pittman RN.In vivo microcircula-
tion of a scald burn and the progression of postburn
dermal ischemia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;66:191–8. Brigham PA, McLoughlin E. Burn incidence and medi-
cal care use in the United States: estimates, trends and
data sources. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996;17:95–107. Brusselaers N, Monstrey S, Vogelaers D, et al. Severe
burn injury in Europe: a systematic review of the inci-
dence, etiology, morbidity and mortality. Crit Care.
2010;14:R188. Buckley NA, Juurlink DN, Isbister G, etal. Hyperbaric
oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2011;2011:CD002041. Cai Z, Pan B, Jiang H, etal. Chondrogenesis of human
adipose-derived stem cells by in vivo co-graft with
auricular chondrocytes from microtia. Aesthet Plast
Surg. 2015;39:431–9. Caputo G, Monese C, Governa M, et al. Conservative
treatment in auricle burns. (Lett.). Ann Burns Fire
Disasters. 2005;18:217–8. Carr JA, Crowley N. Prophylactic sequential bronchos-
copy after inhalation injury: results from a three-year
prospective randomized trial. Eur J Trauma Emerg
Surg. 2013;39:177–83. Charles WN, Collins D, Mandalia S, et al. Impact of
inhalation injury on outcomes in critically ill burns
patients: 12-year experience at a regional burns centre.
Burns. 2021;S0305-4179(21):0037–5. Chen J, Qian Y, Wang D, et al. Expanded scarred or
skin-grafted forehead ap for nasal reconstruction
in severe postburn facial deformity. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:447–51.
Cherry GW, Austed GD, Pasyk KA, etal. Increased sur-
vival and vascularity of random pattern skin aps elevated in controlled, expanded skin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72:680–5.
Ching JA, Shah JL, Doran CJ, et al. The evaluation
of physical exam ndings in patients assessed for suspected burn inhalation injury. J Burn Care Res. 2015;36:197–202.
Ching JA, Ching YH, Shivers SC, et al. An analysis of
inhalation injury diagnostic methods and patient out­comes. J Burn Care Res. 2016;37:e27–32.
Choi YC, Kim JC. Single hair transplantation using
Choi hair transplanter. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;18:945–8.
Claassen K, Dos Anjos DR, Broding HC.Current status of
emergency treatment of chemical eye burns in work­places. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14:306–9.
Clayton NA, Ward EC, Maitz PK. Orofacial contracture
management outcomes following partial thickness facial burns. Burns. 2015a;41:1291–7.
Clayton NA, Ward EC, Maitz PK. Full thickness facial
burns: outcomes following orofacial rehabilitation. Burns. 2015b;41:1599–606.
Cronin T. The use of a molded splint to prevent con-
tracture after split-skin grafting on the neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1961;27:7–18.
D’ Souza AL, Nelson NG, McKenzie LB.Pediatric burn
injuries treated in US emergency departments between 1990 and 2006. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1424–30.
Daya M. Nostril stenosis corrected by release and
serial stenting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:1012–9.
Donelan MB. Reconstruction of the head and neck. In:
Herndon DN, editor. Total burn care. Edinburgh: Saunders–Elsevier; 2007. p.701–18.
Dougherty ME, Warden GD. A thirty-year review of
oral appliances used to manage microstomia, 1972 to
2002. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003;24:418–31.
Dries DJ, Endorf FW. Inhalation injury: epidemiol-
ogy pathology, treatment strategies. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21:31–48.
Dries DJ, Marini JJ.Airway pressure release ventilation. J
Burn Care Res. 2009;30:929–36.
Echinard C, Dantzer E. Reconstruction of the nose in
deep extensive facial burns. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1995;40:238–50.
Elamrani D, Zahid A, Aboujaafr N, et al. Les retrac-
tions cervicales post-brûlure-a propos de 49 cas et revue de la literature. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2011;24:149–56.
Endorf FW, Dries DJ. Noninvasive ventilation in the
burned patient. J Burn Care Res. 2010;31:217–28.
Endorf FW, Gamelli RL. Inhalation injury, pulmonary
perturbations, and uid resuscitation. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28:80–3.
Erol OO.Prefabricated vertical myocutaneous ap of the
nose in facially burned patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:341–5.
References
151
Fagan SP, Bilodeau ML, Goverman J.Burn intensive care.
Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94:765–79. Feldman AE, MacMillan BG. Burn injury in children:
declining need for reconstructive surgery as related
to use of neck orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
1980;61:441–9. Fochtman A, Keck M, Mittlböck M, etal. Tissue expan-
sion for correction of scars due to burn and other
causes: a retrospective comparative study of various
complications. Burns. 2013;39:984–9. Foster MA, Moledina J, Jeffery SL.Epidemiology of U.K.
military burns. J Burn Care Res. 2011;32:415–20. Frank DH, Wachtel T, Frank HA. The early treat-
ment and reconstruction of eyelid burns. J Trauma.
