![](/user_photo/2706_HbeT2.jpg)
- •In close-up
- •In close-up
- •II d II
- •1. Analyzing a Song
- •2. Interview Practice
- •3. Writing a Resume
- •4. Comprehension Check
- •7. Essay Writing
- •8. Debate
- •1. Previewing and Anticipation
- •2. Scanning
- •3. Comprehension
- •6. Comprehension Survey
- •8. Cloze Summary
- •9. Summary
- •10. Discussion
- •7. Comprehension questions
- •11. Structural Analysis
- •12. Style
- •13. Comment and Discussion
- •1. Text Analysis
- •4. Discussion
- •6. Comprehension
- •7. Comprehension
- •8. Discussion
- •3.Continued
- •9 The Forgotten
- •1. Comprehension
- •2. Anticipation
- •3. Organization of the Text
- •4. Style
- •5. Producing a Filmscript
- •6. Structuring an Article
- •7. Discussion
- •8. Comprehension
- •9. Text Production
- •1. Comprehension
- •2. Text Reproduction
- •3.Discussion
- •4. Text Analysis
- •5. Comprehension Check
- •6. Cloze Comprehension Test
- •7. Guided Letter Writing
- •8. Interpretation of Photos
- •1987 License Laws for Passenger Cars
- •1. Text Analysis
- •2. Global Comprehension
- •3. Discussion
- •1975 1980 1981 1983 1986
- •8 30
- •I 4/86-1
- •4. Comprehension
- •5. Debate
- •6. Modified Cloze Test
- •7. Preparing an Interview
- •I Am The Redman
- •United States
- •1. Interpreting Poems
- •2. Previewing
- •3. Text Analysis
- •4. Comprehension
- •5. Discussion
- •6. Dialogue Practice
- •7. Comprehension
- •8. Discussion
- •9. Interpreting a Cartoon
- •1985 86.8 Million Households:
- •1970 63.4 Million
- •1. Scanning
- •2. Comprehension
- •3. Comprehension
- •I л li II
- •7. Comprehension
- •Independent
- •1. Continued
- •2. Continued
- •9 "If Conservatives Cannot Do It Now..."
- •Inflation
- •1. Comprehension
- •2. Analysis of a Speech
- •3. Questionnaire
- •4. Scanning
- •5. Simulation of a Debate
- •6. Writing Newspaper Articles
- •7. Global Comprehension
- •8. Text Analysis
- •9. Writing a Newspaper Article
- •10. Comprehension
- •11. Comparative Study
- •1981:128 1987:139
- •In the nuclear age, power politics, the struggle
- •9 American Policy in Vietnam:
- •2. Continued
- •It actually played to an American strength. American popular culture,
- •In fact, may be an emissary as important as Ambassador Burt himself—
- •Itself—and its major competitor, Pepsi.
- •1. Text Analysis
- •2. Text Analysis
- •3. Comprehension
- •4. Visual Comprehension
- •6. Interviewing
- •5. Discussion
- •Innovations at Glenbrook South make classes stimulating.
- •0: What are the subjects required in your four years of high school?
- •198 America in close-up
- •0: Is there a strict code of conduct at your school? 0:
- •1. Global Comprehension
- •2. Text Analysis
- •3. Discussion and Comment
- •4. Comprehension
- •5. Interpretation and Discussion
- •6. Dialogue Writing and Interview Practice
- •7. Text Production
- •8. Discussion and Comment
- •9. Comprehension
- •10. Comment and Discussion
- •11. Text Production
- •12. Comprehension
- •13. Text Analysis
- •14. Discussion
- •Religious Information
- •Religious preference
- •Based on national surveys and approximately 29,000 interviews
- •Impoverished within American society. Halfway through his speech, he was
- •1. Comprehension
- •2. Discussion
- •3. Analysis of a Speech
- •4. Note Taking
- •5. Discussion
- •6. Scanning
- •7. Text Analysis
- •8. Letter Writing
- •It's been said that you gave yourself 10 years to become a star. Is that true?
