Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5545_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1: Structure of Matter
- •2: Radioactive Decay
- •2.1 Spontaneous Fission
- •1.1.1 Radiation
- •1.2 The Atom
- •1.2.3 Nuclear Binding Energy
- •1.3 Nuclear Nomenclature
- •1.5 Questions
- •Suggested Readings
- •2.2 Isomeric Transition
- •2.2.1 Gamma (γ)-Ray Emission
- •2.2.2 Internal Conversion
- •2.2.2.1 Problem 2.1
- •2.2.2.2 Answer
- •2.3 Alpha (α)-Decay
- •2.4 Beta (β−)-Decay
- •2.5 Positron (β+)-Decay
- •2.6 Electron Capture
- •2.7 Questions
- •Suggested Readings
- •3.1 Radioactive Decay Equation
- •3.1.1 General Equation
- •3.1.2 Half-Life
- •3.1.3 Mean Life
- •3.1.4 Effective Half-Life
- •3.2 Units of Radioactivity
- •3.3 Specific Activity
- •3.4 Calculation
- •3.5 Successive Decay Equations
- •3.5.1 General Equation
- •3.5.2 Transient Equilibrium
- •3.5.3 Secular Equilibrium
- •3.6 Questions
- •Suggested Readings
- •4.5 Poisson Distribution
- •4.6 Gaussian Distribution
- •4.7 Chi-Square Test
- •4.8 Minimum Detectable Activity
- •4.10 Questions
- •Suggested Readings
- •5.1 Cyclotron-Produced Radionuclides
- •5.2 Reactor-Produced Radionuclides
- •5.2.1 Fission or (n, f) Reaction
- •5.2.2 Neutron Capture or (n, γ) Reaction
- •5.6 Radionuclide Generators
- •5.8 Questions
- •Suggested Readings
- •6.1.1 Specific Ionization
- •6.1.2 Linear Energy Transfer
- •6.1.3 Range
- •6.1.4 Bremsstrahlung
- •6.1.5 Positron Annihilation
- •6.2.1.1 Photoelectric Effect
- •6.2.1.2 Compton Scattering
- •6.2.1.3 Pair Production
- •6.2.1.4 Raleigh Scattering
- •6.2.1.5 Photodisintegration
- •6.3.2 Half-Value Layer
- •6.5 Questions
- •Suggested Readings
- •7: Gas-Filled Detector
- •7.1 Principles of Gas-Filled Detector
- •7.2 Ionization Chamber
- •7.2.1 Ion Chamber Survey Meter
- •7.2.2 Dose Calibrator
- •7.2.2.1 Constancy
- •7.2.2.2 Accuracy
- •7.2.2.3 Linearity
- •7.2.2.4 Geometry
- •7.2.3 Pocket Dosimeter
- •7.3 Proportional Counter
- •7.4 Geiger–Müller Counter
- •7.5 Questions
- •Suggested Readings
- •8.1 Scintillation Counter
- •8.4.3 Characteristic X-Ray Peak
- •8.4.4 Backscatter Peak
- •8.4.5 Iodine Escape Peak
- •8.2 Solid Scintillation Detector
- •8.2.1 NaI (Tl) Detector
- •8.2.2 Bismuth Germanate Detector
- •8.2.3 Barium Fluoride Detector
- •8.2.4 Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate Detector
- •8.2.5 Gadolinium Oxyorthosilicate Detector
- •8.2.6 Yttrium Oxyorthosilicate Detector
- •8.2.7 Yttrium Aluminum Perovskite Detector
- •8.2.8 Lutetium Yttrium Oxyorthosilicate Detector
- •8.2.9 Lanthanum Bromide Detector
- •8.3 Solid-State Detector
- •8.3.2 Cadmium–Zinc–Tellurium Detector
- •8.3.3 Cesium Iodide (CsI(Tl)) Detector
- •8.3.4 Solid Scintillation Counter
- •8.3.4.1 NaI(Tl) Detector
- •8.3.4.2 Photomultiplier Tube
- •8.3.4.3 Preamplifier
- •8.3.4.4 Linear Amplifier
- •8.3.4.5 Pulse-Height Analyzer
- •8.3.4.6 Display or Storage
- •8.4 Gamma-Ray Spectrometry
- •8.4.1 Photopeak
- •8.4.6 Positron Annihilation Peak
- •8.4.7 Coincidence Peak
- •8.5 Liquid Scintillation Counter
- •8.5.1 Quenching
- •8.6.1 Energy Resolution
- •8.6.2 Detection Efficiency
- •8.6.2.1 Intrinsic Efficiency
- •8.6.2.2 Photopeak Efficiency or Photofraction
- •8.6.2.3 Geometric Efficiency
- •8.6.3 Dead Time
- •8.7 Gamma Well Counter
- •8.8 Thyroid Probe
- •8.8.1 Thyroid Uptake Measurement
- •8.9 Questions
- •Suggested Readings
- •9: Gamma Camera
