Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3860_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
A
https://t.me/med1917
B
FIGURE 16-1. Type I dissection of the aorta in a 74-year-old
man. The dynamic spiral computed tomography (CT) shows the characteristic flap in a type I dissection involving the ascending aorta (A) and the proximal aortic arch (B). The brachiocephalic vessels were not involved. Calcification of the wall of the aorta is noted. Transesophageal echocardio­gram in a different patient with a type I dissection showing the flap in the descending aorta (C). On the real-time image, the flap oscillates in the lumen of aorta. The true lumen is closest to the transducer and the false lumen is farther away. The echogenicity beyond the aorta represents extravasated blood
C
in the mediastinum.
A B
Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta 165
https://t.me/med1917
atherosclerosis, trauma, syphilis, idiopathic kyphosco­liosis, and congenital heart defects, such as coarctation and pseudocoarctation of the aorta. Approximately 2,000 new cases of aortic dissection are diagnosed each year in the United States.
3,4
The male-to-female ratio is approxi­mately 2:1, with a peak incidence in the sixth and seventh decades of life.
Two major classifications of aortic dissection are widely used. The older classification, introduced by DeBakey et al., divides aortic dissections into type I, which includes those involving the ascending and descending aorta (Fig. 16-1); type II, which involves the ascending aorta only; and type III, which involves the descending aorta (Fig.
5
16-4).
A mnemonic for this classification is “BAD”: type I ⫽ both aortas, type II ⫽ ascending aorta and type III ⫽ descending aorta. Another classification, introduced by Dailey et al., and often called the Stanford classification, divides aortic dissection into two groups. Dailey’s type A includes proximal dissections as well as those distal dissec­tions that extend retrograde to involve the arch and as­cending aorta. Type B includes dissections of the distal aorta without proximal extension.
6
Important variants of aortic dissection are caused by penetrating ulcers and by intramural hemorrhage (IMH) (Fig. 16-5).
7
Penetrating ulcers result from erosion of
atherosclerotic plaque with eventual violation of the inter-
A
nal elastic lamina.
8
Penetrating ulcers occur most often in persons who have extensive atherosclerotic disease, but not in persons with Marfan syndrome or other diseases of connective tissue. Ulcers affect the mid-portion to distal portion of the descending thoracic aorta almost exclu­sively and do not result in valvular, pericardial, or neurovascular complications that occur with aortic dissec­tion. The ulcer has a nipple-like configuration extending
B
FIGURE 16-2. Findings on chest roentgenography in a man with Marfan syndrome. A: Frontal view. B: Lateral view. Marked
dilatation of the root of the aorta produces a double density within the cardiac silhouette (pseudo left atrial enlargement). The normal angle formed between the ascending aorta and the base of the heart is effaced by the dilated ascending aorta. The aorta also displaces the main pulmonary artery superiorly and laterally, producing a bulge in the pulmonary artery segment simulating pulmonary artery dilatation. In the lateral film, the dilated aortic root obliterates the retrosternal clear space. Thus, the lateral film shows that the double density noted on the frontal view is due to the dilatation of the aortic root rather than enlargement of the left atrium. Note that the dilatation of the root of the aorta does not extend into the aortic arch. Mild left ventricular enlargement is present (same patient as in Fig. 16-3). (Courtesy of Spindola-Franco H, Fish BG, eds. Radiology of the heart: cardiac imaging in infants, children, and adults. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985:203.)
FIGURE 16-3. Aortic insufficiency in an asymptomatic pa­tient with Marfan syndrome. The aortogram. A: Lateral view. B: Shallow left anterior oblique (LAO) view shows that the root of the aorta is dilated symmetrically and bulbous, with effacement of the semilunar sinuses. Aortic insufficiency is present. In (B)a
arrows
tear is demonstrated in the anterolateral wall ( was not detected on the lateral film, which emphasizes the requirement to look carefully for tears, using multiple views as necessary. This example is a “silent aortic dissection” (same patient as in Fig. 16-2). (Courtesy of Spindola-Franco H, Fish BG, eds. Radiology of the heart: cardiac imaging in infants, children, and adults. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985:204.)