- •1. Structural Outline
- •2. Scanning
- •3. Comprehension
- •4. Interview Practice
- •5. Comparative Study
- •5. Continued
- •1. Comprehension
- •2. Text Analysis and Comment
- •3. Comprehension
- •4. Comprehension
- •5. Letter Writing
- •6.Preparing an Interview
- •Television
- •3. Global Comprehension
- •4. Choosing a tv Program
- •5. Comparative Study
- •6. Text Analysis
- •7. Letter Writing
- •8. Analysis and Discussion
- •9. Comment
Independent
government agencies
EXECUTIVE
Congress
can change laws;initiate
a constitutional amendment; restrict
jurisdiction of courts to hear
certain types of cases; create whole new court systems
or abolish existing ones;
expand or contract times and places that
federal courts sit
The
Congress House—Senate
May reject each other's bills
The Senate must confirm the
president's judicial appointments;
Congress can impeach and remove
judges from office
The
Court can declare lawsunconstitutional
The Supreme Court of the United States
Circuit Court of
Appeals of the
United States
District Court
LEGISLATIVE
JUDICIAL
POLITICAL
PARTICIPATION
By dividing power among the three branches of government, the Constitution effectively ensures that government power will not be usurped by a small powerful group or a few leaders.
The basic framework of American government is described in the Constitution. However, there are other features of the political system, not mentioned in the Constitution, which directly and indirectly influence American politics.
Groups and individuals have a variety of ways they can exert pressure and try to influence government policy. Many people write letters to elected officials expressing their approval or disapproval of a political decision. People sometimes circulate petitions or write letters to editors of newspapers and magazines to try to influence politicians. Organized interest groups, however, can generally exert influence much more effectively than can isolated individuals.
146 AMERICA IN CLOSE-UP
INTEREST
GROUPS
LOBBYISTS
POLITICAL PARTY SYSTEM
TWO-PARTY SYSTEM
MINOR PARTIES
Interest groups are organized by people who want to influence public policy decisions on special issues. There are many different types of interest groups in the United States. The largest organizations are labor unions, such as the AFL-CIO; business groups, such as the United States Chamber of Commerce; farm groups, such as the National Farmers' Union; and professional groups, such as the American Medical Association. There are many issue-oriented groups with broad concerns such as the environment, civil rights, and peace. Some interest groups focus on narrow issues such as the preservation of historic buildings or the control of neighborhood crime.
What all the various interest groups have in common is the desire to sway public opinion and political policy. The press, radio, and television are the most obvious media through which interest groups may influence voters and politicians. Members of interest groups also write letters to government officials, make telephone calls, hold public meetings, and sponsor newspaper advertisements.
To exert direct pressure on legislators in Washington or in state capitals, a major interest group may employ a professional lobbyist. A lobbyist, generally a lawyer or former legislator, is someone who not only specializes in the interest he or she represents, but also possesses an insider's view of the lawmaking process. Lobbyists work for interest groups by keeping them informed about proposed legislation and by talking to decision-makers about their group's concerns.
The term lobbyist often has a negative connotation. Public officials and others sometimes resent lobbyists' interference. Yet lobbyists fulfill vital functions. Besides voicing the concerns of a special group in society, they fulfill important needs of decision-makers. Legislators and their staff frequently turn to lobbyists for valuable data they would otherwise have to gather themselves. During the committee stage in the legislative process, for instance, lobbyists are invited to appear before congressional committees to provide advice and information, albeit one-sided, which will help the committee make a decision.
While they are not mentioned in the Constitution, organized interest groups and their lobbyists play a significant role in American democracy. The political party system is another important part of the political scene which is not described in the Constitution.
Historically, three features have characterized the party system in the United States: 1) two major parties alternating in power; 2) lack of ideology; and 3) lack of unity and party discipline.
The United States has had only two major parties throughout its history. When the nation was founded, two political groupings emerged-the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Since then, two major parties have alternated in power.
For over one hundred years, America's two-party system has been dominated by the Democratic and Republican Parties. Neither party, however, has ever completely dominated American politics. On the national level, the majority party in Congress has not always been the same as the party of the president.
Even in years when one party dominated national politics, the other party retained much support at state or local levels. Thus, the balance between the Democrats and Republicans has shifted back and forth.
