Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5221_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
21 Мб
Скачать
1
The Psychiatric Phenomena
of Encephalitis Lethargica
Paul Bernard Foley
Introduction
In early 1917, Constantin von Economo dened encephalitis lethargica on the basis of seven patients he had attended in the Psychiatric and Neurological Clinic in Vienna. One hundred thousand cases were subsequently documented around the world, most in Europe and North America, but the number of mild and asymptomatic infections was at least an order of magnitude larger. e largest single outbreak, in the United Kingdom in 1924, was followed by its surprising disappearance as an epidemic disease. Its pathogen was never identied; both major suspects, the inuenza and herpes sim­plex viruses, had been eliminated as candidates by 1930. Mortality varied between out­breaks, but the overall level during 1917 through 1924 was about 20 percent.
e oen- bizarre symptomatology of acute encephalitis lethargica— dominated in 1917 by lethargy and oculomotor pareses, but supplanted from 1920 by contrast­ingly hyperkinetic features— persisted for days to months. For survivors, this was just the beginning: recovery was rarely complete, and few resumed their former lives, enduring instead a debilitating condition, “pseudo- neurasthenia,” characterized by restiveness and mental torpor. A few months or years aer the acute illness, their sit­uation deteriorated yet further, as post- encephalitic parkinsonism rapidly crippled people decades too young for classical Parkinson’s disease (Foley, 2017; Stern, 1928; von Economo, 1931).
Although its neuropathology was limited to the brainstem, encephalitis lethargica also attacked the mind. Its diverse and oen baing psychiatric symptoms provoked confusion and vigorous discussion throughout the 1920s and 1930s, challenging the dichotomy of organic and functional mental disorders.
The mental symptoms of acute encephalitis lethargica
e relatively innocuous impairment of consciousness during acute encephalitis le­thargica (and the absence of marked fever) distinguished it from other acute infec­tious and toxic disorders. Despite the peculiar lethargy for which the disorder was

Paul Bernard Foley, The Psychiatric Phenomena of Encephalitis Lethargica In: Medicine

DOI: 10.1093/ oso/ 9780192870414.003.0002
 Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
named, the “sleeper” could generally be easily roused, was immediately oriented, and could answer questions intelligently; they also woke spontaneously to eat or use the toilet. Consciousness was only mildly impaired by an occupational delirium in which they picked at their bedclothes or repeated pointless hand movements. Vague anx­iety before or during the acute illness was sometimes reported, but profound indif­ference was typical, as described by a French military physician admitted to hospital in Paris: “I saw those attending to me hurrying around; I was aware of their concern and sometimes, despite their discretion, their sorrow. I was neither moved nor fright­ened by it . . . all my senses were preserved, but I felt no emotion, I witnessed my end as a spectator” (Delater, 1920, p. 317). In a state described as “lucid catatonic stupor” (Hesnard, 1920, p. 449), people could be suddenly immobilized in the middle of an ac­tion without consciousness being aected, despite their impassive face and muteness. Some patients experienced hallucinations they knew to be illusions, oen toward eve­ning or only when they closed their eyes (e.g., Geimanovich, 1927; Lhermitte, 1932).
Between acute and chronic encephalitis lethargica: The pseudo- neurasthenic phase
Even aer the acute symptoms had subsided, the recovered person and their families oen felt they were no longer the person they once were. Mental exhaustion, irrita­bility, apathy, and a general loss of initiative remained; they dgeted and wandered about aimlessly, driven by psychomotor restlessness (akathisia). eir intelligence and memory were unharmed, but they seemed slow, forgetful, or withdrawn because they needed to concentrate on everything they did. Few could return to work, partic­ularly to mentally or physically demanding occupations, and unemployment added to the general frustration and mild depression that typied their mood (Calligaris, 1926; Hesnard, 1920; Mäkelä, 1923; Parsons, 1928; Stern, 1928, pp. 186– 190).
e vagueness of these signs and symptoms could be dismissed as nothing more serious than indications of a tedious recovery, or of conscious or unconscious malingering; they might be ignored altogether if the acute phase had not been rec­ognized, but the further evolution of the illness sadly claried their signicance. In certain respects, the pseudo- neurasthenic phase of encephalitis lethargica resem­bled later chronic fatigue or post- viral fatigue syndromes, as well as some aspects of the more recent “post- Covid condition,” the nature of which is as yet incompletely dened (Soriano et al., 2022).