- •9.1 Gamma Camera
- •9.1.2 Detector
- •9.1.3 Collimator
- •9.1.4 Photomultiplier Tube
- •9.1.5 X-, Y-Positioning Circuit
- •9.1.6 Pulse-Height Analyzer
- •9.2 Digital Camera
- •9.2.1 Solid State Digital Camera
- •9.3 Questions
- •Suggested Readings
- •10.1.1 Spatial Resolution
- •10.1.1.1 Intrinsic Resolution
- •10.1.1.2 Collimator Resolution
- •10.1.1.3 Scatter Resolution
- •10.1.2.1 Bar Phantom
- •10.1.2.2 Line-Spread Function
- •10.1.2.3 Modulation Transfer Function
- •10.1.3 Sensitivity
- •10.1.3.1 Collimator Efficiency
- •10.1.4 Uniformity
- •10.1.5 Pulse-Height Variation
- •10.1.6 Nonlinearity
- •10.1.7 Edge Packing
- •10.2 Gamma Camera Tuning
- •10.4 Contrast
- •10.4.1 Count Density
- •10.4.2 Image Noise
- •10.4.4 High Count Rate
- •10.4.6 Patient Motion
- •10.5.1 Daily Checks
- •10.5.1.2 Uniformity
- •10.5.2 Weekly Checks
- •10.5.3 Monthly Checks
- •10.5.3.1 High-Count Uniformity Calibration
- •10.5.3.2 Collimator Integrity
- •10.5.4 Annual, Semiannual, or As-Needed Checks
- •10.6 Questions
- •References and Suggested Readings
- •11.1.1 Central Processing Unit
- •11.1.2 Computer Memory
- •11.1.3 External Storage Device
- •11.1.4 Input/Output Device
- •11.1.7 Digital-to-Analog Conversion
- •11.1.8 Digital Image
- •11.2.1 Digital Data Acquisition
- •11.2.2 Static Study
- •11.2.3 Dynamic Study
- •11.2.4 Gated Study
- •11.2.7 Display
- •11.3.1 PACS
- •11.4 Questions
- •Suggested Readings
- •12: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
- •12.1 Tomographic Imaging
- •12.2 Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
- •12.2.1 Data Acquisition
- •12.2.2 Image Reconstruction
- •12.2.2.1 Simple Backprojection
- •12.2.2.2 Filtered Backprojection
- •12.2.2.3 The Convolution Method
- •12.2.2.4 The Fourier Method
- •12.2.2.6 Iterative Reconstruction
- •12.3 SPECT/CT Scanner
- •12.4 Factors Affecting SPECT
- •12.4.1 Photon Attenuation
- •12.4.2 Attenuation Correction Methods
- •12.5 Partial-Volume Effect
- •12.5.2 Sampling
- •12.5.3 Scattering
- •12.6.1 Spatial Resolution
- •12.6.2 Sensitivity
- •12.6.3 Other Parameters
- •12.7.1 Daily Tests
- •12.7.2 Weekly Tests
- •12.7.2.1 Spatial Resolution
- •12.9 Questions
- •References and Suggested Readings
- •13: Positron Emission Tomography
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 PET Radiopharmaceuticals
- •13.3.2 Block Detector
- •13.5 Coincidence Timing Window
- •13.6 PET/CT Scanner
- •13.7 PET/MR Scanner
- •13.7.2 MR Scanner
- •13.7.3 Commercial PET/MR Scanner
- •13.8 Mobile PET or PET/CT Scanner
- •13.9 Micro-PET Scanner
- •13.11 Data Acquisition
- •13.12 Image Reconstruction
- •13.13 Factors Affecting PET
- •13.13.1 Normalization
- •13.13.2 Photon Attenuation Correction
- •13.13.4 Random Coincidences
- •13.13.5 Scatter Coincidences
- •13.13.6 Dead Time
- •13.13.7 Radial Elongation
- •13.14.1 Spatial Resolution
- •13.14.2 Sensitivity
- •13.14.2.1 Noise Equivalent Count Rate
- •13.15.1 Daily Tests
- •13.15.1.1 Sinogram Check
- •13.15.2 Weekly Tests
- •13.15.2.1 Normalization
- •13.18 Questions
- •References and Suggested Reading
- •14.1 Background
- •14.5 Artificial Neural Network
- •14.7 Machine Learning
- •14.7.1 Decision Tree
- •14.7.2 Random Forest
- •14.7.3 Support Vector Machine
- •14.7.4 Computer Vision
- •14.8 Deep Learning
- •14.8.1 Convolutional Network
- •14.8.2 Recurrent Neural Network
- •14.8.3 Generative Adversarial Network
