Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5361_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Aim and Scope
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •About the Editors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2.1 Friction
- •1.2.1.3 Friction Under Lubricated Conditions
- •1.7.1 Joint Tribology
- •1.7.2 Skin Tribology
- •1.7.3 Oral Tribology
- •1.8 Summary
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.3.1 Fluid Pressurization/Fluid-Film Lubrication
- •2.3.2 Boundary Lubrication
- •2.3.3 Hydrodynamic Lubrication
- •2.3.4 Squeeze-Film Lubrication
- •2.3.5 Synovial Fluid
- •2.3.6 Hydration Lubrication
- •2.5.2 Scaffolds
- •2.5.3 Synthetic Polymer
- •2.5.4 Polyacrylamide
- •2.5.5 PEG Hydrogel
- •2.5.6 PVA Hydrogel
- •2.5.7 Double Network Hydrogel
- •2.5.8 Triple Network Hydrogel
- •2.6.1 Polyacrylamide
- •2.6.2 PEG Hydrogel
- •2.6.3 PVA Hydrogel
- •2.6.4 Double Network Hydrogel
- •2.6.5 Triple Network Hydrogel
- •2.7.1 Mechanical Properties
- •2.7.2 Structural Properties
- •2.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.3.1 Label-Based Biosensors
- •3.3.2 Label-Free Biosensors
- •3.4 Different Nanobiosensing Techniques
- •3.4.1 Optical Sensing
- •3.4.2 Electrochemical/Electrical Sensing
- •3.4.3 Magnetic Sensing
- •3.4.4 Mass-Based Sensing
- •3.6.2 Neurodegenerative Diseases
- •3.6.3 Infectious Diseases
- •3.6.4 Metabolic Diseases
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2.1 Surface Functionalization
- •4.2.2 Bioconjugation
- •4.3 Synthesis Approach
- •4.3.1 Hydrothermal Method
- •4.3.2 Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD)
- •4.3.3 Wet Chemical Method
- •4.4 Plasmonic Black Bodies (PBBs)
- •4.4.1 Gold NP (AuNPs)-Based PBB
- •4.4.2 Silver NPs (Ag NPs)-Based PBB
- •4.4.3 Platinum NPs (Pt NPs)-Based PBB
- •4.5 Biomimetic NP
- •4.6 Upconverting NP (UCNP)
- •4.6.1 Synthesis
- •4.7 Inorganic NP
- •4.7.1 Synthesis
- •4.8 Photothermal Therapy (PTT)
- •4.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Human Skin
- •5.10 Future Scope
- •5.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.1.1 Class 1
- •6.1.2 Class 2
- •6.1.3 Class 3
- •6.4.1.1 Surface Patterning
- •6.4.1.2 Direct-Write Patterning
- •6.4.1.5 Dip-Pen Nanotechnology
- •6.4.1.7 Composing Using Beams
- •6.4.1.8 Direct Write Photolithography (DWP)
- •6.4.1.9 Light-Beam Lithography Electron
- •6.4.1.10 Focused Ion Beam Lithography
- •6.4.2 Fabrication Techniques
- •6.4.2.4 Non-invasive Glucose Monitoring Devices Technique
- •6.4.2.6 Cost-Effective Electrochemical Voltametric Sensors Techniques
- •6.4.2.7 Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Techniques
- •6.4.2.8 UV-LED Stereolithography Printer Technique
- •6.4.2.9 4D Printing Techniques
- •6.4.2.10 Advanced Biomedical Techniques Involving Biorobots
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.6 Mechanical Biocompatibility Challenges
- •7.7 Poor Bio-Printing Resolution
- •7.9 Limited Biomaterial Selection
- •7.11 Conclusion
- •8.2 Animal Tribology
- •8.2.1 Joint
- •8.2.3 Integumentary Change
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.3.1 Nanotribology
- •8.4 Green Tribology
- •8.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Bio-Tribological Issues
- •9.3.2 Bone Fracture Fixation
- •9.3.4 Cardiovascular Devices
- •9.3.5 Minimal Invasive Surgical Devices
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2.2.1 Structural Integrity
- •10.2.2.2 Controlled Release Properties
- •10.2.2.3 Enhanced Drug Loading Capacity
