Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5361_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
23 Мб
Скачать
13 Wear andFriction Mechanism Study inKnee andHip Rehabilitation
417
optimized friction properties and reduced susceptibility to wear. Such modications have the potential to signicantly improve the longevity of implants by minimizing abrasion and friction-induced degradation [157].
13.10.3.4 Multidisciplinary Approaches
Biomaterial innovations for wear resistance in hip and knee replacement prosthetics are benetting from a multidisciplinary approach. Collaboration between materials scientists, engineers, and medical professionals is fostering a comprehensive under­standing of the complex interactions between biomaterials and the human body. This collaborative effort ensures that emerging biomaterials are not only wear­resistant but also biocompatible, addressing the holistic needs of patients undergo­ing joint replacement procedures. Hence, ongoing biomaterial innovations present a transformative outlook for hip and knee replacement prosthetics, promising even greater wear resistance through the integration of advanced materials, coatings, and surface modications. As these innovations progress, they hold the potential to redene the standards for implant durability, contributing to improved patient out­comes and the sustained success of joint replacement procedures [252].
13.10.4 Articial Intelligence inWear Prediction
The integration of articial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning algo­rithms, marks a groundbreaking development in hip and knee replacement prosthet­ics. AI’s capacity to analyze wear data and predict wear patterns holds tremendous potential for advancing orthopedic care, enabling early intervention, and tailoring personalized treatment strategies for optimal patient outcomes [253].
13.10.4.1 Wear Data Analysis
Machine learning algorithms excel at processing vast datasets, and in the context of hip and knee replacements, they can prociently analyze wear data. These algo­rithms can discern intricate patterns that may elude traditional analytical methods by assimilating information on joint articulation, implant materials, patient activity levels, and other relevant factors. This data-driven approach provides a comprehen­sive understanding of wear dynamics, laying the foundation for precise wear predic­tion [253].
418
A. Choudhari et al.
13.10.4.2 Predictive Wear Patterns
The predictive capabilities of AI extend to forecasting wear patterns over time. By identifying subtle changes and trends in wear data, machine learning models can generate predictive models that anticipate the progression of wear in hip and knee implants. This proactive approach empowers healthcare professionals to foresee potential issues before they manifest clinically, facilitating early intervention and preventing complications associated with wear-related deterioration [254].
13.10.4.3 Early Intervention Strategies
The real-time wear predictions provided by AI enable the formulation of early inter­vention strategies. Healthcare providers can leverage this information to implement personalized treatment plans tailored to each patient’s unique wear patterns. Whether through adjustments in rehabilitation protocols, changes in physical activ­ity recommendations, or modications to the implant itself, early interventions based on AI predictions aim to mitigate wear-related complications and optimize the long-term performance of the prosthetic joint.
13.10.4.4 Personalized Treatment Plans
Articial intelligence facilitates the creation of personalized treatment plans for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement procedures. By considering individ­ual wear proles, patient characteristics, and lifestyle factors, machine learning algorithms can assist healthcare professionals in tailoring interventions that align with each patient’s specic needs and circumstances. This personalized approach maximizes the efcacy of treatments, contributing to improved patient satisfaction and overall outcomes. Therefore, the integration of articial intelligence in wear prediction represents a transformative leap in hip and knee replacement prosthetics. Machine learning algorithms offer a data-driven, predictive approach that not only enhances our understanding of wear dynamics but also empowers healthcare pro­viders to intervene early and deliver personalized treatment strategies. As AI tech­nologies continue to evolve, their role in wear prediction is poised to shape a future where orthopedic care is not only proactive but also uniquely tailored to the indi­vidual needs of each patient [255].
13.10.4.5 Effect ofEnvironment onTesting
The inuence of environmental conditions, manufacturing techniques to produce the prosthetics using conventional methods such as CNC technology [256], and the extent of vacuum testing are critical factors in understanding wear and friction mechanisms in knee and hip rehabilitation. In a comprehensive review, these
13 Wear andFriction Mechanism Study inKnee andHip Rehabilitation
419
elements collectively shape the reliability and accuracy of research outcomes. Efcient HVAC systems [257, 258], coupled with precise temperature control, are pivotal in maintaining consistent environmental conditions during wear and friction studies. Fluctuations in temperature and humidity can introduce variables that impact material properties and friction behavior. Thus, meticulous control of the environment ensures reproducibility and reliability of experimental results. Vacuum conditions are crucial for simulating physiological environments where lubrication and wear occur in knee and hip joints [259, 260]. By eliminating air and moisture, vacuum testing enhances the reliability of tribological measurements, providing insights into the performance of implant materials under realistic conditions.

