Добавил:
ivanov666
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Стилистика английского языка. English Stylistics. Учебное пособие
.pdf
61
Chapter 1. The Style of Official Documents
I feel I should now like to extend my experience and better
circumstances, and I am certain that I should give complete satisfaction
if you should see your way to engage me.
Yours truly,
(Miss) mu r i e l Br e n t
March 30
Mr. T.V. Bell
de A r Si r ,
I have now taken up your references, and, as they are quite satisfactory,
I shall be glad if you will start work here, as arranged, on Monday next at
9.30. Please ask for Mr. Mortimer, who will be expecting you.
As agreed at our interview, your salary will be £_ __ a year, and the
hours of work from 9.30 to 5.30, with a fortnight’s holiday each year. The
engagement may be terminated by a month’s notice on either side.
Yours faithfully,
For H. mo r g A n & Co., lt d .,
S.S. Jo n e S .
Manager
248 lo n g lA k e ,
le W i S H A m ,
S.E.13.
April 28
de A r mr S . ____ _,
As I have now the offer of a good post in Dorchester, I shall be very
much obliged if you will give me a reference for the four years spent in
your service, so that I can forward it to my new employer. Will you please
speak both as to my character and work? I think my work always gave
you satisfaction, so I hope you will say all you can in my favour, as I am
very eager to get this post.
Yours faithfully,
JA n e o’Co n n o r
th
th

62
Part II. FUNCTIONAL STYLISTICS
Assignment 4. Study the list of terms and abbreviations from an extract
of the sample order below. Read the sample military order. Point out its
peculiarities at lexical and syntactical levels.
classification – гриф секретности
OPORD = operations order – боевой приказ; pl – директивы
и распоряжения
situation – обстановка
intelligence – разведка
сorps – корпус
Inf Div = Infantry Division – пехотная дивизия
Armd Cav = armored cavalry – разведывательный (бронекавалерий-
ский)
Bde = brigade – бригада
execution – задача по частям и подразделениям
Opn Overlay = operation overlay – схема-приказ (на кальке)
mission – задача дивизии
reinf = reinforce – усиливать
arty – артиллерия
SOI = signal operation instruction – инструкция по использованию
средств связи
div res = division reserve – дивизионный резерв
Plat = platoon – взвод
CA = Civil Affairs (Administration) – администрация (управление)
по гражданским делам; гражданская администрация
Co atatch = company + atatch – присоединить роту
16.00.01: 16 – число, 00 – часы, 01 – минуты
X river – безымянная река
ORDER FOR DEFENCE INFANTRY DIVISION
(Classification)
Copy No 2
20th Inf Div
KIA (4413), LADIA
152000 May 19__ _
GV 37

63
Chapter 1. The Style of Official Documents
OPORD 13
Reference: Map, LADIA, R-10-5. 1:250,000, NAKI
1. SITUATION
a. Enemy forces. Annex A, Intelligence.
b. Friendly forces.
1) 1st Corps defends line inclusive KUDDA (5263) – SYMA
(4821) – DEPAL (4984).
2) Corps covering force composed of 101st Armd Cav in position
along line NORA (6769) – OBOR (6319) – GOZA (6484).
st
3) 601
Arty reinf 20th Div Arty.
c. Attachments and detachments. 525th MI DET and 2d Plat, 5416 CA
Co atch effective 16.00.01.
2. MISSION
Div defends X River between inclusive SYMA (3907) and TOROS
(5106).
3. EXECUTION
a. Conception of operation. Forward elements will occupy positions
which permit a strong defense of the river initially but will withdraw to
prepared positions on dominating terrain if forced to do so by major
enemy crossings. Annex B, Opn Overlay.
Div res will contain and reduce enemy penetrations. Approximately
half the available nuclear weapons will be reserved for use against
penetrations. Priority of arty fires and air support to 1st Bde initially, to
res upon commitment.
(Classification)
SELF-STUDY: TEXTS / EXTRACTS FOR STYLISTIC ANALYSIS
Assignment 5. Prepare in writing complex stylistic analysis of some of
the texts given under assignments 1–4. Make your own choice. See the plan
for analysis in Appendix 1.
REFERENCES
Арнольд, И.В. Стилистика. Современный английский язык: учеб. /
И.В. Арнольд. 4-е изд., испр. и доп. М. : Флинта ; Наука, 2002. – 283 c.

