Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5221_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
21 Мб
Скачать
 Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
FAIZ, K., VIEIRA, E. L. & MEYER, J. H. 2023. Neuroinammation aer COVID- 19 with persistent depressive and cognitive symptoms. JAMA Psychiatry, 80, 787– 795.
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION. 2023a. Provisional Covid- 19 Deaths by
Sex and Age [Online]. Available: https:// data.cdc.gov/ NCHS/ Prov isio nal- COVID- 19- Dea ths- by­Sex- and- Age/ 9bhg- hcku [Accessed December 1, 2023].
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION. 2023b. SARS- CoV- 2 Variant
Classications and Denitions [Online]. Available: https:// www.cdc.gov/ coro navi rus/ 2019- ncov/ varia nts/ vari ant- clas si cati ons.html [Accessed June 8, 2024].
CHAN, J. F., KOK, K. H., ZHU, Z., CHU, H., TO, K. K., YUAN, S. & YUEN, K. Y. 2020. Genomic char-
acterization of the 2019 novel human- pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia aer visiting Wuhan. Emerg Microbes Infect, 9, 221– 236.
CHEN, Y., YANG, W., CHEN, F. & CUI, L. 2022. COVID- 19 and cognitive impairment: Neuroinvasive
and blood‒brain barrier dysfunction. J Neuroinammation, 19, 222.
CHEVINSKY, J. R., TAO, G. Y., LAVERY, A. M., KUKIELKA, E. A., CLICK, E. S., MALEC, D.,
KOMPANIYETS, L., BRUCE, B. B., YUSUF, H., GOODMAN, A. B., DIXON, M. G., NAKAO, J. H., DATTA, S. D., MACKENZIE, W. R., KADRI, S. S., SAYDAH, S., GIOVANNI, J. E. & GUNDLAPALLI, A. V. 2021. Late conditions diagnosed 1– 4 months following an initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) encounter: A matched- cohort study using inpatient and outpatient ad­ministrative data- United States, 1 March– 30 June 2020. Clin Infect Dis, 73, S5– S16.
CHO, S. M., WHITE, N., PREMRAJ, L., BATTAGLINI, D., FANNING, J., SUEN, J., BASSI, G. L.,
FRASER, J., ROBBA, C., GRIFFEE, M., SINGH, B., CITARELLA, B. W., MERSON, L., SOLOMON, T., THOMSON, D. & ISARIC CLINICAL CHARACTERISATION GROUP. 2023. Neurological manifestations of COVID- 19 in adults and children. Brain, 146, 1648– 1661.
CRIVELLI, L., PALMER, K., CALANDRI, I., GUEKHT, A., BEGHI, E., CARROLL, W., FRONTERA,
J., GARCIA- AZORIN, D., WESTENBERG, E., WINKLER, A. S., MANGIALASCHE, F., ALLEGRI, R. F. & KIVIPELTO, M. 2022. Changes in cognitive functioning aer COVID- 19: A systematic re­view and meta- analysis. Alzheimers Dement, 18, 1047– 1066.
CUI, J., LI, F. & SHI, Z. L. 2019. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol,
17, 181– 192.
DAVIS, H. E., ASSAF, G. S., MCCORKELL, L., WEI, H., LOW, R. J., RE’EM, Y., REDFIELD, S., AUSTIN,
J. P. & AKRAMI, A. 2021. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symp­toms and their impact. Eclinicalmedicine, 38, 101019.
DE SOUSA, V. L., ARAÚJO, S. B., ANTONIO, L. M., SILVA- QUEIROZ, M., COLODETI, L. C.,
SOARES, C., BARROS- ARAGAO, F., MOTA- ARAUJO, H. P., ALVES, V. S., COUTINHO- SILVA, R., SAVIO, L. E. B., FERREIRA, S. T., DA COSTA, R., CLARKE, J. R. & FIGUEIREDO, C. P. 2021. Innate immune memory mediates increased susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease- like pathology in sepsis surviving mice. Brain Behav Immun, 95, 287– 298.
DESFORGES, M., LE COUPANEC, A., DUBEAU, P., BOURGOUIN, A., LAJOIE, L., DUBE, M. &
TALBOT, P. J. 2019. Human coronaviruses and other respiratory viruses: Underestimated opportun­istic pathogens of the central nervous system? Virus es, 12, 14.
DOUAUD, G., LEE, S., ALFARO- ALMAGRO, F., ARTHOFER, C., WANG, C. Y., MCCARTHY,
P., LANGE, F., ANDERSSON, J. L. R., GRIFFANTI, L., DUFF, E., JBABDI, S., TASCHLER, B., KEATING, P., WINKLER, A. M., COLLINS, R., MATTHEWS, P. M., ALLEN, N., MILLER, K. L., NICHOLS, T. E. & SMITH, S. M. 2022. SARS- CoV- 2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank. Nature, 604, 697– 707.
