Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_103_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
44 Мб
Скачать
220
ab
A. Panigrahi et al.
tion of the iris in the left eye; the right eye appeared normal, except for a temporally pulled pupillary ruff (Fig.18.8a). Hence, right eye primary open-angle glaucoma and left eye neovascular glaucoma (NVG) were diag­nosed. A detailed gonioscopic evaluation revealed the presence of a single strand of neovascularization at the angle in the temporal angle corresponding to the site of the pulled pupillary ruff, visible only at higher magni­cations (Fig.18.8b). The diagnosis was even­tually changed to NVG for both eyes. Thus, a detailed gonioscopic evaluation helped make an appropriate diagnosis.
Other important uses of gonioscopy are iden­tifying angle occludability, staging angle clo­sure, and proper management. Labeling an occludable angle open after a brief screening
under high illumination by a novice is a common mistake. Misdiagnosing angle closure glaucoma (ACG) as open-angle glaucoma (OAG) can be catastrophic, considering the aggressive course and potentially blinding nature of ACG. Most iridotrabecular contact in ACG occurs during pupil dilation when the risk of a pupillary block is the highest and the amount of iridotrabecular contact is maximum. This results in progressive damage to the PTM, resulting in outow dys­function and elevated IOP.Hence, it is valuable to simulate this aggravating condition as closely and safely as possible to assess the actual risk of development and progression of glaucoma. To assess angle closure, it is important to determine the angle structures under the thinnest slit and dimmest illumination possible (Fig. 18.9a and
b), which permits a proper estimation of the
occludability.
Fig. 18.8 An anterior segment photograph of the patient’s right eye (a) shows ruff atrophy with early ectro­pion uvea in the temporal pupillary margin (white arrow).
a
Right (b): gonioscopic examination revealed an open angle with the presence of a single new vessel (black arrow), crossing the scleral spur to reach Schwalbe’s line
b
Fig. 18.9 Goniophotograph of an occludable angle. Only Schwalbe’s line is seen on minimal illumination (a). Upon increasing the width and brightness of the slit, pigmenta-
tion of the posterior trabecular meshwork can be seen (b), signifying occludability with appositional closure
18 Gonioscopy
221
18.7 Systems forAutomated
Goniophotography
Recently, systems for goniophotography have been developed to image the anterior chamber angle without using a conventional gonioscope, thus reducing human variations and errors. These systems utilize a contact lens system and cou­pling agent, similar to a conventional gonioscope system. Examples of such specialized systems include the following.
1. RetCam, NGS-1 automated gonioscope, the
GonioPEN, and axicon lens-assisted gonios­copy [6]. The RetCam (Natus Medical Incorporated, Pleasanton, CA) is a handheld retinal and angiographic camera primarily developed to screen retinopathy of prematu­rity. It can also visualize the anterior chamber angle using its B1200 lens with a 120° eld of view. It has shown good sensitivity, specic­ity, and excellent diagnostic performance for detecting gonioscopic angle closure, espe­cially when using the denition of two­quadrant angle closure for diagnosis [7].
2. The NGS-1 automated gonioscope (Nidek,
Gamagori, Japan) is a recently commercial­ized contact-based automated goniophotogra­phy device that can capture 16 sections over a 360° angle in less than 1min [8, 9]. The main advantage of this system is the shorter image capture time and learning curve compared to manual gonioscopy. However, poor resolution of the trabecular meshwork due to defocus remains a problem. Hence, the jury is still not out regarding using this system in routine clinical practice.
3. The GonioPEN combines a miniaturized
charge-coupled diode camera with a light­emitting diode, both integrated into a probe that can be used as a slit-lamp attachment. It is placed near the limbus to visualize structures of the opposite iridocorneal angle [10].
4. The axicon lens-assisted gonioscopy is a
potential alternate mechanism for gonioscopic visualization and imaging, which is currently under development. It integrates the concept of Bessel beam microscopy, which enables
accurate imaging of the anterior chamber angle to a spatial resolution of 3 μm. It has been used to visualize the anterior chamber angle in bovine [11] and rabbit [12] eyes; fur­ther studies are needed to validate this tech­nology for use in human eyes.