- •10.2.2.4 Tailored Material Properties
- •10.2.3.1 Biocompatibility
- •10.2.3.3 Mechanical Properties
- •10.2.3.4 Drug Compatibility
- •10.2.3.5 Fabrication Compatibility
- •10.3.1 Matrix Material Properties
- •10.3.4 Biocompatibility Assessment
- •10.3.4.1 In Vitro Cell Culture Studies
- •10.3.4.2 Hemocompatibility Studies
- •10.3.4.3 In Vivo Animal Studies
- •10.3.4.4 Histological Analysis
- •10.3.4.5 Immune Response Evaluation
- •10.3.4.6 Biodegradation Assessment
- •10.4 Surface Engineering Considerations
- •10.4.2.1 Surface Coatings
- •10.4.2.2 Plasma Treatment
- •10.4.2.3 Surface Grafting
- •10.4.2.4 Dip Coating
- •10.4.2.5 Spray Coating System
- •10.4.2.6 Electrotreated Coating
- •10.4.2.9 Microfabrication Techniques
- •10.4.2.10 Surface Roughness Control
- •10.5.1.2 Mechanical Properties
- •10.5.1.3 Surface Characteristics
- •10.5.1.4 Release Kinetics Analysis
- •10.5.1.5 Biological Compatibility
- •10.5.1.7 Other Analyses
- •10.6 Advanced Fabrication Techniques
- •10.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Shape Memory Alloys (SMA)
- •11.3 Shape Memory Polymers
- •11.3.1 Heat
- •11.3.2 Light
- •11.3.3 Magnetic Field
- •11.4 Shape-Changing Hydrogels
- •11.5 Biomedical Applications
- •11.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.3 Bioresorbable Orthopedic Implants
- •12.4.1 Polylactides
- •12.4.2 Poly (Ortho Esters)
- •12.4.3 Polyphosphoesters
- •12.4.4 Polyphosphazenes
- •12.4.5 Polycaprolactone
- •12.4.6 Polyurethanes
- •12.4.7 Polycarbonates
- •12.5.1 Compression Molding
- •12.5.2 Transfer Molding
- •12.5.3 Injection Molding
- •12.5.4 Extrusion
- •12.5.5 Blow Molding
- •12.5.6 Calendering Process
- •12.5.7 Fiber Spinning
- •12.5.8 Thermoforming
- •12.5.9 Polymer Foaming
- •12.7 Challenges
- •12.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.3.1.1 Total Hip Replacement (THR)
- •13.3.2 Resurfacing Hip Replacement (RHR)
- •13.5.1 Adhesive Wear
- •13.5.2 Abrasive Wear
- •13.5.3 Fatigue Wear
- •13.5.4 Corrosion/Oxidative Wear
- •13.5.5 Surface Cracking
- •13.6.1 Metallic Implants
- •13.6.1.1 Stainless Steel
- •13.6.1.2 Co-Cr Alloys
- •13.6.1.3 Ti-Alloy
- •13.6.2 Ceramic Implants
- •13.6.3 Polymer Implants
- •13.6.4 Composite Implants
- •13.6.5.2 Surface Coatings
- •13.7.2.1 Hydrodynamic Lubrication
- •13.7.2.2 Boundary Lubrication
- •13.7.2.3 Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
- •13.7.3 Biomimetic Lubrication Approaches
- •13.7.3.1 Replicating Natural Lubrication Mechanisms
- •13.7.4.1 Implant Wear
- •13.7.4.3 Synovial Fluid Degradation
- •13.8.1 Hydroxyapatite Coatings
- •13.8.1.1 Bone Integration
- •13.8.1.2 Implant Stability
- •13.8.1.4 Biocompatibility
- •13.8.2 Diamond-Like Carbon Coatings
- •13.8.3 Metal Nitride Coatings
- •13.8.4 Polymeric Coatings
- •13.8.5 Nanocomposite Coatings
- •13.9.1 Pin-on-Disk Testing
- •13.9.2 Hip Joint Simulators
- •13.9.3 Knee Joint Simulators
- •13.9.4 Tribo-Corrosion Testing
- •13.9.5 Wear Debris Analysis Techniques
- •13.9.5.1 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
- •13.9.5.2 Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS)
- •13.10.1.1 Tailored Geometries
- •13.10.1.2 Improved Wear Characteristics
- •13.10.1.3 Accelerated Innovation
- •13.10.2.1 Real-Time Wear Monitoring
- •13.10.2.2 Functionality Assessment
- •13.10.2.3 Implant Status Monitoring
- •13.10.2.4 Patient-Centric Healthcare
- •13.10.3.1 Advanced Biomaterials
- •13.10.3.4 Multidisciplinary Approaches
- •13.10.4.1 Wear Data Analysis
- •13.10.4.2 Predictive Wear Patterns