13.11 Conclusion

The realm of knee and hip rehabilitation, encompassing research on wear and fric­tion mechanisms, is a multifaceted arena that extends beyond the immediate scope of implant longevity and material selection. By exploring pivotal factors such as biological responses to wear debris, regulatory standards, and patient-specic con­siderations, this comprehensive review has illuminated a rich tapestry of consider­ations essential for optimizing prosthetic performance. The study has underlined the pivotal role of clinical standards, underscored the clinical signicance of wear and friction in various hip and knee replacements, and delineated the diverse types of wear in these joints. The exploration of materials, from traditional metallic and ceramic implants to the burgeoning realm of composite and surface-modied implants, has underscored the evolving landscape of wear-resistant materials. The pivotal role of synovial uid and the potential of biomimetic approaches have been explored in the realm of lubrication strategies. The discussion on surface coatings for wear resistance, encompassing hydroxyapatite, diamond-like carbon, and nano­composite coatings, has elucidated the wealth of options available to mitigate wear. Further, the review has delved into experimental methodologies like pin-on-disk testing and tribo-corrosion testing, showcasing the diverse tools researchers wield to understand wear and friction mechanisms. Notably, exploring future directions, including additive manufacturing for custom implants and the integration of smart implants, has offered a glimpse into the potential of emerging technologies to revo­lutionize prosthetic wear performance.
Overall, this review has delineated the multifaceted realm of wear and friction mechanisms in knee and hip rehabilitation, underscoring the critical importance of interdisciplinary research in optimizing prosthetic performance. Future research should bridge the gaps identied in this review, focusing on unexplored facets like patient-specic considerations and the long-term performance of emerging materi­als and technologies. By fostering collaborations between clinicians, material scien­tists, and engineers, the eld can advance toward the ultimate goal of enhancing the longevity and functionality of prosthetic implants, thereby signicantly improving the quality of life for millions worldwide.
420
A. Choudhari et al.

References

1. Gomez, P.F. and J.A.Morcuende, Early attempts at hip arthroplasty: 1700s to 1950s. The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2005. 25: p.25.
2. McMaster, W.C., Early Development of Total Hip Arthroplasty. Modern Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty: From Primary to Complex, 2014: p.1.
3. That, S.D. and H.A.C.Hip, The History of Pediatric Hip Surgery: The Past 100 Years. The Pediatric and Adolescent Hip: Essentials and Evidence, 2019: p.1.
4. ThompsoN, F.R., An essay on the development of arthroplasty of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976–2007), 1966. 44: p.73–82.
5. Affatato, S., etal., Short history of biomaterials used in hip arthroplasty and their mod­ern evolution. Biomaterials in Clinical Practice: Advances in Clinical Research and Medical Devices, 2018: p.1–21.
6. Aufa, A.N., M.Z.Hassan, and Z.Ismail, Recent advances in Ti-6Al-4V additively manufac­tured by selective laser melting for biomedical implants: Prospect development. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2022. 896: p.163072.
7. Radin, E.L., Biomechanics of the human hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®,
1980. 152: p.28–34.
8. Ballis, R., B.H.Shabani, and D.Bytyqi, Anatomy of the Hip, in Atlas of Orthopaedic Surgical Approaches to the Lower Limbs. 2022, Springer. p.3–10.
9. Foran, J.R.H., Osteoarthritis of the Hip. 2021, Osteoarthritis of the Hip: https://orthoinfo.
aaos.org/en/diseases%2D%2Dconditions/osteoarthritis- of- the- hip/#:~:text=In%20 osteoarthritis%2C%20the%20cartilage%20in,in%20bone%20rubbing%20on%20bone.