1983;23:874–7. Fraulin FO, Illmayer SJ, Tredget EE.Assessment of cos-
metic and functional results of conservative versus
surgical management of facial burns. J Burn Care
Rehabil. 1996;17:19–29. Gangemi EN, Gregori D, Berchialla P, etal. Epidemiology
and risk factors for pathologic scarring after burn
wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10:93–102. Genuino GA, Baluyut-Angeles KV, Espiritu AP, et al.
Topical petrolatum gel alone versus topical sil-
ver sulfadiazine with standard gauze dressings for
the treatment of supercial partial thickness burns
in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Burns.
2014;40:1267–73. Goldenheim PD. An appraisal of povidone iodine and
wound healing. Postgrad Med. 1993;69(Suppl
3):S97–105.
Governa M, Bortolani A, Beghini D, etal. Skin expansion
in burn sequelae: results and complications. Acta Chir
Plast. 1996;38:147–53. Greenhalgh DG, Hinchcliff K, Sen S, et al. A ten-year
experience with pediatric face grafts. J Burn Care Res.
2013;34:576–84. Grifths RW. Management of multiple casualties with
burns. Br Med J. 1985;291:917–8. Grishkevich VM. Post-burn microstomia: anatomy
and elimination with trapeze-ap plasty. Burns.
2011;37:484–9. Haik J, Liran A, Tessone A, etal. Burns in Israel: demo-
graphic, etiologic and clinical trends, 1997-2003. Isr
Med Assoc J. 2007;9:659–62. Hall C, Hardin C, Corkins CJ, et al. Pathophysiologic
mechanisms and current treatments for cutane-
ous sequelae of burn wounds. Compr Physiol.
2017;8:371–405. Han TH, Teissler H, Han RJ, et al. Managing dif-
cult airway in patients with post-burn mentosternal
and circumoral contractures. Int J Burns Trauma.
2012;2:80–5. Hartford CE, Kealy GP. Care of outpatient burns. In:
Herndon DN, editor. Total burn care. Saunders-
Elsevier; 2007. p.67–80. Heilbronn CM, Srider PF, Folbe AJ, etal. Burns in the
head and neck: a national representative analy-
sis of emergency department visits. Laryngoscope.
2015;125:1573–8.
Heinrich JJ, Brand DA, Cuono CB.The role of topical
treatment as a determinant of infection in outpatient burns. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1988;9:253–7.
Herndon DN, Thompson PB, Traber DL.Pulmonary injury
in burned patients. Crit Care Clin. 1985;1:79–96.
Herndon DN, Rutan R, Rutan T. The management of
burned children. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1993;14:3–8.
Hlava P, Moserova J, Konigova R. Validity of clinical
assessment of the depth of a thermal injury. Acta Chir Plast. 1983;25:202–8.
Holley AD, Reade MC, Lipman J, et al. There is no
re without smoke! Pathophysiology and treatment of inhalational injury in burns: a narrative review. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020;48:114–22.
Hoogewerf CJ, van Baar ME, Hop MJ, etal. Burns to the
head and neck: epidemiology and predictors of sur­gery. Burns. 2013a;39:1184–92.
Hoogewerf CJ, Van Baar ME, Hop MJ, etal. Topical treat-
ment for facial burns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013b;1:CD008058.
Hoogewerf CJ, Hop MJ, Nieuwenhuis MK, etal. Topical
treatment for facial burns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7:CD008058.
Hu J, Liu T, Zhou X, etal. Treatment of post burn ear defect
with expanded upper arm ap and consequent expansion without skin grafting. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:398–401.
Huang TT, Larson DL, Lewis SR. Burn alopecia. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 1977;60:763–7.
Hudson DA, Grob M. Optimizing results with tis-
sue expansion: 10 simple rules for successful tissue expander insertion. Burns. 2005;31:1–4.
Ioannides C, Fossion E, McGrouther AD.Reconstruction
for large defects of the scalp and cranium. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999;27:145–52.
Ivy RH. Who originated the Z-plasty? Plast Reconstr
Surg. 1971;47:67–72.
Jandera V, Hudson DA, de Wet PM, et al. Cooling the
burn wound: evaluation of different modalities. Burns. 2000;26:256–70.
Janis JE, Khausa I, Lehrman CR, et al. Reconstructive
management of devastating electrical injuries to the face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:839–47.
Jaskille AD, Ramella-Roman JC, Shupp JW, etal. Critical
review of burn depth assessment techniques: part II.Review of laser Doppler technology. J Burn Care Res. 2010;31:151–7.
Jin X, Teng L, Zhao M, etal. Reconstruction of cicatricial
microstomia and lower facial deformity by windowed, bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator ap. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:616–20.
Kalantar Motamedi MH, Heydari M, et al. Prevalence
and pattern of facial burns: a 5-year assessment of 808 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:676–82.
Kauvar DS, Cancio LC, Wolf SE, et al. Comparison of
combat and non-combat burns from ongoing U.S. mil­itary operations. J Surg Res. 2006;132:195–200.
