Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5783_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
40 Мб
Скачать
Material Speed
Acoustic impedance
1520 1.52 x 10
6 Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound: Physical Principles
101
6.2.1 Speed ofUltrasound inTissue
The speed of sound in tissue is important for a number of reasons. It must be known in order to convert the time delay between the transmission of a pulse and the sub­sequent reception of echoes into physical distances, it determines the maximum rate at which pulses can be transmitted (it is usually necessary to wait until all the rele­vant echoes from one pulse return to the transducer before another is transmitted), it determines the wavelength of the ultrasound (and hence resolution), it determines the amount of refraction that takes place at tissue interfaces, and it is needed to convert Doppler shift frequencies into tissue velocities. The speed of sound in tissue depends on the elastic properties and density of the tissue, and in general the less compressible the tissue the higher the speed of sound, so that, for example, ultra­sound propagates much more rapidly through bone than through soft tissue. Table6.1 gives approximate values for the speed of sound in some relevant tissues. The important thing to note from this table is that, with the exception of air and bone, all the values are very similar, at around 1540ms value for air is much lower, but since ultrasound does not propagate through air this is of little signicance; the value for bone is much higher, which is of some rele­vance when performing transcranial examinations. Taking the value of 1540ms−1 as representative, it is easy to calculate that it takes pulses of ultrasound approximately
6.5μs to travel 1cm, and therefore, to convert the delay between the transmission of a pulse and the reception of an echo into a depth (remembering that it will take 13μs for a round trip of 1cm). Ultrasound scanners do this automatically, but it should be noted that a scanner has no way of telling what tissues the pulse has trav­elled through, and must use the same conversion factor for all acoustic paths. Because the speed of sound is much higher in bone than soft tissue, the apparent thickness of bone will be less than half its actual thickness. This may not matter
1
(metres per second). The
Table 6.1 Speed of sound and acoustic impedance of some common materials
(metres per second)
Air Aqueous humour Blood Bone
Brain Fat Lens of eye Muscle Soft tissue average Vitreous humour
330 0.0004 x 10 1500 1.50 x 10 1570 1.61 x 10 3500 7.80 x 10 1540 1.58 x 10 1450 1.38 x 10 1620 1.84 x 10 1580 1.70 x 10 1540 1.63 x 10
(rayls)
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
102
()
()
g/II
Material Attenuation
0.7
D. H. Evans
when making transcranial measurements on the brain through a relatively small aperture because it may simply mean the entire image is shifted, but where there are signicant variations in the thickness of bone underlying the transducer it can intro­duce undesirable distortions into the image of the brain. Knowing the speed of ultra­sound enables us to calculate the wavelength (given by sound speed divided by frequency) which gives us an idea of the best spatial resolution available from the technique, and which in soft tissue will be approximately 0.77mm at 2MHz and
0.1mm at 15MHz.
6.2.2 Attenuation ofUltrasound by Tissue
As ultrasound propagates through tissue, it is attenuated; that is to say the energy in the beam is reduced. This happens through two main mechanisms: absorption and scattering. Absorption is the conversion of the mechanical energy in the beam into heat (which will cause a temperature rise in the tissue– see section on ultrasound safety), while scattering is the process by which energy is redirected out of the beam. In most soft tissue, the most important mechanism is absorption, but in blood scattering dominates. Attenuation varies from tissue to tissue, and is strongly fre­quency dependent. It is usually measured in decibels (dB), and may be written as (Eq.6.1):
AttenuationdB
=−
10
lo
10 0
x
where I0 is the initial intensity and Ix is the nal intensity. Thus, if the nal intensity is one-tenth of the initial intensity, the attenuation is said to be 10dB; likewise reductions in intensity to be one-hundredth and one-thousandth of the initial inten­sity would be written as 20 dB and -30 dB respectively. Typical values of the attenuation of 1MHz ultrasound in some biological materials are given in Table6.2. With the exception of water, the attenuation coefcients for higher frequencies may be obtained approximately by multiplying the attenuation at 1 MHz by the fre­quency in MHz. For example, the attenuation in soft tissue at 2MHz would be
Table 6.2 Attenuation coefcients for some biological materials at 1MHz. The values at a higher frequency may be obtained approximately by multiplying by the frequency in MHz (note however that for water the value should be multiplied by the square of frequency)
Blood Bone Brain (adult) Brain (infant) Fat Muscle Water Soft tissue average
coefficient at 1 MHz
(dB cm–1)
0.2
10
0.8
0.3
0.6
1.5
0.002
(6.1)
6 Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound: Physical Principles
103
1.4dBcm−1, and at 10MHz would be 7dBcm−1. The strong frequency dependency of attenuation is the factor that limits the highest frequency that can be used in any particular situation (ideally we would always use the highest frequency possible because the shorter the wavelength, the better the spatial resolution). The higher the attenuation coefcient, the higher the frequency, and the deeper the target, the smaller will be the returning echoes. We are able to obtain very high-resolution images of arteries like the extra-cranial carotid arteries because they are relatively supercial and the overlying tissue has a relatively low attenuation coefcient; the same is not true for deep vessels. The rapid attenuation of ultrasound by bone means that if we wish to insonate through the skull, we have to use relatively low ultra­sound frequencies (note, however, that the poor resolution we obtain when imaging the brain is a result of both using a low frequency and the distortion of the ultra­sound beam by the skull bone).
