Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5533_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
23 Мб
Скачать
Nanobiotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Diseases

6.4 Other risk factors

Around the world, 10% of gastric cancers are caused by other risk factors. The primary risk factor is highlighted in the following (gure 6.3).
6.4.1 Epstein–Barr virus infection
Approximately 8% of the 5081 gastric cancer patients in a global pooled study of 15 cross-sectional studies harbored Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) in tumor tissue. However, there is currently insufcient epidemiological evidence to conclusively link EBV infections to the development of gastric cancer [25].
6.4.2 Autoimmune disorders
As a result of autoimmune gastritis, which also goes by the names intestinal metaplasia and spasmolytic polypeptide-expression metaplasia, the parietal and principal cells of the gastric mucosa are altered by cells that resemble intestinal cells that secrete mucus [26]. The oxyntic mucosa in the stomach body fully atrophies as a result of these processes, making it more likely that gastric cancer would occur [27].
Figure 6.3. Applications of nanomaterial in cancer diagnosis and therapeutics.
6-6
Nanobiotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Diseases
Intestinal metaplasia patients had a 0.72 per thousand person-years incidence risk of gastric adenocarcinoma, whereas intestinal metaplasia plus low-grade dysplasia patients had a 7.7 per thousand person-years incidence rate. Women are more than twice as likely to have autoimmune gastritis than men [28], and in more than 10% of males it is linked to the condition developing into gastric carcinoid tumors or gastric adenocarcinomas [29].
6.4.3 Ménétriers disease
The oxyntic gland mucosa atrophy, tortuous and cystic gland enlargement, smooth muscle hyperplasia, and foveolar hyperplasia are all signs of Ménétriers disease. There is no information on the prevalence or incidence of this uncommon acquired stomach illness called hypertrophy gastropathy [30]. The cause of childhood Ménétrier disease is unknown, despite a link between the illness and CMV infection being found in a small cohort of patients. In addition, it has been suggested that H. pylori infection may increase the likelihood of developing Ménétrier disease [31].

6.5 Nanotechnology in cancer diagnostic and therapeutics

Different types of nanomaterials use in diagnostic and therapeutics mentioned in gures 6.3. Since numerous types of nanoparticles are being employed for molecular imaging, the use of nanoparticles in cancer diagnosis and monitoring has attracted a lot of attention. Recent advancements in cancer research and diagnostics have made them important due to their benets, including their small size, good biocompatibility, and high atomic number. A few examples of nanoparticles with distinctive structural, optical, or magnetic features that are used in the diagnosis of cancer are iron oxide nanocrystals, semiconductors, and quantum dots [32]. Nanoparticles can be marked or coated with very specific malignancies using a variety of anti-tumor medicines and biomolecules, such as peptides, antibodies, or other compounds. It may be possible to identify cancer in its earliest stages by using nanoparticle imaging of tumor tissue for cancer diagnostics or early cancer cell identication and screening. The development of immunological superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) that can be employed in MRI imaging and target certain cancer cell types has enabled the detection of metastases in lung cancer [33, 34]. Due to their great specicity and lack of known adverse effects, recent investigations have demonstrated that SPIONs are suitable building blocks for aerosols in MRI imaging of lung cancer [35]. Regarding their potential use in cancer treatment, numerous nanotechnology tools, including dendrimers, nanotubes, and liposomes, each with their own distinct properties, have been studied. For instance, nanotubes, which are carbon cylinders formed of benzene rings, can enter the cell through passive diffusion and endocytosis [36]. Additionally, their dynamic chemical characteristics enable the adjustment of their solubility, enabling the drugs held inside the tubes to be released at a predetermined rate. Instead, liposomes, which can form lipid bilayers, are promising delivery methods for combination drugs because they can transport both hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances simultaneously [37].
