Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5319_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
92 Мб
Скачать
ab
c
. • Receptors as Target Structures for Drugs


. Fig. 22.6 a The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is ali-
gand-gated ion channel (Sect.30.4). Here the cylinders do not stand for segments but rather for ve separate proteins, each of which has four transmembrane domains. After binding acetylcholine, the chan­nel is quickly opened. For example, chloride channels use the same principle of construction (Sect.30.7). bSoluble receptors dimerize af­ter agonist docking to their ligand-binding domains (LBD). Here ho­modimers composed of two identical receptors as well as heterodimers
are known, but new ones are still being discovered and characterized (Sect.29.1).
After an agonist docks, the active conformation of the receptor is stabilized. Antagonists prevent agonists from docking, and inverse agonists stabilize the inactive conformation of the receptor.
The initiated receptor response proceeds along iden­tical pathways, despite the different receptor types, and then branches off again. This economical principle of Nature is also used in other cases, such as the regulation of cell proliferation. The more or less pronounced effect specicity is achieved by
The different structures of the agonists and receptors
-
and the resulting activation of different G-proteins
and effector proteins,
The different receptor occupancy and density of dif-
-
ferent cells, and
The location of the cells that produce and release the
-
hormone or neurotransmitter. This is accomplished
in very specic cells; neighboring cells or organs are
not involved.
of two different receptors can be formed. The so-called zinc ngers of the DNA-binding domains (DBD) recognize very specic sequences of DNA. Aparticular DNA segment is addressed by dimerizing two receptor units. cMembrane-bound receptors for growth factors and insulin also dimerize. Two receptors form acomplex in the membrane and in doing so activate the intracellular domain of the receptor, in this case, atyrosine kinase
The picture of such receptors can be very complex. For example, there are two distinct groups of acetylcholine re- ceptors that preferentially bind either muscarine, atoxin from the toadstool Amanita muscaria, or nicotine, the active ingredient in the tobacco plant Nicotiana tabacum. Unlike the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, the nico­tinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is aligand-gated ion channel (Sect.30.5). It has acomplex architecture of ve protein chains located in the cell membrane (. Fig.22.6a). For the nAChR from the electric organ of the torpedo electric ray, ash, cryo-electron microscopy images are available of the closed and open structure (af­ter activation by acetylcholine) of the 290 kD nAChR protein complex (Sect.30.5).
Many hormone receptors, such as those for thyroid hormone, sex hormones, the corticosteroids, and retinoic acid, are soluble receptors that can move freely in the cy­tosol, or cell uid. After binding the agonist, the complex translocates to the nucleus. There it binds as adimer to the signal sequences of the DNA, operator and repres­sor genes and induces or suppresses the new synthesis
Chapter  • How Drugs Act: Concepts for Therapy
22
of specic proteins (. Fig.22.6b). These receptors are, therefore, also referred to as transcription factors.
All cytosolic hormone receptors or nuclear receptors are based on common structural principles (Sect.28.2). They have domains with aDNA-binding site and a li­gand-binding site. The DNA-binding site is highly con­served, i.e., its amino acid sequence varies very little between different receptors. It contains two “zinc n­gers” consisting of two Zn2+ binding sites, which are highly conserved motifs that bind to very specic DNA segments known as recognition sequences. The ligand binding site is much more variable. Dimers, either of two identical receptors (homodimers) or of two differ­ent receptors (heterodimers), are formed to interact with DNA. Four zinc ngers in the dimer recognize atotal of 12base pairs of DNA.
Dimerization is also found in other classes of mem­brane-bound receptors that are not GPCRs. These in­clude receptors for growth factors such as human growth hormone (hGH), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and insulin (Sect.29.8). Upon binding to the factor, these receptors dimerize with the extracellular domains in the membrane. This activates intracellular kinases that are part of the receptor protein (. Fig.22.6c). In addition, there are receptors that must form complexes of more than two units to elicit areceptor response. These in­clude anumber of immunologically important receptors, as well as receptors for nerve growth factor (NGF) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF, Sect.29.8).
Several examples of proteins that function as oligo­mers are presented in this section. In fact, oligomerization is also common in enzymes. There are many reasons why oligomerization is advantageous. On the one hand, there are functional requirements that require multiple adja­cent domains, as described above. On the other hand, there may be mechanistic advantages, especially for en­zymes. Individual domains of an oligomer are not neces­sarily independent. Their catalytic efciency may depend on the current state of the other domains of the oligo­mer. This provides an additional means of regulating protein function. Oligomerization can also have another signicance. The interior of acell is highly crowded with proteins, ligands, substrates, and ions. It can be com­pared to aticker-tape parade given to awinning football team: hectic pushing and shoving! One way to reduce this number without compromising catalytic productivity by sacricing catalytic centers is to form oligomers.
22.6 Drugs Regulate Ion Channels:
Our Extremely Fast Switches
Ion channels embedded in the cell membrane allow ions to enter or leave the cell along an electrochemical gradi­ent when open. The opening or closing of the channel
can be either voltage-, ligand-, or receptor-gated. All of these processes are extremely fast (Sect.30.1).