- •13.10.4.3 Early Intervention Strategies
- •13.10.4.4 Personalized Treatment Plans
- •13.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2.1 Powder Bed Fusion (PBF)
- •14.2.2 Directed Energy Deposition
- •14.3.1 Extrusion-Based AM
- •14.5 Biomanufacturing
- •14.5.1 Tissue Engineering
- •14.5.2 Organ-on-a-Chip Models
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index

12
A. Kumar et al.
• Surface Tension: This phenomenon arises from the cohesive forces between mol-
ecules at the surface of a liquid, minimizing its surface area and leading to effects
like water droplets forming spheres.
• Capillary Action: Cohesion forces pulling water molecules together can draw
them up narrow tubes against gravity, enabling phenomena like water rising in
straws or sap ascent in plants.
Impact of Cohesion in Everyday Life
• Material Properties: Cohesion determines the strength, elasticity, and integrity of
various materials. From the robust structure of metals to the exibility of poly-
mers, cohesion plays a crucial role.
• Biological Systems: Cell membranes, blood viscosity, and even protein folding
rely on various types of cohesive forces to maintain structure and function within
living organisms.
From Principles to Applications
Understanding the principles of adhesion and cohesion holds immense signicance
across various elds:
• Material Science: By manipulating adhesion and cohesion forces, scientists
design materials with tailored properties for adhesives, coatings, and composites.
• Nanotechnology: Controlling interaction forces at the nanoscale is crucial for
manipulating nanoparticles and fabricating advanced materials.
• Biomedical Engineering: Biocompatible materials for implants or drug delivery
systems require careful consideration of adhesion and cohesion forces for opti-
mal functionality.
Conclusion
Delving into the world of adhesion and cohesion reveals a hidden language of forces
shaping our physical world and biological systems. By understanding these principles, we unlock the potential for innovations in diverse elds, from creating stronger
adhesives to understanding the intricate workings of life itself. So, the next time you
marvel at a raindrop clinging to a leaf or witness the strength of a spider’s web,
remember the invisible forces of adhesion and cohesion at play, silently shaping the
world around us.
1.5 Contact Mechanics inBiotribology
Biotribology, the fascinating science of surface interactions in living organisms,
extends beyond simply observing movement and wear. Understanding the mechanics at the point of contact, where surfaces interact and forces are distributed, is
crucial for unraveling the secrets of biological tribology.

1 Introduction toBiotribology: AScience ofSurface Interaction
13
Forces at Play
Understanding contact mechanics necessitates considering the various forces inuencing interacting surfaces:
• Normal Force: This perpendicular force presses surfaces together, impacting
friction and wear. In joints, cartilage compression plays a vital role in load distri-
bution and lubrication.
• Tangential Force: This parallel force causes sliding or rolling, leading to friction
and potentially, wear. Muscles generate these forces in joints, and biotribology
investigates how organisms minimize their detrimental effects.
• Adhesive Forces: These attractive forces between surfaces, arising from van der
Waals, electrostatic, or other interactions, can contribute to friction and inuence
wear behavior.
