Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5783_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
40 Мб
Скачать
9 Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS) and Cerebral Blood Flow Velocities: Parameters…
Table 9.10 Mean ow velocity (MFV) and pulsatility index (PI) values by sex [27]
Artery MFV (cm/s), SD PI, SD
Men Female Men Female
MCA(M1) 48.7±15.5 49.6±14.4 0.8±0.1 0.7±0.1 ACA(A1) 40.4±12.9 39.7±12.6 0.8±0.2 0.8±0.2 eICA 31.5±5 36.4±6.7 0.9±0.2 0.8±0.1 PCA(P1) 34±12.3 34.9±12.2 0.8±0.1 0.8±0.1 PCA(P2) 33.8±9.9 35±8.2 0.8±0.2 0.9±0.3 Basilar 32.5±8.9 39.2±10 0.8±0.2 0.8±0.2 V4 25.6±6 26.3±6.9 0.7±0.2 0.7±0.2
ACA anterior cerebral artery, ICA internal carotid artery, MCA middle cerebral artery, PCA poste- rior cerebral artery, SD standard deviation, MFV mean ow velocity
Table 9.11 Mean ow velocity (MFV) and pulsatility index (PI) by age [27]
Artery MFV (cm/s), SD PI, SD
<40years >40years <40years >40years
MCA(M1) 52.7±14.4 44.1±13.8 0.8±0.1 0.7±0.1 ACA(A1) 42.4±13 36.1±11 0.8±0.2 0.8±0.1 eICA 35.3±6.3 33.5±6.8 0.8±0.1 0.8±0.2 PCA(P1) 35.7±13.7 32.9±9.5 0.8±0.1 0.8±0.1 PCA(P2) 35.7±9.1 32.9±8.4 0.8±0.2 0.9±0.3 Basilar 37.4±11.3 35.7±8.1 0.8±0.1 0.8±0.2 V4 25.7±6.2 26.5±7.1 0.7±0.2 0.7±0.2
ACA anterior cerebral artery, ICA internal carotid artery, MCA middle cerebral artery, PCA poste- rior cerebral artery, SD standard deviation, MFV mean ow velocity
173
between the two groups. In the posterior circulation, the inter-hemispheric differ­ences were fewer and not statistically signicant.
The hemodynamic parameters recorded using TCD differ from those published in other series with subjects with no history of disease. The lower CBFV values recorded appear to be inuenced by altitude and haematocrit [28]. Hence, the con­sideration of these results could have an impact on the assessment and therapeutic decisions in patients with acute neurological injury.
9.9 TCD Hemodynamic Parameters: Recommendations
forLocal Assessment ofNormal Values
Reference values for a local population should be constructed by insonating healthy subjects at rest in a calm and comfortable setting. The operator should be an expert in the TCD technique, and it is preferable to limit the number of operators in order to avoid potential bias of inter-observer variability, although if the operators have similar level of expertise the variability should be non-signicant [4].
174
J. H. Mejía Mantilla et al.
The sample should include subjects of both sexes in similar proportions and a distribution of ages similar to the potential patient’s ages for the laboratory, for adult laboratory ages from 18 to 90years old. In order to obtain statistical power for each subgroup, there must be at least 10 subjects for each decade for each gender (A. Garcia, personal communication). Considering 10 to 15% of non-insonable window, it would be better to include 12 cases per decade [24].
The criteria for denition of normal or the criteria to include non-normal indi­viduals should be explicit, considered as part of the reference population of interest for the authors.

9.10 Conclusion

Transcranial Doppler ultrasound is an established technology useful to evaluate cerebral circulation at the bedside. Its portability, absence of irradiation and non­invasiveness make this approach especially useful in critically ill patients; further­more, TCD/TCCS can be repeated as many times as needed with no harm to the patient and at low cost, making TCD the most versatile way to evaluate cerebral circulation at the ICU.
The interpretation of TCD/TCCS is operator dependent and can be inuenced by the reference values considered normal for a given population; it is important for each TCD/TCCS laboratory to develop its own table of normal values for the local population.

