Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5783_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
40 Мб
Скачать
306
[]
–/
L. L. P. Mejia et al.
The interaction between the prole of the waveform and the total parallel resis­tance of stenotic and/or collateral vessel is rather intricate [34, 45]. The waveform changes when the pulsatile wave travels through an arterial narrowing with signi­cant ow resistance. This reduces the sensitivity of the pulsatility index (PI) (Eq.17.5). Its sensitivity is again augmented when PI is normalized by dividing the observed PI by a reference PI (PI culated as PI/PI
.
ref
). The pulsatility transmission index can be cal-
ref
PI PSV EDVMFV=
(17.5)

17.4 TCD: Waveform Interpretation

The feasibility of using TCD technology to measure CBFV in the basal arteries of the brain’s anterior circulation was rst demonstrated in the early 1980s in 50 healthy subjects [41, 47]. It was then proposed that TCD could be used to monitor vasospasm in aSAH and cerebrovascular disease, when using a Doppler operating at a lower range (1–2 MHz). Instruments operating at higher ranges (typically 5–10MHz) were used to evaluate extracranial vessels, and they do not penetrate the skull. Before this, ultrasound technology had been used to examine CBF, but only intraoperatively during craniotomies.
TCD technology has been used in the clinical evaluation of cerebral autoregula­tory reserve, and different indices have been proposed to study cerebral hemody­namics. The indices include those that are “static,” which require articially increasing or decreasing blood pressure using intravenous vasopressors or vasodila­tors in steady-state conditions (static cerebral autoregulation), and those that are “dynamic,” which measure the cerebrovascular hemodynamic response to interven­tions such as changes in arterial CO transient carotid occlusion (e.g., autoregulatory index, transient hyperemic response ratio). The third category has been created to describe more advanced methods, wherein CBFV calculated from TCD is used to derive a third variable (e.g., nonin­vasive ICP, critical closing pressure).
Current practices in the neurocritical care unit do not routinely include maneu­vers to challenge the injured brain to measure its autoregulatory response, mainly because that type of testing may require the patient to be cooperative (e.g., squat­ting) or because the safety remains debatable (e.g., carotid compression). It has been proposed that cerebral autoregulation be estimated by measuring it from spontaneous variations of MAP [48]. Transform function analysis is a mathemati­cal representation in frequency domain of a system between input and output data and has emerged as a technology suiting this purpose. The effect of oscillations in
/pH, rapid pneumatic thigh cuff deation, or
2
17 Neuro-ICU: Cerebral Hemodynamics and Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS…
307
MAP over CBFV can be studied by recording a series of times as input and output of the system. This has been done in a range of frequencies, and it is attained by employing a Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) [49]. Typically, oscillation fre­quencies are separated into three bands: low (<0.07 Hz), intermediate (0.07–0.3Hz), and high (>0.3Hz), although the limits vary among authors [47]. The behavior of the system interprets cerebral autoregulation as a high-pass lter based on three parameters: coherence, gain, and phase shift [48]. At high frequen­cies, (1) the oscillations of CBFV follow those of ABP, so coherence (which is simply a correlation coefcient within dened frequency range) is high; (2) these parameters oscillate almost synchronously, so the phase lag between them is near zero degrees (low phase shift); and (3) the ABP oscillations are transmitted undampened to the output (CBFV), so gain (amplitude) is usually >1. The oppo­site occurs toward the low-frequency band, with low coherence and gain and higher phase shift values. That is the way cerebral autoregulation is believed to exert its effect in the lower band of frequencies. This type of response is expected from a physiologic point of view, as vascular tone takes a few seconds to adjust to changes in ABP.To apply transform function analysis, researchers have proposed using CBFV and ABP time series monitoring for at least 10minutes. Module of coherence varies between 0 and 1, from good to impaired cerebral autoregulation. Phase shift varies between 0 and 90 degrees, from nonexistent to effective cere­bral autoregulation. Lower gain means adequate cerebral autoregulation and higher gain means poor cerebral autoregulation.
Currently available software uses proprietary algorithms to obtain different indi­ces. Such numbers can be altered from physiologic changes (e.g., vessel caliber) but also by FFT size (number of points used), FFT length (time), FFT transformation overlap (%), transmitted ultrasound frequency (MHz), high-pass lter settings (Hz), and recording time (minutes). Standard settings have not been universally agreed upon. Nonetheless, cerebral autoregulation studies with TCD always rely on the assumption that MCA diameter does not change during the monitoring time. Another consideration to keep in mind is that CBF is measured in units of ml/ min/100 g, whereas TCD technology provides CBF velocity (CBFV) in units of cm/s. There is a positive correlation between the absolute increase in CBF obtained by regional CBF with single-photon emission computed tomography and the increase in CBF velocity by TCD after acetazolamide administration (modest cor­relation r=0.63, p<0.01) [50, 51]. These results suggest that TCD combined with acetazolamide test may be used in clinical situations to assess cerebral vasoreactivity.