- •14.8.4 Transfer Learning
- •14.9 Radiomics
- •14.10 Natural Language Processing
- •14.11 Large Language Model
- •14.12 Generative Artificial Intelligence
- •14.13.1 Prompt
- •14.13.2 Token
- •14.13.3 Hallucination
- •14.13.4 Deepfake
- •14.13.5 Overfitting
- •14.15 Chatbot
- •14.18 Legal Implication
- •14.20 Questions
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2.1 Scheduling
- •15.2.2 Image Acquisition
- •15.2.3 Image Processing
- •15.2.4 Interpretation
- •15.2.5 Reporting
- •15.3.1 Oncology
- •15.3.2 Cardiovascular Disease
- •15.3.3 Bone Scintigraphy
- •15.3.4 Thyroid Imaging
- •15.5 Drug Development
- •15.6 Questions
- •References and Suggested Reading
- •16: Internal Radiation Dosimetry
- •16.1 Radiation Unit
- •16.1.1 Roentgen
- •16.1.2 Rad
- •16.1.3 Gray
- •16.1.4 Rem
- •16.1.5 Radiation Weighting Factor
- •16.1.6 Quality Factor
- •16.1.7 Sievert
- •16.2 Dose Calculation
- •16.2.1 Radiation Dose Rate
- •16.2.2 Cumulative Radiation Dose
- •16.2.3 Factors Affecting Ã
- •16.2.4 The S Values
- •16.4 Pediatric Dosage
- •16.5 Questions
- •References and Suggested Readings
- •17: Radiation Biology
- •17.1 The Cell
- •17.2.1 DNA Molecule
- •17.2.2 Chromosome
- •17.5 Cell Survival Curves
- •17.6 Factors Affecting Radiosensitivity
- •17.6.1 Dose Rate
- •17.6.2 Linear Energy Transfer
- •17.6.4 Chemicals
- •17.7 Radiosensitizer
- •17.7.1 Oxygen
- •17.7.2 Pyrimidine
- •17.7.3 Others
- •17.8 Radioprotector
- •17.9 Apoptosis
- •17.13.1 Hematopoietic Syndrome
- •17.13.2 Gastrointestinal Syndrome
- •17.13.3 Cerebrovascular Syndrome
- •17.14.1 Somatic Effects
- •17.14.1.1 Carcinogenesis
- •17.14.1.3 Dose–Response Relationship
- •17.14.1.5 Leukemia
- •17.14.1.6 Breast Cancer
- •17.14.1.7 Other Cancers
- •17.14.1.10 Nonspecific Life-Shortening
- •17.14.1.11 Cataractogenesis
- •17.14.2 Genetic Effects
- •17.14.2.1 Spontaneous Mutation
- •17.14.2.2 Doubling Dose
- •17.14.2.3 Genetically Significant Dose
- •17.17 Questions
- •References and Suggested Readings
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Radiation Protection
- •18.2.3 Occupational Dose Limits
- •18.2.4 ALARA Program
- •18.2.5.1 Time
- •18.2.5.2 Distance
- •18.2.5.3 Shielding
- •18.2.5.4 Activity
- •18.2.6 Personnel Monitoring
- •18.2.6.1 Film Badge
- •18.2.6.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimeter
- •18.2.6.3 Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter
- •18.3 Radiation Regulations
- •18.3.1 License
- •18.3.1.1 General License
- •18.3.1.2 Specific License of Limited Scope
- •18.3.1.3 Specific Licenses of Broad Scope
- •18.3.2 Radiation Safety Committee
- •18.3.3 Radiation Safety Officer
- •18.3.4.3 Supervision
- •18.3.4.4 Mobile Nuclear Medicine Service
- •18.3.4.5 Written Directives
- •18.4 Bioassay
- •18.6 Radioactive Waste Disposal
- •18.6.2 Release into Sewerage Systems
- •18.6.4 Other Disposal Methods
- •18.7 Radioactive Spill
- •18.8 Recordkeeping
- •18.10 Dirty Bombs
- •18.11 Types of Accidental Radiation Exposure
- •18.12 Protective Measures in Case of Explosion of a Dirty Bomb
- •18.13 Verification Card for Radioactive Patients
- •18.14 Radiation Phobia
- •18.15 European Regulations Governing Radiation
- •18.16 Questions
- •References and Suggested Readings
- •Index

13.6 PET/CT Scanner
217
standard of practice. The sale of PET/CT units worldwide has outpaced that of PET
scanners, with the sale of the latter dwindling.
