Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3860_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
94 C. E. Ray Jr. and A. C. Waltman
https://t.me/med1917
considered necessary, embolic material of choice.
23,24
and Gelfoam pledgets are the
22
Preemptive embolization of arterial branches that are transected but not actively bleeding, as evidenced angiographically by complete oc­clusion secondary to spasm, is advocated by some authors because the likelihood of delayed hemorrhage is signifi­cant in this setting.
22
Finally, many trauma patients are hypothermic and therefore coagulopathic, delaying clot formation and possibly allowing retrograde collaterals to open and bleed.
25
Posttraumatic hemorrhage also can be visualized in
other organ systems such as the kidney,
24
liver.
Organ preservation is often the goal in such pa-
24
spleen,
17,26
and
tients, and superselective catheterization and em­bolotherapy in a hemodynamically stable patient are war­ranted. In unstable patients, however, proximal occlusion may be the most timely and effective therapy. In the setting of active bleeding from the spleen following blunt trauma, proximal coil occlusion of the splenic artery ob­viated laparotomy in 94% of patients, and splenic salvage was achieved in 97% of patients.
26
Iatrogenic trauma, including complications arising during diagnostic angiography, also may be amenable to transcatheter em­bolotherapy.
27
Arteriovenous malformations
Vascular malformations represent vascular abnormalities that can be characterized best by the appearance of the endothelial cells at histologic examination.
28
AVMs, as opposed to hemangiomas, demonstrate normal endothe­lial cells and mast cells that tend to grow over time; his­tologically, multiple arteriovenous communications, are present representing the nidus of the malformation, with multiple feeding arteries and draining veins. Conversely, arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) represent a single commu­nication between a feeding artery and a draining vein, usually occurring in larger vessels than those seen with AVMs.
AVMs are a clinically difficult entity, often requiring several surgical procedures that may or may not be cura­tive. AVMs can be divided into primarily arterial malfor- mations, demonstrating high-flow and arteriovenous shunting, and primarily venous malformations, demon­strating phleboliths and slow flow.
29
Unless the nidus is embolized, AVMs will continue to recur and grow over time; in addition, several niduses may be encountered. Embolotherapy is directed against the nidus rather than the feeding arteries because embolization of the feeding vessels will occlude flow only temporarily and will stimu­late collateral flow to the AVM. Because the targeted vessels are small, embolization agents include small par­ticles or, most frequently, liquid agents such as glue or alcohol (Fig. 8-2).
17,30-32
In patients with predominantly venous malformations, or in those with lesions than are anatomically difficult to treat by transcatheter arterial
embolization, direct puncture and alcohol instillation on the venous side of the malformation have proved efficacious.
33
AVFs constitute a distinct histopathological entity with both a single feeding artery and a single draining vein. Because of this single, relatively large communication, and because preservation of the feeding arter y is a pri­mary goal, larger embolic agents such as coils are most efficacious when placed directly into the fistula it-
17,30,34
self;
if the fistula cannot be entered directly, the fistula may be sandwiched by placing coils into the feed­ing artery proximal and distal to the fistula, thus essen­tially isolating the fistula and preventing flow into it so that it may thrombose. Although this method may be effective, it can be used only when the feeding artery can be sacrificed completely without risk to organs distal to the fistula.
Pulmonary AVMs have a variety of histologic subtypes, the most common type involving a single feeding artery and a single draining vein, therefore representing a fis­tula rather than a malformation. Whereas embolization with detachable balloons acheived great success in the past, they are no longer approved by the v.s. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), nor are they or commer­cially available.
35
Glue has been used as an embolic agent although care must be taken to ensure that deposition occurs only in the fistula itself because downstream em­bolization could have severe consequences.
30
Organ ablation
Embolization procedures for organ ablation for benign etiologies include splenic embolization in the treatment of hypersplenism
36–38
and renal embolization in end­stage kidney disease for the management of hypertension and nephrotic syndrome.
17,39
Splenic embolization can be performed either as definitive therapy for hyper­splenism
37,38
or as a preoperative procedure.36When used as definitive therapy, it is recommended that 10% to 20% of the splenic arterial supply be spared to prevent infection from encapsulated organisms.
17,37,38
Because proximal occlusion of the main splenic artery may com­promise pancreatic supply or collaterals may reconstitute the splenic artery from the short gastric branches,
36
em­bolization of the intraparenchymal splenic artery branches or arterioles is recommended. Embolic agents have included Gelfoam pledgets, Silastic spheres. proach 100%,
41
While initial technical success rates ap-
37
platelet counts may decrease again
37,38
PVA particles,40and
within 6 month, indicating recurrent hypersplenism, and up to 23% of patients may require further interven-
43
tion.
When used as adjunctive therapy before splenec­tomy to decrease the amount of blood loss at surgery, embolization can be performed safely with gelatin sponge particles, PVA particles, coils, or a combination of these agents.
36
42
Embolization and Chemoembolization
https://t.me/med1917
95
A B
FIGURE. 8-2 A 20-year-old woman with a pulsatile, painful heel mass. A: Diagnostic angiography with the catheter placed above
the popliteal artery trifurcation demonstrates a hypervascular heel mass with large feeding branches arising from the posterior tibial artery. Notice the early draining posterior tibial vein ( performed with the catheter in the tibioperoneal trunk following embolization with small polyvinyl particles. Note the decreased vascularity and the lack of early draining veins postembolization.
