Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5447_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
10.10.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
☆
245
The physicochemical properties of liposomes and rigidity vary with the bilayer
components and phospholipids used [20]. For instance, unsaturated phospholipids,
such as soybean phosphatidylcholine, form permeable liposomes and less stable
bilayer, whereas unsaturated phospholipids with long acyl chains, such as dipalmi-
toylphosphatidylcholine, form liposomes that are rigid and impermeable.
Phospholipids are esters of fatty acids, phosphoric acids, glycerol, and other
alcohols, for example, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphati-
dylinositol, and phosphatidylserine. These all consist of fatty acids and esters at one
or two positions of the glycerol molecule with phosphate group esteried at
positionthree.
The rst-generation liposomes, composed of phospholipids and cholesterol,
could reduce toxicity and improve therapeutic index of entrapped drug. However,
these liposomes were prone to rapid engulfment by reticuloendothelial system
(RES). In order to circumvent this issue, stealth liposomes are designed by coating
liposome with polyethylene glycol, i.e., PEGylated liposomes. PEGylated lipo-
somes have increased circulation time and increased stability of drug by non-
engulfment [21], thus maximizing bioavailability of drug.
A variety of therapeutic agents can be loaded in liposomes, such as anticancer
drugs, biologicals, and antimicrobials. The hydrophilic molecules are typically
loaded into the aqueous core, while lipophilic substances are loaded in the bilayer
membrane of liposome [22]. The payload can also be physically or covalently
attached to the surface of liposomes. Table.14.4 represents some of the examples of
commercially available liposomal products for drug delivery.
Niosomes
Niosomes are lamellar structures (nonionic surfactant vesicles) formed by com-
bination of nonionic surfactant with cholesterol [23]. Niosomes are similar to lipo-
somes in terms of morphology; however, instead of phospholipids, nonionic
surfactant is used in niosomes. Consequently, the physicochemical properties of
niosomes differ from that of liposomes, as summarized in Table14.5.
The major components of niosomes are nonionic surfactant and cholesterol; sur-
factant is responsible for formation of lamellar structure, while cholesterol provides
rigidity and stability to the shape of niosome. The nature of surfactants inuences
encapsulation efciency, toxicity, and stability of niosomes. Nonionic surfactants of
the Span® series and Tween® series are generally used for the preparation of nio-
somes [24]. The properties of niosomes, such as size, surface charge, lamellarity,
and trapped volume, can be varied by changing the composition. For instance,
incorporation of dicetyl phosphate, phosphatidic acid etc., in the membrane can
impart negative charge, while stearylamine, cetylpyridinium chloride, etc. can form
positively charged niosomes [24]. The surfactant/lipid and surfactant/water ratios
are critical considerations for formulation designing, since encapsulation efciency
of niosomes is greatly affected by these parameters [25]. A surfactant/lipid ratio of
1/2.5 w/w is typically used for formation of stable niosomes.
14 Novel Drug Delivery Systems
https://t.me/medicina_free
246
14.3.2 Inorganic Nanoparticles
A variety of inorganic materials have been investigated for biomedical applications.
For some of the inorganic materials, e.g., gold, silver, iron oxide, quantum dots, etc.,
nanonization imparts unique electronic properties compared to their parent bulk
material. These properties have been extensively exploited for diagnosis and thera-
peutic purposes.
Gold nanoparticles and iron oxide nanoparticles are two examples of inorganic
nanoparticles that have a long history of use in biomedical eld. Therefore, these
nanoparticles will be explained in detail in the coming section.
