Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Английскй учебник

.pdf
Скачиваний:
104
Добавлен:
16.03.2015
Размер:
8.7 Mб
Скачать

) a table of defence – ( ) b) a jury box – $ & "

c)places for public –

d)a place for a defendant and guard –

e) a witness box – $ "

f)places for questioned witnesses – ) "

g)an area of a presiding judge and a clerk – $ $

h)a table of prosecution – ( )

1.

5.

2.

6.

3.

7.

4.

8.

6.8 ! * , ., , ! - ! !?

7..

1.What are the principles of justice?

2.What is a criminal trial intended for?

a). “Justice is portrayed as blind, not because she ignores the facts and circumstances of individual cases, but because she shuts her eyes to all considerations extraneous to the particular case”. Lord Bingham (1999).

b)“To no one we will sell, to no one we well refuse or delay right of justice”. Magna Carta (1215).

c)“Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, established by law”. The European Convention on Human Rights (1953).

d)Let justice be done through the heavens should fall. Latin saying.

e)“The criminal justice system exists to help to protect us from crime and to ensure that criminals are punished”. Lord Irvine of Lairg (1998).

:

211

1. %1)07, 1 4 0 (+1

 

8

 

 

 

 

Present Simple

! '

Future Simple

! '

( V V+s )

 

(shall, will +V)

 

8. , -

. .

1.If someone commits a crime, he will be punished.

2.If someone commits an offence, he will be arrested by the police.

3.If the defendant pleads guilty to the charges against him, a judge will sentence him to the appropriate punishment.

4.If the defendant pleads not guilty, he denies committing the offence and the trial moves to the next stage.

5.A defendant has the right to challenge (to object to) any of the jurors if he can give a good reason for the objection.

6.If a juror knows a defendant, that will be good reason for objecting to him.

7.If the judge agrees with the objection, the jurors are replaced.

)0 %1)07, 1 4 0 (+1

 

8

 

 

 

Past Simple

& &

Should + V

& &

«!»

Would + V

 

( V+ed, 2 )

 

«!»

 

 

 

 

 

8. % ! # -.

1.If someone committed a crime, he (to be punished).

2.If someone committed an offence, he (to be arrested) by the police.

3.If the judge agreed with the objection, the jurors (to be replaced).

4.If a juror knew a defendant, that (to be) a good reason for objecting to him.

5.If the defendant pled not guilty, the trial (to move) to the next stage.

212

10. % ! #

.

1.If I (to be) a judge, I would try cases objectively.

2.If I (to be) a juror, I would listen to the evidence very attentively.

3.If he (to commit) a crime, he should plead guilty.

4.If the defendant (to plead) guilty to the charges against him, the judge would sentence him to the appropriate punishment.

,1%1)07, 1 4 0 (+1

 

 

8

 

 

 

Past Perfect

& & -

should + Perfect

& &

(had + V3 )

«!»

would Infinitive

«!»

11. # ,

, ! * , ! ...

1.If Mrs. Carroll hadn’t been well-dressed, the detective ….

2.If there had been many people in the shop, ….

3.If she had not chosen one of the most expensive dresses in the shop, ….

4.If the shop assistant had not wrapped it as quickly as possible, ….

5.If Mrs. Carroll had given a few small articles altogether with an expensive dress, ….

6.If the detective had not found out their relative ties, ….

UNIT 2. THE FIRST STAGES OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL

1. , & '. '-

' .

1) to arraign

6) to commit

2) to accuse

7) to punish

3) to defend

8) to object

4) to indict

9) to prosecute

213

5) to examine

10) to offend

2. . ( ! #!

.

committed, would be accused, were done, agrees, should have read, contained, were asked, would object, will be sworn, are chosen, would have helped, are replaced, should try, is given, are referred, are designed, would move, is committed, pled, is sentenced, are objected, had challenged, is followed, had been denied, is tested, had been questioned, are spoken, are admitted, would plead.

3. , ! ' ,

. ( ! #!