Khatib M, Jabir S, Fitzgerald O’ Connor E, etal. A sys-
tematic review of the evolution of laser Doppler techniques in burn depth assessment. Plast Surg Int. 2014;2014:621792.
152
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
11 Burns oftheScalp, Face, andNeck
Kraenzlin FS, Mushin OP, Ayazi S, et al. Epidemiology
and outcomes of auricular burn injuries. J Burn Care
Res. 2018;39:326–31. Kumar P, Shah PL.Preauricular ap for post burn ear lobe
reconstruction– a case report. Burns. 2000;26:571–4. Larkin JM, Moylan JA.Tetanus following a minor burn. J
Trauma. 1975;15:546–8. Lazzeri D, Su W, Qian Y, et al. Prefabricated neck
expanded skin ap with the supercial temporal ves-
sels for facial resurfacing. J Reconstr Microsurg.
2013;29:255–62. Lee JW, Jang YC, Oh SJ.Esthetic and functional recon-
struction for burn deformities of the lower lip and
chin with free radial forearm ap. Ann Plast Surg.
2006;56:384–6. Li Q, Zan T, Gu B, et al. Face resurfacing using a cer-
vicothoracic skin ap prefabricated by lateral thigh
fascial ap and tissue expander. Microsurgery.
2009;29:515–23. Longacre J, Berry HK, Bosom CR, etal. The effects of
Z-plasty on hypertrophic scars. Scand J Plast Reconstr
Surg. 1976;10:113–28. Lund CC, Browder NC.The estimation of areas of burns.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1944;79:352–8. Luo X, Liu F, Wang X, etal. Region –oriented and staged
treatment strategy in reconstruction of severe cervical
contracture. PLoS One. 2015;10:e 0122669. Mabrouk A, Boughdadi NS, Helal HA, etal. Moist occlu-
sive dressing (Aquacel® Ag) versus moist open dress-
ing (MEBO®) in the management of partial-thickness
facial burns: a comparative study in Ain Shams
University. Burns. 2012;38:396–403. Mackie DP, van Dehn F, Knape P, etal. Increase in early
mechanical ventilation of burn patients: an effect of
current emergency trauma management. J Trauma.
2011;70:611–5. MacLennan SE, Corcoran JF, Neale HW.Tissue expan-
sion in head and neck burn reconstruction. Clin Plast
Surg. 2000;27:121–32. Makiguchi T, Yokoo S, Koitabashi A, etal. Treatment of
microstomia caused by burn with a nasolabial ap– an
ingenious approach for tugging and xation of the oral
commissure. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:568–70. Malhotra R, Sheikh I, Dheansa B. The management of
eyelid burns. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54:356–71. Manders EK, Graham WP, Schendon MT, et al. Skin
expansion to eliminate large scalp defects. Ann Plast
Surg. 1984;12:305–12. McCall JE, Cahill TJ.Respiratory care of the burn patient.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005;26:200–6. McCauley RL, Oliphant JR, Robson MC.Tissue expan-
sion in the correction of burn alopecia: classica-
tion and methods of correction. Ann Plast Surg.
1990;25:103–15. McCrory MC, Woodruff AG, Saha AK, et al.
Characteristics of burn-injured children in 117
U.S.PICUs (2009-2017): a retrospective virtual pedi-
atric systems database study. Pediatr Crit Care Med.
2021;22:616–28.
Menon S, Jacques M, Harvey JG, etal. Pediatric scalp
burns: hair today, gone tomorrow? J Burn Care Res. 2015;236:e18–22.
Middle KK, Batchinsky A, Cancio LC, etal. Wood bark
smoke induces lung and pleural plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 and stabilizes its mRNA in porcine lung cells. Shock. 2011;36:128–37.
Miller TA. The Tagliacozzi ap as a method of nasal
and palatal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:870–5.
Miller AC, Ferrada PA, Kadri SS, etal. High-frequency
ventilation modalities as salvage therapy for smoke inhalation-associated acute lung injury: a systematic review. J Intensive Care Med. 2018;33:335–45.
Mills DC 2nd, Roberts LW, Mason AD Jr, etal. Suppurative
chondritis: its incidence, prevention, and treatment in burn patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:267–76.
Mlcak RP, Buffalo MC.Pre-hospital management, trans-
portation, and emergency care. In: Herndon DN, editor. Total burn care. Saunders- Elsevier; 2007. p.81–92.
Mlcak RP, Suman OE, Herndon DN.Respiratory manage-
ment of inhalation injury. Burns. 2007;33:2–13.
Morgan ED, Bledsoe SC, Barker J.Ambulatory manage-
ment of burns. Am Fam Physician. 2000;62:2015–26.
Motamed S, Davami B.Eyebrow reconstruction follow-
ing burn injury. Burns. 2005;31:495–9.
