Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5783_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.2 How Is Critical Care Humanized?
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •1.2.2 Communication
- •1.2.5 Post-ICU Syndrome
- •1.2.6 Humanized Infrastructure
- •1.2.7 End-of-Life Care
- •2.2 Which Patients Should Undergo ICP Monitoring?
- •2.5.2.3 CSF Drainage
- •2.5.2.4 Osmotherapy
- •2.5.2.5 Ventilation
- •2.5.2.6 CPP Augmentation
- •2.5.2.7 Metabolic Suppression
- •2.5.2.8 Pharmacologic Suppression
- •2.5.2.9 Temperature Modulation
- •2.5.2.10 Decompressive Craniectomy
- •2.7.1.1 Pressure Reactivity Index (PRx)
- •2.7.1.2 Multimodality Monitoring
- •2.8 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)
- •3.3 ICH: Presenting Symptoms
- •3.5.1 Blood Hypertension
- •3.5.2 Other Risk Factors
- •3.6 ICH: Pathophysiology
- •3.7 ICH: Initial Management
- •3.7.1 Airway: Intubation
- •3.7.3 ICH: Imaging
- •3.7.4 ICH: Grading Scales
- •3.7.5 Fluid Management
- •3.7.6 Follow-Up Imaging
- •3.7.7 Blood Pressure Management
- •3.7.9 ICP Monitoring
- •3.7.10 Surgical Considerations
- •3.7.13 ICH: Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
- •3.7.14 ICH: Seizure Management
- •3.8 ICH: Medical Complications
- •3.8.1 Glycemic Management
- •3.8.3 Disposition
- •3.9 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •Appendix: Direct Oral Anticoagulant Reversal
- •Reversal Strategies
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2.1 Hemodynamic Management
- •4.2.2 Hormonal Replacement Therapy
- •4.2.3 Respiratory Management
- •4.3 Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)
- •4.4 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2.1 Vasoactive Agents
- •5.2.1.1 Vasodilators (Table 5.1)
- •Calcium Channel Blockers
- •Nimodipine
- •Nicardipine
- •Other Vasodilators
- •Magnesium
- •3-Hydroxy-3-Methyl-Glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) Reductase Inhibitors (Statins)
- •Nitroprusside
- •Endothelin-1 Antagonists
- •Hydralazine
- •Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
- •Papaverine
- •Norepinephrine
- •Epinephrine
- •Dopamine (DA)
- •Phenylephrine
- •Vasopressin
- •Neuromonitoring
- •5.2.2.1 Benzodiazepines
- •5.2.2.2 Barbiturates
- •5.2.2.3 Opioids
- •5.2.2.4 Anticonvulsant Medications
- •5.2.2.5 Other Sedatives/Anesthetics
- •5.2.3 Hemodynamic Agents
- •5.4 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2.3 Ultrasound Behaviour at Acoustic Boundaries
- •6.3 Pulse-Echo Principles (B-Mode Techniques)
- •6.4 Transducers
- •6.5 Artefacts
- •6.6 Doppler Principles
- •6.6.1 Pulsed Wave Doppler
- •6.6.2 Duplex Scanning
- •6.6.3 Colour Flow Imaging (CFI)
- •6.7.2 Flow Changes
- •6.7.3 Cerebrovascular Resistance
- •6.8 Transcranial Colour-Coded Duplex Sonography (TCCS)
- •6.9 Ultrasound Safety
- •6.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •Mesencephalic Plane
- •7.2.1.2 Diencephalic Plane (Thalamic Plane)
- •6.6.4 Power Doppler Imaging (PDI)
- •6.7 Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound (TCD)
- •6.7.1 Velocity Measurement
- •7.2.1.3 Ventricular Plane (Cella Media)
- •7.2.1.4 Upper Pons Plane
- •7.2.1.5 Lower Pons Plane
- •7.2.2 Transforaminal Window
- •7.3.1.2 Anterior Circulation
- •Carotid System
- •Anterior Cerebral Artery
- •Anterior Communicating Antery
- •7.3.1.3 Posterior Circulation
- •Vertebrobasilar System
- •Posterior Communicating Artery
- •Posterior Cerebral Arteries
- •7.5 Cerebral Circulation: Anatomical Variations
- •7.5.1.1 Anterior Circulation
- •Most Common Variations [28]
- •7.5.1.2 Posterior Circulation
- •Most Common Variants [28]
- •7.6.1.1 Deep Middle Cerebral Vein (DMCV)
- •7.6.1.2 Basal Vein (of Rosenthal)
- •7.6.1.3 Great Cerebral Vein (of Galen)
- •7.6.2.1 Sphenoparietal Sinus
- •7.6.2.2 Superior Petrosal Sinus
