
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Foreword
- •Introduction
- •Cognitive therapy with in-patients
- •Why do cognitive therapy with in-patients?
- •Specific problems relating to cognitive therapy with in-patients
- •Case example (Anne)
- •Short case history and presentation
- •Assessment of suitability for cognitive therapy
- •Beginning of cognitive formulation of case
- •Session 2 (continuation of assessment for suitability for cognitive therapy)
- •Progress of therapy
- •Session 3
- •Session 4 (three days later)
- •Session 5 (next day—half an hour)
- •Session 6 (next day)
- •Sessions 7–26
- •Outcome
- •Ratings
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Cognitive treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia: a brief synopsis
- •A many layered fear of internal experience: the case of John
- •Second session
- •Tenth session
- •Postscript
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The behavioural model
- •Cognitive hypotheses of obsessive-compulsive disorder
- •The cognitive hypothesis of the development of obsessional disorders
- •The role of cognitive and behavioural factors in the maintenance of obsessional disorders
- •Applications of the cognitive model
- •General style of treatment
- •Assessment factors
- •Problems encountered in implementing assessment
- •Content
- •Effects of discussion
- •More specific concerns
- •Embarrassment
- •Chronicity
- •Broadening the cognitive focus of assessment
- •Treatment
- •Engagement and ensuring compliance
- •Further enhancing exposure treatments
- •Dealing with negative automatic thoughts
- •Dealing with concurrent depression
- •Dealing with obsessions not accompanied by compulsive behaviour
- •Relapse prevention
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgements
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Cognitive-behavioural hypothesis
- •Increased physiological arousal
- •Focus of attention
- •Avoidant behaviours
- •The importance of reassurance
- •Principles of cognitive treatment of hypochondriasis
- •Case 1
- •Treatment strategies and reattribution
- •Alternative hypotheses
- •Case 2
- •Cognitive-behavioural intervention
- •Case 3
- •Conclusions
- •Notes
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Prevalence of psychological problems in cancer patients
- •Why use cognitive behaviour therapy?
- •Specific issues in applying cognitive behaviour therapy to cancer patients
- •Grieving for the ‘lost self’
- •Locus of control
- •Physical status
- •Pain
- •Treatment issues
- •Longstanding deficits in coping strategies
- •Specific problems in applying cognitive behaviour therapy in cancer patients
- •Case study
- •Sessions 1 and 2
- •Session 3
- •Session 4
- •Sessions 5 to 7
- •Session 8
- •Sessions 9 and 10
- •Outcome
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Case history
- •Medical assessment
- •Psychological assessment
- •Treatment plan
- •Developing motivation for treatment
- •Rationale for treatment
- •Providing information and education
- •Weight restoration
- •Eating behaviour
- •Binge eating
- •Vomiting and laxative abuse
- •Identifying dysfunctional thoughts
- •Dealing with dysfunctional thoughts
- •Dealing with other areas of concern
- •Maintenance and follow-up
- •Being a therapist with anorexic and bulimic patients
- •References
- •Treatment of drug abuse
- •Drug withdrawal
- •General treatment measures
- •Cognitive models of drug abuse
- •A scheme for cognitive behaviour therapy with drug abusers
- •Engaging the patient
- •Establishing a therapeutic relationship
- •Motivation
- •Rationale
- •The role of negative cognitions in the process of engagement and commitment
- •Cue analysis
- •Problem solving and cue modification
- •Modifying situational factors
- •Cue exposure and aversion
- •Predicting and avoiding high-risk situations
- •Coping with high-risk situations
- •Modifying emotional factors
- •Underlying assumptions
- •Self-schemas in addiction
- •Modifying cognitive structures
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Other clinical approaches with the offender
- •Problems of working with offenders
- •Cognitive-behavioural techniques with offenders
- •General strategies
- •Explaining the role of cognitions
- •Developing trust
- •Collaboration
- •Common cognitive patterns in interaction with offenders
- •Self-defeat
- •Levels of involvement
- •Analysis of the offence
- •Assessing change; deciding on the need for therapy
- •Cognitive therapy
- •Case example
- •Presentation
- •Sessions one to three
- •Background
- •Exposure history
- •Analysis
- •The treatment decision
- •Session four
- •The issue of control
- •The issue of deterrents
- •Explaining the role of cognitions
- •The self-help task
- •Session five
- •Session six
- •Re-analysis
- •Session seven
- •Dependency
- •The issues of wanting to expose and pleasure
- •The issue of dissatisfactions
- •Session eight
- •Session nine
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Suicidal thoughts during therapy for depression
- •Secondary prevention immediately following deliberate self-harm
- •Outline for therapy
- •Vigilance for suicidal expression
- •Case transcripts
- •Reasons for living and reasons for dying
- •Evaluating negative thoughts within a session
- •Inability to imagine the future
- •Some common problems
- •Concluding remarks
- •References
- •Emergent themes
- •Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment
- •Engagement in and explanation of cognitive therapy
- •Techniques for eliciting thoughts and feelings within the session
- •Dealing with dysfunctional attitudes
- •Other applications of cognitive therapy
- •Application of cognitive therapy to clients with a learning difficulty
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3: Cognitive Restructuring
- •The cognitive framework
- •Different cognitive levels
- •Implications of a ‘levels’ model for therapy methods
- •Theoretical cogency of a ‘levels’ model
- •Future Research
- •Basic research on cognitive processes
- •Future strategies for clinical research
- •Note
- •References
- •Index
98 COGNITIVE THERAPY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
disadvantages of this way of thinking, look for evidence about how successful other people have been who have used this method, or weigh up the possible gains versus losses of putting themselves in high-risk situations.
