Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3860_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
24 S. I. Wahl and K. M. Zinn
https://t.me/med1917
iodinated agents, and it can cause discomfort during injection in a substantial minority of patients, interfering with study completion and adequacy.
15
CO2femoral arte­riography may result in an incomplete distal study in up to 50 to 75% of patients.
16,17
Because of the limitations of CO2as an alternative to iodinated contrast, interest has centered on utilizing gad­olinium based agents (e.g., gadodiamide) for angiogra­phy. Gadodiamide has been used alone or in conjunction with conventional contrast or CO
for studies of the pe-
2
ripheral and renal arteries and the inferior vena cava. It appears to be equivalent to dilute iodinated contrast in its attenuation properties and may decrease the incidence of renal failure in at-risk patients.
18–21
■ Conclusion
An understanding of the basic concepts of anatomy, physiology filming, and injection technique is key to ob­taining a good diagnostic angiogram. Evolving digital technology has enabled the acquisition of diagnostic studies quickly and safely. Modification of standard tech­niques, judiciously applied, will serve to benefit patients and enhance the quality of the study.
REFERENCES
1. Cohen MI, Vogelzang RI. A comparison of techniques for improved visualization of the arteries of the distal lower extremity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:1021–1024.
2. Crummy AB, Strother CM, Lieberman RP, et al. Digital video sub­traction angiography for evaluation of peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 1981;141:33–37.
3. Crummy AB, Steighorst MF, Turski PA, et al. Digital subtraction angiography: current status and use of intra-arterial injection. Radi- ology 1982;145:303–307.
4. Katzen BT. Current status of digital angiography in vascular imag­ing. Radio Clin North Am 1995;33:1–14.
5. Kadir S. Diagnostic Angiography. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1986.
6. Katayama H, et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast
media: a report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990;175:621–628.
7. Lasser EC, et al. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reac­tions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med 1987;317: 845–849.
8. Lasser EC, Berry CC, Mishkin MM, et al. Pretreatment with corte­costeroids to prevent adverse reactions to nonionic contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:523–526.
9. Lautin EM, Freeman NJ, Schoenfeld AH, et al. Radiocontrast-asso­ciated renal dysfunction: incidence and risk factors. AJR Am R Roentgenol 1991;157:49–58.
10. Cruz C, Hricak H, Samhouri F, et al. Contrast media for angiogra­phy: effect on renal function. Radiology 1986;158:109–112.
11. Barrett BJ, Carlisle EJ. Metaanalysis of the relative nephrotoxicity of high-osmolality and low-osmolality iodinated contrast media. Radi- ology 1993;188:171–178.
12. Bettman MA. The evaluation of contrast-related renal failure. Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:66–68.
13. Golman K, Almen T. Contrast media-induced nephrotoxicity: sur­vey and present state. Invest Radiol 1985;21:S92–S97.
14. Kerns SR, Hawkins IF. Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiogra­phy: expanding applications and technical evolution. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:735–741.
15. Hawkins IF, Caridi JG, Kerns SR. Plastic bag delivery system for hand injection of carbon dioxide. Am J Radiol 995;165:1487–1489.
16. Diaz LP, Pabion IP, Garcia JA, Lopez M. Assessment of CO raphy in arterial occlusive disease of the lower extremities. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;1:163–169.
17. Rolland Y, Duvauferrier R, Lucas A, et al. Lower limb angiography: a prospective study comparing carbon dioxide with iodinated con­trast material in 30 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:333–337.
18. Kaufman JA, et al. Renal insufficiency: gadopentetate dimeglumine as a radiographic contrast agent during peripheral vascular inter­ventional procedures. Radiology 1996;198:579–581.
19. Kaufman JA, et al. Gadolinium-based contrast agents as an alterna­tive at vena cavography in patients with renal insufficiency: early experience. Radiology 1999;212:280–284.
20. Spinosa DJ, Angle JF, Hagspiel KD, Hartwell GD, Matsumoto AH. Lower extremity arteriography with use of iodinated contrast mate­rial or gadodiamide to supplement CO with renal insufficiency. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1996;11:35–43.
