Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5221_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf

Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
DEMERS, H. L., HE, S., PANDIT, S. G., HANNAH, E. E., ZHANG, Z., YAN, F., GREEN, H. R.,
REYES, D. F., HAU, D., MCLARTY, M. E., ALTAMURA, L., TAYLOR- HOWELL, C., GATES-
HOLLINGSWORTH, M. A., QIU, X. & AUCOIN, D. P. 2020. Development of an antigen detection
assay for early point- of- care diagnosis of Zaire ebolavirus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 14, e0008817.
FELDMANN, H. & GEISBERT, T. W. 2011. Ebola haemorrhagic fever. Lancet, 377, 849– 862.
FICENEC, S. C., SCHIEFFELIN, J. S. & EMMETT, S. D. 2019. A review of hearing loss associated with
Zika, Ebola, and Lassa fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 101, 484– 490.
HOENEN, T., GROSETH, A. & FELDMANN, H. 2019. erapeutic strategies to target the Ebola virus
life cycle. Nat Rev Microbiol, 17, 593– 606.
HOWLETT, P., BROWN, C., HELDERMAN, T., BROOKS, T., LISK, D., DEEN, G., SOLBRIG, M. &
LADO, M. 2016. Ebola virus disease complicated by late- onset encephalitis and polyarthritis, Sierra
Leone. Emerg Infect Dis, 22, 150– 152.
JACOBS, M., RODGER, A., BELL, D. J., BHAGANI, S., CROPLEY, I., FILIPE, A., GIFFORD, R. J.,
HOPKINS, S., HUGHES, J., JABEEN, F., JOHANNESSEN, I., KARAGEORGOPOULOS, D.,
LACKENBY, A., LESTER, R., LIU, R. S., MACCONNACHIE, A., MAHUNGU, T., MARTIN, D.,
MARSHALL, N., MEPHAM, S., ORTON, R., PALMARINI, M., PATEL, M., PERRY, C., PETERS, S.
E., PORTER, D., RITCHIE, D., RITCHIE, N. D., SEATON, R. A., SREENU, V. B., TEMPLETON, K.,
WARREN, S., WILKIE, G. S., ZAMBON, M., GOPAL, R. & THOMSON, E. C. 2016. Late Ebola virus
relapse causing meningoencephalitis: A case report. Lancet, 388, 498– 503.
JAIN, S., KHAIBOULLINA, S. F. & BARANWAL, M. 2020. Immunological perspective for Ebola virus
infection and various treatment measures taken to ght the disease. Pathogens, 9, 850.
KAKOOZA- MWESIGE, A., MOHAMMED, A. H., KRISTENSSON, K., JULIANO, S. L. &
LUTWAMA, J. J. 2018. Emerging viral infections in sub- Saharan Africa and the developing nervous
system: A mini review. Front Neurol, 9, 82.
KALONGI, Y., MWANZA, K., TSHISUAKA, M., LUSIAMA, N., NTANDO, E., KANZAKE, L.,
SHIEH, W. J., ZAKI, S. R., LLOYD, E. S., KSIAZEK, T. G. & ROLLIN, P. E. 1999. Isolated case of
Ebola hemorrhagic fever with mucormycosis complications, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the
Congo. J Infect Dis, 179 Suppl 1, S15– S17.
KEITA, M. M., TAVERNE, B., SY SAVANÉ, S., MARCH, L., DOUKOURE, M., SOW, M. S., TOURÉ,
A., ETARD, J. F., BARRY, M. & DELAPORTE, E. 2017. Depressive symptoms among survivors
of Ebola virus disease in Conakry (Guinea): Preliminary results of the PostEboGui cohort. BMC
Psychiatry, 17, 127.
KELLER, G. B., BONHOEFFER, T. & HUBENER, M. 2012. Sensorimotor mismatch signals in primary
visual cortex of the behaving mouse. Neuron, 74, 809– 815.
