Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5319_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface and Acknowledgement
- •Chemical Structures of Amino Acids,Molecular Graphics and Introduction
- •Introduction
- •Literature
- •Chapter Abstract Videos
- •Contents
- •About the author
- •1.10 Synopsis
- •1.3 The Battle Against Infectious Disease
- •1.4 Biological Concepts in Drug Research
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •2.8 A Long List of Accidents
- •2.10 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •3. Classical Drug Research
- •3.2 Malaria: Success and Failure
- •3.6 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •4.1 The Lock-and-Key Principle
- •4.2 The Essential Role of the Membrane
- •4.6 Blame It All on Water!
- •4.11 Lessons for Drug Design
- •4.12 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •5.1 Louis Pasteur Sorts Crystals
- •5.2 Structural Basis of Optical Activity
- •5.4 Lipases Separate Racemates
- •5.8 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •6.2 Lead Structures from Plants
- •6.9 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •7.2 Color Change Demonstrates Activity
- •7.7 Biophysics Supports Screening
- •7.11 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •8.1 Strategies for Drug Optimization
- •8.5 From Agonists to Antagonists
- •8.9 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •9. Designing Prodrugs
- •9.1 Foundations of Drug Metabolism
- •9.2 Esters Are Ideal Prodrugs
- •9.6 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •10. Peptidomimetics
- •10.1 Therapeutic Relevance of Peptides
- •10.2 Designing Peptidomimetics
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •11.4 What Is Contained in Chemical Space?
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •12.7 Silencing Genes by RNA Interference
- •12.9 Proteomics and Metabolomics
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •13.3 Crystal Lattices Diffract X-Rays
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •Bibliography and further reading
- •15. Molecular Modeling
- •15.2 Strategies in Molecular Modeling
- •15.3 Knowledge-Based Approaches
- •15.4 Force Field Methods
- •15.5 Quantum Chemical Methods
- •Bibliography and further reading
- •16. Conformational Analysis
- •16.8 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •18.4 Lipophilicity and Biological Activity
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •19.3 The Role of Hydrogen Bonds
- •19.5 Absorption Profiles of Acids and Bases
- •19.8 From In Vitro to In Vivo Activity
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •21.5 LUDI Discovers the First Leads
- •Bibliography and Original Papers
- •22.1 The Druggable Genome
- •22.4 Enzymes and Their Inhibitors
- •22.9 Resistance and Its Origin
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •23.1 Serine-Dependent Hydrolases
- •23.10 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •24. Aspartic Protease Inhibitors
- •24.2 Design of Renin Inhibitors
- •24.8 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •25.1 Structure of Zinc Metalloproteases
- •25.9 What Zinc Can Do, Iron Can Too
- •25.11 Synopsis
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •26. Transferase Inhibitors
- •26.1 The Kinase “Gold Rush”
- •Bibliography and Further Reading
- •27. Oxidoreductase Inhibitors

Bibliography and Original Papers
erized” form. In the exposed packing, aloop motif
assumes ageometry that is no longer consistent with
the original packing of the homodimer.
Below the loop, asmall pocket forms in the “pseu-
-
domonomerized” form that can accommodate small
fragments. The fragments can be diffused into crystals
of the enzyme and, thus, structurally characterized.
NMR spectroscopy provides evidence that these small
ligands can also bind in solutions and interfere with
the formation of the contact surface. They suggest
another principle for inhibitor design by interfering
with the functionally essential homodimer formation.
Atransient pocket that can form near the active site,
-
points to another design concept for developing selective inhibitors for the bacterial enzyme. Such inhibitors must approach acysteine that is unique to the
bacterial enzymes by lling the transient pocket in
order to undergo irreversible covalent inhibition via
the thiol group of the cysteine.
Several design concepts for the inhibition of the bac-
-
terial enzyme are emerging:
– Inhibition of the active site by potent inhibitors;
– Disruption of homodimer formation by active site
inhibitors that perturb the interface contact surface with long, spike-like substituents;
– Inhibitors that induce and stabilize formation of
the twisted, functionally incompetent homodimer;
– Small ligands that x aloop in the contact surface
in ageometry that blocks the formation of the
original homodimer; and
– Filling atransient pocket with inhibitors that irre-
versibly bind to the thiol group of acysteine residue present only in the bacterial enzymes.