64
Part II. FUNCTIONAL STYLISTICS
Борисенко, И.И. Английский язык в международных документах (право,
торговля, дипломатия) : учеб. пособие / И.И. Борисенко, Л.И. Евтушенко.
Киев : Логос, 2001. – 480 с.
Бурлак, Т.Ф. Специфика делового текста / Т.Ф. Бурлак // Материалы ежегод. научн.-практ. конф. преподавателей и аспирантов МГЛУ, 16–17 апр.
2002 г. – 2003. – Ч. 3. – С. 12–14.
Гальперин, И.Р. Стилистика английского языка = English Stylistics /
И.Р. Галь перин. 5-е изд. М. : Книжный дом «Либроком», 2013. – 336 с.
Знаменская, Т.А. Стилистика английского языка. Основы курса : учеб.
пособие / Т.А. Знаменская. 3-е изд., испр. М. : Едиториал УРСС, 2005. –
208 с.
Калюжная, В.В. Стиль англоязычных документов международных организаций / В.В. Калюжная. Киев : Навукова Думка, 1982. – 113 с.
Нелюбин, Л.Л. Перевод боевых документов армии США / Л.Л. Нелюбин. М. : Воениздат МО СССР, 1971. – 332 с.
Сакун, О.Ф. Дипломатическое ремесло / О.Ф. Сакун. М. : Междунар.
отношения, 2008. – 440 с.
Скребнев, Ю.М. Основы стилистики английского языка : учеб. /
Ю.М. Скребнев. 2-е изд., испр. М. : Астрель ; АСТ, 2003. – 223 с.
Crystal, D. Investigating English Style / Davy Crystal. L., 1973. – 264 p.
Mouratoc, E.N. Diplomatic Documents and Diplomatic Corres pondence in
English / E.N. Mouratoc. – M.: ACT, 2001.
The Complete Guide to Letter Writing. L.&N.Y. : Frederick Warne & Co.
Ltd., 1965. – 320 p.

65
Chapter 1. The Style of Official Documents
CHAPTER 2. THE SCIENTIfIC PRoSE STYLE
THEORY
The scientific prose style has three main subdivisions / substyles: the
and
.
In real communication the style under consideration is presented by a
variety of text types known as genres, such as: articles, monographs,
research and critical papers, text-books, lectures, theses, dissertations,
scientific essays, reviews, research projects, theoretical overviews, RTD
(Research and Technology Development) results presentations, etc.
Regardless of the type of academic writing and the scientific discipline
(be it physics or history, biology or linguistics) all the texts functioning in
the sphere of professional communication have a c o m m o n a i m : t o
w o r k a n d g r o u n d t h e or e t i c al k n o w l e dg e ab o u t o b j e c t i v e
r e a l i t y. This know ledge is presented in a precise, logical and
unambiguous way with the help of the relevant lexical, grammatical and
compositional means.
Thus, the most notable feature of scientific vocabulary is the abundant
use of terms, which contribute to the exactness and clarity of scholarly
writing. Every scientific discipline has developed a specific set of terms
and clichés adapted to its nature: astronomy – galaxyquasar; physics –
collider nucleus; chemistry – carbondioxide oxygen; linguistics –
modalityoxymoron.
Alongside pure scientific terms scholars use the so-called general
scientific vocabulary: definition, experiment, observation, postulate,
ascribe, predetermine, etc.
Words like these impart intellectual information irrespective of its
kind – strictly scientific, pertaining to exact or natural sciences or dealing
with humanities. The basic stock of scientific vocabulary are words which
belong to the core of the language and they are used in their primary
logical meaning.
Ideally, scholarly writing is unemotional but in popular scientific texts
(scientific essays, articles carried by newspapers and magazines) and some