Many drugs act on voltage-gated ion channels (Sect.30.4). Local anesthetics and their derivatives are sodium channel blockers; they reduce the excitability of nerve cells. The fugu sh toxin, tetrodotoxin (Sect.30.4), also blocks this channel. Other antiarrhythmic drugs block potassium channels. Substances that stabilize the K+ channel in the open form, called K+ channel openers, have vasodilatory and antihypertensive effects. The anti­diabetic sulfonylureas are K+ channel blockers that act on the insulin-producing cells of the pancreas (Sect.30.2). Voltage-gated calcium channels are modulated by ligands such as the nifedipine-type antagonist or blockers such as the verapamil or diltiazem-type ligands (Sect.30.4).
The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR,
. Fig.22.6a), glutamate receptors, and GABA recep-
tors belong to the Cys–loop family of ligand-gated ion channels (Sects.30.5, 30.6, and30.7). The opening and
closing of the channel is not caused by an electrical im­pulse, but by the binding of aligand.
Benzodiazepine-type tranquilizers (Sect.30.7) enhance the binding of the neurotransmitter g-aminobutyric acid (GABA) to chloride channels. Prolonged opening of this channel results in an increased inux of chloride ions and achange in the response behavior of nerve cells. They bind between different domains of the channel. Barbiturates and inhaled anesthetics also act on GABA receptors, but at adifferent binding site between different domains.
22.7 Blocking Transporters
and Water Channels
Transporters are proteins that affect the active uptake of molecules or ions into cells. They play acrucial role in the digestive process. Because amino acids and sugars can­not cross membranes on their own, they can only be ab­sorbed in the digestive tract with the help of transporters.
Transporters are also extremely important for signal transmission in nerve cells. Once released, aneurotrans- mitter must be quickly removed from the synaptic cleft to prevent prolonged stimulation of the nerve cell. This is accomplished in part by metabolic degradation, but this is very wasteful for the releasing cell. Uptake (often incorrectly called reuptake) by aspecic transporter is more economical. The neurotransmitter is stored in ves­icles and made available for the next release.
Transporters work against concentration gradients. The transport process is relatively slow, much slower than an ion channel, and it requires energy. The amino acid sequence of the specic transporter is known for many neurotransmitters, amino acids, sugars, and nu­cleosides. Like G-protein-coupled receptors, transport-
. • Modes of Action: ANever-Ending Story


ers are divided into many families. Most have an even more complex structure with 12transmembrane domains (Sect.30.10).
Afew drugs target the transporters directly and dis­place the natural ligands. The euphoric effects of co­caine (Sect.3.4) are due to its binding to the dopamine transporter, which is responsible for the active transport and uptake of dopamine into neurons. Arapid onset of cocaine causes adelayed uptake of dopamine from the synaptic cleft, which is responsible for the typical physical and psychiatric effects. Some antidepressants are ligands for the noradrenaline and serotonin trans­porters (Sect.1.4). They are bound but not transported into the cell. In contrast, some amino acid analogues are transported into neurons by transporters and act as neurotoxins. The complex interplay of neurotransmit­ters, enzymes, receptors, and transporters is illustrated in
. Fig.22.7. Some anti-gout drugs bind to the uric acid
transporter. They displace uric acid, inhibit its absorp­tion from primary urine, and accelerate its excretion with urine. There are even specic transporters for bile acids.
In addition to the transporters described above, other members of this protein class are also important for the uptake or excretion of foreign substances into or from cells. Tumor cells often respond to therapeutic measures by developing multiple resistance to many structurally different substances (Sect.30.10). The glycoprotein GP 170, also atransporter with 12transmembrane domains, is responsible for this process.
In contrast to ion channels, ion transporters work against concentration gradients. This is an active process that requires energy (Sect.30.9). Drugs can also affect this process. One example is drugs that increase urine production: diuretics. They inhibit different ion trans­porters. The Na+/K+ ATPase, apump that exchanges sodium for potassium ions, is inhibited by cardiac gly­cosides, which are used to treat heart failure. Substances such as omeprazole (Sects.9.5 and30.9) inhibit the H+/
K+ ATPase, the so-called proton pump. Nature uses spe-
cial water channels to regulate water homeostasis and also to transport small, uncharged molecules such as glycerol or urea across the cell membrane quickly and selectively. Unlike transporters, and analogous to ion channels, these aquaporins allow water to ow along the osmotic gradient (Sect.30.12). Ten isoforms with dif­ferent permeabilities have been discovered in mammals. They are tetramers composed of six transmembrane he­lices. Each monomer unit forms achannel. The channels are partially made available for water homeostasis by the release from cytosolic vesicles or they can be activated by phosphorylation. Regulation of the water channels by drugs represents aconcept for diuretic therapy, but the treatment of parasitic infections has also been discussed as an additional indication.