Three manufacturers dominate the PET/CT markets: Siemens Healthineers, GE
Healthcare, and Philips Healthcare. Each company has introduced several models in
the market, making many technical improvements over the years. Currently available PET/CT cameras have highly sophisticated features affording good quality
images. The physical features of three PET/CT scanners from three manufacturers
are listed in Table13.2, and a commercial PET/CT scanner is shown in Fig.13.6.
Table 13.2 Some features of commercial PET/CT scanners
GE Healthcare Philips Healthcare Siemens Healthineer
Model/product name Omni Legend 32 Vereos Biograph Vision 450
PET Scanner
Gantry dimensions,
H x W x D, cm
Weight, kg 3208 4195 3731
Patient port (cm) 70 70 78
Transmission source CT correction
Vertical travel 6–205mm below
Acquisition modes 3-D (fully) 3-D (fully) Static, multi-bed, list
Horizontal speed 100mm/s 185mm/s 0–200mm/s
Number of detectors 72 23,040 DPC detectors 228
Number of image
planes
Number of crystals 38,016 23,040 45,600
Number of PMTs N/A digital N/A N/A—29, 184 SiPMs
Physical axial FOV, cm32 16.4 20
196×234×170 206.5×220.5×484.9 204×234×136
CT CT
attenuation
47 NS
isocenter
153 164, 82, 41 119
Detector material Digital BGO w/SiPM LYSO LSO
Crystal size, mm 4.1×4.1×30 4×4×19 4×4×20
System sensitivity—
3-D, kcps/uCi/cc //
LLD (NEMA 2001)
Transverse resolution
@ 1cm, mm (NEMA
2001)
Axial resolution @
1cm, mm (NEMA
2001)
Peak noise equivalent
count rate, kcps
(NEMA 2001) 3D
46 cps / kBq 22.0 with digital TOF 8.9 cps/kBq (55 cps/
kBq effective)
1.4 4.1 FWHM 3.2 (OSEM); 3.5
(FBP)
2.5 4.1 FWHM 3.4 (OSEM); 3.7
(FBP)
125 @ 15.8 KBq/ml NS Yes
(continued)

218
13 Positron Emission Tomography
Table 13.2
Model/product name Omni Legend 32 Vereos Biograph Vision 450
Scatter fraction—3-D
(NEMA 2001)
CT parameters
Type of CT detector Clarity detector Solid State—GOS UltraFast Ceramic
kV-range/mA-range 80 kv-140 KV at
CTDI (dose/100 mAs)
B/16cm phant
Standard HC
resolution (2% MTF)
Number of slices 64 or 128 64 or 128 64, 128 (acquired
Slice thickness (mm) 0.625 0.5–12.5 0.4–10
Reconstruction time
std. / high res / topo
Adapted from ‘PET/CT Systems Comparison Chart’, January 16, 2024, Imaging Technology
News (ITN),
Reprinted with permission
(continued)
GE Healthcare Philips Healthcare Siemens Healthineer
0.35 0.32 0.39 @ peak
80–140 kVp/20–665
120kV: 10 to 600mA,
5mA increment
Axial head: 16.7mGy
Axial body: 8.7mGy
7.5 13.0 lp/cm (at cutoff) 16.4 lp/cm
2s/max 55 fps Up to 25 images/s Up to 80 images/s
https://www.itnonline.com/chart/petct- systems. Copyright 2024 by Wainscot Media.