14.3.2.1 Gold Nanoparticles
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have centuries-old history in chemistry and biological
sciences [26]. The experiment proposed by Michael Faraday, around 150years ago,
has been considered a baseline for the modern era of AuNP synthesis. Moreover, in
1971, the British researchers Faulk and Taylor [27] developed antibody conjugation
of salmonella antigen with colloidal gold surface coating for direct electron micros-
copy visualization. Since then, the use of colloidal gold has been greatly increased
in different scientic domains such as chemistry, biology, engineering, and
Table 14.4 Examples of liposomal products available for clinical applications
Brand name Drug Indication
Ambisome™ Amphotericin B Fungal infection
DaunoXome™ Daunorubicin Kaposi’s sarcoma
Doxil™ Doxorubicin Ovarian cancer, AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma, multiple
myeloma
Visudyne® Verteporn Age-related macular degeneration, pathologic myopia, and
ocular histoplasmosis
Myocet® Doxorubicin Recurrent breast cancer
DepoCyt® Cytarabine Neoplastic meningitis and lymphomatous meningitis
Lipoplatin® Cisplatin Epithelial malignancies
DepoDur® Morphine
sulfate
Postoperative pain following major surgery
Table 14.5 Some of the differences between niosomes and liposomes
Niosomes Liposomes
– Primarily composed of nonionic
single-chain surfactant and cholesterol
– Prepared from neutral or charged double-chain
phospholipids
– Economical and stable compared to
liposomes
– Phospholipids are expensive and chemically
unstable. Therefore, liposomes require special storage
condition
S. A. Khan and H. Ali
https://t.me/medicina_free
247
medicines. Lately, AuNP has been applied to a variety of medical applications, for
example, gene delivery, radiation therapy,and diagnosis, etc.
The presence of plasmon absorbance bands and their shape- and size-dependent
properties make gold NPs a versatile material for diverse applications in many elds
(as summarized in Table14.6).
For biomedical applications, Aurasol® was the rst product based on AuNPs
that was developed for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. However, it is no
more used. The antiangiogenic property of AuNPs was later exploited for the devel-
opment of Aurimune® that has recently completed phase 1 trials and has shown
good tolerability and tumor deposition. The paclitaxel-loaded Aurimune® platform
is under preclinical development stage. However, the only AuNP-based product
approved for tumor elimination to date is AuroLase® that uses silica nanoparticles
coated with gold nanoparticles.
14.3.2.2 Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (IONPs)
For the past 90years, materials such as iron oxides, iron hydroxide, or their combi-
nation have been extensively used in biomedical eld due to their unique properties,
such as magnetic properties, superparamagnetic properties, and biodegradability.
IONPs have been used in iron replacement therapy, magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI), biosensors, targeted drug delivery, and cell separation [29].
When the size of iron oxide materials is reduced to nanometer range, it exhibits
superparamagnetic properties. These particles are referred to as superparamagnetic
iron oxide NPs (SPIONs) [30]. In this connection maghemite (γ-Fe
2
O
3
), hematite,
(α-Fe
2
O
3
) and magnetite (Fe
3
O
4
) have proven experimentally to be highly magnetiz-
able when external magnetic eld is applied. However, SPIONs tend to agglomerate
in magnetic eld; therefore, effective surface stabilization is required. Typically,
fatty acids, PEG, poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone), dextran, chitosan, etc. are used as coat-
ing agents [31].
The early parenteral formulation of colloidal iron oxide for anemia was stabi-
lized with dextran. However, due to rapid release of elemental iron, the formulation
raised toxicity concerns [32]. Therefore, thick coating with carbohydrate was intro-
duced to mitigate the rapid release of elemental iron in the circulation, e.g., Imferon®
(Fisons) or Dexferrum®. Later on, low molecular weight dextran, sucrose,
Table 14.6 Application of AuNPs on the basis of their properties, adopted from [28]
Properties Major eld of application
Redox activity Electrochemical sensing and electronic
devices
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) Imaging and sensing
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) Colorimetric analysis and photothermal
therapy
Fluorescence quenching Sensing and material fabrication
14
Novel Drug Delivery Systems
https://t.me/medicina_free
248
gluconate, etc. were introduced for stabilization of iron oxide formulations, and
consequently, the products were less toxic and exhibited little immunogenic reac-
tion [33].
