Английскй учебник

Any brush with legal language whether it is a mortgage agreement or the language of a will can leave one wondering why it is so complex and difficult to read. (2_______) For example, Peter Tiersma is currently working on the reforming of the language of jury instructions.

(II________________________)

The judicial process from point of arrest, through interview, charge, trial and sentencing is substantially linguistic and linguists have studied all aspects of this process. (3_______) There is some concentration on issues of language disadvantage in interviews whether this concerns those individuals that psychologists consider vulnerable or second language users. There is interest in the language of lawyers and witnesses and the effectiveness of linguistic strategies in cross-examinations.

(III_________________________)

Linguists have been called to give expert testimony in a variety of types of cases across UK and international jurisdictions. (4_______) As language is ultimately about the communication of meaning it is perhaps unsurprising that linguists sometimes give testimony as to what a person meant. One of the most celebrated linguist working in this area is Roger Shuy who has shown that a dispute over a threat, bribe or other language crime can be illuminated by a careful conversation and analysis.

Trademark disputes often concern questions of when a trademarked term begins to be used generically. Such situations can lead to the death of the trademark. For example if the generic verb to search the internet becomes 'to google' then Google will suffer trademark death, lose its legal protection and become a term any search engine can use. The examination of this process and whether it has occurred in a particular case is also an area where linguists have testified. In some cases a text of disputed authorship is compared with texts of known authorship in order to try to link texts by the same author. Such authorship analysis evidence has been used in a variety of cases across the UK, USA and Australian jurisdictions. (5__________)

2. + ! #. %

. ( ! $ (

– &).

A.The vast majority of cases where linguists are involved concern issues of linguistic competence.

B.There are perhaps three main areas of application for linguists working in forensic contexts; understanding language of the written law, understanding language use in forensic and judicial processes and the provision of linguistic evidence.

C.Linguists, for example, have a considerable interest in the language of police (and other) interviews of witnesses and suspects.

D.Forensic linguist applies linguistic knowledge and techniques to the language used in legal cases or proceedings and private disputes between parties which may result in legal action.

E.Linguists are interested in the nature of the complexity of legal language and also whether anything can be done about it.

F.Evidential texts have varied considerably in length and type in recent cases from SMS text messages to long terrorist conspiracy documents.

371

plagiarize – $ , $, $

12.pragmatics – , « »,

! $ , , $ -

13.stylistics – , $ , #'

!' $ ! ! $ -

$ $ $ ( ),

$ ! ! ( )

stylistic analysis – "

stylistic investigation – style-marker – " , $

14.stylometry – ( , ! # #' -

, -

, ! .

15.variability in language -

5 ! ( )

1..! ,. . . English for Professional Communication in Law. Problem Solving:

, $ « »;. ,. . ! ". 3.: 1+@.@-> , 2011.

2. !. . ! " " . . @" $".. 3.: 12(+@ !, 2006.

3. & " 2 " " . 4 $ 4. Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Part 4. $ " " " . Parallel Russian and English Texts. !- " " .'. / . English translation by William E. Butler. 3.: 1 @ #- , 2007.

4. & " $ " 2 " " . -1 2007 . 3.: ', 2007.

5.0 " .A. English for Students of Law: / .A. 0 " , ,.!. . /

3.: (+ 2, 2008.

6.( 2 " " ( 2). 3.: , 2012.

7. ( @. ., ( A. . " . -. 2- ., . 3.: "4 2", 1996.

8.@. . " " :. – 3 .. . -

12 (618). 3.: @ ( 3 , «2 », 2001, . 43-60.

9.2 !.(. !. . 3.: >, 2000.

10... . '## $ -$ . 3 , «2. », 2005.

11... ., > A.3. Upgrade your language skills. 3 , «2. », 2006.

373

12. 3- . ": #, # , E-mail, -. . 3 , !$, 2006.

13. . !.!. ! " " . . . . 3.: -

, 2009.

14.- $ " 2 " " . 3.: .( , , 2007.

15.$ " " « $ 2 " " ». 3.:, 2010.