18.8 Technological Adjuncts toGonioscopy
Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) was one of the rst devices to aid in gonioscopic diagnosis. It employs high-frequency ultrasonic waves, which help in the detailed imaging of the anterior chamber and angle structures. It is instrumental in visualizing the morphology of the ciliary body. It is useful in detecting angle closure glaucoma, especially differentiating between the major sub­groups of primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG). Iridotrabecular contact with a convex iris conguration suggests a pupillary block mechanism (Fig. 18.10a). A deep central and a shallow peripheral anterior chamber due to an anteriorly rotated ciliary body (Fig.18.10b), with partial or complete obliteration of the iridociliary sulcus, suggests a plateau iris conguration. A ciliary body cyst may be present, causing an ante­rior shift in the ciliary body (Fig.18.10c). This leads to an appearance similar to the plateau iris conguration and is termed as pseudo plateau iris conguration. The latter two can be gonioscopi­cally identied based on the presence of “sine wave iris conguration” and “lumpy, bumpy appearance,” respectively. Differentiation between the three groups is necessary, as the pupillary block mechanism is amenable to laser iridotomy, whereas the other two are refractory. Occasionally, a ciliary body melanoma may be noted, leading to secondary angle closure. UBM is also used in children with hazy corneas to eval­uate the angle of closure. This allows differentia­tion between primary congenital glaucoma and secondary glaucoma, aiding in prognostication and decision-making.
Recently, swept-source anterior segment opti­cal coherence tomography (AS-OCT) has been used in the stratication of the risk of develop-
222
ab c
A. Panigrahi et al.
Fig. 18.10 Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) ndings of the three mechanisms of primary angle closure mecha­nism: pupillary block (a), plateau iris conguration (b),
ment of PACG. It employs a beam of longer wavelength (1310 nm) and lower penetration than retinal OCT, hence facilitating the detailed imaging of the AC. Recent studies have shown that the detection of the anatomic angle closure by AS-OCT parameters like angle opening dis­tance and trabecular iris space area is more strongly correlated to the risk of progression to glaucoma, as compared to gonioscopic angle clo­sure [1315]. This result is not an anomaly; where human evaluation is tainted with varia­tions due to illumination, pressure, eye move­ment, and the individuality of the examiner, machines are highly automated with the ability to simulate the optimal conditions for imaging. A 360° evaluation of the angle using AS-OCT to rule out any form of iridotrabecular contact before delaying the institution of laser iridotomy may help prevent progression and thereby reduce the burden of angle closure disease.
18.9 Gonioscopy andUsing Articial Intelligence
With the latest technological advancement, arti­cial intelligence is increasingly used for classify­ing medical images, often performing better than manual grading [16, 17]. It is used in aiding gonioscopic diagnosis of open-angle and angle closure glaucoma. Both these diagnoses are enabled by sequential and segmental SS-OCT scans, which are further analyzed by various deep learning (DL) models. The efcacy of these DL models is assessed by the area under curve
and pseudo plateau iris conguration due to multiple cili­ary body cysts (c)
(AUC) enclosed by the receiver operator charac­teristic curves, with a higher AUC indicating a more accurate model.
Many DL models have been used in assessing and further classifying angle closure disease. Earlier models used scans obtained on UBM [18], or a single AS-OCT [19] or SS-OCT [20] scan obtained over either meridian, where the vertical scans were more accurate than the hori­zontal scans for detecting angle closure. The lat­est advancements include the circumferential assessment of angle using SS-OCT scans obtained over 360° of the anterior chamber angle (Casia 2, Tomey Corporation, Japan). A recent study using a novel DL algorithm using circum­ferential SS-OCT scans has noted that the cut-off of 35° of circumferential iridotrabecular con­tact was the most accurate for diagnosing gonio­scopic angle closure, with high sensitivity and specicity [21]. A lower cut-off value, although more sensitive, has extremely low specicity for diagnosing angle closure. Similarly, a higher cut- off has very low sensitivity for diagnosing angle closure, despite being extremely specic. Interestingly, the AUC noted in this study with a 35% cut-off was similar to the performance of a semiautomated built-in software called the “ITC index” [22]. Calculation of this ITC index depends on the manual marking of the scleral spur by the operator; hence, it is prone to inter­observer variability and aberrant results. On the other hand, DL models are entirely automated and do not require manual marking of the scleral spur, resulting in a faster and more accurate assessment of gonioscopic angle closure.
18 Gonioscopy
223
DL models also can classify different morpho­logical patterns of juvenile open-angle glaucoma (JOAG) into various clusters. These clusters can be divided by the iris and gonioscopic features, age of onset, and baseline IOP. A recent study revealed that abnormal iris morphology and a high iris insertion correlate more closely with a higher IOP and worse visual prognosis [23]. Such a phenotypic classication of JOAG can help in the stratication of severity when screen­ing such patients.