Modern intravenous iron formulations are iron oxide/hydroxide nanoparticles
stabilized with carbohydrates [34]. A variety of iron oxide-based formulation are
available for treatment of anemia, such as Ferinject® and Injectafer®, containing
ferric carboxymaltose, which is commercialized by Vifor Pharma and Daiichi
Sankyo. Other examples are Venofer® containing iron-sucrose complex manufac-
tured by Vifor Pharma, Monofer® containing iron isomaltoside marketed by
Pharmacosmos in Europe, and Feraheme®/Rienso® containing ferumoxytol as
SPIONs, manufactured by AMAG Pharmaceuticals.
Additionally, SPIONs have been used as contrast agent for MRI.For example,
Feridex® and Endorem® containing ironoxide stabilized with dextran are used for
imaging of liver and spleen lesions. Other examples include Resovist® and
Cliavist® containing ferucarbotran with carboxydextran, marketed by Bayer
Healthcare, used for imaging of liver lesions. Additionally, Ferrotran®, previously
knowns as Combidex based on Ferumoxtran-10, is the only MRI contrast agent that
can detect lymph node metastases as small as 2mm [35].
Besides being used as a diagnostic agent, SPIONs have also recommended for
hyperthermia treatment of cancer. Since SPIONs have high magnetic saturation,
therefore it is also employed in the target site to damage cells locally by increasing
temperature. Based on the aforementioned principles, a new product is introduced
into the market known as NanoTherm® (MagForce), which is also available in
Europe since 2018. These tiny magnetic nanoparticles are introduced either locally
into tumor, which is then heated by external magnetic eld, named as NanoActivator®,
which destroys the cancer cells.
References
1. Heng, P.W., Controlled release drug delivery systems. Pharmaceutical Development and
Technology, 2018. 23(9): p.833-833.
2. Kang, H., et al., Size-dependent EPR effect of polymeric nanoparticles on tumor targeting.
Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2020. 9(1): p.1901223.
3. Cabral, H., et al., Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable
tumours depends on size. Nature Nanotechnology, 2011. 6(12): p.815-823.
4. Maeda, H., The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the
key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. Advances in Enzyme Regulation,
2001. 41(1): p.189-207.
5. Dreher, M.R., et al., Tumor Vascular Permeability, Accumulation, and Penetration of
Macromolecular Drug Carriers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006. 98(5):
p.335-344.
6. Chauhan, V.P., etal., Fluorescent Nanorods and Nanospheres for Real-Time In Vivo Probing
of Nanoparticle Shape-Dependent Tumor Penetration. Angewandte Chemie International
Edition, 2011. 50(48): p.11417-11420.
S. A. Khan and H. Ali
https://t.me/medicina_free
249
7. Danhier, F., Feron, O and Préat, V.To exploit the tumor microenvironment: passive and active
tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release,
2010. 148(2): p.135-146.
8. Bertrand, N., etal., Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the
era of modern cancer biology. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2014. 66: p.2-25.
9. ETPN– Nanomedicine European Technology Platform. Src, Ncpm, Ncrd. Strategic agenda for
EuroNanoMed. (accessed 28 March 2022)
https://etp- nanomedicine.eu/about- nanomedicine/
strategic-
research- and- innovation- agenda/.
10. Global Markets for Nanoparticle Size Analysis Instrumentation in the Life Sciences. (accessed
28 March 2022). https://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/biotechnology/nanoparticle-
size- analysis-instrumentation-life-sciences-report.html
11. Viswanathan, P., Muralidaran, Y and Ragavan, G. (2017). Challenges in oral drug delivery: a
nano-based strategy to overcome, In: Andronescu, E, Grumezescu, A., (Eds) Nanostructures
for oral medicine. 2017, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands: p.173–201.
12. Chavda, V.P., (2019). Nanobased nano drug delivery: a comprehensive review. In: Applications
of Targeted Nano-Drugs and Delivery Systems: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in Drug
Delivery, Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, Netherlands: p.69-92.
13. Newton, A.M.J and Kaur, S, (2019), Solid lipid nanoparticles for skin and drug delivery:
Methods of preparation and characterization techniques and applications. In: Grumezescu,
AM., Nanoarchitectonics in Biomedicine. 2019, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands:
p.295-334.