22.8 Modes of Action: ANever-Ending
Story
Therapies for viral, bacterial and parasitic diseases at­tempt to target aspecic pathogen. Different mecha­nisms are used, such as biosynthetic pathways that are not present in humans in identical form or that do not play an important role in humans. In this way, the risk of adverse effects can be minimized from the outset.
Antimetabolites are substances that are incorporated as afalse substrate instead of the natural biological re­agents, for example as enzyme cofactors or in DNA. One example is the sulfonamide sulfonamidochrysoidine. Its cleavage product sulfanilamide (Sect.2.3) is similar to p-aminobenzoic acid, which is the starting material in the biosynthesis of an important bacterial cofactor, di­hydrofolic acid. Only bacteria are affected. Humans are not dependent on this biosynthetic pathway. Like other
. Fig. 22.7 Nerve signal transmission through neurotransmitters is
based on acomplex interplay of enzymes, receptors, ion channels, and transporters. Dopamine is produced by enzymatic decarboxylation of the amino acid l-DOPA. As with other neurotransmitters, it is stored in special vesicles. Upon electrical stimulation, Ca2+ ions ow into the cell. This causes the neurotransmitter to be released into the synaptic gap. The nerve impulse is conducted further by the interaction with the postsynaptic receptor. Finally, the uptake in the presynaptic cell is accomplished by atransporter and the neurotransmitter is stored in a vesicle again, or degraded by the enzyme monoamine oxidase (MAO). In the case of dopamine deciency, dopamine can be released by enzymatic decarboxylation when the drug l-dOPA, an amino acid that enters the nerve cell through the amino acid transporter, is ad­ministered
Chapter  • How Drugs Act: Concepts for Therapy
22
mammals, humans must obtain dihydrofolic acid from the diet. Some antiviral and anticancer drugs are nucleo- side analogues. Depending on the type of structure, they use amodied base, amodied sugar, or both. All affect DNA or RNA synthesis. Acyclovir and afew other an­alogues enter cells as Trojan horses in an inactive form and are “armed” once inside the cell. Their activation is carried out by viral enzymes, and this process occurs only inside cells that have been infected by the virus (Sects.9.5 and32.5). Another mechanistic principle attempts to in­terfere with the translation process so that certain pro­teins are never produced by protein biosynthesis. The
translation of mRNA is blocked by complexation with antisense oligonucleotides (Sect.32.4). The resulting dou-
ble-stranded mRNA cannot be read by the ribosome. This type of therapy can be used to treat exaggerated immune reactions, septic shock, arterial hypertension, pulmonary emphysema, or pancreatitis.
Many antibiotics, such as the penicillins and ceph­alosporins (Sect. 23.7), inhibit bacterial cell wall bio- synthesis. In the latter process, they block the catalytic center of atranspeptidase, which has asimilar mode of action to aserine hydrolase (Sect.23.7). The antibiotic
d-cycloserine, also an inhibitor of cell wall construction,
penetrates into the interior of the bacteria using ad-al­anine transporter. Other antibiotics are inhibitors of protein biosynthesis (Sects.32.6 and32.7). Tetracycline (Sect.6.4), streptomycin (Sect.6.4), and chlorampheni­col (Sect.9.2) also inhibit the protein synthesis machin­ery. They interact with the 30S or 50S subunit of the ribosome and block ribosomal peptide synthesis. The elucidation of the spatial structure of the ribosome has provided abasis for understanding the mechanism of action of alarge number of macrolide antibiotics and has provided aperspective on the development of resis­tance mechanisms (Sect.32.7). Antibacterial quinolone carboxylic acids inhibit gyrase. Gyrase is an enzyme that causes DNA to twist, thus, allowing DNA to be tightly packed in bacterial cells. Without this twisting, there is simply not enough space in the cell for the genetic ma­terial (Sect.32.6). Polyene antibiotics are used to treat fungal infections. They form channels in the fungal cell membrane that cause aloss of intracellular ions and, consequently, cell death. Azoles inhibit the biosynthesis of ergosterol, which is essential for the formation of an intact cell membrane.
Alkylating agents play an important role in tumor therapy. Alkylation of DNA bases results in reading and writing errors that are much more severe in rapidly di­viding tumor cells than in normal cells, but also have signicant side effects (Sect.12.14). Intercalating tumor therapeutics are planar molecules that slip between two base pairs of DNA (Sect.14.9). The resulting disrup­tion also leads to errors in cell division. Other DNA li­gands bind to the minor or major groove on the outside of the double helix. Paclitaxel (Taxol, Sect.6.1) and the
epothilones are important agents in cancer therapy. They bind to tubulin, aprotein that forms tube-like structures called microtubules. Since the formation of microtubules is essential for cell division, paclitaxel and the epothilones inhibit this process in avery specic way.