- •7.6.2.3 Inferior Petrosal Sinus
- •7.6.2.4 Cavernous Sinus
- •7.6.2.5 Transverse Sinus
- •7.6.2.6 Straight Sinus
- •7.7 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Cerebral Blood Flow Measures
- •8.3 Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS)
- •8.4.1 Cerebral Autoregulation (CA)
- •8.4.2 CO2 Vasoreactivity
- •8.6.2 TCD/TCCS: Use After Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
- •8.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.3 TCD Hemodynamic Parameters: Variations by Sex
- •9.4 TCD Hemodynamic Parameters: Variations by Age
- •9.5 TCD Hemodynamic Parameters: Variations by Laterally
- •9.7 TCD Normal Values: Latin American Population Sample
- •9.8 TCD Hemodynamic Parameters: Altitude
- •9.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 TCD/TCCS: Acoustic Windows
- •10.2.1.1 Technique
- •10.2.2.1 Technique
- •10.2.3.1 Technique
- •10.2.4.1 Technique
- •10.2.5.1 Technique
- •10.4.1 Decompressive Craniectomy
- •10.4.2 Patient’s Position
- •10.5 TCD/TCCS: Contrast-Enhanced
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Basic Methods
- •11.2.1 Flow Velocities
- •11.2.2 Pulsatility Index (PI)
- •11.3 Advanced Methods
- •11.3.2 TAU (Cerebrovascular Time Constant)
- •11.3.4 Autoregulation
- •11.4.1 Traumatic Brain Injury
- •11.4.2 Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- •11.4.3 Stroke
- •11.4.4 Other Clinical Scenarios
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 TCD: Spectral Wave
- •12.4 TCD: Clinical Utility
- •12.6 TCD: Technique
- •12.6.2 Transtemporal Acoustic Window
- •12.6.2.1 Anterior Circulation
- •Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA)
- •12.6.2.2 Posterior Circulation
- •Posterior Cerebral Artery (PCA)
- •12.6.3 Submandibular Acoustic Window
- •12.6.3.1 Internal Carotid Artery (ICA—Extracranial Portion)
- •12.6.4 Transoccipital Acoustic Window
- •12.6.4.1 Posterior Circulation
- •12.6.5 Transorbital Acoustic Window
- •12.6.6.2 Pulsatility Index
- •12.7.1 High-Velocity Pattern
- •12.7.2 Low-Velocity Pattern
- •12.7.3 High Resistance Pattern
- •12.7.4 Cerebral Circulatory Arrest Pattern
- •12.8 TCD: Other Clinical Uses
- •12.8.1.1 Cerebral Vascular Reactivity
- •12.9 TCD: Limitations
- •12.10 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Acoustic Windows
- •13.3 2D-Guided TCD Monitoring
- •13.6 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 TCCS: Anatomical Aspects
- •14.3.1 Anterior Circulation
- •14.3.1.1 Carotid System
- •14.3.2 Posterior Circulation
- •14.3.2.1 Vertebro-Basilar System
- •14.5 TCCS: Examiner Considerations
- •14.6 TCCS: Acoustic Windows
- •14.7 TCCS: Examination Protocol
- •14.7.1.1 Considerations
- •Doppler: (Convention)
- •14.7.2 Transtemporal Acoustic Window Examination (Coronal Planes)
- •14.7.3 Transoccipital (Transnuchal/Transforaminal) Acoustic Window Examination
- •14.7.4 Submandibular Acoustic Window Examination
- •14.7.5 Transorbital Acoustic Window Examination
- •14.7.6 Frontal Bone Window Examination
- •14.8 TCCS Protocol: Clinical Applications
- •14.9 TCCS Protocol: Hemodynamic Parameters
- •14.10 TCCS Protocol: Limitations
- •14.10.1 Limitations
- •14.10.1.1 Acoustic Windows
- •Transtemporal Acoustic Window
- •Suboccipital Acoustic Window
- •14.10.1.2 Middle-Line Shift Measurement
- •14.11 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Clinical Applications
- •15.2.1 Intracranial Stenosis
- •15.2.2 Cerebral Vasospasm
- •15.2.3 Cerebral Veins
- •15.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3.1 Autoregulation Index (ARI)
- •16.3.2 Mean Flow Velocity Index (Mx)
- •16.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2.1 Cerebrovascular Resistance (CVR)
- •17.2.2 Cerebral Autoregulation
- •17.2.4 Carbon Dioxide Reactivity
- •17.3.2 Collateral Flow
- •17.3.3 Elastic Reservoir (“Windkessel Effect”)