KELLY, J. D., WORDEN, L., WANNIER, S. R., HOFF, N. A., MUKADI, P., SINAI, C., ACKLEY, S.,
CHEN, X., GAO, D., SELO, B., MOSSOKO, M., OKITOLONDA- WEMAKOY, E., RICHARDSON,
E. T., RUTHERFORD, G. W., LIETMAN, T. M., MUYEMBE- TAMFUM, J. J., RIMOIN, A. W. &
PORCO, T. C. 2019. Projections of Ebola outbreak size and duration with and without vaccine use in
Équateur, Democratic Republic of Congo, as of May 27, 2018. PLoS One, 14, e0213190.
KERPER, M. & PUCKETT, Y. 2023. Filovirus [Online]. StatPearls Publishing. Available: https:// www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ books/ NBK544 258/
LEE, H. N., MCWILLIAMS, I. L., LEWKOWICZ, A. P., ENGEL, K., IRELAND, D. D. C., KELLEY-
BAKER, L., THACKER, S., PICCARDO, P., MANANGEESWARAN, M. & VERTHELYI, D. 2021.
Characterization of the therapeutic eect of antibodies targeting the Ebola glycoprotein using a novel
BSL2- compliant rVSVDeltaG- EBOV- GP infection model. Emerg Microbes Infect, 10, 2076– 2089.
LEFEBVRE, A., FIET, C., BELPOIS- DUCHAMP, C., TIV, M., ASTRUC, K. & AHO GLELE, L. S. 2014.
Case fatality rates of Ebola virus diseases: A meta- analysis of World Health Organization data. Med
Mal Infect, 44, 412– 416.
LEROY, E., BAIZE, S. & GONZALEZ, J. P. 2011. [Ebola and Marburg hemorrhagic fever viruses: Update
on loviruses]. Med Trop (Mars), 71, 111– 121.
LIU, W. J., SESAY, F. R., COURSIER, A., KNUST, B., MARRINAN, J. E., WHITMER, S., MCDONALD,
S. L. R., GAILLARD, P., LIU, Y., SU, Q., ZHANG, Y., CROZIER, I., ARIYARAJAH, A., CARINO,
M., MASSAQUOI, T., BROUTET, N., XU, W., WU, G., STRÖHER, U., GAO, G. F., FORMENTY, P.,
SAHR, F., DEEN, G. F. & SIERRA LEONE EBOLA VIRUS PERSISTENCE STUDY GROUP. 2019.

NeuroEbola 49
Comprehensive clinical and laboratory follow- up of a female patient with Ebola virus disease: Sierra
Leone Ebola Virus Persistence Study. Open Forum Infect Dis, 6, ofz068.
LIU, Z., LIU, Q., WANG, H. & YAO, X. 2024. Severe zoonotic viruses carried by dierent species of bats
and their regional distribution. Clin Microbiol Infect, 30, 206– 210.
MEDLEY, A. M., MAVILA, O., MAKUMBI, I., NIZEYEMANA, F., UMUTONI, A., BALISANGA,
H., MANOAH, Y. K., GEISSLER, A., BUNGA, S., MACDONALD, G., HOMSY, J., OJWANG, J.,
EWETOLA, R., RAGHUNATHAN, P. L., MACGURN, A., SINGLER, K., WARD, S., ROOHI, S.,
BROWN, V., SHOEMAKER, T., LAKO, R., KABEJA, A., MURUTA, A., LUBULA, L. & MERRILL,
R. 2020. Case denitions used during the rst 6 months of the 10th Ebola virus disease outbreak in
the Democratic Republic of the Congo— Four neighboring countries, August 2018– February 2019.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 69, 14– 19.
MÜHLBERGER, E. 2007. Filovirus replication and transcription. Future Virol, 2, 205– 215.
NICASTRI, E., BALESTRA, P., RICOTTINI, M., PETROSILLO, N., DI CARO, A., CAPOBIANCHI, M.
R., GIANCOLA, M. L., IPPOLITO, G. & INMI’S EBOLA TEAM. 2016. Temporary neurocognitive
impairment with Ebola virus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 87, 1386– 1387.
SAGUI, E., JANVIER, F., BAIZE, S., FOISSAUD, V., KOULIBALY, F., SAVINI, H., MAUGEY, N.,
ALETTI, M., GRANIER, H. & CARMOI, T. 2015. Severe Ebola virus infection with encephalop-
athy: Evidence for direct virus involvement. Clin Infect Dis, 61, 1627– 1628.