The immunosuppressant cyclosporine (Sect. 10.1,
. Fig.10.2) blocks the activation of the immune system,
the so-called helper cells. Two enzymes are involved in this process. One, cyclophilin, is aprolyl cis–trans isom- erase. The other, calcineurin, is aCa2+/calmodulin-de­pendent phosphatase. Cyclosporine acts as a“putty” (or molecular glue) between these two proteins. The complex prevents the activation of helper cells and, thus, stops the stimulation of an immune response. Modern trans­plantation surgery would not be possible without the im­munosuppressive cyclosporine and substances with an analogous mode of action.
RAS proteins play an important role in tumorigene­sis. They are afamily of relatively low molecular weight enzymes. RAS proteins with mutated active centers lose their ability to control cell division, and the cells divide unstoppably. They are therefore oncogenic, i.e., they cause tumors. About 50% of all lung and colon tumors have mutated ras genes, and about 95% of the ras genes in pancreatic tumors are mutated. There are other approaches to therapy. RAS proteins must move from the cytosol, the cell uid, to the cell membrane to signal cell division. To do this, they are enzymatically tagged with afarnesyl group that anchors the protein to the cell membrane. Preventing membrane anchoring by inhibiting farnesyl transferase is an attractive approach for targeted cancer therapy (Sect.26.11). It has now been shown that this principle of blocking protein farnesyla­tion can also be used to treat parasitic infections. The farnesyl transferases of these parasites are the targets for drug development.
Tumor suppressor genes produce proteins, such as the p53 protein, that prevent cell division in the event of DNA damage. Any genetic defect in acell that results in reduced levels of one or more of these proteins will allow cells with defective DNA to proliferate. Cell division be­comes uncontrolled, and atumor forms with additional genetic defects and uncontrolled growth.
Vascular occlusion is caused by the aggregation of platelets. Cell surface proteins called integrins, such as the adhesion glycoprotein α
, play an important role.
IIbβ3
Two of these molecules form acomplex with brinogen that “glues” cells together. The targeted development of small peptidomimetics (Sect.10.6) based on an RGD (Arg–Gly–Asp) motif has been amajor success in ratio­nal drug design (Sect.31.2). Another system that plays an important role in cell–cell recognition between leu­kocytes and endothelial cells are the selectins. In cases of inammation, E- and P-selectins are upregulated and presented on the endothelium, preventing leuko­cytes from rolling along the surfaces of the blood vessels
. • Resistance and Its Origin


(Sect.31.3). After adhesion, the leukocytes enter the ves­sel and migrate to the site of inammation to ght the in­fection. In some diseases, excessive leukocyte inltration leads to tissue damage. To prevent this, attempts have been made to interfere with the inammatory cascade with compounds that block the surface expression of se­lectins. These receptors recognize sugar-like molecular groups on the surface of leukocytes, so the development of appropriate carbohydrate-based antagonists represents asuitable therapeutic concept.
For infection to occur, asurface contact must be es­tablished between the inuenza virus and the host cell. The virus docks to the host cell with its capsule protein, hemagglutinin, to initiate endocytosis. Once inside the cell, the virus uses the protein biosynthetic machinery of the infected cell to make copies of itself. After matura­tion, the new virus must be expelled from the cell. To do this, the new virus buds on the cell surface and the bud is then snipped off. In the nal step, viral neuraminidase cleaves sialic acid. This acid binds the viral hemagglutinin to the host cell. This nal step can be blocked by neura­minidase inhibitors (Sect.31.5). The inhibitors zanamivir and oseltamivir have been very successful. The CCR5 receptor antagonist maraviroc has been introduced for the treatment of human immunodeciency virus (HIV) infection; the CCR5 receptor acts as an entry gate for the human immunodeciency virus and its inhibition blocks host cell invasion.
The body’s immune system has developed very effec­tive defense mechanisms. Antibodies are one such defen­sive weapon. These proteins are able to selectively bind to foreign substances with high afnity and present them to phagocytic cells (i.e., dendritic cells and macrophages) for degradation. This sophisticated, highly specic rec­ognition system for molecules ranging from very small low molecular weight antigens to complex macromolec­ular systems has been tapped for pharmaceutical therapy (Sect.32.3). Today, about 200 articially produced anti­bodies against awide variety of targets are used in the treatment of many different diseases. There is no end in sight, as many newly developed antibodies are currently in clinical trials.
There are very few truly “nonspecic” drugs. Antac­ids, which neutralize gastric acid purely chemically, be­long to this class, as do purely surface-active substances such as amphiphilic bactericides, fungicides, and hemo­lytics. Even the barbiturates, local anesthetics, inhalation anesthetics, and alcohol, long thought to be anonspecic agent, have been shown to have specic mechanisms of action. Frequently, the demonstration of aspecic effect has been made through the differential effects of pure enantiomers of aracemate. The β-antagonistic effect of an optically active β-blocker is associated with one en­antiomer (Sect.5.5). However, the nonspecic adverse effects on membranes are attributed equally to both en­antiomers.