The major advantages of TCD are that it is noninvasive, has remarkable temporal resolution (~5ms), and is highly reproducible (~5% variability). Some have called TCD “a stethoscope for the brain.” Disadvantages include the lack of temporal win­dow in up to 10% of patients and the fact that continuous monitoring of TCD is very sensitive to movement.
308
L. L. P. Mejia et al.
17.4.1 TCD Waveforms
The spectral waveform of blood ow velocity can be used to evaluate resistance to the ow. High-resistance vascular beds are characterized by a waveform with a sharp upstroke accompanied by a relatively abrupt waning in velocity immediately after peak systole with low end-diastolic velocity. Low-resistance waveforms are characterized by a steadier upstroke, a more gradual decline, and a higher end­diastolic velocity. The cerebral vascular bed is a low-resistance bed. Changes in the resistance, as detected by spectral waveform analysis, can be secondary to local stenosis or to the effects of proximal or distal disease within the insonated vascular bed [52].
The TCD waveform of ow is represented by blood ow velocity over time dur­ing the cardiac cycle. The sonographer must recognize a waveform pattern visually by its appearance on the screen as well as by the sound of the ow signal. Sonographers must annotate the machine settings, including (1) transducer and sample volume (gate) positioning, (2) ow direction, (3) angle of insonation, (4) scale settings, and (5) sweep speed. Then, the different components of the cardiac cycle are identied, namely, (1) beginning of systole, (2) peak velocity during sys­tole, (3) dicrotic notch (signifying the closure of the aortic valve), (4) end-diastolic velocity, and (5) shape and magnitude of ow deceleration during the cardiac cycle.
The crucial aspects to waveform presentation are the identication of the follow­ing components: (1) early systolic upstroke (slow, sharp, or delayed); (2) late sys­tolic and diastolic deceleration (uninterrupted, stepwise, or smoothed); (3) waveform shape (at, sharpened, or dampened); (4) systolic—diastolic velocity difference (ow pulsatility); and (5) other components of the Doppler spectra (embolism, bruit, narrowing, etc.). Normal waveforms exhibit sharp systolic ow acceleration and stepwise deceleration with positive end-diastolic ow. Additionally, end­diastolic ow velocity falls between 20% and 50% of the peak systolic velocity values (low resistance). Finally, at the level of the ICA bifurcation, a bidirectional signal with simultaneous sharp systolic upstrokes and similar stepwise deceleration in both ow directions denotes low-resistance ow patterns.
The ow velocity in a blood vessel is roughly parabolic in shape, with the fastest velocity in the center of the vessel. Consequently, the Doppler spectrum represents a distribution of velocities that requires mathematical calculations to derive useful velocity values. Normally, a power spectrum distribution is produced from seg­ments of about 2–5seconds using an FFT, and maximum or mean velocity is calcu­lated from the maximum or intensity-weighted mean, respectively [53] (Fig.17.1).
Modern TCD ultrasonographic instruments that are currently available use computer- based statistical pattern recognition systems developed for the analysis of the spectral waveforms. The various indices obtained from such wave analysis are as follows:
Systolic Acceleration RateSAR
()
Height
=
Rise time
()
Mean time
()
17 Neuro-ICU: Cerebral Hemodynamics and Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS…
Area under spectral waveform
Height
Systolic
Mean time
Decay timeRise time
Fig. 17.1 An example of the feature extraction from the spectral waveform of the middle cere­bral artery
309
Diastolic
Pulsatility Index of Gosling and KingPI
llocity EndDiastolic velocity
Peak systolic ve
Resistivity Index of PourcellotRI
Peak systolic velocity
Systolic Diastolic Ratio SDR
/
Rise Decay Time Ratio RDTR
/
Rise Mean Time Ratio RMTR
/
Blood Volume Rate
The Lindergaard Ratio LR
Peak systolic velocity
−−
−−−EndDiastolic velocity
Peak systolic velocity
=
()
()
()
Area under spectral waveform
=
()
EndDi
=
=
Mean time
MCAvelocity
=
ICAvelocity
=
=
aastolic velocity
Rise time
Decay time
Rise time
mean time
310
L. L. P. Mejia et al.
If the gain settings are correct, the envelope outlines the waveform shape after the peak systolic rise, the ow deceleration, and the proportion of the end-diastolic ow component. These computer-based pattern recognition approaches have been developed to analyze TCD signals by detecting the boundary edge (envelope or fol­lower) of spectral waveform using the Sobel edge detection algorithm [54].