). The tear
166 H. Spindola-Franco, S. Segal, B. G. Fish, and M. A. Greenberg
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 16-4. Complications of DeBakey type III aortic dis­section in a patient who presented with acute abdominal pain. The left anterior oblique (LAO) plane of a T1-weighted spin­echo image shows two flaps distal to the left subclavian artery. One false lumen is confined to the distal aortic arch and proxi­mal descending aorta. The other extends into the abdomen, compromising the superior mesenteric artery ( mia of the gut caused acute abdominal pain in this patient. Angiography was not successful because the catheter could not be advanced into the lumen of the aorta.
arrow
). Ische-
beyond the intima and is surrounded by hematoma. The process may be contained spontaneously or may progress to false aneurysm formation or aortic rupture (Fig. 16-6).
IMH may result from rupture of aortic vasa vasorum. IMH differs from classic dissection in that hematoma forms within the aortic wall, but an intimal tear is not present.
10,11
Intramural hemorrhage may be the first
stage in the development of aortic dissection, the second
FIGURE 16-5. Angiogram and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a patient with intramural hemorrhage (IMH). A: Sub­traction film from the left anterior oblique (LAO) view of an aortogram. B: T1-weighted spin-echo pulse sequence MRI in the sagittal plane. In (A) the aortic lumen is normal with no intimal flap or leakage, whereas in (B) the high signal intensity and increased thickness of the aortic wall indicate intramural hemorrhage. The increased signal intensity indicates a sub­acute process. Acute hemorrhage would be isointense and may not be separated from the wall of the aorta. Blood isalso present in the mediastinum, considered a typical feature of IMH.
A
9
B
Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta 167
https://t.me/med1917
A B
C
stage being an intimal tear that allows blood to flow into the false lumen, extending the plane of dissection. Complications of IMH are the same as with aortic dissec­tion, but they are significantly less common with IMH than with aortic dissection.
Clinical features
Aortic dissection often presents with severe chest pain (anterior or posterior) with a tearing character. Pain is maximal atonset and changes inlocation as the dissection propagates. Painless (“silent”) dissection is rare (Fig. 16-
3). Acute complications include aortic insufficiency and congestive heart failure. Aortic insufficiency occurs in up to 50% of patients who undergo type A dissection secon­dary to either wideningor distortion of the aortic annulus, causing failure of coaptation of the valve leaflets, or torn leaflets. Congestive heart failure may result from sudden onset of severe aortic insufficiency. Syncope as a present-
FIGURE 16-6. Acute perforation of an atherosclerotic ulcer in a 54­year-old man with sudden onset of severe chest pain. Frames from a dynamic spiral CT scan. A: The lowest slice, the ascending aorta is dilated, but no dissection is noted. B: 1 cm higher, a jet of contrast exits the aortic lumen into the mediastinum. C: 1 cm above (B), a collection of contrast is noted just under the aortic arch. The surrounding fat is dense (“dirty fat sign”), indicating infiltration with blood. These findings are consistent with rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque. Soon after the scan, the patient became more unstable and was taken to the operating room. At surgery, an aortic dissection and a hemopericardium were found, indicating that propagation of the pathologic process had oc­curred, accounting for the sudden deterioration after the scan.
ing symptom may be associated with rupture into the peri-
12
cardial cavity and cardiac tamponade. Physical findings with aortic dissection include shock with normal to ele­vated blood pressure and pseudohypotension or pulse deficits secondary todissection of the brachiocephalic ves­sels. Myocardial infarction occurs in a small percentage of patients with proximal dissection, secondary to involve­ment of the coronary arteries. Neurological findings and renal and mesenteric infarctions occuras a result of occlu­sion of related vessels. Leftventricular hypertrophyis com­monly noted on electrocardiography. Aortic dissection should be suspected in patients with chest pain and no electrocardiographic signs of myocardial ischemia.
Imaging modalities
On chest roentgenography, the characteristic findings of aortic dissection are a widened aortic contour and a “cal­cium sign” consisting of a greater than 5 mm separation
168
https://t.me/med1917
H. Spindola-Franco, S. Segal, B. G. Fish, and M. A. Greenberg
of the calcification of the aortic arch from its outer con­tour. A left pleural effusion may be present, indicating leakage into the pleural space. The trachea may be devi­ated. Importantly, the chest roentgenogram may be nor­mal in aortic dissection.