ELLUL, M. A., BENJAMIN, L., SINGH, B., LANT, S., MICHAEL, B. D., EASTON, A., KNEEN, R.,
DEFRES, S., SEJVAR, J. & SOLOMON, T. 2020. Neurological associations of COVID- 19. Lancet Neurol, 19, 767– 783.
ERMIS, U., RUST, M. I., BUNGENBERG, J., COSTA, A., DREHER, M., BALFANZ, P., MARX, G.,
WIESMANN, M., REETZ, K., TAUBER, S. C. & SCHULZ, J. B. 2021. Neurological symptoms in COVID- 19: A cross- sectional monocentric study of hospitalized patients. Neurol Res Pract, 3, 17.
FERNANDO, M. S., SIMPSON, J. E., MATTHEWS, F., BRAYNE, C., LEWIS, C. E., BARBER, R.,
KALARIA, R. N., FORSTER, G., ESTEVES, F., WHARTON, S. B., SHAW, P. J., O’BRIEN, J. T., INCE, P. G., & MRC COGNITIVE FUNCTION AND AGEING NEUROPATHOLOGY STUDY GROUP.
Covid-19 59
2006. White matter lesions in an unselected cohort of the elderly: Molecular pathology suggests or­igin from chronic hypoperfusion injury. Stroke, 37, 1391– 1398.
FOTUHI, M., MIAN, A., MEYSAMI, S. & RAJI, C. A. 2020. Neurobiology of COVID- 19. J Alzheimers
Dis, 76, 3– 19.
FROST, P. S., BARROS- ARAGAO, F., DA SILVA, R. T., VENANCIO, A., MATIAS, I., SILVA, N.
M. L. E., KINCHESKI, G. C., PIMENTEL- COELHO, P. M., DE FELICE, F. G., GOMES, F. C. A., FERREIRAIEI, S. T., FIGUEIREDO, C. P. & CLARKE, J. R. 2019. Neonatal infection leads to in­creased susceptibility to Aβ oligomer- induced brain inammation, synapse loss and cognitive im­pairment in mice. Cell Death Dis, 10, 323.
GIRARD, T. D., THOMPSON, J. L., PANDHARIPANDE, P. P., BRUMMEL, N. E., JACKSON, J. C.,
PATEL, M. B., HUGHES, C. G., CHANDRASEKHAR, R., PUN, B. T., BOEHM, L. M., ELSTAD, M. R., GOODMAN, R. B., BERNARD, G. R., DITTUS, R. S. & ELY, E. W. 2018. Clinical phenotypes of delirium during critical illness and severity of subsequent long- term cognitive impairment: A pro­spective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med, 6, 213– 222.
GRASSELLI, G., ZANGRILLO, A., ZANELLA, A., ANTONELLI, M., CABRINI, L., CASTELLI,
A., CEREDA, D., COLUCCELLO, A., FOTI, G., FUMAGALLI, R., IOTTI, G., LATRONICO, N., LORINI, L., MERLER, S., NATALINI, G., PIATTI, A., RANIERI, M. V., SCANDROGLIO, A. M., STORTI, E., CECCONI, M., PESENTI, A. & COVID- 19 LOMBARDY ICU NETWORK. 2020. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS- CoV- 2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA, 323, 1574– 1581.
GREENHALGH, T., KNIGHT, M., A’COURT, C., BUXTON, M. & HUSAIN, L. 2020. Management of
post- acute covid- 19 in primary care. BMJ, 370, m3026.
GUO, Y. R., CAO, Q. D., HONG, Z. S., TAN, Y. Y., CHEN, S. D., JIN, H. J., TAN, K. S., WANG, D. Y. &
YAN, Y. 2020. e origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-
19) outbreak— An update on the status. Mil Med Res, 7, 11.
HAMPSHIRE, A., TRENDER, W., CHAMBERLAIN, S. R., JOLLY, A. E., GRANT, J. E., PATRICK, F.,
MAZIBUKO, N., WILLIAMS, S. C., BARNBY, J. M., HELLYER, P. & MEHTA, M. A. 2021. Cognitive decits in people who have recovered from COVID- 19. EClinicalMedicine, 39, 101044.
HELMS, J., KREMER, S., MERDJI, H., CLERE- JEHL, R., SCHENCK, M., KUMMERLEN, C.,
COLLANGE, O., BOULAY, C., FAFI- KREMER, S., OHANA, M., ANHEIM, M. & MEZIANI, F.