Renal ablation procedures may be used in patients with
end-stage renal disease who are on dialysis or who are
arrow
) indicating significant arteriovenous shunting. B: Angiography
rior phrenic, and ureteral branches should be recognized and spared if possible.
39
postrenal transplantation in order to prevent renovascu­lar hypertension or nephrotic syndrome arising from the native kidneys.
17,39
The desired end result for “catheter nephrectomy” is complete organ necrosis and ablation; the embolic agents of choice are therfore liquid agents, such as alcohol, with or without concomitant permanent large-vessel occlusion with coils.
17,39
If accessory renal arteries are present, they all must be embolized to allow complete renal infarction. In addition, arteries arising from the renal artery such as the inferior adrenal, infe-
Neoplastic
sterile embolization
Embolization of tumors may be performed as an adjunct to other therapies such as systemic chemotherapy or sur­gery, as definitive therapy for the treatment of certain benign neoplasms, as palliative therapy for complications of neoplasms, or in combination with chemotherapy as chemoembolization. Sterile embolization procedures in-
96 C. E. Ray Jr. and A. C. Waltman
https://t.me/med1917
clude those in which there is no combination of the em­bolic agent with chemotherapeutic or immunologic medi­cations (Fig. 8-3).
Sterile embolization for complications arising from pri­mary or metastatic neoplasms may prove helpful. Hemor­rhage caused by neoplasms may be treated in the same manner as bleeding from benign sources discussed above with some modifications. In particular, hemoptysis arising from lung carcinoma may arise from the pulmonary as well as the systemic circulation; pulmonary angiography is therefore necessary in the absence of a bleeding source on the bronchial angiogram. Regardless of the organ involved, care must be taken to avoid permanent central vascular occlusion, such as with coils, because many tu­mors are likely to rebleed over time, and vascular access to the tumor must remain uncompromised. Hyper vascu­lar tumors, such as renal cell carcinoma or carcinnoid, are more likely to respond to embolotherapy because of the large amount of neovascularity. Occasionally, hepatic tumors parasitize blood supply from other vessels, which also may require embolization.
44
Palliative therapy may be provided by tumor emboliza­tion. Tumors causing symptoms by their proximity, size, or hormonal activity may respond to embolotherapy. Hepatic arterial embolotherapy, using Gelfoam pledgets, Gelfoam powder, or PVA particles, has proved efficacious for symptomatic relief in patients with hormone-secret­ing tumors metastatic to the liver, with clinical or labora­tory response rates ranging from 69% to 100%.
45–47
In-
creased survival rates in patients with metastatic carcinoid undergoing sterile embolization
46
and sterile emboliza­tion of other primary or secondary liver neoplasms have demonstrated increased survival rates.
48
Doppler ultra­sound of the liver before and after embolization may be helpful in determining residual or recurrent disease. Embolotherapy also has proved efficacious for control of tumor-induced hypoglycemia in patients who have fi­brosarcoma.
50
In some benign settings, embolization may be con­sidered a curative procedure rather than an adjunct. Uflacker demonstrated cures in two patients by using arterial embolization as the sole treatment for benign insulinomas of the pancreas.
51
Embolotherapy also can be used as a preoperative pro­cedure to decrease the amount of blood loss at surgery. The goal of embolization in these patients is decreased blood flow rather than infarction and cell death; there­fore, for patients scheduled for embolization close to the time of surger y, larger agents such as colis have been used to decrease the major blood supply to tumors because collateral flow is unlikely to develop prior to taking the patient to the operating room. A potential disadvantage to large vessel embolization is the possibil­ity of distal embolization into an aortic branch due to manipulations performed during the operative proce­dure. Gelfoam pledgets or large PVA particles may also be used. Although liquid embolic agents may be help-
52
ful,
they are not used commonly because of the in-
49
A B
FIGURE. 8-3 A 22-year-old woman who had undergone removal of the right kidney for childhood Wilm’s tumor who had develop
left-sided Wilm’s as an adult tumor. Preoperative embolization was performed to decrease blood loss at surgery. A: Selective digital subtraction angiogram of the left kidney demonstrating solitary left renal artery with neovascular changes compatible with Wilm’s tumor. B: Selective left renal angiogram showing embolization with Gelfoam pledgets and absolute alcohol and demonstrating complete cessation of flow to the kidney. Note the preserved flow in the superior capsular and inferior adrenal branches (
arrow
).
Embolization and Chemoembolization 97
https://t.me/med1917
creased risk and time required when using liquid em­bolic agents.
Chemoembolization
Chemoembolization combines the effects of locoregional chemotherapy and embolization during the same proce­dure to obtain a synergistic effect of both therapies. The liver is the most commonorgan toundergo chemoemboli­zation because of the high prevalence of disease and dual vascular supply to the organ. Whereas the normal liver derives its blood supply largely from the portal vein, in the setting of hepatic malignancy approximately 90% of the blood supply to the tumor arises from the hepatic artery, allowing most of the chemoembolic agent to be delivered to the tumor rather than to normal parenchyma during hepatic artery chemoembolization (HACE). Perhaps sur­prisingly, even in the setting of portal venous obstruction,
A
HACE, may be performed without significant risk of he­patic infarction (Fig. 8-4).
54
Chemoembolization of hepatic malignancies is re­served for surgically unresectable lesions. It should be considered adjunctive or palliative therapy, although scat-
55
tered cases of cure have been reported.