- •17.4 TCD: Waveform Interpretation
- •17.4.1 TCD Waveforms
- •17.5.1 Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- •17.5.2 Increased ICP
- •17.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.3.1 Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH)
- •18.3.1.1 Cerebral Autoregulation (CA)
- •18.3.1.2 Intraparenchymal Cerebral Oxygen Monitoring
- •18.3.1.3 Cerebral Blood Flow
- •18.3.1.4 Electrophysiology
- •Seizure Detection
- •18.3.1.5 Cerebral Metabolism
- •18.3.2 Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)
- •18.3.2.1 Intraparenchymal Cerebral Oxygen Monitoring
- •18.3.2.3 Electrophysiology
- •18.3.3 Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
- •18.3.3.2 Cerebral Autoregulation
- •18.3.3.3 Intraparenchymal Cerebral Oxygen Monitoring
- •18.3.3.4 Cerebral Blood Flow
- •18.3.3.5 Electrophysiology
- •18.3.3.6 Cerebral Metabolism
- •18.3.4 Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS)
- •18.3.4.1 Cerebral Blood Flow
- •18.3.4.2 Electrophysiology
- •18.3.5.1 Cerebral Blood Flow
- •18.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Cerebral Blood Haemodynamic Measurements
- •19.3 Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF): Physiology Principles
- •19.4 Vasoreactivity Determining: Methods
- •19.6 Technical Tips
- •19.7 Vasoreactivity: Clinical Importance
- •19.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •20.1 Introduction
- •20.5.4.1 Experimental Endotoxemia
- •20.6 Conclusion
- •Appendix
- •Methods
- •Group 1: Graphic Methods
- •“Beat-by-Beat Method”
- •Method Described by Aaslid
- •Group 2: Multiparameter or Impedance Methods [14]
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2.1 Brain Compliance
- •21.2.2 TCD/TCCS: Cerebral Hemodynamics
- •21.4 Pulsatility Index (PI): Intracranial Pressure (ICP)
- •21.5.1 Cardiovascular Factors
- •21.5.2 Cerebrovascular Factors
- •21.5.3 Cardiopulmonary Factors
- •21.5.4 Metabolism Factors
- •21.5.5 Vascular Factors
- •21.5.6 Other Factors
- •21.6 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •22.1 Introduction
- •22.2 Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH)
- •22.3 Cerebral Vasospasm After aSAH
- •22.5.1 TCD/TCCS: Examination Protocol
- •22.5.1.1 Transtemporal Window
- •22.5.1.2 Orbital Window
- •22.5.1.3 Suboccipital/Transforaminal Window
- •22.5.1.4 Submandibular Window
- •22.7 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •23.1 Introduction
- •23.3.1 Premise
- •23.3.3 Limitations
- •23.4.1 Technical Requirements
- •23.4.3 Limitations
- •23.6 Future Directions
- •23.7 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •24.1 Introduction
- •24.2.1 Vasospasm
- •24.2.2 Vasospasm Diagnostic Criteria
- •24.3 TCD/TCCS: Cerebral Vasoreactivity
- •24.4 TCD/TCCS: Intraoperative Monitoring
- •24.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •25.1 Introduction
- •25.4 CAD: Diagnosis
- •25.6 Pupil: Ultrasound Examination
- •25.11 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •26.1 Introduction
- •26.2 Optimal Settings
- •26.2.1 Probe Types
- •26.2.2 Frequencies
- •26.2.3 Focus
- •26.2.4 Depth
- •26.2.5 Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF)
- •26.2.6 Frame Rate
- •26.2.8 Freeze
- •26.2.9 Cine Loop
- •26.2.10 Smoothing (Interpolation), Interlacing, Correlation
- •26.2.11 Postprocessing
- •26.2.12 Resolution
- •26.2.13 Doppler-Technique
- •26.2.14 PW-Doppler (Pulsed-Wave Doppler)
- •26.2.15 Color Duplex
- •26.3 Indications
- •26.4.1.2 Morphological Differences
- •26.4.1.3 Flow Differences
- •26.4.1.4 Compression
- •26.5 B-Mode Examination
- •26.5.1 Dilation
- •26.5.2 Intima-Media Thickness (IMT)
- •26.5.3 Plaque Analysis
- •26.5.3.1 Location
- •26.5.3.3 Maximal Thickness
- •26.5.3.4 Surface
- •26.5.3.5 Echogenicity
- •26.5.4 B-Flow Imaging
