Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_103_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
44 Мб
Скачать
3 Retinoscopy
Fig. 3.6 Reex and intercept
33
Intercept
Reflex
ab c
Fig. 3.7 Images captured from a retinoscopy video dem­onstrate the intercept and reex moving in the same direc­tion when the streak is moved from the patient’s right to their left side. (a) The intercept and reex are both seen on the right side of the Purkinje image. (b, c) Show the change in position of reex as intercept moves toward
Purkinje
image
patient’s left. Both intercept and reex are in the same direction, left of the Purkinje image. A “with” reex is neutralized with a plus spherical lens. It indicates hyper­metropia, or myopia of power less than the working dis­tance equivalent
abc
Fig. 3.8 The above images illustrate the “against” move­ment of the reex, this time with a horizontal streak mov­ing downwards. In the rst image (a), the reex can be seen at the lower edge of the pupil. The reex moves up as the light beam (intercept) moves down in the third image (c). The reex has moved in the opposite direction—this
is known as “against reex.” Panel (b) shows the reex in the center of the pupil when the intercept is in the mid­position vertically. The “against” reex indicates myopia, and the endpoint of retinoscopy is achieved by placing the appropriate concave lenses
34
ab
D. K. Bagga and J. M. Woodhouse
minus meridian is neutralized rst. If the exam­iner prefers to work with a minus cylinder, the most plus/least minus meridian is rst neutralized.
3.5.4 Alignment
The best alignment would be refracting along the patient’s visual axis. Therefore, the examiner checks for the rst Purkinje image while the patient is asked to look toward the distance tar­get. If this image is in the center of the pupil, it indicates good alignment (Fig.3.9).
Note that the Purkinje image cannot be con­sidered for reference in patients with eccentric viewing, such as patients with Stargardt’s disease or macular degeneration. In these cases, the examiner should refract in the patient’s adapted viewing position.
The patient usually has both eyes open during retinoscopy, but in the case of strabismus, it may be necessary to cover the xing eye to ensure the deviated eye takes up xation and is aligned. Otherwise, refracting patients with both eyes open may assist the examiner in maintaining good alignment. The patient’s right eye should be refracted using the examiner’s right eye and vice versa to avoid parallax errors.
3.5.5 Controlling Accommodation
In conventional or “static” retinoscopy, the patient xates on a target at a distance (6m or 20ft), thus encouraging relaxed accommodation. To minimize accommodation, the xation target should be large (e.g., a 6/60 letter or picture for children). Relaxed accommodation can be fur­ther encouraged by “fogging” (blurring with plus/+ve lenses) the eye not under the test. For young hypermetropes with active accommoda­tion, it may be useful to fog with a plus lens that is 2.00 D greater than their previous prescription.
Other forms of retinoscopy, including cyclo­plegic and Mohindra, will be discussed later (Sect. 3.8.1). These techniques control accom­modation by different means, but the underlying principles of retinoscopy remain the same.
3.5.6 Ambient Light
Retinoscopy is a darkroom procedure. Reducing the ambient light helps by increasing the patient’s pupil size and relaxing the accommodation. In addition, the dark room improves the examiner’s ability to perceive the reex by enhancing the contrast.
Good alignment Ö
Fig. 3.9 Images reecting (a) good and (b) poor align- ment based on the location of the Purkinje image observed during retinoscopy. The examiner can change their posi-
Poor alignment X
Purkinje
image
Purkinje
image
tion vertically and horizontally to ensure appropriate alignment during the retinoscopy
3 Retinoscopy
Table 3.2 Centimeters to D conversion scale
Working lens power in diopter (D) 33.33 20 10 5 2.5 2 1.25 1 Test distance in cm 3 5 10 20 40 60 80 100
35
3.5.7 Use ofBrightness Controls
The rheostat of a streak retinoscope helps control the brightness of the light beam. An appropriate brightness level provides adequate visibility of reex for the examiner without causing glare for the patient. There are a few ocular conditions where patients may experience signicant intol­erance to light, such as achromatopsia, congeni­tal glaucoma, or aniridia. In these cases, if the media (cornea, lens, and vitreous) are clear and the examiner can observe at a low brightness level, the brightness can be adjusted to a level the patient can tolerate. In contrast, in some cases with media opacication, using the maximum brightness may help visualize the characteristics of the reex.