In addition, HACE is a multistage procedure, with patients undergo­ing embolization every 8 to 12 weeks for the duration of their disease or until hepatic insufficiency develops. The risks of HACE increase greatly with worsening liver dys-
56–59
function,
and the risk and benefits of repeat proce-
dures should be weighed. Alternative therapies such as
53
systemic or locoregional chemotherapy, percutaneous al­cohol ablation, or cryosurgery are other options that may be considered for the same patient population as those undergoing HACE. Cryosurgery requires an open surgi­cal procedure, and both percutaneous alcohol ablation
FIGURE 8-4. A 33-year-old man with hepatocellular carci­noma and portal vein invasion was referred for chemoem­bolization. A: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the liver demonstrated diffuse neoplastic involve­ment of the right hepatic lobe with tumor thrombus occlud­ing the right portal vein ( patent ( lobe. Tumor thrombus is also noted in the inferior vena cava ( the right hepatic artery demonstrating diffuse neovascular­ity involving the distribution of the markedly enlarged right hepatic artery. Note the early visualization of the left portal vein ( mor thrombus is visualized again in the right portal vein ( artery showing chemoembolization with Gelfoam and Adriamycin/mitomycin C/cisplatin slurry. There is marked diminution of neovascularity within the right hepatic lobe and no evidence for significant arteriovenous shunting, de­termined by nonvisualization of the left portal vein as dem­onstrated in (B).
open arrow
arrowhead
arrowhead
open arrow
). B: Selective digital subtraction angiogram of
). C: Selective angiogram of the right hepatic
arrow
) and supplies an enlarged left hepatic
) due to rapid arteriovenous shunting; tu-
). The left portal vein remains
CB
98 C. E. Ray Jr. and A. C. Waltman
https://t.me/med1917
and cryosurgery are limited by the number and size of hepatic lesions. Systemic and locoregional infusion che­motherapy requires doses of chemotherapy exceeding those used for HACE with added side effects for the pa­tient. Only HACE combines the ischemic effects of em­bolization with locoregional delivery of chemotherapy to the hepatic malignancies.
Chemoembolization may be performed as an adjunct
to surgery.
60
Increased survival rates in patients with re­current hepatocellular carcinoma were found in those who underwent HACE after partial hepatectomy (42% versus 18% at 3-year follow-up).
60
A 3-year survival rate of 77% was found in patients with initially inoperable hepa­totomas who underwent HACE and subsequently were determined to be operative candidates.
61
The technique used for HACE varies widely according to the institution where the procedure is undertaken. A coaxial system frequently is used to increase delivery of the chemoembolic mixture to the area of greatest inter­est; in patients with diffuse disease, chemoembolization may be performed in either the proper hepatic artery or in both the right and left hepatic arteries selectively. Em­bolizing one lobe per procedure in patients with diffuse disease may decrease the likelihood of hepatic insuffi­ciency.
Because tissue necrosis and cell death are the antici­pated end results of the procedure, distal embolic agents are used. Gelfoam powder and small PVA particles are the most commonly used embolic agents,
58–62
because liquid sclerosing agents may cause biliary sclerosis or necrosis of normal hepatic parenchyma. Proximal embolic materials, in particular coils, are to be avoided because repeat chemoembolization is the rule rather than the exception and vascular access to the tumor must be maintained. Lipiodol also is used frequently either in isolation or in combination with other embolic agents; lipiodol by itself has an affinity for hepatomas and presumbly will increase the amount ofchemoembolic agent delivered to the hepa­toma compared with normal surrounding tissue.
57–64
The chemotherapeutic agent may be delivered first, followed by embolization, or it may be mixed into a slurry with the embolic agent itself.The latterprotocol is preferred at our institutions, because delivery of the chemotherapeutic agent before embolization decreases the amount of the agent trapped with the tumor as a result of persistent arte­rial flow flushing the chemotherapeutic agent from the hepatic artery into the systemic circulation before arterial occlusion at embolization.
Protocols for the chemotherapy agents used vary widely from institution to institution. The most commonly used agents include Adriamycin,
60,62
and 5-fluorouracil.65The chemotherapeutic agent
C,
57,59
cisplatin,
57,61,63
mitomycin
used should vary depending on the type of hepatic malig­nancy; in other words, different agents given systemically,
are used for hepatoma metastatic colon carcinoma, and metastatic carcinoid, and similar agents should be consid­ered for locoregional therapy such as chemoemboliza­tion. Consultation with medical oncologists proveshelpful when deciding on the appropriate drug regimen.
Results for patients undergoing HACE depend on the type of malignancy being treated. The tumors that have been investigated most extensively include hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). metastatic endocrine tumors, and me­tastatic colorectal carcinoma. Hepatocellular carcinoma response rates vary with the protocol used, the size and histologic type of tumor, and the degree of underlying hepatic insufficiency. Regarding the degree of insuffi­ciency, patients with more severe underlying liver disease tend to have decreased survival compared with patients whose hepatocyte function is relatively normal before HACE is performed.
58,59
The 2-year survival rates of pa­tients with HCC treated by HACE were 49% 29%, and 9% for patients with Pugh’s class A, B, and C hepatic dysfunc­tion, respectively in one study.
59
Additional factors that are poor prognostic indicators include tumor type and extension, portal vein involvement, tumor area, and pres­ence of ascites and icterus;
66
other studies have shown no prognostic significance to tumor type and portal vein in­volvement.
56
Most studies demonstrate a 2-year survival
for HCC treated with HACE of between 33% and
57,63,65
38%,
although survival rates of up to 92% at 2-years have been reported in patients with HCC with a diameter smaller than 4 cm.