(1mA steps)
6mGy/100 mAs) 64 slice: 9.3 @
70–140 kVP
20–800mA
100kV 128 slice: 8.5
@ 100kV
slices)
Fig. 13.6 Siemens
Biograph Vision PET/
CT. (Courtesy of Siemens
Medical Solutions USA,
Inc.)

13.7 PET/MR Scanner
219
13.7 PET/MR Scanner
On the heels of success with PET/CT in clinical imaging, interest has grown considerably for the similar application of PET/MR as a clinical diagnostic modality. MR
provides anatomic and structural images with submillimeter spatial resolution,
offering a better soft-tissue contrast than CT.MR also has the great advantage of
using magnetic radiofrequency, thus eliminating the radiation dose to the patient.
The following is a brief description of currently available PET/MR scanners.
13.7.1 Principles ofMR Imaging
It is beyond the scope of this book to describe in detail the principles of magnetic
resonance (MR) imaging and the readers are referred to specic textbooks on MR
imaging. The following is a brief summary of the subject.
MRI is based on the magnetic property of atomic nuclei. Protons and neutrons
have magnetic moments due to inherent angular momentum and spin haphazardly
(Fig.13.7a). Nuclei containing even numbers of protons and neutrons possess no
net magnetic moment, because of the cancellation of the individual magnetic
moments by the even number of nucleons. Nuclei containing odd number of protons
or neutrons, however, possess a net magnetic moment that has both a magnitude and
a direction and behave like magnets. When these nuclei (or spins, as they are commonly called) are placed in a large external magnetic eld (B0), they align themselves (at a slight angle) in either parallel or antiparallel direction to the magnetic
eld and also precess (rotate) at a frequency proportional to the strength of the eld
(Fig.13.7b). The parallel spins remain in the lower energy state and the antiparallel
ones in the high energy state, the energy difference being ΔE. Normally, a slightly
greater number of spins exist in the parallel direction and they increase with the
increase in magnetic eld strength. These excess spins result in a net magnetization
) with a measurable magnetic moment parallel to the eld of B0 and they are said
(M
z
to be at equilibrium in the Z direction. If a radiofrequency pulse (RF), which is an
oscillating electromagnetic eld normally termed B1, is applied perpendicular to B0
at the precessional (resonant) frequency of the nuclei, the latter absorb energy from
the RF eld and make a transition to the high energy state. As a result, the longitudinal magnetization (Mz) ips towards the transverse plane (X–Y plane) at different
angles depending on the strength of the RF pulse, thus causing transverse magnetization (Mxy). RF pulses that cause 90° ipping are called 90° pulses and produce
maximum possible transverse magnetization (Fig.13.8) and are commonly used in
MR imaging. If a 180° pulse is applied, it will invert Mz to −Mz i.e., the longitudinal
magnetization will be inverted in the opposite direction (Fig.13.8).
Hydrogen atoms have one proton in the nucleus and are abundant in the living
body mostly in the form of water (70%), with the remainder in tissues and fat. When
a patient is placed in a magnetic eld (B0) as in a MR machine, the tissues become
magnetized due to excess parallel protons or spins that align with B0 and remain at
equilibrium. When an RF pulse (commonly 90° pulse) is applied perpendicular to

220
M
z
ab
z
y
13 Positron Emission Tomography
Anti-parallel
∆
Net
magnetic
B
0
Parallel
Fig. 13.7 (a) Free protons spin randomly and their magnetic moments cancel each other, with a
residual momentum due to an unpaired proton, if any. (b) When an external magnetic eld, B
applied, the protons orient themselves in either parallel or antiparallel direction to the eld B
number of parallel protons is slightly larger than the antiparallel ones, thus creating a net magnetic
moment in the direction of B
The energy difference between the two groups is ΔE
0.