3.5.8 Working Distance andSpherical Errors inRetinoscopy
Table 3.2 shows the centimeters (cm) to diopter (D) conversion scale and represents the test dis­tance and corresponding working lens correction. It shows that the examiner must be precise about their working distance correction for shorter test distances. This is because even a small change at a shorter working distance accounts for a large dioptric change. For a working distance of 50cm or longer, a minor incorrect estimation of the working distance may not make a clinically sig­nicant error (over 0.25 D). The other advantage of using a longer working distance is to encour­age the patient to relax their accommodation, as some patients might intermittently look at the retinoscope’s light or the examiner’s face. A shorter working distance will stimulate proximal accommodation, adding inaccuracies in measur­ing the refractive errors.
While there are advantages to using longer
working distances (50 cm), there are special
situations, such as a miotic pupil or media opac­ity, where the examiner may need to use a shorter test distance.
3.6 Estimation ofRefractive Errors
At the outset of retinoscopy, estimating the approximate refractive error is very useful so that the rst lens inserted brings the reex close to the endpoint.
3.6.1 When theObservation Is an“Against” Movement oftheReex
As the far point in a myopic eye is within a nite distance, it is easy to estimate the magnitude of myopia. Simply reduce the test distance to observe the rst noticeable “with” and then move back to the rst noticeable “against”; between these two points lies the far point. Estimate the distance between the point of reversal and the patient’s eye and convert it to D.For example, if the point of reversal was observed at 20cm, the person would have 5.00 D myopia.
3.6.2 When theObservation Is a“with” Movement oftheReex
The “enhancement” technique helps estimate the strength of the “with” reex up to about 5 D [1]. The examiner slowly moves the sleeve position to vary positive vergence and achieve an enhanced reex (thinnest, sharpest, and brightest) while remaining in the plane mirror effect of retinos­copy (i.e., not reversing the movement). If the examiner needs to apply the maximum positive vergence (moving the sleeve upwards to its fur-
36
ab
D. K. Bagga and J. M. Woodhouse
thest) possible in the plane mirror effect to enhance the reex, it represents +5.00 D or more.
3.6.3 Estimating andConrming theAxis ofAstigmatic Error
If the sleeve at the bottom-most position itself provides the enhanced reex, then it means about +0.5 D.For estimating the magnitude of hyper­metropia for the complete range between +0.5 D and +5.0 D, the examiner needs to consider the beam width that produces the enhanced reex and interpret it in relation to the difference between the two extreme sleeve positions. Figure 3.10 demonstrates how the width of the beam (intercept) guides the estimate of the mag­nitude of hypermetropia.
Three commonly used techniques for estimating the axis of astigmatic error are (1) thickness, (2) break, and (3) skew phenomena [1].
Thickness phenomena: The examiner must observe the change in the thickness of the reex when observing the reex across different merid­ians. The direction providing the thinnest, bright­est, and sharpest reex is the axis for the plus cylinder (Fig.3.11). The thickness phenomenon is best observed when refracting the eye using
ab cde
Fig. 3.10 The above gures illustrate the change in thickness, brightness, and sharpness of the reex as the sleeve is moved up {Panel (a) (sleeve at the bottom most position) to panel (e) (sleeve position upwards with maxi­mum convergence, in plane mirror)}. This change in
sleeve position causes a change in the vergence of the rays entering the eye. In the enhancement technique, hyperme­tropia is estimated by the width of the intercept that pro­duces enhanced reex (thinnest, brightest, and sharpest). Panel (d) is an enhanced reex, and the estimate for this case will be +3.50 D
Fig. 3.11 Thickness phenomenon: Panel (a) illustrates a thicker reex than panel (b), as the streak is not aligned to the correct axis in panel (a)
3 Retinoscopy
37
plus cylinders, as it would be most readily visual­ized using the enhancement technique described above (Sect. 3.6.2). If the examiner wishes to use minus cylinders, the method can be used with the sleeve at its highest, thus reversing the reex to “with” and moving it downwards to enhance the reex.