TEE (Fig. 16-1) and MRI are both very sensitive in the diagnosis of aortic dissection.
13,14
Advantages of TEE in­clude the availability of this modality at the bedside, ena­bling diagnosis in acutely unstable patients. TEE is useful in proximal and distal dissections. A disadvantage is its inability to delineate the branches of the aortic arch accurately. In addition, TEE is an invasive procedure.
If available, MRI is the procedure of choice in persons with aortic dissection who are relatively stable and can tolerate a longer procedure (Fig. 16-4). The advantages of MRI include its ability to determine the exact extent and site of origin of the dissection and its anatomic rela­tionships with neighboring organs. MRI also allows the diagnosis of associated aortic insufficiency and leakage. By using MRI, thrombus or flow in the false lumen can be detected. Cine MRI allows visualization of the oscillations of the flap separating the false lumen from the true lumen, which is a hallmark of aortic dissection.
Spiral and ultrafast CT are extremely useful in the acute assessment of aortic dissection when MRI is not available or when the patient cannot tolerate the time required by the MRI examination (Fig. 16-1). Ultrafast CT is available in only a few centers, whereas spiral CT has replaced standard CT in many centers and often is staffed through the night. The shorter time taken to perform a CT study compared with the time taken by MRI should be weighed against the radiation exposure involved and the requirement to administer angiog­raphic contrast medium. One limitation of CT relates to difficulty in timing the injection to enhance the false lumen.
MRI, spiral CT, TEE, and angiography are all comple­mentary, and each has an ability to identify aortic dissec­tion; however, angiography cannot detect IMH (Fig. 16-
15
5).
Atherosclerotic ulcers are detected by angiography, but the hematoma surrounding a penetrating ulcer may be missed. For this reason, angiography is not the pri­mary diagnostic modality for these entities but should be used when the others are not definitive.
Treatment
Without treatment, aortic dissection is a lethal disease. Death occurs as a result of progression of the dissection, which causes damage to vital structures. Ninety percent of untreated patients die within one year, with the highest mortality occurring during the first week after the on-
16
set.
Initial treatment for all patients includes beta-block­ers and aggressive control of hypertension to prevent progression. Proximal dissections are surgically repaired
early or even emergently because of the risk of catastro­phic consequences such as acute aortic insufficiency, car­diac tamponade, and neurologic complications with even minimal progression. On the other hand, distal dissec­tions may be treated medically unless they show signs of rupture, impending rupture, or renal or mesenteric com­promise. Chronic dissections, which present 2 weeks or longer after onset, also may be treated medically because they already have passed the most dangerous period, suggesting a nonlethal outcome. Surgery of proximal dissections commonly consists of placement of a compos­ite graft containing a prosthetic valve. The native ascend­ing aorta is wrapped around the graft. The coronary arteries are reimplanted using a button of native aorta to facilitate the anastomosis. Conduit grafts also may be used to replace the aortic arch and descending aorta.
Recently interventional procedures have become avail­able as alternatives to surgery for dissections in the de­scending aorta.
17–19
Placement of a self-expandable cov­ered stent (Gianturco stent) to cover the proximal entry site reestablishes the true lumen by compressing the false lumen so that thrombosis of the residual false lumen is promoted. The catheter is inserted by way of the femoral artery into the true lumen, and the intraluminal prosthe­sis is deployed slightly proximal to the entry site of the dissection. The diameter of the device should be slightly larger than the aortic diameter to prevent migration. Another treatment option currently being explored is the percutaneous creation of a reentry tear in an aortic dis­section, which decompresses the false lumen of a dissec­tion, thereby limiting its progression.
20
Long-term follow-up is necessary for patients treated medically and surgically. Blood pressure must be control­led at the lowest level tolerated. Follow-up chest roent­genograms are essential to detect changes that suggest late complications such as false aneurysms and leakage into the pleural space. Serial imaging studies are also essential to detect complications or progression. Cur­rently, MRI is considered the procedure of choice.
21
■ Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms
Aneurysms of the thoracic aorta are localized, sac-like dilatations of the aortic wall. All layers of the aortic wall are involved. They may be saccular, in which only part of the circumference is involved, or fusiform, if all or almost all of the circumference is involved. Fusiform aneurysms are four times more common than saccular aneurysms, which are found chiefly in the ascending aorta.
