Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1966_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
111
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
1. Аминов И. Х. Медикаментозная профилактика реактивного панкреатита после
эндоскопической ретроградной холангиопанкреатографии // Медицина в Кузбассе. 2013. № 4
(12). C. 8–14.
2. Ахтанин Е. А., Кригер А. Г. Причины возникновения и профилактика панкреатических свищей
после резекционных операций на поджелудочной железе. // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И.
Пирогова. 2014. (5). C. 79-83.
3. Брайерли Дж. Д., Господарович Дж. Д. TNM Классификация злокачественных опухолей, 8
издание / Дж. Д. Брайерли, Дж. Д. Господарович, под ред. Е. А. Дубовая, К. А. Павлова, Москва:
Логосфера, 2018. 344 c.
4. Велигоцкий Н. Н., Велигоцкий А. Н., Арутюнов С. Э. Осложнения после
панкреатодуоденальной резекции при раке головки поджелудочной железы и большого
дуоденального сосочка. // Вестник неотложной и восстановительной медицины. 2012. № 3 (12).
C. 475–480.
5. Восканян С. Э., Коротько Г. Ф. Морфофункциональная организация поджелудочной железы и
острый послеоперационный панкреатит (экспериментальные и клинические аспекты). //
Литтерра. 2017. C. 528–532.
6. Гаврилюк Б. К., Рочев Ю. А., Паклин Е. Л. Покрытие для ран и способ его получения // Патент
России № 2091082C1.2001.
7. Дроздов Е. С. [и др.]. Прогнозирование риска развития послеоперационной панкреатической
фистулы у пациентов, перенесших дистальную резекцию поджелудочной железы:
ретроспективное контролируемое исследование // Кубанский научный медицинский вестник.
2021. № 28 (2). C. 33–45.
8. Дроздов Е. С., Короткевич А. Г., Грищенко М. Ю. Способ прогнозирования развития
клинически значимой панкреатической фистулы после панкреатодуоденальной резекции //
Патент России № RU2798660C1.2023. Бюл. № 18.
9. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2022 году (заболеваемость и смертность) / под
ред. А. Д. Каприна [и др.]., Москва: Филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России,
2022. 275 c.
10. Кабанов М. Ю. [и др.]. Состояние проблемы развития панкреатической фистулы у пациентов,
перенесших панкреатодуоденальную резекцию. // Вестник Национального медико-
хирургического Центра им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2017. № 2 (12). C. 112–116.
112
11. Камалова Э. Г., Давыдова В. А., Лазарева Д. Н. Противовоспалительная активность
некоторых производных сульфолана // Фармакология и токсикология. 1979. (3). C. 261–265.
12. Качмазова А. В. [и др.]. Эндоскопическое формирование гастропанкреатикоанастомоза у
пациента с наружным панкреатическим свищом после панкреатодуоденальной резекции. //
Эндоскопическая хирургия. 2024. (2). C. 66–72.
13. Коваленко З. А., Ефанов М. Г. Шкалы прогноза панкреатической фистулы после операции
Уиппла. Аналитический обзор литературы. // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2021. (7). C.
71–76.
14. Кригер А. Г., Кубышкин В. А., Карамазовский Г. Г. Послеоперационный панкреатит при
хирургических вмешательствах на поджелудочной железе // Хирургия. 2012. (4). C. 14–19.
15. Кубышкин В. А., Вишневский В. А. Рак поджелудочной железы. // Медпрактика. 2003. C. 375.
16. Кудрявцев П. Л. Особенности хирургической тактики при панкреатических свищах //
Диссертация кандидата медицинских наук // Диссертация кандидата медицинских наук. Москва.
2017. C. 127.
17. Михайлов М. М. Диагностика и лечение опухолей дистального отдела поджелудочной
железы / М. М. Михайлов, 2001. 144 c.