6.2.3 Ultrasound Behaviour at Acoustic Boundaries
Ultrasonic imaging is reliant on variations in the acoustic properties of tissues to generate the echoes that reveal the range and direction of target structures. The behaviour of sound when it encounters a change in acoustic properties depends on the relative dimensions of the ultrasound wavelength and the target in its path. If the target is small compared with the wavelength (such as the case with a red blood cell or the inhomogeneities in the parenchyma of an organ), then the wave is said to be scattered. If the target is large (such as the case at the interface between two organs), then the wave is said to be reected or refracted. Both types of behaviour are impor­tant in ultrasonic scanning. In the case of scattering, the incident energy is retrans­mitted in all directions (though not necessarily equally), while in the case of reection and refraction, the energy remains conned to a well-dened, reected and transmitted beam.
Figure 6.1a, b illustrate the behaviour of ultrasound at a plain boundary for per­pendicular and non-perpendicular incidence respectively. In the rst case, a propor­tion of the ultrasound is reected directly back to the source (the angle of incidence and reection are both equal to zero), and a proportion continues along the original path. In the second case, the angle of incidence and reection are also equal, but not to zero, and therefore, the reected wave does not return to the transducer (this is why it is much easier to image large surfaces that are perpendicular to the ultra­sound beam). In the second case, there is also a transmitted wave, but its direction depends both on the angle of incidence and the relative speeds of ultrasound on either side of the boundary. The relationship between the angle of the incident wave
θ
and the transmitted wave θt is given by Eq.6.2:
i
sin
θ
c
i
1
=
sin
θ
c
2
t
(6.2)
104
a
Scattered
D. H. Evans
Fig. 6.1 (a) Reection of
Interface
ultrasound at a plane boundary (perpendicular incidence). (b) Reection and refraction of ultrasound at a plane boundary (non-
Source
Incident
Z
Z
1
2
Transmitted
perpendicular incidence). (c) Scattering of ultrasound by a target with dimensions smaller or comparable to
Reflected
the ultrasound wavelength
b
Source
Incident
θ
i
θ
r
Reflected
Interface
Z
1
Z
2
Transmitted
refracted
θ
t
c
Source
Incident
where c1 is the sound speed before the boundary and c2 the speed after the boundary. If the speeds of sound on either side of the boundary are similar, the direction of propagation changes very little, but if they are dissimilar then the direction may change signicantly (i.e. it is said to be refracted). Refraction effects are particularly important at interfaces between soft tissue and bone (recall the speed of sound in bone is 2 to 3 times higher than in soft tissue), and can lead to considerable distor­tion as an ultrasound beam propagates through the skull. The proportion of energy reected at a boundary depends on the difference in the acoustic impedance on the two sides of the boundary and for normal incidence may be written (Eq.6.3):
ZZ
ZZ
21
21
6 Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound: Physical Principles
105
I
r
α
==
r
I
i
− 
+
(6.3)
where Ii and Ir are the incident and reected intensities, and Z1 and Z2 are the acous­tic impedance of the tissue before the boundary and after the boundary, respectively. If Z1 and Z2 are similar, then most of the energy is transmitted and little reected; if
Z1 and Z2 are very dissimilar, then the converse is true. Values of acoustic impedance
for some relevant tissues are given in Table6.1. It can be seen that the values for most soft tissues are very similar, but that air has a very low value and bone has a relatively high value. The result of this is that the percentage of energy reected at soft tissue interfaces is of the order of 1%, but that, at soft tissue/bone interfaces, approximately 50% of the energy is reected. The impedance of air is so low that effectively no transmission at all takes place at a soft tissue/air interface. The low acoustic impedance of air is the main reason why it is impossible to image through air and why it is essential to exclude air from the interface between the transducer and the skin.