moment
0
. The
0
, is
M+
Increasing B1
M
z
B
0
x
z
y
x
Fig. 13.8 When a radiofrequency pulse (RF), B1, is applied to the MZ (longitudinal magnetiza-
tion) in the presence of B
ing on the strength of B
magnetization M
xy
, MZ ips towards the transverse (X–Y) plane at different angles depend-
0
. RF pulse that causes 90° ipping produces maximum transverse
1
. If a 180° pulse is used, +MZ becomes −M
B0, the equilibrium of longitudinal magnetization is perturbed as a result of energy
absorption from the RF eld by the excess parallel spins of the nuclei, and the magnetization vector orients to the transverse or X–Y plane (at 90° for the 90° pulse). All
nuclei remain in phase coherence, meaning magnetization vectors of all neighboring nuclei point in the same direction with maximum magnetization. If a receiver
coil is placed perpendicular to the external eld B0, the transverse magnetization
(maximum Mxy) induces a current or a sinusoidal MR signal in the receiver coil
according to Faraday’s law of induction. This signal is called free induction decay
(FID) signal and its size increases with the strength of the magnetic eld B0 and the
magnitude of the RF pulse (B1). As the RF eld is switched off, the FID signal
decays resulting in the return of all nuclei to the original state they had before. This
z
Mz=0
M
xy
x
Z
z
y
M
z

13.7 PET/MR Scanner
Fig. 13.9 Following a 90°
RF pulse, longitudinal
magnetization M
converted to zero at X–Y
plane, but returns to
equilibrium exponentially.
It occurs through
spin-lattice interaction with
a relaxation constant T1,
which is the time when
63% of M
is
Z
is recovered
Z
221
return is called relaxation of the nuclei. Two types of basic relaxation occur in tissues simultaneously, T1 and T2, and both contribute to the decay of the MR signal.
In T1 relaxation, nuclei give off their excess energy by spin-lattice interaction to
the surrounding molecular structures (lattice) and start to regrow magnetization
along B0, nally reaching the original value of maximum longitudinal magnetization
at equilibrium. The rate of this regrowth is characterized by a tissue relaxation
parameter called T1, which is dened by the time to recover 63% of the maximum
longitudinal magnetization following a 90° pulse (Fig.13.9). T1 values depend on
the vibrational frequencies and hence the physical characteristics of the molecules,
such as solid or liquid states, or stationary or moving structures.
In T2 relaxation following the shut-off of the RF pulse, all nuclei lose their phase
coherence over time due to the random collision among neighboring nuclei (spinspin interaction), thus losing energy to return to the original state of random phase.
Random collision is caused by varying precessions of the nuclei at different velocities because of the small inhomogeneities of the magnetic eld intrinsic to the structure of the tissues, and also of the external eld B0. The dephasing results in a fast
exponential decay of the MR signal characterized by the time T2, which is given by
the time interval between the peak transverse signal and 37% of the peak (1/e)
(Fig.13.10).
T1 values increase with higher magnetic eld and are normally much longer than
T2 values for most tissues. Both T1 and T2 values depend on the composition of
tissues. For example, fat has a short T1 and uid (cerebrospinal uid, cyst, etc.) has
longer T1, so fat is seen as bright, whereas uid appears as dark. Other tissues fall
within the range between the two. On the other hand, mobile molecules such as
blood exhibit a long T2, whereas nonmoving structures like bone have a short T2.

222
Fig. 13.10 Following a
90° RF pulse, MZ ips to
X–Y plane (M
loses phase coherence due
to spin-spin interaction in
tissues and inhomogeneity
of the external eld. The
FID signal decays
exponentially with a time
constant T2, during which
the signal decays to 37%
), which
xy
13 Positron Emission Tomography
MR signals depend on proton density, T1, and T2 relaxation time constants of
different tissues in the body. One can obtain sufcient contrast between tissues by
manipulating the timing, order, polarity, and repetition frequency of RF pulses and
B0. Tailoring of these parameters is alluded to as pulse sequence, the application of
which depends on the type of tissue being imaged. Three major types of pulse
sequences are spin echo (SE), inversion recovery (IR) and gradient recalled echo
(GRE), the details of which are available in standard physics books. In spin echo
pulse sequence, a 90° pulse is applied to cause transverse magnetization in tissues,
followed by a 180° pulse to reverse it to the longitudinal magnetization. When all
spins are rephased, an RF “echo” (a measureable MR signal) is produced and the
time between the 90° pulse and the peak of the echo is called the time of echo (TE).