18.10 Conclusion
This chapter explored the optics and techniques of gonioscopy and highlighted its signicance in evaluating and managing glaucoma. The techno­logical advances discussed can assist manual gonioscopy for better diagnoses and management of glaucoma but cannot replace it. Hence, mas­tery of this technique is essential. Gonioscopy is an acquired art, and optimal utilization of the procedure requires considerable personal experi­ence. However, awareness of the sources of error and the proper interpretation of the ndings would result in a shorter learning phase.
Funding None.
Disclosure None.
References
1. Scheie HG.Width and pigmentation of the angle of the anterior chamber; a system of grading by goni­oscopy. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1957;58(4):510–2.
2. Spaeth GL. The normal development of the human anterior chamber angle: a new system of descriptive grading. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1971;91:709–39.
3. Spaeth GL. Gonioscopy: uses old and new. The inheritance of occludable angles. Ophthalmology. 1978;85(3):222–32.
4. Spaeth GL, Azuara-Blanco A, Araujo SV, Augsburger JJ. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in evaluating the anterior chamber angle congura­tion by ultrasound biomicroscopy. J Glaucoma. 1997;6(1):13–7.
5. Shaffer RN.Primary glaucomas Gonioscopy, ophthal­moscopy and perimetry. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1960;64:112–27.
6. Porporato N, Bell KC, Perera SA, Aung T. Non­optical coherence tomography modalities for assessment of angle closure. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2022;12(4):409–14.
7. Perera SA, Baskaran M, Friedman DS, Tun TA, Htoon HM, Kumar RS, etal. Use of EyeCam for imaging the anterior chamber angle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(6):2993–7.
8. Matsuo M, Mizoue S, Nitta K, Takai Y, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement among anterior chamber angle evaluations using automated 360-degree gonio-photos. Huang J, editor. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251249.
9. Teixeira F, Sousa DC, Leal I, Barata A, et al. Automated gonioscopy photography for iridocorneal angle grading. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;30(1):112–8.
10. Shinoj VK, Murukeshan VM, Baskaran M, Aung T. Integrated exible handheld probe for imaging and evaluation of iridocorneal angle. J Biomed Opt. 2015;20(1):016014.
11. Perinchery SM, Shinde A, Fu CY, et al. High resolu­tion iridocorneal angle imaging system by axicon lens assisted gonioscopy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30844.
12. Hong XJJ, Suchand Sandeep CS, etal. Noninvasive and noncontact sequential imaging of the Iridocorneal angle and the cornea of the eye. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(5):1.
13. Gupta B, Angmo D, Yadav S, etal. Quantication of Iridotrabecular contact in primary angle-closure dis­ease. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(8):681–8.
14. Zhang X, Guo PY, Lin C, et al. Assessment of iris trabecular contact in eyes with Gonioscopic angle­closure. Ophthalmology. 2023;130(1):111–9.
15. Xu BY, Friedman DS, Foster PJ, etal. Ocular biomet­ric risk factors for progression of primary angle clo­sure disease: the Zhongshan angle closure prevention trial. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(3):267–75.
16. Carin L, Pencina MJ.On deep learning for medical image analysis. JAMA. 2018;320(11):1192–3.
17. Grzybowski A, Brona P, Lim G, etal. Articial intel­ligence for diabetic retinopathy screening: a review. Eye Lond Engl. 2020;34(3):451–60.
18. Shi G, Jiang Z, Deng G, etal. Automatic classication of anterior chamber angle using ultrasound biomi­croscopy and deep learning. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(4):25.
19. Fu H, Baskaran M, Xu Y, etal. A deep learning sys­tem for automated angle-closure detection in anterior segment optical coherence tomography images. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;203:37–45.
20. Xu BY, Chiang M, Chaudhary S, et al. Deep learn­ing classiers for automated detection of Gonioscopic angle closure based on anterior segment OCT images. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;208:273–80.
224
A. Panigrahi et al.
21. Porporato N, Tun TA, Baskaran M, etal. Towards “auto­mated gonioscopy”: a deep learning algorithm for 360° angle assessment by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;106(10):1387–92.
22. Baskaran M, Ho SW, Tun TA, et al. Assessment of circumferential angle-closure by the iris–
trabecular contact index with swept-source opti­cal coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(11):2226–31.
23. Birla S, Gupta D, Somarajan BI, etal. Classifying juve­nile onset primary open angle glaucoma using cluster analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(6):827–35.
Optic Disc Photography
K.GowriPratinya , AparnaRao , PallaviRay, andBhoomiThakkar
19
19.1 Introduction
Ophthalmic disc photography is a valuable tool in glaucoma care. It allows precise documentation and analysis of the optic disc, which is crucial for glaucoma evaluation. The history parallels the evolution of imaging technology and contributed signicantly to diagnosing and managing glau­coma and several other ocular conditions. Using specialized software installed in the cameras, it provides accurate optic disc images for objective quantication and characterization of the disc for enhanced patient care. This chapter explores the historical developments, equipment, techniques, image interpretation, clinical applications, and future directions of optic disc photography.