2020. Neurologic features in severe SARS- CoV- 2 infection. N Engl J Med, 382, 2268– 2270.
HOSP, J. A., DRESSING, A., BLAZHENETS, G., BORMANN, T., RAU, A., SCHWABENLAND, M.,
THUROW, J., WAGNER, D., WALLER, C., NIESEN, W. D., FRINGS, L., URBACH, H., PRINZ, M., WEILLER, C., SCHROETER, N. & MEYER, P. T. 2021. Cognitive impairment and altered cerebral glucose metabolism in the subacute stage of COVID- 19. Brain, 144, 1263– 1276.
HU, B., GUO, H., ZHOU, P. & SHI, Z. L. 2021. Characteristics of SARS- CoV- 2 and COVID- 19. Nat Rev
Microbiol, 19, 141– 154.
IQBAL, A., IQBAL, K., ALI, S. A., AZIM, D., FARID, E., BAIG, M. D., BIN ARIF, T. & RAZA, M. 2021.
e COVID- 19 sequelae: A cross- sectional evaluation of post- recovery symptoms and the need for rehabilitation of COVID- 19 survivors. Cureus, 13, e13080.
JO, M., LEE, S., JEON, Y. M., KIM, S., KWON, Y. & KIM, H. J. 2020. e role of TDP- 43 propagation
in neurodegenerative diseases: Integrating insights from clinical and experimental studies. Exp Mol Med, 52, 1652– 1662.
KANTONEN, J., MAHZABIN, S., MAYRANPAA, M. I., TYNNINEN, O., PAETAU, A., ANDERSSON,
N., SAJANTILA, A., VAPALAHTI, O., CARPÉN, O., KEKÄLÄINEN, E., KANTELE, A. & MYLLYKANGAS, L. 2020. Neuropathologic features of four autopsied COVID- 19 patients. Brain Pathol, 30, 1012– 1016.
KRISHNAN, K., LIN, Y., PREWITT, K. M. & POTTER, D. A. 2022. Multidisciplinary approach to
brain fog and related persisting symptoms post COVID- 19. J Health Serv Psychol, 48, 31– 38.
KUMAR, S., VELDHUIS, A. & MALHOTRA, T. 2021. Neuropsychiatric and cognitive sequelae of
COVID- 19. Front Psychol, 12, 577529. LAHIRI, D. & ARDILA, A. 2020. COVID- 19 pandemic: A neurological perspective. Cureus, 12, e7889. LINDLAU, A., WIDMANN, C. N., PUTENSEN, C., JESSEN, F., SEMMLER, A. & HENEKA, M. T.
2015. Predictors of hippocampal atrophy in critically ill patients. Eur J Neurol, 22, 410– 415.
 Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
LU, Y., LI, X., GENG, D., MEI, N., WU, P. Y., HUANG, C. C., JIA, T., ZHAO, Y., WANG, D., XIAO, A. &
YIN, B. 2020. Cerebral micro- structural changes in COVID- 19 patients— An MRI- based 3- month follow- up study. EClinicalMedicine, 25, 100484.
MAO, L., JIN, H., WANG, M., HU, Y., CHEN, S., HE, Q., CHANG, J., HONG, C., ZHOU, Y., WANG,
D., MIAO, X., LI, Y. & HU, B. 2020. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with corona­virus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol, 77, 683– 690.
MAZZA, M. G., DE LORENZO, R., CONTE, C., POLETTI, S., VAI, B., BOLLETTINI, I., MELLONI, E.
M. T., FURLAN, R., CICERI, F., ROVERE- QUERINI, P., COVID- 19 BIOB OUTPATIENT CLINIC STUDY GROUP & BENEDETTI, F. 2020. Anxiety and depression in COVID- 19 survivors: Role of inammatory and clinical predictors. Brain Behav Immun, 89, 594– 600.
MAZZA, M. G., PALLADINI, M., DE LORENZO, R., MAGNAGHI, C., POLETTI, S., FURLAN, R.,
CICERI, F., COVID- 19 BIOB OUTPATIENT CLINIC STUDY GROUP, ROVERE- QUERINI, P. & BENEDETTI, F. 2021. Persistent psychopathology and neurocognitive impairment in COVID- 19 survivors: Eect of inammatory biomarkers at three- month follow- up. Brain Behav Immun, 94, 138– 147.
MINERS, S., KEHOE, P. G. & LOVE, S. 2020. Cognitive impact of COVID- 19: Looking beyond the
short term. Alzheimers Res er, 12, 170.