Moylan JA Jr, Wilmore DW, Mouton DE, et al. Early
diagnosis of inhalation injury using 133 xenon lung scan. Ann Surg. 1972;176:477–84.
Muller M, Gahankari D, Herndon DN.Operative wound
management. In: Herndon DN, editor. Total burn care. Saunders-Elsevier; 2007. p.192.
Mun GH, Jeon BJ, Lim SY, et al. Reconstruction of
postburn neck contracture using free thin thoracodor­sal artery perforator aps with cervicoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1524–32.
Murakami K, Traber DL. Pathophysiological basis
of smoke inhalation injury. News Physiol Sci. 2003;18:125–9.
Mustardé JC. Repair and reconstruction in the orbital
region. Churchill Livingstone; 1991. p.34–51.
Neale HW, High RM, Billmon DA, etal. Complications
of controlled tissue expansion in the pediatric burn patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:840–5.
Ngim RC.The burned ear (II): a prospective clinical study
of 100 patients with 150 ear burns. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1992;21:605–11.
Nielson CB, Duethman NC, Howard JM, et al. Burns:
pathophysiology of systemic complications and cur­rent management. J Burn Care Res. 2017;38:e469–81.
Norman G, Christie J, Liu Z, etal. Antiseptics for burns.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7:CD011821.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.
Nugent N, Herndon DN.Diagnosis and treatment of inha-
lation injury. In: Herndon DN, editor. Total burn care. Saunders/Elsevier; 2007. p.262–72.
Ojo P, Palmer J, Garvey R, etal. Patterns of burns in child
abuse. Am Surg. 2007;73:253–5.
References
153
Onah II.A classication of post-burn mentosternal con-
tractures. Arch Surg. 2005;140:671–5. Pallua N, Wolter TP. Moving forwards: the anterior
supraclavicular artery perforator (a-SAP) ap: a new
pedicled or free perforator ap based on the anterior
supraclavicular vessels. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
2013;66:489–96. Palmieri TL. Inhalation injury: research progress and
needs. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28:549–54. Parihar A, Parihar MS, Milner S, et al. Oxidative stress
and anti-oxidative mobilization in burn injury. Burns.
2008;34:6–17. Park C, Suk Roh T.Total ear reconstruction in the devas-
cularized temporoparietal region: I.Use of the contra-
lateral temporoparietal fascial free ap. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 2001;108:1145–53. Parrett BM, Pomahac B, Orgill D, etal. The role of free-
tissue transfer for head and neck burn reconstruction.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1871–8. Patel KH, Nayyer L, Seifalian AM.Chondrogenic poten-
tial of bone narrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells
on a novel auricular-shaped, nanocomposite scaffold.
J Tissue Eng. 2013;4:2041731413516782. Pearl R, Sabbagh W. Reconstruction following traumatic
partial amputation of the ear. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2011;127:621–9. Philp L, Umraw N, Cartotto R.Late outcomes after graft-
ing of the severely burned face: a quality improvement
initiative. J Burn Care Res. 2012;33:45–56. Planas J, Cervelli V, Planas G.The retraction of the oral
opening in burned patients. Plast Reconstr Surg.
1999;103:1082–6. Prakash S, Mullick P.Airway management in patients with
burn contractures of the neck. Burns. 2015;41:1627–35. Pruitt BA, Wolf SE, Mason AD Jr. Epidemiological,
demographic and outcome characteristics of burn
injury. In: Herndon DN, editor. Total burn care.
Saunders-Elsevier; 2007. p.14–32. Purdue GF, Hunt JL. Chondritis of the burned
ear: a preventable complication. Am J Surg.
1986;152:257–9. Ray E, Wu T, Nazarian Mobin SS, etal. Review of options
for burned ear reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg.
2010;21:1165–9. Rak A, Chabak H, Diouri M, et al Cervical burns
sequelae: epidemiological, clinical and therapeuti-
caspects in Morocco. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;20:413. Rhee P, Nunley MK, Demetriades D, etal. Tetanus and
trauma: a review and recommendations. J Trauma.
2005;58:1082–8. Richardson C, Upton D, Rippon M. Treatment for
wound pruritus following burns. J Wound Care.
2014;23:227–8. Romanowski KS, Palmieri TL, Sen S, etal. More than one
third of intubations in patients transferred to burn cen-
ters are unnecessary: proposed guidelines for appro-
priate intubation of the burn patient. J Burn Care Res.
2016;37:e409–14. Rose GK, Mason JD, Varma SK.Effect of facial burns on
the nasal mucosa. Burns. 1996;22:631–2.
Rubino C, Farace F, Puddu A, etal. Total upper and lower
eyelid replacement following thermal burn using an ALT ap – a case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:578–81.
Ruth GD, Smith S, Bronson M, etal. Outcomes related
to burn-related child abuse: a case series. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003;24:318–21.
Sakurai H, Soejima K, Takeuchi M, etal. Reconstruction
of perioral burn deformities in male patients by using the expanded frontal scalp. Burns. 2007;33:1059–64.