18. Покатаев И. А. [и др.]. Рак поджелудочной железы // Malignant tumours. 2023. (13). C. 555–
572.
19. Саакян М. А., Степанян С. А., Габриэлян А. М. Факторы риска панкреатических свищей после
панкреатодуоденальной резекции // Новый армянский медицинский журнал. 2015. (9, 4). C. 95–
101.
20. Северцев А. Г. Дистальная резекция en bloc поджелудочной железы и общей печеночной
артерии: «модифицированная операция Appleby» // Доказательная гастроэнтерология. 2013. (3).
C. 3–8.
21. Солодкий В. А. [и др.]. Панкреатодуоденальная резекция — результаты и перспективы
(двухцентровое исследование). // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2023. (5). C. 13–21.
22. Суворов В. А. [и др.]. Прогнозирование панкреатической фистулы после
панкреатодуоденальной резекции с использованием машинного обучения // Сибирский журнал
онкологии. 2024. № 6 (22). C. 25–34.
23. Толстиков А. Г., Толстиков Г. А., Воробьева А. И. Медицинский клей // Патент России №
2156140C1.2014.
24. Хатьков И. Е., Домрачев С. А., Цвиркун В. В. Прогнозирование панкреатической фистулы
после панкреатодуоденальной резекции с помощью компьютерной томографии. // Медицинская
визуализация. 2019. № 1 (23). C. 19–27.
113
25. Adiamah A. [et al.]. The Use of Prophylactic Somatostatin Therapy Following
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Meta‐analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials // World Journal of
Surgery. 2019. № 7 (43). C. 1788–1801.
26. Bassi C. [et al.]. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition //
Surgery. 2005. № 1 (138). C. 8–13.
27. Bassi C. [et al.]. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading
of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After // Surgery. 2017. № 3 (161). C. 584–591.
28. Bauer W. [et al.]. SMS 201–995: A very potent and selective octapeptide analogue of somatostatin
with prolonged action // Life Sciences. 1982. № 11 (31). C. 1133–1140.
29. Berrar D. Cross-Validation. Elsevier, 2019.C. 542–545.
30. Bilimoria K. Y. [et al.]. Prognostic Score Predicting Survival After Resection of Pancreatic
Neuroendocrine Tumors // Annals of Surgery. 2008. № 3 (247). C. 490–500.
31. Bock E. A. [et al.]. Late Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy with
Pancreaticogastrostomy // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2012. № 5 (16). C. 914–919.
32. Bonsdorff A., Sallinen V. Prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula and pancreatitis after
pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy: A review. // Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS :
official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. 2023. № 2 (112).
C. 126–134.
33. Callery M. P. [et al.]. A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic
Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy // Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013. № 1 (216).
C. 1–14.
34. Callery M. P., Pratt W. B., Vollmer C. M. Prevention and Management of Pancreatic Fistula //
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2009. № 1 (13). C. 163–173.
35. Carlo V. Di [et al.]. Pancreatoduodenectomy with occlusion of the residual stump by Neoprene
®
injection // World Journal of Surgery. 1989. № 1 (13). C. 105–110.
36. Carrington A. M. [et al.]. Deep ROC Analysis and AUC as Balanced Average Accuracy, for
Improved Classifier Selection, Audit and Explanation // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and
Machine Intelligence. 2023. № 1 (45). C. 329–341.
37. Carter J. V. [et al.]. ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic
curves // Surgery. 2016. № 6 (159). C. 1638–1645.
38. Chen H. [et al.]. The effect of perioperative of dexamethasone on postoperative complications after
pancreaticoduodenectomy (PANDEX): a study protocol for a pragmatic multicenter randomized
controlled trial // Trials. 2023. № 1 (24). C. 569.
39. Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. // Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of
Edinburgh. 1994. № 3 (39). C. 178–84.
114
40. Dongen J. C. van [et al.]. Fistula Risk Score for Auditing Pancreatoduodenectomy: The Auditing-
FRS. // Annals of surgery. 2023. № 2 (278). C. 272–277.