MIRFAZELI, F. S., SARABI- JAMAB, A., JAHANBAKHSHI, A., KORDI, A., JAVADNIA, P., SHARIAT,
S. V., ALOOSH, O., ALMASI- DOOGHAEE, M. & FAIZ, S. H. R. 2020. Neuropsychiatric manifest­ations of COVID- 19 can be clustered in three distinct symptom categories. Sci Rep, 10, 20957.
MISKOWIAK, K. W., JOHNSEN, S., SATTLER, S. M., NIELSEN, S., KUNALAN, K., RUNGBY, J.,
LAPPERRE, T. & PORSBERG, C. M. 2021. Cognitive impairments four months aer COVID- 19 hos­pital discharge: Pattern, severity and association with illness variables. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 46, 39– 48.
MIZRAHI, B., SUDRY, T., FLAKS- MANOV, N., YEHEZKELLI, Y., KALKSTEIN, N., AKIVA, P.,
EKKA- ZOHAR, A., BEN DAVID, S. S., LERNER, U., BIVAS- BENITA, M. & GREENFELD, S. 2023. Long covid outcomes at one year aer mild SARS- CoV- 2 infection: Nationwide cohort study. BMJ, 380, e072529.
MONTALVAN, V., LEE, J., BUESO, T., DE TOLEDO, J. & RIVAS, K. 2020. Neurological manifestations
of COVID- 19 and other coronavirus infections: A systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 194,
105921.
MOSKOWITZ, M. A., LO, E. H. & IADECOLA, C. 2010. e science of stroke: Mechanisms in search
of treatments. Neuron, 67, 181– 198.
NAKAMURA, Z. M., NASH, R. P., LAUGHON, S. L. & ROSENSTEIN, D. L. 2021. Neuropsychiatric
complications of COVID- 19. Curr Psychiatry Rep, 23, 25.
NERSESJAN, V., FONSMARK, L., CHRISTENSEN, R. H. B., AMIRI, M., MERIE, C., LEBECH, A. M.,
KATZENSTEIN, T., BANG, L. E., KJÆRGAARD, J., KONDZIELLA, D. & BENROS, M. E. 2022. Neuropsychiatric and cognitive outcomes in patients 6 months aer COVID- 19 requiring hospi­talization compared with matched control patients hospitalized for non- COVID- 19 illness. JAMA Psychiatry, 79, 486– 497.
ORTELLI, P., FERRAZZOLI, D., SEBASTIANELLI, L., ENGL, M., ROMANELLO, R., NARDONE,
R., BONINI, I., KOCH, G., SALTUARI, L. & QUARTARONE, A. 2021. Neuropsychological and neurophysiological correlates of fatigue in post- acute patients with neurological manifestations of COVID- 19: Insights into a challenging symptom. J Neurol Sci, 420, 117271.
OTANI, K., FUKUSHIMA, H. & MATSUISHI, K. (2023). COVID- 19 delirium and encephalop-
athy: Pathophysiology assumed in the rst 3 years of the ongoing pandemic. Brain Disorders, 10,
100074.
OUSSALAH, A., GLEYE, S., URMES, I. C., LAUGEL, E., BARBÉ, F., ORLOWSKI, S., MALAPLATE,
C., AIMONE- GASTIN, I., CAILLIEREZ, B. M., MERTEN, M., JEANNESSON, E., KORMANN, R., OLIVIER, J. L., RODRIGUEZ- GUÉANT, R. M., NAMOUR, F., BEVILACQUA, S., THILLY, N., LOSSER, M. R., KIMMOUN, A., FRIMAT, L., LEVY, B., GIBOT, S., SCHVOERER, E. & GUÉANT, J. L. 2020. e spectrum of biochemical alterations associated with organ dysfunction and inamma­tory status and their association with disease outcomes in severe COVID- 19: A longitudinal cohort and time- series design study. Eclinicalmedicine, 27, 100554.