58
A recent European study, however, demonstrated no significant increase in the survival rates for patients with HCC undergoing HACE, although this study has major methodological shortcomings.
63
Chemoembolization of metastatic endocrine tumors
gives perhaps the best results of all liver malignan-
46,52,65,68–70
cies.
In this patient population, it is estimated that because of diffuse involvement of the liver fewer than 10% of all patients are surgical candidates. rates vary from 70% 100%
46,68,70
when using symptomatic
68
Response
relief as the endpoint, whereas biologic response, as evi­denced by decreased levels of hormonal breakdown prod­ucts, is seen in 57% to 100% of patients.
65,68,69
Carcinoid syndrome appears to respond somewhatmore favorablyto HACE than to other hormonally active metastatic tu-
69
mors.
Benefits from chemoembolization of metastatic colon carcinoma are less apparent. Response rates, measured by a decrease in the size of tumors on follow-up imaging studies or a decrease in the serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, range from 33 to 87%.
55,70,71
One study demonstrated complete disappearance of liver metasta­ses in 17% of patients, although these results have not been duplicated.
55
Survival rates in patients who undergo HACE are comparable to those in patients who undergo systemic chemotherapy.
72
Embolization and Chemoembolization
https://t.me/med1917
99
Adjunctive therapy is of paramount importance in the HACE patient population. Anticipated side effects of HACE include right upper quadrant pain, fevers, nausea, and transiently elevated liver enzymes.
57,61,63–65
Pain is fre­quently severe enough to warrant narcotic therapy and should be anticipated by both physician and patient. Nau­sea usually can be controlled by antiemetic medication such as granisetron or compazine. Liver enzymes almost invariably will elevate immediately following the proce­dure as a result of hepatocyte death; however, persistently elevated enzymes beyond 3 weeks may indicate hepatic infarction, and repeat HACE may be contraindicated.
57,63
Infection following HACE is relatively uncommon,
with sepsis occuring in fewer than 1% of patients.
73
Be­cause hepatic abscess formation can be a relatively severe side effect, broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage is given immediately before and for 24 hours after the procedure. Fever following the procedure is relatively common and may indicate drug effect or tumor lysis rather than infec­tion; however, a persistently elevated fever may indicate abscess formation and cross-sectional imaging of the liver should be performed. The imaging results must be inter­preted carefully because gas may be visualized in the tumor or parenchyma following embolization as a result of the injection of air trapped by the embolic particles themselves. Persistent or increased amounts of gas on follow-up imaging studies should increase the suspicion of infection.
REFERENCES
1. Van Allen RJ, Pentecost MJ. Transcatheter control of hemorrhage in the cancer patient. Semin Intervent Radiol 1992;9:38–44.
2. Ball ABS. Regional chemotherapy for colorectal hepatic metastases using degradable starch microspheres: a review. Acta Oncol 1991; 30:309–313.
3. Daniels JR, Kerlan RK, Dodds L et al. Peripheral hepatic arterial embolization with crosslinked collagen fibers. Invest Radiol 1987; 22:126–131.
4. Ichihara T, Sakamoto K, Mori K, et al. Transcatheter arterial che­moembolization therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using poly­lactic acid microspheres containing aclarubicin hydrochloride. Cancer Res 1989;49:4357–4362.
5. Kinoshita A, Yamada K, Ito M, et al. Ethylene vinylacetate copolym­erparticles dissolved polyvinyl alcohol (2,000-mer) solution as an embolic material for vascular anomalies:a preliminary study. Inter­vent Neuroradiol 1994;36:65–68.
6. Maton PN, Camilleri M. Griffin G, et al. Role of hepatic arterial embolisation in the carcinoid syndrome. BMJ 1983;287:932–935.
7. Okazaki M, Higashihara H, Ono H, etal. Embolotherapy of massive duodenal hemorrhage. Gastrointest Radiol 1992;17:319–323.
8. Lang E. Transcatheter embolization in management of hemor­rhage from duodenal ulcer: long-term results and complications. Radiology 1992;182:703–707.
9. Okazaki M, Furui S, Higashihara H, et al. Emergent embolotherapy of small intestine hemorrhage. Gastrointest Radiol 1992;17:223–
228.
10. Lang EV, Picus D, Marx MV, et al. Massive upper gastrointestinal
hemorrhage with normal findings on arteriography: value of pro­phylactic embolization of the left gastric arter y. AJR Am J Roent­genol 1992;158:547–549.
11. Kelemouridis V, Athanasoulis CA, Waltman AC. Gastric bleeding sites: an angiographic study. Radiology 1983;149:643–648.
12. Okazaki M, Higashihara H, Koganemaru F, et al. Emergent emboli­zation for control of massive hemorrhage from a splanchnic artery with a new coaxial catheter system. Acta Radiol 1992;33:57–62.
13. Zhang J, Cui Z, Wang M, et al. Bronchial arteriography and tran­scatheter embolization in the management of hemoptysis. Cardio­vasc Intervent Radiol 1994;17:276–279.
14. Mauro MA, Jaques PF, Morris S. Bronchial artery embolization for control of hemoptysis. Sem Intervent Radiol 1992;9:45–51.
15. Uflacker R, Kaemmerer A, Picon PD, et al. Bronchial artery emboli­zation in the management of hemoptysis: technical aspects and long term results. Radiology 1985;157:637–644.
16. Stoll JF, Bettman MA. Bronchial arter y embolization to control hemoptysis: a review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1988;11:263–269.