10. National Academies of Sciences, E.a.M., Musculoskeletal Disorders, in Selected Health Conditions and Likelihood of Improvement with Treatment. 2020, National Academies Press (US).
11. Krishnan, Y. and A.J.Grodzinsky, Cartilage diseases. Matrix Biology, 2018. 71: p.51–69.
12. Salari, P. and A. Baldini, Revision knee surgery: the practical approach. EFORT Open Reviews, 2021. 6(6): p.495–500.
13. Falls, W.M. and G.A. Shafer-Crane, HIP AND PELVIS. Principles of Manual Sports Medicine, 2005: p.340.
14. Bragdon, C.R., etal., A new pin-on-disk wear testing method for simulating wear of poly­ethylene on cobalt-chrome alloy in total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 2001. 16(5): p.658–665.
15. Harris, W.H. and C.B.Sledge, Total hip and total knee replacement. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990. 323(11): p.725–731.
16. Ghalme, S.G., A. Mankar, and Y. Bhalerao, Biomaterials in hip joint replacement. Int. J.Mater. Sci. Eng, 2016. 4(2): p.113–125.
17. Aherwar, A., A.K.Singh, and A.Patnaik, Cobalt Based Alloy: A Better Choice Biomaterial for Hip Implants. Trends in Biomaterials & Articial Organs, 2016. 30(1).
18. Lopes, D.S., etal., The hip joint as an egg shape: a comprehensive study of femoral and acetabular morphologies. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization, 2020. 8(4): p.411–425.
19. Murphy, N.J., J.P.Eyles, and D.J.Hunter, Hip osteoarthritis: etiopathogenesis and implica­tions for management. Advances in therapy, 2016. 33: p.1921–1946.
20. Jazrawi, L.M., etal., Catastrophic failure of a cemented, collarless, polished, tapered cobalt­chromium femoral stem used with impaction bone-grafting. A report of two cases. JBJS,
1999. 81(6): p.844–7.
21. Lowe, C.J.M., etal., Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bmj,
2007. 335(7624): p.812.
22. Hsu, J.-T., etal., The number of screws, bone quality, and friction coefcient affect acetabular cup stability. Medical engineering & physics, 2007. 29(10): p.1089–1095.
13 Wear andFriction Mechanism Study inKnee andHip Rehabilitation
23. Weisse, B., etal., Inuence of contaminants in the stem—ball interface on the static fracture load of ceramic hip joint ball heads. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2008. 222(5): p.829–835.
24. Gupta, A.K., etal., Laser irradiation-induced nanoscale surface transformations in strontium titanate. Crystals, 2022. 12(5): p.624.
25. Gupta, A.K., S.Gupta, and R.Sachan, Laser irradiation induced atomic structure modica­tions in strontium titanate. Jom, 2022. 74: p.143–150.
26. Derar, H. and M.Shahinpoor, Recent patents and designs on hip replacement prostheses. The open biomedical engineering journal, 2015. 9: p.92.
27. Orthopaedic, Q., KNEE REPLACEMENT. Quillorthopaedic: https://quillorthopaedic.com/
doctors- advice- knee- replacement/.
28. Ondrésik, M., J.M.Oliveira, and R.L.Reis, Knee articular cartilage. Regenerative Strategies for the Treatment of Knee Joint Disabilities, 2017: p.3–20.
29. Samitier, G., etal., Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Archives of bone and joint surgery, 2015. 3(4): p.220.
30. Foran, J.R.H. 2020, OrthoInfo: https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/treatment/total- knee- replacement/.
31. Ma, C.B., Knee joint replacement. 2022, medlineplus.gov: https://medlineplus.gov/ency/
article/002974.htm.
32. Fukuda, H., Additive manufacturing technology for orthopedic implants. Advances in Metallic Biomaterials: Processing and Applications, 2015: p.3–26.
33. Fawsitt, C.G., etal., Choice of prosthetic implant combinations in total hip replacement: cost-effectiveness analysis using UK and Swedish hip joint registries data. Value in Health,
2019. 22(3): p.303–312.