Covid-19 61
OUSSEIRAN, Z. H., FARES, Y. & CHAMOUN, W. T. 2023. Neurological manifestations of COVID-
19: A systematic review and detailed comprehension. Int J Neurosci, 133, 754– 769. PANTELIS, C., JAYARAM, M., HANNAN, A. J., WESSELINGH, R., NITHIANANTHARAJAH, J.,
WANNAN, C. M. J., SYEDA, W. T., CHOY, K. H. C., ZANTOMIO, D., CHRISTOPOULOS, A.,
VELAKOULIS, D. & O’BRIEN, T. J. 2021. Neurological, neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental
complications of COVID- 19. Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 55, 750– 762. PODURI, R., JOSHI, G. & JAGADEESH, G. 2020. Drugs targeting various stages of the SARS- CoV- 2
life cycle: Exploring promising drugs for the treatment of Covid- 19. Cell Signal, 74, 109721. POYIADJI, N., SHAHIN, G., NOUJAIM, D., STONE, M., PATEL, S. & GRIFFITH, B. 2020. COVID-
19– associated acute hemorrhagic necrotizing encephalopathy: Imaging features. Radiology, 296,
E119– E120. REICHARD, R. R., KASHANI, K. B., BOIRE, N. A., CONSTANTOPOULOS, E., GUO, Y. &
LUCCHINETTI, C. F. 2020. Neuropathology of COVID- 19: A spectrum of vascular and acute dis-
seminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)- like pathology. Acta Neuropathol, 140, 1– 6. ROGERS, J. P., CHESNEY, E., OLIVER, D., POLLAK, T. A., MCGUIRE, P., FUSAR- POLI, P., ZANDI,
M. S., LEWIS, G. & DAVID, A. S. 2020. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated
with severe coronavirus infections: A systematic review and meta- analysis with comparison to the
COVID- 19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry, 7, 611– 627. RUDNICKA- DROŻAK, E., DROŻAK, P., MIZERSKI, G., ZABOROWSKI, T., ŚLUSARSKA, B.,
NOWICKI, G. & DROŻAK, M. 2023. Links between COVID- 19 and Alzheimer’s disease— What do
we already know? Int J Environ Res Public Health, 20, 2146. RUDROFF, T., FIETSAM, A. C., DETERS, J. R., BRYANT, A. D. & KAMHOLZ, J. 2020. Post- COVID-
19 fatigue: Potential contributing factors. Brain Sci, 10, 1012. SASANNEJAD, C., ELY, E. W. & LAHIRI, S. 2019. Long- term cognitive impairment aer acute respira-
tory distress syndrome: A review of clinical impact and pathophysiological mechanisms. Crit Care,
23, 352. SCHOU, T. M., JOCA, S., WEGENER, G. & BAY- RICHTER, C. 2021. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric
sequelae of COVID- 19— A systematic review. Brain Behav Immun, 97, 328– 348. SOLOMON, I. H., NORMANDIN, E., BHATTACHARYYA, S., MUKERJI, S. S., KELLER, K., ALI, A.
S., ADAMS, G., HORNICK, J. L., PADERA, R. F. & SABETI, P. 2020. Neuropathological features of
Covid- 19. N Engl J Med, 383, 989– 992. SUN, L. L., WANG, J., WANG, Y. S., HU, P. F., ZHAO, Z. Q., CHEN, W., NING, B. F., YIN, C., HAO,
Y. S., WANG, Q., WANG, C., LIU, Y. L., CHEN, C., YIN, J. Z., HUANG, H. & XIE, W. F. 2021.
Symptomatic features and prognosis of 932 hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in
Wuhan. J Dig Dis, 22, 271– 281. TAQUET, M., GEDDES, J. R., HUSAIN, M., LUCIANO, S. & HARRISON, P. J. 2021. 6- month neu-
rological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID- 19: A retrospective cohort study
using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry, 8, 416– 427. TOLENTINO, J. C., GJORUP, A. L. T., SCHMIDT, G. J. & SCHMIDT, S. L. 2021. Early attention im-
pairment in a patient with COVID- 19. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 75, 66– 67. VAN DEN POL, A. N. 2009. Viral infection leading to brain dysfunction: More prevalent than appreci-
ated? Neuron, 64, 17– 20. VARATHARAJ, A., THOMAS, N., ELLUL, M. A., DAVIES, N. W. S., POLLAK, T. A., TENORIO,
E. L., SULTAN, M., EASTON, A., BREEN, G., ZANDI, M., COLES, J. P., MANJI, H., AL- SHAHI
SALMAN, R., MENON, D. K., NICHOLSON, T. R., BENJAMIN, L. A., CARSON, A., SMITH,
C., TURNER, M. R., SOLOMON, T., KNEEN, R., PETT, S. L., GALEA, I., THOMAS, R. H. &
MICHAEL, B. D. 2020. Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID- 19 in 153 pa-
tients: A UK- wide surveillance study. Lancet Psychiatry, 7, 875– 882. VASEK, M. J., GARBER, C., DORSEY, D., DURRANT, D. M., BOLLMAN, B., SOUNG, A., YU, J.,
PEREZ- TORRES, C., FROUIN, A. & WILTON, D. K. 2016. A complement– microglial axis drives
synapse loss during virus- induced memory impairment. Nature, 534, 538– 543. VENKATARAMANI, V. & WINKLER, F. 2022. Cognitive decits in long Covid- 19. N Engl J Med, 387,
1813– 1815.
 Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
VERGHESE, P. B., CASTELLANO, J. M. & HOLTZMAN, D. M. 2011. Apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer’s
disease and other neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol, 10, 241– 252.
WOO, M. S., MALSY, J., POTTGEN, J., SEDDIQ ZAI, S., UFER, F., HADJILAOU, A., SCHMIEDEL,
S., ADDO, M. M., GERLOFF, C., HEESEN, C., SCHULZE ZUR WIESCH, J. & FRIESE, M. A. 2020. Frequent neurocognitive decits aer recovery from mild COVID- 19. Brain Commun, 2, fcaa205.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. 2020. WHO Director- General’s Opening Remarks at the Media
Brieng on COVID- 19 [Online]. Available: https:// www.who.int/ direc tor- gene ral/ speec hes/ det ail/ who- direc tor- gene ral- s- open ing- rema rks- at- the- media- brie ng- on- covid- 19- - - 11- march- 2020 [Accessed December 1, 2023].
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. 2023. Coronavirus Dashboard [Online]. Available: https:// covi
d19.who.int [Accessed December 1, 2023].
WU, J. T., LEUNG, K. & LEUNG, G. M. 2020. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and
international spread of the 2019- nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: A modelling study. Lancet, 395, 689– 697.
WU, S. Y., PAN, B. S., TSAI, S. F., CHIANG, Y. T., HUANG, B. M., MO, F. E. & KUO, Y. M. 2020. BDNF
reverses aging- related microglial activation. J Neuroinammation, 17, 210.
XU, E., XIE, Y. & AL- ALY, Z. 2022. Long- term neurologic outcomes of COVID- 19. Nat Med, 28,
2406– 2415.
YANG, Y. & ROSENBERG, G. A. 2011. Blood- brain barrier breakdown in acute and chronic cerebro-
vascular disease. Stroke, 42, 3323– 3328.
YE, Q., WANG, B. L. & MAO, J. H. 2020. e pathogenesis and treatment of the ‘cytokine storm’ in
COVID- 19. J Infect, 80, 607– 613.
YUAN, P., BI, Y., LUO, Y., TAO, Q., GONG, S. G., WANG, Y., XIONG, L. Z., XIA, X. H. & ZHENG,
J. L. C. 2023. Cognitive dysfunction of patients infected with SARS- CoV- 2 omicron variant in Shanghai, China. Transl Neurodegener, 12, 28.
ZHENG, J. L., LI, G. Z., CHEN, S. Z., WANG, J. J., OLSON, J. E., XIA, H. J., LAZARTIGUES, E., ZHU,
Y. L. & CHEN, Y. F. 2014. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2/ Ang- (1– 7)/ Mas axis protects brain from ischemic injury with a tendency of age- dependence. CNS Neurosci er, 20, 452– 459.
ZHU, H. M., ZHANG, S. M., YAO, C., LUO, M. Q., MA, H. J., LEI, T., YUAN, C. H., WU, G. F., HU, J. S.,
CAI, C. Q. & LIU, Z. S. 2021. e clinical and imaging characteristics associated with neurological sequelae of pediatric patients with acute necrotizing encephalopathy. Front Pediatr, 9, 655074.
5
The Association Between Human
Cytomegalovirus and Neurocognitive
Disorders and Dementia
Guy D. Eslick
Introduction
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), also known as human betaherpesvirus 5, is a member of the Herpesviridae family of viruses (Dioverti & Razonable, 2016). It is one of the largest viruses known to cause infection with a viral particle diameter of approximately 150– 200 nm (Schottstedt et al., 2010). It is an extremely common infection worldwide with studies estimating seroprevalence rates close to 100 per­cent for Africa and Asia and lower at 50 percent in North America and 80 percent in Europe (Al Mana et al., 2019; Cannon et al., 2010). HCMV is responsible for a wide variety of clinical syndromes, which range from asymptomatic infection in healthy individuals, to severe and potentially fatal disease in immunocompromised indi­viduals (e.g., human immunodeciency virus patients, organ transplant recipients) (Lancini et al., 2014; Stewart & Kotton, 2024).
