Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_775_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
46 Мб
Скачать
Surgical Approach toPancreas, Liver, Biliary Physiologic Impairment
AlexandraW.Acher, AmirA.Rahnemai-Azar, SharonM.Weber, andTimothyM.Pawlik
5
Abstract
The multi-disciplinary management of hepato-pancreato­biliary diseases involves the treatment of both benign and malignant lesions. Benign liver lesions can be divided into non-infectious and infectious lesions. The most com­mon infectious lesions include abscesses, parasitic lesions, fungal lesions, and granulomatous diseases. The most common non-infectious primary benign liver lesions include simple hepatic cysts, hepatic hemangiomas, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatic adenoma, and biliary cystad­enoma. The most common liver malignancies include metastatic disease from a non-hepatic primary followed by hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarci­noma, and more rarely hepatic angiosarcoma. The treat­ment approach for liver malignancies should be rooted in a multidisciplinary collaboration between medical and radiation oncologists, interventional radiologists, pathol­ogists, and hepatobiliary surgeons. Critically important to treatment planning is the ability to contextualize the sur­gical and medical options relative to a patient’s disease burden, comorbidities, and underlying liver function. We herein review the pathophysiology and surgical manage­ment strategies of benign and malignant hepato- pancreato­biliary diseases.
A. W. Acher · S. M. Weber Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
A. A. Rahnemai-Azar Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, CA, USA
T. M. Pawlik ( Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA e-mail: tim.pawlik@osumc.edu
*)
5.1 Benign Liver Disease:
Pathophysiology andIndications forSurgical Treatment
Benign liver lesions can be divided into non-infectious and infectious lesions. The most common infectious lesions include abscesses (pyogenic, amebic abscess), parasitic lesions (Echinococcus Granulosa or Hydatid cyst, Echinococcus Multilocularis, Schistosomiasis), fungal lesions (Candidiasis, Cryptococcus), and granulomatous dis­eases (Tuberculosis, Histoplasmosis) [1]. Depending on eti­ology and symptoms, the treatment of infectious lesions largely involves medical therapy, sometimes aided by percu­taneous drainage, and only rarely surgical intervention [1]. This review therefore focuses on non-infectious lesion pathophysiology and surgical management strategies. The most common non-infectious primary benign liver lesions include simple hepatic cysts, hepatic hemangiomas, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatic adenoma, and biliary cystadenoma.

5.1.1 Hemangioma

Hepatic hemangiomas are benign hepatic artery supplied vascular lesions that can contain thick brous septations and internal thromboses [2, 3]. Hepatic hemangiomas can be solitary or multifocal and range in size from a few millime­ters to >20 cm in diameter. Although hemangiomas have been observed to grow in pregnancy and estrogen supple­mentation, targeted investigation has not demonstrated any association between estrogen-enhanced states and hemangi­oma incidence or growth [4, 5]. Hemangiomas are hypothe­sized to result from dysregulated congenital intrahepatic angiogenesis and although they rarely increase in size, enlargement occurs secondary to ectasia or dilation of the vessels rather than vessel hypertrophy or proliferation [2, 3].
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022 M. Makuuchi et al. (eds.), The IASGO Textbook of Multi-Disciplinary Management of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Diseases,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0063-1_5
31
32
ab
cd
A. W. Acher et al.
Although hemangiomas are highly vascular lesions, the risk of spontaneous hemorrhage or rupture is very low due to the thick walls and internal septations; the majority remain asymptomatic over time [2, 3].
Management should be guided by the degree to which symptoms affect a patient’s quality of life. Thorough evalua­tion should rule out other symptom etiology. There is no indication for surgical intervention or regular surveillance in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic lesions. Signicantly symptomatic lesions in healthy surgical candi­dates can be managed with either laparoscopic or open tumor enucleation, wedge resection, or formal liver resection depending on the tumor size and location. Giant hemangio­mas and diffuse multifocal hepatic hemangiomatosis have also been treated with liver transplantation, although the data are limited to a few case reports [6]. In patients with symp-
tomatic lesions who are not surgical candidates, radiotherapy and arterial embolization can be offered, although both have transient response and should only be considered as pallia­tive treatments to improve quality of life [79].