21. Spinosa DJ, Matsumoto AH, Angle JF, Hagspiel KD. Use of gadopentetate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty and stent placement. Kidney Int 1998;53:503–507.
angiography in patients
2
arteriog-
2
I.Osborn and R. SnyderAnApproach to Sedation and Monitoring
https://t.me/med1917
4
■■■
An Approach to Sedation and Monitoring
IRENE OSBORN AND RANDALL SNYDER
As the complexity and duration of diagnostic vascular and interventional procedures have increased, it has become more important to provide adequate comfort for the pa­tient. Interventional radiologists must consider that pa­tients are anxious about the procedure, will be in a supine position on a hard and generally uncomfortable proce­dure table, and are usually in a cold environment. Inter­ventional radiologists also must address the pain or pos­sibility of pain during the procedure. Monitoring the patient during the procedure, especiallyif conscious seda­tion is administered, and monitoring during recovery are essential. Patients must refrain from moving for much of the procedure, and cooperate in specific breath-holding maneuvers during some manipulations and during most image acquisitions. Thus, the role of sedation and moni­toring is key.
Personnel attending to patients undergoing interven­tional procedures should have sufficient knowledge of the pharmacology, indications, and contraindications for relevant sedative agents and the ability to recognize and initiate treatment for any adverse reaction to those agents as well as have basic skills in emergency airway manage­ment and resuscitation. In addition to the supervising physician, the team should include a health professional whose primary job is monitoring the patient and who is available to the patient during the procedure and post­procedure recovery phase, until the patient has been transferred to appropriate recovery room personnel.
Intravenous conscious sedation is a minimally de­pressed level of consciousness induced by the administra­tion of pharmacologic agents, in which the patient re­tains conscious and independent ability to maintain a patent airway and to respond to physical and or verbal
1
stimulation. Deep sedation is a controlled state of de­pressed consciousness or unconsciousness from which the patient is not easily aroused; it is accompanied by a partial or complete loss of protective reflexes, including the ability to maintain a patent airway independently and loss of appropriate response to physical stimulation or verbal command. During conscious sedation, a patient may start out anxious or agitated but will become tran­quil, cooperative, and oriented; during the deepest level of conscious sedation, the patient may be somnolent, responding to commands only. When the patient enters a state of deep sedation, the patient may respond only to loud auditory stimuli or may exhibit sluggish or absent response to a loud stimulus or glabellar tap. Deep seda­tion is monitored under the care of an anesthesia, rather than a procedural, team. led state of unconsciousness in which there is a loss of protective reflexes, including the ability to maintain a patent airway independently and to respond appropri­ately to physical stimulation or verbal command.
Before intravenous conscious sedation is instituted, a pertinent history and physical examination must be per­formed or they must be available from the day of the procedure. A specific allergic history is also necessary. An assessment of baseline vital signs, level of consciousness, motor function, electrocardiogram (ECG) and oximetry also should be done. In children, weight is needed to determine dose determination. During conscious seda­tion, intravenous access must be continually maintained. Monitoring of physiologic measurements should be per­formed and recorded at least every 15 minutes during the procedure and into the recovery phase. Physiologic pa­rameters to be measured include level of consciousness,
2
General anesthesia is a control-
25
26 I. Osborn and R. Snyder
https://t.me/med1917
respiratory function, oximetry, blood pressure, and heart rate and rhythm. Supplemental oxygen and suction must be immediately available and a defibrillator with a crash cart that has backup emergency power also should be available immediately. These general principles apply to adults. Requirements for pediatric sedation and analgesia in children are somewhat more specific.
3
■ Pharmacologic Agents
Widely used agents for anxiety in the interventional suite include the benzodiazepines midazolam (Versed) and di­azepam (Valium). Lorazepam (Ativan) is another benzo­diazepine that can be used for sedation. Like most other agents, benzodiazepines are usually administered intra­venously. These anxiolytic agents are important com­ponents of intraprocedural sedation, but they can be used as the initial premedication soon after the patient has arrived in the angiography suite and consent has been obtained. Benzodiazepines provide anxiolysis and amne­sia and have anticonvulsant properties; they are also re­versible. These agents can cause respiratory depression and hypotension, and may interact with administered opioids (Table 4-1).
For analgesia, three commonly used opioids are mor­phine, meperidine (Demerol), and fentanyl. Opioids pro­vide analgesia and sedation; they are reversible, but they may cause respiratory depression, nausea, and hypoten­sion. Benzodiazepines and opioids may interact. Addi­tional agents that may be useful include droperidol, a
major tranquilizer that supplements sedation and pro­duces a calm appearance, but is not administered as a sole agent. Droperidol is useful for the prevention and treat­ment of nausea. Ketamine, administered intravenously over 2 to 3 minutes, may be used for additional analgesia. Ketamine may cause hallucinations and is generally given after benzodiazepines are first administered and the pa­tient is reassured. Ketamine is a powerful analgesic that can be used in painful procedures such as percutaneous biliary drainage.