A thorough cue analysis will allow therapist and client to predict which situations might be risky. At each session the week ahead can be previewed and any occasions when the person will be at risk identified and strategies for coping rehearsed. In the early stages of therapy, avoidance of high-risk situations is essential. As therapy progresses exposure to these situations may be programmed as part of an exercise in learning to cope with the cues for drug use.
It may be helpful to introduce the client to the concept of Apparently Irrelevant Decisions (Marlatt and Gordon 1985). People find themselves in high-risk situations through a series of decisions which at first seem perfectly innocent but on further inspection may not be so straightforward. A 28-year-old ex-nurse irregularly abused amphetamines. She described one lapse where she found herself at a loose end on a Sunday afternoon and decided to visit a friend. Since most of her friends were out of town she got on the train to visit a girlfriend who lived a few miles away. This sequence of events led her to the friend who supplied most of her amphetamines.
Coping with high-risk situations
If these situations cannot be avoided the person needs to find ways of preparing for and coping with them. The first step is to get some distance from any urges they may have. Clients can practise observing their craving, using what Emery (Beck, Emery and Greenberg 1985) refers to as the observing self. Another technique is to ride the swells and ebbs of craving like a surfer, a method which Marlatt calls ‘urge surfing’ (Marlatt and Gordon 1985). Whatever metaphor is used the principle is the same, i.e. being able to stand back sufficiently not to be engulfed by the feelings. The next step is to look for more active strategies to use in the face of craving. Distraction may be a useful short-term strategy, and similar methods can be applied to those used for anxiety. Since cognitions play an important part in maintaining craving, challenging craving-related cognitions will also be helpful. The usual methods of monitoring and answering back automatic thoughts apply equally to drug addicts, but addicts probably need to practise recording and challenging thoughts related to lesser degrees of craving as a homework assignment before exposing themselves to high-risk situations.
Because of the difficulties people have in thinking of rational responses when they are craving, it may be necessary to rehearse self-statements which they can use. A form of stress inoculation can be employed in which the patient induces a craving within the session and practises controlling it using self-statements. Coping imagery can be employed in a similar manner. Anti-craving thoughts can be encouraged and reminder cards can be written out to help the patient remember them when in a tight spot.
Interpersonal factors should not be overlooked. Social pressure, whether direct or indirect, accounts for 20 per cent of relapses (Cummings et al. 1980). Assertiveness training may be needed to help the patient say ‘no’. Social support can play a part, just as social pressure can. A simple but highly effective way of preparing for a high-risk situation is for the patient to arrange for a non-using friend to go with them. The cocaine user who made the daily assertion of the ills of drug abuse to his wife (see p. 168) worked in the music business. He found that he could not say no if he was offered cocaine at a concert, but if he took his wife with him he was easily able to resist.
Modifying emotional factors
The decision to take a drug in a high-risk situation is often made in a state of strong emotion. Depression, anxiety, and anger are negative emotions which can act as triggers, and cognitive therapy offers unique methods for dealing with them. The basic techniques of thought monitoring, identifying distortions, and challenging negative cognitions are described adequately elsewhere (Beck et al. 1979; Beck et al. 1985). We will illustrate how some of these can be applied with the negative emotions experienced by drug abusers.
During the initial weeks of her stay on the unit Jane experienced a great deal of anxiety. This was related to her withdrawal from valium as well as heroin. She was taught to monitor and challenge her negative automatic thoughts. She also had patterns of depressive thinking associated with a poor self-image. Both anxiety and depression seemed to occur when Jane felt herself to be under criticism or facing the possibility of rejection by other people. This was particularly evident in the drug unit where she was one of the few females and was also older than most of the patients. She found herself thinking They think I’m old and unattractive’. She also found her stance as one of the more mature people in the unit working for her recovery a difficult one, since it brought her up against the subculture of rebellion which existed in the unit at the time. Cognitive techniques focused on her fear of rejection and disapproval. She reassessed her own strengths and began to challenge her belief that she needed to be valued and approved by everyone. Role-play helped her to develop new assertive skills. She responded well to these interventions and the frequency of episodes where she became sensitive to supposed criticism reduced.