5.1.2 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia (FNH) arises from hepatocyte and cholangiocyte hyper-proliferation that represents a local cellular response to congenital arteriovenous malformation [4]. Although FNH lesions can be estrogen receptor positive, estrogen-enhanced states (pregnancy or estrogen use) do not increase the frequency or size of FNH lesions [10]. On axial imaging, FNH often present with a central stellate scar but this pathopneumonic characteristics can be absent (Fig.5.1)
Fig. 5.1 Stellate scar in association with focal nodular hyperplasia. In-
(a) and opposed-phase (b) GRE T1-WI, fat-suppressed FSE T2-WI (c), pre (d) and post hepatocyte-specic contrast agent (Eovist pressed 3D-GRE T1-WI at the arterial (e), portal venous (f), interstitial (g) and hepatobiliary (h) phases. There is a lesion on the left hepatic lobe (white arrow, a–h), showing isointense signal comparing to the surrounding liver on non-contrast T1-WI (a, b and d) and on T2-WI (c). The lesion also shows a central scar (black arrow, a–h), which is hypointense on T1-WI (a, b and d) and hyperintense on T2-WI (c). The lesion demonstrates homogeneous enhancement on early post-contrast
®
) fat-sup-
images (e), becoming isointense to the underlying liver parenchyma (f and g). The progressive enhancement of the central scar is depicted on the delayed post-contrast images (g). On the hepatobiliary phase, 20min after the administration the hepatocyte-specic contrast agent, the lesion shows uptake of the contrast agent, becoming minimally hyperintense comparing to the surrounding liver parenchyma. Since the central scar has no hepatocytes, there is no uptake of the contrast agent, becoming hypointense comparing to the liver and to the rest of the lesion. GRE Gradient-echo, FSE Fast spinecho, T1-WI T1-weighted images
ef
gh
5 Surgical Approach to Pancreas, Liver, Biliary Physiologic Impairment
33
Fig. 5.1 (contnued)
[4]. Interestingly, the formation of the stellate scar is second­ary to oxidative stress caused by an over-abundance of oxy­genated blood inherent in the arteriovenous malformation, which activates stellate cells, the primary drivers of liver brosis [11].
Due to their benign, largely asymptomatic and non­progressive nature, management of FNH is observation­based with surgery rarely being indicated.
Management options include observation, aspiration with or without sclerotherapy, cyst fenestration, or surgical resec­tion [14, 15]. Aspiration (+/ sclerotherapy) has a high rate of recurrence and has largely been replaced by cyst fenestra­tion in patients t for surgery [14]. Although rare, hepatic cystadenoma (discussed subsequently) can appear indistin­guishable from a simple hepatic cyst on axial imaging, but cystadenomas require resection due to associated risk of invasive cancer [16]. Cyst fenestration is therefore the deni­tive treatment for large peripheral or symptomatic cysts, as it

5.1.3 Simple Hepatic Cyst

allows for intraoperative biopsy/cytology and the ability to adjust the surgical plan if cystadenoma or cystadenocarci-
Simple cysts are thin walled and lined by cuboidal epithe­lium that can contain septa. Simple hepatic cyst size can range from <1cm to more than 20 cm in diameter, and are rarely symptomatic [12]. Simple cysts are thought to form congenitally when intrahepatic ductules fail to merge with the developing contiguous biliary system; over time, these cysts can dilate and ll with yellow serous uid secondary to epithelial cyst wall secretion of uid [12, 13].
noma is discovered. Cyst fenestration can be done safely with either a laparoscopic or open approach. Laparoscopic cyst fenestration has equivalent recurrence rates and less perioperative morbidity than an open approach, however, depending on the location of the cyst, an open approach may facilitate a more complete fenestration [1719]. An open approach may also be preferred in the setting of a recurrent cyst.
34
A. W. Acher et al.