Reversal agents includeflumazenil (Romazicon), which is used to reverse the effects of benzodiazepines, and nal­oxone (Narcan), which can reverse the effects of opioids.
■ Physiologic Monitoring: Vital Signs
Monitoring during conscious sedation by an independent observer who is trained in patient care and monitoring, such as a registered nurse or physician assistant, is manda-
1
tory.
Although physiologic monitoring is essential and required, it is not a substitute for direct patient observa­tion. Patients undergoing conscious sedation should be quiet but easily arousable. Respirator y depression or ap­nea, hypotension, contrast reactions, and cardiac arryth­mia and arrest can occur, and it is essential that the in­terventional radiologist be prepared to handle these potential adverse events. We also usually monitor patients undergoing procedures that do not use intravenous con­scious sedation because patients may have comorbid con­ditions and because even benign procedures may engen-
TABLE 4-1. Commonly Used Agents for Conscious Sedation
“Metabolism,”
Agent Class/indication Usual IV dosage contraindications (min.) Half life
Diazepam Benzodiazepine: anxiolysis 5–10 mg Liver 30 21 h
(0.1 mg/kg)
Midazolam Benzodiazepine: anxiolysis 2–5 mg Liver 10 2.5 h
(0.1 mg/kg) max Hypotension Lorazepam Benzodiazepine: anxiolysis 2.5 mg Elderly 20 h duration of effect Morphine sulfate Opioid: analgesia 5–10 mg Liver 20 3–4 h duration of effect
(0.15 mg/kg) Hypotension Meperidine Opioid: analgesia 25–75 mg Liver 20 2–4 h duration of effect
(1.0 – 1.5 mg/kg) Hypotension Fentanyl Opioid: analgesia 1–2 microgram/kg Liver 5–10 2–4 h
Benadryl Antihistamine 25–50 mg ↑ intraocular pressure Naloxone Reversal agent 0.1–0.2 mg Hypertension 3 20 min. Flumazenil Reversal agent 0.2 – 1mg max 3–5 10 min. duration of effect Ketamine Analgesia 0.25 mg/kg Increased intracranial 5–7 2 h
Inapsine Anti-nausea agent 1.25–2.5 mg Elderly debilitated pts. 20 4h
(Droperidol)
IV, intravenous
common Peak
CNS depressants
pressure, Anxiety
An Approach to Sedation and Monitoring 27
https://t.me/med1917
der physiologic responses (e.g., a peripherally inserted central catheter line in the right ventricle can induce an arrythmia).
The blood pressure may be taken manually, but, more commonly, automatic noninvasive arterial blood pres­sures are used. These automated devices also allow obser­vation of the ECG, heart rate, respiratory rate, and pulse oximetry.
The width of the blood pressure cuff should be ap­proximately 40% of the upper arm circumference, with the length approximately 80% of the arm circumfer-
4
ence.
Falsely elevated blood pressures can be obtained
with cuffs that are either too narrow or too loose.
The normal respiratory rate for adults is between 12 and 20 breaths per minute. Bradypnea may be associated with conscious sedation and analgesia and may signal oversedation. Tachypnea often is related to preprocedure anxiety, but it may have physiologic causes as well.
Pulse oximetry
Pulse oximetry uses spectrophotometry to measure changes in light absorption of blood. The pulse oximeter is an essential monitoring device that noninvasively meas­ures arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SaO pulse rate. Oxygen is highly bound to hemoglobin, and one hemoglobin module may bind zero to four molecules of oxygen.
5
For example, when four oxygen molecules are bound, the hemoglobin molecule is 100% saturated; when one is bound, it is 25% saturated. SaO
2
saturated hemoglobin to the total number of hemoglobin modules, and it is a fairly good reflection of arterial oxy­genation. SaO oxygen (PaO ciation cur ve. PaO
is directly related to the partial pressure of
2
) via the well-known oxyhemoglobin disso-
2
is a reflection of the amount of oxy-
2
gen dissolved in the blood and normally ranges from 80 to 100 mm of mercury when pH and body temperature are normal. This is equivalent to an SaO
of 95 to 100%, the
2
normal range seen on the pulse oximeter. Pulse oximetry is a reliable indicator of SaO
and has become the stand-
2
ard of care for patients receiving conscious sedation and analgesia. If the SaO
falls below 95%, immediate assess-
2
ment of the patient’s ventilation and status should be performed. Pulse oximetry providesan indication of early hypoxemia. Because procedural positioning oreven drap­ing of the patient may make it difficult to observe the patient’s ventilatory status, it is an essential tool in pro­viding uninterrupted continuous monitoring of the pa­tient.