34. Ciapetti, G., Biology of implant wear, in Wear of Orthopaedic Implants and Articial Joints. 2013, Elsevier. p.27–55.
35. Jones, D.L., etal., Update on hip and knee arthroplasty: current state of evidence. Arthritis Care & Research, 2005. 53(5): p.772–780.
36. Nine, M.J., etal., Wear debris characterization and corresponding biological response: arti­cial hip and knee joints. Materials, 2014. 7(2): p.980–1016.
37. Martinez-Marquez, D., etal., Quality by Design for industry translation: Three-dimensional risk assessment failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis for additively manufactured patient-specic implants. Engineering Reports, 2020. 2(1): p. e12113.
38. Thayaparan, G.K., etal., Patient-specic implants for craniomaxillofacial surgery: A manu­facturer's experience. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 2021. 66: p.102420.
39. Allum, S.R., R.A.Tomlinson, and R.Joshi, The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study. Clinical oral implants research,
2008. 19(6): p.553–559.
40. Newman, K.J., Total hip and knee replacements: a survey of 261 hospitals in England. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1993. 86(9): p.527.
41. Kremers, H.M., etal., Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2015. 97(17): p.1386.
42. Quintana, J.M., etal., Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of knee or hip joint replacement. Archives of internal medicine, 2006. 166(2): p.220–226.
43. Quintana, J.M., et al., Prevalence of knee and hip osteoarthritis and the appropriateness of joint replacement in an older population. Archives of internal medicine, 2008. 168(14): p.1576–1584.
44. Espehaug, B., etal., The type of cement and failure of total hip replacements. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume, 2002. 84(6): p.832–838.
45. Di Puccio, F. and L.Mattei, Biotribology of articial hip joints. World journal of orthopedics,
2015. 6(1): p.77.
46. Subramanian, S.S. and M.MoongilpattiSengodan, Role of full length weight bearing radio­graph in assessing the alignment in total knee arthroplasty. IOSR J Dent Med Sci, 2016. 15(07): p.55–63.
421
422
47. Kohan, L., C.J.Field, and D.R.Kerr, Early complications of hip resurfacing. The Journal of arthroplasty, 2012. 27(6): p.997–1002.
48. Steinberg, J., etal., Effects of chronic cobalt and chromium exposure after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: an epigenome-wide association pilot study. Journal of Orthopaedic Research,
2017. 35(10): p.2323–2328.
49. Sarhadi, V.K., et al., Genetic alterations in periprosthetic soft-tissue masses from patients with metal-on-metal hip replacement. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2015. 781: p.1–6.
50. Holzwarth, U. and G.Cotogno, Total hip arthroplasty. Brussels: European Commission, 2012.
51. Knight, S.R., R.Aujla, and S.P.Biswas, Total Hip Arthroplasty-over 100 years of operative history. Orthopedic reviews, 2011. 3(2).
52. Dumbleton, J.H., The clinical signicance of wear in total hip and knee prostheses. Journal of biomaterials applications, 1988. 3(1): p.3–32.
53. Brockett, C., etal., Friction of total hip replacements with different bearings and loading con­ditions. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Ofcial Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials, 2007. 81(2): p.508–515.
54. Wilches, L.V., J.A.Uribe, and A.Toro, Wear of materials used for articial joints in total hip replacements. Wear, 2008. 265(1–2): p.143–149.
55. Rojek, J., J.J.Telega, and S.Stupkiewicz, Contact problems with frictioh, adhesion and wear in orthopaedic biomechanics. Part II-numerical implementation and application to implanted knee joints. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2001. 39(3): p.679–706.
56. Ateshian, G.A., V.C.Mow, and R.Huiskes, Friction, lubrication, and wear of articular car­tilage and diarthrodial joints. Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology, 2005. 3: p.447–494.
57. Noble, P.C., etal., Extraarticular abrasive wear in cemented and cementless total knee arthro­plasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 2003. 416: p.120–128.
58. Davidson, J.A., R.A. Poggie, and A.K. Mishra, Abrasive wear of ceramic, metal, and UHMWPE bearing surfaces from third-body bone, PMMA bone cement, and titanium debris. Bio-medical materials and engineering, 1994. 4(3): p.213–229.