Is there anything new to discover? An absolute sur­prise was the discovery that nitric oxide(NO), atiny gas­eous molecule, is also aneurotransmitter. Substances that release NO or interfere with NO biosynthesis lower or raise blood pressure (Sect.25.8). New subtypes of established receptors are constantly being discovered. The extent to which it makes sense to optimize acom­pound for absolute receptor specicity remains unsolved. It may well be the case that some compounds targeting multiple receptors or their subtypes are better suited for therapy than highly specic analogues. This is particu­larly true for compounds that bind to GPCRs. Here, the activity prole against awhole range of receptor subtypes is critical for the efcacy of acompound. Nu­merous GPCRs are even involved in our sense of smell, which follows this principle of multiple graded receptor responses (Sect.29.7). This is the only way to achieve the nely tuned and nuanced diversity of perception. This is abroad area of research. To date, especially with CNS agents, only clinical research can provide the results needed to make adecision about the therapeutic utility of acompound.

22.9 Resistance and Its Origin

Pathogenic viruses, bacteria, and parasites evolve resis­tance to drug therapy. Inappropriate and excessive use of antibiotics in the past has led to selection pressure for resistant strains. Unfortunately, hospitals are the primary site for the emergence and spread of resistant strains. The spatial proximity and concentration of different patho­gens is virtually unavoidable. In some cases, there are only afew effective weapons left, such as glycopeptide antibiotics. They should be used prudently and purpose­fully, even if this goes against the commercial interests of the manufacturer.
Most bacterial pathogens defend themselves against penicillins and cephalosporins by producing β-lact- amases (Sect.23.7). These are enzymes that open the four-membered lactam ring of these antibiotics to inac­tive cleavage products. During the long period of opti­mization of this class of substances, metabolically stable analogues as well as specic β-lactamase inhibitors have been developed.
The retrovirus HIV, which causes the immune de­ciency disease AIDS (Sects.1.3 and24.3), transfers its genetic information from RNA back into DNA. This process is aficted with an extremely high error rate of about one base mutation per generation. The high mu­tation rate leads to the rapid emergence and selection of resistant strains. In the last decade, many drugs with completely different modes of action against HIV have been introduced to the market, but resistances to many inhibitors have been observed very quickly, for example, against the HIV protease (Sect.24.5) or reverse transcrip-
Chapter  • How Drugs Act: Concepts for Therapy
22
tase inhibitors (Sect.32.5), and even multiple resistances. The mutated viruses are even resistant to several struc­turally different inhibitors! Combining different drugs against the same target is of little help here. Only acom­bination of compounds that hit the virus at completely different instances of its life cycle offers areprieve.
Tuberculosis is also re-emerging. Resistant pathogens require the development of new therapeutics. After the convincing success of mosquito control with DDT and therapy with synthetic antimalarials, malaria is making acomeback in developing countries (see Sect.3.2).
The major problem in anticancer therapy is the devel­opment of multidrug resistance (MDR) during treatment. The resistance is not only to the anticancer drug, but also to several other anticancer drugs. This multidrug resistance is due to the overexpression of a transporter (Sect.30.10), glycoprotein 170, which can largely elimi- nate structurally different xenobiotics from the cell. Al­though GP170 prefers cationic substances, another trans­porter, multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), eliminates amphiphilic anionic substances, i.e., com­pounds with polar and nonpolar character. However, amphiphilic substances are also capable of breaking the resistance of tumor cells. Quantitative structure–activ­ity relationships show that the resistance of tumor cells to certain drugs is mainly associated with similarities in their molecular weights, i.e., the size of the inducing agent, and its lipophilicity.
22.10 Combined Administration of Drugs
Combination drugs are popular with pharmaceutical manufacturers, physicians, and patients alike. Manufac­turers like them because they expand the indications for asuccessful drug and boost sales. Some physicians like the fact that therapy is simplied in many cases, while others oppose such combination products. One advantage for older patients is that they no longer have to take so many different drugs at different times of the day and in different doses, but only one or afew combination drugs. This improves compliance, because one of the most com­mon reasons for treatment failure is patient behavior. Ei­ther the regular dose is forgotten, or the patient takes abreak from the regimen over the weekend or while on vacation. These behaviors are particularly pronounced in elderly patients, with medications that do not have an obvious immediate effect, or with medications that have side effects that the patient subjectively perceives as un­pleasant.
Clinical pharmacologists, academics, and many crit­ically minded physicians have considerable reservations about combination products. This is understandable when one considers that apatient’s attitude to aparti­cu lar drug requires the observation of adose–response relationship over along period of time and, ultimately,
individualized therapy. In acombination drug, there is always axed relationship between the individual com­ponents. Many combinations, such as analgesics, contain components with different modes of action. These are often misused without astrict medical indication and must, therefore, be judged critically.
There are reasonable combinations that even oppo­nents to the general concept of combination therapy would accept without reservations. Among these are
l-DOPA preparations with which the side effects can
-
be reduced by selective combination (Sects.9.4, 26.10,
and27.8),
Antihypertensives and diuretics, the different mecha-
-
nistic principles of which complement each other,
Antibacterial preparations in which adihydrofolate
-
reductase inhibitor (Sect.27.2) is combined with an
appropriate sulfonamide,
Hormonal contraceptives (Sect.28.5), and
-
Polyvalent vaccines, with which asingle application
-
offers protection against multiple diseases.