19.2 History ofOphthalmic Photography
The history of ophthalmic photography dates back to the mid-nineteenth century when Jackman and Webster published the rst retinal
image of a living human subject [1]. The optic disc was faintly visible due to strong reexes from the cornea. It was not until the twentieth century that fundus photography became an established technique for optic disc imaging [2]. In 1911, a large reex-free ophthalmoscope invented by Alvar Gullstrand viewed the fundus through the upper pupil reducing unwanted reexes from the cornea [3]. the Zeiss-Nordenson camera was designed and introduced in 1925 using this principle [4]. These cameras allowed for more accurate and standardized optic disc measurements. The advent of digital imaging in the 1990s enabled good-quality optic disc photography.
19.3 Optic Nerve Photography
Optic disc photography has become an important part of glaucoma screening for objective and quantitative measurements enabling early detec­tion and management. It also plays a vital role in telemedicine.
K. G. Pratinya · A. Rao (*) Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India e-mail: kolipaka.pratinya@lvpei.org; aparna@lvpei.org
P. Ray · B. Thakkar Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India e-mail: pallavi.ray@lvpei.org;
bhoomi.Thakkar@lvpei.org
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 T. Das, P. Satgunam (eds.), Ophthalmic Diagnostics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0138-4_19
19.3.1 Monoscopic Color Fundus Photography
Monoscopic color fundus photography is a widely used technique for capturing detailed retina and optic disc images. Monoscopic photography pro-
225
226
K. G. Pratinya et al.
Fig. 19.1 A color fundus monoscopic photograph of the right eye (left) showing a tilted suspicious myopic disc. A color fundus monoscopic photograph of the right eye
duces a two-dimensional optic disc image by employing a single-lens camera system. This technique provides quick images for reference, but due to the inability of the technique to capture the three-dimensional structure of the optic disc, at times, assessing the depth and contour of the optic nerve head is often challenging. This is more acutely observed in myopic disc assessment, where the cupping can be very shallow (Fig.19.1).
19.3.2 Red-Free Photography
Red-free photography, also known as green or blue lter photography, is an imaging technique to visualize the retinal nerve ber layer (RNFL). It captures images of the optic disc and retina with a specic lter that blocks red light, allow­ing only green or blue light to pass. In red-free photography, the RNFL appears as a darker shade against the background of the retinal layers. Since the RNFL contains melanin, a pigment that absorbs green and blue light more than red light, eliminating red light (which is predominantly absorbed by the other retinal layers) can selec­tively accentuate the RNFL, making it easier to detect defects; this is red-free photography.
(right) showing a glaucomatous disc with inferior excava­tion and inferior nerve ber layer thinning (yellow arrow)
Clinical application: Red-free photography reduces the visibility of the blood vessels by min­imizing their background contrast, allowing the identication of the RNFL (Fig.19.2).
19.3.3 Stereoscopic Images
Stereoscopic images of the optic disc are obtained by taking two images of the optic disc from slightly different angles, mimicking the binocular vision that our eyes naturally provide. In the ste­reoscopic camera system, either two camera lenses or two separate cameras are positioned slightly apart horizontally. This simultaneous capture of the optic disc from slightly different angles creates the necessary parallax and enables the brain to perceive the depth. Once the two images are captured, they can be viewed together using a stereoscope or a specialized device that allows the observer to merge the two images into a single, three-dimensional perception (Fig.19.3). The stereoscope typically contains lenses that direct each image to the corresponding eye, allowing the brain to fuse the images and per­ceive the three-dimensional structure of the optic disc.
19 Optic Disc Photography
Fig. 19.2 Color fundus (left) and red-free (right) monoscopic photographs of the right eye with inferior and superior retinal nerve ber layer defects; the defects are more clearly visible in the red-free photographs (yellow arrows)
227
server agreement than monoscopic assessments. Parkin etal. [7] and Varma etal. [5] have evaluated the intraobserver and interobserver agreement for evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma under mono­scopic and stereoscopic conditions; the agreement was similar under both conditions, Yang et al. [8] have reported better performance with stereoscopic images among general ophthalmologists.