.

are to be tried, can give, is to help, must be sworn, has to say, is not allowed to ask, may talk, may have told, may be tested, was to interfere, were allowed to insist, should speak, was to agree, have to comment, must have depended, are to lead.

5. , ! ' -

$ .

1.Jurors have been chosen to try the case.

2.The defence asks questions in order to bring out what the witness has to say.

3.The cases to have been tried are very complicated.

4.To lead the witness into giving a particular answer is not allowed.

5.The defence lawyer has two bodyguards to protect him.

6.We shouted in order to warn everybody of the danger.

7.The prisoner was alleged to have brought dangerous drugs into the country.

8.There are exceptions to the hearsay rule for purposes of the mock trial. The court allows hearsay evidence to be introduced.

9.It is important for everyone to learn the words.

10.The prosecution and judges are, in some circumstances, allowed to tell the jury that they are entitled to draw adverse inferences from the accuser’s failure to give an explanation.

11.Anyone can ask to be excused from jury service because of particular personal circumstances: a blind, deaf or severely disabled person, for instance.

12.While imposing punishment the judge must consider his public duty. Is it the sort of crime that needs a long period of custody to protect the public from the offender?

6. ( ' . .

 

 

in

to

with of

 

 

for

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.

He is accused

 

 

 

 

murder.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.

He opened the envelope and read

 

 

the name of the winner.

3.

My mother objected

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

every boy I brought home.

4.

There is no need

 

 

 

 

 

a trial.

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.

A judge will sentence him

 

 

the appropriate punishment.

6.

He gave a good reason

 

 

objecting to him.

7.

Do you agree

 

 

 

 

corporal punishment?

8.

Henderson pled not guilty

 

 

 

 

the charge of murder.

214

9. The jury found her guilty

 

 

the offences.

10. He was charged

 

 

perjury.

7. .

TEXT

THE FIRST STAGES OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL

There are five vitally important principles of justice which govern every criminal trial:

Every person who is accused of crime must know what the accusation is. This must be set out in writing in the form of a charge, and it must state clearly what the person is alleged to have done.

A person can be convicted (found guilty) of a crime only on evidence which is given in open court.

-Evidence means the account of events given by witnesses (from their own knowledge of the events), who must swear on oath (or solemnly affirm) that they are telling the truth.

Open court means in a court which is open to the public, that is, anyone who wants to hear the case, including the family and friends of the defendant and the Press. They have to be over 14 years old.

In a criminal trial the burden of proving the defendant’s guilt is always on the prosecution.

This means that it is for the prosecution to prove a defendant’s guilt, not for the defendant to prove his innocence.

'No man shall be condemned unheard'. This means that whatever the case for the prosecution may be, the defendant has an equal right to have his or her case presented to the court, and to call evidence in support of that case.

Trial by jury is actually a trial by judge and jury. It is a partnership in which the two have separate parts to play – with the judge presiding over the trial and deciding all matters of law, and the jury deciding all questions of fact.

The trial begins with the arraignment (accusation) of the defendant. The defendant is accused in court of the offences which are to be tried. This is done by the clerk reading out the indictment, the document which contains the charges. After each charge is read the defendant is asked: «Do you plead guilty or not guilty?». If the defendant pleads guilty to the charges against him, this means that he admits that he committed the offences. Then there is no need for a trial, and a judge will sentence him to the appropriate punishment. If he pleads not guilty, he denies committing the offence and the trial moves to the next stage.

Twelve jurors are sworn to try the case. A defendant has the right to challenge (to object to) any of the jurors who are chosen to try his case, but only if he can give a good reason for the objection. For example, if a juror knows a defendant, or knows any of the witnesses in the case, that would be good reason for objecting to him. If the judge agrees with the objection, the jurors are replaced by others to make up 12.