SHANTHA, J. G., CROZIER, I., HAYEK, B. R., BRUCE, B. B., GARGU, C., BROWN, J., FANKHAUSER,
J. & YEH, S. 2017. Ophthalmic manifestations and causes of vision impairment in Ebola virus di-
sease survivors in Monrovia, Liberia. Ophthalmology, 124, 170– 177.
STEPTOE, P. J., SCOTT, J. T., BAXTER, J. M., PARKES, C. K., DWIVEDI, R., CZANNER, G., VANDY,
M. J., MOMORIE, F., FORNAH, A. D., KOMBA, P., RICHARDS, J., SAHR, F., BEARE, N. A. V. &
SEMPLE, M. G. 2017a. Novel retinal lesion in Ebola survivors, Sierra Leone, 2016. Emerg Infect Dis,
23, 1102– 1109.
STEPTOE, P. J., SCOTT, J. T., HARDING, S. P., BEARE, N. A. V., SEMPLE, M. G., VANDY, M. J.
& SAHR, F. 2017b. Ocular complications in survivors of the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. Am J
Ophthalmol, 181, 180.
TAKADA, A., WATANABE, S., OKAZAKI, K., KIDA, H. & KAWAOKA, Y. 2001. Infectivity- enhancing
antibodies to Ebola Virus glycoprotein. J Virol, 75, 2324– 2330.
TSHALA- KATUMBAY, D. D., KOMBI, M. J. & BOIVIN, M. J. 2023. Unpublished data.
WONG, G., KOBINGER, G. P. & QIU, X. 2014. Characterization of host immune responses in Ebola
virus infections. Expert Rev Clin Immunol, 10, 781– 790.
ZENG, X., BLANCETT, C. D., KOISTINEN, K. A., SCHELLHASE, C. W., BEARSS, J. J.,
RADOSHITZKY, S. R., HONNOLD, S. P., CHANCE, T. B., WARREN, T. K., FROUDE, J. W.,
CASHMAN, K. A., DYE, J. M., BAVARI, S., PALACIOS, G., KUHN, J. H. & SUN, M. G. 2017.
Identication and pathological characterization of persistent asymptomatic Ebola virus infection in
rhesus monkeys. Nat Microbiol, 2, 17113.

4
Neurocognitive, Neuropsychiatric, and
Neurological Aspects of Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
(SARS- CoV- 2, Covid- 19)
Stuti Chakraborty
Introduction
Coronaviruses are a diverse group of highly pathogenic, single- stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) viruses. ey are known to infect animals but also cause mild to
severe respiratory illness in humans. Human coronaviruses are named aer the
crown- like spike appearances on their surface and have four main subgroups: alpha,
beta, gamma, and delta (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023b). e
novel coronavirus (betacoronavirus) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV- 2, Covid- 19) has a genomic sequence that is 79 percent identical with the SARS coronavirus (SARS- CoV) and with the Middle East respiratory
syndrome coronavirus (MERS- CoV). It also shares genome organization with other
betacoronaviruses (Lu et al., 2020). Phylogenetic whole genome analysis revealed
that the Covid- 19 and SARS- related coronaviruses identied in bats are clustered,
placing Covid-19 in the Sarbecovirus subgenus of the genus Betacoronavirus. e
majority of the proteins encoded by Covid- 19 are similar in length to the proteins
encoded by SARS- CoV. In addition, Covid- 19 has more than 90 percent amino
acid identity with the SARS- CoV (Chan et al., 2020). Toward the end of December
2019, health facilities in Wuhan, Hubei province, China started observing and reporting patient clusters with pneumonia and respiratory virus- related symptoms
of unknown cause, which subsequently led to the discovery of a previously unknown betacoronavirus (Zhu et al., 2021). e symptoms replicated those seen in
viral pneumonia and included cough, fever, and chest congestion and discomfort.