Gosling’s pulsatility index (PI) and the Pourcelot resistivity index (RI) give an estimation of cerebral perfusion pressure, pulsatility of arterial blood pressure, downstream resistance in cerebral circulation, and compliance of cerebral vessels. The PI reference range is between 0.5 and 1.19 [55]. In the presence of proximal stenosis or occlusion, the PI may be <0.5 due to arteriolar vasodilation distally; conversely, a distal occlusion or constriction increases the PI to >1.19 secondary to increased resistance distally [56]. A PI >1.17 correlates with the presence of silent brain damage on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (e.g., microvascular disease) in patients with chronic systemic hypertension [57]. Conversely, despite an elevated PI in young people free of chronic systemic hypertension (PI=1.2), a high pulsatil­ity waveform in the MCA indicates normal patency of its proximal segment.
PI is regarded by many as an often misleading or imprecise reection of the true resistance, as it has limitations. Critical closing pressure is the internal pressure at which the blood vessel collapses and closes completely. Cerebral perfusion pressure (CCP) is the principal determinant of PI.Consequently, some experts argue that PI has no distinctive physiologic meaning by itself [58]. Michel and Zernikow [58] concluded that the use of PI as a measure of resistance in autoregulated circuits should be abandoned because the autoregulation models that use PI do not uni­formly match experimentally induced changes in vascular resistance.
A Pourcelot RI > 0.8 suggests increased distal resistance [59] or abnormally decreased cerebral perfusion pressure. Elevated RI in different intracranial patholo­gies that result in increased ICP is comparable to that of an abnormal PI.Nonetheless, the RI is less sensitive to ICP variations than is PI [60].
The Lindegaard ratio (LR) tends to increase in relation to the degree of vaso­spasm. Normal reference range is from 1.1 to 2.3 and in the absence of vasospasm is <3 [61].
In patients with irregular heart rhythm (extrasystole, atrial brillation, etc.), the end-diastolic velocities may fall below 30% of peak systole. This decrease also affects estimation of ow resistance (increased values of PI calculated with enve­lope tracings) from the averaged values of 2–5cycles. A single cycle may be selected for manual measurements. Prolonged pauses between cardiac cycles may lead to lower end-diastolic velocities that excessively underestimate the velocity and over­estimate the PI.In those cases, a manual measurement of the highest velocity cycle is recommended instead, a practical but inaccurate solution.
Various efforts to examine the use of TCD ultrasound for the assessment of intra­cranial arterial ow velocity have been published [29, 30, 34, 6264]. The common techniques used are simply to measure the values of the peak systolic, peak dia­stolic, and mean ow velocity from FFT Doppler spectra at selected depths. Nonetheless, the standard deviation of normal values is wide. Physiologic variabil­ity in parameters such as blood pressure, cardiac output, peripheral resistance, and
17 Neuro-ICU: Cerebral Hemodynamics and Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS…
arterial compliance lead to high intra-individual variation in peak systolic ow in the MCA (91.0±16.9cm/s), peak diastolic ow (44.3±9.5cm/s), and average mean velocity (57.7±11.5cm/s) [63] and can result in diagnostic errors. It is dif­cult with this approach to objectively classify in quantitative terms those spectral features that are associated with varying degrees of stenosis in the intracranial arter­ies. The use of a more quantitative and objective approach to analyzing Doppler spectral waveforms and classifying the varying degree of stenosis in the intracranial arteries is thus highly desirable.
311
17.5 Transcranial Flow Velocity Monitoring
inNeurocritical Care
In this section, we are limiting our discussion to those conditions in which TCD has been applied: (1) daily monitoring of CBFV during aSAH-induced vasospasm, (2) imminent brain death, and (3) MCA blood ow during increased ICP.In the follow­ing chapters, each of these applications will be described in detail. In this section, we focus on the physiology of the waveform interpretation.