14. Pund, S. and Joshi, A., Nanoarchitectures for neglected tropical protozoal diseases: challenges
and state of the art, in Nano-and Microscale Drug Delivery Systems. 2017, Elsevier,Amsterdam,
Netherlands: p.439-480.
15. Saini, J.K. and Kumar, S.Development of nanocrystal formulation with improved dissolution.
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 2018. 8(5): p.118-129.
16. Mohammad, I.S., et al., Drug nanocrystals: fabrication methods and promising therapeutic
applications. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2019. 562: p.187-202.
17. Teymouri Rad, R., et al., Enhanced Dissolution Rate of Tadalal Nanoparticles Prepared
by Sonoprecipitation Technique: Optimization and Physicochemical Investigation. Iranian
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2017. 16(4): p.1335-1348.
18. Birrenbach, G. and Speiser, P.P., Polymerized micelles and their use as adjuvants in immunol-
ogy. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1976. 65(12): p.1763-6.
19. Sharma, V.K. and Agrawal, M.K.A historical perspective of liposomes-a bio nanomaterial.
Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021. 45: p.2963-2966.
20. Roy, B., et al., Inuence of lipid composition, pH, and temperature on physicochemical
properties of liposomes with curcumin as model drug. Journal of oleo Science, 2016. 65(5):
p.399-411.
21. Mohamed, M., etal., PEGylated liposomes: immunological responses. Science and Technology
of Advanced Materials, 2019. 20(1): p.710-724.
22. Alavi, M., Karimi, N and Safaei, M., Application of various types of liposomes in drug deliv-
ery systems. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 2017. 7(1): p.3.
23. Shah, A., et al., Advanced development of a non-ionic surfactant and cholesterol material
based niosomal gel formulation for the topical delivery of anti-acne drugs. Materials Advances,
2020. 1(6): p.1763-1774.
24. Ge, X., etal., Advances of non-ionic surfactant vesicles (niosomes) and their application in
drug delivery. Pharmaceutics, 2019. 11(2): p.55.
25. Abdelkader, H., Alani, A.W.G and Alany, R.G.Recent advances in non-ionic surfactant ves-
icles (niosomes): self-assembly, fabrication, characterization, drug delivery applications and
limitations. Drug delivery, 2014. 21(2): p.87-100.
26. Dykman, L. and Khlebtsov, N.Gold nanoparticles in biology and medicine: recent advances
and prospects. Acta Naturae, 2011. 3(2 (9)).
14
Novel Drug Delivery Systems
https://t.me/medicina_free
250
27. Faulk, W.P. and Taylor,G.M.Communication to the editors: an immunocolloid method for the
electron microscope. Immunochemistry, 1971. 8(11): p.1081-1083.
28. Yeh, Y.-C., Creran, B and Rotello, V.M., Gold nanoparticles: preparation, properties, and
applications in bionanotechnology. Nanoscale, 2012. 4(6): p.1871-1880.
29. Arias, L.S., etal., Iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications: a perspective on syn-
thesis, drugs, antimicrobial activity, and toxicity. Antibiotics, 2018. 7(2): p.46.
30. Shari, S., etal., Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for invivo molecular and cel-
lular imaging. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging, 2015. 10(5): p.329-355.
31. Sodipo, B.K. and Aziz, A.A., Recent advances in synthesis and surface modication of
superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with silica. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic
Materials, 2016. 416: p.275-291.
32. Goetsch, A.T., Moore, C.V., and Minnich, V. observations on the effect of massive doses of
iron given intravenously to patients with hypochromic anemia. Blood, 1946. 1(2): p.129-142.
33. Jahn, M.R., etal., A comparative study of the physicochemical properties of iron isomalto-
side 1000 (Monofer®), a new intravenous iron preparation and its clinical implications.
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 2011. 78(3): p.480-491.
34. Schaefer, B., etal., Intravenous iron supplementation therapy. Molecular Aspects of Medicine,
2020. 75: p.100862.
35. Bisso, S. and Leroux,J.-C., Nanopharmaceuticals: A focus on their clinical translatability.
International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2020. 578: p.119098.