Nocturnal excitation crises and the post­encephalitic behavioral syndrome in children
Children recovering from acute encephalitis lethargica were also restless, but in much more dynamic fashion. ey experienced sometimes manic “excitation crises”
Encephalitis Lethargica 11
each evening (agrypnia): they were in motion throughout the night, muttering and singing to themselves, running around, plucking and tearing at things, sucking and chewing, touching and re- arranging objects, or dressing themselves to go outside to play; some spat or defecated on the oor and smeared their beds and walls. e few hours they slept during the day were never enough to overcome the weariness that dissipated only as night fell (Findlay & Shiskin, 1921; Hofstadt, 1921).
e intensity of the nocturnal crises ebbed within a few months, but they were succeeded by mental and behavioral changes that ranged from emotional lability to abrupt and radical shis in character and behavior “otherwise seen only in the var­ious forms of severe congenital psychopathy” (Hofstadt, 1923, p. 1761). e children were now disobedient, aggressive, and unable to control their emotions or impulses. Most observers concurred that such children would be unduly punished or spoiled if le with their families; in any case, many parents felt compelled to seek outside as­sistance, particularly those in overcrowded homes, where family life might be com­pletely destroyed (Auden, 1925; Parsons, 1928).
e post- encephalitis behavioral syndrome was characterized by emotional vol­atility, reduced ability to concentrate, and heightened sensitivity to external stimuli (hypervigilance). Some children were mildly euphoric and mentally and physically hyperactive, but sometimes depressed and irritable; others were withdrawn and dis­contented, and oen depressed or anxious; yet others were sociable to the point of clinginess and eager to impress their doctors, but subject to explosive outbursts of unmotivated anger or despair. ree phenomena attracted particular attention (re­viewed by Auden, 1925; Kirschbaum, 1921; Neustadt, 1927; Dawson & Conn, 1931; Stallybrass, 1926; Stern, 1924).
Psychomotor hyperactivity (hyperphrenia) encompassed the compulsion to move, to touch and handle everything (and everyone) in sight, to incessantly chatter in repetitive mixtures of conversation, enquiry, and displays of “cleverness,” to touch and hit themselves and others, to tear at their clothes, and to recklessly act upon each and every impulse as it arose. e activity suggested a grotesque exaggeration of normal age- related behavior but oen seemed cheerless and forced. Respiratory tics, continuous coughing, and paroxysmal snorting were common, as were other repet­itive behaviors, such as nose picking, head rocking, nger snapping, blowing on n­gers, and awkward gaits (Jellie, 1927b; Leyser, 1924; Parsons, 1928; iele, 1926).
Changes in personality were determined by the irritability, emotional lability, and impulsiveness of the child, manifested as a thoughtlessly antisocial demeanor that oen contrasted with their pre- illness disposition. In contrast to psychopaths, the children were still conscious of what was acceptable, but were not guided by this knowledge; inappropriate behavior reected their reduced capacity for resisting motor and mental impulses (Bond & Appel, 1931; Borthwick, 1926).
Finally, attention decits could be so severe that defective memory and intelli­gence might be suspected, although some children could casually recall overheard conversations or radio programs verbatim, albeit not always with understanding. But their diculties in sustaining voluntary focus contributed to their impulsiveness
 Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
and their uncontrolled responses to both external stimuli and their own uid emo­tional life (Fleck, 1927).
Infants who contracted encephalitis lethargica generally exhibited intellectual decits, but whether intelligence suered in older children was ercely debated. Psychomotor restlessness and attention problems (and, in many cases, parkin­sonism) hampered both schooling and formal intelligence testing that required fo­cused performance and the timely cooperation of the child. Sympathetic examiners, however, oen found that intelligence, judgment, and imagination were reasonably normal even in children uninterested in acquiring new knowledge or skills (Auden, 1925; Dawson & Conn, 1931; Lange, 1934; Parsons, 1928; iele, 1926).