Capnography allows monitoring end expiratory carb­on dioxide and can be used for early detection of hy­poventilation and airway obstruction. Its use is becoming increasingly encouraged for monitoring patients under­going conscious sedation.
), and
2
is the ratio of
Electrocardiogram
The final, but by far the most important, monitoring parameter is the ECG. We monitor the ECG in virtually all patients undergoing vascular and interventional pro­cedures, even those performed without conscious seda­tion. A procedure should not be started until an adequate tracing is obtained. ECG monitoring requires the proper placement of at least two sensing electrodes and a third ground or reference electrode. Because the ECG is a small (1 mV) electrical signal, its measurement is suscep­tible to electrical interference from other sources, espe­cially power cords, electrocautery, and patient motion. It is important that electrodes have adequate contact gel and be applied to clean, dry skin.
The most commonly monitored lead is lead II because the P wave is easily seen and has the greatest voltage in this lead. This orientation allows enhanced detection of dysrhythmias as well as diagnosis of inferior wall ischemia. Lead V5 is monitored for the detection of myocardial ischemia because the bulk of left ventricular myocardium lies beneath it. If only a three-lead system is available, a modified V5 lead can be obtained by placing the right arm lead under the right clavicle, the left arm lead in the V5 position, and the left leg lead in its usual position while monitoring lead I.
6
A preprocedural rhythm strip should be obtained as standard protocol so that any potential change in rhythm or ST segment that is appreciated can be compared with a baseline later. If the patient has significant cardiac dis­ease, a five-lead system may be used which will provide 80 to 96% sensitivity for the detection of intraprocedural cardiac events. Lead II alone has a sensitivity of only 18 to 33%. Prompt treatment of dysrhythmias or tachyarrhyth­mias is often necessary in the inter ventional suite. A working knowledge of ACLS may be helpful in these situations.
■ American Society of Anesthesiologist
Classification
In 1940 the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) developed a physical status classification for patients re­ceiving anesthesia and surgery to standardize physical and clinical status for statistical analysis and outcomes research for hospital records (Table 4-2). This classifica­tion was further modified by Dripps et al in 1961, and it remains the standard classification used by anesthesiolo­gists and others to characterize the patients’ physical status preprocedurally or preoperatively. not intended as such, the ASA physical status classifica­tion has since been shown to correlate well with the perioperative mortality rate.
7
Although it was
28 I. Osborn and R. Snyder
https://t.me/med1917
TABLE 4-2. Physical Status Classification of the
American Society of Anesthesiologists*
a
Class
1 Healthy patient 0.06–0.08 2 Mild systemic disease 0.27–0.4 3 Severe systemic disease, not incapacitating 1.8–4.3 4 Severe systemic disease that is a constant 7.8–23
5 Moribund, not expected to live 24 h 9.4–51
a
Refs: 7, 8
** An E is added to ASA status to designate an emergency operation.
Description rate (%)
threat to life
irrespective of operation
Mortality
Underlying disease is only one of many factors that con­tribute to perioperativecomplications. ASAphysical status classification is a useful tool in planning anesthetic man­agement and level of intraprocedural monitoring and it can be used by the interventionalist to categorize potential procedural risk.
8
In some institutions, ASA classification is used as criterion for calling an anesthesia consultation for procedural management in interventional radiology.
Patients receiving intravenous conscious sedation should recover in an area where continuous monitoring and resuscitative equipment are available. Patients should be monitored to full recovery by a return to baseline mental status and vital signs. Many institutions utilize an objective scoring system, such as the Aldrete or modified Aldrete score.
9,10
The Aldrete system scores patients from 0 to 2 on five parameters: activity, respiration, circulation (blood pressure), consciousness, and skin color. Return to physiologic baseline or an adequate pre-set score on these parameters is required for discharge from the pro­cedure area (intensive monitoring, phase I) to a less in­tensive recovery area (phase II). Additional discharge cri­teria from the phase II area may include the ability to tolerate the fluids taken orally, minimal or absent nausea or vomiting, lack of dizziness when sitting, a complete
return to the baseline level of consciousness, absence of pain, and ability to urinate.