Schmid E. The use of auricular cartilage and compos-
ite grafts in reconstruction of the upper lip, with special reference to reconstruction of the philtrum. In: Broadbent TR, editor. Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic Surgery. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica; 1964. p.306.
Schrage NF, Struck HG, Gerard M.Recommendations for
acute treatment for chemical and thermal burns of eyes and lids. Ophthalmologe. 2011;108:916–20.
Serghiou MA, McLaughlin A, Herndon DN.Alternative
splinting methods for the prevention and correc­tion of burn scar torticollis. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003;24:336–40.
Shavit I, Knaani-Levinz H.Images in emergency medi-
cine. Child abuse caused by cigarette burns. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51:579–82.
Shen W, Cui J, Chen J, et al. Inversion of the ap at the
lower ear and restoration of the ap at postauricular skin for reconstruction of the earlobe. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:560–2.
Sheridan RL.Airway management and respiratory care of
the burn patient. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2000;38:129–45.
Shirani KZ, Pruitt BA Jr, Mason AD Jr. The inuence of
inhalation injury and pneumonia on burn mortality. Ann Surg. 1987;205:82–7.
Sinha M, Scott JR, Watson SB.Prelaminated free radial
forearm ap for a total nasal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:953–7.
Sinha I, Nabi M, Simko LC, etal. Head and neck burns are
associated with long-term patient-reported dissatisfac­tion with appearance: a burn model system National Database study. Burns. 2019;45:293–302.
Slaviero L, Avruscio G, Vindigni V, et al. Antiseptics
for burns: a review of the evidence. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2018;31:198–203.
Solanki NS, Middleton S, Quinn L, etal. Audit of teta-
nus immunization status in pediatric burn patients. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;50:495–6.
Song B, Xiao B, Liu C, et al. Neck burn reconstruc-
tion with pre-expanded scapular free aps. Burns. 2015;41:624–30.
Sousse LE, Herndon DN, Andersen CR, etal. High tidal
volume decreases adult respiratory distress syndrome, atelectasis, and ventilator days compared with low tidal volume in pediatric burned patients with inhala­tion injury. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:570–8.
Spence RJ. An algorithm for total and subtotal facial
reconstruction using an expanded transposition ap: a 20-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:795–805.
154
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
11 Burns oftheScalp, Face, andNeck
Spencer T, Hall AJ, Stawell RJ.Ophthalmologic sequelae
of thermal burns over ten years at the Alfred Hospital.
Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18:196–201. Stern JD, Goldfarb IW, Slater H.Ophthalmological com-
plications as a manifestation of burn injury. Burns.
1996;22:135–6. Still JM Jr, Law EJ, Belcher KE, etal. Experience with
burns of the eyes and lids in a regional burn unit. J
Burn Care Rehabil. 1995;16:248–52. Stratta RJ, Safe JR, Kravitz M, etal. Management of tar
and asphalt injuries. Am J Surg. 1983;146:766–9. Sveen J, Ekselius L, Gerdin B, etal. A prospective lon-
gitudinal study of posttraumatic stress disorder
symptom trajectories after burn injury. J Trauma.
2011;71:1808–15. Taylor LB, Walker J. A review of selected microstomia
prevention appliances. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19:413–8. Taylor HO, Carty M, Driscoll D, etal. Nasal reconstruc-
tion after severe facial burns using a local turn-down
ap. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:175–9. Tayyaba FU, Amin MM, Attaur-Rasool S, et al.
Reconstruction of post burn scalp alopecia by using
expanded hair-bearing scalp aps. Pak J Med Sci.
2015;31:1405–10. Thai KN, Billmire DA, Yakuboff KP.Total eyelid recon-
struction with free dorsalis pedis ap after deep facial
burn. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1048–51. Tsai FC, Yang JY, Mardini S, etal. Free split- cutaneous
perforator aps procured using a three-dimensional
harvest technique for the reconstruction of post-
burn contracture defects. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2004;113:185–93. Van Loey NE, Van Son MJ. Psychopathology and psy-
chological problems in patients with burn scars: epi-
demiology and management. Am J Clin Dermatol.
2003;4:245–72. Varkey M, Ding J, Tredget EE. Advances in skin
substitutes- potential of tissue engineered skin for
facilitating anti-brotic healing. J Funct Biomater.
2015;6:547–63. Walker PF, Buehner MF, Wood LA, etal. Diagnosis and
management of inhalation injury: an updated review.
Crit Care. 2015;19:351–67. Wallace AB. The exposure treatment of burns. Lancet.
1951;1:501–4. Wang J, Fan J. Cicatricial eyebrow reconstruction with
a dense-packing one- to two-hair grafting technique.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1420–6.
Wang XK, Zhai QK, Xue L, etal. Treatment of postburn
anteriorly located neck contractures with local aps. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:e387–90.
