Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_103_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
44 Мб
Скачать
64
5.6.3 Analysis andEvaluation
By interpreting the patterns observed through the polariscope, optical professionals can assess the internal stress level in different materials. For example, if this is present toward the edges of the lens, it indicates that the lenses are t too tight, and if not modied, the lenses may have warpage and may chip off. If it is in the center, it indicates that the lens is polycarbonate. Patients may not face any visual disturbances, but these affect the mechanics and, in severe cases, inu­ence the quality of vision. Hence, this informa­tion is crucial for lens selection, frame tting, and ensuring the quality and durability of optical products.
5.7 Corneal Reex Pupillometer—Measuring Pupillary Distance
S. Maseedupalli
The corneal reex pupillometer is a specialized tool to accurately measure pupillary distance (PD) or interpupillary distance (IPD) (Fig. 5.7) [5]. The corneal reex pupillometer utilizes the reection of light from the cornea to determine the PD. It comprises a handheld device with a light source and a viewing lens. This measure­ment is essential for the precise tting of specta­cles and for ensuring optimal visual comfort for patients. Ill-tting spectacles can result in asthe­nopia, blurry or distorted vision, and visual dis­comfort and can inuence binocular vision. The eyes must work harder to adjust to the incorrect optical alignment.
PD is the distance between the center of the
pupil and the median plane.
IPD is the distance between the two pupil
centers.
5.7.1 Measuring Pupillary Distance (PD)
Step 1: Preparation: ensure that the patient is comfortable and relaxed and looking straight
Fig. 5.7 A corneal reex pupillometer or PD meter
ahead. Set the pupillometer to measure the PD for an innite distance.
Step 2: Positioning: hold the pupillometer with the headrest on the patient’s face. Align the patient’s eyes with the viewing lens of the pupillometer.
Step 3: Activating the light source: activate the light source of the pupillometer, which will cre­ate reections on the patient’s corneas.
Step 4: Identifying the pupil centers: direct the patient to focus on a distant target or a specic point. Observe the reections of the corneal light on each eye through the viewing lens. Identify the centers of the pupils based on the position of the corneal reections.
Step 5: Measuring PD: move the pupillometer to align the measurement markers with the identi­ed pupil centers. Read the displayed value on the pupillometer, which represents the PD.
The PD measures can also be done quickly in the clinic without a pupillometer.
5 Optical Dispensing
65
Step 1: The examiner and the patient should
sit at the same eye level.
Step 2: The examiner must be equipped with a
simple ruler and a torch for measurement.
Step 3: The examiner closes one of their eyes. For example, let’s say the examiner closes right eye.
Step 4: The patient is made to look at the eye that is kept open, which in this case is the exam­iner’s left eye.
Step 5: The light from the torch is directed into the patient’s eye for measurement.
Step 6: The zero mark of the ruler is posi­tioned to the patient’s right eye corneal reex (First Purkinje’s image).
Step 7: The value on the ruler that aligns with the median plane of the patient’s face is read and noted [6]. This reading provides the right eye PD (RE PD) of the patient.
Step 8: Now, the examiner closes left eye and opens right eye.
Step 9: The patient should look into the exam­iner’s right eye.
Step 10: The ruler is read while the zero mark is aligned to the median plane of the patient’s face, this time at the corneal reex of the patient’s left eye.
Step 11: This reading provides the left eye PD (LE PD). The torchlight must be shifted from the patient’s right eye to their left eye.
Step 12: The measurements for both RE PD and LE PD have been obtained.
Step 13: To nd the Interpupillary Distance (IPD), the RE PD and LE PD are added.
Step 14: Note that providing individual eye PD measurements (RE PD and LE PD) is more accurate than providing the IPD.
Step 15: The logic behind this method is that the patient’s right eye and left eye align parallel to the examiner’s open (opposite) eye, simulating distance viewing.
Step 16: Generally, subtracting approximately 3 mm from the distance IPD approximates the near IPD [6].
5.8 Conclusion
Each of the devices mentioned in this chapter is important for accurate optical dispensing. By being meticulous and using these devices cor­rectly, one could ensure spectacles t well and provide clear vision.
Funding Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, Hyderabad, India.
Disclosure None.
References
1. Brooks CW. System for ophthalmic dispensing. 3rd
ed. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2007.
2. Fannin TE, Grosvenor TP. Clinical optics.
Butterworths; 1987.