Bibliography and Original Papers
C. Romier, K. Reuter, D. Suck, D. and R. Ficner, Crystal structure of
tRNA-guanine transglycosylase: RNA modication by base exchange, EMBO J., 15, 2850–2857 (1996)
U. Grädler, H.-D. Gerber, D. A. M. Goodenough-Lashua, G. A. Gar-
cia, R. Ficner, K. Reuter, M. T. Stubbs and G. Klebe. A New Target
for Shigellosis: Rational Design and Crystallographic Studies of
Inhibitors of tRNA-Guanine Transglycosylase J. Mol. Biol., 306,
455–467 (2001)
E. A. Meyer, R. Brenk, R. K. Castellano, M. Furler, G. Klebe, F. Die-
derich. De Novo Design, Synthesis, and in Vitro Evaluation of Inhibitors for Prokaryotic tRNA-Guanine Transglycosylase (TGT):
A Dramatic Sulfur Effect on Binding Afnity, ChemBioChem 2,
250–253 (2002)
R. Brenk, L. Naerum, U. Grädler, H.-D. Gerber, G. A. Garcia, K.
Reuter, M. T. Stubbs and G. Klebe. Virtual Screening for Submicromolar Leads of TGT based on a New Unexpected Binding
Mode Detected by Crystal Structure Analysis J. Med. Chem., 46,
1133–1143 (2003)
R. Brenk, M.T. Stubbs, A. Heine, K. Reuter, G. Klebe, Flexible adapta-
tions in the structure of the tRNA modifying enzyme tRNA-guanine transglycosylase and its implications for substrate selectivity,
reaction mechanism and structure-based drug design, ChemBio-
Chem, 4, 1066–1077 (2003)
R. Brenk, H-D. Gerber, J. Kittendorf, G.A. Garcia, K. Reuter, G.
Klebe, From Hit to Lead: De Novo Design based on Virtual
Screening Hits of Inhibitors of tRNA-guanine transglycosylase,
a putative Target of Shigellosis Therapy, Helv. Chim. Acta Vol.
86, 1435–1452 (2003)
W. Xie, X. Liu and R. H. Huang. Chemical Trapping and Crystal Struc-
ture of a Catalytic tRNA Guanine Transglycosylase Covalent In-
termediate. Nat. Struct. Biol., 10, 781–788 (2003)
E. A. Meyer, M. Furler, F. Diederich, R. Brenk, G. Klebe, Synthesis
Inhibitors for tRNA-Guanine Transglycosylase (TGT), Helv.
Chim. Acta, 87, 1333–1356 (2004)
R. Brenk, E. Meyer, K. Reuter, M.T. Stubbs, G.A. Garcia, F. Diederich,
G. Klebe, Crystallographic study of inhibitors of tRNA-guanine
transglycosylase suggests a new structure-based pharmacophore
for virtual screening, J. Mol. Biol., 338, 55–75 (2004)
B. Stengl, K. Reuter and G. Klebe. Mechanism and Substrate Specic-
ity of tRNA–Guanine Transglycosylases (TGTs): tRNA Modify-
ing Enzymes from the Three Different Kingdoms of Life Share a
Common Mechanism. Chem-BioChem, 6, 1926–1939 (2005)
E. A. Meyer, N. Donati, M. Guillot, B. Schweizer, F. Diederich, B.
Stengl, R. Brenk, K. Reuter, G. Klebe, Synthesis, biological eval-
uation, and crystallographic studies of extended guanine-based
(lin-benzoguanine) inhibitors for tRNA-guanine transglycosylase
(TGT), Helv. Chim. Acta, 89, 573–597(2006)
B. Stengl, E. A. Meyer, A. Heine, R. Brenk, F. Diederich and G. Klebe.
Crystal Structures of tRNA-Guanine Transglycosylase (TGT) in
Complex with Novel and Potent Inhibitors Unravel Pronounced
Induced-t Adaptations and Suggest Dimer Formation upon Sub-
strate Binding. J. Mol. Biol., 370, 492–511 (2007)
S. Hörtner, T. Ritschel, B. Stengl, C. Kramer, G. Klebe, F. Diederich.
Potent inhibitors of tRNA-Guanine Transglycosylase, an Enzyme
linked to the Pathogenicity of the Shigella Bacterium: Charge-as-
sisted Hydrogen Bonding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 46, 8266–8269
(2007)
T. Ritschel, C. Atmanene, K. Reuter, A. Van Dorsselaer, S. Sangli-
er-Cianférani, G. Klebe, An Integrative Approach combining Non-
covalent Mass Spectrometry, Enzyme Kinetics and X-ray Crys-
tallography to Decipher Tgt Protein-Protein and Protein-RNA
Interaction. J. Mol. Biol., 393, 833–847 (2009)
P. C. Kohler, T. Ritschel, W. B. Schweizer, G. Klebe, F. Diederich,
High-Afnity Inhibitors of tRNA–Guanine Transglycosylase Re-
placing the Function of a Structural Water Cluster, Chem. Eur. J.,
15 10809–10817 (2009)
T. Ritschel, P. C. Kohler, G. Neudert, A. Heine, F. Diederich, G. Klebe,
How to Replace the Residual Solvation Shell of Polar Active-site
Residues to Achieve Nanomolar Inhibition of tRNA-guanine
transglycosylase, ChemMedChem, 4, 2012–2023 (2009)