Fig. 19.3 Examining the stereoscopic optic disc photo­graphs with a stereoscope
Clinical application: With these stereoscopic images, clinicians gain a better understanding of features of cup-to-disc ratio, neuroretinal rim abnormalities, and other structural changes for better diagnosis and management of glaucoma. However, stereoscopic optic disc imaging may provide higher estimates of the cup-disc ratio and lower estimates of the neuroretinal rim area [5].
Morgan etal. [6] compared monoscopic and ste­reoscopic images of the optic disc using software for the digital stereoscopic analysis of optic disc ste­reo pairs and found that digital stereoscopic optic disc assessment provides higher levels of interob-
19.4 Retinal Camera forOptic Disc Photography
19.4.1 Non-mydriatic Fundus Cameras
Non-mydriatic fundus cameras are designed to capture high-resolution images of the fundus, including the optic disc, without pupil dilation. They combine optical elements to capture clear and detailed images of the fundus. These optical components typically include lenses, mirrors, and lters. The lenses focus the light onto the retina, and the mirrors are used to direct the light to form the image. Filters enhance contrast and selectively capture specic wavelengths of light. Non-mydriatic fundus cameras employ pupil detection and alignment systems to ensure accu-
228
rate and centered imaging. Infrared light is com­monly used as it causes less discomfort for the patient and allows better visualization of fundus structures. The camera’s software then adjusts the focus and alignment to capture the desired region, typically the optic disc, with high preci­sion and clarity. By eliminating the need for pupil dilatation, these cameras provide a more conve­nient and patient-friendly approach to fundus imaging without compromising the quality of the image [9].
K. G. Pratinya et al.
19.4.2 Handheld Fundus Cameras
Handheld fundus cameras are portable and com­pact imaging devices used to capture an image of the optic disc and retina. These are light­weight, compact, and portable, allowing effort­less maneuverability and use in various clinical settings. They typically consist of a camera unit, an imaging module, a light source, a display screen, and controls for image capture and adjustment. Handheld fundus cameras offer var­ious methods for image capture. They may have a built-in camera module or use attachments that can be connected to smartphones or other mobile devices. Some cameras feature a live­view display that shows real-time images as the operator aligns the camera with the patient’s eye. Images can be captured with a hand-oper­ated button or by activating a foot pedal. The image quality may be variable due to operator variability. Additionally, the eld of view may be narrower than larger cameras, requiring mul­tiple images to obtain an image of the entire fundus. However, they address the growing demand for retinal imaging in different clinical scenarios like those for screening children, school screenings, and screening of bed-ridden patients [10]. Integrating smartphone technol­ogy and miniature tabletop versions make these cameras increasingly portable, convenient, and accessible (Fig.19.4).
Fig. 19.4 Fundus photography in a school screening using a handheld non-mydriatic smartphone-integrated fundus camera (Remidio, Bangalore, India)
19.5 Technology Assessment
Bak etal. [11] compared the RNFL defect mea­surements obtained from red-free fundus photog­raphy and optical coherence tomography (OCT) en face imaging vis-à-vis the functional outcomes in terms of mean and pattern standard deviation. They reported that the en face RNFL defect showed a higher correlation with the severity of visual eld loss than the red-free RNFL defect. Watanabe et al. [12] evaluated the accuracy of glaucoma screening using fundus photography combined with OCT.They found that the diag­nostic accuracy of glaucoma screening signi­cantly increased when the OCT was added to the fundus imaging.
19.6 Deep Learning-Based Enhanced Optic Disc Photography
This refers to the applications of articial intelli­gence (AI) techniques, specically deep learning algorithms, to improve the quality and interpretation of optic disc photographs. These
bd
19 Optic Disc Photography
229
a
c
Fig. 19.5 Color fundus photograph and articial intelligence showing the segmentation of the optic disc boundary of the right eye (a and b) and the left eye (c and d) (original photograph)
algorithms are trained on large datasets of anno­tated images to learn patterns and features that aid in image enhancement, segmentation, and analysis. These algorithms can extract features from images and perform complex tasks, such as enhancing image quality, sharpness, contrast, and clarity without relying on explicit instructions, and identify and correct common image artifacts, such as noise, blurriness, and uneven illumina­tion. These can be trained to automatically seg­ment the optic disc region and accurately delineate the borders, enabling precise measure­ments (Fig.19.5).
Over the years, optic disc image analysis has witnessed signicant advancements (Table19.1), beginning with early studies in the early 2000s involving regression analysis and machine learn­ing techniques. Subsequent developments focused on applying AI frameworks for optic disc segmen­tation, enabling accurate estimation of parameters such as vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) and RNFL analysis. More recently, deep learning algorithms have been employed for automated abnormality detection, enabling the identication of glaucoma-related features and providing valu­able insights for clinical decision-making.