Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_775_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
46 Мб
Скачать
Distal Pancreatectomy withEn Bloc
CHA
Celiac Axis Resection
SatoshiHirano, ToruNakamura, andToshimichiAsano
47
Abstract
Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR), which is an extended surgical procedure for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic body, is per­formed for complete resection of tumors with invasion to the celiac, and/or the common hepatic artery, and/or their plexuses. Although the procedure of DP-CAR is techni­cally demanding, a high rate of negative surgical margin resection can be achieved with cautious selection of can­didates and with appropriate systematic techniques. A relatively high morbidity rate due to postoperative pan­creatic stula and ischemic gastropathy has been reported. A recent report on the long-term outcomes following DP-CAR in 80 patients has described a 5-year overall sur­vival (OS) rate of 32.7% and median survival time of
30.9months. It was revealed that OS for the patients who underwent preoperative therapy were signicantly better than for those who underwent upfront surgery.
47.1 Concepts ofDistal Pancreatectomy withCeliac Axis Resection (DP-CAR)
Locally advanced cancer of the body of the pancreas often involves the common hepatic artery (CHA) and/or the celiac axis (CA), with perineural invasion of the nerve plexuses surrounding these arteries. Although these tumors are regarded as borderline resectable or locally advanced dis­eases according to the NCCN guidelines® Version 1.2021 [1], distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) may be the only surgical option for treatment of such advanced diseases [2]. An advantage of DP-CAR is reduction in the likelihood of a positive retroperitoneal mar-
S. Hirano (*) · T. Nakamura · T. Asano Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan e-mail: satto@med.hokudai.ac.jp
gin by complete en bloc resection of the distal pancreas, together with the entire surrounding structures, especially the CHA, CA, and the circumferential nerve plexus along with the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), without the need for either arterial, pancreatobiliary or gastrointestinal recon­struction (Fig.47.1).
This procedure was originally designed as en bloc lymph­adenectomy combined with total gastrectomy and resection of the celiac axis for advanced gastric cancer by Appleby in 1953 [3]. It was rst adopted by Nimura in 1976 [4] for patients with advanced pancreatic body cancer with invasion of the celiac axis. A modication to the procedure with pres­ervation of the entire stomach was made by Ogata and his colleagues [5] in 1991 (in Japanese with English abstract) and Kondo [6] in 2001, which resulted in better postopera­tive nutritional status. The rst report regarding the long- term outcome of DP-CAR was published by Kondo and Hirano in 2007 [7], which included the results of 24 consecutive patients with favorable postoperative survival. Since then, the procedure and the term “DP-CAR” have been widely
SA
PV
Pl CA
Du
kidney
Fig. 47.1 Schematic cross-sectional view demonstrating the resection
area of distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR). The dotted line indicates the dissection plane. adr adrenal gland, Ao aorta, CA celiac axis, CHA common hepatic artery, crus crus of the diaphragm, Du duodenum, g celiac ganglion, IVC inferior vena cava, pl celiac plexus, PV portal vein, SA splenic artery, SV splenic vein
IVC
g
crus
Ao
crus
SV
g
adr
spleen
kidney
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022 M. Makuuchi et al. (eds.), The IASGO Textbook of Multi-Disciplinary Management of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Diseases,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0063-1_47
361
362
CA
S. Hirano et al.
acknowledged. Nowadays, several pancreatic surgeons have performed this procedure for carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.
47.2 Resected andPreserved Organs inDP-CAR
Perineural invasion in patients with pancreatic body cancer can spread towards the celiac plexus and ganglions directly or via the nerve plexuses surrounding the splenic and the common hepatic arteries. Although DP-CAR includes en bloc resection of these arteries and plexuses, reconstruction of the arterial system is not required because of early devel­opment of a collateral arterial circulation via the pancreato­duodenal arcades from the superior mesenteric artery. The entire alimentary tract, including the stomach and bile duct, which are not invaded by the cancer, is preserved. Cholecystectomy is, however, performed for preventing postoperative ischemic rupture of the gallbladder. If the tumor of the pancreatic body invades other organs directly, concomitant resection of the organs, including the alimen­tary tract, could be performed. In case that a tumor has invaded the stomach to a depth that necessitates full- thickness resection, total gastrectomy should be considered because healing of the anastomosis might be disturbed by an insuf­cient collateral arterial ow. As far as possible, the entire stomach should be preserved in cases without cancer inva­sion of the stomach, to maintain the patient’s nutritional sta­tus and tolerance of oral anticancer agents. SMA preservation, even with complete eradication of the surrounding plexus, is the key feature of this procedure, which maintains arterial supply to the hepatobiliary system and the stomach. Resection of the portal vein is an optional procedure.