More disturbing were problems of a sexual or violent nature. Psychosexual devel­opment could be accelerated (or halted) as early as the agrypnia phase, but sexual urges were not always accompanied by the physical maturation required to act upon them. Public masturbation, exhibitionism, and indecent language and gestures were common, particularly among girls (Runge, 1928). Violence was impulsive and opportunistic rather than purposeful, oen the result of momentary curiosity; an 8- year- old boy, for example, pushed another into the harbor “just to see someone drown” (Runge, 1928, p. 604). Cruelty to animals was popular, as were vandalism, pyromania, and other acts of destruction; older children might commit criminal acts, including rape and murder, but minor delinquency was more typical (Auden, 1925; Hall, 1939; Runge, 1928; Wimmer, 1930). Self- mutilation included compulsive picking at the skin wounds typical for encephalitis lethargica, sometimes leading to perforation of the nose or cheek, gnawing of lips, ngers, or toes, or, as extreme ex­amples, teeth extraction and enucleation or complete removal of eyes (Goodhart & Savitsky, 1933).
Other antisocial manifestations included impulsive stealing (kleptomania), whereby the usefulness of the stolen items played no role; in any case, they were usu­ally abandoned shortly aer their capture. Impulsive lying, running away and aim­less wandering, and Witzelsucht- like behavior (pathologic inability to be serious) were generally irritating rather than consequential (Auden, 1925; Neustadt, 1927; Royal Society of Medicine, 1925; iele, 1926).
e unstable temperament of children and young adults aer encephalitis lethar­gica caused diculties both for them and for those around them. Impulsive anti­social acts— including vagrancy, the, assault, and sexual misbehavior— drew the attention of social and legal commentators, but trivial transgressions were more fre­quent than serious crimes. e legal status of children aer encephalitis lethargica was nevertheless discussed in many countries. e British Ministry of Health noted in 1924 that “it is possible that some instances of motiveless crime and of violent be­havior are the result of this disease, and not, as might be supposed, of inherent vice” (Ministry of Health, 1924); e Times reported this nding under the title, “A disease which makes criminals” (Medical Correspondent, 1924). e United Kingdom Mental Deciency Act (1913) was subsequently amended to recognize that people of any age might be rendered legally incompetent by encephalitis lethargica, and in
Encephalitis Lethargica 13
most European countries similar insights prevailed. A variety of behavioral, psy­chological, and pharmacological approaches (primarily sedation) were tried in spe­cial institutions for children with post- encephalitic behavioral problems, without marked success (Foley, 2012, pp. 449– 461).
e restiveness of the behavioral syndrome was driven by an “utterly amorphous, objective, and non- directional discharge tendency” (iele, 1926, p. 55), in con­trast to genuine compulsions, in which achieving a specic goal provides tempo­rary relief. e child acted thoughtlessly, but not selshly. ey rarely attempted to conceal their misdeeds, whether mischievous or more serious, and were genuinely remorseful aerward; they did not attempt to justify themselves and oen confessed to undiscovered misdeeds. Children described their inability to resist urges they perceived as external to themselves, but not as voices or hallucinations. With time, however, the once unremitting turmoil was broken by ever longer phases of crit­ical insight and regret (Bostroem, 1930; Gerstmann & Kauders, 1924; Leyser, 1924; Menger, 1929; iele, 1926).
e behavioral and mental changes in children with encephalitis lethargica were suciently consistent and distinct from other conditions to identify their eti­ology. Nascent schizophrenia might be considered in the dierential diagnosis, but hypersalivation, moist eyes, and a history of sleep problems were usually sucient to clarify the diagnosis, even when the acute illness had been missed. One in ten adults experienced similar behavioral changes following acute encephalitis lethargica, but it was assumed that immaturity of the adolescent brain explained their greater fre­quency in children (Bonhoeer, 1922; Ebaugh, 1923; Gerstmann & Kauders, 1924; Homburger, 1926; Lange, 1934; Neustadt, 1932).