6-7
Nanobiotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Diseases
The most recent classes of dendrimers have also been developed to carry a therapeutic medication, a diagnostic agent, and an active targeting molecule all in one dendrimer therapy. They are characterized by their inner core and tree-like branches that offer enormous amounts of surface area for drug attachment [37, 38]. In order to achieve targeted drug administration, it is clear that nanotechnology, which involves the generation of numerous nanoparticles with different shapes and behaviors, can open up a vast range of options. Numerous techniques have been used to demonstrate how nanotechnology can be used to cure cancer. They include, but are not limited to: photothermal cancer cell elimination, gene therapy, and intracellular drug delivery for therapeutic purposes [39, 40]. Angiogenesis is used in the delivery of intracellular chemotherapy. Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels used by tumor cells to expand by taking nutrients and oxygen from surrounding cells, is one of the traits of cancer. Angiogenesis blood vessels form unevenly and are more leaky than typical healthy vasculature as a result of their fast, uncontrolled growth [41]. These vessels have pores that are between a few hundred nanometers to several microns in size, as opposed to ordinary vessels, which only have pores that are 2–6 nm in size. Nanoparticlesdiameter, which ranges from 10 to 300 nm, makes them the ideal size for entering tumor cellsblood arteries without signicantly damaging healthy tissues [41]. This Trojan horse approach offers an attractive way to reduce harm to neighboring cells. Another approach is photo­thermal ablation makes use of the difference between the average apoptotic temperature of cancer cells, which occurs at about 42 °C, and normal cells, which occur at about 46 °C. Gold nanoparticles that are made to only excite at particular light frequencies have been used in multiple studies to target and kill specic tumor cells while sparing the surrounding healthy cells [42]. Nanotechnology has the ability to overcome the shortcomings of current methods, such as reducing the health risks associated with treatments depending on viruses. Researchers successfully developed nanoparticles using a synthetic delivery method and small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) to reduce the expression of RRM2, a known anticancer target [43].

6.6 Nanotechnology and gastric cancer diagnostic

In clinical settings, the detection of stomach cancer typically involves the use of conventional imaging techniques such CT, PET, MRI, PET-CT and SPECT. The only imaging modality, poorly targeted biodistribution, fast clearance, and other unfavorable side effects are all drawbacks of contrast agents. It is clear from the various types of nanoparticles that have built-in characteristics or functional modications that new, better imaging techniques are being created for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. They most typically have real-time imaging, specic tumor accumulation and local metastasis, a low tumor-background ratio, high sensitivity, and high resolution [44].
6.6.1 Fluorescence imaging and gastric cancer detection
Fluorescence imaging, a beautiful imaging method, has wonderful benets including real-time mode, quick imaging, adaptable equipment, great safety, and low cost [45].
6-8
Nanobiotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Diseases
The visible spectrum is inferior to the 700–1300 nm near-infrared (NIR) window. Hemoglobin and other endogenous substances greatly absorb and scatter imaging light with wavelengths below 700 nm in human tissues. The lipid and water absorption hinders imaging at wavelengths above 1300 nm [46]. The FDA-approved NIR uorophore indocyanine green (ICG) stands out among the others because of its higher quantum yield and much lower tissue absorption [47]. The use of in vivo imaging in the human body is being adopted for the rst time [48]. Hironori et al investigated the theranostic potential of the ICG-loaded lactosome (ICGm) nano­particle using a murine draining lymph node metastasis model for gastric cancer [49]. The presence of metastatic lymph nodes was found to be reported in the ICGm­treated mice but not in the ICG-treated mice using in vivo imaging. Wang et al developed unique ICG conjugated gold nanoshells that efciently gathered in peritoneal metastasis models as well as subcutaneously transplanted models [50]. For surgical excision and preoperative guiding, near-infrared imaging provided sufficient optical contrast and accurate detection of visible and microtumor lesions (3 mm). The FDA-approved 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and other cyanine-based uorophores have been created for the diagnosis of gastric cancer, however, there are still certain inherent limitations that need to be taken into account. Due to the uorophores’ visible emission prole, imaging light scattering and tissue penetration are still anticipated to be enhanced. In actuality, the NIR window has further divisions called NIR I and NIR II. Because the quantity of scattering is inversely linked to the wavelength of light, NIR II uorophores are of interest to researchers [51, 52]. Additionally, tissue autofluorescence, scattering, and photon attenuation all drasti- cally degrade with increasing imaging wavelengths [53]. Despite the fact that many NIR II nanoparticles have been investigated for tumor imaging, their usage for stomach malignancies is now quite limited [54].
6.6.2 Photoacoustic imaging and gastric cancer detection
One of the promising imaging modalities that can produce incredibly accurate and detailed 2D and 3D images is photoacoustic (PA) imaging. When biological tissue is subjected to non-ionizing pulse lasers directly for PA imaging, exogenous nano­particles or endogenous molecules like hemoglobin absorb the energy. When energy is transformed into heat and causes thermal expansion, which is related to the physiological properties of the tissue, an ultrasound transducer measures the resulting ultrasonic waves. In the end, these outcomes are assessed and recreated as PA photos [55]. Animal models with gastric cancer were subjected to carbon nanotubes coated with RGD-conjugated silica by Wang et al. Results from an optoacoustic imaging system demonstrated that the stomach cancer cells were successfully targeted by the nanotubes in vivo and that the nude model produced powerful PA imaging [56].