L. J. Barandun, F. Immekus, P. C. Kohler, S. Tonazzi, B. Wagner, S.
Wendelspiess, T. Ritschel, A. Heine, M. Kansy, G. Klebe, F. Die-
derich, From lin-Benzoguanines to lin-Benzohypoxanthines as Li-
gands for Zymomonas mobilis tRNA-Guanine Transglycosylase:
Replacement of Protein-Ligand Hydrogen Bonding by Importing
Water Clusters, Chem. Eur. J., 18, 9246–9257 (2012)
I. Biela, N. Tidten-Luksch, F. Immekus, S. Glinca, Tran Xuan Phong
Nguyen, H.-D. Gerber, A. Heine, G. Klebe, K. Reuter, Investi-
gation of Specicity Determinants in Bacterial tRNA-Guanine
Transglycosylase Reveals Queuine, the Substrate of Its Eukaryotic
Counterpart, as Inhibitor, PLoS ONE 8, e64240 (2013)
F. Immekus, L.J. Barandun, M. Betz, F. Debaene, S. Petiot, S. San-
glier-Cianférani, K. Reuter, F. Diederich, G. Klebe, Launching
Spiking Ligands into a Protein-Protein Interface: A Promising
Strategy to Destabilize and Break Interface Formation in a tRNA
Modifying Enzyme. ACS Chem. Biol., 8, 1163–1178 (2013)

21
Chapter • A Case Study: Structure-Based Inhibitor Design for tRNA-Guanine Transglycosylase
L. J. Barandun, F. Immekus, P. C. Kohler, T. Ritschel, A. Heine, P.
Orlando, G. Klebe, F. Diederich, High-afnity Inhibitors of Zy-
momonas mobilis tRNA-Guanine Transglycosylase through Convergent Optimization. Acta Cryst., Sect., D 69, 1798–1807 (2013)
S. Jakobi, T.X.P. Nguyen, F. Debaene, A. Metz, S. Sanglier-Cianférani,
K. Reuter, G. Klebe, Hot-spot Analysis to Dissect the Functional
Protein-Protein Interface of a tRNA-modifying Enzyme. Proteins,
82, 2713–2732 (2014)
M. Neeb, P. Czodrowski, A. Heine, L. Jakob, S. Barandun, C. Hohn,
F. Diederich, G. Klebe, Chasing protons: How isothermal titration calorimetry, mutagenesis, and pKa calculations trace the locus
of charge in ligand binding to a tRNA-binding enzyme. J. Med.
Chem., 57, 5554–5565 (2014)
M. Neeb, M. Betz, A. Heine, L. J. Barandun, C. Hohn, F. Diederich,
G. Klebe, Beyond afnity: enthalpy–entropy factorization unravels
complexity of a at structure-activity relationship for inhibition of
a tRNA-modifying enzyme, J. Med. Chem., 57, 5566–5578 (2014)
S. Jakobi, T.X.P. Nguyen, F. Debaene, S. Cianférani, K. Reuter, G.
Klebe, What Glues a Homodimer Together: Systematic Analysis of
the Stabilizing Effect of an Aromatic Hot Spot in the Protein–Protein Interface of the tRNA-modifying Enzyme Tgt. ACS Chem.
Biol., 10, 1897–1907 (2015)
L.J. Barandun, F.R. Ehrmann, D. Zimmerli, F. Immekus, M. Giroud,
C. Grünenfelder, W.B. Schweizer, B. Bernet, M. Betz, A. Heine, G.
Klebe, F. Diederich, Replacement of Water Molecules in a Phosphate Binding Site by Furanoside-Appended lin-Benzoguanine
Ligands of tRNA–Guanine Transglycosylase (TGT), Chem. Eur.
J. 21, 126–135 (2015)
M. Neeb, C. Hohn, F. R. Ehrmann, A. Härtsch, A. Heine, F. Diederich,
G. Klebe, Occupying a Flat Subpocket in a tRNA-modifying Enzyme with Ordered or Disordered Sidechains: Favorable or Unfavorable for Binding?, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 24, 4900–4910 (2016)
F. R. Ehrmann, J. Kalim, T. Pfaffeneder, B. Bernet, C. Hohn, E.
Schäfer, T. Botzanowski, S. Cianférani, A. Heine, K. Reuter, F.