In the case of l-DOPA therapy, only combinations of several agents reduce side effects to atolerable level. In the case of antihypertensives and diuretics, asingle prin­ciple is often not sufcient to achieve the same effect as combinations. In the case of sulfonamide combinations and antituberculosis compounds, multiple modes of ac­tion can prevent or delay the development of resistance. An inhibitor of the P450 family of metabolic enzymes may be justied as an adjunct to expensive drugs or to drugs used at very high doses. In this way, the concen­tration of the other drug can be maintained at ahigher level and for alonger period of time (Sect. 27.7). An important prerequisite for all combination drugs is an adequate therapeutic window and adapted pharmacoki­netics of the components, at least those that support the actual mode of action.
22.11 Synopsis
Arelatively small portion of the druggable genome
-
has been pharmaceutically addressed, and GPCRs
overrepresent the targets for which active substances
are available. Protein kinases represent aparticularly
promising emerging family of targets.
Enzymes are very popular drug targets, and the natu-
-
ral substrates often provide the starting point for ara-
tional drug design approach. There are three types of
enzyme inhibitors: competitive inhibitors, noncom-
petitive inhibitors, and allosteric inhibitors. Enzyme
inhibition can also be classied as reversible and irre-
versible. Nowadays reversible inhibition is desired, but
some very important drugs are irreversible inhibitors,
and some reversible inhibitors have such high afnity
that they are de facto irreversible inhibitors.

Bibliography and Further Reading



Receptors are also important drug targets; they can
-
be subdivided into GPCRs, ion channels, hormone receptors, and growth factor receptors. An agonist ac­tivates the receptor, an antagonist prevents the agonist from docking at its binding site, and an inverse agonist stabilizes an inactive conformation of the receptor.
Ion channels are extremely fast gateways for ions
-
and can be either voltage- or ligand-gated. Ions can ow only passively with the concentration gradient through an ion channel.
Transporters are special proteins in the membrane
-
that can pump molecules and ions (also named ion pumps) against the concentration gradient at the ex­pense of ATP hydrolysis. Many transporters are at­tractive drug targets, and others are responsible for the development of drug resistance.
There are alarge variety of known modes of action
-
for drugs. Some of the most diverse modes of action are found in anti-infective drugs. Furthermore, tumor therapeutics exploit diverse, toxic modes of action. The goal in addressing these modes of action in terms of atherapy is to nd apathophysiological process that is unique or is as unique as possible to the disease to spare healthy tissue from damage.
Drug resistance is an increasingly serious problem
-
and is both an inevitable occurrence associated with using apharmaceutical therapy, and a consequence of the misuse of anti-infectives. There are several mechanisms of resistance development in bacteria or viruses (i.e., fast genetic mutations), and in cancer therapy (i.e., aberrant transporter expression). These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive.
The issue of combination drugs is a controversial
-
topic. Some physicians are against them, and others are in favor of them, and both sides of the argument have good reasons. Nonetheless, some drug combina­tions are justiable and help with compliance, clinical efcacy, and safety.
Special Literature
M. Olah, R. Curpan, L. Halip, A. Bora, N. Hădărugă, D. Hădărugă,
R. Moldovan, A. Fulias, M. Mractc, T. Oprea. Chemical Infor-
matics: WOMBAT and WOMBAT-PK: Bioactivity Databases
for Lead and Drug Discovery, in Chemical Biology: From Small
Molecules to Systems Biology and Drug Design, Ed. S. L. Sch-
reiber, T. M. Kapoor, G. Wess, WILEY-VCH (2007) https://doi.
org/10.1002/9783527619375.ch13b
A. Gaulton etal., “ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for
drug discovery”. Nucl. Acid. Res., 40 (Database issue): D1100–7
(2011) R. B. Westkaemper, Serotonin Receptors: Molecular Genetics and Mo-
lecular Modeling, Med. Chem. Res., 3, 269–272 (1993) F. Saudou and R. Hen, 5-HT Receptor Subtypes: Molecular and Func-
tional Diversity, Med. Chem. Res., 4, 16–84 (1994) D. J. Austin, R. Crabtree and S. L. Schreiber, Proximity versus Al-
lostery: The Role of Regulated Protein Dimerization in Biology,
Chemistry & Biology, 1, 131–136 (1994) J. D. Hayes and C. R. Wolf, Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Resis-
tance, Biochem. J., 272, 281–295 (1990) N. D. Rawlings, F. R. Morton and A. J. Barrett, MEROPS: The Pepti-
dase Database. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D270–D272 (2006) M. Coll, S. H. Knof, Y. Ohga, A. Messerschmidt, R. Huber, H. Mo-
ellering, L. Rüssmann, G. Schumacher, Enzymatic Mechanism of
Creatine Amidinohydrolase as Deduced from Crystal Structures,
J. Mol. Biol., 214, 597–610 (1990) WOMBAT database: https://www.daylight.com/meetings/mug04/
Oprea/Wombat.2004.1.pdf (Last accessed Nov. 20, 2024)
ChEMBL database: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/ (Last accessed Nov.