The barrister for the prosecution makes a prosecution opening speech, telling the jury what the case is all about. The purpose of this statement is to help the jury to understand what the charge is and to follow the evidence when it is given. Then he calls the prosecution witnesses. They must be sworn and give evidence according to certain rules. The side (the prosecution or the defence), calling the witness asks questions first, in order to bring out what the witness has to say (the exami- nation-in-chief or direct examination). The party calling the witness is not allowed to ask questions that are designed to lead the witness into giving a particular answer (leading questions). Another important rule is the rule against allowing hearsay evidence. Witnesses may talk about what they

215

saw and heard, but not about what other people may have told them. The evidence of the witness may be tested in cross-examination by the lawyer for the other side (the defence or prosecution). He is allowed to ask any questions provided that they are relevant to the case.

8. ! .

1. to try an offence (a case)

a)

 

 

2. indictment

b) )$

3. case

c) $

"

 

 

4. to plead (not) guilty to the charges against

d)

$

) ( -

smb

) $ )

 

 

 

5. to commit an offence

e) *

6. to sentence smb to appropriate punishment

f) $ ( $) -

 

 

*

7. to deny committing the offence

g) $ &

8. arraignment (accusation)

h) $ )

9. to challenge any of the jurors

i) $ ( )

 

10. to give a good reason for objection (a ju-

j) $ - -

ror)

 

 

 

11. barrister for the prosecution

k) ", "-

 

"

 

 

12. examination-in-chief

l)

$

 

 

(&)

 

13. to lead the witness

m)

" ( -

 

"

)

 

 

14. hearsay evidence

n) $ "

15. cross-examination

o) ,

16. questions which are relevant to the case

p) $

 

 

17. burden of proving the defendant’s guilt

q) & , $ ,

 

 

 

 

18. to convict

r) $ ,

19. evidence

s) $, $

20. to put reliable evidence

t)

 

 

21. to swear an oath

u) *$

$ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

22. to allege

v) $, & $

 

9. , .

1), & " ;

2)$ ;

3)

& " - " ;

4)

$ ;

5)

$ $ , - $ ;

6)

$ $ ;

7)$ ;

8)) $ $ , .

216

10..

1.The principle of justice which governs every criminal trial is ________

a)open court

b)accusation of the defendant

c)the burden of proving the defendant’s guilt is on the prosecution

d)the defendant’s equal right to have his case presented to the court.

2.The trial begins with ____________

a)a prosecution opening speech

b)calling the prosecution witness

c)the examination-in-chief

d)the arraignment.

3.The indictment is a document which contains __________

a)charges

b)the appropriate punishment

c)the offence

d)a good reason for objecting jurors.

4.The party calling the witness is not allowed __________

a)to ask any questions

b)to lead the witness

c)to be cross-examined by the lawyer for the other side

d)to ask any questions that are not relevant to the case

11.( / #' ,

# # .

Models:

I am totally opposed to… – *

I feel (that) it is true – 6 #,

1.No principles of justice govern a criminal trial.

2.The defendant is accused in court.

3.The defendant never pleads guilty to the charges against him.

4.There is no need for trial if the defendant pleads guilty.

5.Twelve jurors are sworn to try the case.

6.The barrister for the prosecution must tell the jury what the case is all about.

7.The jurors must give evidence according to certain rules.

8.If a juror knows a defendant or any of the witnesses in the case he may try the case.

9.Witnesses may talk about what other people may have told them.

10.If the judge agrees that there is no case, he’ll direct the jury to find the defendant not guilty.

12. , .

information given in a court of law in order to prove that someone is guilty

the official in control of a court who decides how criminals should be punished

the process or act of bringing a charge against someone for a crime, or being judged for a crime in a court of law

the things that are said in a court of law to prove that someone is not guilty of a crime

217

someone who sees a crime or an accident and can describe what happened

the person in a court of law who has been accused of doing something illegal

an official in charge of the records of a court

a building or a room where all the information concerning a crime is given so that it can be judged

a group of 12 ordinary people who listens to details of a case in court and decides whether someone is guilty or not

a legal process in which a court of law examines a case to decide whether someone is guilty of a crime

a question or problem that will be dealt with by a law court.

13. , -

' %. / # .