Figure 6.1c illustrates the phenomenon of scattering. Scattering is important because it is the process that allows us to image the parenchyma of organs and to image blood ow. The scattering pattern and the amount of scattering that occur at a target depend on the size of the target, and the distribution of compressibility and density in the target volume. For targets that are very much smaller than the ultra­sound wavelength, the wave is scattered more or less uniformly in all directions, while for larger targets, the scattering pattern is more complex but still takes place over a wide range of angles. For very small targets, such as red blood cells, the scat­tering is called Rayleigh scattering and is proportional to the fourth power of fre­quency; for larger targets, the scattered power still increases with frequency but less rapidly so. The power returned to the ultrasound transducer by scattering is much less than that returned by specular reectors, but is also much less angle dependent. Therefore, echoes from the internal structure of organs and from blood are much weaker than those from distinct boundaries, but do not change signicantly as the angle of insonation changes.

6.3 Pulse-Echo Principles (B-Mode Techniques)

The basic principle behind B-scanning has been described in the introduction. A B-mode display is essentially a cross-sectional image of the tissue in the scan plane, built up using an echo ranging technique. A transducer transmits a short ultrasound pulse into the tissue in a predetermined direction, then switches to receive mode and gathers echoes due to reection or scattering in the tissue from that same direction. Since the direction of transmission and reception and the time delay between pulse transmission and echo reception are known, the position of any structure producing an echo can be determined. The size of each of the echoes provides information
106
D. H. Evans
about the amount of ultrasound reected or scattered by the structure (although it is necessary to compensate for the attenuation of the pulse by intervening tissue). Once all the echoes have been received from depths of interest, then another pulse is transmitted along a slightly different path, and the whole process repeated until the required plane, perpendicular to the transducer face, has been interrogated. The rate at which pulses can be transmitted (the pulse repetition frequency or PRF) is limited by the speed of ultrasound in the tissue and the maximum depth of interest; so, for example, if it is required to image to a depth of 10cm, it will be necessary to wait 13μs × 10, that is, 130μs, before another pulse is transmitted. Clearly consid­erable processing by the ultrasound scanner is necessary to produce acceptable images from the simple echo information described above, and the interested reader is referred to Hoskins etal. [1] for further information.

6.4 Transducers

At one time the method used for scanning the ultrasound beam through tissue involved physical movements within the transducer. All transducers for B-scan imaging are now array transducers where the beam is steered electronically. There are two basic types of arrays: linear arrays and phased arrays, both of which contain a large number of very small piezoelectric elements capable of transmitting and receiving ultrasound.
In linear arrays, each beam is generated using only a limited number of adjacent array elements at any one time. Each successive beam is generated by selecting another group of elements, so if the rst beam is generated using elements 1–8, for example, then the second beam might be generated using elements 2–9 and so on. Thus, the beam steps along the array. Linear array transducers produce rectangular­or parallelogram-shaped elds where all the scan lines are parallel to each other, and are the transducers of choice for imaging the extra-cranial carotid arteries.
In phased arrays, each beam is generated using most or even all of the elements at the same time. Each successive beam is generated by steering the direction of transmission and reception by appropriate phasing of the signals applied to the transducer elements. Phased arrays produce sector-shaped elds where the scan lines are not parallel to each other and are the transducers of choice for intracranial imaging because their small footprint, which allows them to be used with the lim­ited acoustic windows available in the skull.
Modern ultrasound systems not only move the beam electronically, but dynami­cally vary their aperture (the number of elements used) and apodisation (relative weighting of the contribution of different elements), and also use electronic focus­sing on both transmit (multiple-zone focussing) and receive (dynamic focussing) to achieve excellent lateral resolution in the scan plane. Some modern transducers also use more than one row of elements to improve the focussing in the elevation plane (i.e. the out of plain dimension or the slice thickness).
6 Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound: Physical Principles
107

6.5 Artefacts

It is important that users of ultrasound instruments are aware of the many image artefacts that can arise. Two of the most important types are described briey below.