Wang BB, Patel KF, Wolfe AE, et al. Adolescents with
and without head and neck burns: comparison of long­term outcomes in the burn model system National Database. Burns. 2022;48:40–50.
Wasiak J, Cleland H, Campbell F, et al. Dressings for
supercial and partial thickness burns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD 002106.
Watanabe T, Furuta S, Hataya Y, etal. Reconstruction of
the eyelids and nose after a burn injury using a radial forearm ap. Burns. 1997;23:360–5.
WHO. 2014. www.who.int/entity/mediacentre/factsheets/
fs365/en/- WHO/Burns. Accessed 19 Nov 2015.
Wiesner N, Dutescu RM, Uthoff D, etal. First aid therapy
for corrosive chemical eye burns: results of a 30-year longitudinal study with two different decontamina­tion concepts. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257:1795–803.
Wilkes GH, Wolfaardt JF.Osseointegrated alloplastic ver-
sus autogenous ear reconstruction: criteria for treat­ment selection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:967–79.
Yamamura H, Kaga S, Kaneda K, etal. Chest computed
tomography performed on admission helps predict the severity of smoke inhalation injury. Crit Care. 2013;17:R95.
Yang JY, Tsai FC, Chana JS, etal. Use of free thin antero-
lateral thigh aps combined with cervicoplasty for reconstruction of postburn anterior cervical contrac­tures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;100:39–46.
Yeong EK, Mann R, Goldberg M, etal. Improved accu-
racy of burn wound assessment using laser Doppler. J Trauma. 1996;40:956–61.
Yeung JK, Leung LT, Papp A.A survey of current prac-
tices in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhala­tional injuries in Canadian burn centres. Can J Plastic Surg. 2013;21:221–5.
Yu JA, Lin HZ, Jin ZH, etal. Free anterolateral thigh ap
for coverage of large scalp defects in pediatric burn population. J Burn Care Res. 2012;33:e180–5.
Zan T, Li H, Gu B, etal. Surgical treatment of facial soft-
tissue deformities in postburn patients: a proposed classication based on a retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1001e–14e.
Zweifel CJ, Guggenheim M, Jandali AR, etal. Management
of microstomia in adult burn patients revisited. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:a351–7.
Wound Healing Disturbances: TheUnfavorable Result
12
12.1 Phases ofWound Healing
There are four distinct but overlapping phases of wound healing (hemostasis, inammation, pro­liferation, and remodeling). During wound heal­ing, highly specialized cells interact with an extracellular matrix to lay down a new frame­work for tissue growth and repair (Diegelmann and Evans 2004). The whole process is inu­enced by various cellular interactions, and the various steps are regulated by the local release of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and inhibitors (Goldberg and Diegelmann 2010).
12.1.1 Hemostasis
Hemostasis aims at reducing and nally stopping hemorrhage. Vasoconstriction; activation of platelets which release bronectin, thrombospon­din, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and von Willebrand factor resulting in further activation and aggregation of platelets; and formation of a brin matrix in which platelets are trapped lead to the formation of a stable clot within the provi­sional matrix. Platelets further release platelet­derived growth factor (PDGF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), which recruit addi­tional cells such as neutrophils, macrophages, and broblasts and activate the production of col­lagen and glycosaminoglycans by broblasts,
which are important for the repair of extracellular matrix (Rumalla and Borah 2001).
12.1.2 Inammation
This is the second phase of wound healing, which begins within the rst 24h after an injury and can last up to 2weeks in a normally healing wound. Clinically, it is characterized by rubor (redness), calor (heat), tumor (swelling), and dolor (pain), all of which result from the release of vasoactive amines and histamine-rich granules from mast cells. These mast cell mediators alter vascular permeability and allow the passage of neutro­phils from the vasculature through the vascular wall to the site of injury together with uid, which causes the swelling and pressure-causing pain (Ali Komi etal. 2020).
The neutrophils are attracted to the site of injury by a process called chemotaxis and are drawn there by soluble mediators, such as a breakdown of complement called C5a that is a waste product produced by bacteria and the potent chemokine interleukin (IL)-8 (Guo and Ward 2005; Goldberg and Diegelmann 2010).
The neutrophils move through the extracellu­lar matrix by releasing matrix-degrading enzymes such as elastase and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8. On their arrival at the wound site, they begin to aggressively phagocytize any foreign
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 C. A. Ioannidis, Soft Tissue Injuries of the Head and Neck,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14915-3_12
155
156
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
12 Wound Healing Disturbances: TheUnfavorable Result
materials and kill bacteria by the enzymes and reactive oxygen species, which they generate. They also release IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a to begin the activation of broblasts and epithelial cells, thus initiating the proliferative phase.
Macrophages also play a key role during the inammatory phase. Wound macrophages are derived from xed tissue monocytes and are acti­vated by chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, and soluble fragments of extracellular matrix components produced by proteolytic degradation of collagen and bronectin (Diegelmann et al.