5.1.4 Hepatic Adenoma

Hepatic adenomas are rare, soft, well-demarcated, hepatocyte- based tumors supplied by hepatic artery-derived arterioles, and occur as solitary or multifocal lesions. Hepatic adenomas are largely considered as benign lesions, yet can have malignant potential [20]. Solitary adenomas are associ­ated with female gender, oral contraceptive use, obesity, alcohol use, and anabolic steroids [20, 21]. In contrast, hepatic adenomatosis (>10 lesions) can occur in association with glycogen storage diseases [20, 22]. Adenoma rupture and hemorrhage occurs in up to 20% of lesions and is associ­ated with increasing tumor size (>4–5 cm), exophytic and peripheral tumor location, left lateral sector tumor location, and prominent supplying arteries on axial imaging [23]. The overall rate of malignant transformation is around 4% and is only associated with certain subtypes [24, 25]. Although hepatic adenomas are difcult to distinguish from FNH and hepatocellular carcinoma on routine imaging modalities, the use of gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI has increased diagnos­tic sensitivity from 50% to 96%, enabling more accurate risk stratication of these tumors [26, 27]. Small lesions (<2cm) remain difcult, however, to distinguish; in turn, biopsy may be benecial in some patients [28]. The clinical benet of biopsy has increased with mutation-based subtyping of hepatic adenomas given that each subtype has varying degrees of malignant potential [28].
The most common hepatic adenoma subtype is associated with a mutation in TCF1, the gene responsible for hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 alpha (HNF-1a), a transcription factor involved in hepatic cell homeostasis, metabolism, and cell differentiation. This mutation inactivates HNF-1a, leading to non-regulated cell differentiation [25, 29]. HNF-1a subtype adenomas exhibit steatosis and have a frequency of malig­nant transformation of 7% [25, 30]. A second subtype results from an activation mutation in CTNNB1 gene that encodes beta-catenin, a transcriptional co-regulator protein that, when aberrantly activated, promotes the transcription of c-Myc and CycinD-1 oncogenes [25, 30, 31]. B-catenin sub­type adenomas have pseudo-glandular cells with some cyto­logical abnormalities and have a frequency of malignant transformation of 46% [25, 30]. A third subtype is associated with mutations in various oncogenes leading to uncontrolled activation of the IL-6 inammatory pathway. Inammatory hepatic adenomas are dened by inammatory inltrates and dystrophic vessels and have not demonstrated malignant potential [25, 30]. A fourth subtype, referred to as the unclas­sied subtype, is not associated with mutations or inamma­tion. The unclassied subtype does not have any marked steatosis, cytological abnormality, or inammatory inltra­tion but is composed of stacked hepatocytes and has a 13%
frequency of malignant transformation [25, 30]. A nal sub­type, referred to as the sonic hedgehog subtype, results from activation of the sonic hedgehog pathway that is involved in lipid metabolism and liver regeneration. This subtype is associated with obesity and while it does not have increased malignant potential, it is associated with a high risk of hem­orrhage [25]. Independent of subtype, male gender and tumor size (> 5cm) are associated with an increased risk of malignant transformation [32, 33].
Given the diversity of subtype and presentation, manage­ment strategies for hepatic adenomas must weigh patient sex and comorbidities, exogenous estrogen or androgen expo­sure, the genetic subtype, tumor size and the risks inherent in surgery. Given the increased risk of malignancy in male patients, discontinuation of androgen therapy and surgical resection is recommended as rst line treatment [24, 25, 34]. For female patients with tumors <5cm, initial conservative management may include discontinuation of any exogenous estrogen or androgen therapy, weight loss, and 6–12months of surveillance imaging [34]. Tumor regression can occur in up to 79% of patients after discontinuation of OCPs [35]. In female patients with tumor progression after hormone cessa­tion or with tumors >5cm, surgical resection is the recom­mended rst line treatment [34]. Microwave ablation is an alternative to surgical resection [36, 37]. With better under­standing of malignant potential of certain hepatic adenoma subtypes, many clinicians advocate for surgical resection of B-catenin subtype tumors regardless of their size while inammatory subtype or HFN1a subtype can be managed more conservatively [25, 34].
In the event that a patient presents with adenoma rupture and hemorrhage, transarterial embolization (TAE) of sup­plying vessels may be performed. Most patients who have continued bleeding will eventually tamponade the site of adenoma rupture and stabilize. The rate of complete tumor regression associated with TAE is 10% while partial regres­sion can approach 75% [38]. However, eventual surgical resection is often necessary for denitive management [38].
5.1.5 Biliary Cystadenoma andthePotential
forCystadenocarcinoma
Biliary cystadenomas are rare multi-loculated cystic tumors composed of biliary columnar epithelial cells. Interestingly, spindle and ovarian stromal cells can also be present, which may offer insight into an otherwise obscure etiology [39]. These lesions are mostly associated with the intrahepatic biliary system and have a predominance in the left liver [39]. Biliary cystadenomas are slow growing lesions, which vary in size, and can be radiologically difcult to distinguish from
5 Surgical Approach to Pancreas, Liver, Biliary Physiologic Impairment
35
simple hepatic cysts or biliary cystadenocarcinoma [39]. On nal pathology, 10% of cystadenomas are found to have transformed to biliary cystadenocarcinoma [39].
Historically, the management options of cystadenoma varied from fenestration and wedge resection to formal hepa­tectomy. However, the current standard of care is to perform cyst enucleation or formal hepatic resection to mitigate the risk of recurrent disease and cystadenocarcinoma [40]. The rate of cystadenoma recurrence is 49% in cyst fenestrations versus 15% in partial hepatectomies/enucleations and 10% in formal hepatectomies [39]. Other factors associated with an increased risk of recurrence include an R1/R2 resection and the presence of ovarian stromal and spindle cells (pres­ent in up to 90% of biliary cystadenomas) [39]. If biliary cystadenocarcinoma is noted on nal pathology, a formal hepatectomy may be considered as long as it is compatible with patient comorbidities, cyst location, and the future liver remnant (FLR). This is an especially relevant point as preop­erative distinction of biliary cystadenoma from cystadeno­carcinoma is limited by poor sensitivity (80%) and specicity (21%) using axial imaging modalities (CT or MRI) [39]. Surgeons who advocate for partial hepatectomy or cystade­noma enucleation should counsel patients that a formal hep­atectomy may be required if cystadenocarcinoma is found on nal pathology.
5.2 Malignant Liver Disease:
Pathophysiology andIndications forSurgical Treatment
The most common liver malignancies include metastatic dis­ease from a non-hepatic primary followed by hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and more rarely hepatic angiosarcoma. The treatment approach for liver malignancies should be rooted in a multidisciplinary collaboration between medical and radiation oncologists, interventional radiologists, pathologists, and hepatobiliary surgeons. Critically important to treatment planning is the ability to contextualize the surgical and medical options rela­tive to a patient’s disease burden, comorbidities, underlying liver function, and FLR.Typically, the FLR should be >20% for patients with normal liver, 30% for patients with bro­sis or steatosis, and40% for patients with cirrhosis [41]. The extent of resection, however, should also be assessed relative to patient age, functional status, and response to any neoadjuvant therapy exposure as these factors have been shown to inuence post-hepatectomy outcome [41, 42]. Liver function can be assessed by the Child-Pugh scoring system or the Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system [43, 44].