Aneurysms may be congenital or acquired. Congenital aneurysms are rare and mostly affect the sinuses of Val­salva. Causes of acquired thoracic aortic aneurysms in­clude atherosclerosis, syphilis, trauma, cystic medial ne­crosis, arteritis, and infection (mycotic). Atherosclerotic
Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta 169
https://t.me/med1917
aneurysms are the most common, and their incidence is increasing as a consequence of increasing longevity of the population. They are more common beyond the aortic arch. Syphilitic (luetic) aneurysms are most common in the ascending aorta. Posttraumatic aneurysms occur in a small number of persons who survive chest trauma. These are found mainly in the most proximal portion of the descending aorta, resulting from a small tear. Mycotic aneurysms, also called infected aneurysms, are rare and are caused by sepsis in the wall of the aorta or any vessel. Infection can cause fusiform, saccular, or even false aneu­rysms. They can perforate into adjacent venous struc­tures, resulting in arteriovenous fistulae.
Annuloaortic ectasia is a specific subgroup of aortic aneurysm affecting the root of the aorta and the aortic annulus (Figs. 16-2 and 16-3). This entity is typical of Marfan syndrome and other conditions associated with cystic medial necrosis. Persons with annuloaortic ectasia should be investigated for other stigmata of Marfan syn­drome. The ectasia is often progressive, leading to aortic insufficiency, congestive heart failure, dissection and rup­ture of the ascending aorta, sometimes resulting in sud­den death. A diameter greater than 7 cm is associated with a high incidence of aortic dissection, and usually this measurement in itself constitutes sufficient grounds for replacement of the aortic root and the aortic valve with a valved conduit. The coronary arteries are reimplanted into the conduit. Cystic medial necrosis with dilatation of the aortic root also occurs in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, homocysteinuria, Larsen syn­drome, and Cogan syndrome.
Clinical features
Presenting features relate to the size and location of the aneur ysm. Small aneurysms may be asymptomatic whereas large aneurysms produce symptoms by directly compressing adjacent structures. Wheezing, cough, dysp­nea, stridor, hemoptysis, recurrent pneumonitis, intrapul­monary hemorrhage, and superior vena cava syndrome all may result from large thoracic aneurysms. As with aor­tic dissection, acute aortic insufficiency may result in acute congestive heart failure. Collapse and sudden death may be caused by rupture of an aortic aneurysm. Most patients, however, die of associated disease unrelated to the aneurysms (e.g., coronary artery disease). Patients with mycotic aneurysms have other signs of infection, such as high fever. Other features that differentiate myco­tic aneurysms from uninfected aneurysms include ten­derness, lack of calcification, and early vertebral erosion.
bulge (Fig. 16-7). The differential diagnosis includes an uncoiled aorta (atherosclerotic elongated aorta), kinking or buckling of the aorta (pseudocoarctation), and poststenotic dilatation (aortic stenosis). A localized aneurysm may be confused with a mediastinal mass. Calcification occurs much less commonly in thoracic aneurysms than in aneu­rysms involving the abdominal aorta.
Axial or spiral CT, MRI, TEE, and angiography are all definitive in the diagnosis of aneurysms of the thoracic aorta. If available and not contraindicated (e.g., pace­maker, hemodynamic instability), MRI is the procedure of choice. No radiation is involved, and no intravenous contrast needs to be administered.
Treatment
Survival is related to the size of the aneurysm. Aneurysms larger than 6 to 7 cm in diameter and those causing symptoms by compression are more likely to rupture than smaller ones. Surgical excision is indicated in aneu­rysms greater than 7 cm in the ascending or descending aorta and in smaller aneurysms if they produce symp­toms.