Similar outbreaks had been observed in 2002 and 2012 caused by SARS- CoV and
MERS CoV, respectively, both of which were highly transmissible and of zoonotic
origin (Cui et al., 2019). However, Covid- 19 was reported to be even more transmittable and capable of rapid spread. By early 2020, Covid- 19 had spread worldwide,
Stuti Chakraborty,
(SARS- CoV- 2, Covid- 19) In:

Covid-19 51
infecting a greater number of people than the MERS- CoV or SARS- CoV (J. T. Wu
et al., 2020). In March 2020, the Director- General of the World Health Organization
formally declared Covid- 19 a global pandemic (World Health Organization, 2020).
As of August 2, 2023, 768,983,095 conrmed cases of Covid- 19 infection had
been reported, with over 6.9 million deaths worldwide (World Health Organization,
2023). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, mortality rates
have been highest in the age group over 85 years across both sexes (3,380,944), followed by ages 75– 84 years (2,918,149) and 65– 74 years (2,416,198) (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2023a).
Early neurological manifestations of central
nervous system damage caused by Covid- 19
Although Covid- 19 is primarily classied as a type of severe respiratory illness, more
than two- thirds of patients hospitalized with the disease have suered from damage
to the central nervous system (CNS) in addition to respiratory symptoms (Lahiri &
Ardila, 2020). CNS damage associated with Covid- 19 is oen ischemic, with cases of
hemorrhagic and encephalitic damage also recorded (Bodro et al., 2021). A possible
pathological route of entry from early data suggested inammatory impacts on CNS
vasculature via nasal mucosa and olfactory bers and spread through hematogenous
routes, infecting pericytes, neurons, and endothelial cells (Bauer et al., 2022; Hu
et al., 2021). Multiple reports of Covid- 19 impacting the brain and causing neurological disruption were recorded during the early emergence of the disease. Evidence
of microstructural damage in the brain, seen on neuroradiological investigation
with diusion tensor imaging and T1- weighted magnetic resonance sequences, indicated higher gray matter volumes and reduced diusivity in white matter, which
specically correlated with brain regions involved in memory and olfaction. is
demonstrated potential long- term neurological consequences in patients aer recovering from the disease (Lu et al., 2020). e most frequently reported forms of
CNS damage associated with Covid- 19 include acute cerebrovascular disease presenting as ischemic strokes, intracerebral or intracranial haemorrhage, encephalitis
(causing damage to the brainstem), Guillain– Barré syndrome, CNS vasculitis (meningitis, myelitis), and other forms of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis associated with SARS- CoV- 2 infection and other acute neuropathies (Ellul et al., 2020).
In addition, increased gliosis possibly from inammation or other types of damage
has been reported in the dorsal putamen and ventral striatum aer mild or moderate
Covid- 19 infection (Braga et al., 2023). Other peripheral nervous system manifestations reported include anosmia, ageusia, and skeletal system involvement causing
myalgia or myasthenia gravis (Ousseiran et al., 2023). A recent prospective multisite
observational study assessing 158,267 adults found that among neurological complications aer Covid- 19, the prevalence of stroke increased with increasing age; however, a rapid decline over the duration of the pandemic (between 2020 and 2023) was

Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
observed in the number of stroke diagnoses (Cho et al., 2023). Risk of CNS infections and seizures were commonly noted in children and observed to be decreasing
with increase in age (Cho et al., 2023).
Pathophysiology
In addition to neurological manifestations, evidence of psychiatric and cognitive involvement has also been recorded in Covid- 19. Some of these have included nonspecic encephalopathy (confusion, disorientation, headaches without known
cause) (Mao et al., 2020), altered mental state (psychosis and other neurocognitive
changes), and the so- called dysexecutive syndrome characterized by disorientation,
lack of attention or inattention, and poorly organized movements in response to
commands (Helms et al., 2020).