While minor parties, also called "third parties," have appeared from time to time, and continue to appear, they have been conspicuous in their inability to attract enough voters to enable them to assume power. Occasionally, a third
THE POLITICAL SYSTEM 147
MAJORITY
PARTIES IN CONGRESSAND
PARTY OF THE PRESIDENT, 1861-1983
Years |
House |
Senate |
President |
1861-1863 |
R |
R |
R |
1863-1865 |
R |
R |
R |
1865-1867 |
R |
R |
R |
1867-1869 |
R |
R |
R |
1869-1871 |
R |
R |
R |
1871-1873 |
R |
R |
R |
1873-1875 |
R |
R |
R |
1875-1877 |
D |
R |
R |
1877-1879 |
D |
R |
R |
1879-1881 |
D |
D |
R |
1881-1883 |
R |
R |
R |
1883-1885 |
D |
R |
R |
1885-1887 |
D |
R |
D |
1887-1889 |
D |
R |
D |
1889-1891 |
R |
R |
R |
1891-1893 |
D |
R |
R |
1893-1895 |
D |
D |
D |
1895-1897 |
R |
R |
D |
1897-1899 |
R |
R |
R |
1899-1901 |
R |
R |
R |
1901-1903 |
R |
R |
R |
1903-1905 |
R |
R |
R |
1905-1907 |
R |
R |
R |
1907-1909 |
R |
R |
R |
1909-1911 |
R |
R |
R |
1911-1913 |
D |
R |
R |
1913-1915 |
D |
D |
D |
1915-1917 |
D |
D |
D |
1917-1919 |
D |
D |
D |
1919-1921 |
R |
R |
D |
1921-1923 |
R |
R |
R |
1923-1925 |
R |
R |
R |
1925-1927 |
R |
R |
R |
Years |
House |
Senate |
President |
1927-1929 |
R |
R |
R |
1929-1931 |
R |
R |
R |
1931-1933 |
D |
R |
R |
1933-1935 |
D |
D |
D |
1935-1937 |
D |
D |
D |
1937-1939 |
D |
D |
D |
1939-1941 |
D |
D |
D |
1941-1943 |
D |
D |
D |
1943-1945 |
D |
D |
D |
1945-1947 |
D |
D |
D |
1947-1949 |
R |
R |
D |
1949-1951 |
D |
D |
D |
1951-1953 |
D |
D |
D |
1953-1955 |
R |
R |
R |
1955-1957 |
D |
D |
R |
1957-1959 |
D |
D |
R |
1959-1961 |
D |
D |
R |
1961-1963 |
D |
D |
D |
1963-1965 |
D |
D |
D |
1965-1967 |
D |
D |
D |
1967-1969 |
D |
D |
D |
1969-1971 |
D |
D |
R |
1971-1973 |
D |
D |
R |
1973-1975 |
D |
D |
R |
1975-1977 |
D |
D |
R |
1977-1979 |
D |
D |
D |
1979-1981 |
D |
D |
D |
1981-1983 |
D |
R |
R |
1983-1985 |
D |
R |
R |
1985-1987 |
D |
R |
R |
1987-1989 |
D |
D |
R |
1989-1991 |
D |
D |
R |
R
Republican D
Democrat
© American Government: Principals & Practices, 1983, Merrill Publishing Company. Reprinted by permission of the publisher (updated)
148 AMERICA IN CLOSE-UP
ELECTION
SYSTEM
DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS
party candidate will win a seat in Congress or in a state legislature. Seldom, however, have minor parties been successful for more than a short period of time. In most cases, minor parties have been assimilated by the larger two or have just faded away.
Some current third parties in the United States are the Socialist Labor Party, the American Independent Party, the Libertarian Party, and the Peace and Freedom Party.
The way candidates are elected explains why two major parties have come to dominate the American political scene. Elections are held according to the single-member district system, based on the principle of "winner take all." Under this system, only one candidate —the one with the most votes—is elected to a given office from any one district. Many people will not vote for a minor party candidate; they feel they are throwing away a vote since only one person wins.
The Democratic and Republican Parties have supporters among a wide variety of Americans and embrace a wide range of political views.