20, 2024) Merops Database: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/merops/ (Last accessed Nov.
20, 2024)
Bibliography and Further Reading
General Literature
G. Folkers, Ed., Lock and Key—A Hundred Years After, Emil Fischer
Commemorate Symposium, Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae, 69, 175–269 (1995)
A. L. Hopkins and C. R. Groom, The druggable Genome. Nature Rev.
Drug Discov., 1, 727–730 (2002)
R. Santos etal., A Comprehensive Map of Molecular Drug Targets,
Nature Rev. Drug Discov., 16, 19–33 (2017)
P. Imming, C. Sinning and A. Meyer, Drugs, their targets and the na-
ture and number of drug targets, Nature Rev. Drug Discov., 5, 821–834 (2006)
J. P. Overington, B. Al-Lazikani and A. L. Hopkins, How many drug
targets are there? Nature Rev. Drug Discov., 5, 993–996 (2006)
The journals Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Chemistry & Biology,
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery and Pharmacon contain in each issue a highly topical article about the mode of action of a biolog­ically active substance

Inhibitors of Hydrolases with
an Acyl–Enzyme Intermediate
Contents
23.1 Serine-Dependent Hydrolases – 372
23.2 Structure and Function of Serine Proteases – 372

23.3 The S Determines Specicity – 374
23.4 Seeking Small-Molecule Thrombin Inhibitors – 376
23.5 Design of Orally Available Low Molecular Weight Elastase Inhibitors – 384
23.6 Serine Protease Inhibitors: Thrombin Was Just the Starting Point – 385
23.7 Serine, aFavored Nucleophile in Degrading Enzymes – 390
23.8 Triads in All Variations: Threonine as aNucleophile – 394
23.9 Cysteine Proteases: Sulfur, the Big Brother of Oxygen as aNucleophile in the Triad – 396
23.10 Synopsis – 400
Bibliography and Further Reading – 400
Pocket of Serine Proteases
1
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature 2024 G. Klebe, Drug Design, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68998-1_23
Chapter  • Inhibitors of Hydrolases with an Acyl–Enzyme Intermediate
23
Peptidases and esterases are hydrolytic enzymes, and 2–3% of all gene products can be assigned to this group of enzymes. They, therefore, represent an important group of target proteins for the development of new drugs and are of particular importance for structure-based drug design. In recent years, many of the known human or pathogen-derived peptidases have been tested as poten­tial targets for drug therapy.
The function of these enzymes is to cleave peptide or ester bonds, which requires anucleophile to attack the carbonyl group of the amide or ester bond to be cleaved. Alarge number of proteins use the OH or SH groups of aserine, threonine, or cysteine for this purpose. In the following chapters, we will see other hydrolyzing enzymes that use adifferent mechanism. During the cleavage reac­tion of the hydrolases discussed in this chapter, atempo­rary covalent bond is formed between the substrate and the enzyme. This intermediate, called the acyl enzyme form, occurs with serine, threonine, and cysteine prote­ases, but lipases, esterases, transpeptidases, and β-lacta- mases also use this reaction mechanism. The design of inhibitors for these enzymes that act via an acyl enzyme intermediate will be discussed. The following two chap­ters will discuss peptidases that use awater molecule for the primary attack on the peptide bond to be hydrolyzed: the aspartic and the metallopeptidases. Depending on whether they cleave the amino acid chain at the N- or C-terminus or in the center, peptidases are classied as aminopeptidases, carboxypeptidases, or endopeptidases. Some of these proteases are relatively unspecic, while others are highly specic and cleave only very specic substrates. It is the latter enzymes that are most likely to yield aselective therapeutic inhibitor with few side effects. Bacteria and viruses have also produced their own peptidases, the inhibition of which can be exploited for chemotherapeutic treatment. Since these proteins are not endogenous to humans and, therefore, have no function in humans, their inhibition should lead to therapeutic success without the risk of severe side effects.

23.1 Serine-Dependent Hydrolases

Serine proteases are the most abundant and best studied class of peptidases. They are closely related to esterases and lipases (hydrolases), which hydrolyze ester bonds. This class of enzymes serves the human body in many ways. Some serine proteases, such as the digestive en­zymes trypsin and chymotrypsin, cleave awide range of peptides and proteins. Others, such as the coagulation enzymes thrombin and factorXa, are highly selective and cleave only very specic substrates. Often, proteases are expressed in anonactive precursor form, called zy- mogens. In order to convert them to their active form, sequence segments of the zymogen polypeptide chain are often cleaved, which otherwise serve as endogenous
inhibitors of the activated enzyme. Release of the active form can occur either by autocatalysis (e.g., trypsin) or by other activating proteases (e.g., the coagulation cas­cade). Aserine side chain in the active site plays acrucial role in the catalytic mechanism of serine proteases, ester­ases, and lipases. It is characterized by an exceptionally high chemical reactivity. In chymotrypsin, only this ser­ine reacts with diisopropyl uorophosphate (DFP, avery potent neurotoxin), while 27other serine residues in the enzyme remain unmodied. Upon chemical conversion with DFP, the enzyme completely loses its catalytic ac­tivity.