- •26.6.1 Color Doppler Imaging (CDI)
- •26.6.2 Power Doppler Imaging (PDI)
- •26.7.1 Stenosis Measurement
- •26.7.1.1 Diameter Stenosis
- •26.7.1.2 Area Stenosis
- •26.7.1.3 Residual Luminal Diameter
- •26.7.2 Occlusion
- •26.7.3 Subtotal Stenosis: (>95% Stenosis)
- •26.7.4 Long Segment Stenosis
- •26.8 Doppler Spectrum
- •26.10 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEU)
- •26.11.1 Common Carotid Artery
- •26.11.2 Internal Carotid Artery
- •26.11.2.1 Stenosis
- •26.11.2.2 Dissection
- •26.11.2.3 Occlusion
- •26.11.2.4 Subtotal Occlusion: (95–99% Stenosis)
- •26.11.2.5 Multiple (Tandem) Stenosis
- •26.11.2.6 Long Segment Stenosis
- •26.11.3 External Carotid Artery (ECA)
- •26.11.3.1 Occlusion
- •26.13 Negative Report
- •26.14 Conclusion
- •Algorithm
- •References
- •27.1 Introduction
- •27.2 Anatomy: Vertebrobasilar System
- •27.3 Vertebrobasilar Circulation: Ultrasound Examination
- •27.4 TCD: Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- •27.4.1 Delayed Cerebral Ischemia
- •27.4.2 Vasospasm
- •27.5 TCD: Vertebrobasilar Dissection
- •27.6 TCD: Intracranial Stenosis
- •27.7 TCD: Microembolus Detection
- •27.9 Subclavian Steal Syndrome
- •27.10 TCD: Multimodal Monitoring
- •27.11 TCD: Traumatic Brain Injury
- •27.12 TCD: Brain Death Determination
- •27.13 Conclusion
- •References
- •28.1 Introduction
- •28.2 Cerebral Venous System: Anatomy
- •28.3 vTCCS: Ultrasound Investigation Technique
- •28.4 CVST: Venous Ultrasound Findings

23 Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) in the Neuro-ICU: Usefulness of Transcranial…
ab
c d
407
Fig. 23.3 New robotic TCD system TCD = transcranial Doppler. Panel (a): Head band holder for
bilateral robotic controlled TCD probes. Solid black arrow denotes the encased robotic control
system. Dashed arrow indicates black TCD probe, which is automatically moved by robotic device
in response to automated signal detection algorithm. Panel (b): Robotic TCD touch-screen monitor. Panel (c): Bilateral TCD recording in real time. Panel (d): Robotic TCD probed controlling
system displaying various probes positions insonated automatically via robotic system, with colorcoded intensities

408
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT(ICU)
CTA/CTP, MRP, etc.
F. A. Zeiler and J. Teitelbaum
Algorithm
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT(ED)
Clinical Status of the Patient
ABCD
Level of consciousness(GCS)
BilateralPupillary reactivity?
Hemodynamic stability?
Oxygenation?
Mechanical Ventilation?
CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
Non-Contrast BrainCT scan
H&H Scale / Fisher Scale/ WFNS
DIAGNOSIS
SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE (SAH)
Multimodal Monitoring (MMM)
Transcranial Color-Coded duplex Sonography (TCCS)
CBFV < 85 cm/sec CBFV 85-120 cm/sec CBFV 120-180 cm/sec CBFV < 200cm/sec
No CVS
No Hyperemia
LR 3-4LR 4-5LR > 5Yes
Hyperemia
CVSvsHyp eremia
Transcranial Doppler (TCD)
LR 5-6LR 3-4
Clinical
Symptoms?
Likely CVS NO
Complete with
clinical exam
+/-
Vascular
Neuroimaging
Severe CVS
LR > 6
Treat as
DCI
S/SS/S
Optimize fluid
YES NO YES NO
CVS / DCI
CVSv.s Hyperemia ?
Use adjunctive Test:
status &
monitor
ABCD Airway-Breathing-Circulation-Disability, LR Lindegaard Ratio, DCI Delayed cerebral
ischemica, CBFV Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity, S/S Signs – Symptoms, VS Vasospasm, WFNS
Word Federation of neurosurgeons scale, H&H Hunt & Hess scale, CVS Cerebral vasospasm
References
1. Solenski NJ, Haley EC Jr, Kassell NF, Kongable G, Germanson T, Truskowski L, etal. Medical
complications of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a report of the multicenter, cooperative aneurysm study. Participants of the Multicenter Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Crit Care
Med. 1995;23(6):1007–17.