3. Alonso J, Gómez-Pedrero JA, Quiroga JA. Modern
ophthalmic optics. Cambridge University Press; 2019.
4. Manchikanti N, Maseedupalli S. Birefringence in
ophthalmic lenses. Indian J Ophthalmol Case Rep.
2021;1:455.
5. Elliott DB. Clinical procedures in primary eye care.
Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2007.
6. Gantz L, Shneor E, Doron R. Agreement and inter-
session repeatability of manual and automatic
interpupillary distance measurements. J Optom.
2021;14:299–314.
Extraocular Muscle Tests
andCover Tests
6
AparnaRaghuram andBenjaminJastrzembski
6.1 Introduction
Extraocular muscle (EOM) and cover tests are integral to ophthalmic examinations. These tests allow the clinician to detect the presence or absence of strabismus (ocular misalignment). Additionally, these tests give a wealth of informa­tion on both the afferent and efferent function of the eye and may diagnose cranial nerve palsies and even systemic diseases such as myasthenia gravis.
6.2 History
Extraocular muscle movement is described by two eponymous laws: Hering’s law of equal innervation and Sherrington’s law of reciprocal innervation. Sherrington’s law states that a mus­cle’s contraction is accompanied by the relax­ation of its antagonist muscle. For example, the contraction of the medial rectus muscle is accom­panied by the relaxation of the lateral rectus mus­cle in the same eye. Charles Sherrington won the 1932 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine
A. Raghuram Boston Children’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA e-mail: aparna.raghuam@childrens.harvard.edu
B. Jastrzembski (*) University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA e-mail: benjast@ucdavis.edu
for his work on this concept, as well as his work on synapses (a term he coined) and neuronal cir­cuits [1]. Hering’s law of equal innervation states that neural impulses to an EOM accompany an equal impulse to its synergistic EOM in the other eye. In other words, the neural impulse to one muscle is yoked to its partner muscle in the other eye. For example, the contraction of the medial rectus in the right eye is yoked to the contraction of the lateral rectus in the left eye, causing the eyes to have a conjugate movement to the left. The concept was developed in 1868 by the German scientist Ewald Hering, who also con­tributed to understanding color vision and respi­ratory reexes [2]. Although these concepts are described as “laws” they have exceptions, such as in Duane’s retraction syndrome.
6.3 Technology
The equipment to perform most EOM and cover tests in the clinical setting are simple: a xation target, loose prisms and/or prism bars, and a sim­ple occluder. Additional equipment, including Maddox rod lenses, red and green color lter lenses, a synoptophore, and a prism ipper, may sometimes be used. Maddox rods in trial frames are used to quantify cyclotorsion. A synopto­phore is a mechanical instrument that allows for the subjective and objective measurement of strabismus and assessment of retinal correspon-
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 T. Das, P. Satgunam (eds.), Ophthalmic Diagnostics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0138-4_6
67
68
A. Raghuram and B. Jastrzembski
dence and stereoacuity [3]. In addition to these mechanical instruments, software is also avail­able to measure strabismus.
6.4 Technique
6.4.1 Motility andVersions
In general, the rst EOM test to be performed is the motility test to check for the movements of both eyes. The patient is asked to follow a target, such as the examiner’s index nger, in all direc­tions of gaze. Although the task is easily per-
formed by a conscious, cooperative, and neurotypical patient, cooperation may be aided in children and those with cognitive impairments by using a toy to encourage attention. The head may be gently held to prompt eye movement rather than head movement in these cases. Normal, full versions (conjugate movements) of the eyes con­sist of unimpeded movement in all directions of gaze, with both eyes moving in the same direc­tion (Fig. 6.1). Under Hering’s Law, a pair of partner muscles, one from each eye, primarily drive the movement of the eyes in each of the six diagnostic positions of gaze (Fig. 6.2). Normal vergences refer to coordinated eye movement in
Fig. 6.1 The cardinal positions of gaze
Fig. 6.2 The six diagnostic positions of gaze. RSR right
superior rectus, RLR right lateral rectus, RIR right inferior rectus, LIO left inferior oblique, LMR left medial rectus,
LSO left superior oblique, RIO right inferior oblique,
RMR right medial rectus, RSO right superior oblique, LSR
left superior rectus, LLR left lateral rectus, LIR left infe­rior rectus
6 Extraocular Muscle Tests andCover Tests
69
different directions (disconjugate movements) to achieve xation on a near or distant target.