17. Keller FS. Embolization in the chest, abdomen and pelvis. In: Muel­ler PR, vanSonnenberg E, Becker GJ, eds. Syllabus: a diagnostic categorical course in inter ventional radiology, Oak Brook: Radio­logical Society of North America 1991:205–212.
18. Boushy SF, Helgason AH, North LB. Occlusion of the bronchial arteries by glass microspheres. Am Rev Respir Dis 1971;103:249–
263.
19. Feigelson HH, Ravin HA. Transverse myelitis following selective bronchial arteriography. Radiology 1965;85:663–665.
20. Keller FS, Rosch J, Loflin TG, et al. Non-bronchial systemic collat­eral arteries: significance in percutaneous embolotherapy for he­moptysis. Radiology 1987;164:687–692.
21. Cohen AM, Doershuk CF, Stein RC. Bronchial artery embolization to control hemoptysisin cysticfibrosis. Radiology 1990;175:401–405.
22. Ben-Menachem Y, Coldwell DM, Young JWR, et al. Hemorrhage associated with pelvic fractures: causes, diagnosis and emergent management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:1005–1014.
23. Katz MD, Teitelbaum GP, Pentecost MJ. Diagnostic arteriography and therapeutic transcatheter embolization for post-traumatic pel­vic hemorrhage. Semin Intervent Radiol 1992;9:4–12.
24. Ben-Menachem Y. Embolotherapy in trauma. In: Mueller Pr, van­Sonnenberg E, Becker GJ, eds. Syllabus: a categorical course in interventional radiology, Oak Brook: Radiological Society of North America, 1991:213–218.
25. Ben-Menachem Y, Handel SF, Ray RD, et al. Embolization proce­dures in trauma: the pelvis. Semin Inter vent Radiol 1985;2:158–
181.
26. Sclafani SJA, Weisberg A, Scalea TM, et al. Blunt splenic injuries: nonsurgical treatment with CT, arteriography, and transcatheter arterial embolization of the splenic artery. Radiology 1991;181:189–
196.
27. Chung JW, Park JH, Han JK, et al. Perforation of the gastroduode­nal arter y induced by steerable guidewires in two cases: treatment of hemorrhage by embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1994; 7:41–43.
28. Finn MC, Glowacki J, Mulliken JB. Congenital vascular lesions: clinical applications of a new classification. J Pediatr Surg 1983; 18:894–900.
29. Coldwell DM, Stokes KR, Yakes WF. Embolotherapy: agents, clinical applications, and techniques. Radiographics 1994;14:623–643.
30. Burrows PE, Fellows KE. Techniques for management of pediatric vascular anomalies. In: Cope C, ed. Current techniques in interven­tional radiology. Philadelphia: Current Medicine, 1995:11–28.
31. Yakes WF, Luethke JM, Parker SH, et al. Ethanol embolization of vascular malformations. Radiographics 1990;10:787–796.
32. Rao VRK, Mandalam KR, Gupta AK, et al. Dissolution of isobutyl
100 C. E. Ray Jr. and A. C. Waltman
https://t.me/med1917
2-cyanoacrylate on long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:135–141.
33. Gomes AS. Embolization therapy of congenital arteriovenous mal­formations: use of alternate approaches. Radiology 1994;190:191–
198.
34. Nakamura T, Isobe Y, Ueno E, et al. Successful arterial embolization of arteriovenous fistula in the portal circulation. Gastrointest Ra­diol 1992;17:324–326.
35. White RI, Lynch-Nyhan AL, Terry P, et al. Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: techniques and long-term outcome of embolo­therapy. Radiology 1988;169:663–669.
36. Hickman MP, Lucas D, Novak Z, et al. Preoperative embolization of the spleen in children with hypersplenism. J Vase Interv Radiol 1992;3:647–652.
37. Spigos DG, Jonasson O, Mozes M, et al. Partial splenic embolization in the treatment of hypersplenism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979;132: 777–782.
38. Kumpe DA. Partial splenic embolization in children with hyper­splenism. In: LaBerge JM, Durham JD, eds. Portal hypertension: options for diagnosis and treatment. San Francisco: Society of Car­diovascular and Interventional Radiology, 1995;205–226.
39. Borge MA, Jaques PF, Mauro M, et al. Percutaneous renal ablation in children with end-stage renal disease. J Vase Intervent Radiol 1992;3:467–474.
40. Casteneda-Zuniga WR, Hammerschmidt DE, Sanchez R, et al. Non­surgical splenectomy. Am J Roentgenol 1977;129:805–811.
41. Guilford WB, Scatliff JH. Transcatheter embolization of the spleen for control of splenic hemorrhage and in situ splenectomy: an ex­perimental study using silicone spheres. Radiology 1976;119: 549–
553.
42. Yoshika H, Kuroda C, Shinichi H, et al. Splenic embolization for hypersplenism using steel coils. Am J Roentgenol 1985;144:1269–
1274.
43. Brandt C, Rothbarth L, Kumpe D, et al. Splenic embolization in children: long-term efficacy. J Pediatr Surg 1989;24:642–645.
44. Macaulay SE. Internal mammary artery embolization for hepatic tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1995;18:20–24.
45. Marlink RG, Lokich JJ, Robins JR, et al. Hepatic arterial emboliza­tion for metastatic hormonesecreting tumors: technique, effective­ness, and complications. Cancer 1990;65:2227–2232.
46. Mitty HA, Warner RRP, Newman LH, et al. Control of carcinoid syndrome with hepatic artery embolization. Radiology 1985;155: 623–626.