66
Part II. FUNCTIONAL STYLISTICS
genres (critical papers, reviews, academic lectures) we can come across
emotionally coloured words (perfectly structured, thorough investigation,
excellent technique, etc.) and even lexical stylistic devices – metaphors,
similes, though in most cases not original, dead. These means help scholars
express their subjective attitude towards new ideas, theories and facts.
Another distinguishing feature of scientific style that ensures its
impersonal objective character is the use:
of passive constructions (•• In this chapter some ideas will be presented
and commented upon);
impersonal sentences (•• One can’t but agree with the statement);
active forms with the so-called plural of modesty •• We and its variants
(To this research we will refer later. Our aim is to illustrate certain
aspects of the phenomenon).
A logical and coherent character of scientific texts reveals itself in such
syntactical peculiarities as the preferential use of complex and compound
sentences, extensive use of participial, gerundial and infinitive constructions,
developed and varied system of connectives (and that, if, as, in so far as...,
both … and, whether… or, not merely … but also).
Logical coherence and objectivity of scholarly writing is also sustained
by the frequent use of quotations, references and footnotes which actuate
a kind of an implicit dialogue going on between the author of the text and
other scholars.
Besides the uniform features in lexis and grammar mentioned above,
each type of scientific text may have some specific elements depending
on a particular sphere of investigation. Thus texts on exact and natural
sciences are likely to include all kinds of diagrams, tables, schemes and
formulae, while humanitarian texts are notable for a wider use of active
constructions, elements of emotional vocabulary and expressive syntax:
inversion, rhetorical questions, parallel constructions.
The language peculiarities of each scientific text also tend to reflect
the type of the potential reader. The author addresses their colleagues (in
a monograph, a thesis), students (in a lecture, a text-book), the general
reading public (in a popular scientific article) in a different way.
The compositional design of a scientific text largely depends on its
genre. Thus the structural arrangement of a text-book (introduction,

67
Chapter 2. The scientific prose style
chapters, paragraph division, conclusion) differs from those of an article
or a thesis. The peculiar compositional pattern is the primary factor we
rely on in identifying the type of scientific writing.
Self-control questions
What is the aim of the scientific style?1.
What are the basic types of scientific texts?2.
What are the functions of special terminology and general 3.
scientific vocabulary?
What is the role of passive constructions and the plural of modesty 4.
we in scientific writing?
Why do scientists frequently use quotations, references and 5.
footnotes?
In what way do academic texts (monographs, dissertations) differ 6.
from popular scientific articles?
How are the peculiarities of a particular genre reflected in 7.
a scientific text?
PRACTICE
ASSIGNMENTS FOR CLASS WORK
Assignment 1. Read the following articles on astronomy, biology and
linguistics. Point out the linguistic peculiarities (lexical, morphological,
syntactical) that unite the samples of exact, natural and humanitarian sciences
into a single genre of the scientific article.
from “Contemporary Physics”, April 1999
In the mid 1990s an Anglo-American team of astronomers made
a major breakthrough in work on the formation of galaxies, with their
discovery of embryo galaxies, irregular masses of hot plasma in which
young stars were forming. They were first detected by Britain’s William
Herschel telescope, which identified candidate protogalaxies by the blue
colour of very young stars, together with bands of wavelengths which
were predictably completely absent because they had been absorbed by
clouds of gas during the long journey of radiation from the early universe,
less than one billion years old, to today’s telescopes.

68
Part II. FUNCTIONAL STYLISTICS
Many more primeval galaxies were found in subsequent observations
made by the United States Hubble space telescope. The data from the
Hubble observations was first analysed by astronomers at the British
universities of Cambridge and Durham who had developed a computer
model of galaxy formation, based on the theory that the universe also
contains exotic and as yet undiscovered particles of cold dark matter.
A coherent picture of the formation and evolution of the galaxies is now
in place.
The Search for Dark Matter
Many astrophysicists now believe that up to 99% of the mass of the
Universe is composed of dark matter, whose presence is revealed only by
the gravitational forces it exerts on familiar, luminous matter. Theory
predicts that much of this matter may consist of novel, weakly interacting,
heavy particles of neutral charge, christened neutralinos, with a mass of
between ten and one thousand proton masses. Neutralinos have also been
nicknamed WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles).
Calculations suggest that while most WIMPs would pass through the
Earth without interacting, a few would collide with atomic nuclei causing
the nuclei to recoil. These rare and low-energy events could be detected
by conventional detectors which produce small bursts of light or electric
charge when a collision took place.
from “Biological Sciences”, March 2011
British scientists led the world in the application to mammals of the
technique known as cloning, which is used to produce identical genetic
copies of any individual by transferring a nucleus from one of that
individual’s body cells into a fertilised egg cell in place of that cell’s own
nucleus, and replacing the egg cell in the womb of the animals it came
from, to be born normally. In February 1997 this technique was used for
the first time to create a cloned sheep named “Dolly” from an adult,
differentiated cell.
There are several medically as well as agriculturally important uses
for cloning. The technique makes it possible to build up large numbers of
identical animals carrying valuable genes more rapidly than by other
means. Dolly was cloned at the Roslin Institute near Edinburgh, in