Diederich, G. Klebe, Swapping Interface Contacts in the Homodimeric tRNA Guanine Transglycosylase: An Option for Functional
Regulation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 57, 10085–10090 (2018)
E. Hassaan, C. Hohn, F. R. Ehrmann, F. W. Goetzke, L. Movsisyan,
T. Hüfner-Wulsdorf, M. Sebastiani, A. Härtsch, K. Reuter, F. Diederich, G. Klebe, Fragment Screening Hit Draws Attention to a
Novel Transient Pocket Adjacent to the Recognition Site of the tRNA-Modifying Enzyme TGT. J. Med. Chem., 63, 6802–6820 (2020)
A. Nguyen, D. Nguyen, T. Nguyen, Tran, M. Sebastiani, S. Dörr, O.
Hernandez-Alba, F. Debaene, S. Cianférani, A. Heine, G. Klebe,
K. Reuter, The importance of charge in perturbing the aromatic
glue stabilizing the protein–protein interface of homodimeric
tRNA-guanine transglycosylase, ACS Chem. Biol. 15, 3021–
3029(2020)
D. Nguyen, X. Xie, S. Jakobi, F. Terwesten, A. Metz, T. X. P. Nguyen,
V. A. Palchykov, A. Heine, K. Reuter, G. Klebe, Targeting a Cryptic
Pocket in a Protein–Protein Contact by Disulde-Induced Rupture of a Homodimeric Interface. ACS Chem. Biol., 16, 1090–1098
(2021)
D. Nguyen, D. Abdullin, C. A. Heubach, T. Pfaffeneder, A. Nguyen, A.
Heine, K. Reuter, F. Diederich, O. Schiemann, G. Klebe, Unraveling a Ligand-induced Twist of a Homodimeric Enzyme by Pulsed
Electron–electron Double Resonance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl.,
60, 23419–23426 (2021)
A. Nguyen, G. Gemmecker, C. A. Softley, L. D. Movsisyan, T. Pfaff-
eneder, A. Heine, K. Reuter, F. Diederich, M. Sattler, G. Klebe,
19
F-NMR unveils the ligand-induced conformation of a catalytically inactive twisted homodimer of tRNA-guanine transglycosylase. ACS Chem. Biol., 17, 1745–1755 (2022)
M. Sebastiani, C. Behrens, S. Dörr, H. D. Gerber, R. Benazza, O.
Hernandez-Alba, S. Cianférani, G. Klebe, A. Heine, K. Reuter,
Structural and Biochemical Investigation of the Heterodimeric
Murine tRNA-Guanine Transglycosylase, ACS Chem. Biol., 17,
2229–2247 (2022)

355
Drugs and Drug Action:
Sucesses of StructureBased Design
V
The design and development of asuitable small‐molecule drug candidate for
agiven macromolecular target structure, selected from the universe of all possible
proteins, means nding the most suitable compound from the chemical space of
all conceivable pharmacologically relevant molecules. This is equivalent to the task
of merging both the chemical and the biological space. The gure tries to symbolize the intersection of these two spaces by the spiral nebulae of protein and ligand
structures merging into each other (announcement poster of the author’s working
group on the occasion of aconference in 2007, Rauischholzhausen, Marburg).

Contents
Chapter 22 How Drugs Act: Concepts for Therapy – 357
Chapter 23 Inhibitors of Hydrolases with an Acyl–
Enzyme Intermediate – 371
Chapter 24 Aspartic Protease Inhibitors – 403
Chapter 25 Inhibitors of Hydrolyzing Metalloenzymes – 427
Chapter 26 Transferase Inhibitors – 451
Chapter 27 Oxidoreductase Inhibitors – 483
Chapter 28 Agonists and Antagonists of Nuclear Receptors – 521
Chapter 29 Agonists and Antagonists of Membrane-
Bound Receptors – 537
Chapter 30 Ligands for Channels, Pores, and Transporters – 561
Chapter 31 Ligands for Surface Receptors – 597
Chapter 32 Biologicals: Peptides, Proteins, Nucleotides,
and Macrolides as Drugs – 625

How Drugs Act:
Concepts for Therapy
Contents
22.1 The Druggable Genome – 358
22.2 Enzymes as Catalysts in Cellular Metabolism – 359
22.3 How Do Enzymes Push Substrates Towards
the Transition State? – 360
22.4 Enzymes and Their Inhibitors – 361
22.5 Receptors as Target Structures for Drugs – 362
22.6 Drugs Regulate Ion Channels: Our Extremely
Fast Switches – 364
22.7 Blocking Transporters and Water Channels – 364
22.8 Modes of Action: ANever-Ending Story – 365
22.9 Resistance and Its Origin – 367
22.10 Combined Administration of Drugs – 368
22.11 Synopsis – 368
Bibliography and Further Reading – 369
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature 2024
G. Klebe, Drug Design, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68998-1_22

22
Chapter • How Drugs Act: Concepts for Therapy
How many drug targets and modes of action are there?
