Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5784_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
40 Мб
Скачать
252
Fig. 15.6 Clean probe storage
J.T. Nomura and A.D. Nagdev
Fig. 15.7 Wiping gel off probe
Initial Steps ofDisinfection ofAll Probes
1. Remove barrier (if used) and dispose.
2. Wipe gel and debris off probe with towel (Fig.15.7).
3. Wipe dry probe with germicidal wipes (Fig.15.8) or spray with disinfection
spray (Fig.15.9) (or washing with soap and water prior to HLD).
4. Follow disinfection protocols based on infection control categorization below.
15 Ultrasound Safety andInfection Control
Fig. 15.8 Disinfecting dry external probe with germicidal wipe
Fig. 15.9 Disinfecting dry external probe with germicidal spray
253
US Probe Infection Control Classication
Medical devices are classied into one of three categories: non-critical, semi-critical, and critical. This categorization informs the clinician of the type of disinfection or sterilization that must be performed to keep the device pathogen free.

Noncritical Devices (Noninvasive Probes)

Noncritical devices are those that come in contact with intact skin, which is thought to act as a barrier to most microorganisms. Ultrasound transcutaneous transducers (linear, phased array, curvilinear, etc.) are considered noncritical medical devices. Low-level disinfection (LLD) is thought to be adequate when cleaning noncritical medical devices, and should be performed between each use in a similar manner. LLD cleaning products include isopropyl alcohol (Fig. 15.10), bleach wipes
254
Do not use alcohol in this area
J.T. Nomura and A.D. Nagdev
Cleaning the Distal Tip of the Transducer with Isopropyl Alcohol
A
Fig. 15.10 LLD—isopropyl alcohol
B
C
1 inch
(2.5cm)
E
D
F
A - Cable
B - Strain Relief
C - Strain relief/housing joint
D - Housing
E -
F - You may use alcohol in this area
(Fig.15.11), quaternary sprays (Fig.15.12), ammonium chloride sprays (Fig.15.13), and any other approved LLD cleaning solution (Table15.2) in a standard cleaning format between transducer uses had been shown to be efcacious in removing most pathogens (bacteria, virus and fungus) [34]. Betadine is not recommended due to staining of the plastic or rubber on the probe (Fig.15.14). Methicillin resistant Staph Aureus (MRSA) has been shown to be present on uncovered transducers, but can be easily removed with germicidal wipes cleaning (LLD) [34]. When performing ultra­sound examinations on non-intact skin (cellulitis, abscess, etc.), we recommend placing a transparent dressing securely on the transducer before beginning the examination.
15 Ultrasound Safety andInfection Control
Fig. 15.11 LLD—bleach wipe
255
Fig. 15.12 LLD— quaternary spray
256
J.T. Nomura and A.D. Nagdev
Fig. 15.13 LLD—ammonium chloride reagent
Table 15.2 Cleaning solutions for surface or noncritical devices
Ethyl or isopropyl alcohol (70–90%) Sodium hypochlorite (5.25–6.15% household bleach diluted 1:500 provides >100ppm available
chlorine) Phenolic germicidal detergent solution (follow product label for use-dilution) Iodophor germicidal detergent solution (follow product label for use-dilution) Quaternary ammonium germicidal detergent solution (follow product label for use-dilution)
15 Ultrasound Safety andInfection Control
Fig. 15.14 Betadine staining of probe

Semi-Critical Devices

257
Semi-critical devices are those that come into contact with non-intact skin or mucosa. These devices include transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) transduc­ers and endocavitary ultrasound transducers (Fig.15.15). Even though probe covers are always used with endocavitary transducers, preventing direct contact of the probe surface and mucosal membranes, most governing bodies (CDC, AIUM and ACOG, ACEP*) classify these probes as semi-critical devices [23, 2527].
Semi-critical medical devices require high-level disinfection (HLD) in order to eliminate all bacterial microorganisms except for a small number of bacterial spores. Chemical disinfectants considered acceptable semi-critical medical devices are listed (Table15.3) and/or can be obtained from the ultrasound transducer man­ufacturer. Medical centers using either endocavitary or TEE transducers should have a well-dened method for high-level disinfection or enlist the aid of hospital
258
Fig. 15.15 Examples of semi-critical devices—Endocavitary and TEE probes
Table 15.3 Sterilants and high-level disinfectants listed by the FDA
Name Composition/Action
Glutaraldehyde Organic compound (CH
Induces cell death by cross-linking cellular proteins; usually used alone or mixed with formaldehyde
Hydrogen peroxide Inorganic compound (H
Antiseptic and antibacterial; a very strong oxidizer with oxidation potential of 1.8V
Peracetic acid Organic compound (CH
Antimicrobial agent (high oxidization potential)
Οrtho-Phthalaldehyde Organic compound (C
Strong binding to outer cell wall of contaminant organisms
Hypochlorite/ hypochlorous acid
Phenol/phenolate Organic compound (C
Hibidil Chlorhexidine gluconate (C
Inorganic compound (HClO) Myeloperoxidase-mediated peroxidation of chloride ions
Antiseptic
Chemical antiseptic
(CH2CHO)2)
2
)
2O2
H)
3CO3
(CHO)2)
6H4
OH)
5H5
22H30Cl2N10
J.T. Nomura and A.D. Nagdev
)
based sterile processing to ensure compliance. Obstetrics, cardiology and other services will be complying with HLD standards for their ultrasound transducers, and learning your hospital’s current method for disinfection is often the rst step in building a high-level disinfection method that is compliant with current recommendations.
The process of HLD involves multiple steps accomplished in either the clinical department or by hospital based sterile processing. Examples of ED department disinfection devices include glutaraldehyde-related solution hood and soaking sta­tions (Fig.15.16 and Fig.15.17) and portable or mounted heated hydrogen peroxide stations (Figs.15.18 and 15.19). There is no standard format for HLD of endocavi­tary probes. Rather, recommendations from transducer manufacturers in conjunc­tion with CDC guidelines should guide the process. Documentation of a procedural log (Fig.15.20) and replacement of disinfection solution should be standardized and in accordance with hospital and regulatory practices.
15 Ultrasound Safety andInfection Control
Fig. 15.16 HLD— glutaraldehyde
Fig. 15.17 Mounted portable HLD soak station
259
Even though probe covers or condoms are always used with endocavitary probes (Fig.15.21), low-level disinfection with germicidal wipes have been shown to not remove all bacteria and viruses [31, 32]. Probe cover perforation (Fig.15.22) after routine endocavitary probe use is reported to range from 1 to 9% [28]. Higher per­foration rates are reported to occur with commercial probe covers as compared to condoms, 8.3 vs. 1.7% [28]. Higher rates of condom perforation (25–815) are seen with ultrasound- guided procedural interventions (oocyte retrieval for IVF) [29]. In a series of 168 patients who had a TEE procedure performed, the latex condom perforation rate post procedure was reported to be 4.4% [30]. Because of the risk of pathogen transmission, current CDC standards mandate HDL in between patient usage when using covered endocavitary transducers.
260
Fig. 15.18 Trophon mounted
J.T. Nomura and A.D. Nagdev
Fig. 15.19 Open Trophon
15 Ultrasound Safety andInfection Control
Fig. 15.20 HLD disinfection log
Fig. 15.21 Probe barriers
261
Fig. 15.22 Leakage from endocavitary barrier