23 Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) in the Neuro-ICU: Usefulness of Transcranial…
2. Hop JW, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J.Case-fatality rates and functional outcome after sub-
arachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Stroke. 1997;28(3):660–4.
3. Kassell NF, Sasaki T, Colohan AR, Nazar G.Cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal sub-
arachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1985;16(4):562–72.
4. Diringer MN, Bleck TP, Claude Hemphill J 3rd, Menon D, Shutter L, Vespa P, etal. Neurocritical
Care Society. Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus
Conference. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(2):211–40.
5. Francoeur CL, Mayer SA.Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hem-
orrhage. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):277.
6. Budohoski KP, Guilfoyle M, Helmy A, Huuskonen T, Czosnyka M, Kirollos R, Menon DK,
etal. The pathophysiology and treatment of delayed cerebral ischaemia following subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(12):1343–53.
7. Dorsch N.A clinical review of cerebral vasospasm and delayed ischaemia following aneurysm
rupture. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;110(Pt 1):5–6.
8. de Rooij NK, Rinkel GJ, Dankbaar JW, Frijns CJ.Delayed cerebral ischemia after subarach-
noid hemorrhage: a systematic review of clinical, laboratory, and radiological predictors.
Stroke. 2013;44(1):43–54.
9. Washington CW, Zipfel GJ, Participants in the International Multi-disciplinary Consensus
Conference on the Critical care management of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Detection and
monitoring of vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia: a review and assessment of the literature. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(2):312–7.
10. D’Andrea A, Conte M, Cavallaro M, Scarale R, Riegler L, Cocchia R, et al. Transcranial
Doppler ultrasonography: from methodology to major clinical applications. World J Cardiol.
2016;8(7):383–400.
11. Kalanuria A, Nyquist PA, Armonda RA, Razumovsky A.Use of transcranial Doppler (TCD)
ultrasound in the neurocritical care unit. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013;24(3):441–56.
12. Purkayastha S, Sorond F.Transcranial Doppler ultrasound: technique and application. Semin
Neurol. 2012;32(4):411–20.
13. Alexandrov AV, Demchuk AM, Burgin WS.Insonation method and diagnostic ow signatures
for transcranial power motion (M-mode) Doppler. J Neuroimaging. 2002;12(3):236–44.
14. Kumar G, Shahripour RB, Harrigan MR.Vasospasm on transcranial Doppler is predictive of
delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(5):1257–64.
15. Zeiler FA, Donnelly J, Calviello L, Menon DK, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M. Pressure auto-
regulation measurement techniques in adult traumatic brain injury, part I: a scoping review of
intermittent/semi-intermittent methods. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(23):3207–23.
16. Zeiler FA, Donnelly J, Calviello L, Smielewski P, Menon DK, Czosnyka M. Pressure auto-
regulation measurement techniques in adult traumatic brain injury, part II: a scoping review of
continuous methods. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(23):3224–37.
17. Rivera-Lara L, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Geocadin R, Ziai W, Healy R, Thompson R, etal. Predictors
of outcome with cerebral autoregulation monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Crit Care Med. 2017;45(4):695–704.
18. Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Varsos GV, Kasprowicz M, Brady KM, et al.
Cerebral autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of three methods. J Cereb
Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(3):449–56.
19. Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Steiner L, Belestri M, Piechnik S, Pickard JD.ICM+: software for
on-line analysis of bedside monitoring data after severe head trauma. Acta Neurochir Suppl.
2005;95:43–9.
20. Guendling K, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Lewis P, Nortje J, Timofeev I, Hutchinson PJ,
Pickard JD.Use of ICM+ software for on-line analysis of intracranial and arterial pressures in
head-injured patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006;96:108–13.
409

410
21. Fraser CD 3rd, Brady KM, Rhee CJ, Easley RB, Kibler K, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Kaczka
DW, Andropoulos DB, Rusin C.The frequency response of cerebral autoregulation. J Appl
Physiol (1985). 2013;115(1):52–6.
22. Sorrentino E, Budohoski KP, Kasprowicz M, Smielewski P, Matta B, Pickard JD, Czosnyka
M.Critical thresholds for transcranial Doppler indices of cerebral autoregulation in traumatic
brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14(2):188–93.
23. Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, Kirkpatrick PJ.The role of monitoring cerebral autoregulation
after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2015;62(Suppl 1):180–4.
24. Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, Kirkpatrick PJ, Smielewski P, Steiner LA, Pickard JD.Clinical
relevance of cerebral autoregulation following subarachnoid haemorrhage. Nat Rev Neurol.