41. Fischer L. [et al.]. Clinical outcome and long-term survival in 118 consecutive patients with
neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas // British Journal of Surgery. 2008. № 5 (95). C. 627–635.
42. Gavin Hackeling Mastering Machine Learning with scikit-learn / Gavin Hackeling, 2-е изд.,
Birmingham: Packt Pubishing Ltd., 2017.
43. Gerstle J. T., Kauffman G. L., Koltun W. A. The incidence, management, and outcome of patients
with gastrointestinal carcinoids and second primary malignancies. // Journal of the American College of
Surgeons. 1995. № 4 (180). C. 427–32.
44. Geurts P., Ernst. D. W. L. Extremely randomized trees. // Machine Learning. 2006. № 1 (63). C. 3–
42.
45. Grego A. [et al.]. Does Pancreatic Fistula Affect Long-Term Survival after Resection for Pancreatic
Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Cancers. 2021. № 22 (13). C. 5803.
46. Hackert T. [et al.]. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: We need to redefine grades B and C // Surgery.
2016. № 3 (159). C. 872–877.
47. Hackert T., Werner J., Büchler M. W. Postoperative pancreatic fistula // The Surgeon. 2011. № 4
(9). C. 211–217.
48. Hancock J. T., Khoshgoftaar T. M. CatBoost for big data: an interdisciplinary review // Journal of
Big Data. 2020. № 1 (7). C. 94–101.
49. Hank T. [et al.]. Association Between Pancreatic Fistula and Long-term Survival in the Era of
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy // JAMA Surgery. 2019. № 10 (154). C. 943–949.
50. Hastie T., Tibshirani R. F. J. The Elements of Statistical Learning. // Springer. 2009. C. 745–750.
51. Hayashibe A., Ogino N. Clinical study for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy with mesh
reinforcement // Asian Journal of Surgery. 2018. № 3 (41). C. 236–240.
52. Hilst J. van [et al.]. Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal
Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA) // Annals of Surgery. 2019. № 1 (269). C. 10–17.
53. Isaji S. [et al.]. International consensus on definition and criteria of borderline resectable pancreatic
ductal adenocarcinoma 2017 // Pancreatology. 2018. № 1 (18). C. 2–11.
54. Ishikawa O. Concomitant Benefit of Preoperative Irradiation in Preventing Pancreas Fistula
Formation After Pancreatoduodenectomy // Archives of Surgery. 1991. № 7 (126). C. 885–891.
55. Karpoff H. M. Results of Total Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas // Archives of
Surgery. 2001. № 1 (136). C. 44–51.
56. Kawai M., Tani M., Yamaue H. Transection using bipolar scissors reduces pancreatic fistula after
distal pancreatectomy // Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. 2008. № 4 (15). C. 366–372.
115
57. Kazanjian K. K. Management of Pancreatic Fistulas After Pancreaticoduodenectomy // Archives of
Surgery. 2005. № 9 (140). C. 849.
58. Kleeff J. [et al.]. Distal Pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases //
Annals of Surgery. 2007. № 4 (245). C. 573–582.
59. Knaebel H. P. [et al.]. Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic
remnant after distal pancreatectomy // British Journal of Surgery. 2005. № 5 (92). C. 539–546.
60. Kohavi R. A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
// Intl. Jnt. Conf. AI. 1995. № 2 (14). C. 1137–1145.
61. Kohler E. [et al.]. Effect of a New Somatostatin Analogue on Pancreatic Function in Healthy
Volunteers // Pancreas. 1986. № 2 (1). C. 154–159.
62. Korneenkov A. A., Ryazantsev S. V., Vyazemskaya E. E. Symptom dynamics assessment of the
disease by methods of survival analysis // Medical Council. 2019. № 20. C. 45–51.
63. Lai M. [et al.]. Fibrin sealants for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following
pancreatic surgery // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2023. № 6 (2023).