Break phenomena: The examiner observes the direction of the reex in relation to the direc­tion of the intercept. In astigmatic errors, a break will be observed as an angle between the inter­cept (the light beam of streak) and reex when the intercept is not aligned with one of the princi­pal meridians of astigmatism (Fig.3.12).
Skew phenomenon: A skew phenomenon is observed in the dynamic movement of the reex in relation to the direction of the light beam of a streak (the intercept). When the intercept is off­axis/not aligned to the principal meridians of astigmatic error, the intercept and reex move in different directions, called the skewing phenom­ena. Therefore, the axis of the cylindrical lens will be in a direction in which the reex and intercept move in the same direction.
The straddling technique allows the exam- iner to conrm the cylindrical axis once a cylin­drical lens is placed in the trial frame. First, a correcting cylindrical lens is placed in the trial frame based on the estimations obtained using the thickness, break, and skewing phenomena. If the estimated axis is incorrect, an orientation difference (break and skew) between the three components: the retinoscope streak (intercept), cylindrical lens markings, and reex will be observed. This difference can be best visualized at 45° away from the axis of the cylindrical lens placed in the trial frame (Fig.3.13). The orienta­tion of the axis must be adjusted until all three align [1]. When the orientation of the axis is correct, straddling will show similar character­istics (thickness, brightness, and movement) of reex at 45° to either side. If not, these charac­teristics will differ, as shown in Fig. 3.13. Particularly for the movement of the reex, one side of the straddle could show a “with” reex while on the other side, an “against” movement can be observed.
ab c
Fig. 3.12 Demonstration of the break phenomenon. There is a distinct angle, called the “break” between the intercept and the direction of reex, in all three examples
(Fig.3.12a–c). The break will disappear if the streak in panel (c) is moved slightly to 85°, the true axis
38
ab
D. K. Bagga and J. M. Woodhouse
Fig. 3.13 Straddling technique: In Fig. (a), the axis of a convex cylindrical lens is placed at 95°. The observations at 140° (a) and 50° (b) reveal the difference in thickness,
3.6.4 Finalizing theMagnitude ofAstigmatism
When the reex movement has been neutralized with a cylindrical lens at the correct orientation, it is important to check the opposite (sphere) merid­ian again. It is all too easy for the examiner to inadvertently change the working distance
brightness, and movement of reex (not appreciated in a static picture), indicating the inaccurate placement of the astigmatic lens
slightly between neutralizing the sphere and moving on to correct astigmatism. When com­paring the movement of reex across all meridi­ans, it should move (or remain neutral) in the same way.
3.7 Tips forPerforming Retinoscopy (Table3.3)
3 Retinoscopy
Table 3.3 Tips for performing retinoscopy in complex conditions
Conditions posing challenges Recommendations
Nystagmus Keep the retinoscope still and allow the patient’s eye movements to replace the
retinoscope movements. Concentrate on observing the movement of reex to determine “with” or “against,” when the patient’s eye is directed in the appropriate direction
Media opacity Reduce the test distance, try dimming room lights further, and use the maximum
brightness of the retinoscope
Accommodation Contralateral (fellow eye) fogging. In the testing eye, begin with over plus lens to get
an “against” reex and reduce to neutral
Multiple reexes— different zones in the pupillary area showing different refractive errors
Central shadow Refract the immediate next zone to the shadow Miotic pupil Reduce working distance and room illumination Subluxated lens
(example: Marfan’s syndrome)
Reection from trial lenses
High refractive errors When the reex is close to neutral, it appears bright and has crisp movement. In
Focus on the central 2–3mm zone, close to the Purkinje image, and ignore the reexes seen in the periphery
Refract the zone closer to the Purkinje image; it may be possible to refract both aphakic and phakic zones. Later, improvement in the visual acuity should be assessed monocularly and binocularly to decide the spectacle prescription
Use of trial lenses with anti-reection coatings; in the case of planoconcave lenses, ip the lens with a concave surface facing the patient; this will reduce the size of the annoying reections
contrast, a reex far from the neutral is dim, wide, and slow. In high refractive errors, it can be challenging to determine the movement, and inexperienced examiner can sometimes assume neutrality because there is no apparent movement. Moving the retinoscope further and closer does not produce the “against” and “with” movements that conrm neutrality. If the reex is difcult to interpret, simply holding up a high-power plus and minus lens will quickly help since one will reveal a brighter reex, and the other will worsen matters
39
3.8 Special Techniques
3.8.1 Cycloplegic andMohindra Retinoscopy
Static retinoscopy, as described above, controls accommodation by asking the patient to xate on a distant target, fogging the fellow eye, etc. The static technique may be inappropriate for some patients, particularly young children or people with learning disabilities, who cannot reliably maintain xation at a distance.