■ Aortic Trauma
Injuries to the thoracic aorta may be blunt or penetrating. Blunt trauma may be associated with a sudden high-speed deceleration on impact, such as a motor vehicle accident or severe fall or explosion. Abrupt deceleration creates shearing forces ata point where a highly mobile portion of the aorta joins a relatively fixed segment. The most com­mon site is the aortic isthmus (the portion of the aorta between the left subclavian artery and the ligamentum arteriosum), which is attached to the relatively fixed seg­ment at the site of insertion of the ligamentum arterio­sum. The secondmost frequent site is the ascending aorta, just above theaortic valve. Tears of the ascending aorta are associated withsignificantly higher mortality than those in the isthmic region. Recently, an “osseous pinch mecha­nism” was described in which the spine and man­ubrium/clavicle/first rib may play a role during acute de­celeration injury. interventions such as cardiac catheterization or balloon dilatation of coarctation of the aorta. The tear of the aorta may be small, resulting in a localized aneurysm or false aneurysm, or it may be circumferential, resulting in tran­section of the aorta.
22
Aortic trauma also may result from
Imaging modalities
Most aneurysms are easily detectable on chest roentgeno­graphy, appearing as a dilated aorta or as a localized
Clinical features
A high index of suspicion is needed because severe inju­ries of the central nervous system, visceral injury, and multiple fractures may overshadow the diagnosis. The
170 H. Spindola-Franco, S. Segal, B. G. Fish, and M. A. Greenberg
https://t.me/med1917
A B
FIGURE 16-7. Aneurysmal dilatation of the aorta
in a 67-year-old man noted on chest roentgeno­gram. A: Frontal. B: Lateral. The magnetic reso­nance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scan showed no dissection. C: The aorto- gram in the left anterior oblique (LAO) view was performed at the time of coronary angiography. The ascending aorta measures 5 cm above the sinotubular junction. The coronary ostia are unob­structed. Mild aortic insufficiency was noted. The aortic arch and descending aorta also were aneu­rysmally dilated (not shown). The patient was
C
syndrome of “acute coarctation” (upper-extremity hyper­tension, low pressure in the lower extremities, systolic
noted. An aortic insufficiency murmur is heard with sig­nificant tears of the ascending aorta.
monitored medically.
murmur over the precordium or in the interscapular region, and a palpable radial-femoral pulse lag) is diag­nostic. Other signs of aortic trauma include hoarseness, cough, or dysphagia from compression of the adjacent recurrent laryngeal nerve, trachea, or esophagus. Addi­tionally, swelling of the lower neck and paraplegia may be
Imaging modalities
The roentgenogram of the chest is essential in the diag­nosis of trauma even in the absence of classic clinical features. Signs include a widened mediastinum, oblitera-
Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta 171
https://t.me/med1917
tion of the aortic arch (knob), a rightward tracheal shift, depression of the left mainstem bronchus, displacement of the nasogastric tube to the right, displacement of the right or left paraspinal line, and opacification of the space between the descending aorta and the pulmonary
23
artery.
A pleural effusion, especially one that obliterates
the left thoracic apex (apical cap sign) is an important
24
sign.
An aortic transection also can occur in the absence of these signs. The portable technique and other factors occuring during the course of acute trauma may obscure the findings. Bone fractures, pulmonary contusion, pneumothorax, and pneumoperitonium indicate severe thoracic trauma, and should result in a suspicion of aortic trauma.
Despite the advent of sophisticated noninvasive imag­ing modalities such as spiral CT and MRI, angiography remains the diagnostic procedure of choice when aortic transection is suspected. MRI can provide a complete diagnosis in patients with aortic trauma, but it requires a lengthy procedure and may not be practical for critically ill patients who are instrumented with multiple invasive monitoring and life support devices. High-speed CT may be a useful primary imaging modality. Abdominal CT can be performed concurrently. Associated hemorrhage and hematoma, which might be missed by both chest roent­genography and angiography, may be detected by CT scanning or MRI. It is important to note that traumatic rupture of the aorta can be missed on CT scanning unless a linear lucency inside the aortic lumen caused by the torn edge of the aortic wall is noted or a dissection is present. Irregularity of the intima of the opacified aortic lumen and periaortic or intraluminal hematoma are other confirmatory findings on CT scanning, but these may not be diagnostic. Mediastinal hematoma usually is caused by tearing of small vessels, which requires no treatment. Immediate angiography with digital subtrac­tion should follow if the CT scan is not definitive and the patient is stable. If a patient cannot be moved, TEE may be performed at the bedside to exclude transection of the aorta. In the future, intravascular ultrasound may play an important role.