The time between two successive 90° pulses is called the repetition time (TR). A
spin-echo sequence of a short TR (e.g., 250–1000 ms) and a short TE (less than 25
ms) highlights the T1 difference in tissues and is called T1-weighting, whereas a
combination of a long TR (2500–6500 ms) and a long TE (more than 75 ms) emphasizes T2 differences in tissues and hence the T2-weighting. In an IR pulse sequence,
an 180° pulse is applied causing net longitudinal magnetization along the −Z direction that moves towards equilibrium along the +Z direction due to spin-lattice interaction. But a 90° pulse is applied before reaching equilibrium whereby the
longitudinal magnetization ips to the X–Y plane ultimately producing a FID signal.
This technique is used to generate contrast between tissues with very different T1
values by adjusting the inversion recovery time (the time between the inversion
180° pulse and the 90° pulse). In GRE pulse sequence, small angle RF pulses (typically 20–60°) are applied in rapid succession to tissues. The technique is useful in

13.7 PET/MR Scanner
223
eliminating the artifacts arising from respiratory motion by having a breath-hold
acquisition. A given pulse sequence is chosen on the basis of tissue characteristics
dened by the T1 and T2 relaxation times and proton density.
Paramagnetic contrast agents, commonly gadolinium chelates such as Gd-DTPA,
when injected intravenously, accumulate in extra vascular space over time and
shorten both T1 and T2 values. But at a commonly used concentration of these contrast agents, better contrast is obtained in T1- weighted images.
13.7.2 MR Scanner
An MR scanner is made up of coils of special metal alloys shaped in a cylindrical
bore and cooled by liquid helium. Electric current is applied through the coils,
which induces a constant magnetic eld along the bore of the magnet. The magnets
used in most clinical machines are superconducting magnets. In open MR systems
commonly used for claustrophobic patients, two disc-shaped magnets are positioned with a gap in between to accommodate patients. An RF coil is used to perturb
the magnetization of the atomic nuclei. The same coil or separate coils are used to
receive the echo signals from the tissue. Integrated in machines are a patient table,
magnetic shielding, various monitoring equipment, and, of course, a dedicated computer. Currently, the maximum available eld strength of the clinical MR machines
is 7.0 T, whereas it is limited to 1.2 T in open MR systems. However, MR machines
with 10 T and 11 T are now being explored for clinical research.
13.7.3 Commercial PET/MR Scanner
Integration of PET with MR into a single unit faces several hurdles, which have
been overcome over the years to some degree. First, the commonly used photomultiplier tubes are sensitive to the radiofrequency of the magnetic eld causing artifacts in PET images, now they are replaced by magnetic eld-insensitive avalanche
photodiodes. Next, compact PET detectors must be designed and shielded to be
incorporated into the MR unit so that radiofrequency does not interfere with the
PET data processing. Unlike PET/CT where simultaneous PET and CT data acquisitions are not feasible because of the crossover of pulses, an integrated PET/MR
offers an advantage of simultaneous data acquisition since the radiofrequency pulse
and the radiation pulse do not interfere with each other, thus reducing the time of
scanning. Since, unlike CT imaging, there is no x-ray attenuation in MR imaging
for attenuation correction in PET, a new way of attenuation correction need to be
devised. Also in the absence of radiation from MR unit, PET/MR offers a low radiation dose to the patient.

224
13 Positron Emission Tomography
GE Healthcare, Siemens Healthineer, and Philips Healthcare have each developed PET/MR scanners of their own based on different designs but using the same
basic principle. The GE scanner basically consists of two separate systems—PET/
CT and MR, and the patient is scanned on each unit separately following transportation from one modality to the other. The two images are fused by algorithm, but the
technique suffers from inadequate accuracy in alignment due to possible variation
in patient position in two modalities. Furthermore, because of the CT unit, the radiation burden on the patient is relatively higher with the GE scanner.
Philips Healthcare has introduced Ingenuity TF PET/MRI scanner, in which TF
PET and 3-T MR units are positioned at a distance of 2.5m at opposite ends. A
oor-based bed is incorporated between the two scanners that can be turned around
180° to position the patient in either scanner. The patient is scanned sequentially in
both scanners, and two images are fused more accurately because of the proper
alignment of the scanners with the scanning bed.