47. Maton PN, Cannlleri M, Griffin G, et al. Role of hepatic arterial embolization in the carcinoid syndrome. BMJ 1983;287:932–935.
48. Chuang VP, Wallace S. Hepatic artery embolization in the treat­ment of hepatic neoplasms. Radiology 1981;140:51–58.
49. Tanaka K, Inoue S, Numata K, et al. Color Doppler sonography of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after treatment by tran­scatheter arterial embolization. AJR Am J Radiol 1992;158:541–546.
50. Lengle SJ, Hecht ST, Link DP, et al. Palliative embolization of fibrosarcoma for control of tumor-induced hypoglycemia. Cardio­vasc Intervent Radiol 1995;18:255–258.
51. Uflacker R. Arterial embolization as definitive treatment for benign insulinoma of the pancreas. J Vase Intervent Radiol 1992;3:639–
646.
52. Winkelbauer FW, Niederle B, Graf O, et al. Malignant insulinoma: permanent hepatic artery embolization of liver metastases—pre­liminary results. Cardiovasc Inter vent Radiol 1995;18:353–359.
53. Sigurdson ER, Ridge JA, Kemeny N, et al. Tumor and liver drug uptake following hepatic artery and portal vein infusion. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:1836–1840.
54. Pentecost MJ, Daniels JR, Teitelbaum GP, et al. Hepatic chemoem­bolization: safety with portal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Intervent Ra­diol 1993;4:347–351.
55. Lang EK, Brown CL. Colorectal metastases to the liver: selective chemoembolization. Radiology 1993;189:417–422.
56. Hatanaka Y, Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, et al. Unresectable hepato­cellular carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors in transcatheter management. Radiology 1995;195:747–752.
57. Bronowicki JP, Vetter D, Dumas F, et al. Transcatheter oily chemo­embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. A 4-year study of 127 French patients. Cancer 1994;74:16–24.
58. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Yoshikawa J, et al. Small hepatocellular carci­noma: treatment with subsegmental transcatheter arterial emboli­zation. Radiology 1993;188:79–83.
59. Bismuth H, Morino M, Sherlock D, et al. Primary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by arterial chemoembolization. Am J Surg 1992;163:387–393.
60. Nakao N, Kamino K, Miura K, et al. Recurrent hepatocellular car­cinoma after partial hepatectomy: value of treatment with tran­scatheter arterial chemoembolization. AJR Am J Roengenol 1991; 156:1177–1179.
61. Yu YQ, Xu DB, Zhou XD, et al. Experience with liver resection after hepatic arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 1993;71:62–65.
62. Katsumori T, Fujita M, Takahashi T, et al. Effective segmental che­moembolization of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus in the portal vein. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1995;18: 217–221.
63. Groupe D’Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hepatocellulaire. A comparison of lipiodol chemoembolization and conservative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1256–1261.
64. Nakagawa N, Cornelius AS, Kao SCS, et al. Transcatheter oily che­moembolization for unresectable malignant liver tumors in chil­dren. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1993;4:353–358.
65. Therasse E, Breittmayer F, Roche A, et al. Transcatheter chemoem­bolization of progressive carcinoid liver metastasis. Radiology 1993; 189:541–547.
66. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Koga Y, et al. Prognostic factors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with transcatheter arterial embolization and arterial infusion. Cancer 1991;67:385–391.
67. Clouse ME, Stokes KR, Kruskal JB, et al. Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: epinephrine followed by a doxorubicin­ethiodized oil emulsion and gelatin sponge powder. J Vasc Inter­vent Radiol 1993;4:717–725.
68. Perry LJ, Stuart K, Stokes KR, et al. Hepatic arterial chemoemboli­zation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery 1994;116: 1111–1115.
69. Ruszniewski P, Rougier P, Roche A, et al. Hepatic arterial chemoem­bolization in patients with liver metastases of endocrine tumors: a prospective phase II study in 24 patients. Cancer 1993;71:2624–
2630.
70. Carrasco CH, Charnsangavey C, Ajani J, et al. The carcinoid syn­drome: palliation by hepatic artery embolization. AJR Am T Radiol 1986;147:149–154.
71. Feun LG, Reddy KR, ?? JM, et al. A phase 1 study of chemoemboli­zation with cisplatin and lipiodol for primary and metastatic liver cancer. Am J Clin Oneal 1994;17:405–410.
72. Martinelli DJ, Wadler S, Bakal CW, et al. Utility of embolization orche
moembolization
vanced or recurrent colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1994;1706–1712.
73. Reed RA, Teitelbaum G, Daniels JR, et al. Prevalence of infection following hepatic chemoembolization with cross-linked collagen with administration of prophylaclic antibiotics. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1994;5:367–371.
as second-line treatment in patients with ad-
T. J.DiBartholomeo and C. W. BakalOrganAcc ess Techniques
https://t.me/med1917
9
■■■
Organ Access Techniques
General Principles for Localization, Drainage, and Stenting
THOMAS J. DIBARTHOLOMEO AND CURTIS W. BAKAL
Percutaneous techniques for localization, drainage, and stent placement are now routine, daily procedures in the interventional radiology suite. Utilization of multiple im­aging modalities allows access to almost all organs and body compartments. The goal of this chapter is to de­scribe the general principles of localizing and accessing a target organ for draining collections and for stenting obstructive lesions.