16..,., @. . English of International Law: . 3.: + «3 % », 2010.

17..,., 0 !. ., ( !.@. Law and science: " . . . .,. ". 3.: , 2011.

18.Aitchison J. Words Pour into English. (Professor of Language and Communication University of Oxford). In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Third Edition with New Words Supplement. Longman, 2001, p. B23-B29.

19.Allsop J. Test Your Phrasal Verbs. Penguin Books, 1990.

20.Andrew Littlejohn. Company to company. Student’s book. Fourth edition. Cambridge University press, 2008.

21.Andrew Littlejohn. Company to company. Teacher’s book. Fourth edition. Cambridge University press, 2005.

22.Berlins M. and Dyer C. The Law Machine. Fifth Edition. Penguin Books, 2000.

23.Bill Mascull. Business vocabulary in use. Elementary to pre-intermediate. Second edition. Cambridge University press, 2010.

24.Bill Mascull. Business vocabulary in use. Intermediate. Cambridge University press, 2005.

25.Broughton G. The Penguin English Grammar A-Z for Advanced Students. Penguin Books, 1990.

26.David Cotton. David Falvey. Simon Kent. Language leader. Intermediate Coursebook. Second edition. Longman, 2011.

27.Davis Gordon Smith. English for telephoning. Oxford Business English, 2011.

28.ELT News and views. Issue 1(18) Samokhina T. Business English: what is it all about?

29.Forensic Science (An introduction to scientific and investigative techniques) /ed. by Stuart H.J., John J.N. / CRC Press, 2008.

30.Forensic Science. Modern Methods of solving crime / ed. by Max M. Hauck. / Greenwood Publishing Group, 2008.

31.Intermediate English Course. L., The Linguaphone Institute. [ . .]

32.Koppenhaver K.M., CDE (Board Certified Forensic Examiner). Forensic Document Examination: principles and practice. New Jersey, HUMANA PRESS, 2007.

33.Mark Powel. In company. Intermediate student’s book. Second Edition. Macmillian, 2009.

34.Michael McCarthy, Felicity O’Dell. English phrasal verbs in use. Intermediate. Cambridge University press, 2004.

35.Rivlin G. Understanding the Law. Oxford University Press. Fourth Edition, 2006.

36.Rowell R. Law Today. Longman Group UK Ltd., 1993.

37.Russel F., Locke Ch. English Law and Language. Prentice Hall International, 1993.

38.Siegal J.F. Forensic Science. The Basics CRC Press Taylor&Francis Group LLC, 2007.

39.Thomson A.J., Marinet A.V. A Practical English Grammar Exercises. Books 1-2. Oxford University Press. Third edition, 1986.

40.Tonya Trappe, Graham Tullis. Intelligent Business. Intermediate Business English. Coursebook. Longman, 2005.

41.Ward J. M. One hundred useful exercise in English. L.: Penguin Books, Ltd. 1987.

42.Watcyn-Jones P. and Allsop J. Test Your Prepositions. Penguin Books Ltd, 1990.

* * *

1. ! .+. . !-" " $. 3.: 2, 2005.

374

"). – 6- . . . – 3.: , 1994.

4./$) " -" $. . 3.: « . %», 1972.

5.Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs. Helping Learners with Real English. Collins Birmingham University International Language Dutabase, 1990.

6.Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Third Edition with New Words Supplement. Longman, 2001.

***

1.http://www.myforensicsciencedegree.com/25-surprising-facts-about-forensic-science/

2.http://moral.wjh.harvard.edu/

3.http://www.bfde.org/code-ethics.html

4.http://www.law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/web/reference/08experts.pdf

5.http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-ethics-and-morals.htm

6.http://graphicinsight.co.za/background.htm

7.http://www.businessballs.com/graphologytest.pdf

8.http://www.wikihow.com/

9.http://www.personalityquiz.net/innertraits/handwriting.htm

10.http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/plagiarism.shtml

11.http://www.learn-english-today.com/business-english/A-business-english-contents

12.http://www.englishdaily626.com

13.http://englishwell.org/

14.http://www.wikipedia

15.http://www.answers.com

375