Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
shpor_sayntifik.docx
Скачиваний:
2
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
177.86 Кб
Скачать

42. Give a definition of discussion/conclusion section in a research article or thesis.

The title of this subsection varies from journal to journal. As noted in Unit 3, some journals end with a subsection titled Discussion, some end with a subsection titled Results and Discussion and others end with a subsection titled Conclusions. In the first two cases the elements which need to be included in the Discussion are similar. Where there is a Conclusions section, it is short, usually comprising one or two paragraphs focusing on specific aspects of the Discussion. The graphic representation at the beginning of each unit is symmetrical because many of the elements of the Introduction occur again in the Discussion/Conclusion in (approximately) reverse order. The Introduction moves from a general, broad focus to the narrower ‘report’ section of the paper, and the Discussion/Conclusion moves away from that narrow section to a wider, more general focus. The Discussion looks back at the points made in the Introduction on the basis of the information in the central report section. In the Introduction, we wrote about the work of other researchers creating a kind of research map for our readers so that they could see what type of work existed in this field, in the Discussion/Conclusion we locate our study in relation to that research map. We then went on in the Introduction to locate a gap in the research or describe a problem associated with existing research, in the Discussion/Conclusion, we are expected to say to what extent we have responded to that gap or solved that problem. At the end of the Introduction we wrote about the present paper, creating an interface with the content of our own work so that we could move the reader on to the central report section of your paper, in the Discussion/Conclusion, as we will see, it is common to begin by revisiting some aspect of our work, so as to create that interface in reverse an enable you to move away from the central report section.

So as we can see, when we come to ask our three questions:

  • How do I start the Discussion/Conclusion section? What type of sentence should I begin with?

  • What type of information should be in this section, and in what order?

  • How do I end this section?

Although you may think that you have no idea of how to write the Discussion/Conclusion, we actually know a lot about what to include and in what order.

43. Explain why it is important to build a model for writing discussion/conclusion section.

Some magazines end subsection titled Discussion, some end subsection entitled Results and discussion with other finish subsection titled Conclusions. In the first two cases, the elements to be which will be included in the discussion of the same. Where there are conclusions section short, usually containing one or two point focus on

specific aspects of the discussion. The graphical representation at the beginning of each block is symmetrical

because many of the elements in the introduction occur again Discussion / conclusion in (approximately) the reverse order. Introduction. It is moving from the general, broad attention to "narrow Report" from paper and discussion / conclusion departs from the narrow section for a broader, more general orientation. Talk looks at issues raised in the introduction on the basis of information contained in the central section of the report.

First, write a brief description of what the author makes every sentence in the space below. Once you have tried to create its own model, you can use the key to help you to write this section research paper, when you eventually make it on your own. If you can not think of a good Description of the first sentence, to choose a lighter, fand start with this. Remember that your model is only useful if it can be transferred to other discussions / conclusions not to include content words such as the stressor, you may not be able to use the model to create Discussion / conclusions in its own field. Remember that one of the ways to find out what the author does in the verdict, not what he / she says, to imagine it, your computer accidentally deleted it. As I mentioned in the previous sections, yet another way to find out what writer does in a sentence - not what he / she says - is to look grammar and vocabulary hints. Do not expect to make a perfect model. You change your model when you look at the key, and perhaps again when you compare it with the path Forums Discussion / Conclusion of work in your targeted articles.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]