23.2 Structure and Function
of Serine Proteases
The digestive enzyme chymotrypsin was the rst serine protease to have its 3D structure determined by David Blow in Cambridge, England. The numbering of the amino acids in chymotrypsin-type serine proteases is based on the sequence of chymotrypsin. The three-di­mensional structures of alarge number of serine prote­ases are now available, some of which are listed in . Ta­ble23.1. The structures show an extraordinary similarity in the active site, even for proteases that have completely different folding patterns (Sect. 14.7, comparison of trypsin/subtilisin). This so-called catalytic triad Ser–His– Asp is characteristic for serine proteases. In some of these enzymes, the aspartate can be replaced by aglutamate, while some transpeptidases and β-lactamases have aly­sine instead of the histidine in the active site.
Because these three amino acids are far apart in the sequence, the protein must fold appropriately to bring the three side chains into close proximity. The catalytic serine, located at position 195 in the trypsin-like prote­ases, performs the actual attack on the amide bond to be cleaved (. Fig.23.1). The oxygen atom of an unac­tivated hydroxyl group would not be reactive enough for this step. Its nucleophilicity, which describes its tendency to attack an electron-poor carbonyl carbon atom, is enhanced by the adjacent histidine side chain. The imidazole side chain of this histidine can accept aproton from the serine hydroxyl group, allowing the now negatively charged oxygen atom to nucleophilically attack the partially positively charged carbon atom of the amide carbonyl group. The neighboring aspartate group can take up aproton from the imidazole ring of the histidine and gives it back again. In this way, it com­pensates for the positive charge intermediately formed on the histidine residue. To stabilize the transition state formed during the attack on the carbonyl group, serine proteases have another characteristic structural motif, the so-called oxyanion hole. This is asmall pocket next to the side chain of Ser 195, composed of two main chain NH groups (. Fig.23.1). In a few cases, the terminal
ab
cd
. • Structure and Function of Serine Proteases
. Table 23.1 Serine proteases with physiological importance
(X=arbitrary amino acid). The 3D structures of all listed enzymes are known
Enzyme Cleavage site Function or thera-
peutic approach
Trypsin Arg–X, Lys–X Digestive enzyme
Chymotrypsin Tyr–X, Phe–X,
Trp–X
Elastase Val–X Tissue degradation
Thrombin Arg–Gly Blood coagulation
Factor Xa Arg–Ile, Arg–Gly Blood coagulation
Factor VIIa Arg–Ile Blood coagulation
Tryptase Arg–X Asthma
Matriptase Arg–X Oncology
Urokinase Arg–X Oncology
DPPIV Ala–X, Pro–X Diabetes
Furin Arg–X Viral infection
Digestive enzyme
amide groups of asparagine or glutamine can also per­form this function. The function of the oxyanion hole is to stabilize the negative charge formed on the tetra­hedral transition state and to distort the geometry of

the attacked carbonyl carbon atom from atrigonal-pla­nar to atetrahedral conguration. The formed transi-
tion state collapses with the release of the C-terminal cleavage product, which carries afree amino group at its terminus. The N-terminal cleavage product remains covalently bound to the protease to form an acyl enzyme intermediate. In asubsequent step, nucleophilic attack by awater molecule again leads to atetrahedral transition state. This tetrahedral transition state nally collapses, releasing the N-terminal cleavage product. The catalytic enzyme is then ready for the next transformation.
What happens when the amino acids serine, histidine, and aspartic acid of the catalytic triad of a serine pro­tease are individually or collectively replaced by amino acids without similar functional groups? In 1988, Paul Carter and James Wells at Genentech produced vari­ous mutants of the bacterial serine protease subtilisin (Sect.14.8). Replacing the catalytic serine or histidine with alanine reduces catalytic activity by more than six orders of magnitude. Surprisingly, exchange of aspartic acid, whose only function is to exchange aproton with histidine, reduced catalytic activity by more than four orders of magnitude. The combined exchange of several amino acids of the catalytic triad did not result in any further reduction in catalytic activity. The triple alanine mutant, in which the catalytic triad is completely re-

. Fig. 23.1 Catalytic mechanism of serine proteases. aThe peptide
substrate binds to the enzyme in specic pockets on either side of the cleavage site. b The oxygen atom of the serine side chain performs anucleophilic attack. This is facilitated by the adjacent histidine side
chain, which, supported by an aspartate residue, accepts a proton from the hydroxyl group. cThe transition state collapses to form an acyl enzyme intermediate. dThis intermediate is hydrolyzed by the attack of awater molecule to release the N-terminal cleavage product