Virtually any organ or body cavity can be accessed from a percutaneous route. It is essential to avoid traversing pleura, bowel, and major vascular structures en route to the target. On occasion, however, the stomach may be used as a pathway or ultimate drainage site for pancreatic collections. In addition to direct, percutaneous access, the liver can be biopsied via the hepatic veins. If neces­sary, some solid organs, for example, the liver and kidney, may be traversed during percutaneous biopsies, aspira­tion for diagnosis, or drainage.
■ Imaging Modalities Used for Localization
All radiographic and imaging modalities may be used for accurate localization of the target. A careful review of relevant preprocedure images should be made. This is necessary to select the optimal imaging modality for the procedure, plan the route of access, and determine ma­terial requirements for the procedure.
On plain films, some landmarks are especially helpful and will aid the subsequent fluoroscopic access. A collec­tion may be identified by amorphous-appearing gas.Renal shadows sometimes are seen, especially in the hydroneph­rotic, enlarged kidney. Renal calculi aid greatly in localiza-
tion of the kidney. Contrast material may be administered intravenously to opacifythe renalcollecting systemif renal function allows. Dilatation of the gallbladder frequently occurs with biliary tract obstruction. The gallbladder shadow occasionally is seen, assisting in localization dur­ing percutaneous cholecystostomy. Patients who are postcholecystectomy frequently have surgical clips, which localize the gallbladder bed.
Under real-time fluoroscopic guidance, the needle, catheter, or guidewire can be visualized directly, which permits immediate redirection of the catheter or guidewire when its course deviates from the desired ap­proach. A damaged catheter or wire can be exchanged immediately.
The benefits of fluoroscopic guidance tend to result in an expedient procedure. The disadvantages include rela­tively poor contrast resolution. Often the target cannot be seen readily, which may necessitate additional localiza­tion punctures. Also, vital structures (e.g., blood vessels) in the anticipated course may not be readily apparent. Thus, it is often helpful to do a cross-sectional image [usually computed tomography (CT)] before a fluoro­scopically guided procedure. patient cooperation (i.e., breathhold for limited mo­tion). There is also radiation exposure to the patient and physician, although this can be minimized by proper technique.
Ultrasound (US) has increasingly become an ex­tremely useful modality for target localization. In some practices, it has become a primary guidance modality for organ localization. US offers real-time imaging, with po­tentially excellent tissue contrast for both localization and needle/catheter tract identification. US is often used
1
Real-time imaging requires
101
102
https://t.me/med1917
T. J. DiBartholomeo and C. W. Bakal
in combination with fluoroscopy. For example, during percutaneous nephrostomy, after localizing puncture with US, aspiration of about 5 mL of urine is performed, and the needle is injected with an equal amount of con­trast to opacify the system for subsequent fluoroscopic guidance.
1
US optimally requires specialized needles, guidewires, and catheters that are sufficiently echogenic for proper visualization. It is usually cost-effective but is highly operator and patient dependent.
Computed tomography (CT) is an extremely useful modality because it provides excellent tissue contrast. CT provides clear visualization of the course of the antici­pated needle tract and will demonstrate any intervening structures that might preclude placement of the desired drainage catheter.
2,3
The target lesion or anatomic struc­ture is shown clearly on CT. The disadvantages include lack of real-time monitoring and delays to check the progress of needle placement by repeated scanning. Pa­tient cooperation is a necessity because variations in breathing or breath-holding can result in large variability in needle placement. CT is a more expensive guidance technology than fluoroscopy or US. With the advent of fast CT scans, procedures can be done more expedi­tiously, although not in real time.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also provides ex­cellent tissue contrast, imaging in any plane required for diagnosis, and visualization of the needle/catheter tract; however, specialized instruments that are nonferromag­netic are required. Conventional MRI does not offer real­time imaging and is presently the most expensive guid­ance modality. Its primary interventional use is in neuroradiologic procedures. Real-time MRI “fluoros­copy” is in early development.
■ Goal of Access
Percutaneous access to an organ, abscess cavity, or in­fected or obstructed anatomic pathway can be per­formed for biopsy, as described elsewhere in this book. Aspiration of a fluid collection may be performed for diagnosis (i.e., culture and sensitivity) or for therapeutic drainage. In less frequent circumstances, a cavity or pseudocyst can be sclerosed by alcohol or other agents to facilitate its closure. Urinary and biliary tract obstruc­tions can be relieved by diverting the path of urine or bile into an external drainage bag (e.g., biliary drainage) or by crossing the site of obstruction and reestablishing the normal antegrade anatomic pathway (e.g., biliary stenting).
Obstructions are typically caused by calculi, tumor, or inflammation. Calculi are frequently the cause of urinary tract obstruction and can result in compromised function of the affected kidney and infection of the stagnant urine. Therefore, rapid relief of urinary tract obstruction is im-
portant. The therapeutic drainage procedure is termed percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement. Tumor is also a fre­quent cause of obstruction in the urinary tract and biliary tree. Primary urinary bladder or ureteral tumors (usually transitional cell) as well as primary pelvic malignancies or metastases are additional causes of urinary tract obstruc­tion that require nephrostomy. Ureteral stent placement can be performed percutaneously, but cystoscopic retro­grade stent placement usually is attempted first because it is less invasive than the percutaneous procedure. Percu­taneous nephrostomy or ureteral stenting frequently is performed when the tumor causing the obstruction is inoperable or is radiosensitive. The ureter frequently re­sponds to radiation therapy with stricture formation. Therefore, a ureteral stent can be placed prophylactically or when a stricture becomes symptomatic. Other causes of stricture include postoperative injury, ischemia, or pas­sage of ureteral calculi. Percutaneous nephrostomy also is indicated for bladder dysfunction, colovesicular or col­oureteral fistulae, or bladder leaks of any cause. Urinary diversion by nephrostomy drainage or stenting across a ureteral tear may be used to aid healing.