5.2.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary hepatic malignancy. Its incidence varies with geographic region, with a higher incidence in areas with endemic hepatitis B infection (i.e. sub-Saharan Africa, Eastern Asia, Mediterranean countries) [45]. Globally, the average 5-year cumulative risk of developing HCC is 0.1–0.3% in inactive HBV carriers, 0.6–2.4% in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), and 10–15% in patients with chronic HBV and cirrhosis [46]. However, this risk is higher in areas with endemic HBV [46]. Other conditions that predispose to developing HCC include chronic hepatitis C infection with cirrhosis (the most common etiology in North and South America), alcohol liver disease with cirrhosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, toxin exposure (aatoxin, polyvinyl chlo­ride, carbon chlorides), and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with cirrhosis [45]. The common denominator underlying all these conditions is a state of chronic intrahepatic inamma­tion (largely mediated through IL-6 inammatory pathway), which is thought to promote dysplasia and malignant trans­formation of hepatocytes [45]. Additionally, there is likely a synergistic and oncogenic relationship between underlying inammation and genetic mutations that compound the risk of HCC [47]. Examples of the most common hepatocarcino­genic gene mutations include those in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter gene, CTNNB1 that encodes B-catenin, and TP53 that encodes the tumor suppressor pro­tein p53 [47, 48].
Treatment of HCC is complex and requires a multidisci­plinary approach with input from medical and radiation oncology, interventional radiology, pathologists, and hepato­biliary surgeons. Assessment of liver function and staging of disease are crucial to the preoperative work up and have very signicant prognostic implications that should be weighed against the risks of surgery and the patient’s goals. Liver function should be assessed by the Child-Pugh or the Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is one of the most commonly used tools to guide treatment strategy by a summative assessment of tumor stage, liver function, and patient functional status and includes estimated prognosis of each treatment approach (Fig.5.2) [49]. In gen­eral, very early stage and early stage HCC can be considered for tumor ablation, oncologic resection, or transplantation. According to institutional practice, the Milan or San Francisco Criteria may be used to guide transplant candidacy based on the number and size of tumors (Table 5.1) [50]. BCLC intermediate stage are recommended to undergo che­moembolization while patients with advanced stages can be enrolled in systemic therapy clinical trials [49]. Although
36
BCLC Staging and treatment schedule
A. W. Acher et al.
HCC
Stage 0
PST 0, Child-Pugh A
Very early stage (0)
Single<2cm
Carcinoma in situ
Single
Portal pressure/ bilirubin
Normal
Resection
Fig. 5.2 Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classication and treatment schedule. PST performance status; CLT/LDLT cadaver liver
transplant/living donor liver transplant; RF/PEI radiofrequency ablation/percutaneous ethanol injection; TACE transarterial chemoembolization
Table 5.1 Milan and San Francisco criteria for liver transplantation in
the setting of hepatocellular carcinoma
Milan Criteria San Francisco Criteria Single tumor <5cm
OR 1–3 tumors, each <3cm
Single or 3 nodules < 3cm, PS 0
Increased
Curative Treatments (30%)
5-yr survival : 50-70%
Early stage (A)
No Ye s
Liver Transplantation
(CLT / LDLT )
Single tumor <6.5cm OR 1–3 tumors, each <4.5cm OR Total combined tumor diameter<8cm
Okuda 1-2, PST 0-2, Child-Pugh A-B
3 noudles <3cm
Associated diseases
PEI/RF Chemoembolization
Stage A-C
Intermediate stage (B)
Multinodular, PS 0
Randomized controlled trials (50%)
3yr survival: 20-40%
breast, skin, and lung cancers [51]. The most common indi­cation for hepatic metastectomy is for colorectal liver metas­tases. In surgically-t patients with colorectal liver metastasis, complete oncologic resection of metastases is associated with a survival benet [5259]. Appropriately selected patients with hepatic metastases from primary pan­creas or gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors may also
Okuda 3, PST >2, Child-Pugh C
Advanced stage (C)
Portal invasion, Na, M1, PS 1-2
Portal invasion, N1, M1
New
Agents
Stage D
Te rminal
stage (D)
Symptomatic Itc (20%)
1yr survival: 10-20%
benet from metastectomy [60]. The data supporting hepatic
some patients with BCLC intermediate stage HCC may also be candidates for resection. Among surgical candidates, por­tal vein embolization can be used to induce contralateral
resection of other metastatic lesions from a primary breast cancer, etc. are evolving; in turn, hepatectomy can be consid­ered for appropriately selected patients [61].
liver hypertrophy prior to oncologic resection. Internal radia­tion therapy with Yttrium-90 can be used to treat the primary tumor as well as induce contralateral hypertrophy in support