Cycloplegic retinoscopy eliminates accom­modation by using cycloplegic eye drops that temporarily paralyze the ciliary muscles. Once the cycloplegic eye drops have taken effect, the patient can directly xate the retinoscope light, with the advantage that the refraction is now con-
ducted on the visual axis, and the examiner can use her/his preferred eye. The disadvantage (apart from patient discomfort and time for instillation and drug action) is that cycloplegic drugs also dilate the pupils, giving rise to aberrations and making the retinoscopy reex more challenging to interpret [4].
Mohindra retinoscopy uses the phenomenon known as “tonic accommodation” or “empty eld myopia” [4, 5]. It is conducted in total dark­ness apart from the retinoscopy light, which is dimmed as much as possible. Eyes in darkness adopt a stable, small amount of accommodation. The patient xates on the retinoscope light, and refraction is carried out as normal. However, occluding one eye is a recommended exception to cut out convergence cues that might trigger accommodation. The working distance allow-
40
ance is modied to allow for the small amount of accommodation the patient adopts in the dark [5]. According to research studies, [6] to obtain the same refraction as under cycloplegia and for a working distance of 50cm, the examiner should deduct 0.75 D for an infant under 2years, 1.00 D for a child aged 2 and over, and 1.25 D for a young adult. Unfortunately, there are no guide­lines for the age at which the examiner changes from child-appropriate to adult-appropriate deductions. Since the difference between the two is only 0.25 D, this is probably trivial. Mohindra has the advantages of being non-invasive and allowing other visual functions, such as accom­modation, to be assessed after refraction.
D. K. Bagga and J. M. Woodhouse
Fig. 3.14 A central shadow seen in the retinoscopy reex due to posterior subcapsular opacity in the lens
3.9 Additional Observations
The retinoscopy reex can provide additional information and indicate eye disorders causing a change in the pupil size, shape, color of reex, scissors/irregular reex, a shadow in reex, or invisible reex. Media opacities/disturbances (such as early keratoconus) can be much easier to spot with a retinoscope than with other means so that appropriate examinations can be carried out (Fig.3.14). Retinal disturbances, such as detach­ment and coloboma, can be seen in the different colorations of the retinoscopy reex, especially as the patient looks around. In patients with
severe disabilities, the ability to xate can be assessed with a retinoscope.
3.10 Comparison Between
Autorefraction andRetinoscopy
Both retinoscopy and autorefraction have their own merits and belong in a state-of-the-art eye examination room. Table 3.4 provides a quick comparison of the key parameters of both tech­niques to enable clinicians to determine when to use retinoscopy, autorefraction, or both.