It has been estimated that currently available drugs act
on approximately 600–700 targets. Optimistic projections suggest that this number could be increased by
afactor of10. But this number is still small compared
to the diversity of proteins that play arole in our organism. Our genome has been sequenced. We know that
the number of our coding genes (about 21,500) is much
smaller than originally thought (Sect.12.3). However,
the number of relevant proteins encoded by these genes
is much larger because, among other reasons, versatile
posttranslational modications and alternative splicing
cause the genetic information to be diversied into multiple protein variants. So our genome is mapped, but do
we know the function of each gene? How can predictions about proteins and their functions and possible
roles in pathophysiology be extracted from this ood
of sequence information? Many of the proteins discovered in the genome can be assigned to protein families
based on sequence comparisons. Nevertheless, asignicant portion of our genetic information still awaits
annotation. The rst step has been taken, but what are
the spatial structures of these proteins for which only
sequences are known? Which ligands are recognized by
these proteins and what is their biochemical role in our
organism? The biochemical function, that is whether
aprotein is aprotease, an ion channel, or atransporter,
still does not provide information about the systemic
role of the protein in the functional processes of acell
or an entire organism. The spatial structure of aprotein is responsible for this function. For this reason,
the spatial structures of the proteins in our genome are
intensively studied or their geometries are predicted by
computer methods. The goal is to map the structural
space of all proteins as well as possible. Then it might
be possible to nd aspatially resolved and sufciently
homologous reference structure for each discovered sequence. Today, the structures of all members of afew
gene families have already been determined. It is only
amatter of time before we have the spatial structure of
all relevant proteins. The road may be long and ardu
ous, but it is clearly marked out. Will this revolutionize
the market for potential drugs and enable completely
new therapeutic approaches? The chemical space of all
conceivable compounds and the biological space of all
possible pathology-relevant proteins were discussed in
Sects.11.4 and 12.4. Drug design attempts to merge
these two spaces. In the cross-section of both spaces,
there are molecules to be found as candidates for potential drugs. This chapter attempts to provide an overview
of the range of mechanisms of action and some general
principles in the families of similar proteins and biomolecules. Details of the individual families can be found
in Chaps.23–32.
. Fig. 22.1 Distribution of the target proteins for drugs that are on
the market today
22.1 The Druggable Genome
Andrew Hopkins and Colin Groom rst provided an overview of the pharmaceutical market in 2002. Later in 2017,
amore comprehensive assessment of this market was
published by aconsortium of authors, suggesting some
shifts over the past 15years (. Fig.22.1). About onethird of the drugs on the market today inhibit enzymes.
Another 30% affect the behavior of G-protein-coupled
receptors (GPCRs). About 15% develop their therapeutic signicance at ligand- or voltage-gated ion channels.
Nearly 7% affect transporters. About 13.5% of drugs target nuclear hormone receptors. However, these market
shares do not correspond to the frequency of these targets in our genome. For example, GPCRs represent only
2.3% of our genome if sensory GPCRs are excluded.
GPCRs represent about 15% of the “druggable” genome,
the part of the genome whose function could be modulated by drug therapy. In contrast, kinases represent more
than 22% of the druggable genome, however, only 5.9%
of currently used drugs act on these enzymes. Due to the
long time span between current discovery research and
-
market launch, the drug market is expected to continue
to change in the coming years, especially as the proportion of macromolecular drugs, known as biologicals, has
recently increased sharply. These are not included in the
gures above.