1981). The function of the macrophages is to
remove any residual bacteria, foreign bodies, and remaining necrotic tissue. It is similar to that of neutrophils, but macrophages better regulate pro­teolytic destruction of wound tissue by secreting protease inhibitors. Macrophages also ingest the bacteria-laden neutrophils and mediate progres­sion of the wound from the inammatory to the proliferative phase (Goldberg and Diegelmann
2010). They secrete a number of growth factors
and cytokines (PDGF, TGF-β, TNF-α, broblast growth factor, insulin-like growth factor 1, and IL-6), which recruit broblasts and endothelial cells to the wound site for matrix deposition and neovascularization.
12.1.3 Proliferation
The proliferative phase is characterized by bro­blast proliferation and neoangiogenesis. Granulation tissue formation and process of epi­thelization also occur.
Mast cells stimulate broblast proliferation during the proliferative phase via IL-4, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and basic broblast growth factor (bFGF) to produce a new extracellular matrix (Ali Komi et al. 2020). Fibroblasts migrate into the wound in response to mediators released from macrophages and plate­lets. They move through the extracellular matrix by binding bronectin, vitronectin, and brin and by secreting MMPs, which facilitate their move­ment. Once the broblasts have entered the wound, they produce collagen, proteoglycans,
and other components to replace the provisional matrix and to provide a stable extracellular matrix. Fibroblast activity is mainly regulated by PDGF and TGF-β. PDGF secreted by platelets and macrophages stimulates broblast prolifera­tion, chemotaxis, and collagenase expression. Angiogenesis is initiated by the activation of endothelial cells by TNF-a and basic FGF (βFGF). The new blood vessels promote blood ow to support the high metabolic needs of the newly formed tissue. Local stimulatory factors (VEGF, angiostatin, endostatin, pigment endothelium- derived growth factor, thrombos­pondin) regulate angiogenesis (Tahergorabi and Khazaei 2012). Oxygen tension, low pH, and high lactate levels stimulate angiogenesis (Hunt etal. 2007).
In the course of wound healing, the granula­tion tissue forms. It provides the transitional replacement for normal dermis and ultimately evolves into scar. Granulation tissue is rich in blood vessels, broblasts, macrophages, and ran­domly organized collagen bers. The metabolic rate for this tissue is higher compared with nor­mal dermis, which reects the activity required for cellular migration, division, and protein syn­thesis and thus the importance of adequate nutri­tion and oxygen to properly heal the wound (Goldberg and Diegelmann 2010).
Contraction is an important part of wound healing, as it enables wound closure. It occurs during the proliferative phase. The traction forces of broblasts and myobroblasts are believed to be responsible for wound contraction and closure (Tomasek etal. 2002). However, excessive myo­broblast activity, accompanied by elevated lev­els of mechanical stress in the healing region, often causes scar tissue formation and, in the worst case, contracture of tissues, leading to local immobilization and loss of function (Li and Wang
2011).
12.1.4 Remodeling
This is the last phase of wound healing, and it is characterized by maturation of granulation tissue into a scar. Metabolic activity, cell density, and
12.2 Mechanisms ofWound Healing
157
water content of the wound decrease. The most dramatic change, however, occurs in the overall type, amount, and organization of collagen bers, resulting in increased tensile strength of the wound. Initially, there is increased deposition of type III collagen that is gradually replaced by type I collagen, the dominant brillar collagen in skin (Clore etal. 1979). Collagen bers are cross­linked by the enzyme lysyl oxidase, which is secreted by broblasts in the extracellular matrix (Smith-Mungo and Kagan 1998). Overexpression of lysyl oxidase seems to increase cross-linking and improve tissue strength in dermal wound healing (Lau et al. 2006). The degradation of extracellular matrix components to facilitate epi­thelial cell migration into the wound, angiogene­sis, and overall tissue remodeling is controlled by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Matrix adhe­sion and signaling are regulated by integrins. Adhesion by integrins regulates the expression of MMPs. In addition, certain MMPs can bind to integrins or other receptors on the cell surface involved in enzyme activation, thereby providing a mechanism for localized matrix degradation (Steffensen etal. 2001).
MMP expression is regulated by TGF-β in normal broblasts and keratinocytes. The three mammalian isoforms (TGF-β 1, 2, and 3) have been localized in healing wounds (O’Kane and Ferguson 1997). Manipulation of the ratios of TGF-β superfamily members, particularly the ratio of TGF-β 1 relative to TGF-β 3, reduces scarring and brosis (O’Kane and Ferguson
1997). TGF-β also minimizes matrix degradation
by downregulating protease secretion and stimu­lating synthesis of tissue inhibitors of metallo­proteinases (TIMPs) (Goldberg and Diegelmann
2010).