25,26
Treatment
Surgery should be performed as soon as possible once aortic transection is diagnosed. The repair consists of resection of the torn edges and interposition of a graft. The distal circulation may be supported by a pump oxy­generator or by a conduit bypass. Late sequelae include aneurysms that may require secondary surgical excision to prevent dissection and rupture. Early animal trials that may lead to the replacement of surgical treatment using covered endovascular stents in selected subjects are ongo-
27
ing.
■ Penetrating trauma
Penetrating trauma to the aorta and its branches is caused by puncture or laceration, most commonly a result of a bullet or stab wound. These are likely to cause acute exsan­guination and require immediate surgical exploration with or without the findings on chest roentgenography of a widened mediastinum, pleural effusions, and cardio­megaly (hemopericardium). Although signs of acute penetrating trauma may be obtained by angiography or by CT scanning, these patients are usually too unstable to allow these studies.
■ Aortic Arteritis Syndromes
Aortitis is caused by an infectious or immunologic process that affects any layer of the wall of the aorta. Aortitis may manifest as aneurysmal dilatation (ectasia) or as segmen­tal narrowing. The aneurysmal form is more common, and fusiform aneurysms are more common than saccular ones. Conditions that result in ectasia of the ascending aorta frequently cause aortic insufficiency. These condi­tions include Takayasu’s arteritis, giant cell arteritis, syphi­lis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, relapsing polychondritis, and Reiter syndrome. Stenosing aortitis occurs in a few condi­tions, including Takayasu’s arteritis and radiation aortitis. In most inflammatory diseases of the aorta, the media is primarily involved, with occasional damage to the adven­titia. Thickening of the intima is a reactive phenomenon. Rheumatic fever and rheumatoid arthritis cause an in­flammatory reaction and fibrinoid necrosis of all three layers of the aorta, resulting in a true panaortitis.
28
Takayasu’s arteritis is a syndrome caused by a panarteri­tis and leads to narrowing and occlusion of the aorta and its branches. Less commonly, the coronary ostia may be involved. Localized areas of dilatation also mayoccur (Fig. 16-8). This syndrome usually occurs in young women, oc­casionally in children, and rarely in infants and middle­aged individuals. The female-to-male ratio is 8.5:1, peak­ing in the teenage years.
The syndrome has been classified into four subtypes according to the site of involvement. Type I (8%) involves the aortic arch and brachiocephalic vessels. Type II (11%) affects the thoracoabdominal aorta, especially the renal arteries. Type III (65%) combines the features of both types I and II. Type IV (45%) includes characteristics of the first three types along with involvement of the pulmo­nary arteries.
29
Clinically, there are two recognized phases of the syn­drome. The early, or systemic phase, is characterized by the signs and symptoms of a generalized inflammatory process, such as fever, anorexia, malaise, weight loss, night
172 H. Spindola-Franco, S. Segal, B. G. Fish, and M. A. Greenberg
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 16-8. Abdominal aortogram in a 6-year-old girl with Takayasu arteritis and severe systemic hypertension. Marked aneurysmal dilatation of the abdominal aorta is noted with minimal narrowing of the right and severe narrowing of the left common iliac artery. Similar changes were found in the tho­racic aorta on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
sweats, arthralgias, pleuritic pain, and fatigue. This phase generally lasts from weeks to months and is followed by the occlusive features of the late phase, which include diminished or absent pulses (96%), bruits (94%), hyper­tension (74%), and congestive heart failure (28%). An­gina or myocardial infarction may occur if coronary arter­ies are involved.
30
The etiology of Takayasu’s arteritis is probably autoim­mune, although no specific cause has been identified. Laboratory studies in the early phase are consistent with an autoimmune etiology but are nonspecific and include elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, low-grade leuk­ocytosis, and mild anemia.