Once the children reached the age of 15 or 16 years, parkinsonism began to limit their ability to act on momentary impulses. However, observers could be astonished by the persistence of hyperactivity, if in a new guise: “they seem as sti as an autom­aton, they run without signicant associated arm movements, more doll- like, like a wind- up music box, to then fall more or less rapidly into immobility when the impulse to move has expired” (Hofstadt, 1923, p. 1759). Even as adults with severe parkinsonism, they could remain roguish and spirited, as shown by some of the resi­dents of the New York Beth Abram Hospital temporarily liberated by L- DOPA (le­vodopa, L- 3,4- dihydroxyphenylalanine) in the early 1970s (Sacks, 1991). Persistent behavioral problems of a more serious nature were possible (see, e.g., Makowski,
1983) and in some institutions justied almost continuous sedation or even frontal lobotomy (Wilson et al., 1952).
Other attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders
e hyperkinetic condition in young children described by Franz Kramer and Hans Pollnow in 1932, now regarded as the rst report on the attention decit/ hy­peractivity disorder, shared some features with the post- encephalitic behavioral
 Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
syndrome but lacked marked neurologic symptoms and had a better prognosis (Kramer & Pollnow, 1932). While the post- encephalitis behavioral syndrome might have been accommodated in the International Classication of Diseases (ICD)- 10 category “Habit and impulse disorders” (F63)— “characterized by repeated acts that have no clear rational motivation and that generally harm the patient’s own inter­ests and those of other people. e patient reports that the behavior is associated with impulses to action that cannot be controlled” (World Health Organization, 1992, p. 517)— the ICD- 11 category “Impulse control disorders” would exclude it as the patient does not nd the behavior rewarding even initially (World Health Organization, 2022).
The mental symptoms of chronic encephalitis lethargica in adults
Parkinsonism dominated chronic encephalitis lethargica in adults, but psychi­atric and other mental problems were also prominent. As for children, there was no compelling evidence that pre- illness factors inuenced the risk of psychiatric symptoms. Two related phenomena were characteristic of chronic encephalitis le­thargica: bradyphrenia and impaired volition.
People with chronic encephalitis lethargica complained that their thoughts no longer owed freely, that concentration was dicult, and that they experienced states in which they “had no sense of their own existence” (Bychowski, 1923, p. 213). Sensory input and interactions with others lacked emotional coloring, leading to a certain “forgetfulness” and disinterest, to the extent that many seemed unaware of the gravity of their illness. In 1922, Swiss neuropsychiatrist François Naville introduced “bradyphrenia” (from Greek, “slow mind”) to encompass this combination of mental viscosity and apparent apathy, unique to encephalitis le­thargica (Naville, 1922). People with bradyphrenia found directing their atten­tion arduous, making it dicult to respond to internal or external stimuli and crushing creativity; “they collapse into themselves, their relationships are reduced to a strict minimum, all their needs seem diminished, their instincts of sociability and their moral personality atrophied, their initiative destroyed, their mind slum­bers, nothing concerns them, everything tires them, and their will, however well preserved, ultimately capitulates” (Naville, 1924, p. 42). Another Swiss neuropsy­chiatrist, Hans Steck, saw bradyphrenia as an impairment of psychomotor execu­tive power characterized by mental fatigability and apathy that ultimately levelled the entire personality (Steck, 1931). Cognition was stalled by perseveration and the perceived need to “want” to think. Response times in tests of free association and other psychological tests were longer, modifying a response was dicult once started, and concentration quickly agged. Situational factors could temporarily overcome bradyphrenia; otherwise slow- moving patients might play cards with spirit, for example (Fleck, 1930).