2013;9(3):152–63.
25. Calviere L, Nasr N, Arnaud C, Czosnyka M, Viguier A, Tissot B, Sol JC, Larrue V.Prediction
of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage using cerebral blood ow velocities and cerebral autoregulation assessment. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(2):253–8.
26. Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kasprowicz M, Helmy A, Bulters D, Pickard JD,
Kirkpatrick PJ.Impairment of cerebral autoregulation predicts delayed cerebral ischemia after
subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective observational study. Stroke. 2012;43(12):3230–7.
27. Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, Kirkpatrick PJ, Reinhard M, Varsos GV, Kasprowicz M, Ząbek
M, Pickard JD, Smielewski P.Bilateral failure of cerebral autoregulation is related to unfavorable outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2015;22(1):65–73.
28. Khan MN, Shallwani H, Khan MU, Shamim MS.Noninvasive monitoring intracranial pres-
sure– a review of available modalities. Surg Neurol Int. 2017;8:51.
29. Cardim D, Robba C, Bohdanowicz M, Donnelly J, Cabella B, Liu X, Cabeleira M, Smielewski
P, Schmidt B, Czosnyka M.Non-invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: is it possible? Neurocrit Care. 2016;25(3):473–91.
F. A. Zeiler and J. Teitelbaum

Chapter 24
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
andEndovascular Treatment: Usefulness
ofTranscranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS)
forCerebral Hemodynamic Monitoring
LauraLlullEstrany
Key Points
1. Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a devastating disease with high morbidity
and mortality. Delayed cerebral ischemia due to vasospasm is one of the main
hemodynamic complications. Up to 30% of patients may develop delayed cerebral ischemia related to vasospasm. Early detection can guide clinical decisions
at patient’s bedside.
2. Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS) is an accessible and reproducible tool, appli-
cable for the monitoring of cerebral blood ow velocities (CBFVs) and hemodynamic indexes derived from them.
3. The use of Echo-contrast may increase the sensitivity of the detection of unrup-
tured intracranial aneurysms and their recanalization after endovascular
treatment.
4. New technologies of TCD can improve its sensitivity. It allows intraoperative
and continuous monitoring in patients at high risk of developing vasospasm.
24.1 Introduction
Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS) is a non-invasive method with numerous clinical
applications in critically ill patients with acute brain injury (ABI). In addition to diagnostic and monitoring of vasospasm in patients with SAH, the use of TCD has
recently been extended to the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms.
TCD is performed by a low-frequency transducer (≤2MHz) through acoustic
window in the skull (bone window or natural hole), allowing visualization of basal
cerebral arteries and measuring CBFVs in different clinical scenarios [1] (Fig.24.1).
L. Llull Estrany (*)
Cerebral Vascular Pathology Unit, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
e-mail: llull.laura@gmail.com
C. N. Rodríguez et al. (eds.), Neurosonology in Critical Care,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81419-9_24
411© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022

412
Fig. 24.1 Image obtained by TCCS: transtemporal acoustic window showing the circle of Willis
in a patient with SAH.MCA middle cerebral artery, ACA anterior cerebral artery, PCA posterior
cerebral artery, PcomA posterior communicating artery
L. Llull Estrany
24.2 Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH): Epidemiology
andPathophysiology
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a disease with high morbidity and mortality
with high social impact [2]. SAH is the third most common cerebrovascular disorder (after intracranial hemorrhage and acute ischemic stroke). Approximately 80%
of spontaneous, non-traumatic SAH result from aneurysm rupture [2, 3]. Worldwide,
incidence is approximately 9.1/100,000 adults. In the USA, the incidence of SA is
higher in woman (2:1), African Americans, Hispanics, and above 55-year-olds.
After SAH triggers the activation of numerous deleterious mechanisms: (1)
increased intracranial pressure; (2) decreased cerebral blood ow (CBF); (3) impairment of cerebral auto-regulation (CA); and (4) exposure to inammation and cerebral metabolism changes. All of these clinical circumstances can lead to the
appearance of early secondary brain injury, occurring most commonly in the rst
72h after bleeding [3, 4].
SAH patients are at high risk for multiple complications in the weeks following
their initial bleed. Delayed cerebral ischemia (usually present after the rst 72h
from symptom onset) is the second most common cause of morbidity and mortality
after the early brain injury of the initial SAH and is most commonly due to arterial
vasospasm. Both early and delayed cerebral ischemia have been established as
important predictors of poor prognosis [2], and it is accepted that their pathogenesis
is multifactorial. The exact underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain
unknown.