4
If short-acting sedation agents have been used, some patients may be discharged from this area in as little as 1 hour, but other procedural factors may mandate longer observation (e.g., the pres­ence of an arterial puncture site or the need to watch for bleeding after deep organ biopsy). When short-acting re­versal agents are used during the procedure, it is essential to observe the patient for a sufficient time to allow ob­servation of the reemerging effects of the longer-acting agonists; this is typically 2 hours if short-acting benzo­diazepines and opioids have been used. Patients should be cautioned not to drive or operate heavy machinery for at least 24 hours after the administration of analgesic sedative agents. Patients should not be sent home with pain that cannot be controlled with oral analgesics, and they should have 24 hour emergency contacts and written postoperative instructions before discharge.
REFERENCES
1. American College of Radiology. Standard for use of intravenous conscious sedation. 1998 ACR Standards. Reston, VA: ACR; 1998
2. Ramsey MAE, Savage TM, Simpson TRJ, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. BMJ 1974;2:656–659.
3. American College of Radiology. Standard for pediatric sedation/ analgesia. 1998 ACR Standards. Reston, VA: ACR, 1998.
4. Watson DS. Conscious Sedation/Analgesia. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998.
5. Westmiller SW, Hoffman LA, Wiseman M. Understanding transtra­cheal oxygen delivery. Nursing 1989; 12:43–47.
6. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS. Clinical Anesthesiology. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1992.
7. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 1961;178:261.
8. Muravchick S. The Anesthetic Plan: From Physiologic Principles to Clini- cal Strategies. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991.
9. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970;49(6):924–934.
10. Aldrete JA. Modifications to the postanesthesia score for use in ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs 1998;13(3):148–155.
J.A. KaufmanMRand CT Angiography
https://t.me/med1917
5
■■■
Magnetic Resonance and Computed
Tomographic Angiography
JOHN A. KAUFMAN
The choice of an imaging modality for patients with vas­cular disease is no longer straightforward. Conventional angiography has benefited greatly from the development of safer contrast agents, sophisticated cathetersand guide­wires, and digitally enhanced image acquisition. Innova­tions in cross-sectional imaging technology, however, have resulted in a number of less invasive vascular imaging mo­dalities. It is now conceivable that ina singleinstitution the following menu could exist for vascular imaging: film­screen angiography, intraarterial digital subtraction an­giography (IADSA), intravenous DSA (IVDSA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomographic angiography (CTA), duplex and color-flow ultrasound, contrast enhanced ultrasound, transesophageal/translu­minal ultrasound, three-dimensional ultrasound, intravas­cular ultrasound, and isotope angiography. How does one choose the correct test, or is there such a thing? This chapter focuses on two of these modalities: CTA and MRA and when each should be used.
The ideal vascular imaging modality would be rapid, accurate, painless, risk free, applicable to all patients, easy to interpret, and inexpensive. Because of its proven accu­racy and wide acceptance by clinicians, traditional an­giography is the standard against which all new modali­ties must be compared. Traditional angiography provides reliable diagnostic images and is applicable to large num­bers of patients, but it is associated with some degree of discomfort and risk. noninvasive imaging modalities that can provide accurate angiographic information quickly in large numbers of patients. Both modalities have different strengths and weaknesses, which in many cases are complementary. The clinical evaluation and application of MRA and CTA
1
MRA and CTA hold promise as
are ongoing, yet there is no doubt that these techniques will have important roles in vascular imaging in the fu­ture.
■ Basic Techniques
MR imaging/MRA
Principles of MR imaging
One need only understand that MR imaging (MRI) is based on the detection of radiofrequency signals emitted by protons spinning within a powerful magnetic field. In the bore of an MR scanner, protons in tissue preferentially align the axes of their spins with the magnetic field (longi- tudinal magnetization). By applying a radiofrequency pulse to the protons, the spins can be deflected momentarily, or “tipped,” out of alignment with the magnetic field, in a plane perpendicular to the magnetic field (transverse mag- netization). The degree of deflection is determined by characteristics of the radiofrequency pulse and is de­scribed as the flip angle. As the protons realign with the magnetic field (relaxation), a signal (echo) is created. Im­ages are created that emphasize the vectors of the longi­tudinal (T1) or transverse (T2) relaxation of the spins as they realign. In general, short echo times reflect the longitudinal magnetization (T1 weighted), and long echo times the transverse magnetization (T2 weighted). By vary­ing how often and how forcefully the protons are tipped, as well as when the echo is sampled, the same tissue may
2
appear alternatively bright or dark. The complex behav­ior of protons in magnetic fields provides the basis for the
29
30 J. A. Kaufman
https://t.me/med1917
wide variety of pulse sequences and imaging strategies available in MRI.