Encephalitis Lethargica 15
e personal impact was devastating, as described by one 22- year- old man: “ere is no action for which I did not consider every consequence . . . every bodily process, such as sneezing, coughing, and even thinking, lled me with passionate curiosity as to how this process worked . . . Any thought that would normally be only mildly discomforting, that one usually overcomes without eort, causes me this feeling of anxiety” (Mayer- Gross & Steiner, 1921, pp. 288, 294). e young man undertook nothing with enthusiasm or pleasure; he felt more like a spectator than a participant in his own life. Less frequent was a sensation of mental acceleration, similar to the drivenness typical for children with encephalitis lethargica. e French doctor men­tioned previously noted 28 years aer his acute illness that it was “as if I am under pressure and about to burst, especially when I have to express something that inter­ests or moves me; I speak volubly and cannot take time to think, I rush feverishly to the end of what I have started, towards something uncertain, and am vaguely anx­ious that my power [to speak] might suddenly fail me” (Delater, 1948, p. 230). Some people found that what they saw, heard, or felt— the ticking of a watch, the sound of a passing tram, or an odor, for example— persisted for longer than was objectively justied (for instance, Novelli & Quagliotti, 1929). Bradyphrenia shared some fea­tures with “subcortical dementia” later described in progressive supranuclear palsy (Albert et al., 1974) and the “obsessional slowness” of obsessive– compulsive dis­order (Hymas et al., 1991).
About one in three people with post- encephalitic parkinsonism experienced bradyphrenia, usually before motor symptoms developed. Some authors never­theless argued that it was the conscious eort invested in motor performance that was the primary problem; as mental and motor activities once silently facilitated by unconscious automatisms now required their full attention, nothing proceeded as smoothly or as quickly as it once did. With time, bradyphrenia deepened to aki­nesia, and the blockage of thought ow could no longer be overcome by conscious strategies.
Many authors regarded a related phenomenon, “decit of drive,” as a distinct ele­ment of chronic encephalitis lethargica and distinguished two types of volitional def­icit. In the rst, a person asked to wipe their nose responded slowly, and the action might break down at any point; in the second, even a delayed response, once begun, would proceed smoothly. For people in the rst group, emotional indierence meant that many stimuli had neither the emotive content nor the motivating eects they once did; for example, an itch was still unpleasant, but the attempt to relieve it was slow and uncoordinated, or they could recognize the beauty of a musical perfor­mance without being moved by it. e problem might be overcome by increasing the emotional content of the stimulus; danger and the insistence of a doctor or rel­ative were particularly eective, or even specically imagining such motivators to enable a response. In people with the second type of drive decit, their deeper apathy hindered conscious registration of stimuli and compromised even the initiation of decision- making. Patients in the rst group were less oppressed by their illness than those in the second, and they retained a remarkably rich internal life, despite the
 Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
gradual “rusting” of their thought processes (Bostroem, 1930; Hauptmann, 1922; Runge, 1928; van der Scheer, 1936; reviewed by Foley, 2012).
People with chronic encephalitis lethargica seemed emotionally detached, but some explained they would be more expressive if their volitional and motor prob­lems had allowed it; indeed, some wrote aectionate letters to loved ones they clearly missed (Jakob, 1923, pp. 200– 201). Oliver Sacks similarly recorded the general se­renity of his patients in the early 1970s, several decades aer the acute illness; they were curiously unperturbed by their situation when temporarily “awakened” by L­DOPA, although fully cognizant of lost time (Sacks, 1991). Irregular emotional and petulant outbursts directed at people or property reected underlying irritability, but these transitory eruptions (comparable with those of the behavioral syndrome in children) oen subsided because the patient recognized they were irrational. Depression was relatively unusual and typically related to feelings of personal in­adequacy rather than despair, although many people calmly expressed sorrow when questioned about their illness (Fleck, 1927; Geimanovich, 1927; Paulian & Stanesco, 1932). Suicide was less common than earlier in the illness, but suicidal thoughts were occasionally sucient to break through the akinesia of parkin­sonism (Fleck, 1933).
e typical importunity or clinginess of chronic encephalitis lethargica, together with “pathologic curiosity” and “pathologic lack of boredom,” extended to the irk­somely incessant pestering of hospital sta with repeated questions; some patients meticulously monitored everything that happened around them, whether in hos­pital or at home (Chodos, 1933; Jacob- Klener, 1934).