5.2.3 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

of eventual curative intent oncologic resection. Despite these treatment strategies, the 3year survival for intermediate and advanced stage HCC is 20–40% [49].
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is rare and arises from malignant transformation of cholangiocytes lining the intrahepatic biliary tree (Fig.5.3) [62]. Although biliary in nature, ICC is considered a primary liver cancer [62].

5.2.2 Metastatic Disease

Primary sclerosing cholangitis, choledochal cyst disease, chronic hepatitis B or C infection, cirrhosis, fatty liver dis-
The liver is a common site of metastatic spread for multiple primary cancers. The majority of hepatic metastases origi­nate from the gastrointestinal tract (70–75%) with nearly 50% originating from the colon or rectum [51]. However, other common origins include stomach, pancreas, biliary,
ease, toxin exposure (asbestos), parasitic infection, obesity, and diabetes are associated with increased risk of ICC devel­opment [63]. Similar to HCC, ICC is thought to result from a synergistic relationship between chronic inammation and genetic aberrancies. Associated mutations include: KRAS
bc
ype IIIb
5 Surgical Approach to Pancreas, Liver, Biliary Physiologic Impairment
37
Fig. 5.3 Anatomic
classication of cholangiocarcinoma. “a: The classication of cholangiocarcinoma can be based on anatomic location, intrahepatic, hilar or extrahepatic; b: Non-hilar lesions can be described as mass-like, periductal or intraductal; c: Bismuth classication for hilar lesions.” Type I cholangiocarcinoma involves the common hepatic duct only; Type II cholangiocarcinoma involves the common hepatic duct and the conuence of the right and left hepatic ducts; Type IIIa and IIIb cholangiocarcinoma includes the common hepatic duct and either the right or left hepatic duct, respectively; and Type IV cholangiocarcinoma involves the biliary conuence and extends to both right and left hepatic ducts or refers to multifocal sites
a
Mass-like
Periductal
Intraductal
Intrahepatic
Hilar
Extrahepatic
Right hepatic
duct
Cystic duct
Distal common
bile duct
Left hepatic
Common
hepatic duct
Type I
Type IIIa
duct
Type II
T
gene which encodes K-Ras signaling protein of the RAS/ MAPK pathway crucial to cell proliferation and differentia­tion; TP53 which encodes tumor suppressor protein, P53; IDH1 gene which encodes isocitrate dehydrogenase, an enzyme critical for NADPH-dependent cellular metabolism and sequestration of reactive oxygen species [64]. Other cell signaling pathways, including Hedgehog (previously refer­enced relation to hepatic adenoma subtypes) and WNT/B- ­catenin (previously referenced in relation to hepatic adenoma subtype malignant potential and HCC) are also altered [64]. As in HCC, IL-6 likely has a large role in linking a chronic inammatory state and genetic alterations to facilitate malig­nant transformation of cholangiocytes [64].
Surgical resection provides the only option for potential cure in patients with ICC.Unfortunately, most patients pres­ent with advanced disease not amenable to curative resec­tion. Contraindications to resection include extrahepatic disease, multiple bilobar or multicentric tumors, and lymph node metastases [65]. As in HCC, as markers of tumor biol­ogy are discovered, tumor biology may play an increasing role in helping to identify patients with the most potential to benet from surgery; these advancements will undoubtedly change the surgical landscape for this disease [66].
Type IV Type IV