If the versions and vergences are full, there is no indication for further extraocular muscle test­ing during most eye examinations. Normal ver­sions and vergences typically demonstrate that the cranial nerves serving the EOMs are func­tioning as expected, that the brain stem nuclei of the cranial nerves and the higher level central nervous system visual processing centers are intact, that each eye has at least some vision, that there are no gross abnormalities of the orbit (e.g., a large mass or a fracture) restricting movement, and the EOMs themselves are functioning. Given the number of processes required for normal EOM motility, the EOM motility test may be considered a “vital sign” of the eye examination, analogous to a heart rate or blood pressure mea­surement in the general medical examination.
However, on an initial EOM motility test, it can be easy to miss subtle underaction or overac­tion in motility. Notably, Sherrington’s law of reciprocal innervation dictates that not only is EOM underaction abnormal, but overaction of an EOM is abnormal as well. Therefore, in the set­ting of the strabismus or neuro-ophthalmology clinic, or when there is concern about an abnor­mality of the EOMs, additional testing beyond the fundamental EOM motility test is indicated.
6.4.2 Ductions
A reasonable second test to perform after the test­ing of EOM versions is the test of EOM ductions with one eye open and the other eye covered, especially when abnormalities are detected in the versions testing. Ductions are dened as the
movement of a single, isolated eye, in contrast to the versions, which refer to movements with both eyes open. The terms used to describe the duction movements of a single eye are supraduction, infraduction, abduction (away from the nose in the horizontal), adduction (towards the nose), incyclotorsion (incycloduction), and excyclotor­sion (excycloduction). Each of the six extraocu­lar muscles has a primary action described with this terminology, and the superior and inferior muscles have secondary and tertiary actions (Table6.1).
Duction testing may be useful to highlight subtle underaction that may be difcult to observe with version testing, especially when an overac­tion is the most obvious nding on version test­ing. For example, a patient with a partial VI (abducens) cranial nerve palsy of the right eye, when observed with both eyes open, may show obvious overaction of adduction in the left eye due to Hering’s Law and little to no limitation in abduction of the right eye. With the right eye closed, ductions of the left eye will be normal, and with the left eye closed, ductions of the right eye may demonstrate a subtle abduction decit.
6.4.3 Ocular Alignment
Abnormalities in ocular alignment are catego­rized as heterotropia (tropia) or heterophoria (phoria). A tropia is a misalignment of the eye that occurs without disassociation and may be observed with both eyes open. It may be constant or intermittent. A phoria is a latent misalignment observed only after breaking fusion between the eyes. Observation of a phoria is most commonly observed by covering an eye to break fusion. In
Table 6.1 Actions of the extraocular muscles
Muscle Primary action Secondary action Tertiary action Medial rectus Adduction – Lateral rectus Abduction – Superior rectus Elevation Intorsion Adduction Inferior rectus Depression Extorsion Adduction Superior oblique Intorsion Depression Abduction Inferior oblique Extorsion Elevation Abduction
Adapted from Table1.1 of Rowe (2012) [3]
70
A. Raghuram and B. Jastrzembski
other words, the phoria is observed when the brain does not have normal afferent input from the eyes to maintain ocular alignment.
Clinically, the terms heterotropia or hetero­phoria are infrequently used. Rather, the strabis­mus is named based on the direction of misalignment. An esodeviation, either an esopho­ria or esotropia, is dened as a deviation toward the nose; an exodeviation, either an exophoria or exotropia, is dened as a deviation away from the nose; a hypertropia or hyperphoria as a deviation upwards or cranial; and a hypotropia or hypopho­ria as a deviation downwards or caudal.
Given that xation depends on vision, all tests that measure ocular alignment should be per­formed with the patient’s best possible correction in place.