MRI technology
Most first-generation of MR scanners were constructed using a central tunnel or bore lined with coiled super­conducting wires. Generally, the higher the field strength (measured in Tesla [T], and ranging from 0.3 to 1.5 T for most clinical scanners), the larger the actual scanner and the higher the signal-to-noise ratio in the images. Al­though these scanners remain in active clinical use, newer “open” magnet designs are becoming available. These scanners offer the practical advantages of accommodating larger patients than the older devices as well as presenting a less confined scanning environment to claustrophobic patients. Of great interest to vascular and interventional radiologists is the possibility of performing MR-guided procedures in magnets with open designs that permit ac­cess to the patient during scan acquisition. Sophisticated targeting and device tracking technology is required in this environment, and special equipment construction is necessary for working within the strong magnetic field. Nevertheless, this technology offers great promise, par­ticularly in patients in whom pathologic processes can be imaged only by using MRI.
3
Principles of MRA
One of the most common non-contrast enhanced appli­cations of MRI in vascular and interventional radiology is MRA. Early in the clinical application of MRI, it was noted that flowing blood sometimes appeared bright on images of the brain and body. The brightness of the blood sug­gested that angiographic information could be obtained without catheterization and injection of iodinated con­trast agents. In a landmark article in Science in 1985, Wedeen and co-workers published the first true angio­graphic images created using MR techniques.
4
The initial clinical applications of MRA were in the intracranial arte­rial circulation and the extracranial carotid arteries. Now MRA is performed in all areas of the body, with the most common nonneurological applications being lower­extremity arteries and veins, the abdominal aorta, the renal arteries, the portal veins, and the thoracic aorta.
5–14
The two most common MRA techniques are time-of­flight (TOF) and phase-contrast (PC) MRA. Both tech­niques can be used to acquire data on a slice-by-slice basis [two-dimensional (2-D)] or as a volume acquisition [three-dimensional (3-D)]. In general, thinner images can be obtained using 3-D techniques, but signal-to-noise is better in 2-D images. Acquisitions also may be cardiac gated, so that images are obtained at the same level throughout the cardiac cycle or at different levels at the same point in the cardiac cycle. Images obtained at one level throughout the cardiac cycle can be displayed in a
movie loop (cine), which is useful in situations such as evaluting cardiac valvular competence. Gating to obtain images at multiple levels at the same point in the cardiac cycle minimizes pulsatility artifact and signal loss in mul­tiphasic flow.
TOF/MRA
The most widely available MRA technique for body appli­cations is TOF MRA. With this technique, stationar y tis­sues are subjected to multiple and frequent radiofre­quency pulses; so the spins do not have time to realign (relax) with the magnetic field, resulting in saturation of the tissues and only a weak signal. Blood that flows into the area being imaged contains spins that have not yet been subjected to the radiofrequency pulses. These fresh, or unsaturated, spins emit a strong signal when they first enter the area being imaged and thus appear bright (Fig. 5-1). If the blood is exposed to the radiofrequency pulses for any length of time, however, it will become saturated and indistinguishable from the surrounding stationary tissues. This problem is particularly troublesome when using 3-D or volume imaging or when vessels are in the plane of a 2-D slice (Fig. 5-2).
Flow from all directions into a slice or volume will be visualized during MRA unless measures are taken to se­lect flow in the direction of interest. With TOF MRA this visualization usually can be accomplished by saturating the spins in unwanted blood with radiofrequency pulses before they enter the area being imaged. These radiofre­quency pulses are applied in a broad presaturation slab positioned outside the area of interest (Fig. 5-3). For example, with 2-D TOF MRA of the lower extremity arter­ies, source images are acquired in the axial plane; to
FIGURE 5-1. Schematic diagram of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Signal from background tissues is suppressed by repetitive radiofrequency pulses. Signal is emit­ted from the fresh spins in blood as it enters the imaging volume or slice.