59. Zietz, C., etal., Third-body abrasive wear of tibial polyethylene inserts combined with metal­lic and ceramic femoral components in a knee simulator study. The International journal of articial organs, 2013. 36(1): p.47–55.
60. Schmidt, H. and H.E. Exner, Wear, Corrosion and Fatigue Properties of Ion Implanted Titanium Alloy TÏ6A14V. International Journal of Materials Research, 1999. 90(8): p.594–601.
61. Rawal, B.R., A. Yadav, and V.Pare, Life estimation of knee joint prosthesis by combined effect of fatigue and wear. Procedia Technology, 2016. 23: p.60–67.
62. Teoh, S.H., Fatigue of biomaterials: a review. International journal of fatigue, 2000. 22(10): p.825–837.
63. McKellop, H.A., The lexicon of polyethylene wear in articial joints. Biomaterials, 2007. 28(34): p.5049–5057.
64. Mandal, S., etal., Laser-assisted nanofabrication of multielement complex oxide core–shell nanoparticles. Materials & Design, 2022. 220: p.110882.
65. Buford, A. and T.Goswami, Review of wear mechanisms in hip implants: Paper I–General. Materials & design, 2004. 25(5): p.385–393.
66. Walker, P.S., G.W.Blunn, and P.A.Lilley, Wear testing of materials and surfaces for total knee replacement. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: An Ofcial Journal of The Society for Biomaterials and The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, 1996. 33(3): p.159–175.
67. Rahaman, M.N., etal., Ceramics for prosthetic hip and knee joint replacement. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2007. 90(7): p.1965–1988.
A. Choudhari et al.
13 Wear andFriction Mechanism Study inKnee andHip Rehabilitation
68. Teeter, M.G., etal., Technique to quantify subsurface cracks in retrieved polyethylene com­ponents using micro-CT.Journal of long-term effects of medical implants, 2010. 20(1).
69. Merola, M. and S.Affatato, Materials for hip prostheses: a review of wear and loading con­siderations. Materials, 2019. 12(3): p.495.
70. Nasab, M.B., M.R.Hassan, and B.B.Sahari, Metallic biomaterials of knee and hip-a review. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs, 2010. 24(1): p.69–82.
71. Nag, S. and R.Banerjee, Fundamentals of medical implant materials. 2012.
72. Grupp, T.M., etal., Biotribology of alternative bearing materials for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta biomaterialia, 2010. 6(9): p.3601–3610.
73. Carr, B.C. and T.Goswami, Knee implants–Review of models and biomechanics. Materials & Design, 2009. 30(2): p.398–413.
74. Bahraminasab, M. and A. Jahan, Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR.Materials & Design, 2011. 32(8–9): p.4471–4477.
75. McKee, G.K. and J.Watson-Farrar, Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar pros­thesis. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume, 1966. 48(2): p.245–259.
76. Walker, P.S. and B.L.Gold, The tribology (friction, lubrication and wear) of all-metal arti­cial hip joints. Wear, 1971. 17(4): p.285–299.
77. Weber, B.G., Metall-Metall-Totalprothese des Hüftgelenkes: Zurück in die Zukunft. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete, 1992. 130(04): p.306–309.
78. Wimmer, M.A., etal., Wear mechanisms in metal-on-metal bearings: The importance of tri­bochemical reaction layers. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2010. 28(4): p.436–443.
79. Büscher, R., etal., Subsurface microstructure of metal-on-metal hip joints and its relation­ship to wear particle generation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Ofcial Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials, 2005. 72(1): p.206–214.
80. Wimmer, M.A., et al., The acting wear mechanisms on metal-on-metal hip joint bearings: invitro results. Wear, 2001. 250(1–12): p.129–139.
81. Wimmer, M.A., etal., Tribochemical reaction on metal-on-metal hip joint bearings: a com­parison between in-vitro and in-vivo results. Wear, 2003. 255(7–12): p.1007–1014.
82. Lin, J., etal., Novel Ti-Ta-Hf-Zr alloys with promising mechanical properties for prospective stent applications. Scientic reports, 2016. 6(1): p.37901.
83. Xu, Y., etal., A low-cost metastable beta Ti alloy with high elastic admissible strain and enhanced ductility for orthopaedic application. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2020. 835: p.155391.