3 Retinoscopy
Table 3.4 Comparing retinoscopy and autorefraction
Parameter Autorefraction Retinoscopy Cost of
equipment Cost of
refraction Accuracy Reasonably accurate ndings in most
Suitability In most cases, with normal pupil size and
Expensive Less expensive
Less expensive Expensive (considering the time taken to perform the
test)
Completely depends on the skills of the examiner cases, irrespective of the skills of the examiner
Suitable for all patients irrespective of age and abilities/ simple refractive errors. However, autorefraction may show an error in measuring complex refractions, such as high refractive errors, eyes with nystagmus, large eccentric xation, or miotic pupils Suitable for able-bodied, condent, and compliant patients
disabilities. Can be used in most of the complex cases of
high refractive errors, such as 20D of astigmatism or
50D of myopia, and a large variety of challenges;
application of estimation techniques, such as direct
retinoscopy or enhancement, and can provide a useful
starting point for subjective refraction
41
3.11 Conclusion
Retinoscopy is essential for all eye care profes­sionals involved in refractive correction. In cases where subjective refraction is not possible (for example, children and people with special needs), inconsistent or non-availability of autorefraction values (cases with uveal coloboma, aniridia, or irregular cornea), and high refractive errors where large variability may be observed in differ­ent methods, retinoscopy by an experienced eye care service provider can be the only way of determining the refractive correction. In addition to providing information about the refractive sta­tus, examiners can identify other ocular ndings, such as posterior subcapsular cataracts, vitreous opacities, and spherical aberrations. Retinoscopy has two major limitations: one, it is dependent on the skills of the professional; two, it could take a longer time to perform than an autorefractor­based examination. Despite these limitations, this is one of the important objective methods to mea­sure refractive errors in all, including the vulner­able and challenging cases.
Finally, reading about retinoscopy might
motivate the reader, but unless the reader prac-
tices the various techniques step by step and mul­tiple times, it may not help the reader and those waiting to get an appropriate refractive correc­tion. Therefore, practice is essential to improve refractive corrections to make the patient see clearly.
Funding Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation.
Disclosure None.
References
1. Corboy JM. The retinoscopy book: an introductory manual for eye care professionals. Slack Incorporated;
2003.
2. Bennett AG. An historical review of optometric principles and techniques. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1986;6(1):3–21.
3. Bennett A, Rabbetts R.Clinical visual optics, vol. 62. London: Butterworths; 1984. p.924.
4. Benjamin WJ. Borish’s clinical refraction-E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
5. Mohindra I. A technique for infant vision examina­tion. Optom Vis Sci. 1975;52(12):867–70.
6. Saunders KJ, Westall CA. Comparison between near retinoscopy and cycloplegic retinoscopy in the refraction of infants and children. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69(8):615–22.
Prescribing Spectacles
4
PremNandhiniSatgunam
4.1 Introduction
Vision is a collective process of optics, physiol­ogy, and visual perception at the higher centers of the brain. To achieve clear vision, all these pro­cesses must be intact. Imperfect optics, resulting in refractive error, can be alleviated through a pair of spectacles. However, all the processes that contribute collectively toward vision also deter­mine the nal spectacle prescription for a patient. As a result of this complex interplay and physio­logical variabilities, the same patient examined by the same examiner may end up with different spectacle prescriptions on two separate occa­sions. This variability must be kept in mind, espe­cially while changing earlier spectacles. Determining a spectacle prescription is a collab­orative effort, involving both the examiner and the patient. Truly, prescribing a pair of spectacles is both an art and a science. Science is learned, and art comes with practice. This chapter aims to give tips on both science and craft.
P. Satgunam (*) Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India e-mail: premnandhini@lvpei.org
4.2 Background
The procedure for prescribing spectacles is called subjective refraction. The “subjectivity” in this involves factors related to the patient (e.g., their tolerance of blur) and the examiner (e.g., their technique). Because of this subjectivity, specta­cles cannot be prescribed directly to a patient based solely on the autorefractor or the retino­scopic value. In a study that evaluated the patient’s tolerance to spectacles prescribed based on autorefraction and subjective refraction done by an optometrist, the latter was more tolerable [1]. Patient–clinician communication is impor­tant to dispense the appropriate spectacles. A sys­tematic review and meta-analysis found that about 16% of spectacles non-tolerance resulted from poor communication [2].
The rst step toward giving a spectacle pre-
scription, before subjective refraction, is good objective refraction. Readers can refer to Chap. 3 in this book for objective refraction. A list of good references [37] for prescribing spectacles is also put together at the end of this chapter. In addition, guidelines for spectacle prescription, especially for children (considering the risk of amblyopia), are also available from the websites of different professional organizations (including Ophthalmology and Optometry) [8, 9]. There are several tools and techniques that can be used for subjective refraction. Not all of these are described in this chapter. Only those techniques
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 T. Das, P. Satgunam (eds.), Ophthalmic Diagnostics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0138-4_4
43