6.5.1 Speed ofSound andBeam Deviation Artefacts
To generate ultrasound images, it is necessary to assume that the beam has followed a straight path through the tissue, and that the speed of sound in the tissue is con­stant and known. Anything that invalidates these assumptions will lead to misregis­tration of targets. Beam direction may be changed either by refraction effects (i.e. where the beam meets a boundary between two tissues with different ultrasound velocities, at nonnormal incidence), or by very strong specular reectors that are not at right angles to the beam. Deviations from the assumed velocity of sound will make targets appear closer or farther away than they should. If the tissue with the higher or lower velocity is a parallel-sided layer, then all the structures behind the layer will be moved so as to appear closer or further from the transducer, which may not matter. On the other hand, if the layer is not parallel sided or is incomplete, then some parts of the structure behind the layer will be moved more than others, so that a straight boundary might appear ragged. Strong specular reectors, not at right angles to the beam, may act as acoustic mirrors completely redirecting the beam direction away from that assumed by the machine.
6.5.2 Shadowing andFlaring Artefacts
Attenuation of ultrasound in bodily tissues is very signicant so that echoes return­ing from deep structures are always very much smaller than those returning from similar supercial structures. In order to overcome this, ultrasound instruments employ what is known as time gain compensation (TGC) to the returning echoes, so that echoes from deeper structures are amplied more than those from supercial structures. In order to do this, the instrument needs to assume an average rate of attenuation in the tissue so it can calculate the appropriate gain to apply to echoes from each depth. Shadowing and aring artefacts occur when the attenuation is either underestimated or overestimated respectively. One common example of shad­owing occurs behind an atheromatous plaque in the carotid artery, where the plaque attenuates the ultrasound much more rapidly than soft tissue, and so the TGC does not adequately compensate for the reduction in the size of the echoes returning from behind the plaque. The converse effect can be seen when there is a cyst in the tissue. The uid in a cyst does not attenuate ultrasound as rapidly as soft tissue, but the TGC continues to increase gain with depth as though there is soft tissue present. The
108
vc
=−=
θ
=
θ
D. H. Evans
result of this is that the echoes from behind the cyst are amplied more than is appropriate, and the region behind the cyst appears to be very highly reecting. Although these are artefacts, they do in fact convey diagnostic information, in that they reveal the presence of tissue with an unexpectedly high or low attenua­tion values.

6.6 Doppler Principles

If an observer is stationary relative to a source of waves, then the frequency the observer measures is the same as the frequency transmitted. If, however, the observer is moving towards or away from the source of waves, then a greater or lesser num­ber of wave fronts will pass the observer in a given time interval, and so the observer will measure a higher or lower frequency than that which was transmitted. This effect is known as the Doppler effect after the Austrian physicist, Christian Doppler, who rst described the phenomenon in 1842. In medical ultrasound, the targets do not emit spontaneously, and therefore, to make use of this effect, it is necessary to transmit ultrasound into the body, and to observe the change of frequency as the wave is reected or scattered from the target. Under these conditions, it can be shown [2] that the ‘Doppler frequency’, fd, i.e. the difference between the transmit­ted frequency ft and the received frequency fr, is given by Eq.6.4:
ffff
dtrt
2cos /
(6.4)
where v is the velocity of the target, c the velocity of sound in tissue and θ the angle between the ultrasound beam and the direction of motion of the target. The velocity of sound and the transmitted frequency are known in any situation, and therefore, the velocity of a target can be found from Eq.6.5:
vf
Kcos
d
(6.5)
where K is a known constant (c/2ft). This equation may be used to monitor changes in velocity, and if the angle θ can be determined, then absolute velocity may be calculated. In practice, where blood ow is concerned, there will be many targets in the Doppler sample volume with a range of velocities, and so the Doppler shift sig­nal will contain a spectrum of frequencies. Figure6.2 shows the spectral display (usually called a sonogram) of the Doppler signal recorded from an internal carotid artery. The horizontal axis represents time, the vertical axis the Doppler shift fre­quency and the grey level of each pixel the power of the Doppler signal at the cor­responding frequency and time.