24 Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Endovascular Treatment: Usefulness…
413
24.2.1 Vasospasm
Vasospasm, the leading cause of delayed cerebral ischemia, is one of the major
complications of SAH.Vasospasm is dened as a CBF reduction induced by vasoconstriction of intracranial arteries not attributable to: atherosclerosis, spasm
induced by catheter manipulation, or vessel hypoplasia. It occurs in up to 70% of
patients between 3 and 14 days after initial bleeding (has been reported up to
21days). Vasospasm becomes symptomatic in 20–40% of patients and is considered responsible for 20% of morbidity and mortality in SAH [5].
The main risk factors for the appearance of vasospasm include initial clinical
severity, the amount of bleeding, and the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage
(IVH) [6]. Therefore, vasospasm has a multifactorial origin.
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is considered the gold standard technique
for vasospasm detection (CT angiography may be a valid option). However, DSA is an
invasive technique and therefore not applicable if serial monitoring is required. On the
other hand, TCD/TCCS is a non-invasive, repeatable, and low-cost method that allows
the diagnosis and daily monitoring of vasospasm of critically ill patients in the ICU.
TCD/TCCS is a useful and reliable method for the detection of hemodynamic
changes. Therefore, it is considered a suitable tool for daily monitoring of vasospasm and early diagnosis of neurological worsening related to vasospasm.
In many institutions, TCD (as a blind technique) has been used as a tool for cerebral vasospasm monitoring due to its reproducibility and ability to detect variations
in cerebral hemodynamics. However, TCD is an operator-dependent technique and
that the measurement can be inuenced by the angle of insonation, giving rise to
under- or overestimates of CBFVs values.
The hemodynamic parameters most commonly measured are: (1) CBFVs (Peak
systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and mean ow velocity (MFV)),
(2) direction of CBFVs, (3) spectral Doppler waveform analysis (ow patterns), (4)
sound (turbulence or attenuation cerebral blood ow), and (5) hemodynamic indexes/
ratios: pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and Lindegaard ratio (LR).
In recent years, most centers have incorporated transcranial color-coded duplex
sonography (TCCS) methodology. The main advantage of TCCS is the visualization of intracranial vessels (B-mode), which allows for a targeted evaluation of each
arterial segment and its corresponding CBFVs [7, 8]. The direct visualization of the
cerebral basal arteries (circle of Willis) through color-Doppler mode allows the
detection of segments in main arteries of anterior and posterior circulation, facilitating the detection of hemodynamic alterations secondary to vasospasm [9].
The MFV in cerebral basal arteries is directly proportional to CBF and inversely
proportional to the section area of the insonated vessel, where any clinical situation
that causes a variation of vessel diameter will affect the MFV.Hence, vasospasm is
one of the most common causes of increased MFV after SAH.CBFVs that dene
the severity of vasospasm are clearly established for the MCA, but not for the ACA,
PCA, and BA [10].
Progressive or persistent elevation in CBFV may be due to hyperemia or vasospasm, where LR (relationship of MFV between MCA and extra cranial portion of

414
Fig. 24.2 TCCS insonation performed on a patient with aneurysmal SAH (MCA) in which moderate vasospasm and artifact corresponding to the presence of the coils used are observed
L. Llull Estrany
ICA) allows for the differentiation between them, while helping to classify the vasospasm severity (Fig.24.2).
There have been reports in the literature of another ratio obtained by TCD/TCCS
that correlates better with vasospasm than MFV measurement in patients with SAH.
This ratio has been calculated from the relationship between MFV in the ipsilateral MCA (dened ipsilateral MCA where highest CBFV) and MFV of the contralateral MCA (ipsilateral MFV
/contralateral MFV
MCA
). The value of this ratio to
MCA
predict DCI was more auspicious than MFV measurement. The cut-off value that
best discriminated the risk of DCI was 1.5 [11].
24.2.2 Vasospasm Diagnostic Criteria
Adapted from Marshal etal. [12].
24.2.2.1 Diagnostic Criteria of Vasospasm (VSP) by TCD/TCCS inMCA
Major (severe vasospasm):
• Change in MFV with respect to baseline greater than 50cm/s
• Mean ow velocity (MFV) >200cm/s
• Lindegaard ratio >6

24 Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Endovascular Treatment: Usefulness…
415
Minor (moderate vasospasm):
• Mean ow velocity (MFV) >120cm/s
• Lindegaard ratio >3
It is necessary to consider the appearance of a decrease in the CBFV in the poststenotic segment and the appearance of CBF turbulence when the degree of stenosis, secondary to vasospasm, is higher than 50% of diameter of the insonated
vessel [10].