2& $" (adversarial) " (inquisitorial) -

& $ . -$ & ). $ " . – & . $ -$ , ) ". $ % . -

& $ $ ,

$ ". &

$ ,

$

, ) $ $ ).

, , , -. $ & -. , ) ". $.

14. % ! . !" , )

' ; !) - !' , $ !. ( #

. - $ .

In my opinion…

I’m sure (that)…

- , …

 

On the one hand…

"

,…

On the other hand…

"

,…

I don’t think it’s reasonable to believe that…

- , $ $,

 

 

Thus

. ,

That’s why

%

 

As a result

$

 

In fact

+

 

In most cases

$)

Besides…

( ,…

 

What is more…

/ …

 

All right, you win

+ &, ( ) -

 

)

 

218

15. % ! - . ! . -

(F. R.) (/ '

) !, – '. + ,

.

Your Honour

– ) $ ( $ -

 

)

 

Objection

– &,

 

That’s a leading question

– + "

 

Objection, Your Honour, council is leading

– - , )

$, $

the witness

( ) "

That’s hearsay

– ' & ( $

 

 

")

That’s relevance

 

Objection, Your Honour, this question is ir-

– - , ) $, %

relevant to the case

 

 

F and R were both convicted of conspiracy to import and supply heroin from Pakistan. The case was that an informer, Jamil, with the approval of Customs officers arranged with R to import heroin, which was replaced by harmless powder once it arrived in England. Both F and R met Jamil at a railway café in Birmingham and discussed the procedure of obtaining samples of “heroin” for resale. When F picked up a bag containing the replaced powder he and R were arrested. They made untruthful accounts not realizing that their movements had been monitored and later when R was told he had been under surveillance he made admissions. In his defence F said that he thought that there was a medical drug in the bag, and blamed R. R said that he was on legitimate business and knew nothing of any drug and was supervising the delivery of lawful goods. He made admissions because that was what the Customs officer wanted to hear and he wanted to be freed as soon as possible.

UNIT 3. DEFENCE EVIDENCE, CLOSING SPEECHES AND JUDGE’S SUMMING-UP

1. ! # # .

directly

personally – usually – carefully –

separately –

2.#. .

1.He’s lived in both Britain and America.

2.She can both speak and write Japanese.

3.She’s the kind of person you either love or hate.

4.The equipment is neither accurate nor safe.

219

5.Her ring is twice as big as mine.

3.! .

one –

five –

six –

thirty –

ninety –

a hundred –

a million –

twelve –

two thousand –

4. .

defence evidence, prosecution evidence, to give evidence, to support evidence, to tailor evidence, false evidence, to comment on the evidence, important parts of evidence, stronger evidence, hearsay evidence, reliable evidence, to follow evidence, to hear the evidence, to offer no further evidence.

5. , # ) , -

; !) $ -

; ) , & #, ; ) -

, & & &

#, - .

To have been supported, to have been hold, to be deciding, to have been allowed, to be tailoring, to have been demonstrating, to happen, to have broken, to have been charged, to be preparing, to be made, to have been called, to have been commenting, to have been proved, to have been considering, to have been reflected.

6. ! «Complex Subject». -

' .

1.Judge’s summing-up seems to be fair and balanced.

2.The prosecution was expected to have charged the defendant.

3.The lawyer is known to support the case of the defendant.

4.The defendant seemed to have pled guilty.

5.The judge is likely to know a good deal about the defendant.

6.He is expected to be more lenient towards a defendant of good character.

7..

TEXT

DEFENCE EVIDENCE, CLOSING SPEECHES AND JUDGE’S SUMMING-UP

The defence evidence is the fifth stage of a criminal trial. The defendant may give evidence, and his lawyer can call any witnesses to support his case. The procedure of giving evidence is the same both for the prosecution and for the defence – examination-in-chief (direct examination), cross-examination.

A defendant does not have to give evidence, but the law is that if he does not, the jury may “draw inferences” from his failure to do so. In other words, they may hold it against him when deciding whether he is guilty. Normally, when a defendant gives evidence he must be called as the

220