Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5784_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
40 Мб
Скачать
12 Ultrasound Equipment andPurchase
Fig. 12.9 Probe ports
Fig. 12.10 Wireless
connectivity, external wireless dongle
151
Fig. 12.11 Video input and output digital connections
152
Fig. 12.12 Built-in keyboard
R. Liu et al.
height adjustable with an articulating monitor (Fig. 12.13), allowing viewing from multiple angles. Some machines have separate touchscreens (Fig.12.14), sealed control panels (Fig.12.15), or retractable keyboards (Fig.12.16) that offer more versatility in machine interactions than smaller form factors. The comput­ers are robust enough to offer software packages that allow the most advanced functions (e.g. advanced cardiac imaging, transesophageal echocardiography, 3-D ultrasound). In general, their hardware performs at the highest levels and their processors are capable of producing the best image quality. They are wheeled from room to room, with modern designs structured to t next to the patient’s stretcher. They require adequate space surrounding the patient as well as dedicated storage space for the machine when not in use. Most modern com­pact cart-based machines have battery packs (Fig.12.17) that allow use in the patient room without being plugged in, though they will need to be charged between use. Battery life typically lasts 1–2h before requiring recharge. These machines will have onboard storage of digital clips, with Ethernet or wireless transfer to PACS and middleware programs available. Other options such as ther­mal printing, VHS, DVD, and USB image transfer are also available. Warranties for these machines are typically 3–5years.
12 Ultrasound Equipment andPurchase
Fig. 12.13 Angled monitor arm
153
Fig. 12.14 Touchscreen and hard controls
154
Fig. 12.15 Glass panel
Fig. 12.16 Keyboard
R. Liu et al.
Fig. 12.17 Compact battery
12 Ultrasound Equipment andPurchase
155

Hand-Carried Ultrasound Machines

These machines use a clamshell laptop or small television design (Fig.12.3), and newer machines have touchscreen monitors contained in durable plastic housing. They usually have handles that allow the machine to be carried like a briefcase, and some can t into a backpack. These systems may also be mounted on wheeled carts with cups to hold transducers and gel. They have the advantage of being detachable from the cart and carried if eld portability is needed. They usually have one connection port for one transducer to be attached, and do not have the ability to add multiple probes simultaneously unless connected to a multiport adapter. Some companies are exploring Bluetooth cable-free transducers for this level of machine to free users from cable entanglement while changing probes. Hand-carried machines require less storage space than larger cart-based systems, but still require designated housing areas. Many of them can handle advanced applications, but software packages and certain capabilities may not be offered for all machines. They may provide less video output options, and may not pos­sess inbuilt internet solutions like a wi- card, thus requiring external Ethernet adaptors or USB/SD card storage and retrieval. In 2017, these machines typically cost between $20,000 and $50,000 USD depending on the probes, cart, and soft­ware packages purchased with it. They also carry warranties lasting about a 3–5year span.

Pocket-Carried Ultrasound Machines

With advancements in technology, the size of machines has become much smaller—small enough to t inside a white coat pocket (Fig.12.4). Some com­panies have created their own proprietary tablet-like devices, and may incorpo­rate secured transducers that are not interchangeable. Others have placed hardware into their probes that connect with existing market tablets or smart­phones with control of features through a downloadable app. The rst of these pocket-carried ultrasounds were the GE Vscan and the Siemens Acuson P10. In 2015, tablet and smartphone android-based ultrasounds like the Philips Lumify and Sonosite iViz were introduced, with a transducer drawing power through the tablet micro-USB port. Now, other companies like Clarius and Healcerion are offering similar tablet-based machines that are compatible with both iOS and android, as well as wireless or Bluetooth transmission capabilities. This market is still relatively new and expanding quickly; newer models may not be ready for prime time marketing, but highlight promising features of future designs. They
156
R. Liu et al.
are much better for eld use, but there may be issues with connectivity. They use various techniques to create sound waves, depending on the design of their device. Upfront costs are less than cart-based or hand-carried machines but war­ranties may be shorter and features are not robust. Some companies propose monthly or annual subscription models that may cumulatively equal the cost of larger machines.
The newest models employ touchscreens, with other models using Blackberry­like qwerty buttons or dials. “Older” generation machines available in the early 2000s do not have wireless connectivity options and require docking to a computer to transfer images. The latest devices support USB or micro-SD card image stor­age and transfer of images via wireless internet (cloud or email). Some of these machines may not offer video output connection, and, in general, are not designed for intermediate- advanced features. Image quality is not as good as cart-based or hand- carried machines, but as technology advances, this is improving. They are easily storable, but theft may be a problem. They are also prone to issues that affect current tablets: screen glare, difculty obtaining optimum viewing angle, nger­print smudges, freezes or forced reboots, and “buggy” image export. However, interest is increasing as their accessibility, relative low cost, easy storage, and decent image quality caters to populations (primary care, international work, EMS eld use, education, etc.) that have been hindered in the past. As of 2015, these machines typically cost $7500–$15,000 USD. Their warranties last 1–5 years, though shorter warranties are more typical with this type of equipment. As of late 2017, new pocket-size machines based on non-piezoelectric technology called CMUT (capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer) were announced for shipping in 2018. These machines use silicon chips to create voltage sent across a membrane to generate a sound wave. They have the ability to create a wide beam­width and enable one transducer to perform across a variety of US probe formats, from linear to curved to phased array, which then can be utilized for multiple appli­cations. They use algorithms and signal processing to create optimal images. With the ability to plug into a smartphone, and the advertised price of near $2000, the new CMUT technology may have a large effect on portable US use with POC US, remote, prehospital, and even home use.