S. A. Khan and H. Ali
https://t.me/medicina_free
251© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
S. A. Khan (ed.), Essentials of Industrial Pharmacy, AAPS Advances in the
Pharmaceutical Sciences Series 46, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84977-1_15
Chapter 15
Polymer forBiomedical Applications
IqraRiasat, MuhammadNaeem, MuhammadUmarAslamKhan,
SyedBabarJamal, AtifAliKhanKhalil, SajjadHaider, andAdnanHaider
Abstract The structureof a polymer depends entirely on itsmonomer. Polymersare
broadly classied into two main groups, natural and synthetic, depending on the
source from which they are derived. Polymershave made a name for themselvesin
all areasof science and especiallyin the biomedical eld due to their wide range of
applications. Among the numerous polymers, biopolymershave attracted the atten-
tion of the scientic community mainlybecause of their biocompatible and biode-
gradable properties. In this chapter, we have summarized information about
polymers, their classication, and last but not least, their potential biomedical appli-
cations. This will help students to understand the basic concepts related to polymers
and especiallybiopolymers and their potential applicationin the biomedical eld.
Keywords Polymeric scaffolds · Biocomposite · Biodegradable · Biocompatible
I. Riasat
Department of Bioinformatics and Biosciences, Capital University of Science and
Technology (CUST), Islamabad, Pakistan
M. Naeem · S. B. Jamal · A. A. K. Khalil · A. Haider (
*)
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi,
Pakistan
M. U. A. Khan
Department of Polymer Engineering and Technology, University of the Punjab, Lahore,
Pakistan
S. Haider (
*)
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University,
PO-BOX 800, Riyadh, 11421, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: shaider@ksu.edu.sa
https://t.me/medicina_free
252
15.1 Introduction
A polymer is a large molecule made up of small repeating units, called mono-
mers.Monomers are formed into a large molecule by a process called polymeriza-
tion. Polymers (synthetic and natural)have a positive impact on daily lifedue to
their numerous applications in various elds. Thecentral role of polymersis evident
in from the fact thateverything from plastics to proteins and nucleic acids are com-
prised of these natural and synthetic polymers. Polymerization is the process by
which small repeating units are combined/linked in such a way that they stack up
and form long-chain structures called polymers [1].Due to their unique physical
and chemical properties (tensile strength, viscoelasticity, biocompatibility, biode-
gradability, ease of moulding), they areused in almost all elds of science [2, 3].
The word “polymer” is derived from the Greek words polus (means “many) and
meros (means “part”), referring to molecules containing repeating units. Thus, a
polymer is dened as a large molecule made up of small repeating units, called
monomers, by a process called polymerization [1]. Jöns Jacob Berzelius in 1833
used the termalthough his denition was different from the IUPAC system. It was
Hermann Staudinger in 1920 who from his ndings proposed that polymers are
covalently bonded macromolecules [4]. Recently, however, researchershave been
exploringnon-covalently bonded supramolecular polymers [5, 6].
The number of monomers, types of monomers, and their orientation in a polymer
structure may vary from polymer to polymer. The properties of polymer can be
tailored by the polymerization process. The simplest polymer is formed by bonding
just the same type of monomer, and the polymer is called homopolymer. Similarly,
when different types of monomers are combined, the resultant polymer is calledhet-
ero and copolymer. Copolymers can vary in structure, composition, and the mono-
mer ratio, which ultimately dene the chemical and physical properties of the
copolymer. The interlinking of polymer chainsmolecules to one another is called
cross-linking, for instance, rubber bands and polyethylene bags.
15.2 Classication ofPolymers
There are different types of polymer classications. For instance, in 1929 Carothers
classied polymers on the basis of structure: addition polymers and condensation
polymer [7]. In another classication, polymers are simply categorized as linear
polymers, branched polymers, or cross-linked polymers (Fig.15.1).
In the context of this chapter, classication of polymer on the basis of degrad-
ability will be more relevant: biodegradable polymers and nonbiodegradable poly-
mers. However, here the focus is primarily on biodegradable polymers, since these
polymers have more applications in drug delivery.