64. Lillemoe K. D. [et al.]. Distal Pancreatectomy: Indications and Outcomes in 235 Patients // Annals
of Surgery. 1999. № 5 (229). C. 693–701.
65. Lillemoe K. D. [et al.]. Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after
pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial // Journal of Gastrointestinal
Surgery. 2004. № 7 (8). C. 766–774.
66. Lin J. W. [et al.]. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous
fistula // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2004. № 8 (8). C. 951–959.
67. Loos M. [et al.]. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: Microbial growth determines outcome // Surgery.
2018. № 6 (164). C. 1185–1190.
68. Lowy A. M. [et al.]. Prospective, Randomized Trial of Octreotide to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula After
Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Malignant Disease // Annals of Surgery. 1997. № 5 (226). C. 632–641.
69. Lucas A. L. [et al.]. Global Trends in Pancreatic Cancer Mortality From 1980 Through 2013 and
Predictions for 2017 // Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2016. № 10 (14). C. 1452–1462.
70. Maehira H. [et al.]. Computed Tomography Enhancement Pattern of the Pancreatic Parenchyma
Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy // Pancreas. 2019. № 2 (48).
C. 209–215.
71. Malgras B. [et al.]. Management of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
// Journal of visceral surgery. 2023. № 1 (160). C. 39–51.
72. Marczell A. P., Stierer M. Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple Procedure) for Pancreatic
Malignancy: Occlusion of a Non-Anastomosed Pancreatic Stump With Fibrin Sealant // HPB Surgery.
1992. № 4 (5). C. 251–260.
116
73. Martin I., Au K. Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of anastomotic leak after a
pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial // HPB. 2013. № 8 (15). C. 561–
566.
74. Matsuda Y. [et al.]. Encapsulating fibrosis following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is correlated with
outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer // PLOS ONE. 2019. № 9 (14). C. 116–201.
75. Miller B. C. [et al.]. A Multi-Institutional External Validation of the Fistula Risk Score for
Pancreatoduodenectomy // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2014. № 1 (18). C. 172–180.
76. Mohammed R., Rawashdeh J., Abdullah M. Machine Learning with Oversampling and
Undersampling Techniques: Overview Study and Experimental Results IEEE, 2020.C. 243–248.
77. Mumby P. J. Statistical power of non-parametric tests: A quick guide for designing sampling
strategies // Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2002. № 1 (44). C. 85–87.
78. Muschelli J. ROC and AUC with a Binary Predictor: a Potentially Misleading Metric // Journal of
Classification. 2020. № 3 (37). C. 696–708.
79. Nakeeb A. El [et al.]. Prognostic factors affecting survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for
pancreatic adenocarcinoma (single center experience). // Hepato-gastroenterology. 2014. № 133 (61).
C. 1426–38.
80. Nakeeb A. El [et al.]. Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy
after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study // HPB. 2014. № 8 (16). C. 713–722.
81. Nakeeb A. El [et al.]. Predictors of long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for peri-
ampullary adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study of 5-year survivors // Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic
Diseases International. 2018. № 5 (17). C. 443–449.
82. Nassour I. [et al.]. Novel Calculator to Estimate the Risk of Clinically Relevant Postoperative
Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2022. № 7
(26). C. 1436–1444.
83. Nohara Y. [et al.]. Explanation of machine learning models using shapley additive explanation and
application for real data in hospital // Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2022. (214). C.
577–584.
84. Okabayashi T. [et al.]. Clinicopathological features and medical management of intraductal papillary
mucinous neoplasms // Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2006. № 2 (21). C. 462–467.
85. Oneil Machado N. Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatectomy: Definitions, Risk Factors, Preventive
Measures, and Management—Review // International Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2012. (2012). C.
1–10.
86. Pande R. [et al.]. External validation of postoperative pancreatic fistula prediction scores in
pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. // HPB : the official journal of the
International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. 2022. № 3 (24). C. 287–298.