Contact Geometries
The shape and size of interacting surfaces signicantly impact contact mechanics:
• Conformity: When surfaces perfectly match, contact occurs over a wider area,
distributing forces and lowering stress. Joint cartilage exhibits some degree of
conformity for smoother articulation.
• Non-conformity: When surfaces have different shapes, contact concentrates at
smaller areas, potentially leading to higher stress and wear. Teeth interacting
with food exemplify this scenario.
Material Properties
The behavior of contacting surfaces depends on their material properties:
• Stiffness and Elasticity: Rigid materials deform less under load, leading to higher
contact stresses. Cartilage exhibits a unique stiffness gradient to optimize load
distribution and wear resistance.
• Damping and Energy Absorption: Materials that dissipate energy effectively
through internal friction can minimize wear. Synovial uid and soft tissues play
this role in biological systems.
Contact Models
Researchers utilize various analytical and numerical models to simulate and predict
contact mechanics in biotribology:
• Hertzian Contact: This classical model applies to smooth, elastic spheres under
normal loading, providing insights into joint contact mechanics.
• Asperity Contact: This model considers surface roughness and the interaction of
individual asperities, offering a more realistic view of contact in non-ideal
geometries.
• Finite Element Analysis (FEA): This powerful numerical technique simulates
complex geometries and material properties, providing detailed insights into
stress distribution and wear prediction.

14
A. Kumar et al.
Impact on Tribological Phenomena
Understanding contact mechanics plays a crucial role in comprehending biotribological phenomena:
• Friction Reduction: By optimizing contact area, material properties, and lubrica-
tion, organisms minimize friction in joints, teeth, and other interfaces.
• Wear Resistance: Understanding stress distribution and wear mechanisms helps
design biocompatible implants that resist wear and improve longevity.
• Lubrication Optimization: Studying how lubricants interact with surfaces under
varying contact conditions leads to developing more effective biolubricants for
joints and other applications.
From Understanding to Innovation
Delving into contact mechanics empowers biotribologists to:
• Develop wear-resistant implants that mimic the stress distribution and lubrica-
tion strategies of natural joints.
• Design self-lubricating surfaces inspired by nature’s solutions, reducing friction
and wear in diverse applications.
• Enhance our understanding of biological systems, from joint health to cell adhe-
sion, by considering the intricate play of forces at the contact level.
Conclusion
Contact mechanics forms the foundation of understanding how surfaces interact and
behave in biotribology. By unraveling the intricate interplay of forces, geometries,
and material properties, we unlock the secrets of nature’s remarkable tribological
adaptations. This knowledge fuels innovation in various elds, paving the way for a
future where we can learn from and mimic nature’s ingenuity to solve tribological
challenges in medicine, engineering, and beyond.
1.6 Biological Aspects inBiotribology
Biotribology, the intricate dance between biology and surface interactions, transcends mere observation. It delves into the diverse biological aspects present in
living organisms, from the microscopic world of microorganisms to the metabolic
intricacies of the host, unlocking fascinating insights into tribological phenomena.
In this exploration, we’ll focus on microorganisms, host metabolism, and targeting
strategies, revealing their profound impact on biological interfaces.
Microbial Inuences
• Biolms: These communities of microorganisms adhering to surfaces play a cru-
cial role in biotribology. They can increase friction and wear in joints, dental
implants, and medical devices. Biotribology investigates biolm formation,
composition, and removal strategies to minimize detrimental effects.

1 Introduction toBiotribology: AScience ofSurface Interaction
15
• Tribocorrosion: The combined action of wear and microbial corrosion can sig-
nicantly damage implants and medical devices. Understanding how microor-
ganisms interact with worn surfaces and contribute to corrosion is crucial for
improving device longevity.
• Lubrication: Certain microorganisms produce lubricants that can reduce friction
in biological systems. Studying these natural lubricants could inspire the devel-
opment of novel biocompatible lubricants for various applications.
Host Metabolism
• Nutrient Availability: The availability of nutrients and metabolites can inuence
lubrication production, surface properties, and wear resistance in biological
interfaces. Biotribology explores how metabolic pathways and nutrient supply
impact tribological performance.