Transmission of human cytomegalovirus
Pathways of transmission
e transmission pathways for HCMV are varied and are dependent on the age of acquisi­tion. HCMV can aect any age group with transmission occurring in the following ways:
• Blood transfusion (Njeru et al., 2009)
• Organ transplantation (Silva Junior et al., 2023)
• Sexual activity (Handseld et al., 1985)
• Breastfeeding (Hu et al., 2021)
• Direct contact with urine (Delforge et al., 2017)
• Direct contact with saliva (Mayer et al., 2020)
Guy D. Eslick,
Neurocognitive and Neuropsychiatric Medicine
© Oxford University Press 2024. DOI: 10.1093/ oso/ 9780192870414.003.0006
 Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
In vitro productive infection
n y
SVZ
BBB
BBB
CNS
In vivo infection
No information on
CMV latency
In vivo infection
In vitro productive infection
Possible site of CMV latency
Ependymal cell Microglia
2b 2a
2 CNS entry
3 Infection of brain cells
In vivo infection
In vitro productive infection
No information on
CMV latency
1 Migration
No information for in vivo infection
In vitro productive infection
No information on
CMV latency
OligodendrocyteMyeloid cellPericyte
CSF SVZ
In vivo infection In vitro productive infectio Possible site of CMV latenc
NSPCsAstrocyte
CMVNeuron
Figure 5.1 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in developing brain. CMV dissemination to the central nervous system (CNS) is secondary to peripheral organ infection (1). Upon reaching the brain, CMV is hypothesized to cross the blood– brain barrier (BBB) by either cell- associated (2a) or cell- free form (2b). Monocytes are proposed to mediate cell- associated passage across the BBB. Upon crossing of the BBB, CMV infects resident cells (3). Apart from oligodendrocytes, CMV infection of resident CNS cells was confirmed in vivo. CMV DNA was detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of congenitally infected infants and neural stem precursor cells (NSPCs), abundant in subventricular zones (SVZ), are a prominent target of CMV infection.
Source: Created with BioRender.com. Krstanović, F., Britt, W. J., Jonjic, S. & Brizic, I. 2021. Cytomegalovirus infection and inflammation in developing brain. Viruses, 13, 1078. https:// doi.org/ 10.3390/ v13061 078, https:// crea tive comm ons.org/ licen ses/ by/ 4.0/
• Direct contact with tears (Cox et al., 1975)
• Direct contact with semen (Lupton et al., 2014)
• Vertical transmission during childbirth (Pass & Anderson, 2014).
e process of HCMV infection is complex and will not be discussed in detail in this chapter, but please see Figure 5.1 for a summary of the process.
Viral latency
A major issue with HCMV is that it leads to lifelong infection associated with la­tency; the virus can reactivate at any time, and this is especially critical for those who
Cytomegalovirus 65
are immunocompromised or undergoing organ transplantation (Schwartz & Stern­Ginossar, 2023). Moreover, the exact mechanism by which latency occurs is not completely understood (Goodrum, 2022). Please see Figure 5.2 for a comparison of acute and latent infection. is is an evolving eld of research for all latent viruses that impact humans (Crawford et al., 2022; O’Connor, 2021; Smith et al., 2021).
Figure 5.2 Immune response to cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the brain. (a) Acute infection. Upon crossing of the blood– brain barrier (BBB), CMV infects resident cells (1). Astrocyte- derived chemokines recruit microglia to the infection site (2a). Microglia are activated via pattern recognition receptors and cytokines. Activated microglia produce proinflammatory cytokines (2b), which mediate immune cell recruitment into the brain (3) and orchestrate immune cell response (4). Infiltrating NK cells and ILC1 cells produce interferon gamma (IFN- γ) and myeloid cells produce tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF- α), leading to organ- wide polarization of microglia (5); infiltrating T cells provide direct control of productive infection (6). CD8+ and CD4+ T cells recognize virus- infected cells in the context of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I and MHC II molecules and provide virus control by cytolytic mechanisms (gzmB) or by non- cytolytic mechanisms (IFN- γ). (b) Latent infection. Following resolution of acute CMV infection, T cells are retained in the brain as tissue- resident cells (TRM) and control latent/ reactivating CMV. CD8+ TRM cells are characterized by expression of CD69 and integrin CD103, while CD4+ TRM cells express CD69 and CD11a. Both cytolytic mechanisms (gzmB) and cytokines (IFN- γ) could mediate the control of latent and reactivating CMV in the CNS. TRM cells are suggested to persist in the brain of mice for a lifetime without or with minimal replenishment from the circulation. Activated microglia probably contribute to maintenance and functional capacity of TRM cells in the brain. Source: Created with BioRender.com. Krstanović, F., Britt, W. J., Jonjic, S. & Brizic, I. 2021. Cytomegalovirus infection and inflammation in developing brain. Viruses, 13, 1078. https:// doi. org/ 10.3390/ v13061 078, https:// crea tive comm ons.org/ licen ses/ by/ 4.0/
 Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
Congenital transmission
Transplacental transmission (congenital CMV (cCMV)) is an extremely important mode of disease transmission in humans (Caneld et al., 2023; Pass & Anderson,
2014). e reason for this is that mother- to- child transmission of the virus pro­vides a method of transmission that maintains a cycle of infection within the human species. Currently, there are no eective prenatal or antenatal preventive strat­egies (Caneld et al., 2023). Unfortunately, because of this, there are no universal screening approaches being oered. Suspected cases of cCMV should have a histo­pathological assessment of the placenta to identify CMV viral particles (Figure 5.3). For postnatal diagnosis, the development of a potential vaccine is ongoing, but no phase III clinical trials have been conducted.