POLITICAL AFFILIATION
Question: "In politics, |
as of today |
, do you consider yourself a Republican, |
|
|
| ||
Democrat, or an Independent?" |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
R |
D |
I |
|
R |
D |
I |
National |
26% |
43% |
31% |
|
|
|
|
Sex |
|
|
|
$15,000-$19,999 |
22 |
42 |
36 |
Male |
27 |
40 |
33 |
$10,000-$14,999 |
26 |
44 |
30 |
Female |
25 |
46 |
29 |
$5,000-$9,999 |
22 |
50 |
28 |
Race |
|
|
|
Under $5,000 |
19 |
56 |
25 |
White |
28 |
38 |
34 |
Religion |
|
|
|
Southern |
28 |
43 |
29 |
Protestant |
ЗП |
42 |
28 |
Non-southern |
29 |
36 |
35 |
Catholic |
?n |
48 |
32 |
Non-white |
7 |
80 |
13 |
Jewish |
12 |
54 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-southern |
5 |
82 |
13 |
Occupation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional & business |
33 |
34 |
33 |
Education |
|
|
|
Clerical & sales |
23 |
44 |
33 |
College |
31 |
34 |
35 |
Manual worker |
20 |
46 |
34 |
High school |
24 |
45 |
31 |
Skilled |
23 |
40 |
37 |
Grade school |
22 |
55 |
23 |
Unskilled |
17 |
51 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
Farmer |
40 |
32 |
28 |
|
|
|
| ||||
Region |
|
|
|
Non-labor force |
29 |
48 |
23 |
East |
24 |
44 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
Midwest |
26 |
37 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
South |
25 |
49 |
26 |
City Size |
|
|
|
West |
30 |
41 |
29 |
1,000,000 & over |
21 |
51 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
500,000-999,999 |
23 |
42 |
35 |
Age |
|
|
|
50,000-499,999 |
25 |
43 |
32 |
18-24 years |
21 |
38 |
41 |
2,500-49,999 |
30 |
40 |
30 |
25-29 |
24 |
3fl |
40 |
Under 2,500,rural |
30 |
39 |
31 |
30-49 |
24 |
43 |
33 |
Central city |
19 |
51 |
30 |
50 and older |
31 |
47 |
22 |
Suburb |
21 |
39 |
34 |
Income |
|
|
|
Labor Union |
|
|
|
$25,000 & over |
33 |
34 |
33 |
Labor union families |
?n |
m |
30 |
$20,000-$24,999 |
27 |
41 |
32 |
Non-labor union families |
28 |
41 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
R-Republican | ||
|
|
|
|
|
D-Democrat | ||
Survey taken October- December 1980 |
|
l-lndependent |
Source: The Gallup Opinion Index
© American Government: Principals & Practices, 1983, Merrill Publishing Company. Reprinted by permission of the publisher
THE POLITICAL SYSTEM 149
KEY
ISSUES
The parties tend to be similar. Democrats and Republicans support the same overall political and economic goals. Neither party seeks to shake the foundation of America's economy or social structure.
Democrats and Republicans, however, often propose different means of achieving their similar goals. Democrats generally believe that the federal government and state governments should provide social and economic programs for those who need them.
While Republicans do not necessarily oppose social programs, they believe that many social programs are too costly for taxpayers. They tend to favor big business and private enterprise and want to limit the role of government.
A poll taken in 1986 by Louis Harris and Associates reveals how Americans perceive the stance of each party on certain key issues:
Builds
up defenses
Cuts federal spending
Keeps economy prosperous
Handles federal deficit
Controls arms race Cuts unemployment
Works for peace
Controls defense budget
Gives women a break
Protects environment
Helps elderly and poor
к» WHICH PARTY FARES
BETTER ON THE i46% ISSUES?
HI Republican "1 Democrat
99%
LACK
OF IDEOLOGY
Because of these differences, Americans tend to think of the Democratic Party as liberal and the Republican Party as conservative.
American party politics has been largely devoid of ideology. Several attempts at developing an ideological party were unsuccessful. The Populist Party of the 1890s and the Progressive Party of the early twentieth century gained only temporary support. Senator Barry Goldwater, the Republican candidate in the 1964 election, tried to imbue his party with the spirit and force of a conservative ideology. Yet the election resulted in a landslide victory for Democratic candidate Lyndon Johnson. These examples suggest that Americans tend to prefer somewhat vague party programs to the rigors of political ideology.
150 AMERICA IN CLOSE-UP
LACK
OF PARTY
UNITY
PARTY ORGANIZATION
PARTY MEMBERSHIP
LOW VOTER TURNOUT
A third characteristic of the American party system, which sometimes confounds foreign observers, is the lack of unity and discipline within each party. Disagreement among members of the same party is common.
The voting records of Congressmen and Senators demonstrate a baffling lack of party unity. It is not uncommon for either a Democrat or a Republican to vote against the party line. There are conservative Democrats who agree with Republican ideas and liberal Republicans who agree with Democratic ideas. Personal views and the views of constituents often have priority over party views.
The loose organization of America's political parties helps explain this lack of unity within American parties, which contrasts sharply with more tightly-organized, ideologically-oriented western European parties.
In the United States, parties are decentralized, with relatively few members. Parties are organized as loose confederations of state parties, which, in turn, are decentralized down to the local level. Local party committees, which are numerous, are relatively independent of each other. Only during national elections do party committees join together to clarify issues. Party leadership, insofar as it can be located, is in the hands of a few officials and other notables.
The absence of an organized party structure and established hierarchy of leaders contributes to party disunity. Furthermore, candidates and elected officials are not held accountable for following the party line. Even at national party conventions, no formally binding party platform is drawn up.