Pole or Arm Mounted US Machines

These machines are mobile, either by mounting on a rolling pole or a monitor arm, with the monitor containing touch controls (Fig.12.6). Many pocket-sized US machines can be made “less pocket” and more mounted, rendering them multifunctional as a cross between a hand-carried machine on a cart and a true pocket, machine. In the past, most of these machines had small monitors and raised knobs or buttons, but most recently the trend has been to use touchscreen
12 Ultrasound Equipment andPurchase
157
and controls similar to mobile phones to facilitate ease of use. While most have some advanced features, these machines are meant for particular purposes like intravenous line placement guidance, trauma assessment or resuscitation US in the resuscitation rooms, nerve blocks in the preoperative area, vascular guidance in the angiography suites, or other uses. Most can hold one to three transducers, similar to other transducers from the same vendor. All have battery capacity, and moderate screen size. While functionality is similar to hand-carried machines, touchscreens, footprint and visual access is often felt to superior. Disadvantages may include lack of keyboards, easy access to secondary controls, and buried advanced features.
Table 12.1 provides a comparison of the types of POC US machine types.
Table 12.1 Summary of advantages and disadvantages regarding machine types
Cart-based machines
Pros • Most advanced
features
• Robust processors • Can be
• Largest hard drive/ memory
• Large screen size • Wheeled cart
• Multidirectional mobile screen
• Typically has best image quality
• Holds 3 or more probes
• Storage for accessories
• Wheeled • Some
• Integrates best with electronic workow solutions/processes
Hand-carried machines
• Fits into a briefcase
carried
• Relatively lightweight
option
• Less holding space needed
• Can be wall mounted
• Good image quality
• Rugged and durable
designed for eld use
• Longer battery life (about 2h)
Pocket-sized machines
• Most portable • Portable on
• Lightest weight • Monitor and
• Needs least holding space
• Some offer both wi and 3g/4g connectivity
• Longer battery life (2–9h depending on use)
• Least expensive, although expensive for size
Pole/arm mounted machines
moveable pole or arm
controls usually n one screen or face
• Can adapt pocket size onto moveable pole or arm
• Not carried
• Wi connectivity
• Battery life similar to hand carried (2h)
• Often dedicated to particular clinical purpose (procedural guidance, resuscitation)
(continued)
158
Table 12.1 (continued)
Cart-based machines
Cons • Larger size • May not
• Requires dedicated holding space for storage and charging
• Less maneuverable • May not
• Heavier • Screens not
• For indoor use only • Some offer
• Too big to mount to a wall
• Short battery life (1h) before requiring wall charge
• Highest cost
Hand-carried machines
offer advanced features
• Not as much storage space
accommodate multiple probe attachment
as adjustable
only external wi adapters
R. Liu et al.
Pocket-sized machines
• Typically not good image quality (although newest models are impressive)
• Older models with cumbersome connectivity
• Screen glare • Keyboard on
• May not simultaneously charge and be useable
• Less video output options
• May not interface with workow processes
• Security issues with wireless image handling
Pole/arm mounted machines
• Limited features
• Limited storage space
monitor or mobile
• External wi adapters
• Workow solutions may be limited in function
• Screen unidirectional
• Controls are menu-designed

Probe Selection

Choosing which probe(s) to purchase depends on cost, ultrasound applications desired, probe frequency ranges, and patient population. A probe (also called a “transducer”) is dened by the size and shape of its “footprint,” which is the face of the probe (Fig.12.18) that contacts the patient and encases the crystals that transmit and receive sound waves. Probe footprint will determine where a probe can best be used: wide footprint probes (Fig.12.19) are best for the abdomen, where ribs do not obscure the view. Small footprint probes (microconvex or phased array) (Fig.12.20) will be best for evaluations of the chest, as they can image between the ribs without interference.
12 Ultrasound Equipment andPurchase
Fig. 12.18 Footprint enhanced phased array face
Fig. 12.19 Wide footprint curvilinear face
159
Fig. 12.20 Small curvilinear face
160
R. Liu et al.
Probe footprint is often associated with probe frequency. Probes transmitting lower frequency waves are able to penetrate deeper into body cavities while higher frequency probes produce greater image resolution of supercial structures. Linear and endocavitary probes tend to be higher frequency, while abdominal and cardiac probes (curvilinear and phased array) are lower frequency. However, there may be frequency range options available for these standard probes. For example, practitioners imaging pediatric patients may want to look at higher frequency abdominal probes. Of note, most probes today are “broadband,” utilizing multiple frequencies within a certain range to optimize the image based on depth.
There are four main types of probes that are used in clinician-performed ultra­sound: curvilinear (Fig.12.21), linear (Fig.12.22), phased array (Fig.12.23), and endocavitary (Fig.12.24) (Table12.2) [4]. These will allow performance of nearly every application for point-of-care ultrasound. Recently, there have been some pub­lications about performing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the point- of­care setting. This would require a separate special probe (Fig.12.25), but this practice
Fig. 12.21 Curvilinear transducer
Fig. 12.22 Linear transducer