6.4.3.1 Tests Based ontheLight Reex
The next tests to perform are the Hirschberg and Krimsky tests, which estimate the patient’s stra­bismus, if present. In the Hirschberg test, a pen­light is directed at the patient’s open eyes from a distance of about 1/3 of a meter, and the clinician characterizes any deviation of the corneal light reex to estimate the strabismus. Alternatively, a ash photograph may provide analogous infor­mation. Many eyes with normal alignment may appear slightly exotropic on Hirschberg testing due to a small nasal displacement of the corneal light reex. This normal, slightly exotropic appearance is due to the temporal location of the fovea in relation to the center of the pupil; it is referred to as a positive angle kappa. In these cases, cover testing will demonstrate normal alignment—also called orthophoria. In the Krimsky test, a penlight is shone at the patient’s open eyes from a distance of about 1/3 of a meter. A loose prism or prism bar is placed over the deviated eye to center the corneal reex. If the prism is placed over the xating eye to center the deviating eye’s corneal reex, it is called the Modied Krimsky test. Using the dimmest light possible is advisable as a bright penlight may be dissociative for some people. Since the Hirschberg and Krimsky tests do not interfere with xation, they only measure tropia, not phoria.
6.4.3.2 Cover Tests
Cover testing provides a more accurate character­ization of strabismus than Hirschberg and Krimsky testing. However, eyes with the best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/200 will not be able to xate on a target reliably enough to make cover testing useful. In these situations, the Hirschberg and Krimsky tests must be relied on. The patient must also cooperate with cover test­ing by actively xating on the target of interest. It is important for the examiner to encourage the patient to actively xate on the object and be aware that poor cooperation may lead to mislead­ing results, especially in children who may nd cooperation challenging.
The cover test begins with covering the xat­ing eye or eye with better vision with an occluder and observing any movement of the other, weaker eye. The occlusion interrupts afferent input from the stronger eye, and the brain is forced to switch xation to the weaker eye. This is the cover test. The rexation movement of the weaker eye reveals the direction of strabismus: an observed movement away from the nose is an esodevia­tion, and a movement toward the nose is an exo­deviation. The speed of rexation reects the vision in the weaker eye as well as the attention of the patient. An eye with poor vision or a patient with impaired attention or cognition will have slower rexation. The magnitude of the tropia may be quantied by adding a plastic prism in the visual plane over the weaker eye as the occluder is placed over the stronger, xating eye. The magnitude of the prism required to eliminate all rexation movement in the weaker eye quanties the tropia. This test is called the simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT).
If the vision is equal or close to it in both eyes, the cover test should be repeated with the occluder placed on each eye. The tests are also typically repeated in the primary position, with the eyes xating on a near (1/3 m) or distant (6 m) target and in the secondary directions of gaze at a distance. If no rexation movement is observed on the cover test, then no tropia is pres­ent, although a phoria may exist.
To quantify a phoria, the prism and alternate cover test (PACT) is performed. In this test, the
6 Extraocular Muscle Tests andCover Tests
71
occluder is alternated between the two eyes, and a prism is placed over the weaker eye to neutralize any rexation movement. The prism diopters mea­sured in the PACT test are the sum of the deviation combining both the phoria and tropia. The expected normal deviation range for distance is 1
Δ exophoria ±2 Δ and for near 3 Δ exophoria ±3 Δ [4]. If no tropia were observed previously with
the cover test, the measurement would quantify the phoria only. When the prism is placed over the stronger eye during the PACT, the measurement is called the primary deviation. If the prism is instead placed over the weaker eye, the measurement is referred to as the secondary deviation. The second­ary deviation is always larger than the primary deviation. The PACT is frequently repeated in multiple directions of gaze at a distance. Incomitance in the angle of deviation (i.e., a differ­ence in the measured prism diopters of strabismus in different directions of gaze) is an important clue for paretic strabismus secondary to cranial nerve palsy. For example, a patient with a right VI (abdu­cens) cranial nerve palsy will show an esotropia, greater in the right gaze than in the left gaze, and this incomitance will be revealed by testing with the PACT in multiple directions of gaze.
If the magnitude of the deviation is so large that one prism is insufcient the prisms may be stacked in the same direction on a single eyeor a singleprism may be placedover each eye, which is preferable. Similarly, if a vertical and horizon­tal strabismus exists, a horizontal prism may be placed over one eye and a vertical prism over the other. In these cases, the use of multiple prisms should be noted in the documentation. As the deviation becomes larger, the accuracy of the measurement decreases.
6.4.4 Vergence Testing
Vergence describes two eyes moving in opposite directions (disconjugate eye movements). Detailed vergence testing informs us on how well the eyes are working together [410]. Convergence is dened as the vergence when both eyes move toward the nose, and divergence is away from the nose. Supravergence describes
when one eye moves upwards relative to the other, and infravergence is when one eye moves downwards relative to the other. Appropriate refractive correction should be worn before ver­gence testing begins.