A B
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 5-2. Saturation of signal from in-plane flow. A: Coronal maximum intensity projection of a two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiogram of the popliteal arteries and proximal tibial arteries. The source images were acquired in the axial plane. There is loss of signal in the horizontal (in-plane) portion of the right anterior tibial artery origin ( which could be due to either a stenosis or artifactual signal loss. B: Con­ventional angiogram of the same patient shows that this artery is normal
arrow
). C: Schematic diagram illustrating saturation of in-plane flow.
C
(
arrow
),
FIGURE 5-3. Saturation slabs are critical in time-of-flight im­aging to eliminate unwanted signal from flowing blood. In this schematic, arterial blood entering the slice from the left con­tains fresh spins that can be imaged. The spins in venous blood are saturated when they pass through a saturation slab outside of the imaging slice, so that no signal is emitted when they enter the slice.
32 J. A. Kaufman
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 5-4. Gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiogram of a nor­mal aortic arch. Note that the subclavian artery flow ( imaging volume, does not become saturated, and retains excellent signal because of the gadolin­ium. The pulmonary arteries and veins ( vena cava (S) is faintly seen as a result of rapid shunting of gadolinium through the cerebral circulation and enhancement of the jugular veins and subsequently the superior vena cava.
curved arrows
arrows
), which reverses direction within the
) are visible within the chest. The superior
eliminate signal from the veins, a presaturation slab is placed inferior to the slice of interest (i.e., toward the feet), thus saturating spins in the venous blood before they flow into the slice. To obtain a 2-D TOF MR veno­gram of the lower extremities, the presaturation slab is repositioned superior (i.e., toward the head) to the slice of interest to saturate the spins in the arterial blood before they flow into the slice. Care must be taken when imaging tortuous vessels, however, as they may loop into the presaturation slab and appear occluded on the MRA.
Flowing blood produces the brightest signal when the spins all move at the same velocity, in the same direction, and perpendicular to the plane of image acquisition. Un­fortunately,blood flowis complexin vivoas aresult ofsuch diverse factors as shear along the vessel wall; changes in velocity and acceleration resulting from cardiac activity, elastic recoil of arterial walls,and stenoses;and turbulence caused by tortuosity of blood vessels, aneurysms, or ste­noses. Each of these factors results in some loss of signal from blood with all MRA techniques. Strategies to reduce this signal loss include techniques such as flow compensa­tion and cardiac gating, but all incur a time penalty.
Gadolinium-enhanced MRA
One of the most effective strategies to increase intravascu­lar signal with TOF sequences is the addition of an MR contrast agent, such as gadolinium, as described by Prince.
15
This agent has been applied most successfully to 3-D acquisitions, although it can be used with 2-D imaging as well. Gadolinium-based contrast agents act to shorten the T1 of blood and tissues. In conventional MRI, a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg (0.2 mL/kg) is administered intrave­nously before the patient is placed in the scanner to evalu­ate the soft tissues. For vascular imaging, a relatively large volume ofgadolinium contrast (up to0.4 mmol/kg, or 0.8
mL/kg) is injected rapidly during the acquisition of a 3-D volume. The arteries are preferentially enhanced, much in the same fashion that arteries are visualized during rapid venous injection of iodinated contrast agents with IVDSA. This technique eliminates loss of signal resulting
15
from slow, turbulent, or in-plane flow.
Large fields of view can be covered without signal loss in blood that re­mains within the imaging volume (Fig. 5-4). This tech­nique has become widely used in body MRA.
PC MRA
PC MRA is both more complex and less widely available than TOF sequences because the demands on scanner hardware, particularly gradient coils, are greater with PC than with TOF MRA. The fundamental principles of PC MRA are that gradients var y in strength within the mag­netic field, and the phase of a spin will vary in proportion to the strength and duration of an applied magnetic gradient (Fig. 5-5). If equal and opposite gradients are applied, a spin that remains stationary will deflect in an equal and opposite manner. When the vectors of these opposite and equal deflections are subtracted, the net value (or phase shift) is zero. When a moving spin is exposed to the same equal and opposite gradients, the spinning proton moves to a physically different place within the magnet during the time between application of the gradients. The strength of the gradients varies depending on their location within the magnetic field. As a result, the vectors of the deflections caused by the gradients are opposite but not equal. Subtraction of these two opposite but unequal vectors results in a measurable net phase shift, which then can be displayed as signal, whereas stationary background tissues with a net phase shift of “0” have no signal. The larger the phase shift (the greater the distance that the spin moves or the larger the
FIGURE 5-5. Schematic drawing of the principle of phase-con-
https://t.me/med1917
trast angiography. When stationary spins are exposed to equal and opposite gradient pulses, the deflections of the spins are equal and opposite; therefore, there is no net signal. When the same gradient pulses are applied to a moving spin, the deflec­tions are opposite but not equal because of variation in gradient strength within the magnet. Therefore, a net signal is created that can be imaged. (After Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Pelc NJ. Phase sensitive flow imaging. In: Gottschalk A, ed.