In Siemens’s whole-body Biograph mMR scanner, PET and MR units are completely integrated such that data acquisition in both scanners is accomplished
simultaneously. The PET detectors are made of avalanche LSO photodiodes that
are ingeniously imbedded into the 3-T MR coils. The block detectors contain a
cooling feature for optimal PET performance, and also a special shielding is incorporated in the system to eliminate radiofrequency interference with the PET data
acquisition and processing. Furthermore, low attenuation material has been
employed in what is called total imaging matrix (TIM) coils and the table in the MR
system to minimize the attenuation of PET signals. Simultaneous data acquisition
matching in time and position provides the most accurate fusion of images and
reduces the time of scanning signicantly. Siemens biograph mMR is shown in
Fig.13.11. Physical and technical parameters of Philips Healthcare’s Ingenuity TF
PET/MRI and Siemen’s Biograph mMR are given in Table 13.3. MR, PET and
fused PET/MR images of a section of of the whole body of a patient is shown in
Fig.13.12.
Fig. 13.11 Siemens
Biograph mMR scanner.
(Courtesy of Siemens
Medical Solutions USA,
Inc.)

13.7 PET/MR Scanner
225
Table 13.3
Manufacturer Philips Healthcare Siemens Healthineer
Product model Ingenuity TF PET/MR Biograph mMR PET/MR
MRI imaging simultaneous or
separate scans
Is PET imaging time-of-ight Time of ight Conventional
Scanner characteristics
PET/MRI system 3-D time-of-ight
Inner bore dimensions, cm PET: 70, MR: 60 60(D) x 199(L)
Weight, kg (lb) 7646 9000
Patient handling
Patient scan range, cm 190 199
Maximum patient weight, kg (lb) 200 with horizontal
Table width (moving portion), cm53 54
Table vertical travel (min.
height–scan.height), cm
Software processing
Acquisition modes (2-D, 3-D) PET: 3-D; MR: 2-D/3-D T: 3-D; MR: 2-D/3-D,
Simultaneous acquisition/
processing?
Automated standard uptake value
(SUV) creation?
PET assembly
Type of detectors Pixelar with continuous
Number of crystals 28,336 28,672
Number of photo sensors 28 pixelar modulars 4032 APDs
Detector crystal material LYSO LSO
Crystal size, mm 4×4×22 4×4×20
Ring diameter, cm 90 65.6
Number of PMTs 420 N/A
Physical axial FOV, cm 18 26
System sensitivity—3-D, kcps/
uCi/cc // LLD (NEMA 2001)
Transverse resolution @ 1cm,
mm (NEMA 2001)
Transverse resolution @ 10cm,
mm (NEMA 2001)
Some specications of PET/MR scanner from two manufacturers
Fully integrated
sequential
PET/3.0T multi-transit
MR
motion
66, 94 40
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
light guide
13.2cps/kBq 13.2cps/kBq
4.9mm 4.4
5.5mm 5.2
Fully integrated sequential
Magnetic shielding, solid-state
APD PET compatible MR coils
200(400)
spectroscopy
Solid-state APDs
(continued)

226
13 Positron Emission Tomography
Table 13.3
Manufacturer Philips Healthcare Siemens Healthineer
Axial resolution @ 1cm, mm
(NEMA 2001)
Axial resolution @ 10cm, mm
(NEMA 2001)
Scatter fraction—3-D (NEMA
2001)
Time of Flight—timing
resolution
Field strength, T 3 3
Simultaneous scan and
reconstruction
RF system
Channels (minimum maximum
conguration)
Imaging features
Non-contrast angiography Ye s Yes
Spectroscopy Yes Yes
Motion compensating radial
techniques
Brain volume imaging Ye s Ye s
Number of RF channels 32 32
Adapted from “PET/MR Systems Comparison Chart,” August 11, 2023, Imaging Technology News
(ITN),
Reprinted with permission
(continued)
4.9mm 4.5
5.5mm 6.7
30% 42%
535ps N/A
Yes Yes
32 standard 18, 32
Yes Yes
https://www.itnonline.com/chart/petmr- systems. Copyright 2023 by Wainscot Media.
Fig. 13.12 Whole body
MR, PET and fused PET/
MR images of a patient.
(Supplied by Annemarie
Grammens, Siemens
Healthereen)
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