4
The most common cause of biliary obstruction in the United States is carcinoma of the pancreatic head. Other causes include primary bile duct tumors, bile duct stones, and postoperative injury. Biliary obstruction that results in pruritis or sepsis requires decompression of the biliary tree. A temporary stent is used before a planned opera­tive procedure is done or if resolution of the bile duct obstruction is expected. Typically, permanent stent place­ment is reserved for inoperable carcinomas. Often a di­agnostic cholangiogram and stenting can be performed in one sitting. It is sometimes helpful to perform a Gram stain to determine immediately whether a cavity is in­fected if this is not readily clinically apparent. If positive, the original puncture then may be used immediately for placement of a drainage catheter.
■ Materials
Needles
Although a large number and type of needles are avail­able for aspiration and biopsy, only a limited number are used for organ access and catheter placement. The prototype is the Chiba needle, a type of aspiration biopsy needle. The Chiba needle is available in multiple gauge sizes, although the 21- or 22-gauge “skinny” needles are used most frequently. If inadvertent nontarget or vascular puncture occurs or if multiple passes are needed, this small gauge is relatively atraumatic. Chiba needles range in length from 10 to 20/cm. The needle tip is beveled at 25 degrees. Originally designed to obtain cytologic or bacteriologic samples, skinny needles are
used increasingly to access visceral organs for drainage
https://t.me/med1917
and stenting. (Needles with a greater ability to cut typi­cally are used for biopsy; these are available from a wide variety of manufacturers and are typically “gun”-type spring-loaded devices.) For organ access, skinny needles are used for atraumatic access to the target, for example, the biliary tree or intrarenal collecting system. The initial skinny needle approach is completed with contrast opacification of the target for localization and diagnosis. Vendor-specific skinny needles are also incorporated as the initial components of “one-stick” systems used for upsizing the initial puncture site to allow for drainage or stenting.
Access to the kidney and biliary trees which are deep, vascular organs, as well as to many more superficial tar­gets, is typically done with the Seldinger technique; that is, a needle is first placed into the target and exchanged over a guidewire for the drainage catheter. Intermediate dilatation of the track is usually needed. Traditionally, 18- or 19-gauge, 15-cm long, hollow-core needles were used with exchange over a 0.035-inch to 0.038-inch stiff working wire (Rosen or Amplatz type). Many interven­tional radiologists now prefer “one-stick” systems that al­low relatively atraumatic localization with a 21-gauge nee­dle and 0.18-inch wire, with subsequent exchange for a triple coaxial dilator that will accommodate a 0.035-inch or 0.038-inch working wire. (After this wire is placed, the track can be dilated to accommodate a standard 8Fr to 12Fr catheter) (Fig. 9-1). An additional drainage-type catheter is the single-stick trocar. This catheter is loaded coaxially over a sharp tipped, stiffening needle/cannula and is inserted directly through a small dermatotomy into the target site. The catheter is advanced (payed off) into the target, and the sharp-tipped inner trochar is removed, leaving the drainage catheter in place (Fig. 9-2). These devices offer the advantage of limited ma­nipulation and speed of insertions, but they must be used only when a simple, clear path to the target site from the skin is available. The trocar catheter is used only after a commitment to therapy via an indwelling drainage catheter already has been made; it is in­appropriate to use this device for simple diagnostic as­piration.
Catheters
Standard directional angiographic catheters and guidewires are used for providing steerability, maneu­verability, and pushability while attempting to negotiate anatomy, for example, through a stricture, or down a branch duct. Drainage catheters differ from angio­graphic flush pigtail catheters and are generally large­bore (8Fr to 12Fr) to expedite flow of tenacious mate­rial. They have distal configurations (i.e., pigtail), which are larger than the catheter diameter to help secure
Organ Access Techniques
sd
gw
A
FIGURE 9-1. One-stick technique. A: Skinny needle (21
left
gauge). After entering target, the stylet ( allow passage of an 0.018 inch stiff mandrel guidewire into the target. B: Coaxial dilator set. The 0.018-inch guidewire (gw) can support passage of a triple coaxial dilator, which is passed as a unit. The metal stiffener and inner dilator (sd) are re­moved; the outer dilator (D) is left in place, allowing passage of a stiff 0.035-inch or 0.038-inch guidewire, used to support passage of the final catheter or drain (Cook, Inc., Bloomington, IN, U.S.A.).
) is removed to
103
D
the catheter. Self-locking mechanisms have been de­signed to minimize dislodgement.
5
A drainage catheter has multiple large side holes placed along the distal as­pect of the catheter, typically on the inside surface of the pigtail only and not extending up the catheter shaft (Fig. 9-2). This circumscribed drainage area ensures that drainage holes are placed only within the target collec­tion, cavity, or organ. Side-hole location exclusively on the inner surface allows continued function as the target shrinks down to abut the outer surface of the pigtail. Furthermore, the circumscribed location of holes within the pigtail contains drainage to the target and decreases the likelihood of leakage back along the track. Side holes in the track would allow leakage of material into the track or subcutaneous tissues, leading to infection and wound breakdown. The drainage holes of abscess drainage catheters are large to permit the egress of thick, purulent material. The holes of nephrostomy catheters may be of only moderate size, allowing drain-
B