Another set of researchers described the use of iron oxide nanoparticles coated with anti-HER2 moieties for PA tumor imaging. The nanoparticles could be used as a PA contrast agent for the imaging of gastric cancer since they specically identied HER2-positive tumors in PA imaging experiments [57]. According to Liang et al
6-9
Nanobiotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Diseases
targeted ligands were CD44v6 monoclonal antibodies coupled to gold nanostar­based PEGylated nanoprobes. PA imaging shown that the nanoprobes could effectively target the vascular system of gastric cancer 4 h following injection [58].
6.6.3 Computed tomography and gastric cancer detection
A common non-radioactive diagnostic for detecting malignancies is CT. Although secure and cutting-edge imaging technologies have been created for clinical usage, the main drawbacks of inadequate targeting and poor sensitivity continue to exist. Nanotechnology is recognized as a magnificent development approach. In a clinical experiment, Zhang et al employed targeted nanoparticle contrast agents and contrast­enhanced CT to nd early-stage stomach cancer [59]. Contrast-enhanced CT with targeted nanoparticles enhances not only CT accuracy but also diagnostic condence in people with suspected stomach cancer as compared to a single CT detection. It was discovered that esophageal carcinoma had similar consequences [60].
6.6.4 Magnetic resonance imaging and gastric cancer detection
The majority of the inorganic nanoparticles used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), another popular method of detection, are superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) [61]. A molecular probe with MRI and optical dual­modality was disclosed by Yan et al [62]. Cyclopeptide GX1 and the near-infrared uorescent dye Cy5.5 were attached to the nano-Fe
that had been altered by
3O4
polyethylene glycol (PEG) to create the nanoprobe. Iron oxide-gold nanoclusters (Fe
@Au@-CD) are coated with -CD to provide a biological nanoprobe with
3O4
great biocompatibility [63].
This nanoprobe displayed red uorescence in the cells and could be selectively picked up by the MGC-803 gastric cancer cells. Although various types of nano­particles have been investigated for MRI, it is important to keep in mind SPIONs drawbacks, such as their genotoxicity [64].
6.6.5 Multimodal imaging and gastric cancer detection
The aforementioned imaging modalities undoubtedly improved the ability to detect gastric cancer, however, each imaging strategy was constrained by its own draw­backs. A single imaging method cannot, however, provide all the information needed. Clinicians can access diverse, complementary, and integrated diagnosis signals by combining several imaging strategies, and they can simultaneously highlight the benets of various tools while also minimizing any potential draw­backs. For example, despite having a low depth of detection, real-time modalities like uorescence imaging and PA imaging can export high contrast pictures for intraoperative use. Nanoparticles are highly suited to act as the carrier in multi­modal imaging because of their capacity to transport a variety of payloads. There have been numerous investigations into nanoparticles with the potential for multi­modal imaging [65, 66]. False signal reduction is possible with SPECT/CT with dual validation as compared to a single imaging equipment. A unique targeted nuclear imaging agent called DTPA/glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78BP) displayed
6-10
Nanobiotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Diseases
greater radioactive signals than non-targeted 111In-labeled micelles [67]. Micelles conjugated with 111In and DTPA/GRP78BP showed a 93% efciency. Additional peruoropentane (PFP)-labeled copper-64 (64Cu) nanodroplets with phospholipid shells were examined for PET/CT and ultrasonic imaging [68].
These nanoparticles help in diagnosis by combining the technology and science with multiple imaging modalities. Additionally, mesoporous silica gap-enhanced Raman tags (Gd-GERTs) loaded with gadolinium are designed specically for preoperative and intra-operative imaging. High MRI T1 relaxivity, multi-mode imaging performance, and remarkable surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) signal with extraordinary dispersity and stability were also displayed [69].