17.5.1 Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Delayed cerebral ischemia after aSAH is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Frequently, the presenting sign is a neurologic decit, which may be detected too late to reverse. TCD ultrasonography is used to guide clinical decision-making in regard to additional diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic interventions. When per­formed in isolation, the contribution of TCD to improving patient outcome has not been established. Nevertheless, TCD has become a regularly used tool in neurocriti­cal care and perioperative settings. A specic condition called hyperemia will pro­duce a unique pattern of high-velocity–low-resistance waveforms in one or several arteries, whereas the remainder of the vessels will have normal velocities and PIs. This phenomenon can be seen in hyperdynamic states after aSAH and must not be confused with vasospasm [61]. When the CBFV is elevated but the LR is lower than 3, the elevation is considered to be caused by hyperemia. An LR>6 indicates severe vasospasm [61, 6567], and LR>3 denotes mild to moderate vasospasm. A modi­ed LR (mLR; basilar artery mean CBFV divided by left or right extracranial verte­bral artery mean CBFV) has also been proposed for evaluation of posterior circulation vasospasm. mLR=2–2.49 indicates possible vasospasm; mLR=2.5–2.99 suggests moderate vasospasm; and mLR >3 signies severe vasospasm. A CBFV variation of more than 14% with TCD side-to-side is considered abnormal; most individuals (95%) will not have day-to-day variation of mean CBFV of more than 10cm/s [68, 69].
In patients with severe vasospasm, the use of a large sample volume (gate) may produce a simultaneous display of waveforms detected at different arterial segments
312
L. L. P. Mejia et al.
a
b
Fig. 17.2 Vasospasm. Panel A. Transcranial Doppler waveform from the left middle cerebral artery in a patient on day 3 after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage shows a mean velocity of 90cm/s. Panel B. Transcranial Doppler waveform from the left middle cerebral artery in the same patient from Panel A on day 11 shows a mean velocity of 240cm/s (diastolic notch is still present)
(i.e., terminal ICA, proximal M1, or adjacent segments with different patency). The highest velocities in waveform are often considered to be the site of maximum vaso­spasm (Fig.17.2). However, a mirror artifact and/or hyperemia must be excluded by using the LR.The signal-to-noise ratio appears to be optimized (i.e., no noise in the background).
17.5.2 Increased ICP
A ow signal above baseline that shows sharp systolic upstrokes followed by sharp deceleration represents an increased ow resistance. Elevated PI and RI have been observed in patients with increased ICP (Fig.17.3). The Doppler signal shows a sharpened waveform secondary to a fast ow deceleration. Also, a waveform above baseline that exhibits a signicant diastolic ow likely suggests that some ow is
17 Neuro-ICU: Cerebral Hemodynamics and Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS…
313
a
Fig. 17.3 Increased intracranial pressure. Panel A. Transcranial Doppler waveform from a low­resistance vessel exhibiting continuous forward ow throughout both systole and diastole. Panel B. Transcranial Doppler waveform from a vessel with high resistance caused by elevated intracra­nial pressure shows a sharp systolic upstroke, a narrow peak in systole, and less ow in diastole
b
directed to a vascular bed with a lower resistance. This can happen in patients with TBI because different brain areas may sustain various degrees of disturbed auto­regulation or unequal distribution of ICP and mass effect.
No irrefutable, close relationship between ICP and mean MCA ow velocity or the shape of the ow waveform has been demonstrated. Nevertheless, some general state­ments can be made regarding the MCA ow signal alterations after ICP elevation. For instance, in TBI, ow velocity increases immediately after the injury onset and lasts for several days or even weeks. However, ICP is not markedly elevated during this period. When ICP increases sharply, a hyperperfusion prole (i.e., high velocities, decrease of pulsatility) appears initially but rapidly evolves to an increasingly pulsatile, high-resis­tance ow prole, and nally to a reversed ow of the blood volume. PI is intrinsically related to ICP.A PI variation of 2.4% is reected by a 1mmHg change in ICP in the same direction [70]. Indeed, several studies have proposed a strong correlation between PI and ICP, independent of the type of intracranial pathology [59, 60, 71].
Unfortunately, correlation-based approaches are not able to measure absolute ICP accurately enough for TCD ultrasonography to be used in clinical treatment planning. Yet, one study found that the noninvasive ICP measurement technique based on two-depth TCD ultrasound had a better diagnostic reliability in neurologi­cal patients than the optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasonography when expressed by the sensitivity and specicity for detecting elevated ICP >14.7mmHg. Another study showed that changes of ICP in time domain during plateau waves are repli­cated by noninvasive ICP methods with strong correlations. In addition, the meth­ods offered high performance for detecting intracranial hypertension [72].