Congenital CMV is a rare condition, but it is the most common congenital infec­tion in developed countries (Krstanović et al., 2021). In Australia, the Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit (APSU) conducts annual national surveillance on cCMV; the study has been running for 24 years and is the longest study on cCMV in the world (Teutsch et al., 2023). For example, the annual surveillance for 2022 re­ported 33 conrmed cases; this equates to an annual incidence of 11.15/ 100,000 live births (95 percent condence interval (CI): 7.93– 15.68) or approximately 300,000 births annually in Australia (Krstanović et al., 2021).
Neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric function
Pediatric population
Studies suggest that clinical disease associated with cCMV occurs in up to 15 per­cent of newborns (Jones et al., 2023). e severity of clinical disease ranges from mild to severe, and neurological abnormalities only represent one component of the possible problems related to cCMV infection, with other problems including rash, hepatosplenomegaly, and chorioretinitis.
Figure 5.3 Photomicrograph showing cytomegalovirus intranuclear inclusions (arrows) in villous stromal cells (×400 magnification).
Source: Canfield, D., Gabby, L., Vaziri Fard, E. & Gyamfi- Bannerman, C. 2023. Cytomegalovirus in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 50, 263– 277. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
Cytomegalovirus 67
Hearing loss
An important clinical problem associated with cCMV infection in newborns is sen­sorineural hearing loss (SNHL), which may be the only neurological decit due to cCMV infection (Engman et al., 2008). A 2023 prospective study compared 40 chil­dren aged 6– 7 years with cCMV to 54 healthy cCMV- negative controls matched for sex, gestational age, date of birth, and neonatal ward (Kokkola et al., 2023). All chil­dren were assessed using pure- tone audiometry, and the denition of hearing loss was a pure- tone average greater than 20 dB. Other assessments included vestibular function, which measures the function of the semicircular canal via the video head impulse test (Kokkola et al., 2023). e study reported that children with cCMV had higher rates of vestibular dysfunction compared to healthy controls (19.4 percent versus 3.2 percent, p = 0.06), although this was not statistically signicant. Moreover, rates of SNHL were higher in children with cCMV compared to controls (10.5 per­cent versus 0 percent, p = 0.12), although again this was not statistically signicant. Of note, all cases of hearing loss were unilateral. is study highlighted that vestib­ular dysfunction may be more common than SNHL at 6 years of age and that ves­tibular tests should be included in all hearing assessments of children with cCMV (Kokkola et al., 2023).
Cognitive function
A case– control study assessing long- term neuropsychological complications among very preterm children with cCMV (n = 19/ 42) compared with term- born con­trols (n = 24) found dierences in cognitive function (Brecht et al., 2015). ose in the preterm group were between ages 11.6 and 16.2 years (mean: 13.9 years) and 36 percent were female, compared to the term controls who were aged between 11.3 and 16.6 years (mean: 13.6 years) and 50 percent were female. Children were as­sessed using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale and the Developmental Test for Visual Perception. e analysis found that adolescents who were born preterm with cCMV had lower scores on the cognitive test compared to controls (92.67 versus 102.75, p = 0.03) (Figure 5.4). However, there was no statistically signicant dierence in scores for visuoperceptive abilities between those with cCMV and controls (91.22 versus 98.96, p > 0.05). In addition, a post hoc analysis identied sex dierences for IQ among those who were cCMV- positive and cCMV- negative with males having lower scores (Brecht et al., 2015). Overall, these ndings suggest that cCMV ap­pears to be a factor associated with cognitive abilities during adolescence; however, it should be noted that this study did not adjust for other potential confounding fac­tors that might account for such IQ scores and that the relatively small sample size might explain why some analyses did not reach statistical signicance.
A recent study conducted on a sample of adolescents aimed to assess the inter­play between latent HCMV infection, schizophrenia spectrum disorder, and the impact on cognitive function assessed via the intelligent quotient (IQ) (Calkova et al., 2022). All 17 adolescent patients had schizophrenia spectrum disorders (mean age: 16.7 years, 71 percent female), with approximately one- third (31 percent)