Imaging modalities
In the early phase, the chest roentgenogram is frequently normal. In the late phase, nonspecific findings such as cardiomegaly and congestive heart failure may be pre-
FIGURE 16-9. Aneurysmal dilatation of the aorta and severe aortic insufficiency in a 31-year-old patient with giant cell arteri­tis. The frontal chest roentgenogram shows cardiomegaly with moderate left ventricular dilatation. The left heart border is elongated, and the cardiac apex projects below the left hemi­diaphragm. The ascending aorta and the aortic arch are mark­edly dilated. Mild pulmonary venous hypertension is indicated by equalization of the caliber of the upper and lower pulmonary vessels. Microscopic examination of surgical specimens of the aortic wall showed giant cell aortitis (same patient as in Fig. 16-10). (Courtesy of Spindola-Franco H, Fish BG, eds. Radiol­ogy of the heart: cardiac imaging in infants, children, and adults. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985:200.)
sent. The authors observed abnormal dilatation of the descending aorta. In addition, rib notching resulting from acquired coarctation has been observed in severe cases. Angiography, spiral CT, and MRI demonstrate characteristic findings such as stenosis of the aorta and its branches and poststenotic dilatation, saccular aneurysms, and even occlusions. The aorta may present the typical “rat-tail narrowing.” Echocardiography is helpful in as­sessing left ventricular function and in identifying the presence of thrombus in the left ventricle.
Treatment
Treatment is directed at control of the initial inflamma­tory process using steroids. Congestive heart failure and hypertension are treated with medical therapy. Surgical intervention occasionally is required in severe cases. En­darterectomy or bypass surgery is used for obstructive le­sions. Excision of aneur ysms, and rarely aortic valve re­placement, may be necessary. Balloon angioplasty has
Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta
https://t.me/med1917
173
been used in selected cases. Endovascular covered stents for treatment of aneurysms, or a combination of stenting and balloon dilatationfor selectedstenotic lesions, may be useful.
■ Giant Cell Arteritis
Giant cell arteritis, also known as temporal arteritis, is a granulomatous arteritis that involves medium-sized arter­ies in patients aged 50 years and older. The mean age of onset is 69 years, and 64% of cases occur in women. The aorta and its branches are involved in 15% of cases. The etiology is unknown, but it may be infectious or autoim­mune. The disease may manifest rapidly or it may have an insidious course. The triad of severe headache, malaise, and fever, along with aching and myalgias of the shoulder and pelvic girdle musculature, neck, and proximal ex­tremities, has been called polymyalgia rheumatica. The symptoms of claudication, headache, visual changes, and scalp tenderness are the result of arteritis. Claudication can occur in muscle groups in which the vascular supply is involved. Most commonly, muscles of mastication, de­glutition, and the extremities are involved. Visual symp­toms include diplopia, ptosis, and blindness, either par­tial or complete. Rarely, the aorta may be the first target,
mimicking Takayasu’s arteritis. Even more rarely, aortic aneurysms, aortic insufficiency, and aortic dissection may occur. Death can occur from heart failure, aortic rupture, or dissection. Laboratory findings, such as an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, are nonspecific, reflect­ing an inflammatory process. A definitive pathologic di­agnosis usually is established by examining multiple biop­sies of the temporal arteries.
28
Imaging modalities
In patients with aortic involvement, chest roentgenogra­phy shows a widened mediastinum (Fig. 16-9). The left ventricle may beenlarged if significant aortic insufficiency is present. MRI is the procedure of choice to assess the degree of aortic involvement and the presence of aortic insufficiency. TEE may help to distinguish giant cell arteri­ties from arteriosclerotic disease because irregularities of the wall and pedunculated plaques noted with arterioscle­rosis are not present in giant cell arteritis. CT is indicated when signs of dissection are evident, and immediate diag­nosis is necessary. Cardiac catheterization may be re­quired before surgery to assess the extent of aortic insuffi­ciency relative to the need for replacement of the aortic valve (Fig. 16-10).
FIGURE 16-10. Aortogram in a 31-year-old man with giant cell arteritis and aortic insufficiency. A:Anteroposterior view. B: Lateral view. The ascending and descending aorta are dilated. The arch is also dilated but to a lesser extent. The root of the aorta and the semilunar sinuses also are dilated. The left ventricle opacifies densely because of severe aortic insufficiency. The coronary arteries usually are dilated in patients with severe aortic insufficiency (same patient as in Fig. 16-9). (Courtesy of Spindola-Franco H, Fish BG, eds. Radiology of the heart: cardiac imaging in infants, children, and adults. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985:205.)
BA