Wound extracellular matrix remodeling con­tinues as the matrix strives to achieve the highly organized tissue structure, which was present before the injury. The resulting scar tissue, how­ever, can only achieve about 80% of the initial tensile strength. When degradation maintains an equilibrium, a ne line scar forms. If matrix syn­thesis is greater than degradation, the result is a hypertrophic scar. If degradation is greater than
synthesis or if synthesis is inhibited (e.g., ste­roids, cancer chemotherapeutic agents), the scar becomes weak and wound dehiscence may occur (Goldberg and Diegelmann 2010).
12.2 Mechanisms ofWound Healing
Dermal wounds heal by three main mechanisms: connective tissue deposition, contraction, and epithelialization. The latter is the process whereby epithelial cells surrounding the wound margin or in residual skin appendages (rete pegs, hair follicles, sebaceous glands) migrate into the wound because of the loss of contact inhibition of cuboidal basal keratinocytes (O’Toole 2001). These three processes come into play to varying degrees, depending on the type of wound. Linear wounds sutured together heal by what is termed primary intention (per primam). The main mech­anism necessary is connective tissue deposition. There is also minimal epithelialization, which occurs along the surface of the wound line. Defect wounds heal by secondary intention (per secundam). These open wounds heal mainly by tissue contraction. An interaction between bro­blasts and the matrix generates a centripetal force to advance the edges towards the center of the wound. There is some connective tissue deposi­tion, and this is nally covered by epithelializa­tion. Abrasions (thickness <0.015mm) heal by epithelialization. After an extensive multistep process, the basal epithelial cells proliferate near the wound margin, producing a monolayer that covers the entire wound surface.
The restoration of the skin barrier is controlled by several molecular mechanisms that synergisti­cally regulate cell kinetics, enzymatic functions, and neurovascular activation. These pathways include genetic and epigenetic (DNA methyla­tion, histone modication, and noncoding regula­tory RNA editing) activation, which modulate physiological wound healing. The DNA back­ground modulating skin restoration could be used to plan new diagnostics and therapeutics (Palmieri etal. 2017).
158
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
12 Wound Healing Disturbances: TheUnfavorable Result
12.3 Pathologic Responses toWound Healing
12.3.1 Hypo- andHyperpigmentation
Acute wounds progress through the healing phases in an orderly fashion for normal healing to occur. The early, immature scar is hard and raised due to the bulk of excessive matrix (mostly col­lagen) deposited in the early healing stages. It is also reddish due to the dense capillary network. As wound maturity progresses, the broblasts and capillaries recede, the collagen continues to remodel, and the scar becomes at, soft, and usu­ally pale to adjacent skin colored over a period of 6–12months.
Scar tissue contains no elastin, and the colla­gen bundles are oriented along stress lines; it therefore lacks elasticity. Scar tissue contains no sweat and sebaceous glands and is therefore dry. Mature scar tissue typically lacks normal pig­mentation and is usually pale. However, it can be dark in patients with pigmented skin (Figs.12.1 and 12.2). Particularly in burns, a mixture of both hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation may be encountered (Fig.12.3). A recent experimen­tal study in a red Duroc pig model of hypertro­phic scar formation showed that melanocyte number was similar in hypopigmented and hyperpigmented tissues. Hyperpigmented tis­sues, however, showed a greater amount of mela­nin and a-MSH, along with immunohistochemical evidence of stimulated melanocytes. The authors’ observations encourage further investigation of melanocyte stimulation and the inammatory environment within a wound that may inuence melanocyte activity (Travis etal. 2015). A change
of dendritic structure, reduced proliferation rate, faulty melanin synthesis, and transfer of melanin from melanocytes to keratinocytes in postburn hypopigmented skin were considered potential causes of hypopigmentation in burned patients (Dutta etal. 2020).
Abnormal pigmentation renders scars more noticeable with eventual serious adverse sequelae for those affected. Furthermore, hypopigmented scars lack melanin leaving them without protec­tion against ultraviolet radiation.
Randomized animal studies as well as clinical studies have shown that ultraviolet radiation increases scar pigmentation and worsens a scar’s clinical appearance (Haedersdal etal. 1998; Due etal. 2007). Preventive measures include avoid­ing exposure to sunlight and use of sunscreens with a high sun protection factor (SPF>50) until the scar has matured.
Currently, there is a lack of proven treatment options which effectively and permanently abol­ish this wound healing complication. Among noninvasive treatments, makeup and skin tanning (for hypo) and bleaching lotions (for hyper) can offer some improvement. However, topical treat­ments carry risks (allergic reaction, skin irrita­tion, infections, skin diseases, etc.). Laser has been proven to be effective in hypo- (activates melanosomes) and hyper- (destroys melano­somes) pigmented lesions. However, in cases of hyperpigmentation, the possible worsening of the problem through stimulating melanin production should be considered. Furthermore, it can require multiple treatments. Although laser therapy (e.g., picosecond and Q-switched lasers) is increas­ingly being utilized to treat dermal hyperpigmen­tation, the reported success rates have varied
Fig. 12.1 (a, b) Hyperpigmented scar of the left upper eyelid in a patient with pigmented skin. The notching of the free lid margin is clearly identiable
ab