Due to the segmental nature of vasospasm and the need for daily monitoring by
TCD/TCCS, it is important to identify the arterial segment affected. Therefore, it is
convenient to record the MFV measurement corresponding to the depth of each segment of each cerebral basal artery insonated for a real-time control at the patient’s
bedside in the ICU.
In patients with SAH admitted to the ICU, daily monitoring using TCCS methodology can be useful to dene the need for neuroimaging (CT, MRI, CTA, DSA)
to evaluate brain parenchyma impact and/or decide intra-arterial therapy (angioplasty or drug administration) [13].
The prevalence of early angiographic vasospasm, dened as the appearance of
angiographic vasospasm in the rst 48h after SAH, is estimated at around 10%. In
some studies, the presence of vasospasm on admission has been identied as an
independent prognostic factor in this patients [14, 15]. Patients with intracerebral
hematoma, intraventricular hemorrhage, large aneurysm size (>12mm), and MCA
aneurysms appear to have a greater risk of early vasospasm [16].
24.3 TCD/TCCS: Cerebral Vasoreactivity
Dilatation of the cerebral arterioles results in a reduction in cerebrovascular resistance (CVR) allowing CBF to increase in the proximal segments of the cerebral
basal arteries. While arteriolar vasoconstriction increases CVR and therefore causes
CBF reduction. Cerebral vasoreactivity is the vasoconstriction and vasodilatation
capacity of intracranial vessels after stimulus (e.g. vasoactive drugs) and is a measure of the integrity of CA.Vasoreactivity can be assessed measuring by CBFV
changes. Those hemodynamic changes can be measured by TCD/TCCS [17, 18].
Cerebral vasoreactivity can be assessed by TCD/TCCS after acetazolamide
administration in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms [19, 20]. In these
trials, vasoreactivity was normal in both brain hemispheres, and the location of the
aneurysm did not inuence the nal results. Likewise, the development of vasospasm in the acute stage of SAH did not cause an alteration in cerebral
vasoreactivity.
Since the inuence of cerebral vasoreactivity on vasospasm development has
been proposed, researchers evaluated the existence of differences in hemodynamic
response of cerebral basal arteries after acetazolamide administration in a group of
37 patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysm [21] and detected no differences

416
between affected and non-affected brain hemisphere or between subjects with aneurysm compared to healthy subjects.
These results suggest that patients with unruptured aneurysm have no alterations
in cerebral vasoreactivity after aneurysm treatment (e.g., clipping, coiling).
L. Llull Estrany
24.4 TCD/TCCS: Intraoperative Monitoring
Several intraoperative monitoring modalities, including indocyanine angiography,
electrophysiological studies, and micro-Doppler ultrasonography, are used to verify
correct positioning of the surgical clip to secure cerebral aneurysm. Siasios etal. in
2012 [22] studied a series of 19 patients in whom micro-Doppler had been performed during surgery. In all of these patients, the high diagnostic capacity of this
technique was demonstrated.
Given the technical difculties of microsurgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms and the accessibility and reliability of intraoperative ultrasonography, its use
as a complementary tool during aneurysm clipping could be considered with the
intention to minimize the risk of intraoperative complications or improper clip
placement.
24.5 Detection ofIntracranial Aneurysms
andRecanalization ofTreated Aneurysms
Recanalization of the aneurysmal neck is a complication that can appear after treatment, so long-term follow-up and detection of this recanalization is relevant.
Power Doppler mode is an accessible and non-invasive technique for anterior
circulation aneurysms detection, but less sensitive than other diagnostic methods
(e.g. DSA, CTA, MR angiography). The sensitivity of power Doppler is low for
small aneurysms (<5mm). Also, the terminal segment of the ICA is the most difcult to interpret [23] (Fig.24.3).
The use of non-invasive imaging techniques such as TCD/TCCS, capable of
detecting the residual neck in a secured aneurysm, would signicantly reduce diagnostic costs, as well as potential complications, radiation exposure, and the use of
radiological contrast.
Turner etal. in 2005 [24] evaluated the ability of TCCS with and without an
echo-contrast to detect aneurysmal neck recanalization in patients with secured
intracranial aneurysms by coiling. The authors reported that their results compared
with those of the arteriography. The sensitivity of TCCS was approximately 80%
for the detection of occluded aneurysms and, in the case of recanalized aneurysms,
TCCS sensitivity increased as the degree of recanalization of the neck increases.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