84. Abd-elrhman, Y., etal., Compatibility assessment of new V-free low-cost Ti–4.7 Mo–4.5 Fe alloy for some biomedical applications. Materials & Design, 2016. 97: p.445–453.
85. Li, H.F., etal., Screening on binary Ti alloy with excellent mechanical property and castabil­ity for dental prosthesis application. Scientic Reports, 2016. 6(1): p.37428.
86. Biesiekierski, A., etal., An investigation of the mechanical and microstructural evolution of a TiNbZr alloy with varied ageing time. Scientic reports, 2018. 8(1): p.5737.
87. Burzlaff, A., etal., New studies on the invitro genotoxicity of sodium molybdate and their impact on the overall assessment of the genotoxicity of molybdenum substances. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2017. 86: p.279–291.
88. Schaller, K.H., Molybdenum and its compounds, except Molybdenum trioxide [BAT Value Documentation, 2010]. The MAK-Collection for Occupational Health and Safety: Annual Thresholds and Classications for the Workplace, 2002: p.110–113.
89. Sidhu, S.S., H.Singh, and M.A.-H.Gepreel, A review on alloy design, biological response, and strengthening of β-titanium alloys as biomaterials. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2021. 121: p.111661.
90. Chakraborty, S., etal., Studies on nano-metal dispersed Cu-Cr matrix composite. Materials Letters, 2019. 257: p.126739.
423
424
91. Roy, D., et al., Enhancement of properties of micro-alloyed Low-carbon Ni-added Steel by thermomechanical treatment. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2020. 29(12): p.7952–7963.
92. Chakraborty, S., etal., Nanomechanical properties of mechanically alloyed and spark plasma sintered W-nanoparticulate dispersed Cu-Nb alloys. Materials Letters, 2020. 274: p.128004.
93. Kaivosoja, E., etal., Materials used for hip and knee implants, in Wear of orthopaedic implants and articial joints. 2013, Elsevier. p.178–218.
94. Mandal, S., etal., Atomic-scale insights on large-mist heterointerfaces in LSMO/MgO/c- ­Al2O3. Crystals, 2021. 11(12): p.1493.
95. Amstutz, H.C., etal., Stem fracture incidence in Trapezoidal-28 stainless steel hip arthro­plasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 1990. 256: p.105–114.
96. Bronzino, J.D. and J.B.Park, Biomaterials: principles and applications. 2002: CRC Press.
97. Fujihara, K., etal., Performance study of braided carbon/PEEK composite compression bone plates. Biomaterials, 2003. 24(15): p.2661–2667.
98. Lewandowska-Szumieł, M., J.Komender, and J.Chłopek, Interaction between carbon com­posites and bone after intrabone implantation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: An Ofcial Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials, 1999. 48(3): p.289–296.
99. Bhat, S.V., Biomaterials. 2005: Alpha Science Int'l Ltd.
100. Chang, F.K., J.L.Perez, and J.A.Davidson, Stiffness and strength tailoring of a hip prosthe­sis made of advanced composite materials. Journal of biomedical materials research, 1990. 24(7): p.873–899.
101. Simoes, J.A., A.T.Marques, and G.Jeronimidis, Design of a controlled-stiffness composite proximal femoral prosthesis. Composites Science and Technology, 2000. 60(4): p.559–567.
102. Cales, B., Zirconia as a sliding material: histologic, laboratory, and clinical data. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976–2007), 2000. 379: p.94–112.
103. Mandal, S., etal., Understanding non-stochiometric deposition of multi-principal elemental NiCoCr thin lms. Applied Surface Science, 2023. 623: p.157011.
104. Gupta, A.K., B.Mallik, and D.Roy, Structure Property Correlation of In Situ Reinforced Al–Based Metal Matrix Composite via Stir Casting. Mater. Perform. Charact., 2020. 9(1): p.25–35.
105. Roy, D., etal., Stable nanocrystalline structure attainment and strength enhancement of Cu base alloy using bi-modal distributed tungsten dispersoids. Philosophical Magazine, 2022. 102(3): p.189–209.