In the chapters that follow, examples of individual
target structures that represent potential drug therapy
targets are presented. They are discussed on the basis of
their key structural features because the structure of the
target generally denes what is needed to qualify amolecule as an inhibitor, agonist, antagonist, or allosteric
modulator. These principles serve as a general concept
for the design of new drugs. In modern drug discovery,
the target structure for which anew compound is being
sought is usually known. In many historical examples of
drug development, this was not initially the case. Today,

. • Enzymes as Catalysts in Cellular Metabolism
. Table 22.1 Enzyme classication based on the four-digit number code
Class Name Biochemical function Examples Coenzymes
EC 1.x.x.x Oxido-
reductases
EC 2.x.x.x Transferases Transfer functional groups such as methyl,
EC 3.x.x.x Hydrolases Hydrolytic cleavage of molecules Esterases, Lipases, Phos-
EC 4.x.x.x Lyases Nonhydrolytic addition or cleavage of groups
EC 5.x.x.x Isomerases Intramolecular rearrangement and isomeriza-
EC 6.x.x.x Ligases Coupling of two molecules by the formation
Catalyze redox reactions; transfer of H- and
O-atoms or electrons between molecules
acyl, amino, or phosphate groups from one
molecule to another
on molecules, particularly double bonds,
cleavage of C–C, C–N, C–O, and C–S bonds
tion within amolecule
of C–C, C–N, C–O, or C–S bonds by using
ATP
Dehydrogenases,
Oxidases, Oxygenases,
Hydroxylases
Phosphotransferases
(including kinases) Aminotransferases
phatases, and Peptidases
Decarboxylases, Aldolases, Synthases
Racemases, Mutases Glucose-1,6-bisphos-
Synthestases, Carboxylases
NAD
FMD, and Liponic acid
S-Adenosyl methionine,
Biotin, cAMP, ATP,
Thiamine pyrophosphate
(TPP), Tetrahydrofolic
acid
Not needed
TTP, Pyridoxal phosphate
phate, Vitamin B12
ATP, NAD
+
, NADP+, FAD,
+
however, many modes of action are known. Peter Imming and his research group at the University of Halle,
Germany, have compiled asummary of the modes of
action for abroad collection of drugs in use today. In
addition, Tudor Oprea’s WOMBAT database at the Uni-
versity of New Mexico in Albuquerque, USA, provides
quick access to functionally annotated drugs along with
their characteristic properties. The ChEMBL database
continues to be atreasure trove for correlating the chemical structure and biological action of atarget structure.
22.2 Enzymes as Catalysts in Cellular
Metabolism
All metabolic processes, biosynthetic pathways, and
the regulation of important physiological processes are
mediated by enzymes. Enzymes are macromolecular bio-
catalysts that enable complex chemical reactions to take
place in an aqueous medium, usually at 37 °C and under
normal pressure. During evolution, families of enzymes
with analogous architecture and identical catalytic sites
have evolved. Small differences in the structure of the
binding sites result in quite different substrate specicities, making these enzymes either highly specic or highly
promiscuous, depending on the function required.
Enzymes do not bind particularly strongly to their
substrates and reaction products. The bound conformation of the ligand is often different from the energetically
most favorable conformation in aqueous solution. An
enzyme binds the substrate in ageometry that prepares
it for the transition state of the reaction. In addition,
polar groups can induce the necessary charge shifts. The
enzyme stabilizes the transition state of achemical reaction by the spatial arrangement and orientation of its
reactive groups. At the same time, the enzyme lowers the
activation energy of the reaction and allows for sometimes dramatic rate accelerations of chemical reactions.
After dissociation of the product, the enzyme is available
for the conversion of the next substrate molecule.
Enzymes are classied according to the reactions they
catalyze. An international commission has divided enzymes into six classes, each of which is assigned afour-
digit code (. Table22.1). The main class indicates the
type of reaction catalyzed (redox reactions, transfer
reactions, transfer of functional groups to water, cleavage and elimination reactions, isomerization of groups
within the substrate, or condensation or linkage of molecular groups). The remaining numbers classify, for example, which group is transferred or whether the protein
is regulated by cofactors. The MEROPS database, maintained by the Sanger Institute in Cambridge, England,
provides quick access and abroad overview of proteases,
their substrates, reaction mechanisms, and selectivities.
Chaps.23–27 review the major classes of enzymes for
which drugs have been successfully developed. Aseventh class has now been dened. It includes enzymes
that catalyze the movement of ions or molecules across
membranes or their separation within membranes. The
reaction actually describes the transfer of these particles,
and the subclasses differentiate the types of components
transferred. The next subclass further differentiates the
reaction processes that are the driving force for spatial
transport.

ab
cd
Chapter • How Drugs Act: Concepts for Therapy
22.3 How Do Enzymes Push Substrates
Towards the Transition State?
To illustrate how an enzyme prepares its substrate for
the transition state of a reaction, let us consider an example. The crystal structure of creatinase with its natural substrate creatine 22.1 and avery similar inhibitor,
carbamoylsarcosine 22.2, was determined in the research
. Fig. 22.2 The enzyme creatinase cleaves creatine 22.1 with water
into urea and sarcosine. The structurally very similar molecule, carbamoylsarcosine 22.2, is an inhibitor of this enzyme
group of Robert Huber at the Max Planck Institute in
Martinsried, Germany. The enzyme catalyzes the cleavage of creatine into urea and sarcosine (. Fig.22.2).