Adults, including people with advanced parkinsonism, could also experience the impulsive motor activity and akathisia seen in children aer acute encephalitis lethargica. Compulsive thoughts, usually associated with compulsive motor phe­nomena, were oen rhythmic in nature (melodies, short repetitive phrases) and less meaningful than in other psychiatric disorders, but some were more disturbing, including incitements to socially inappropriate or dangerous behavior. As in chil­dren, the thoughts were perceived as intrusive and foreign, but not usually as voices (Bostroem, 1930; Chłopicki, 1931; Kehrer, 1938; Runge, 1928; Stern, 1928). Speech­related compulsions included palilalia (including the repetition of heard speech or silent lm card text), screaming or shouting (klazomania), and compulsive singing, whistling, and humming (Benedek, 1925; von urzó & Katona, 1927).
Oculogyric crises
Oculogyric crises were a complex, spectacular neuropsychiatric phenomenon that aicted 15– 20 percent of people with post- encephalitic parkinsonism but were otherwise unknown and clearly dierent from recognized ocular palsies. Every few days or weeks, foreshadowed by a short period of vague apprehension or depres­sion, both eyes of an aected person rolled up until only the lower iris was visible;
Encephalitis Lethargica 17
their neck arched backwards (opisthotonos), their mouth gaped open, and their extrapyramidal and vegetative symptoms, including hypersalivation, intensied. During the attack, a person could force their eyes down for only a few seconds. e episodes were initially brief but could later last several hours, usually starting in the late aernoon or evening and ending only when the person fell asleep nat­urally (i.e., without pharmacological aid) (Delbeke & van Bogaert, 1928; Ewald, 1925; Jellie, 1932; McCowan & Cook, 1928b; Onuaguluchi, 1961; Stern, 1927; Walusinski, 2022).
An integral part of the attack was the alteration of mental state that commenced before the ocular manifestations. Compulsive, oppressive thoughts caused deep anx­iety and a frightening “sensation of annihilation,” seizing control of consciousness in a state described by one man as “something between speaking and thinking” (Stern, 1927, p. 528): his head was lled with senseless words and sentence fragments, his thought processes xed to the spot. e thoughts were typically nonsensical and re­petitive (e.g., counting the vowels in conversations not otherwise heeded) and oen rhythmic (e.g., children’s songs, mathematical sequences). Some people developed strategies to temporarily reassert control; for instance, one man compelled to re­cite “how, why, what for, what” could escape by thinking “Depart from this place, Satan, for Jesus is mine,” but “nding” this thought could itself be dicult (Stern, 1927, p. 530). Others were overwhelmed by a ood of oppressively banal memories. Whatever thoughts engulfed them, voluntary concentration and cognition was im­possible throughout the attack, and they might consequently respond with irritation to anyone who asked them questions or made demands.
Altered perception of time or space, local or generalized anesthesia or pares­thesias, visual (less oen auditory or tactile) hallucinations recognized as delu­sions, and distortions of body perception frequently accompanied the attacks, as did a sense of heightened consciousness similar to the aura of epilepsy (and also reported by some people outside of oculogyric crises). Oculogyric crises could be “contagious” on a hospital ward (in the sense that yawning can be “con­tagious”), but only among people who already experienced such attacks (Delbeke & van Bogaert, 1928; Marinesco et al., 1925; Stern, 1928, p. 166; van Bogaert & Delbeke, 1926).
Contemporary authors could not satisfactorily explain the genesis of oculogyric crises but suspected the involvement of dissociated sleep phenomena or disturbed vestibular function (or both). Comparisons were drawn with “subcortical attacks”— characterized by an aura, motor, sensory, vegetative, and mental symptoms, and par­oxysmal features such as cataplexy and narcolepsy— thought to reect the liberation of behavioral automatisms and elementary basal ganglia and brainstem motor pat­terns from higher control (Zingerle, 1936). Oculogyric crises have since been ob­served in patients treated with various psychoactive medications, chiey dopamine D2 receptor antagonists, and occasionally in other neurological conditions (Slow & Lang, 2017). eir pathogenesis probably involves dopamine receptor hypersensi­tivity, but the phenomenon is still only incompletely understood.