5.2.4 Hepatic Angiosarcoma

Hepatic Angiosarcoma is a rare but aggressive vascular tumor that can present as a solitary lesion with satellite lesions or a diffuse inltrative mass. These tumors are formed from malignant transformation of vascular endothelial cells and are prone to hemorrhage. The pathogenesis of these tumors is unclear, however, 25% may result from hemochro­matosis or previous exposure to thorium dioxide, arsenic based insecticides, or vinyl chlorides [67]. Most patients present with metastatic disease and die within 6months of presentation; unfortunately, even for patients who do undergo treatment, 3year survival is only 3% [67].
Liver transplantation and liver resection have both been utilized as potential treatment options, however, liver trans­plantation has been redacted given the high rate of recur­rence and mortality. Liver resection can be offered to patients with early stage disease, however, recurrence is exceedingly likely. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization has also been employed as a palliative measure in patients who pres­ent with hemorrahge [67].
38
A. W. Acher et al.
5.3 Benign Biliary Disease: Pathophysiology andIndications forSurgical Treatment
The most common extrahepatic benign biliary diseases include acute or chronic calculous cholecystitis, acalculous cholecystitis, biliary dyskinesia, choledocolithiasis, ascend­ing cholangitis, gallstone pancreatitis, and Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Less common but potentially equally affecting pathologies include choledochal cysts and benign biliary strictures.
Calculous cholecystitis, choledocolithiasis, ascending cholangitis, gallstone pancreatitis are all potential compli­cations from gallstones. Gallstones form secondary to imbalances in the three components of bile (phospholip­ids, bile salts, and cholesterols) and are either cholesterol stones (70%) or pigment stones (30%). Cholesterol stones form secondary to a relative abundance of cholesterol compared to solubilizing phospholipid and bile salts which leads to cholesterol crystallization [68]. Cholesterol stone precipitation is also catalyzed by mucus glycoprotein, secreted by gall bladder and biliary duct epithelial cells to bind lipids and bile pigments, and gall bladder hypomotil­ity [68, 69]. Pigment stones can be either black or brown; black pigment stones precipitate in the gall bladder lumen and are produced in hemolytic disorders (sickle cell ane­mia, hereditary spherocytosis, Gilbert syndrome) when bilirubin polymers bind mucus glycoproteins [68, 70]. Brown stones precipitate in the bile ducts secondary to bacterial byproducts that increase the concentration of unconjugated bilirubin, which then complexes with cal­cium to form stones [68, 70].