106. Heisel, C., M.Silva, and T.P.Schmalzried, Bearing surface options for total hip replacement in young patients. Instructional course lectures, 2004. 53: p.49–65.
107. Galante, J.O., Rostoker, W.: Wear in total hip prosthesis. Acta orthop, scand., Suppl, 1973. 145.
108. Leslie, I., etal., Effect of bearing size on the long-term wear, wear debris, and ion levels of large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements—An invitro study. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Ofcial Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials, 2008. 87(1): p.163–172.
109. Brockett, C.L., etal., The inuence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2008. 19: p.1575–1579.
110. Adluru, H.K., A Novel Hip Implant Using 3D Woven Composite Material–Design and Analysis. 2015.
111. Jung, T.K., etal. Fabrication of a high performance Ti alloy implant for an articial hip joint. Trans Tech Publ.
112. Jung, T.K., etal. Mechanical properties-graded Ti alloy implants for orthopedic applications. Trans Tech Publ.
A. Choudhari et al.
13 Wear andFriction Mechanism Study inKnee andHip Rehabilitation
113. Nuño, N., etal., Static coefcient of friction between Ti-6Al-4V and PMMA for cemented hip and knee implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: An Ofcial Journal of The Society for Biomaterials and The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, 2002. 59(1): p.191–200.
114. Geetha, M., etal., Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants–A review. Progress in materials science, 2009. 54(3): p.397–425.
115. Fokter, S.K., etal., Why do some titanium-alloy total hip arthroplasty modular necks fail? Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2017. 69: p.107–114.
116. Lim, S.-J., etal., Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 2015. 473: p.3781–3787.
117. Schroder, D., etal., Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: incidence of instability and noise. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 2011. 469: p.437–442.
118. Jin, W. and P.K.Chu, Orthopedic implants. Encyclopedia of biomedical engineering, 2019. 1(3): p.425–439.
119. Park, J.-W., et al., A 10-to 12-year follow-up study of delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023: p.1–10.
120. Abitha, H., etal., A recent investigation on shape memory alloys and polymers based mate­rials on bio articial implants-hip and knee joint. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020. 33: p.4458–4466.
121. Tienen, T.G., etal., Replacement of the knee meniscus by a porous polymer implant: a study in dogs. The American journal of sports medicine, 2006. 34(1): p.64–71.
122. De Santis, R., L. Ambrosio, and L. Nicolais, Polymer-based composite hip prostheses. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 2000. 79(1–4): p.97–102.
123. Ishihara, K., Highly lubricated polymer interfaces for advanced articial hip joints through biomimetic design. Polymer Journal, 2015. 47(9): p.585–597.
124. Shekhawat, D., etal. A short review on polymer, metal and ceramic based implant materials. IOP Publishing.
125. Okolie, O., etal., 3D printing for hip implant applications: a review. Polymers, 2020. 12(11): p.2682.
126. Li, C.S., et al., The use of carbon-ber-reinforced (CFR) PEEK material in orthopedic implants: a systematic review. Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2015. 8: p. CMAMD-S20354.
127. Bennett, D.B., etal., Metal-carbon ber composite femoral stems in hip replacements: a ran­domized controlled parallel-group study with mean ten-year follow-up. JBJS, 2014. 96(24): p.2062–2069.
128. Bougherara, H., et al., A preliminary biomechanical study of a novel carbon–bre hip implant versus standard metallic hip implants. Medical engineering & physics, 2011. 33(1): p.121–128.
129. Rezaei, F., etal., Carbon/PEEK composite materials as an alternative for stainless steel/tita­nium hip prosthesis: a nite element study. Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine, 2015. 38: p.569–580.
130. Pramanik, A., etal., Joining of carbon bre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites and alu­minium alloys–A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2017. 101: p.1–29.
131. Ghosh, A.K. and M. Dwivedi, Advantages and applications of polymeric composites. Processability of polymeric composites, 2020: p.29–57.
132. Wei, Y. and S.A.Hadigheh, Cost benet and life cycle analysis of CFRP and GFRP waste treatment methods. Construction and Building Materials, 2022. 348: p.128654.