The central carbon of the C–N bond in the guanidinium
moiety of creatine is nucleophilically attacked by awater
molecule. All three C–N bonds in the guanidinium moiety have adouble bond character and the group prefers
aplanar geometry due to electron delocalization. How
does the enzyme manage to distort creatine towards the
transition state of the reaction to prepare it for nucleophilic attack and bond cleavage? The zwitterionic creatine
is bound by its guanidinium function through two glutamate residues that form two salt-bridge-like hydrogen
bonds (. Figs.22.3 and22.4). The opposite acid function nds strongly polarizing binding partners in two
arginine residues. In addition, awater molecule is found
near the central imine-like carbon atom in the crystal
structure. Next to it in the binding pocket is ahistidine
residue. This histidine orients the water molecule in exactly the right position and also supports the abstraction
of aproton from this water molecule. This increases the
22
. Fig. 22.3 a In the rst step, a water molecule is polarized by
aneighboring histidine so that anucleophilic attack on the imine-like
carbon is facilitated. bThen, the histidine transfers aproton to the
central nitrogen atom. cThe substrate reacts further in that aC=O
double bond is formed and the C–N bond is cleaved. dThe products
urea and sarcosine leave the binding pocket

. • Enzymes and Their Inhibitors
. Fig. 22.4 Upper row The vice-like xation of the creatine molecule
by two glutamate and two arginine residues causes atwist in the guanidinium group, which is planar in the unbound state. This disrupts conjugation across the guanidinium moiety and weakens the C–N bond to
be cleaved. The twist is indicated by the red and yellow planes passing
through the atoms of the guanidinium group. Middle row The neigh-
boring protonated histidine further polarizes the methyl-substituted
nitrogen atom and involves it in ahydrogen bond. In the course of the
reaction, the nitrogen atom takes on apyramidal conguration, deviating from the plane (yellow) of its next three neighbors. Bottom row
In the structure with the substrate-like inhibitor carbamoylsarcosine,
awater molecule can be found at aposition from which the nucleophilic attack on the substrate creatine is initiated. This occurs from above
and diagonally behind the C=N bond. (7 https://sn.pub/MXp0Uw)
nucleophilicity of the water molecule to form an OH−
group. The vice-like xation of the guanidine group by the
two glutamate residues causes atwisting of this building
block, which is, as mentioned, planar in the unbound
state. This disrupts the conjugation and signicantly
weakens the C–N bond to be cleaved. Nucleophilic attack occurs and atetrahedral transition state is formed.
At the same time, the now protonated histidine is able
to polarize the methyl-substituted nitrogen atom and involves this atom in ahydrogen bond. This prepares the
substrate for the transition state of the bond-breaking
reaction step. After the proton is transferred from the
histidine to the substrate, apositive charge is formed on
the nitrogen atom of the bond to be cleaved. Histidine
accepts aproton from the oxygen atom of the tetrahedral
transition state as aC=O double bond is formed, and the
central C–N bond is cleaved. The products then leave the
binding pocket. In this way, the enzyme creates astereo-
electronically complementary environment for the cleavage
reaction. Its polar groups position the water molecule
correctly for nucleophilic attack, and histidine induces
apyramidalization of the nitrogen atom in the bond to
be broken. At the same time, it serves as both aproton
donor and acceptor during the reaction.
The crystal structure in . Fig.22.4 was determined
together with carbamoylsarcosine. This molecule differs
from the substrate creatine in that anitrogen atom has
been replaced by an oxygen atom. However, this part of
the molecule does not carry apositive charge like creatine. The addition of the nucleophilic OH− leads to
decomposition and compensation of the charge in the
guanidinium moiety of creatine. Asimilar attack on carbamoylsarcosine would lead to the formation of anegative charge next to the two negatively charged glutamates.
This is energetically unfavorable. As aresult, the cleavage
reaction does not occur on this molecule, and the conversion is blocked. This example shows how perfectly the
substrate and the enzyme must match. Small changes can
drastically alter this system, turning asubstrate molecule
into an inhibitor of the desired transformation reaction.
22.4 Enzymes and Their Inhibitors
Enzymes can be organized into multienzyme complexes
that carry out multiple reactions on asubstrate sequentially. They can also form cascades in which one enzyme
activates the inactive precursor of the next enzyme. This
activation is passed on to the next enzyme, and the next,
and so on. The coagulation cascade (Sect.23.3) is activated by two independent pathways, each with several
steps that ultimately merge into acommon pathway.