5.3.1 Acute Calculous Cholecystitis

Acute calculous cholecystitis is an inammation of the gall­bladder that most commonly results from a stone-dependent outlet obstruction at either the infundibulum or cystic duct [71]. The outlet obstruction leads to gall bladder distension, wall edema and inammation with resulting vascular con­gestion, that if left untreated progresses to wall necrosis and fundal perforation. Bactobilia occurs in 20% of patients with acute cholecystitis [72] while bacteremia develops in a minority of patients (<10%) but is associated with increased mortality [73]. In 87% of bacteremic patients, a single bacte­rial isolate is identied and is most often either Escherichia Coli or Klebsiella pneumonia [73].
The Tokyo Guidelines can be used to grade cholecystitis severity with predicted 30-day mortality rate, which can aid in guiding treatment options within the context of patient presentation, comorbidities, and goals [74]. For patients who
are surgical candidates, standard of care treatment is urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with or without intraoperative cholangiogram to verify biliary anatomy and ensure com­mon bile duct patency. Attaining a critical view of safety has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of bile duct injury [75]. This is accomplished by clearing the hepatocystic triangle of fat and brous tissue and dissecting the lower third of the gall bladder from the cystic plate to visualize only two struc­tures, the cystic duct and cystic artery, entering the gall blad­der [76]. If severe pericholecystic inammation prevents safe denition of the critical view of safety, conversion to an open approach may be necessary [75, 77]. Risk factors for conversion to an open approach include male gender, obe­sity, leukocytosis and elevated serum bilirubin, and history of previous surgery [7880]. Alternatively, if the critical view of safety is not attainable, a subtotal fenestrating or subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy can be performed [81]. A subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy involves excis­ing the peritonealized gall bladder, leaving the posterior gall bladder wall in situ, and suture ligating the cystic duct [81]. A subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy involves excising the peritonealized gall bladder and closing the inferior gall­bladder (sewing or stapling) to recreate a small lumen with a patent cystic duct [81]. Fenestration is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative bile leak (18% vs 7%), wound infection (11% vs 3%), and longer hospitalization (5 vs 3 days); however, reconstitution is associated with a higher risk of recurrent biliary pathology (18% vs 9%) [82].
Non-operative management of acute calculous cholecystitis may be necessary for patients who are not surgical candidates or whose pericholecystic inammation precludes safe dissec­tion. Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement allows for immediate clinical improvement in >80% of patients and can be followed by interval cholecystectomy (performed at least 6weeks after placement) in select patients [8385].
A more recently developed management option for patients who are not surgical candidates (i.e. terminal can­cer), includes internal drainage with lumen-apposing self­expandable metallic stents (LASEMS), placed between the stomach or duodenum and the gall bladder to facilitate enteric drainage [86]. Although preliminary observational studies report few complications and high rates of symptom resolution, outcomes data and randomized studies are still pending [86].

5.3.2 Chronic Cholecystitis

Chronic cholecystitis results from repeated transient gall bladder outlet obstruction, most commonly from intermittent stone impaction at the cystic duct or infundibulum. This pathology appears to be more common in obese female
5 Surgical Approach to Pancreas, Liver, Biliary Physiologic Impairment
39
patients and is thought to be related to an increased biliary cholesterol concentration in this patient population [87].
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis is a form of chronic cholecystitis that can appear on ultrasound and axial imaging similarly to gall bladder cancer. It is dened by signicant inammation and brosis of the gall bladder wall with asym­metric wall thickening, mass formation, and bile extravasa­tion into the gall bladder wall [88, 89]. Its exact pathogenesis is unknown, but it is associated with gallstones and geogra­phy (higher incidence in India) and may be associated with an increased risk of gall bladder cancer [89].
Management of chronic cholecystitis and xanthogranulo­matous cholecystitis can be approached similarly to man­agement of acute cholecystitis, however, given the chronicity of symptoms, cholecystectomy may be less urgently indicated.

5.3.3 Acalculous Cholecystitis

Acalculous cholecystitis occurs secondary to gall bladder aperistalsis in the context of concomitant major illness (i.e. sepsis, severe trauma or burns), severe vascular disease, or advanced diabetes [9093]. In these physiologically compro­mised states, it is hypothesized that lack of gall bladder con­traction promotes bile stasis and biliary sludge, eventually resulting in gall bladder wall edema, inammation, and infection [94, 95].
Due to the concomitant severe illness, management of acalculous cholecystitis is non-operative. Gall bladder decompression is facilitated through percutaneous cholecys­tostomy tube placement with potential for interval cholecys­tectomy. Unfortunately, the mortality risk of patients who undergo percutaneous cholecystostomy placement for acal­culous cholecystitis is almost 15%, which likely reects the impact of severe systemic illness rather than cholecystitis­specic mortality alone [96, 97].