133. Sze, J.Y., Plasma immersion ion implantation on polymers. 2007.
134. Bowsher, J.G., etal., Effect of ion implantation on the tribology of metal-on-metal hip pros­theses. The Journal of arthroplasty, 2004. 19(8): p.107–111.
135. Österle, W., etal., Potential of wear resistant coatings on Ti–6Al–4V for articial hip joint bearing surfaces. Wear, 2008. 264(7–8): p.505–517.
425
426
136. Gupta, A.K., etal., 3 Twin Boundaries in Gd2Ti2O7 Pyrochlore: Pathways for Oxygen Migration. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020. 12(40): p.45558–45563.
137. Kyomoto, M., et al., Biomimetic hydration lubrication with various polyelectrolyte lay­ers on cross-linked polyethylene orthopedic bearing materials. Biomaterials, 2012. 33(18): p.4451–4459.
138. Khanna, R., etal., Progress in wear resistant materials for total hip arthroplasty. Coatings,
2017. 7(7): p.99.
139. Zhang, S.-L., etal., Effects of exercise therapy on knee joint function and synovial uid cytokine levels in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Molecular medicine reports, 2013. 7(1): p.183–186.
140. Koh, S.M., etal., Elevated plasma and synovial uid interleukin-8 and interleukin-18 may be associated with the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis. The Knee, 2020. 27(1): p.26–35.
141. Pagura, S.M.C., etal., Circulating and synovial levels of IGF-I, cytokines, physical function and anthropometry differ in women awaiting total knee arthroplasty when compared to men. Journal of orthopaedic research, 2005. 23(2): p.397–405.
142. Mattei, L., etal., Lubrication and wear modelling of articial hip joints: A review. Tribology International, 2011. 44(5): p.532–549.
143. Ruggiero, A. and A.Sicilia, A mixed elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication model for wear calcu­lation in articial hip joints. Lubricants, 2020. 8(7): p.72.
144. Murakami, T., Importance of adaptive multimode lubrication mechanism in natural and articial joints. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 2012. 226(10): p.827–837.
145. Crockett, R., Boundary lubrication in natural articular joints. Tribology Letters, 2009. 35(2): p.77–84.
146. Gale, L.R., Biotribological assessment for articial synovial joints: the role of boundary lubrication. 2007.
147. Wang, F.C. and Z.M.Jin, Elastohydrodynamic lubrication modeling of articial hip joints under steady-state conditions. 2005.
148. Neville, A., et al., Synovial joint lubrication—does nature teach more effective engineer­ing lubrication strategies? Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2007. 221(10): p.1223–1230.
149. Dowson, D., etal., Design considerations for cushion form bearings in articial hip joints. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1991. 205(2): p.59–68.
150. Jin, Z.M., J.Fisher, and E.Ingham, Biotribology: material design, lubrication, and wear in articial hip joints. Handbook of lubrication and tribology, 2006. 1: p.2006.
151. Ahlroos, T., Effect of lubricant on the wear of prosthetic joint materials. 2001: Helsinki University of Technology.
152. Pezzotti, G. and K.Yamamoto, Articial hip joints: The biomaterials challenge. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2014. 31: p.3–20.
153. Jahn, S., J.Seror, and J.Klein, Lubrication of articular cartilage. Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2016. 18: p.235–258.
154. Bhatt, H. and T. Goswami, Implant wear mechanisms—basic approach. Biomedical Materials, 2008. 3(4): p.042001.
155. Astephen, J.L., etal., Biomechanical changes at the hip, knee, and ankle joints during gait are associated with knee osteoarthritis severity. Journal of orthopaedic research, 2008. 26(3): p.332–341.
156. Roman, M.D., etal., Assesment of synovial uid pH in osteoarthritis of the HIP and knee. Rev. Chim, 2017. 68(6): p.1242–1244.
157. Sullivan, S.J.L. and L.D.T.Topoleski, Surface modications for improved wear performance in articial joints: a review. Jom, 2015. 67: p.2502–2517.
158. Epinette, J.-A. and M.T. Manley, Fifteen years of clinical experience with hydroxyapatite coatings in joint arthroplasty. 2003: Springer Science & Business Media.
A. Choudhari et al.