- •CONTENTS
- •PREFACE
- •ABBREVIATIONS
- •GENERAL AND COLORECTAL
- •CASE 1:
- •ANSWER 1
- •CASE 2:
- •ANSWER 2
- •CASE 3:
- •ANSWER 3
- •CASE 4:
- •ANSWER 4
- •CASE 5:
- •ANSWER 5
- •CASE 6:
- •ANSWER 6
- •CASE 7:
- •ANSWER 7
- •CASE 8:
- •ANSWER 8
- •CASE 9:
- •ANSWER 9
- •CASE 10:
- •ANSWER 10
- •CASE 11:
- •ANSWER 11
- •CASE 12:
- •ANSWER 12
- •CASE 13:
- •ANSWER 13
- •CASE 14:
- •ANSWER 14
- •CASE 15:
- •ANSWER 15
- •CASE 16:
- •ANSWER 16
- •CASE 17:
- •ANSWER 17
- •CASE 18:
- •ANSWER 18
- •CASE 19:
- •ANSWER 19
- •CASE 20:
- •ANSWER 20
- •UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL
- •CASE 21:
- •ANSWER 21
- •CASE 22:
- •ANSWER 22
- •CASE 23:
- •ANSWER 23
- •CASE 24:
- •ANSWER 24
- •CASE 25:
- •ANSWER 25
- •CASE 26:
- •ANSWER 26
- •CASE 27:
- •ANSWER 27
- •CASE 28:
- •ANSWER 28
- •CASE 29:
- •ANSWER 29
- •CASE 30:
- •ANSWER 30
- •CASE 31:
- •ANSWER 31
- •CASE 32:
- •ANSWER 32
- •CASE 33:
- •ANSWER 33
- •CASE 34:
- •ANSWER 34
- •CASE 35:
- •ANSWER 35
- •CASE 36:
- •ANSWER 36
- •BREAST AND ENDOCRINE
- •CASE 37:
- •ANSWER 37
- •CASE 38:
- •ANSWER 38
- •CASE 39:
- •ANSWER 39
- •CASE 40:
- •ANSWER 40
- •CASE 41:
- •VASCULAR
- •CASE 42:
- •ANSWER 42
- •CASE 43:
- •ANSWER 43
- •CASE 44:
- •ANSWER 44
- •CASE 45:
- •ANSWER 45
- •CASE 46:
- •ANSWER 46
- •CASE 47:
- •ANSWER 47
- •CASE 48:
- •ANSWER 48
- •CASE 49:
- •ANSWER 49
- •CASE 50:
- •ANSWER 50
- •CASE 51:
- •ANSWER 51
- •CASE 52:
- •ANSWER 52
- •CASE 53:
- •ANSWER 53
- •CASE 54:
- •ANSWER 54
- •CASE 55:
- •ANSWER 55
- •CASE 56:
- •ANSWER 56
- •UROLOGY
- •CASE 57:
- •ANSWER 57
- •CASE 58:
- •ANSWER 58
- •CASE 59:
- •ANSWER 59
- •CASE 60:
- •ANSWER 60
- •CASE 61:
- •ANSWER 61
- •CASE 62:
- •ANSWER 62
- •CASE 63:
- •ANSWER 63
- •CASE 64:
- •ANSWER 64
- •ORTHOPAEDIC
- •CASE 65:
- •ANSWER 65
- •CASE 66:
- •ANSWER 66
- •CASE 67:
- •ANSWER 67
- •CASE 68:
- •ANSWER 68
- •CASE 69:
- •Questions
- •ANSWER 69
- •CASE 70:
- •ANSWER 70
- •CASE 71:
- •ANSWER 71
- •CASE 72:
- •ANSWER 72
- •CASE 73:
- •ANSWER 73
- •CASE 74:
- •ANSWER 74
- •CASE 75:
- •ANSWER 75
- •CASE 76:
- •ANSWER 76
- •CASE 77:
- •ANSWER 77
- •CASE 78:
- •ANSWER 78
- •CASE 79:
- •ANSWER 79
- •CASE 80:
- •ANSWER 80
- •CASE 81:
- •ANSWER 81
- •EAR, NOSE AND THROAT
- •CASE 82:
- •ANSWER 82
- •CASE 83:
- •ANSWER 83
- •CASE 84:
- •ANSWER 84
- •CASE 85:
- •ANSWER 85
- •NEUROSuRGERY
- •CASE 86:
- •ANSWER 86
- •CASE 87:
- •ANSWER 87
- •CASE 88:
- •ANSWER 88
- •CASE 89:
- •ANSWER 89
- •ANAESTHESIA
- •CASE 90:
- •ANSWER 90
- •CASE 91:
- •ANSWER 91
- •CASE 92:
- •ANSWER 92
- •CASE 93:
- •ANSWER 93
- •CASE 94:
- •ANSWER 94
- •POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS
- •CASE 95:
- •ANSWER 95
- •CASE 96:
- •ANSWER 96
- •CASE 97:
- •ANSWER 97
- •CASE 98:
- •ANSWER 98
- •CASE 99:
- •ANSWER 99
- •CASE 100:
- •ANSWER 100
Upper Gastrointestinal
CASE 25: abDominal trauma
history
You are called urgently to the resuscitation room for a trauma call. An 18-year-old girl has fallen from her horse. During her descent, the horse kicked her, and she is now complaining of generalized abdominal pain and left shoulder-tip pain.
examination
She is talking and examination of her chest is normal. The oxygen saturations are 100 per cent on 24 per cent oxygen. Initially, her pulse rate is 110/min with a blood pressure of 84/60 mmHg. She is slightly drowsy and her Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) is 14. On examination of the abdomen, there is an abrasion on the left side beneath the costal margin with tenderness in the left upper quadrant. There is no evidence of any other injuries and the urinalysis is clear. The patient is given 2 L of intravenous fluids and the blood pressure improves to 130/90 mmHg. As the patient has now become stable, a CT scan of the chest and abdomen is obtained. The CT image is shown in Figure 25.1.