• Inammation: Inammatory responses to foreign materials or wear debris can
signicantly increase friction and wear. Understanding the link between inam-
mation and tribology helps design implants and materials that minimize inam-
matory reactions.
• Signaling Pathways: Biological signaling pathways regulate various processes
impacting tribology, including lubrication production, cell adhesion, and tissue
repair. Biotribology investigates these pathways to identify potential targets for
therapeutic interventions or material design.
Targeting Strategies
• Antimicrobial Coatings: These coatings aim to prevent biolm formation on
implants and medical devices, reducing friction, wear, and the risk of infection.
Biotribology informs the development of effective and biocompatible antimicro-
bial coatings.
• Anti-inammatory Materials: Modifying materials to suppress inammatory
responses can minimize wear and improve implant integration. Biotribology
research guides the design of such materials with optimized surface properties.
• Modulating Metabolic Pathways: By understanding how specic metabolic
pathways inuence tribological processes, researchers can develop strategies to
modulate them for therapeutic or material design purposes.
GM Targeting Strategies
• Genetically Modied Microorganisms (GMs): Engineering microorganisms to
produce specic lubricants or degrade biolms shows promise for mitigating
tribological challenges. However, ethical considerations and potential unin-
tended consequences demand careful evaluation.
• Gene Editing for Host Modulation: Precisely editing genes in the host organism
to optimize lubrication production, reduce inammation, or enhance tissue repair
could improve tribological outcomes. However, ethical and safety concerns sur-
rounding gene editing technologies need to be addressed.

16
A. Kumar et al.
1.7 Recent Advancements inBiotribology
1.7.1 Joint Tribology
Natural Synovial Joints
The human musculoskeletal system’s (MSK) ability to facilitate movement during
daily activities signicantly impacts quality of life. Within the MSK system, synovial joints like the hip and knee act as remarkable biological bearings. Functioning
throughout a lifetime, these joints endure signicant dynamic loads while enabling
a diverse range of motions. However, diseases such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid
arthritis, and trauma can necessitate replacing these natural bearings with articial
alternatives. Globally, well over one million joint replacements occur annually.
Tribological principles are crucial in understanding the function, failure, and
design of both natural and articial joints. Tribological studies of these joints typically focus on friction, wear, and lubrication, with due consideration given to the
biological aspects of the joint system (Table1.1). Friction studies aim to elucidate
underlying tribological mechanisms, while lubrication analysis and modeling provide further insights. Wear studies are generally most critical, directly impacting the
longevity of both natural and replaced joints. However, their time-consuming and
expensive nature necessitates supplementation by friction and lubrication studies.
While experimental approaches are prevalent in such tribological studies, alternative analytical and computational methods are equally valuable. Ideally, tribological investigations of natural and articial synovial joints should integrate
considerations of friction, wear, and lubrication, utilizing both experimental and
computational approaches. Additionally, recognizing the biological aspects of joints
is crucial. For instance, wear debris from joint implants can trigger adverse tissue
reactions, and analyses of retrieved failed implants can offer valuable insights into
the underlying failure mechanisms.
Table 1.1 Lubrication mechanisms in articular cartilage
Material Methodology Key ndings References
Articular
cartilage
Articular
cartilage
Articular
cartilage
Articular
cartilage
Articular
cartilage
Articular
cartilage
Review Lubrication mechanisms include boundary
lubrication, uid-lm lubrication, and weeping
lubrication.
Review Interstitial uid pressurization plays a crucial role
in lubrication.
Review Lubricin, a boundary lubricant, contributes to low
friction coefcients.
In vitro
experiments
Finite element
modeling
Finite element
modeling
Friction behavior depends on loading conditions,
lubricant type, and contact time.
Biphasic poroelastic models can predict
lubrication behavior under complex loading
conditions.
Cartilage properties and joint geometry inuence
uid pressurization and contact mechanics.