117
87. Peng S. [et al.]. Binding pancreaticojejunostomy is a new technique to minimize leakage // The
American Journal of Surgery. 2002. № 3 (183). C. 283–285.
88. Peng Y.-P. [et al.]. Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients after distal
pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Scientific Reports. 2017. № 1 (7). C. 185–
191.
89. Peters N. A. [et al.]. Modified Appleby Procedure for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Does Improved
Neoadjuvant Therapy Warrant Such an Aggressive Approach? // Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2016. №
11 (23). C. 3757–3764.
90. Petrosyan L., Yeung D. Shapley value for differential network games: Theory and application //
Journal of Dynamics & Games. 2021. № 2 (8). C. 151–160.
91. Poon R. T. P. [et al.]. External Drainage of Pancreatic Duct With a Stent to Reduce Leakage Rate of
Pancreaticojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy // Annals of Surgery. 2007. № 3 (246). C. 425–
435.
92. Pugalenthi A. [et al.]. Postoperative complications and overall survival after
pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma // Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2016.
№ 2 (113). C. 188–193.
93. Rajarathinam G. [et al.]. Post pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage: outcome prediction based on
new ISGPS Clinical severity grading // HPB. 2008. № 5 (10). C. 363–370.
94. Rajkomar A., Dean J., Kohane I. Machine Learning in Medicine // New England Journal of
Medicine. 2019. № 14 (380). C. 1347–1358.
95. Ramacciato G. [et al.]. Risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a collective
review. // The American surgeon. 2011. № 3 (77). C. 257–69.
96. Rigatti S. J. Random Forest // Journal of Insurance Medicine. 2017. № 1 (47). C. 31–39.
97. Rodríguez-Pérez R., Bajorath J. Interpretation of machine learning models using shapley values:
application to compound potency and multi-target activity predictions // Journal of Computer-Aided
Molecular Design. 2020. № 10 (34). C. 1013–1026.
98. Schuh F. [et al.]. A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative
Pancreatic Fistula: A classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. // Annals of
surgery. 2023. № 3 (277). C. 597–608.
99. Serrano P. E. [et al.]. Effect of Pancreatic Fistula on Recurrence and Long-Term Prognosis of
Periampullary Adenocarcinomas after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. // The American surgeon. 2016. № 12
(82). C. 1187–1195.
100. Shah M. H. [et al.]. Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice
Guidelines in Oncology // Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2021. № 7 (19). C.
839–868.
118
101. Sikora S. S., Posner M. C. Management of the pancreatic stump following
pancreaticoduodenectomy // British Journal of Surgery. 2005. № 12 (82). C. 1590–1597.
102. Smyrniotis V. [et al.]. Does internal stenting of the pancreaticojejunostomy improve outcomes after
pancreatoduodenectomy? A prospective study // Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery. 2010. № 3 (395).
C. 195–200.
103. Sohn T. A. [et al.]. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—616 patients: results, outcomes, and
prognostic indicators // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2000. № 6 (4). C. 567–579.
104. Sugimoto M. [et al.]. Pancreatic perfusion data and post-pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes //
Journal of Surgical Research. 2015. № 2 (194). C. 441–449.
105. Tempero M. A. [et al.]. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice
Guidelines in Oncology // Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2021. № 4 (19). C.
439–457.
106. Tilak M., Tewari M., Shukla H. S. Octreotide and postoperative pancreatic fistula after
pancreaticoduodenectomy: What we know so far? A narrative review. // Indian journal of cancer. 2023.
№ 2 (60). C. 152–159.
107. Trudeau M. T. [et al.]. The Fistula Risk Score Catalog: Toward Precision Medicine for Pancreatic
Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy. // Annals of surgery. 2022. № 2 (275). C. 463–472.