Figure 25.1 Computerized tomography of the abdomen.
On returning to the emergency department, the patient becomes increasingly agitated. The nurse informs you that her blood pressure is now 80/60 mmHg and the pulse rate is 130/min.
Questions
•What does the CT scan show?
•Are there any alternative investigations to CT?
•What special requirements may this patient have postoperatively?
53
100 Cases in Surgery
ANSWER 25
The patient has sustained a tear to the splenic capsule, causing intraperitoneal bleeding. The CT scan shows the fractured spleen with surrounding haematoma. The shoulder-tip pain described is known as Kehr’s sign, and is indicative of blood in the peritoneal cavity causing diaphragmatic irritation. Unstable patients suspected of splenic injury and intra-abdominal haemorrhage should undergo exploratory laparotomy and splenic repair or removal. Blunt trauma, with evidence of haemodynamic instability that is unresponsive to fluid challenge, should be considered a life-threatening solid organ (splenic) injury. Those patients who respond to an initial fluid bolus, only to deteriorate again with a drop in blood pressure and increasing tachycardia, are also likely to have a solid organ injury with ongoing haemorrhage. Transfer to the CT scanner can be extremely dangerous for an unstable patient.
Focused abdominal sonographic technique (FAST) is helpful in diagnosing the presence or absence of blood in the peritoneal cavity without transfer to a CT scanner. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage may be a valuable adjunct if time permits and multiple other injuries are present. In a haemodynamically stable trauma patient, CT scanning provides an ideal non-invasive method for evaluating the spleen. The decision for operative intervention is determined by the grade of the injury and the patient’s current or pre-existing medical conditions. Splenic embolization is a safe alternative depending on the grade and location of the splenic injury. Those patients who undergo splenectomy have a lifetime risk of septicaemia and should receive immunizations against pneumococcus, haemophilus and meningococcus.
KEY POINTS
•Whenever possible, the spleen should be conserved.
•patients require lifelong prophylactic antibiotics after splenectomy.
54
Upper Gastrointestinal
CASE 26: hepatomegaly
history
A GP refers an 87-year-old woman to the surgical outpatient department. The patient has had a 6-week history of constant right-sided abdominal pain which radiates up under the ribs and into her right shoulder. There are no relieving or exacerbating factors. She was fit and well up until 4 years ago, when she had a right hemicolectomy for a Dukes’ B caecal adenocarcinoma. She did not want any postoperative oncological treatment and there was no evidence of metastatic disease at the time of her operation. Recently, she feels she has lost weight and has felt tired. She describes no recent change in her bowel habit or rectal bleeding.
examination
There is no evidence of pallor, jaundice, clubbing or lymphadenopathy. The chest is clear and heart sounds are normal. Examination of the abdomen reveals a palpable irregular liver border about 3 cm below the costal margin. There are no other palpable masses in the abdomen and digital rectal examination is normal.
INVESTIGATIONS
in view of this woman’s history, a Ct scan of the abdomen is organized (Figure 26.1).
Figure 26.1 Computerized tomography of the abdomen.
Questions
•What does the CT scan show?
•What investigation would confirm the diagnosis in this patient?
•Give six other causes of hepatomegaly.
•What are the options for managing this patient?
55
100 Cases in Surgery
ANSWER 26
The CT scan shows metastatic deposits within the liver. It is likely this is recurrent disease after her previous colonic resection. A CT-guided biopsy would confirm the possible origin of these lesions.
!Causes of hepatomegaly
Smooth generalized enlargement
•hepatitis
•Congestive cardiac failure
•micronodular cirrhosis
•hepatic vein obstruction (budd–Chiari syndrome)
•amyloidosis
Craggy generalized enlargement
•metastatic secondaries
•macronodular cirrhosis
localized swelling
•hepatocellular carcinoma
•riedel’s lobe
•hydatid cyst
•liver abscess
A CT scan may demonstrate recurrence of the bowel malignancy. Tumour markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) may be raised, and a CT-guided biopsy of the liver deposits may confirm the source of the recurrence. It is important to send a full blood count as she has been feeling tired recently and may be anaemic. The patient should be brought back to the clinic, with her relatives, to discuss the options for further management. The number of metastases in the liver and their distribution would make local resection unfeasible. Chemotherapy may be discussed, but may not be appropriate in this patient. It is unlikely to prolong the patient’s life significantly and indeed may worsen her quality of life. The most important factor is to control the patient’s symptoms. A palliative care team should be involved in her continued management.
KEY POINT
•Colorectal liver metastases can be surgically resected, depending on their number, anatomical distribution and the fitness of the patient.
56