6.7 Nanotechnology and gastric cancer management

6.7.1 Nanomaterial and chemotherapy
Nanomedicines are practical for the delivery of chemotherapeutics due to benets such as reliable biocompatibility and biodegradability. Due to its severe lipophilicity and inability to be supplied via injection, PTX is only used as a second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. The primary compo­nents of abraxane are albumin nanoparticles and PTX with a particle size of about 130 mm. The nanoformulation concurrently reduces toxicity while maintaining the therapeutic benets. Additionally, transendothelial transport via albumin-binding protein causes nanoparticles to accumulate more in tumor tissue in addition to the enhanced permeability and retention effect [70]. Abraxane underwent clinical trials to determine its efcacy and safety in treating gastric cancer, which showed promising action and moderate toxicity. Lung, pancreatic, and metastasized breast cancer are among the tumors for which the FDA has approved the use of Abraxane [71]. Shi et al introduced a brand-new form of PTX nanoparticle with RGD decoration and a disulde connection, giving the polymer-PTX an active target and environment response capability. The nanoparticles effectively suppressed the growth of the tumor by releasing PTX as demonstrated by in vivo studies, and with little adverse effect [72].
Tetrandrine (Tet), an alkaloid of the bisbenzylisoquinoline class, has been shown to increase the anticancer activity of PTX in cases of stomach cancer. By encasing Tet inside self-assembling PTX nanobers, Li et al reported novel PTX and Tet co­loaded nanobers. The self-assembled nanobers showed an improvement in the therapeutic efciency and side effects of PTX in treating gastric cancer, as well as an increase in mitochondrial apoptosis levels and a substantial anti-tumor effect both in vitro and in vivo [73].
One of the rst-line therapies for gastric cancer is 5-uorouracil (5-FU), a uorinated pyrimidine uracil analog. Its cytotoxicity is caused by the binding and inhibition of thymidylate synthase [74]. In the studies by Elisabete et al a mono­clonal antibody against sialyl-Lewis A, a glycan that encourages hematogenous metastasis, was used to functionalize the surface of nanoparticles co-loaded with 5­FU and PTX. As a result, a nano-vehicle that successfully delivered the therapeutic medications 5-FU and PTX to metastatic gastric cancer cells was developed. It is
6-11
Nanobiotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Diseases
hoped that the use of nanoparticles will lead to the development of better therapies for the treatment of gastric associated cancer.
Additionally, doxorubicin (DOX) and irinotecan both have single-agent activity and have been widely used in clinical practice. In slightly acidic conditions, gastric cancer cells demonstrated higher absorption and greater toxicity to nanoparticles than single components of an irinotecan hydrochloride curcumin nano system [75]. For chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy, Zhou and his team encapsulated DOX in a pH-sensitive, long-circulation nanoparticle [76]. Yang and his associates showed how to treat gastric tumors that overexpress Her2 and CD44 using dual­targeting hybrid nanoparticles [77]. Delivering the nanoparticle to stomach cancer cells preferentially is made possible by the anti-Her2 peptide and hyaluronic acid on the surface of NPs that carry the SN38 agent. Treatment for stomach cancer is still hampered by the persistence of chemotherapy resistance, which results in tumor recurrence and chemotherapy failure [78].
Because of their unique physicochemical features resulting from their nanoscale size, nanoparticles have the potential to be used in the battle against drug resistance since they can pass through cell membranes and concentrate more in tumor areas than traditional drugs [79]. TiO
nanoparticles were used by Azimee et al to enhance
2
the therapeutic effects of 5-FU in human AGS gastric cells [80].
TiO
nanoparticles increase the generation of ROS, inhibit autophagy ux, and
2
raise the level of ROS, which induce 5-FU improvement to have cytotoxic and apoptotic effects on AGS cells. Yang et al demonstrated a different strategy to deal with medication resistance by preventing the expression of P-glycoprotein (Pgp). To deliver the anticancer medicine DOX to multidrug resistant gastric cancer cells (SCG 7901/VCR), the SPION functionalized with chemosensitizing chemical XMD8-92 may be employed. Both in vitro and in vivo, the nanoparticles showed greater tumor suppression power than DOX therapy alone. Utilizing nanoparticles could pave the way for a new treatment for chemotherapy resistance in stomach cancer [81].
6.7.2 Nanomedicine and radiotherapy
High-energy radiation therapy that produces ionizing radiation has the potential to kill tumor cells, stop the growth of tiny tumors, and extend local lymph nodes [82].
Nanoparticles contributed signicantly to radiotherapy together with advance­ments in tumor imaging. When used as radiosensitizers, nanoparticles could provide more therapeutic advantages than radiation alone [83].
Using chitosan-modied gold nanoparticles (CS-GNPs), Zhang et al studied how gastric cancer cells respond to x-ray irradiation. The biocompatibility of CS-GNPs was shown by MTT ndings, and survival rates under radiation compared to radiation alone showed an enhancement in cell radiation therapeutic sensitivity, suggesting a possible use in radiation therapy for gastric cancer [84]. Similar techniques were employed by Huang et al to produce biocompatible Ag micro­spheres using BSA (bovine serum albumin). Compared to Ag microspheres, individual nanoscale Ag assemblies showed higher radiation effects on gastric
6-12
Nanobiotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Diseases
cancer cells [85]. Due to their high atomic number and electron density, gold and silver nanoparticles have been used frequently as radiation sensitizers to improve energy deposition into tumor areas and boost the effectiveness of radiotherapy [86].
Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy appeared to be an effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer that possessed the characteristic of a strong propensity for invasion and metastasis. A signicant amount of general toxicity, however, has slowed down the use of traditional chemo-radiotherapy in clinical settings. Because of this, new therapeutic approaches were created in response to the need for treatments with increased efcacy and fewer adverse effects [87].
6.7.3 Phototherapy and gastric cancer detection
The two primary forms of phototherapy, or photo-triggered therapeutic modalities, are photodynamic treatment (PDT) and photothermal therapy (PTT), which have the advantages of being repeatable, non-invasive, and selective. Additionally, in recent years, photoimmunotherapy and photo-induced chemotherapy have garnered a lot of interest [88, 89].
Nanoparticles may be the nest carriers to carry photosensitizers implanted in tumor sites and enhance their biodistribution due to the hydrophobic nature of the majority of photosensitizers, which limits their systemic administration. Additionally, light may be easily adjusted and focused to offer precise treatment while causing the least amount of damage to healthy tissue. A common photo­sensitizer, IR780 produces ROS and heat in response to exposure to light. However, because of its excellent photosensitivity and hydrophobicity, IR780 cannot be dissolved in water and must instead be encapsulated. In order to encapsulate IR780, Deng et al used an amphiphilic macromolecular molecule (sericin-choles­terol) with folic acid as the target ligand. The solubility and photo-stability of IR780 were signicantly improved by using an amphiphilic macromolecule that could self­assemble into stable micelles [90]. After being exposed to an 808 nm laser, these nanoparticles aggregated in tumor tissues and produced ROS, metformin, and IR780. Consequently, complex I in the mitochondrial electron transport chain can be directly inhibited by metformin. Thus, cell respiration prevented tumor hypoxia and improved PDT and PTT for stomach cancer. These studies showed that phototherapy for stomach cancer can be promoted by using nanoparticles to deliver photosensitizers. Other forms of nanomaterials, including CuS, graphene, and gold nanoparticles, were created for photothermal therapy in addition to organic nano­particles [51, 91, 92]. The tumor-targeting nanoparticles developed by Yang et al include 17AAG, iRGD, and carboxyl-functionalized W18O49 nanoparticles. The W18O49 nanoparticles had outstanding PTT and CT imaging contrast, and 17AAGs ability to avoid thermoresistance and block the heat-shock response enhanced the therapeutic effects of PTT and decreased the likelihood of tumor recurrence. W18O49 nanoparticles can greatly increase PTT in vivo and in vitro, target gastric cancer, and offer dual-modality imaging [66].
Gold nanoparticles are particularly efcient in converting optical energy to heat. Mesoporous carbon–gold hybrid nanoprobes for real-time imaging, PTT/PDT, and
6-13
Nanobiotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Diseases
nanozyme oxidative treatment were described by Zhang et al. Due to the wide surface area and multiple –COOH groups of the carbon–gold hybrid nanoparticles, surface chemical modication with different targeting molecules was possible. This resulted in outstanding tumor-targeting efcacy, longer tumor retention, and a helpful therapeutic impact for gastric tumor [93].
6.7.4 Combination therapies and theranostics for gastric cancer detection
Recent years have seen the emergence of novel therapeutics that support anticancer treatments, including targeted, gene and immune-therapy. Although most patients do not benet, the FDA and the European Union have approved ramucirumab and tratuzumab for targeted therapy against advanced gastric cancer [94].
In clinical research, the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy dramatically boosted overall survival, suggesting that combination therapies may be the most effective option for better outcomes. In addition, the use of gene therapy in conjunction with anticancer drugs has enhanced the effectiveness of treatment [95].
A collagen membrane with an aptamer-siRNA chimera/5-FU combination, for instance, may precisely latch on to gastric cancer cells, transport 5-FU to the desired location, and silence a drug-resistant gene [96]. Another fascinating potential therapeutic approach is the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. In clinical gastric cancer, TfR1 binding with H-ferritin nanocarrier may be a novel approach that enhances treatment effectiveness and prognostic prognosis [97]. A PTT/PDT combination with chemotherapy and adjuvant immunotherapy was also created, strengthening the immune responses against cancer [98].
In addition to multimodal imaging and combination therapy, theranostic nano­particles, which combine co-delivery of an imaging unit and a therapeutic unit, are being used in an increasing number of nano-based designs. Prior to the development of theranostic nanoparticles, doctors could only detect tumors either before or after therapeutic interventions. Additionally, a number of nanoparticle frameworks with integrated imaging capabilities, such as SPIONs for MRI and gold nanoparticles for CT, make excellent candidates for the development of theranostic systems. And most photosensitizers, notably IR780 and chlorin E6, exhibited both tumor toxicity and imaging capabilities. This is due to the fact that photosensitizers can act as a vector to produce heat and/or ROS in addition to excitation of uorescence and absorption of NIR. The other kind of theranostic nanoparticles combine the payloads for diagnosis and treatment into a single nanoparticle. However, more intricate quality control comes at a higher price. Theranostic systems based on nanotechnology have been created and have shown promise in the treatment of gastric cancer [99].

6.8 Challenges and prospectives

There are only a few FDA-approved nanomedicines for treating gastric cancer out of the more than 50 that have been approved [100]. The complexity of patients aberrant molecular traits in gastric cancer patients continues to be a major barrier. The gastric cancers papillary, tubular, mucinous, and poorly cohesive carcinomas
6-14
Nanobiotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Diseases
were classied by the World Health Organization. But there is currently no dened system for classifying biologics, and the clinical applicability is quite modest [101]. Additionally, it is still unknown how gastric cancer develops on a molecular level. Theranostic performance is believed to be aided by knowledge of molecular pathways and the discovery of potent biomarkers for gastric cancer. The limitations of the accessible nanoparticles are mentioned, along with the aforementioned uses. NIR dyes were not as effective because of insufcient tissue penetration. Quantum dots can detect a signal at a deeper level, however, safety and biocompatibility are concerns. To clear the way for improved performance, some strategies have been put out. Donor–acceptor–donor (DAD) dyes and NIR-II imaging probes are combined to form multiplexed NIR-II probes, which have been described by Rui et al as an excellent imaging approach for directing sentinel lymph node excision in a variety of cancer models [102]. On the one hand, tissue autouorescence and scattering are diminished by longer wavelength NIR-II uorescence imaging. Bright-light dual­NIR II imaging-guided surgery has greater clinical potential and is more practical. Another uorescence dual-mode imaging agent has been developed to diagnose lymph node tumor metastasis without the use of a microscope. However, there are not many pertinent studies focused on gastric cancer [103].
Although there are numerous studies in this area, the majority of them involve in vivo research. The biodistribution and targeting capabilities of nanoparticles may differ between preclinical investigations and clinical practice due to changes in the bodys metabolisms, the characteristics of the nanoparticles, and the signicant degree of tumor heterogeneity. For instance, proteins, such as antibodies, may be taken up by nanoparticle surfaces and form the protein corona [104]. The targeting and anticancer actions in vivo are impacted by denatured proteins in the corona of nanoparticles. These problems are supposed to be addressed by biomimetic nano­particles [105]. Natural nanoscale membrane vesicles are found outside of cells. Tumor image monitoring and therapy are made possible by extracellular vesicles with special physiological and biochemical characteristics, such as prolonged retention circulation duration, higher tissue and organ targeting specicity, and improved cytoplasmic delivery effectiveness [106]. Nanoparticles with membrane coatings have also shown to be efcient nanocarriers. For minimizing the off-target effect and extending in vivo circulation, the gold standard is to combine biomimetic nanoplatforms with RGD peptide or HER-2 antibodies [107]. Multifunctional nanoparticles now have the ability to target and improve image contrast. But more functionality necessitates more expensive and time-consuming synthetic processes. Additionally, there are more complicated in vivo behavior and impacts, as well as greater regulatory obstacles [108].
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, and nanotechnology offers a practical option for early detection and therapy that is guided by imaging. Nanoparticle design and synthesis involved a number of materials with various imaging and therapeutic properties, and the results were encouraging. A thorough knowledge and rigorous approach may stimulate rational planning and translational medical research, even though there are still some obstacles to be addressed and a long way to go before preclinical investigations
6-15