108. Uchida Y. [et al.]. Postoperative pancreatic fistulas decrease the survival of pancreatic cancer
patients treated with surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A retrospective analysis // Surgical
Oncology. 2020. (35). C. 527–532.
109. Vallance A. E. [et al.]. Calculating the risk of a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy:
a systematic review // HPB. 2015. № 11 (17). C. 1040–1048.
110. Veena Kumari H. M., Dr. Suresh D. S., Dr. Dhananjaya P. E. Clinical Dengue Data Analysis and
Prediction using Multiple Classifiers: An Ensemble Techniques // Global Journal of Computer Science
and Technology. 2022. C. 37–51.
111. Villodre C. [et al.]. Textbook outcome in distal pancreatectomy: A multicenter study // Surgery.
2024. № 4 (175). C. 1134–1139.
112. Viloria A., Pineda Lezama O. B., Mercado-Caruzo N. Unbalanced data processing using
oversampling: Machine Learning // Procedia Computer Science. 2020. (175). C. 108–113.
113. Wang H. [et al.]. Analysis of prognostic factors for hyperamylasemia following
pancreaticoduodenectomy // Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]. 2019. № 7 (57). C.
534–539.
114. Wang X. [et al.]. Short‐term outcomes and risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreatic
enucleation: A single‐center experience of 142 patients // Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2018. № 2
(117). C. 182–190.
119
115. Watanabe Y. [et al.]. Effect of postoperative major complications on prognosis after
pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a retrospective review // Surgery Today. 2017. № 5 (47). C. 555–
567.
116. Xu J. [et al.]. Strategies for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: What really
matters? // Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International. 2018. № 1 (17). C. 22–26.
117. Yang D.-J. [et al.]. The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy
for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Scientific Reports. 2019.
№ 1 (9). C. 1159.
118. Yang F. [et al.]. Drain Contamination after Distal Pancreatectomy: Incidence, Risk Factors, and
Association with Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2019. № 12
(23). C. 2449–2458.
119. Yang F., Windsor J. A., Fu D.-L. Optimizing prediction models for pancreatic fistula after
pancreatectomy: Current status and future perspectives // World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2024. №
10 (30). C. 1329–1345.
120. Yeo C. J. [et al.]. Does Prophylactic Octreotide Decrease the Rates of Pancreatic Fistula and Other
Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy? // Annals of Surgery. 2000. № 3 (232). C. 419–429.
121. Yu L. [et al.]. Risk factors of postoperative complications of pancreatoduodenectomy. // Hepato-
gastroenterology. 2014. № 135 (61). C. 2091–5.
122. Zarzavadjian Le Bian A. [et al.]. Predicting the Severity of Pancreatic Fistula after
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overweight and Blood Loss as Independent Risk Factors: Retrospective
Analysis of 277 Patients // Surgical Infections. 2019. № 6 (20). C. 486–491.
123. Zhang H. [et al.]. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic
remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy // British Journal of Surgery. 2014. № 1 (102). C. 4–
15.
124. Zhou M. [et al.]. Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in gastric cancer patients:
A systematic review and meta-analysis. // European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the
European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2023. № 11
(49). C. 107092.
125. Zhou Y. [et al.]. Internal pancreatic duct stent does not decrease pancreatic fistula rate after
pancreatic resection: a meta-analysis // The American Journal of Surgery. 2013. № 6 (205). C. 718–725.
126. Zhou Y. [et al.]. Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on
occurrences of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy // Asian Journal of
Surgery. 2015. № 3 (38). C. 155–160.
127. Zhou Y. [et al.]. A systematic review of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for
adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas // HPB. 2017. № 1 (19). C. 10–15.
120
128. Zhou Y. [et al.]. Rising BMI Is Associated with Increased Rate of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic
Fistula after Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. // The American surgeon. 2019. №
12 (85). C. 1376–1380.
129. Zou X. [et al.]. Logistic Regression Model Optimization and Case Analysis IEEE, 2019.C. 135–
139.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана