Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3715_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
86
https://t.me/medicina_free
36. Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Mahoney OW, Seward JB, Tajik JA.Constrictive
pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation. 1999;100:1380–6.
37. Ling LH, Oh JK, Breen JF, Schaff JV, Danielson GK, Mahoney DW, Seward JB, Tajik
AJ.Calcic constrictive pericarditis: is it still with us? Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:444–50.
38. Levine HD.Myocardial brosis in constrictive pericarditis electrocardiographic and pathologic observations. Circulation. 1973;48:1268–81.
39. Levine HD, Ford RV.Subendocardial infarction: report of six cases and critical survey of the
literature. Circulation. 1950;1:246.
40. Leya FS, Arab D, Joyal D, Shioura KM, Lewis BE, Steen LH, Cho L.The efcacy of brain
natriuretic peptide levels in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1900–2.
41. Maisch B, Seferović PM, Ristić AD, Erbel R, Rienmüller R, Adler Y, Tomkowski WZ, Thiene
G, Yacoub MH, Priori SG, Alonso Garcia MA.Guidelines on the diagnosis and management
of pericardial diseases executive summary: the task force on the diagnosis and management of
pericardial diseases of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(7):587–610.
42. Mehta A, Mehta M, Jain AC.Constrictive pericarditis. Clin Cardiol. 1999;22:334–44.
43. Merlini G.AL amyloidosis: from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapies. Hematol Am
Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017;2017(1):1–12.
44. Mocumbi AO, Ferreira MB, Sidi D, etal. A population study of endomyocardial brosis in a
rural area of Mozambique. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):43–9.
45. Muchtar E, Blauwet LA, Gertz MA.Restrictive cardiomyopathy: genetics, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and therapy. Circ Res. 2017;121(7):819–37.
46. Olsen CO, Tyson GS, Maier GW, Davis JW, Rankin JS.Diminished stroke volume during
inspiration: a reverse thoracic pump. Circulation. 1985;72(3):668–79.
47. Olsen EGJ, CJF S. The pathogenesis of Loefer’s endomyocardial disease and its relationship to endomyocardial brosis. In: Yu P, Goodwin JF, editors. Progress in cardiology, vol. 8.
Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1979. p.281–303.
48. Olsen EGJ.Morphological overview and pathogenetic mechanism in endomyocardial brosis
associated with eosinophilia. In: Olsen EGJ, Sekiguchi M, editors. Cardiomyopathy update 3.
Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press; 1990. p.1–8.
49. Ruberg FL, Berk JL. Transthyretin (TTR) cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation.
2012;126(10):1286–300.
50. Schiavone WA.The changing aetiology of constrictive pericarditis in a large referral center.
Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:373–5.
51. Schiavone WA, Calaore PA, Salcedo EE.Transesophageal Doppler echocardiographic demonstration of pulmonary venous ow velocity in restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive
pericarditis. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:1286–18.
52. Samuel I, Anklesaria X.Endomyocardial brosis in South India. Ind J Path Bact. 1960;3:157.
53. Smoedema JP, Katjitae I, Reuter H, Burgess L, Louw V, Pretorius M, etal. Twelve-lead electrocardiography in tuberculous pericarditis. Cardiovasc J South Afr. 2001;12:31–4.
54. Surawicz B, Lasseter KC.Electrocardiogram in pericarditis. Am J Cardiol. 1970;26:471–4.
55. Schoenfeld MH, Edwards WS, William GD Jr, etal. Restrictive cardiomyopathy versus constrictive pericarditis-role of endomyocardial biopsy in avoiding unnecessary thoracotomy.
Circulation. 1987;75:1012–7.
56. Schoenfeld MH.The differentiation of restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis. Cardiol Clin. 1990;8:663–71.
57. Shaper AG. Cardiovascular disease in the tropics. II. Endomyocardial brosis.
BMJ. 1972;3:743–6.
58. Shaper AG.The aaetiology of endomyocardial brosis. In: Valiathan MS.Somers K, Kartha
CC (eds). Endomyocardial brosis. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1993: 111–120.
59. Sipe JD, Cohen AS.Review: history of the amyloid bril. J Struct Biol. 2000;130(2–3):88–98.
7 Clinical Presentation, Lab Investigations, andEndomyocardial Biopsy

References
https://t.me/medicina_free
60. Sousa M, Monohan G, Rajagopalan N, et al. Heart transplantation in cardiac amyloidosis.
Heart Fail Rev. 2017;22(3):317–27.
61. Spodick D.Low atrial natriuretic factor levels and absent pulmonary oedema in pericardial
compression of the heart. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:1271–2.
62. Spodick DH. Chronic and constrictive pericarditis. NewYork: Grune and Stratton; 1964.
p.134–8.
63. Spodick DH.Constrictive pericarditis. In: Spodick DH, editor. The pericardium: a comprehensive textbook. 1st ed. NewYork: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1997. p.214–59.
64. Spodick DH.Diagnostic electrocardiographic sequences in acute pericarditis: signicance of
PR segment and PR vector changes. Circulation. 1973;48:575–80.
65. Spodick DH. Infective pericarditis. Etiologic and clinical spectra. In: Reddy PS, Leon DF,
Shaver JA, editors. Pericardial disease. NewYork: Raven Press; 1982. p.307–32.
66. Spodick DH.Pericardial rub: prospective, multiple observer investigation of pericardial friction in 100 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1975;35:357–62.
67. Spodick DH.The normal and diseased pericardium: current concepts of pericardial physiology, diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:240–51.
68. Spodick DH. The pericardium. A comprehensive textbook, vol. 233. New York, NY:
M.Dekker; 1997. p.464.
69. Spodick DH. Pericardial diseases. In: Braunwald E, Zipes DP, Libby P, editors. Heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, vol. 6. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 2001.
p.1823–70.
70. Spodick DH.Pericardial macro-and microanatomy: a synopsis. In: Spodick DH, editor. The
pericardium: a comprehensive textbook. NewYork: Marcel Dekker; 1997. p.7–14.
71. Troughton RW, Asher CR, Klein AL.Pericarditis Lancet. 2004;363:717–27.
72. Tharakan JA.Electrocardiography in endomyocardial brosis. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol
J. 2011;11:129–33.
73. Tharakan J, Bohora S. Current p erspe ctive on endomyocardial brosis. Curr Sci.
2009;97:405–10.
74. Tharakan JM, Venkatachalam CG, Balakrishnan KG.Angiographic features of endomyocardial brosis. In: Valiathan MS, editor. Endomyocardial Fibrosis. New Delhi: Oxford University
Press; 1993. p.168–84.
75. Uemura H, Ho SY, Devine WA, Kilpatrick LL, Anderson RH.Atrial appendages and venoatrial
connections in hearts with patients with visceral heterotaxy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:561–9.
76. Valiathan MS, Balakrishnan KG, Kartha CC.Endomyocardial brosis. In: Ahuja MMS, editor.
Advances in clinical medicine. New Delhi: Churchill Livingstone; 1991. p.125–43.
77. Valiathan MS, Kartha CC.Endomyocardial brosis-the possible connexion with myocardial
levels of magnesium and cerium. Int J Cardiol. 1990;28:1–5.
78. Valiathan MS, Shyamkrishnan KG. Surgical treatment of endomyocardial brosis: Kerala
experience. In: Valiathan MS, Somers K, Kartha CC, editors. Endomyocardial brosis. New
Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1993. p.220–7.
79. Valiathan MS, Kartha CC, Eapen JT, Dang HS, Sunta CM.A geochemical basis for endomyocardial brosis. Cardiovasc Res. 1989;23:647–8.
80. Vrana JA, Theis JD, Dasari S, etal. Clinical diagnosis and typing of systemic amyloidosis in subcutaneous fat aspirates by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Haematologica.
2014;99(7):1239–47.
81. Wood P.Chronic constrictive pericarditis. Am J Cardiol. 1961;7:48–61.
82. Wood JA.Tuberculous pericarditis; a study of fortyone cases with special reference to prognosis. Am Heart J. 1951;42:737–45.
83. Wood DE, Crumbley AJ, Pereira NL. Reversible left ventricular dysfunction simulating a
myocardial infarction after pericardiectomy. Heart. 2002;88:183–4.
84. Wise DE, Conti CR. Constrictive pericarditis. In Pericardial Diseases (Ed. Spodick DH).
F.A.Davis, Philadelphia. Cardiovasc Clin. 1976;7(3):197–210.
85. White PD.Chronic constrictive pericarditis. Circulation. 1951;4(2):288–94.
87

88
https://t.me/medicina_free
86. Wychulis AR, Connolly DC, McGoon DC. Surgical treatment of pericarditis. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg. 1971;62:608–17.
87. White PD.Chronic constrictive pericarditis (Pick’s disease) treated by pericardial resection.
Lancet. 1935;2:597–603.
88. Westermark P, Benson MD, Buxbaum IN, etal. A primer of amyloid nomenclature. Amyloid
Int J Exp Clin lnvestig. 2007;14(3):179–83.
89. World Health Organization. Idiopathic cardiomegaly. Bull World Health Organ.
1968;38(6):979–92.
7 Clinical Presentation, Lab Investigations, andEndomyocardial Biopsy

Chapter 8
https://t.me/medicina_free
Imaging Studies andHaemodynamics
inChronic Constrictive Pericarditis
8.1 Chest Radiography
Chest radiography ndings are often suggestive of chronic constrictive pericarditis
and sometimes help to differentiate it from restrictive cardiomyopathy [112, 113].
Typically the cardiothoracic ratio is normal and lung elds are clear in patients with
chronic constrictive pericarditis. However, enlarged cardiac silhouette can be seen
in effusive-constrictive pericarditis, co-existing pericardial effusion, or in the presence of extracardiac masses [57–62, 113]. Pleural effusions are common and can be
an initial sign in 40% to 60% of cases [41–43, 137, 159, 168–184].
Findings suggestive of pulmonary tuberculosis have been reported in 30% to
70% of cases on chest roentgenogram. Patients with pulmonary venous congestion
due to elevated left-sided lling pressures exhibit signs of in the form of cephalization or equalization. In the published literature, 47% of cardiac silhouette are normal, 16% show mild, and 37% show moderate to massive enlargement (especially
in cases of effusive-constrictive pericarditis) [57–62, 113]. In 2001, Breen and associates reported evidence of occasional right-atrial and superior caval venous dilation
[8]. On uoroscopic examination, the cardiac pulsation may be diminished or
absent [104].
Presence of calcication over the right atrium, right ventricle, as well as atrioventricular grooves on lateral chest roentgenogram suggest tuberculosis [35]. Other
features strongly suggestive of chronic constrictive pericarditis are presence of Egg
shell calcication, Cocoon calcication, and amorphous calcication in the atrioventricular grooves (Figs.8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, and 8.5) [18–25, 59, 63, 104, 105, 181,
185]. Although calcication along the cardiac silhouette suggest diagnosis of
chronic constrictive pericarditis, its presence is not always conrmative since calcication can also occur without cardiac compression [114]. As stated by Lorell, “A
calcied pericardium is not necessarily a constricted one” [106, 186].
Ltd. 2023
U. K. Chowdhury, L. K. Sankhyan, Surgical Treatment of Chronic Constrictive
Pericarditis, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5808-5_8
89© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte

90
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
8 Imaging Studies andHaemodynamics inChronic Constrictive Pericarditis
a
Fig. 8.1 Frontal (a) and left lateral (b) chest radiographs reveal thick, plaque- like calcications
(arrowheads) over the diaphragmatic surface and free walls of both ventricles and along the atrioventricular groove
b
Fig. 8.2 Frontal (a) and left lateral (b) chest radiographs reveal plaque like calcications (arrowheads) over the diaphragmatic surface, anterior surface of the right ventricle and along atrioventricular groove
According to study by Ling and associates, among 135 patients undergoing surgery for chronic constrictive pericarditis, 36 had radiological signs of pericardial
calcication [104, 105]. In their study, 97% had calcication over the inferior/diaphragmatic surface of the heart, 76% had calcication on the anterior surface of the
heart over the right ventricle; and 62% had calcium deposits over the atrioventricular groove [104, 105]. McCaughan and associates reported 40% incidence of calcication in their study group [112]. Bertog and associates found pericardial
calcication in 55% of patients with idiopathic chronic constrictive pericarditis, in
10% of patients who were surgically treated, and in 6.7% with radiation-induced
chronic constrictive pericarditis. Patchy thin areas of calcication is suggestive of
adhesive pericarditis [9].

8.1 Chest Radiography
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 8.3 Frontal chest
radiograph shows plaque
like calcications
(arrowheads) over the
diaphragmatic surface of
the heart
Fig. 8.4 Lateral chest
roentgenogram reveals
extensive circumferential
pericardial calcication
(indicated by white arrows)
91
In our cumulative experience on 547 patients undergoing pericardiectomy for
chronic constrictive pericarditis, chest roentgenograms revealed pericardial calcication in 37%, pleural effusion in 40%, and pulmonary inltrates in 16.6% of

92
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 8.5 Chest radiograph
showing cardiac size
within normal limits,
pericardial calcication,
biatrial enlargement and
blunting of both CP angles
8 Imaging Studies andHaemodynamics inChronic Constrictive Pericarditis
patients [18–25]. Among them, 22.2% had calcication distributed over the anterior
and inferior surface of the heart, 10% had calcium around the atrioventricular
groove and “calcium cocoon” in 14.8% of patients. However there were no cases of
mitral annular calcication (Figs.8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, and 8.5) [18–25].
8.1.1 Overview ofSpecic Imaging Modalities
Pericardial non-invasive multimodality imaging can be performed using echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging, computed tomography scan (CT), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), radionuclide ventriculography, and/or Positron Emission
Tomography. Primary investigation for diagnosis is echocardiography. Further
investigations are done when echocardiography is non-diagnostic, or if additional
information is required such as the degree of pericardial thickness, inammation, or
calcication [2–6, 8–15, 18–35, 37, 40–56, 65–78, 80–103, 110, 111, 114–167,
179, 180, 186, 187, 190–194, 196–205, 213–218, 220–222, 232–237, 239, 240].
Although there exists no single echocardiographic nding to conrm the diagnosis, a normal study denitely rules out the diagnosis of chronic constrictive pericarditis. Echocardiography remains the initial investigation of choice because of its
wide spread availability, portability, low risk, and comparatively high resolution
[40, 115]. Several echocardiographic parameters have been proposed to differentiate chronic constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy and endomyocardial brosis. These parameters are measured on M-mode, 2D images, and
Doppler imaging [8–17, 85–92, 104–111, 145–147, 187, 188, 205–218, 232–239].
The ndings on Doppler imaging include diastolic ow reversal in the hepatic
veins accentuated with expiration, rapid early (E) diastolic lling (restrictive type of

8.2 Echocardiography
https://t.me/medicina_free
left ventricular lling pattern), increased tissue Doppler velocity of the medial
mitral annulus and reciprocal respiratory variation of mitral and tricuspid inow
Doppler velocities. About 15% of patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis
have a negative, equivocal or technically conrmed echocardiogram [239].
Limitation of echocardiography are inability to perform a comprehensive study
due to various patient factors and limited ability to assess pericardial thickness and
pericardial calcication. Multimodality imaging help to conrm diagnosis in challenging cases for echocardiography or suspected false negative cases on echocardiogram and acquire more information on morphological features [127–133].
Compared to cardiac magnetic resonance, computed tomography has higher spatial resolution, and is superior in visualizing pericardial thickness and calcication
[80, 160, 189, 213]. Computed tomography is also useful for patients with magnetic
resonance non-compatible implanted devices. Other advantages are ability to evaluate for pulmonary embolus and coronary artery disease.
93
8.2 Echocardiography
(a) Evaluation of the pericardial morphology
1. Pericardial thickening and calcication
The characteristic feature of pericardial thickening on echocardiogram is parallel
motion of the epicardium and parietal pericardium separated by approximately
1 mm wide relatively echo-free space [85–91, 93, 94]. The best view to assess
motion between the pericardial layers is the four-chamber subcostal view. Although
assessment of pericardial thickness and calcication using transthoracic echocardiography is inferior to computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance,
assessment with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) strongly correlates with
cardiac tomography [26, 27, 79, 85–91, 93, 94, 104, 105, 190].
Several investigators have demonstrated a pericardial thickness of more than
3mm obtained using transesophageal echocardiography having 95% sensitivity and
86% specicity for detection of the thickened pericardium [79, 104, 105]. The 2003
ACC/AHA/ASE Task Force recommends transesophageal echocardiography for
assessment of pericardial thickness to support the diagnosis of chronic constrictive
pericarditis (class IIB) [26, 27]. Echocardiography evaluation may be inadequate in
assessing pericardial thickness anterior to the right ventricle and near the right atrioventricular groove [26, 27, 39, 85].
2. Pericardial tethering
In the presence of pericardial adhesions, normal relative motion of the visceral
pericardium covering the heart inside the parietal pericardium is lost. It is difcult
to demonstrate this pericardial tethering by two-dimensional echocardiography.
However, tissue Doppler imaging and myocardial strain imaging offer diagnostic
information with a reported sensitivity and specicity of 88.8% and 94.8% respectively [62–69, 107, 160, 191–203, 221, 222].

94
https://t.me/medicina_free
8 Imaging Studies andHaemodynamics inChronic Constrictive Pericarditis
Unlike echo Doppler methods and tissue Doppler imaging which rely mostly on
longitudinal motion data, speckle tracking echocardiography can examine several
components or planes (i.e. radial, longitudinal and circumferential) in a single data
set. It can assess the torsional deformation of the myocardium in addition to strain
and strain rate. Speckle tracking echocardiography can also quantify the rocking or
swinging motion of the heart by measuring septal-to-lateral rotation displacement
(SLRD) [47–49, 70, 71, 85–91, 93, 94, 134, 135, 138–144, 148, 187–200, 220].
“Strain reversus” is a feature characterised by diminished negative peak systolic
strain in the free walls of left and right ventricles when compared with septal peak
systolic strain. It is seen when diseases affecting myocardial strain values are absent.
The sensitivity and specicity of left ventricular lateral wall strain to left ventricular
septal wall strain ratio<0.96 are 89% and 96% respectively [7]. The left and right
ventricular strain abnormalities are noted to cease following surgery [93]. A characteristic pattern observed following pericardiectomy is impaired early diastolic strain
rate of left atrial superior and lateral walls compared with the septal wall [116].
(b) Haemodynamic evaluation
Usually patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis have normal ventricular
dimensions with normal ejection fraction. However, deterioration occurs in
constrictive- restrictive disease and long-standing cases of chronic constrictive pericarditis with myocardial brosis/atrophy [161–163].
Doppler echocardiography relies on the presence of distinct atrial and ventricular
lling characteristics in relation to the respiratory cycle [10, 70, 71, 138–144]. In
about 50% of patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis, mitral inow velocity
decreases as much as 25% and tricuspid inow velocity increases considerably with
the rst heart beat after inspiration. In contrast, respiratory variation in patients with
restrictive cardiomyopathy does not differ signicantly from normal.
Echocardiographic correlates of the haemodynamic abnormalities of chronic
constrictive pericarditis include (i) dilation and blunted respiratory uctuation of the
hepatic veins and inferior caval vein, (ii) left atrial enlargement, (iii) abrupt displacement of the interventricular septum during early diastole (septal bounce), (iv) attening of the posterior wall of the left ventricle, and (v) increased hepatic ow reversal
with expiration. These ndings reect the dissociation of the intracardiac and intrathoracic pressures and interventricular interaction. However, these ndings of abnormal ventricular diastolic lling are not sensitive and lack specicity to be utilised for
clinical evaluation [2, 9, 10, 26, 27, 39, 47–49, 64–70, 138–144, 191–203].
(c) Abnormalities of interventricular septal motion
Due to constrictive pericarditis, the intracardiac pressures are dissociated from
changes in intrathoracic pressure during respiratory cycle. Respirophasic ventricular septal shift (VSS) is a characteristic diagnostic feature of constrictive pericarditis
on echocardiogram [2, 32, 46, 85–90, 122–126]. Ventricular interdependence can be
seen as diastolic interventricular septal shift posteriorly into the left ventricle with
inspiration, reecting left ventricular under lling, and anteriorly into the right

8.2 Echocardiography
https://t.me/medicina_free
95
ventricle with expiration, reecting recovery of left ventricular lling in the parasternal long axis view.
Dissociation of intracardiac and intrathoracic pressure in chronic constrictive
pericarditis means that with inspiration, the intrathoracic pressure declination is not
not fully transferred to the intracardiac chambers since they are isolated by a constricting pericardial cover. Consequently, left ventricular diastolic lling is reduced.
In chronic constrictive pericarditis, a relatively xed cardiac volume, coupled with
an increased right ventricular diastolic lling during inspiration, results in a leftward shift of the interventricular septum. The opposite change occurs during expiration [140, 141]. Although non-specic, another common nding in chronic
constrictive pericarditis is a septal shudder or bounce, which is an abrupt displacement of the interventricular septum in early diastole during each cardiac cycle [40].
Septal shudder corresponds to the dip and plateau sign observed on the right ventricular pressure tracing.
The early rapid lling phase causes abrupt increase in pressure in the right ventricle, initially pushing the interventricular septum towards the left ventricle. When
the right ventricular volume reaches its limit set by the non-compliant constrictive
pericardium, there is an abrupt halt in the rise of pressure and coincides with the rise
of pressure in the left ventricle, resulting in an abrupt anterior septal motion.
However a septal shudder should not be misinterpreted as ventricular septal shift.
The latter is a more specic diagnostic nding. Other characteristic features of
interventricular septal motion are early diastolic high-velocity on tissue Doppler
M-mode and polyphasic septal uttering motion on short-axis pulsed-wave tissue
Doppler imaging. (Figs.8.6 and 8.7) [199].
(d) Inferior caval vein size and hepatic vein ow pattern
Constrictive pericarditis is almost always associated with a dilated inferior caval
vein [120–126]. Diastolic ow reversal of hepatic venous ow during expiration can
be appreciated on pulsed Doppler interrogation. Velocity of hepatic vein diastolic
reverse ow/forward velocity gives the diastolic expiratory hepatic vein ow reversal ratio.(Figs. 8.8 and 8.9) [120–126, 138–144, 232].
A combination of ventricular septal shift with medial e′ ≥9 cm/s and diastolic
hepatic vein expiratory ow reversal ratio of ≥79% has a sensitivity and specicity
of 64% and 97% respectively, while a combined evaluation of ventricular septal
shift and medial e′ ≥9 cm/sec has a sensitivity and specicity of 87% and 91%,
respectively [232].
In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, there may be wide uctuations in
intrathoracic pressure with similar patterns of transmitral and transtricuspid Doppler
inow patterns. However, characteristic ndings in obstructive pulmonary disease
which help in differentiating from constrictive pericarditis are: lower E/A, prolonged deceleration time, and signicant increase in inspiratory systolic ow in
pulsed Doppler evaluation of superior caval vein while there is prominent diastolic
ow in constrictive pericarditis [10, 161].
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