References

1. Aaslid R, Markwalder TM, Nornes H.Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording
of ow velocity in basal cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg. 1982;57(6):769–74.
2. Bishop CC, Powell S, Rutt D, Browse NL.Transcranial Doppler measurement of middle cere-
bral artery blood ow velocity: a validation study. Stroke. 1986;17(5):913–5.
3. Lindegaard KF, Nornes H, Bakke SJ, Sorteberg W, Nakstad P. Cerebral vasospasm after
subarachnoid haemorrhage investigated by means of transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1988;42:81–4.
4. Maeda H, Etani H, Handa N, Tagaya M, Oku N, Kim BH, etal. A validation study on the
reproducibility of transcranial Doppler velocimetry. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(1):9–14.
5. Puppo Vallini BC.Doppler transcraneano en el paciente neurocrítico. Paciente crit (Uruguay).
2001:52–68.
6. Baumgartner I, Behrendt P, Rohner P, Baumgartner RW.A validation study on the intraob-
server and interobserver reproducibility of renal artery duplex ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;25(2):225–31.
7. Arnolds BJ, von Reutern GM.Transcranial Doppler sonography. Examination technique and
normal reference values. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1986;12(2):115–23.
8. Hennerici M, Rautenberg W, Sitzer G, Schwartz A.Transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the
assessment of intracranial arterial ow velocity--part 1. Examination technique and normal values. Surg Neurol. 1987;27(5):439–48.
9 Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS) and Cerebral Blood Flow Velocities: Parameters…
9. Sorteberg W, Langmoen IA, Lindegaard KF, Nornes H. Side-to-side differences and day-
to- day variations of transcranial Doppler parameters in normal subjects. J Ultrasound Med. 1990;9(7):403–9.
10. Vriens EM, Kraaier V, Musbach M, Wieneke GH, van Huffelen AC. Transcranial pulsed
Doppler measurements of blood velocity in the middle cerebral artery: reference values at rest and during hyperventilation in healthy volunteers in relation to age and sex. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1989;15(1):1–8.
11. Schmidt EA, Piechnik SK, Smielewski P, Raabe A, Matta BF, Czosnyka M.Symmetry of
cerebral hemodynamic indices derived from bilateral transcranial Doppler. J Neuroimaging. 2003;13(3):248–54.
12. Droste DW, Ludemann P, Anders F, Kemeny V, Thomas M, Krauss JK, etal. Middle cerebral
artery blood ow velocity, end-tidal pCO2 and blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and in healthy subjects during continuous positive airway pressure breathing. Neurol Res. 1999;21(8):737–41.
13. Macchi C, Catini C.The measurement of the calibers and blood-ow velocities of the arteries
of the circle of Willis: a statistical investigation of 120 living subjects using transcranial color­Doppler ultrasonography. Ital J Anat Embryol. 1994;99(1):9–16.
14. Krejza J, Mariak Z, Walecki J, Szydlik P, Lewko J, Ustymowicz A.Transcranial color Doppler
sonography of basal cerebral arteries in 182 healthy subjects: age and sex variability and nor­mal reference values for blood ow parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172(1):213–8.
15. Tegeler CH, Crutcheld K, Katsnelson M, Kim J, Tang R, Passmore Grifn L, etal. Transcranial
Doppler velocities in a large, healthy population. J Neuroimaging. 2013;23(3):466–72.
16. Grolimund P, Seiler RW.Age dependence of the ow velocity in the basal cerebral arteries--a
transcranial Doppler ultrasound study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14(3):191–8.
17. Yang D, Cabral D, Gaspard EN, Lipton RB, Rundek T, Derby CA.Cerebral hemodynamics in
the elderly: a transcranial Doppler study in the Einstein aging study Cohort. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(9):1907–14.
18. Brouwers PJ, Vriens EM, Musbach M, Wieneke GH, van Huffelen AC.Transcranial pulsed
Doppler measurements of blood ow velocity in the middle cerebral artery: reference values at rest and during hyperventilation in healthy children and adolescents in relation to age and sex. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(1):1–8.
19. Ringelstein EB, Kahlscheuer B, Niggemeyer E, Otis SM. Transcranial Doppler sonography:
anatomical landmarks and normal velocity values. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(8):745–61.
20. Barbosa MF, Abdala N, Carrete H Jr, Nogueira RG, Nalli DR, Fonseca JR, etal. Reference
values for measures of blood ow velocities and impedance indexes in healthy individuals through conventional transcranial Doppler. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006;64(3B):829–38.
21. Demirkaya S, Uluc K, Bek S, Vural O.Normal blood ow velocities of basal cerebral arteries
decrease with advancing age: a transcranial Doppler sonography study. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2008;214(2):145–9.
22. Donnelly J, Budohoski KP, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M.Regulation of the cerebral circulation:
bedside assessment and clinical implications. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):129.
23. Farhoudi M, Kermani S, Sadeghi-Bazargani H.Relatively higher norms of blood ow velocity
of major intracranial arteries in North-West Iran. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:174.
24. Franco M, Ariza-Araújo Y, Mejía-Mantilla JH.Estimación de valores hemodinámicos medi-
ante el uso del doppler transcraneal en un grupo de voluntarios habitantes de Cali (Colombia), una ciudad a 995m sobre el nivel del mar. Imagen Diagnóstica. 2015;6(2):49–56.
25. Moller K, Paulson OB, Hornbein TF, Colier WN, Paulson AS, Roach RC, etal. Unchanged
cerebral blood ow and oxidative metabolism after acclimatization to high altitude. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:118–26.
26. Brass LM, Pavlakis SG, DeVivo D, Piomelli S, Mohr JP.Transcranial Doppler measurements
of the middle cerebral artery effect of hematocrit. Stroke. 1988;19:1466–9.
175
176
27. Scherle Matamoros CE, Rivero RD.Transcranial Doppler ultrasound measurements of cere-
bral hemodynamic parameters in healthy volunteers at 2850 meters altitude. Radiology. 2019;61(5):405–11.
28. Isikay CT, Uzuner N, Gücüyener D, Ozdemir G. The effects of hematocrit and age on
transcranial Doppler measurements in patients with recent ischemic stroke. Neurol India. 2005;53:51–4.
J. H. Mejía Mantilla et al.
Chapter 10
Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS) Approaches: Acoustic Windows
JorgeCarrizosa
Key Points
1. Proper insonation technique is essential to achieve better visualization of struc-
tures and trustable ow velocities in transcranial Doppler evaluation.
2. A standardized routine of insonation should be applied to decrease intra- and
interobserver variability.
3. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography is an easy, reproducible, and non-
invasive method to evaluate critical care patients at the bedside.
4. To know the acoustic windows and their related target structures will allow a
complete evaluation of the brain hemodynamics in most cases.
5. The sonographer/physician must know considerations about age, gender, ethnic-
ity, and other conditions related to hard-to-insonate windows.

10.1 Introduction

Neurological evaluation is not easy in neurocritical care patients to understand brain dynamics and to anticipate complications as deep sedation is common. Multimodal neuromonitoring has emerged as a strategy to evaluate the central nervous system in critical care patients. Hemodynamic instability, risk of complications during trans­fer to the imaging department, and need for frequent evaluation of brain hemody­namics represent usual conditions of the neurocritical ill patient. Non-invasive monitoring strategies are essential and necessary to avoid complications during transfer to other wards and to enable frequent evaluation. Transcranial Doppler
J. Carrizosa (*) Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fé, Bogotá, Colombia
Neurointensive Care section - AMCI, Bogotá, Colombia e-mail: magnusdronjak@hotmail.com
C. N. Rodríguez et al. (eds.), Neurosonology in Critical Care,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81419-9_10
177© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
178
J. Ca rr izosa
sonography was described rst by Aaslid in 1982 as a technique for examination of intracranial cerebral arteries [1].
In the last years, with the advent of focused ultrasound protocols [2], routine evaluation of the critical care patient is becoming a mandatory skill, including assessment of the central nervous system. Nowadays, there are two methods to assess brain with ultrasound: transcranial Doppler limited to evaluation of brain ow velocities and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography, which permits assessment of central nervous system in brightness mode (B-mode). To master skills performing an ultrasound to obtain the best images possible is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis.
The purpose of this chapter is to guide the technique of the insonation of the brain through different acoustic windows, structured assessment, the target of evalu­ation, and evaluation routine on both sides—additionally, a description of some recommendations to optimize structure visualization and optimize image views.

10.2 TCD/TCCS: Acoustic Windows

Inner skull structures are not easy to evaluate randomly with ultrasound as the bone is a strong reector. To know anatomy to identify thinner areas of the skull is man­datory in routine evaluation during ultrasound evaluation. In order to achieve visu­alization of relevant anatomical structures, a 2.0–3.5MHz phased array transducer is necessary (Fig. 10.1).
Additionally, transcranial Doppler ultrasound preset in ultrasound machines with similar software facilitates quick identication of different structures (Fig. 10.1b).
Fig. 10.1 Ultrasound probes indicated for transcranial Doppler ultrasound in comparison. TCD transcranial Doppler; TCCD transcranial color-coded sonography
10 Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS) Approaches: Acoustic Windows
a
b
179
Fig. 10.2 (a) Sonographer/physician position behind the patient, ensuring comfort to perform complete transcranial Doppler evaluation. (Author: Jorge Carrizosa). (b) Physician showing dex­terity in transcranial Doppler examination with both hands. (Author: Jorge Carrizosa)
Comfort is fundamental for the sonographer/physician, who should be located behind the patient when it is possible (Fig.10.2a). However, head access in that way could be difcult in critical care patients due to other monitoring devices, wires, and extracorporeal support machines. Some modications to the usual position should be done in many cases. Acquiring skills to insonate the brain with both hands is essential to achieve adequate insonation (Fig.10.2b).
180
J. Ca rr izosa
10.2.1 Transtemporal Acoustic Window (Table10.1)
10.2.1.1 Technique
Place the 2.0–3.5MHz phased array transducer in B-mode image at the temporal bone cephalad to the zygomatic arch and anterior to the ear with probe indicator alienated with the plane of the eye of the patient -axial- (Fig.10.3). In this position, the very rst target of visualization is the midbrain, visualized as a hypoechoic buttery-shaped surrounded by the hyperechoic cisterns (Fig.10.4a, b). The initial depth of insonation of 15 centimeters is recommended, recognizing the contralat­eral side of the skull as a hyperechoic image [3]. Then, slight tilt movements in cephalocaudal direction scanning downward and upward identify different planes with particular anatomical structures, as shown in Fig.10.5.
After scanning of transtemporal planes in B-mode image, color-coded Doppler is activated with midbrain visualization in the center of the image in order to iden­tify the circle of Willis. The probability of recognizing the circle of Willis as mid­brain is displayed is high, even in non-expert practitioners [4].
Table 10.1 Target of visualization: transtemporal window
Targets of visualization
B-mode: midbrain, third ventricle, thalami, basal ganglia, frontal horns, pineal gland, and insula Color Doppler and pulsed wave Doppler modes: circle of Willis (middle cerebral artery[MCA],
anterior cerebral artery[ACA], posterior cerebral artery[PCA], top of the basilar cerebral artery), terminal segment of the internal carotid artery[ICA])
Fig. 10.3 Transtemporal window showing position of the transducer: 1-vertical axis anterior to the ear; 2-horizontal axis cephalad to the zygomatic arch; 3-probe indicator (green dot), alienated with the plane of the eye of the patient. Yellow window indicates the area for exploration of the anterior temporal window. (Author: Jorge Carrizosa)
10 Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS) Approaches: Acoustic Windows
181
a
Fig. 10.4 Transtemporal window examination. (a) B-mode image highlighting in the zoomed yel­low square the hypoechoic area of the midbrain. (b) Color-coded image of the same plane of insonation showing midbrain and surrounding vascular structures of the circle of Willis. (Author: Jorge Carrizosa)
a
b
b
Fig. 10.5 (a) Complete circle of Willis is shown with gain increased for educational clarity. (b) Same picture in image A with demarcation of the different arteries in the circle of Willis with dif­ferent colors. Black boxes are indicating every artery name. Triangle: superior cerebellar artery; pentagon: top of the basilar artery. (Author: Jorge Carrizosa)
The direction of blood ow should be useful to a better understanding of brain vascular anatomy in the color-coded Doppler display as vessels with ow toward the transducer are coded red while those with ow away from the transducer are coded blue. In this insonation plane, the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) (red) is M1–M2 segments, M3 (blue) segment; the ipsilateral anterior cerebral artery (blue) is A1–A2 segments; and the ipsilateral posterior cerebral artery (red) is P1 and P2 (blue) segments as displayed.
In the complete circle of Willis patients, anterior communicating artery and pos­terior communicating artery could be identied. Contralateral A1 and M1 segments are also common in patients with an adequate transtemporal window (Fig.10.5a, b). Once identied the circle of Willis in color-coded Doppler display, the practitioner can proceed to pulsed-wave Doppler mode to appraise cerebral arterial and venous spectral waves and measure velocities of blood ow at every point of interest.
182
J. Ca rr izosa
Color-coded Doppler scanning in the same planes as B-mode image explained before is also recommended. By slightly tilting the transducer in a caudal direction, the terminal segment of the internal carotid artery can be noticed. Coronal plane insonation could also be done by rotating the transducer by 90° at the P1 segment (posterior coronal plane), allowing the visualization of the top of the basilar artery [4].
10.2.2 Transforaminal Acoustic Window (Table10.2)
10.2.2.1 Technique
Place the 2.0–3.5MHz phased array transducer in B-mode image suboccipital at the midline and pointed toward the nasion (Fig.10.6), identifying the bone border of the foramen magnum and the clivus. Activate the color Doppler mode box and identify both intracranial segments of vertebral arteries lateral to the foramen magnum. Sigmoid sinus is usually visualized at this point. Then, tilt the transducer upward following the vertebral arteries to nd their junction with the basilar artery at 75–80 millimeters approximately (Fig.10.7). The path of the basilar artery can be tracked
Table 10.2 Target of visualization: transforaminal Window
Targets of visualization
B-mode: foramen magnum Color Doppler and pulsed wave Doppler modes: vertebral arteries, basilar artery, posterior
inferior cerebral arteries, sigmoid sinus
a
Fig. 10.6 (a) Insonation of transforaminal window showing correct angle of insonation with ultra­sound beam toward the nasion (green dot). (b) Transforaminal window insonation in a critical care patient. Note how a folded pillow helps to place the transducer in proper position. (Author: Jorge Carrizosa)
b