I. Riasat etal.
https://t.me/medicina_free
253
15.2.1 Biodegradable Polymers
Previously nonbiodegradable polymers were more common in the biomedical eld.
However, the problem with such polymers was that they would remain in the body
forever and would need surgical removal after the desired therapeutic objective is
achieved. This was the reason thatscientists started focusing on biodegradable poly-
mers, which when introduced to the bodyare degraded (by hydrolysis, enzymatic
degradation, or combination of both).
Another critical property of polymers for biomedical use is biocompatibility. The
polymer itself or its metabolites must not have toxic effects on the body [7].
Polymers for biomedical application are further classied on the basis of their
origin; they are of two types: natural polymers and synthetic polymers.
15.2.1.1
Natural Biodegradable Polymers
Polymers that have a natural origin are known as the natural polymers. These poly-
mers are obtained from plants, animals, or microorganisms and are also called bio-
polymers. These polymers include proteins, polynucleotides, and polysaccharides
[5, 6]. Biopolymers received a lot of attention because of their benecial properties
such as biodegradability, lack of toxicity, availability, low cost, and, most impor-
tantly, biocompatibility.
Biopolymers have wide range of applications in various elds and more speci-
cally in the pharmaceutical industry [8]. In the pharmaceutical industry, biopoly-
mers are used as coating, gelling, emulsifying agents,binder,and disintegrantsin
capsule and tablet formulation.
Some of the common biopolymers are summarized in Table15.1. One of the
most abundant natural polymers is cellulose, which is obtained from plants and
Fig. 15.1 Representation of polymer types based on the linkage of monomers, linear polymer,
branched polymer, and cross-linked polymers
15
Polymer forBiomedical Applications
https://t.me/medicina_free
254
mostly used in the laboratories for the fabrication of bers, clothes, cosmetics,
paper, pharmaceutical formulations, etc. Some of the semisynthetic forms of cellu-
lose are also prepared in laboratories that include cellulose ethers and cellulose
esters, which like the pristine cellulose have found application in preparation of
llers, binders, compressibility enhancers, and gelling agents [2, 9].
However, biopolymers show relatively higher susceptibility toward microbial
contamination when they are exposed to the external environment [10–13].
Moreover, it is difcult to purify polymers once it gets contaminated with impurities
during extraction [11].
15.2.1.2 Synthetic Biodegradable Polymers
Synthetic polymers are man-made and are considereda relatively new class of poly-
mers,having been introduced only in the early twentieth century. These polymers
are synthesized in the laboratorythroughchemical reactions thatallowsthe fabrica-
tion of a wide variety of polymers [7, 14].
Biocompatible synthetic polymers offer a wide range of applications in the bio-
medical eld,such as drug delivery, hemodialysis, tissue engineering, etc. Polymers
with the ability to respond to certain internal or external stimuli, such as tempera-
ture, pH, and ionic strength, can be used in stimulus-responsive drug delivery sys-
tems [15].
Synthetic biodegradable polymers typically have unstable bond links in the
backbone, usuallya carbonyl bond attached to an oxygen, nitrogen, or sulfur atom
(Fig.15.2). Depending on the attached functional groups, a wide range of polymers
have been synthesized that have shown potentialfor application in the biomedical
eld [16]. Some of the common classes of synthetic biodegradable polymers are
given as follows.
Polyesters The commonly used polymers included polylactic acid (PLA) and
polyglycolic acid (PGA) (structure shown in Fig.15.3). These polymers were ini-
tially used for absorbable sutures.
PLA isan optically activebiodegradablepolymer that can be synthesized in the
laboratory and derived from plant starch, corn, cassava, maize, sugarcane or
Table 15.1 Representation of natural polymers based on their origin
Origin of natural
polymers Polymers
Animal Gelatin, hyaluronan, chitin
Plant Cellulose, starch, hemicellulose, agar, pectin, guar gum, psyllium, gum
acacia, lignin
Microbe Xanthan, gellan, hyaluronan, curdlan
Algae Carrageenan, alginate, agar
Fungus Schizophyllan, cardlan, scleroglucan, pullulan, chitin
I. Riasat etal.
https://t.me/medicina_free