[23–27]
[28–32]
[33, 34]
[31, 32,
35–37]
[38–42]
[39–41]

1 Introduction toBiotribology: AScience ofSurface Interaction
17
Natural synovial joints exemplify remarkable tribological systems. Their bearing
surfaces consist of articular cartilage, lubricated by synovial uid. Articular cartilage is characterized by its unique biphasic nature, comprising both solid elements
(including collagen bers and proteoglycan-rich ground substance) and uid phases.
Understanding these unique biphasic properties is crucial for elucidating the lubrication mechanisms within the synovial joint. Additionally, synovial uid contributes its own vital constituents, like hyaluronic acid and lubricin, both signicant for
joint lubrication. Finally, the dynamic mechanical environment generated by load
and speed also plays a critical role in shaping the tribological mechanisms at play.
Articial Replacements
Articial joints offer a critical treatment option for joint diseases like osteoarthritis
and trauma. Optimizing the performance of these man-made bearings through friction, lubrication, and wear studies remains crucial for improved clinical outcomes.
Unfortunately, a major clinical challenge associated with articial joints is the loosening of prosthetic components, often stemming from adverse biological reactions
triggered by wear debris. This debris primarily originates from the articulating surfaces and xation interfaces (within biomaterial connections or between biomaterial
and bone). Additionally, corrosion can lead to the release of metallic ions. These
factors collectively contribute to potential bone loss, osteolysis, and pseudotumor
formation through adverse biological reactions.
Further complicating matters, patient-specic anatomical variations, loading/
motion patterns, and surgical techniques signicantly impact how the joint implant
functions within the body. Consequently, integrating tribological studies with biological and clinical investigations of articial joints becomes paramount.
To address wear and wear debris generation, research efforts have explored various biomaterial combinations (Table1.2). Currently, most articial joints utilize a
combination of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) against a
cobalt-chromium counterpart for both hip and knee replacements.
Several critical factors have been identied as contributing to wear in articial
joints, primarily categorized into bearing material combinations, implant design,
and patient/surgical variables. Among these, the choice of bearing materials exerts
the most signicant inuence on wear performance.
Highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)
paired with either metallic or ceramic counterfaces has demonstrated a substantial
reduction in wear volume when compared to conventional UHMWPE, with laboratory and retrieved implant analyses revealing a potential wear reduction of 60–80%.
Ceramic counterfaces, due to their smoother surfaces and superior abrasion resistance, can further decrease wear compared to metallic options. Notably, ceramicon- ceramic pairings achieve the lowest wear rates among clinically used material
combinations, especially when utilizing zirconia-toughened alumina ceramics.
Metal-on-metal bearing surfaces can also exhibit low wear, but only under optimal lubrication conditions where contact primarily occurs within the metallic cup.
Adverse lubrication scenarios, such as those arising from an overly vertical cup
position, micro-separation, or edge contact occurring at the metallic cup, have been

18
Table 1.2 Lubrication and wear in articial joints
Material Methodology Key ndings References
UHMWPE In vitro
experiments
Ceramic &
Metal-on-PE
Various bearing
surfaces
Total articial
joints
Articial hip
joints
Total joint
replacement
Alternative
bearings
Total knee
replacement
Articial hip
joints
UHMWPE In vitro
Total knee
replacement
UHMWPE In vitro
In vitro
experiments
Review Bearing surface characteristics and surgical
Review Lubrication mechanisms include uid-lm and
Review Fluid-lm lubrication plays a role in reducing
Review Macrophage activity contributes to wear and
Review Alternative bearings (ceramic-on-ceramic,
Review Polyethylene wear remains a key issue in total
Review Material properties and design are crucial for
experiments
In vitro
experiments
experiments
Vitamin E addition improves impact resistance
without increased wear.
Edge loading doesn’t signicantly increase wear
in these pairings.
practices inuence wear in total hip
replacements.
boundary lubrication.
wear in certain conditions.
osteolysis.
metal-on-metal) offer potential wear reduction
but face other challenges.
knee replacements.
wear resistance in articial hip joints.
Contact stress signicantly affects friction and
wear of UHMWPE.
Insert conformity and material affect wear in
total knee replacements.
Cross-shear motion increases wear of
UHMWPE.