e pathophysiology of Covid- 19 has been attributed to two major factors: damage
to the CNS by direct neurotoxicity or due to activation of the host immune response (Desforges et al., 2019). Covid- 19 damages the nervous system by entering
the human body via blood circulation, neuronal pathways, or by binding to the
angiotensin- converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, leading to hypoxic insult. e
role of ACE2 is to regulate normal function of the brain by stimulating brain- derived
neurotrophic factor (BDNF). BDNF is essential in the reduction of microglial activation and neuronal inammation, and low levels of BDNF have been associated
with cognitive dysfunction (S. Y. Wu et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2014). Entry through
the sensory and motor neuronal pathways is common because coronaviruses are
neurotropic in nature, which allows them to escape host immune responses and thus
achieve latency.
e role of ACE2 and the neuronal pathway via the olfactory nerve have been
identied as the two primary pathophysiological mechanisms causing cognitive and
neuropsychiatric complications in Covid- 19. e olfactory nerves and bulb, present in the nasal cavity and forebrain, are attacked by coronaviruses entering the
respiratory tract, reaching the ACE2 enzymes in respiratory epithelial cells. Once
inside the forebrain, the virus can cross the blood– brain barrier and cerebrospinal
uid, causing inammation. Such inammation can result in demyelination and
spread throughout the blood– brain barrier and cerebrospinal uid in under 7 days
(Bohmwald et al., 2018; Mirfazeli et al., 2020; Pantelis et al., 2021). Coronaviruses
interact with ACE2 receptors in two major ways: (1) by directly binding to ACE2 receptors in the epithelial cells of the respiratory system causing a cytokine storm and
widespread inammation and (2) disrupting the role of ACE2 in regulating blood
pressure. e course of Covid- 19 infection has shown elevation in key cytokines
like interleukin 1 beta, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha, among others
(Poduri et al., 2020; Ye et al., 2020). is can lead to conditions of multiple organ
failure and immune- mediated encephalopathy showing symptoms of seizure, delirium, and other neuropsychiatric disorders because of neuroinammation (Otani

Covid-19 53
et al., 2019). Neuroinammation leading to hypercoagulable states coupled with an
increase in blood pressure can cause the ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes commonly seen in Covid- 19 infection (Fotuhi et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2021; Miners
et al., 2020). Covid- 19- infected patients also oen experience hypoxic states (hypoxic encephalopathy) resulting from respiratory distress (acute respiratory distress syndrome), caused by lung injury (Grasselli et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2020).
Respiratory failure leads to hypoxic states in the brain— prolonged and continuing periods of hypoxia can cause irreversible damage to neurons, death of oligodendrocytes (myelinating cells fostering neuronal communication), and disruption
of the blood– brain barrier (Fernando et al., 2006; Moskowitz et al., 2010; Yang &
Rosenberg, 2011). Postmortem and autopsy studies have shown evidence of neuronal damage in brain regions associated with cognitive functions such as in the hippocampus and neocortex (Chen et al., 2022; Kantonen et al., 2020; Reichard et al.,
2020; Solomon et al., 2020).
Several studies have suggested that the Covid- 19 virus infects human neurons,
microglia (resident macrophage neuroimmune cells that perform pivotal brain
function in homeostasis), and astrocytes (essential constituents of the neurovascular
unit, providing a link between neurons and blood vessels). Responding to attack by
infectious agents, microglia increase in number and migrate to the primary infection site, acquiring an activated phagocytic phenotype (De Sousa et al., 2021; Frost
et al., 2019). Microglia have been found to contribute to memory impairments in
mouse models of viral infections in the CNS by attacking and actively eliminating
synaptic connections (Vasek et al., 2016). In homeostasis, astrocytes provide support and maintenance to the blood– brain barrier and neuronal connections. Under
infectious conditions, astrocytes undergo changes in morphology, function, and
molecular composition, which can lead to damaging eects. In a mouse model,
researchers found that activation of microglia in the hippocampus inhibited neurogenesis, leading to impaired formation of memory (Venkataramani & Winkler,
2022). Further, infections of the CNS can cause cognitive, mood- related, psychiatric,
and motor changes that persist beyond the acute phase of the infection (van den
Pol, 2009).
Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations
of Covid- 19
Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric consequences of Covid- 19 occur not only due to
pathological factors such as inammation and lack of oxygenation due to cerebrovascular disruption but also due to social and environmental factors such as isolation, lack of support, and public health concerns leading to multifactor- induced
delirium (Achar & Ghosh, 2020; Nakamura et al., 2021; Oussalah et al., 2020). An
early systematic review and meta- analysis of 1963 studies conducted to determine
the neuropsychiatric and psychiatric presentations of SARS, MERS, and Covid- 19

Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
found delirium (confusion in 65 percent and agitation in 69 percent of patients in
intensive care) in addition to altered consciousness and dysexecutive syndrome at
discharge (Rogers et al., 2020). Another systematic review of psychiatric sequalae
in Covid- 19 patients included 1725 unique studies, of which 66 met the inclusion
criteria and included follow- up time up to 7 months aer discharge. e majority of
the included studies reported depression or anxiety, or both, with risk factors such as
severity of Covid- 19 infection, female sex, and symptom duration, with pathophysiological correlation to inammatory markers. Studies have also included accounts
of post- traumatic stress disorder, cognitive decits, and sleep disturbances, with
symptoms improving over time (Schou et al., 2021). Persistent neuropsychiatric and
psychiatric sequalae aer Covid- 19 infection have also been reported. e National
Institute for Health and Care Excellence United Kingdom guidelines recognized and
conceptualized Covid- 19 symptoms persisting between 4 and 12 weeks post infection as the so- called post- Covid- 19 syndrome (Greenhalgh et al., 2020). e rst
neuropsychiatric follow- up study with survivors of Covid- 19 infection 6 months
aer symptom onset found associations with symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and persistent low mood (Nersesjan et al., 2022).
Subsequent reports have found a high prevalence of neuropsychiatric involvement
aer Covid- 19 infection with increases in not previously diagnosed mood or anxiety
disorders, dementia, fatigue, and sleep disorders (Davis et al., 2021; Taquet et al.,
2021). Another systematic review and meta- analysis of persistent neuropsychiatric
symptoms of Covid- 19 found a high prevalence of sleep disorders and fatigue, experienced by almost one in four patients and with relatively stable occurrence across
various time points within the rst 6 months (Badenoch et al., 2022). Symptom reports of obsessive– compulsive disorder were also recorded in studies that screened
patients at follow- up, with improvements observed between 1 and 3 months (Mazza
et al., 2020, 2021).
Cognitive presentations of Covid- 19
Various aspects of Covid- 19 infection can likely impact cognition. White matter
in the cerebrum is critical in cognitive control and function. Cerebral white matter
is vulnerable to damage from ischemic strokes commonly recorded in Covid- 19.
Evidence also points toward the acceleration of amyloid- β accumulation, linked
to tau and TAR DNA- binding protein 43 (TDP- 43) pathology. TDP- 43 is an RNA/
DNA binding protein that plays a role in regulating RNA processing. Accumulation
of TDP- 43 aggregates is commonly seen in the CNS in several neurodegenerative
conditions such as frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (Jo et al., 2020;
Miners et al., 2020). Cortical atrophy involving the limbic system of the brain before and aer Covid- 19 infection in UK Biobank participants was visualized using
magnetic resonance imaging (Douaud et al., 2022). Signicant long- term consequences were observed, which included reduction in gray matter thickness of the

Covid-19 55
parahippocampal gyrus (an important region responsible for memory encoding and
retrieval) and a greater reduction of global brain size in Covid- 19- infected patients
(Douaud et al., 2022).
A systematic review and meta- analysis examined cognitive functioning during
the early emergence and acute phase of Covid- 19 infection (Crivelli et al., 2022).
Findings showed cognitive decits increasing until the 10th day post infection, with
eventual symptom alleviation. Other reported cognitive dysfunction symptoms
included impairment in visual perception, verbal uency, and naming during the
acute phase (Amalakanti et al., 2021; Tolentino et al., 2021). e systematic review
also found reports of cohort studies with a high occurrence of moderate cognitive
impairment in post- Covid- 19 infection, with additional studies reporting decits
in cognitive domains such as executive functioning, memory, and verbal uency
(Ermis et al., 2021; Hosp et al., 2021; Miskowiak et al., 2021). Meta- analysis showed
overall poorer general cognitive functioning outcomes measured on the Montreal
Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in people with Covid- 19 infection, compared to
those without, in the duration between acute assessment and 6 months post infection (Crivelli et al., 2022). e most impacted cognitive domains were found to
be memory, attention, and executive function up to 3 months aer infection with
Covid- 19 (Crivelli et al., 2022; Ortelli et al., 2021; Rogers et al., 2020; Woo et al.,
2020). Reporting on variant- specic cognitive outcomes of Covid- 19 is limited.