17.5.3 Impending Brain Death: Progression toBrain Death
An oscillating or reverberating ow spectrum represents two waveforms (above and below the baseline) with an extremely high resistance to ow. Flow signals above baseline appear as sharp spikes, and a rushed ow deceleration to zero corresponds
314
b
a
L. L. P. Mejia et al.
with the time of the aortic valve closure and absence of positive end-diastolic ow. The same blood volume bounces back its direction during the entire diastole, gen­erating the sign of ow reverberation or oscillation. An exceptionally high resis­tance to ow impedes brain perfusion. This waveform typically is observed in patients who have developed substantial cerebral edema with progression to cere­bral circulatory arrest. When reverberating ow is found in all intracranial basal arteries, it accurately predicts the absence of brain perfusion in nuclear CBF studies. Hemodynamically, this waveform indicates that all blood that registered through the sample volume toward the brain in systole was pushed out of the distal vasculature in diastole as a result of no ow traveling to brain parenchyma (Fig.17.4).
Fig. 17.4 Impending brain death. Panel A. Transcranial Doppler waveform of oscillating ow. A sharp forward ow is present in systole with reversal of ow in diastole. Panel B. Transcranial Doppler waveform of a systolic spike. There is brief forward ow during systole and no ow dur­ing diastole. Both waveforms are consistent with brain death
17 Neuro-ICU: Cerebral Hemodynamics and Transcranial Doppler (TCD/TCCS…
315

17.6 Conclusion

TCD is an imperfect technique. As such, several technical and interpretative aspects must be considered to obtain a dependable TCD exam. Nevertheless, TCD ultra­sound is capable of following dynamic cerebrovascular processes noninvasively. Daily or continuous monitoring of ow velocities and proles can help clinicians to recognize trends or pattern changes that alert them to deterioration and the need for a therapeutic response in the care of neurocritically ill patients.

References

1. Alpers BJ, Berry RG, Paddison RM.Anatomical studies of the circle of Willis in normal brain.
AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1959;81(4):409–18.
2. Lehrer HZ.Relative calibre of the cervical internal carotid artery. Normal variation with the
circle of Willis. Brain. 1968;91(2):339–48.
3. Sorteberg W, Lindegaard KF, Rootwelt K, Dahl A, Russell D, Nyberg-Hansen R, et al.
Blood velocity and regional blood ow in dened cerebral artery systems. Acta Neurochir. 1989;97(1–2):47–52.
4. Knowlton FP, Starling EH.The inuence of variations in temperature and blood-pressure on
the performance of the isolated mammalian heart. J Physiol. 1912;44(3):206–19.
5. Grifths DJ. Steady uid ow through veins and collapsible tubes. Med Biol Eng.
1971;9(6):597–602.
6. Skalak R, Keller SR, Secomb TW. Mechanics of blood ow. J Biomech Eng.
1981;103(2):102–15.
7. Brower RW, Noordergraaf A.Pressure-ow characteristics of collapsible tubes: a reconcilia-
tion of seemingly contradictory results. Ann Biomed Eng. 1973;1(3):333–55.
8. Stromberg DD, Fox JR.Pressures in the pial arterial microcirculation of the cat during changes
in systemic arterial blood pressure. Circ Res. 1972;31(2):229–39.
9. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Laing RJ, Menon D, Pickard JD.Continuous assess-
ment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery. 1997;41(1):11–7. dis­cussion 7–9
10. Rivera-Lara L, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Geocadin RG, Healy RJ, Ziai W, Mirski MA. Cerebral
autoregulation-oriented therapy at the bedside: a comprehensive review. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(6):1187–99.
11. Lassen NA. Cerebral blood ow and oxygen consumption in man. Physiol Rev.
1959;39(2):183–238.
12. Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Varsos GV, Kasprowicz M, Brady KM, et al.
Cerebral autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of three methods. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(3):449–56.
13. Fog M.Autoregulation of cerebral blood ow and its abolition by local hypoxia and-or trauma.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1968;102:V:B.
14. Strandgaard S, Paulson OB.Cerebral autoregulation. Stroke. 1984;15(3):413–6.
15. Halpern W, Osol G.Inuence of transmural pressure of myogenic responses of isolated cere-
bral arteries of the rat. Ann Biomed Eng. 1985;13(3–4):287–93.
16. Symon L, Held K, Dorsch NW.A study of regional autoregulation in the cerebral circulation
to increased perfusion pressure in normocapnia and hypercapnia. Stroke. 1973;4(2):139–47.
17. Winn HR, Rubio R, Berne RM.Brain adenosine production in the rat during 60 seconds of
ischemia. Circ Res. 1979;45(4):486–92.