69
Chapter 2. The scientific prose style
collaboration with PPL Therapeutics. They plan to use cloning techniques
to build up herds of farm animals, cows or sheep, with added human
genes which are designed to cause the animals to produce therapeutic
human proteins into their milk. Blood clotting Factor 9 for the treatment
of haemophilia, and antirypsin for the treatment of emphysema are among
the proteins being experimentally produced this way.
While only those who are opposed to any use of animals in research
are likely to object to the above, there are some possible applications for
cloning which are more controversial. First among this of course is its
application in humans, which has been proposed by doctors in some
centres. British scientists are strongly opposed to this, with the possible
exception of some medically rare conditions in which cloning might be
the only route by which a woman might be able to have a child carrying
her own genes.
Assignment 2. In the popular scientific article on linguistics comment on
the specific language means that help make ordinary people interested in the
academic subject in question.
from “Forum”, July 1994
In the days before oxygen was discovered and before its role in
combustion had been explained, fire was considered by the natural
scientists to be an element, one of the four (the others were earth, air and
water) which made up all things. The ordinary uneducated man was not
concerned with such theories, of course. He saw fire as a familiar,
important, and necessary phenomenon, and he knew in a practical way
how to make it serve him. Its nature, however, was entirely mysterious to
him – and to the experts as well, one might say, but at least they had
a traditional theory by which they tried to explain it.
It is much the same with language today. Everybody uses it,
everybody is interested in it, and most people have quite strong opinions
about it. But very few people have any understanding of it in the
scientific sense, and there is a large body of traditional theory, largely
discredited, that is handed down in the schools and is called upon by the
ordinary man when he needs guidance in language matter. This is
a great pity, because linguistic scientists have made many discoveries

70
Part II. FUNCTIONAL STYLISTICS
in recent years, and the falseness of many popular notions about
language has been revealed. But old traditions die hard. There is always
a time lag between the announcement of a scientific discovery and its
acceptance by the general public.
What are some of the general truths about language that linguistic
science suggests to us? Let us consider four points only, out of many that
could be mentioned.
First, speech is not an instinctive thing in human beings, however
necessary it may be to their survival or even to their becoming human in
the first place. Every infant learns its native language from the people
around it in its early years. That means that any normal child can learn
any language; heredity has nothing to do with it.
Second, the average six-years-old had complete control of the sound
system and the basic grammar of his dialect of his native language. This
statement usually shocks educators, who think it implies that the child
does not need instruction in his native language. They misunderstand its
implications and its limitations. Of course, the young child does not know
all the vocabulary of his language, nor has he mastered the more
complicated rhetorical device available in its literary dialect. But he
knows a great deal more than most educators give him credit for knowing.
He knows all the basic grammar patterns (even though he may make an
occasional mistake in detail, like saying those sheeps or we have took)
and there is no sound in the dialect of the language that he speaks that he
cannot make himself or discriminate when he hears others make it. This
is a tremendous accomplishment.
Third, all languages are about equally complex, and no language has
ever been found, no matter how primitive the people speaking it, that was
any way incomplete or defective in its grammatical structure. This
statement is also hard for most people to believe. They insist that primitive
people must speak primitive languages, and that the prestige languages
of the earth must somehow be superior. To the linguist this makes no
sense, because he can find no scientific way of demonstrating that one
language is more logical or poetic, or pleasing, than any other. All such
judgements are illogical and are based on non-linguistic factors.
Finally, linguistic science insists that language and writing are not the
same thing, that speech always precedes writing and the latter, important
Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]