A. Kumar et al.
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46, 47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
associated with signicantly higher wear rates. Consequently, variable wear rates
and clinical outcomes have been observed, as such lubrication conditions depend
on implant design, patient factors, and surgical technique. This variability ultimately led to the majority of metal-on-metal implants being withdrawn from clinical use.
Beyond material selection, implant design plays a crucial role in bearing surface
wear. The femoral head radius in hip joints represents a key design parameter. While
larger femoral head radii offer biomechanical advantages, they can also increase
sliding distance. This increase, particularly under boundary lubrication conditions
like those seen in UHMWPE-on-metal pairings, ultimately translates to higher wear
volumes. Conformity between the two articulating surfaces is another vital design
factor. In hip implants, conformity is primarily determined by the radial clearance
between the femoral head and acetabular cup, while in knee implants, it is dened
by the radius of the femoral and tibial bearing surfaces.

1 Introduction toBiotribology: AScience ofSurface Interaction
19
1.7.2 Skin Tribology
Spanning an area of 1.6–2.0m2 and constituting approximately 16% of an adult’s
body weight, the skin stands as the human body’s largest organ. This extensive
mantle envelops the entire body, serving as a vital shield against physical, chemical,
and mechanical insults. Additionally, it provides a formidable barrier against pathogenic microorganisms, acting as the body’s frontline defense against the external
environment.
Throughout daily life, the human skin comes into contact with a diverse array of
materials due to activities like work, exercise, thermoregulation, and personal care.
These interactions inevitably lead to various friction-related challenges, highlighting the intriguing nature of human skin tribology. This eld of research has garnered
increasing attention from scientists in recent years, driven by its potential to illuminate skin health and inform the development of materials that interact with the skin
in a harmonious and benecial manner.
Friction Behavior of Human Skin
Human skin, a multifaceted composite material comprising epidermis, dermis, and
subcutis, exhibits intricate biomechanical properties during interactions with objects
and surfaces [56]. Unlike rigid materials for which Amontons’ laws apply, its highly
non-homogeneous, non-linear, and anisotropic viscoelasticity aligns more closely
with soft elastomers [57, 58]. Consequently, theoretical frameworks for elastomer
friction [59] are employed to decipher its tribological behavior [60].
This framework proposes a two-term, non-interacting friction model encompassing adhesion and deformation components. Under dry conditions, adhesion due to
surface forces, combined with viscoelastic bulk tissue deformation (hysteresis,
plowing), dictates the coefcient of friction (COF) according to Dowson [60].
While adhesion is generally considered the primary contributor, deformation is perceived as less inuential [57, 61].
Researchers have utilized various theoretical models (e.g., Hertz, JohnsonKendall- Roberts, Greenwood-Williamson) to characterize and explain the
mechanical contact behavior and friction mechanisms of skin [57, 60–64]. Interestingly, Derler etal. suggested that skin friction arises as a system property determined by material and surface characteristics of both skin and the contacting
material, along with intermediate layers like trapped substances, cosmetics, sweat,
or sebum [65].
Physical properties of contacting materials, alongside skin’s physiological state
(hydration, sebum level), and mechanical parameters (especially normal load), are
widely acknowledged as key inuences on skin friction [65]. Additional factors
include sliding velocity, age, gender, ethnicity, and anatomical region [66–68].

20
A. Kumar et al.
1.7.3 Oral Tribology
Oral tribology encompasses the study of all tribological phenomena pertinent to the
human oral system. This complex system comprises various structures such as the
palate, chin, teeth, tongue, mucosa, and glands, interconnected by the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Friction and wear within the mouth are unavoidable occurrences associated with essential functions like food processing, oral hygiene, and
even orthodontics [69–73]. Consequently, oral tribology research focuses on understanding the tribological behaviors of teeth, saliva, the TMJ, and the soft tissues
within the oral cavity.
To achieve this multifaceted understanding, researchers employ four primary test
methods:
(a) Clinical investigations invivo: This method directly observes and measures
tribological phenomena within the living human mouth.
(b) In vitro testing: This approach utilizes isolated elements, such as extracted teeth
or articial saliva, in controlled laboratory settings.