Resonance Angiography: Concepts and Applications.
EJ, Siebert JE, Haacke EM, St Louis: Mosby, 1993).
Magnetic
Potchen
applied gradient), the stronger the signal. PC MRA is by definition a purely subtractive technique in that only moving spins will be visualized, with no need to saturate background tissues as in TOF techniques.
The direction of flow is an important consideration in PC MRA because phase shifts occur only in the direction of the phase encoding gradient. Blood flow in most areas of the body is complex, rather than unidirectional. Con­sider the right renal artery, which arises from a slightly anterior location on the abdominal aorta, curves posteri­orly behind the inferior vena cava, and then curves inferi­orly toward the renal hilum. Imaging only right-to-left flow in this artery would result in incomplete visualization of the proximal and distal portions of the vessel. By ac­quiring phase shifts in all three directions (right to left, superior to inferior, and anterior to posterior), a com­plete study of the vessel can be performed (Fig. 5-6). Unfortunately, one pair of gradients is required per direc­tion to create phase shifts. With each set of gradients used, the time required to perform the study increases. Fortunately, flow in three directions can be imaged with four, rather than six, gradients using a technique known as Hadamard multiplexing. Nevertheless, the time re­quired to complete a PC acquisition is long relative to TOF MRA.
One of the most critical elements of PC MRA is the velocity of the blood flow to be imaged. The goal of PC imaging is to maximize the phase shifts in flowing spins (large shifts result in brighter-appearing flow in the final images). Phase shift is directly proportional to several con­stants (such as the strength of the magnetic field) and to the variables of velocity of the spins and the amplitude of the gradients. Thus, larger gradients are required to im-
MR and CT Angiography 33
age slow flow and smaller gradients to image faster flow. The parameter that describes this relationship is velocity encoding (V
), usually calibrated in centimeters per sec-
enc
ond. For example, normal main renal artery flow is ap­proximately 100 cm/sec; so one would selecta V
enc
slightly higher than the expected flow (perhaps 110 cm/sec) to optimize visualization of flow in this portion of the vessel. Flow at other velocities (such as in the peripheral intra­renal arteries) will not image as well. Furthermore, if the flow is slower than expected, perhaps because of severe occlusive disease in the artery or poor cardiac output, imaging at a high V
will result in poor visualization of
enc
the main renal arter y flow. Currently, there is no widely available method for quickly determining which V
enc
will result in the best image for a particular vessel in a particu­lar patient. This limitation of PC MRA is one of the major impediments to more widespread application of this tech­nique.
The information acquired during PC MRA can be proc­essed in several ways. The most common technique is phase difference, in which phase shifts are assigned a pixel value and color based on thevalue of the subtracted phase angle (Fig. 5-7). The intensity of the pixel reflects the size of the phase shift, with the most intense pixels repre­senting flow closest to the value of the V
. Directional
enc
information can be provided easily by displaying the pix­els as either black or white; spins moving in the direction of the velocity gradients appear white, and those moving in the opposite direction appear black. Spins moving in a direction at right angles to the velocity gradients have no signal. A common artifact is the abrupt transition of one pixel color to another that occurs when the velocity of flow exceeds the V
, termed aliasing, and is easily recog-
enc
nized by the irregular interface between the two colors caused by the pixel edges (Fig. 5-8).
Limitations
All MRA techniques are subject to certain limitations. Patients with pacemakers, intraocular or intraaural metal­lic foreign bodies, or claustrophobia cannot undergo im­aging. Most MR units carefully screen patients with both a questionnaire and a brief interview with the technolo­gist before scanning. Patients who are hemodynamically unstable require careful monitoring during scanning us­ing specialized equipment that is compatible with strong magnetic fields. Turbulent flow (such as immediately dis­tal to a stenosis) is difficult to image with non-gadolin­ium-enhanced techniques, as the spins are extremely dis­organized in orientation and appear as areas of signal loss. Lastly, uncooperative patients or those with demen­tia may not be able to remain still during image acquisi­tion, introducing motion artifacts that can render a study uninterpretable.