5.3.4 Biliary Dyskinesia

Biliary dyskinesia is a symptomatic functional disorder of the gall bladder with unclear etiology, but is hypothesized to result from metabolic disturbance of gastrointestinal and/or gall bladder motility. Patients have biliary symptoms (post­prandial right upper quadrant pain with radiation to the right shoulder, nausea, anorexia) without any evidence of gall­stones or gall bladder inammation on ultrasound. Hepatobiliary diacetic acid scan (HIDA) with ejection frac­tion has been used to aid in the diagnosis of biliary dyskine­sia. In the presence of biliary pain but the absence of stones or pericholecystic inammation, an ejection fraction <35%
may support a diagnosis of biliary dyskinesia [98, 99]. For patients with convincing clinical symptoms, elective laparo­scopic cholecystectomy is indicated.

5.3.5 Choledocolithiasis

Symptomatic choledocolithiasis occurs when gallstones become impacted in the common bile duct. Choledocolithiasis may be transient and clinically occult; 4% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy for cholelithia­sis with patent biliary ducts in preoperative workup have incidentally discovered choledocolithiasis [100]. However, choledocolithiasis may also present as biliary colic or more serious clinical sequelae such as obstructive jaundice with or without ascending cholangitis and gall stone pancreati­tis. Primary choledocolithiasis refers to stones that form in the common bile duct and is more commonly seen with pigment stones [101]. In contrast, secondary choledocoli­thiasis refers to stones, more commonly cholesterol stones, that form in the gall bladder and then migrate via the cystic duct to the common bile duct [101].
Surgical management of symptomatic choledocolithia­sis requires common bile duct clearance and cholecystec­tomy. Common bile duct clearance can be achieved with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and ductal balloon dilation, laparo­scopic transcystic common bile duct exploration with cho­ledocoscopy, laparoscopic choledocotomy and common bile duct exploration, or less commonly, open cholecystec­tomy with duodenotomy and manual stone extraction. A two-stage approach consists of either pre- or post-cholecys­tectomy ERCP with sphincterotomy and balloon dilation, while a single stage approach refers to cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration and stone clearance during the index operation. Both approaches are effective strategies with equivalent duct clearance success rates and morbidity [102].
A two stage approach, with ERCP prior to cholecystec­tomy, is preferred in patients who present with ascending cholangitis (with or without gallstone pancreatitis) both for source control and to increase safety of eventual cholecystec­tomy. However, for patients who present with obstructive jaundice or gallstone pancreatitis without sepsis, a period of observation may be benecial as up to 75% of stones will pass spontaneously [103]. After symptom resolution, these patients may undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram to ensure duct patency. This sequence is particularly important to consider, as it avoids ERCP and the potential for post-ERCP pancreatitis which occurs in 10–15% of patients and can result in severe sys­temic illness [104].
40
A. W. Acher et al.
5.3.6 Sphincter ofOddi Dysfunction
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction has an unclear etiology but is hypothesized to occur secondary to impaired contractility of the Sphincter of Oddi that results in recurrent biliary colic or pancreatitis. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is most com­monly diagnosed in patients with post-cholecystectomy bili­ary colic. Treatment remains controversial, as does the diagnosis itself. In randomized trials of sphincterotomy ver­sus sham procedure, patients with post-cholecystectomy biliary symptoms who underwent sphincterotomy did not have greater improvement in symptoms [105]. However, in randomized trials comparing symptom resolution in patients with manometry conrmed abnormal sphincter tone, greater symptom improvement was demonstrated in patients with
RHD
LHD
CHD
abnormal sphincter who underwent sphincterotomy com­pared with individuals who underwent a sham procedure [106, 107].

5.3.7 Choledochal Cysts

Choledochal cysts (CC) are dened by dilation of the intra and/or extrahepatic biliary ductal system. While mainly con­sidered benign lesions, certain subtypes of CC have signi­cant potential for malignant transformation. There are 5 subtypes of CC, classied by location and extent of biliary involvement (Fig.5.4). Type I CC are the most common sub­type (50–80% of CC) with fusiform dilation of the common bile duct and lack of biliary mucosal cells [108, 109]. Type II
STOMACH
DUO
Type IType II Type III
Type IVAType IVB Type V
Fig. 5.4 Choledochal cyst classication. Type I cysts are fusiform dila-
tations of the common bile duct (CBD). Type II cysts are true divertic­ula of the CBD and type III CC (choledochoceles) are intraduodenal dilations of the common channel. Type IVA CC consist of multiple intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary dilatations, while type IVB CC
have extra-hepatic biliary dilatation with a normal intrahepatic biliary tree. Type V CC, or Caroli’s disease, consist of cystic dilation of the intrahepatic biliary tree. RHD right hepatic duct, LHD left hepatic duct, CHD common hepatic duct, DUO duodenum