6.4.4.1 Near Point ofConvergence
To assess vergence, start by measuring the maxi­mum ability of the eyes to converge by determin­ing the near point of convergence (NPC). In this test, an accommodative target size two steps larger than the maximum resolvable size is rec­ommended (typically, a 20/30 single letter or ver­tically aligned letters is/are used) (Fig.6.3a). The target is placed approximately 60 cm from the eyes and moved at about 1cm per second closer toward the eyes. The patient is asked to maintain focus on the target, to keep the target single, and to report when it splits into two. The distance from the middle of the forehead to the point when the target can no longer be perceived as single is recorded as the NPC “break” in cms. Next, the target is moved back along the midline to where fusion is recovered; that is, the target becomes single. This distance is recorded as “recovery.” A “break” measure of 6cm or less is normal in chil­dren, adolescents, and young adults [7, 8]. It is important to note that the reference point of mea­sure is from the middle of the forehead (Figs.6.3a,
b and 6.4a). If NPC is measured from the lateral
canthus or tip of the nose as a reference, it cannot be compared to the 6cm cut-off as it will lead to an overestimation or underestimation. When measured from the lateral canthus, the NPC can be, on average, 1–2 cm more than when mea­sured from the forehead [5]. Variability in human anatomy and morphology across gender, race, and ethnicity can also affect the normal range. Measuring from the tip of the nose should be avoided due to signicantly higher variability in nose sizes across the population.
Sometimes, the patient may not report the tar­get doubling due to suppression. In that instance, the examiner notes when fusion is lost by keenly observing one eye drifting out. This objectively measures the “break” (Fig. 6.4b). When the patient is unable to report a doubling of the target due to strong suppression, the test can be repeated
72
ab c
d
ab
A. Raghuram and B. Jastrzembski
e
Fig. 6.3 Tools for measuring the near point of conver­gence. (a) A near xation stick with a vertical row of let­ters; (b) a near point rule to place between forehead and
Fig. 6.4 Measuring the near point of convergence. (a) An example of how the test is performed; (b) an objective mea- sure (red arrow) of when fusion is broken is noted as a break on the “near point” of convergence testing
with a red lens (Fig.6.3c) placed in front of one eye and room lights dimmed or switched off. A penlight (Fig. 6.3d) is moved toward the eyes,
measure distance; (c) a red lens; (d) a transillumination light; (e) a pair of red and green glasses
the test results improve with the +1.00 DS lenses, this suggests that the accommodative system was the driver of the convergence decit.
and the patient is asked to report when they see two separate lights, one red and one yellow. A red/green glass (Fig. 6.3e) can also be used instead of just a red lens, and the patient would be asked to report when they see the light split into red and green lights [7]. If convergence is limited due to poor accommodation, the test can be repeated with a +1.00 DS lens on a trial frame or held over the patient’s glasses, and the NPC test can be repeated with an accommodative target. If
6.4.4.2 Fusional Vergence Ranges
Next, we measure fusional vergence ranges, which estimate how much the eyes can move horizontally (converge and diverge) and verti­cally (move up or down) while maintaining sin­gle vision. Prism bars are introduced while the patient looks at a 20/40 or 20/30 letter size target for distance and near vision testing, respectively. Vertically aligned letters of the same letter sizes
ab c
6 Extraocular Muscle Tests andCover Tests
Fig. 6.5 Fusional ranges testing: (a) the xation target used for testing; (b) the horizontal and vertical prism bars used for testing; (c) a demonstration of the fusional divegence range limit; (d) a demonstration of the fusional convergence range limit
73
d
(Fig.6.5a) for horizontal ranges and horizontally aligned letters for vertical ranges or a single letter are ideal targets.
6.4.4.2.1 Horizontal Vergence
For horizontal fusional ranges, a prism bar with a base-in conguration (Fig.6.5c; the wide edge of the prism is closer to the nose) is placed before one eye, and its strength is increased at 2 prism diopters per second. At the 20-prism diopter level, the rate of diopter change increases to 5 prism diopters per second. This is due to a preset diop­tric change of a prism bar. The patient is rst asked to report when the target gets blurry when it splits into two (double, horizontally separated), and when it returns to a single target. These nd­ings are recorded as blur, break, and recovery in prism diopters. Some patients may not report blur or report blur and break at the same time. The divergence amplitude is the prism diopter recorded at blur or break (when blur is not reported).