One study assessed cognitive function among patients infected with the omicron
variant, a variant of concern that has a large number of spike mutations and high
rates of transmission, using the Mini- Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and the
MoCA. e MoCA assessed a cohort of 215 patients on executive function, abstraction skills, targeting attention, computation, memory, and language. e MMSE assessed patients on basic cognition involving orientation to and awareness of time
and place. Patients having Covid- 19 infection of the omicron variant obtained comparable scores on both assessments; however, female patients aged 50 years and over
reported signicantly lower scores, compared to men over the age of 50, indicating
more pronounced cognitive dysfunction. Impairments were noted in calculation,
uency, abstraction, and sustained attention among patients over 50 years (Yuan
et al., 2023).
Long- term cognitive presentations of Covid- 19
Longitudinal cognitive follow- up of Covid- 19 patients also has found continuing
memory problems, which were reported by 44 percent of patients aer 6 months and
remained in more than 10 percent aer 8 months following mild Covid- 19 infection
(Nersesjan et al., 2022). Another early report from a United Kingdom- wide surveillance study including 153 patients recorded cases of altered mental status (31 percent) and a neurocognitive (dementia- like) syndrome (26 percent) among cognitive
presentations (Varatharaj et al., 2020). Long- term sequelae of Covid- 19 included

Infectious Disease and Neurocognition
reports of reduced perfusion in the frontotemporal (Helms et al., 2020), temporal,
sub- insular, and bilateral thalamic regions (Kumar et al., 2021; Montalvan et al.,
2020; Poyiadji et al., 2020). Fatigue was also reported as a cognitive presentation in
the acute and persistent phases of Covid- 19 infection. Rudro et al. (2020) dene
Covid- 19- induced fatigue as “a decrease in physical and/ or mental performance that
results from changes in central, psychological, and or/ peripheral factors due to the
Covid- 19 disease” (p. 2).
Fatigue has been observed to be a more persistent, long- term consequence in the
case of MERS and SARS infections, as compared to Covid- 19, with reports of this
symptom lasting up to 39 months post initial infection (Rogers et al., 2020). In the
case of Covid- 19, several studies have reported improvement in fatigue from the
acute to follow- up phase (Chevinsky et al., 2021; Iqbal et al., 2021), with a median duration of symptom presentation of 14 days in mild infection and 32 days in severe infection (Schou et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2021). Comprehensive evaluation of post- acute
neurological sequelae at 1 year from a cohort of 154,068 individuals infected with
Covid- 19 found increased risk associated with memory problems and Alzheimer’s
disease (Xu et al., 2022). e association between Covid- 19 and Alzheimer’s disease
can be attributed to the entry of the virus into host cells through the ACE2 receptor
as ACE2 overexpression is common in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s disease,
thereby increasing the chances of viral invasion. Other etiologies such as reduction
in BDNF due to ACE2 inhibition, presence of the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele in
Alzheimer’s disease (Verghese et al., 2011), oxidative stress, and neuroinammation
also contribute to increased risk of Covid- 19 infection in Alzheimer’s disease
(Rudnicka- Drożak et al., 2023).
When examining cross- sectional cognitive performance data among 81,337 patients who had recovered from or no longer exhibited symptoms of Covid- 19 infection, signicant cognitive decits were observed (Hampshire et al., 2021). Among
the entire population tested using a web- based clinically validated cognitive assessment, the most pronounced decits were seen in cognitive function- related
domains. ese included decits in problem- solving, reasoning, target detection,
and spatial planning. Performance on tests assessing simpler functions such as
working memory was spared (Hampshire et al., 2021). A nationwide cohort study
determining the clinical sequelae of persistent Covid- 19 aer a year among patients with mild infection found the highest prevalence of adverse health outcomes
among those aged 41– 60 years. In this age group, impairments in concentration and
memory were more predominant during the late phase (between 180 and 360 days
since infection) (Mizrahi et al., 2023).