Party membership is equally undemanding. Republicans and Democrats undergo no official initiation, pay no membership dues, and have no obligation to attend meetings or even vote for the party. Identification with a particular political party has less significance in the United States than in most other western democracies.
Political parties, interest groups, and elections are opportunities for citizens to participate in the democratic process. Many Americans, however, are politically uninvolved.
Although every citizen has the right to vote, the percentage of the voting age population that participates in elections is quite low. Voter turnout for presidential elections is usually under 60 percent, and the percentage is even lower for state and local elections.
Ill®
Ф.Риге
Political Participation in National Elections
f?
1964*
1966 1968* Percent
who reported that they
registered to vote
1970
1972* 1974 1976* 1978 1980*
„ .j.
Percent who reported
that they VOted •Presidential Election Year
THE POLITICAL SYSTEM 151
Voter
turnout in other democratic nations is much higher:
_L Percent of Voting Age Population
90 -
80
70
60
з у
115
и з 5
50
T
1965
1970
1975
1980
8°
Several factors may contribute to these differences in voter participation: —Unlike most of the nations shown on the graph, the United States requires early voter registration.
—Election campaigns tend to be much longer in the United States than in many other nations. After following campaigns that sometimes begin a year or more before the election, many Americans lose interest and do not vote. —American elections are always held on Tuesdays, a normal working day, whereas elections in many other nations are held on weekends. —The American two-party system may contribute to low voter turnout because voters' choice is limited.
—The other democratic nations shown on the graph have parliamentary systems, in which the outcome of the election determines both the executive and legislative branches of government. Voters in these countries may feel that their vote carries more weight.
The United States Constitution established a system in which the people have the right, whether they exercise it or not, to influence the direction of government.
152
part в Texts
Perspective
of a Public Man
An
Interview with Hubert Humphrey
The
late Senator Hubert Humphrey was a leading figure in American
government for more than30
years.
He served
as mayor of Minneapolis, United States senator, vice president and
was the Democratic party's candidate for president in 1968.
He
was an outspoken champion of civil rights, a strong advocate of
nuclear disarmament and
the author of much legislation on both domestic and foreign policy
issues.
In this interview with CLOSE UP, conducted in 1977, Senator Humphrey discusses his long experience in public life and the importance of inspiration and motivation in effecting change.
QUESTION
All of
the problems and policies that you
have been discussing emphasize the need for leadership
of the highest caliber in the halls of government. What
are the qualities which make someone an effective
leader of the people?
Senator Humphrey: Motivation. The difference between a great president and just a president is whether or not he can motivate people to greater achievements. As Teddy Roosevelt said, "You have to make the White House a bully pulpit." You have to be a combination of educator and evangelist. You have to move people. What we need in our society today is a kind of clarion call. People also need to learn to have priorities, because you can't do everything. That's where leadership comes in.
As a senator, I've always felt that my job is more than passing legislation. I see my role in politics as being the cutting edge of progress. I've spent most of my time out with the people, planting ideas by talking with hundreds of audiences. I've taken a lot of razzing for it, but I have my own methodology. I've tried to be a teacher as well as a senator. To do this you have to take your message out to the people. To be a teacher, you have to have more than a classroom, you've got to have students. You've got to have more than a rostrum, you've got to have people who will listen and you have to make your message sufficiently simple and yet profound. The good teacher is the one who knows how to simplify great, difficult problems and, at the same time, make them interesting so that he holds his audience. You have to recognize that it requires repetition. You must keep in mind that people can only absorb so much at any one session. You repeat, repeat, repeat with adaptation so that you make it interesting. It's like a song: Even the most beautiful classical music maybe has just two or three themes in it, repeated time after time in different variations. That is what a leader, what a teacher, has to do.
Hubert Humphrey
Another part of being a leader is being willing to run the risk of unpopularity. I don't like people in public life, particularly as presidents, mayors and governors, who can't make decisions. You have to make decisions.
Sometimes people come to me and say, "Well, the reason I have to vote like this is that the Gallup poll showed this or that." The Gallup poll is a momentary, current, unscientific survey of what is called public opinion. The important question is, "What do you think is right?" Now you don't ignore public opinion, but if you have a strong conviction, you do it. I, for example, had a strong conviction about civil rights legislation. There wasn't much public opinion on my side— I'll guarantee you that—and surely not among the political powerhouses. I ran right smack bang into all of them. But I felt I was right. And, if you feel you're right, you stay with it. Yet you also recognize that you can't get everything you want on day one. It may be a long, arduous process.
THE POLITICAL SYSTEM 153