Thus, asmall initiating event is amplied by several orders of magnitude. This is good for normal coagulation
after injury, but in the context of a coagulopathy (i.e.,

Chapter • How Drugs Act: Concepts for Therapy
atendency to form clots too easily), it can have disastrous
consequences!
Many inhibitors prevent the catalytic activity of an
enzyme by occupying the site where the substrate binds
site, the so-called orthosteric site. Such inhibitors are
called competitive inhibitors. In addition, there are al-
losteric inhibitors, which bind to another position on
the enzyme and cause achange in its three-dimensional
structure or dynamic properties. This can prevent the
enzyme from assuming the conformation necessary for
catalysis and lead to aweakening of catalytic activity.
Detailed studies of enzyme kinetics allow the distinction
between competitive and noncompetitive inhibition. Depending on the type of interaction with the enzyme, re-
versible and irreversible inhibitors can be distinguished.
In the case of reversible inhibitors, the binding to the
enzyme must be strong enough to reliably prevent the
conversion of the substrate. Some reversible inhibitors
form acovalent bond to the catalytic center that is chemically labile and, therefore, fully reversible, such as ahemiacetal bond. Irreversible inhibitors react with the enzyme
by forming achemically stable bond. These inhibitors, or
the reacting groups, cannot be removed and the enzyme
remains inhibited for the remainder of the enzyme’s life
until it is degraded by the organism. In addition, there
are naturally occurring protease inhibitors that bind reversibly but adhere so strongly that the complex is degraded before the inhibitor is released.
The rational design of an enzyme inhibitor usually
starts with the structure of the substrate. Aparticularly
successful approach is to mimic the transition state with
achemically analogous group that is not attacked by the
enzyme. Many examples of the design of such inhibitors
are given in Chaps.23–27. In general, irreversible enzyme
inhibitors play aminor role compared to reversible inhibitors, but important drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid
(ASA, Sect.27.9), omeprazole (Sect.30.9), clopidogrel
(an inhibitor of platelet aggregation), penicillins and
cephalosporins (Sect.23.7), and some monoamine oxidase inhibitors (Sect.27.8) belong to this group.
as the enkephalins (opiate receptors), neurokinins, and
endothelins for glycoproteins, as well as the group of
sensory receptors. Neurotransmitters are the endogenous
agonists of many membrane-bound receptors (Sect.1.4).
Nerve cells are connected to each other by synapses;
these are zones where chemical information is transmitted by neurotransmitters. The synaptic gap is located between the transmitting cell (presynaptic neuron) and the
receiving cell (postsynaptic neuron). Neurotransmitters
are synthesized in the presynaptic neuron and stored in
vesicles. Upon nerve stimulation, they are released into
the synaptic cleft. There, by binding to aspecic receptor on the postsynaptic neuron, they cause achange in
membrane potential, thereby stimulating that cell. After
reuptake into the cell, entrapment in vesicles, or degradation by, for example, the enzyme monoamine oxidase
(amines), esterases (acetylcholine), and peptidases, or in
glial cells by the activity of catechol-O-methyltransferase,
the effect rapidly subsides (see . Fig.22.7).
Inside the cell, these receptors act on G-proteins
(. Fig.22.5), which derive their name from guanosine
di- and triphosphate that they bind. All G-protein-cou-
pled receptors (GPCRs) are identical in structure and
function. They consist of aprotein chain with seven hydrophobic segments that penetrate the cell membrane
and anchor the receptor. These segments are connected
by loops. To date, about 800 human GPCR sequences
22
22.5 Receptors as Target Structures
for Drugs
Receptors are proteins or protein complexes that
Mediate the information exchange between cells
-
(membrane-bound receptors),
Regulate hormone-controlled gene expression (solu-
-
ble receptors or transcription factors), and
Are coupled to ion channels and control the ow of
-
ions into or out of acell along aconcentration gra-
dient.
Important membrane-bound receptors include those for
adrenaline, serotonin, dopamine, histamine, acetylcholine, adenosine, and thromboxane, and for peptides such
. Fig. 22.5 Schematic representation of the structure and function
of aG-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). The seven cylinders symbolize the seven transmembrane helices. The extra- and intracellular
loops that bind the helices are not shown. After binding an agonist,
the α-subunit dissociates from the so-called G-protein complex.
If aGs or G
generates an internal hormone, a“second messenger.” For example,
the membrane-bound enzyme adenylate cyclase generates cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) from adenosine triphosphate (ATP).
This second messenger can further affect target proteins via protein
kinaseA, or open an ion channel. To avoid an overreaction, cAMP
is constantly being degraded by the enzyme phosphodiesterase. G
proteins inhibit enzymes that form second messengers
protein is present, then an enzyme is activated that
q/11
i/0
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