So- called brain fog is another reported long- term cognitive consequence of persistent Covid- 19 infection. e World Health Organization has described brain fog
as an informal umbrella term used by patients to refer to complaints of multiple
and diverse impairments in intellectual functioning during the post- acute phase of
Covid- 19 (Krishnan et al., 2022). However, since the evidence for brain fog is mostly
in the form of broad, colloquial, patient self- reports describing problems with

Covid-19 57
concentration, disorientation, low energy, and other psychological issues, it must be
interpreted with caution (Hampshire et al., 2021).
e most common etiology of long- term cognitive impairment following viral infection has been attributed to microglial activation in the hippocampal region. is,
in turn, is associated with hippocampal atrophy resulting from systemic inammation, which may be due to acute respiratory distress syndrome, which is also present in Covid- 19 infection (Girard et al., 2018; Lindlau et al., 2015; Sasannejad et al.,
2019; Vasek et al., 2016).
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is important to note that a very large number of publications have
characterized and reported on the neurological, neuropsychiatric, and cognitive implications of infection from Covid- 19 during the early and emerging days of understanding disease mechanisms for rapid containment. Specically, data on the
cognitive decits caused by the disease were oen insucient and sometimes reported obscurely (Mao et al., 2020). However, as more studies were published, systematic evidence synthesis since the declaration of the Covid- 19 pandemic in 2020
has provided substantiation of the multifold acute as well as persistent neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and neurological manifestations of Covid- 19. Because of the novelty
of Covid- 19, new studies will most likely continue to characterize the nature, severity, longitudinal trajectory, and pathophysiology of the cognitive and neuropsychiatric associations associated with Covid- 19.
References
ACHAR, A. & GHOSH, C. 2020. COVID- 19- associated neurological disorders: e potential route of
CNS invasion and blood- brain barrier relevance. Cells, 9, 2360.
AMALAKANTI, S., AREPALLI, K. V. R. & JILLELLA, J. P. 2021. Cognitive assessment in asympto-
matic COVID- 19 subjects. Virusdisease, 32, 146– 149.
BADENOCH, J. B., RENGASAMY, E. R., WATSON, C., JANSEN, K., CHAKRABORTY, S.,
SUNDARAM, R. D., HAFEEZ, D., BURCHILL, E., SAINI, A., THOMAS, L., CROSS, B., HUNT,
C. K., CONTI, I., RALOVSKA, S., HUSSAIN, Z., BUTLER, M., POLLAK, T. A., KOYCHEV, I.,
MICHAEL, B. D., HOLLING, H., NICHOLSON, T. R., ROGERS, J. P. & ROONEY, A. G. 2022.
Persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms aer COVID- 19: A systematic review and meta- analysis.
Brain Commun, 4, fcab297.
BAUER, L., LAKSONO, B. M., DE VRIJ, F. M. S., KUSHNER, S. A., HARSCHNITZ, O. & VAN RIEL, D.
2022. e neuroinvasiveness, neurotropism, and neurovirulence of SARS- CoV- 2. Trends Neurosci,
45, 358– 368.
BODRO, M., COMPTA, Y. & SÁNCHEZ- VALLE, R. 2021. Presentations and mechanisms of CNS dis-
orders related to COVID- 19. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinamm, 8, e923.
BOHMWALD, K., GÁLVEZ, N. M. S., RÍOS, M. & KALERGIS, A. M. 2018. Neurologic alterations due
to respiratory virus infections. Front Cell Neurosci, 12, 386.
BRAGA, J., LEPRA, M., KISH, S. J., RUSJAN, P. M., NASSER, Z., VERHOEFF, N., VASDEV, N.,
BAGBY, M., BOILEAU, I., HUSAIN, M. I., KOLLA, N., GARCIA, A., CHAO, T., MIZRAHI, R.,
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
