Bangirana et al. (2013a) reviewed their principal ndings from this series of pilot studies concluding that it was possible for these children to achieve their full poten­tial despite the persisting neurocognitive sequelae of CM (Bangirana et al., 2013a). However, to achieve this, they must have access to interventions like computerized cognitive rehabilitation, speech and physical therapy, and caregiver training to en­hance early childhood development when aected by severe malaria in their pre­school years (Boivin & Giordani, 2009). ey believed such a study was feasible for community- wide scale- up because almost the whole of Uganda potentially had ac­cess to the internet through mobile- phone coverage network cards that could plug into low- cost, durable, solar- charged laptop computers. is warranted a clinical study of CCRT with school- age survivors of CM that could establish the feasibility of using such a system to provide neurocognitive assessment and treatment in areas where such services are unavailable, demonstrating that such services can be de­livered to multiple children simultaneously while being mediated by local health­care workers and teachers (Bangirana et al., 2009b). Furthermore, establishing the feasibility and benet of CCRT in the sub- Saharan African Ugandan study setting