Note: When testing divergence amplitude for distance with adequately corrected refractive error, we do not expect “blur” to be reported as accommodation is fully relaxed. The steps are repeated with a prism bar in the base-out (Fig. 6.5d; the wide edge of the prism is away from the nose) direction to record the convergence amplitude. The results are noted as convergence ranges/divergence ranges, distance/near, and blur/ break/recovery in prism diopters [410].
Mechanism of action: When the prism bar is oriented in the base in a direction in front of either the right or left eye, the light rays bend toward the base of the prism, shifting the image viewed, nasally, away from the fovea. For the visual system to see the target as a single image, the eye must diverge to land the fovea to where the image is displaced. When the eye reaches its threshold, and the patient cannot diverge his/her eyes any further, the patient will perceive the tar­get doubling or being seen as two.
When the prism bar is oriented in the base-out direction before the right or left eye, the light rays bend toward the base of the prism, shifting the image viewed temporally away from the fovea. For the visual system to see the viewed target as single, the eye must converge to land the fovea where the image is displaced. When the eye reaches its threshold, and the patient cannot con­verge his/her eyes any further, the patient will perceive the target doubling or being seen as two.
When measured at a distance, the inuence of accommodation is minimal, but the interplay of accommodation with vergence cannot be dis­counted at near-testing distances. Retinal dispar­ity, that is, dissimilar images on the fovea, drives fusional vergence. When testing near the xed distance, using letters as targets and making the patient call out the letters helps to keep accom­modation under control. However, accommoda­tion can be driven along with fusional vergence
74
A. Raghuram and B. Jastrzembski
to keep the target clear and single. On horizontal fusional vergence testing, if the patient reports a “blur,” that is the point till which fusional ver­gence has helped drive control; following this, accommodative vergence primarily drives con­trol until the target splits into two and fusion can no longer be maintained.
Expected values for adolescent and young adults for distance: divergence range (prism diopters Δ): break = 5–9 and recovery = 3–5; convergence range (Δ): blur = 7–11, break = 15–23, and recovery = 8–12. For near divergence range (Δ): blur = 11–15, break = 19–23, and recovery = 10–16; conver­gence range (Δ): blur=14–20, break=18–24, and recovery=7–15 [4, 1114].
6.4.4.2.2 Vertical Ranges
A prism bar with the base up or down is placed before one eye and moved 1 prism diopter per second to measure vertical ranges. The patient is asked to report when the target splits into two (double, vertically separated), and the prism power is lowered in magnitude to record when the target returns to being single. The break is recorded as right infravergence or left supraver­gence when the prism is placed base up before the right eye and right supravergence or left infravergence when the prism is placed base down before the right eye.
Note: supravergence in one eye is equivalent to infravergence in the other eye.
Mechanism of action: When a vertical prism is placed before one eye, for example, base down before the right eye, the light rays bend toward the base of the prism, shifting the image below the fovea in the right eye relative to the left eye. To maintain single vision, the right eye must move upwards (toward the apex of the prism) to bring the image back to the fovea (supraver­gence) and maintain single vision. When the base-up prism is placed in front of the right eye, the light rays bend toward the base of the prism, shifting the image above the fovea in the right eye relative to the left eye. To maintain single vision, the right eye must move downwards (toward the apex of the prism) to bring the image back to the fovea (infravergence) and maintain single vision.
The inuence of accommodation is not expected for vertical fusional ranges; hence, patients do not report blur and only report double when fusion is not maintained. The expected val­ues for both supravergence and infravergence for distance and near vision are approximately 2–4 Δ for the break and 1–3 Δ for the recovery [4].
6.4.4.3 Eciency oftheVergence
System
The vergence facility is a nuance test to assess the efciency or exibility of the vergence system. A 12-prism base-out and a 3-prism base-in ippers are used for testing. Testing is done for both dis­tance and near vision using a single or vertical column of letters (20/40–20/30 size) (Fig.6.6a,
Fig. 6.6 Vergence facility testing. (a) A xation stick with a vertical column of letters used for testing; (b) 12-prism base-out and 3-prism base-in wedge; (c) the eyes’ response to a convergence demand (12-prism base-out); and (d) the eyes’ response to a divergence demand (3-prism base-in)
ab c
d