(c) In situ testing: This method evaluates tribological parameters while the oral
system is functioning naturally within an individual, often using specialized
probes or sensors.
(d) Finite element analysis: This computational approach simulates and predicts
tribological interactions within the oral system using mathematical models.
By integrating ndings from these diverse investigative avenues, oral tribology
research aims to unravel the intricate interplay of friction, wear, and lubrication
within the oral cavity. Alloy design and fabrication plays an integral role in the performances [74–80]. Laser-assisted fabrication can be a potential method in tuning
the surface and texture [81–93]. This knowledge has the potential to inform the
development of improved dental materials, optimize oral hygiene practices, and
contribute to advancements in orthodontic treatments [84–93].
1.7.4 Effect ofEnvironment andSurface Finish
The environment, including factors like temperature, vacuum conditions, and the
implementation of efcient cooling systems, signicantly inuences tribological
performance. Optimal temperature and vacuum conditions, along with effective
cooling, can minimize friction and wear, improving the longevity and efciency of
mechanical systems [94–97]. Additionally, surface nish, whether achieved through
CNC or traditional machining methods, impacts tribological behavior by affecting
friction, wear, and lubrication effectiveness. Finer surface nishes typically result in
reduced friction and wear, enhancing the overall performance and reliability of
mechanical components [98].

1 Introduction toBiotribology: AScience ofSurface Interaction
21
1.8 Summary
Biotribology, the study of tribological phenomena in biological systems, stands as
one of the most captivating and rapidly expanding areas of current research. Driven
by the pursuit of improved quality of life and inspired by the remarkable efciency
of natural tribological systems, investigations in fundamental theories, biomimetic
design and fabrication, and mitigation of tribology-related damage have ourished.
While signicant progress has been made, numerous challenges remain to be
addressed. Bridging the gap between diverse disciplines is crucial for continued
advancement. We advocate for close collaboration among scientists, engineers, and
clinicians, encompassing expertise in areas ranging from mechanical surfaces and
interfaces to biology, materials science, physics, chemistry, and engineering.
Biotribology research delves into the intricate workings of biological systems,
exploring how diseases develop and how medical treatments and devices can be
optimized from an engineering perspective. Recognizing the unique characteristics
of different biological systems is paramount to achieving a meaningful and tangible
impact on improving quality of life. The eld encompasses a vast spectrum of biological systems, and groundbreaking discoveries in one system often resonate and
translate seamlessly to others. The unique tribological mechanisms identied in
biological systems offer valuable insights for advancing tribology as a whole.
Conversely, advancements in tribological methods and techniques are pivotal for
pushing the boundaries of biotribology research.
The biological aspects of biotribology extend far beyond simply observing
organisms. By understanding the complex interplay between microorganisms, host
metabolism, and tribological phenomena, we unlock exciting possibilities for developing novel strategies to prevent wear, reduce friction, and optimize the performance of implants and medical devices. However, ethical considerations and
potential unintended consequences of targeting these biological aspects necessitate
cautious and responsible research approaches. As we venture deeper into this fascinating realm, remember that unlocking the secrets of biotribology has the potential
to revolutionize healthcare, materials science, and our understanding of life itself.
References
1. D.Dowson, V.Wright, Bio-tribology, in: Proceeding of the Conference on the Rheology of
Lubrication, The Institute of Petroleum, The Institution of Mechanical Engineers, and the
British Society of Rheology, London, 1973, pp.81–88.
2. A.Kumar, S.Keerti, J.Jain, S.Sinha, S.Tekumalla, M.Gupta, Investigations of Wear Response
of Pure Mg and Mg-0.4 Ce-Y2O3/ZnO Nanocomposites Using a Single and Repeated Scratch
Tests, Tribology Transactions, 61, 5, 951–959, 2018, Taylor & Francis.
3. A.Kumar, Advancements in emerging superlubricity: A review of the atomistic models, simulation techniques and their applications to explore the state of ultra-low friction, Materials
Today: Proceedings, 42, 4, 2021.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