Under ‘ideal’ conditions, the spectrum of Doppler frequencies at any moment in time would correspond to the distribution of velocities in the sample volume, but there are a number of factors which distort the spectrum and limit the accuracy with which the velocity distribution can be determined (note also that the shape of the sample volume itself will mean that the ow within a vessel is unlikely to be
time
frequency
6 Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound: Physical Principles
Fig. 6.2 Sonogram of the Doppler signal from a normal internal carotid artery. The horizontal axis represents time, the vertical axis Doppler shift frequency (or velocity), and the grey scale the power of the Doppler shift frequency at the corresponding time and frequency. Three complete cardiac cycles are shown
109
sampled uniformly, and therefore, the distribution of velocities in the sample vol­ume may not exactly correspond to the distribution of velocities in the vessel). The reader is referred to Evans and McDicken [2] for an in-depth discussion of these effects, but the effect of ‘wall-thump’ lters is briey described here because of its importance. As already mentioned, the signals reected by structures such as blood vessel walls are orders of magnitude greater than those scattered by blood, and therefore, it is necessary to reject such signals if we wish to study the motion of the blood. This is possible because in general such solid structures move with much lower velocities than those of blood ow, and therefore, these signals can be rejected using a high- pass (wall-thump) lter. While this can be quite effective, the lter will also reject the signals from slowly moving blood. This means that blood ow close to a vessel wall cannot be studied, and that the mean blood ow velocity in a vessel tends to be slightly overestimated, although is not usually a major problem as long as the operator is aware of the effect.
6.6.1 Pulsed Wave Doppler
Early Doppler ultrasound devices were continuous-wave devices (that is to say they both transmitted and received ultrasound continuously), but such devices had little or no range resolution. Because in general it is important to be able to select signals from a particular depth, nearly all ultrasound Doppler instruments now use pulsed transmission. Pulses of ultrasound are transmitted at regular intervals, and after a xed (but controllable) delay, a receive gate attached to the transducer opens for a brief period of time and allows signals from a pre-determined range of depths to be collected for Doppler processing. The delay between pulse transmission and the opening of the receive gate determines the depth from which signal samples are col­lected, and the time for which the receive gate is open in combination with the transmitted pulse length determines the sample volume length.
110
D. H. Evans
Pulsed wave (PW) ultrasound systems actually operate by measuring the rate of change of phase of the returning ultrasound pulses rather than the Doppler shift frequency per se and because of this are subject to the effects of aliasing. Aliasing is the phenomenon that occurs when a moving object is not sampled sufciently rap­idly to be able to reconstruct its true movement. If a Doppler signal is to be correctly interpreted, then the rate at which it is sampled (i.e. the pulse repetition frequency)
(with certain caveats). Failure to respect this limit can lead to artefacts such as rapid forward ow being interpreted as reverse ow. The obvious way to avoid this prob­lem is to increase the PRF, but as we have already seen this is limited by the fact that if we wish to avoid range ambiguity we must collect all the returning echoes of interest before transmitting a subsequent pulse. It can be shown [2] that there is a maximum range-velocity product limit given by Eq.6.6:
where z
is the maximum range a PW system can gather echoes from unambigu-
max
ously and v
zv cf
is the maximum velocity that can be unambiguously measured.
max
/cos=28
θ
tmaxmax
(6.6)
Therefore, it is possible to measure high velocities in supercial structures correctly and low velocities in deep structures correctly, but not high velocities in deep struc­tures. This limit is particularly troublesome in cardiac work where there may be very high velocities through stenosed heart valves, but it is possible to encounter aliasing in more supercial structures such as stenosed carotid arteries. Equation 6.6 reveals that one of the ways to avoid aliasing is to use a lower transmitted ultrasound frequency, and this is one of the reasons why Doppler studies are often performed at slightly lower frequencies than imaging studies.
6.6.2 Duplex Scanning
Duplex scanners are scanners that combine B-mode imaging with PW Doppler measurements. The B-scan image is used to guide the Doppler beam and to place a Doppler sample volume in a region of interest. Since blood vessels may be imaged, the Doppler angle, θ, can also be measured (by assuming that the blood ow is par­allel to the vessel wall) and, therefore, the Doppler shift frequency can be calibrated in terms of blood ow velocity.
6.6.3 Colour Flow Imaging (CFI)
Colour ow imaging systems are similar to pulse-echo B-mode systems, except that both the amplitude and the ‘Doppler shift’ on the returning echoes are measured. Where no Doppler shift is detected, the usual grey-scale information is written to