47.3 Arterial Supply totheLiver andtheStomach After DP-CAR
After division of the CA with the CHA and splenic artery (SA), the hepatic and the gastric arterial ow depend on the ow from the gastroduodenal artery (GDA), which should, therefore, denitely be preserved with the pancreatic head during DP-CAR.The collateral pathways via the SMA, pan­creatoduodenal arcades, and GDA maintain the arterial blood supply to the hepatobiliary system. Since the collateral path­ways also ensure arterial ow to the right gastroepiploic artery, the entire stomach can be preserved (Fig.47.2).
In the past, preoperative coil embolization of the CHA had routinely performed to enlarge the collateral arterial pathway, so as to reduce ischemia-related complications such as ischemic gastropathy, liver abscess, and perforation of the biliary system. However, the usefulness of the CHA
PHA
CHA
GEA
GDA
PPD
APD
Fig. 47.2 Schematic drawing of collateral arterial pathways via the
pancreatoduodenal arcades from the superior mesenteric artery follow­ing DP-CAR.The arrows show the direction of arterial ow from the superior mesenteric artery to the liver and stomach via the pancreato­duodenal arcades. APD anterior pancreatoduodenal arcade, CA celiac axis, CHA common hepatic artery, GDA gastroduodenal artery, GEA right gastroepiploic artery, LGA left gastric artery, PHA proper hepatic artery, PPD posterior pancreatoduodenal arcade, SA splenic artery, SMA superior mesenteric artery
LGA
SA
TUMOR
SMA
embolization has been reported to be negative [8]. The pro­cedure has been no longer essential.
47.4 Selection ofCandidates forDP-CAR
Tumor progression is cautiously evaluated mainly with pre­operative multi-detector row computed tomography (MD­CT), with supplemental use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The indica­tion for DP-CAR is locally advanced ductal adenocarcinoma of the body of the pancreas, such as that involving or abutting the CHA, the root of the SA, and/or the CA, without involve­ment of the GDA, SMA, and inferior pancreatoduodenal artery (IPDA). Patients with involvement of less than approx­imately half the circumference of the SMA plexus should be considered candidates for DP-CAR because complete dis­section of the SMA plexus without exposing the cancer can be achieved by dividing the plexus on the opposite side of the tumor. For oncologically safe ligation and division of the root of the CA in front of the aorta, a 5–7mm non-cancerous length of the CA from the adventitia of the aorta is required.
47.5 Surgical Procedure ofDP-CAR
DP-CAR usually includes resection of the distal pancreas and the spleen, together with en bloc resection of the celiac, common hepatic and left gastric arteries, the celiac plexus
47 Distal Pancreatectomy withEn Bloc Celiac Axis Resection
CHA stump
crus
CA stump
363
CA
GDA
Pancreatic stump
Fig. 47.3 Post-resection view during distal pancreatectomy with en
bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR). Ao aorta, CA celiac axis, CHA common hepatic artery, crus crus of the diaphragm, GDA gastroduode­nal artery, graft interposed iliac vein graft, IVC inferior vena cava, RV renal vein, SMA superior mesenteric artery, SMV superior mesenteric vein
graft
SMV
SMA
Ao
Kidney
O/P
and bilateral ganglions, and the circumferential nerve plexus around the SMA. Left perirenal fat tissue, the left adrenal gland, the entire retroperitoneal fat tissue containing lymph nodes cranial to the left renal vein, the transverse mesocolon covering the body of the pancreas, and the inferior mesen­teric vein are also resected (Fig.47.3).
To achieve R0 resection, a systematic procedure of DP-CAR, which consisted of right and left dorsal (rst step), ventral (second step), and medial (third step) approaches, is recommended (Fig.47.4). In the rst step (dorsal approach), the lower parts of the SMA are exposed following Kocher’s maneuver, with complete eradication of the right celiac gan­glion by exposing the right crus of the diaphragm. The plexus of the SMA is rst divided at the dorsal end (opposite side of the tumor), and the excision is extended by 4–5cm in the longitudinal direction. The median arcuate ligament has to be divided to expose just the root of the CA where it should be divided. Then, after moving to the left side, en bloc resec­tion of the retroperitoneal fat, together with the upper part of the perirenal fat, including the left adrenal gland cranial to the left renal vessels are performed in exposing the left crus. In this approach, bilateral para-aortic nodes and ganglions are completely dissected. In the second step (ventral approach), transection of the pancreas is performed after dividing the common hepatic artery. When a tumor is located near the GDA, it should be mobilized laterally in order to obtain a cancer-free margin at the site of division of the pan­creatic parenchyma. Reconstruction of the portal and/or superior mesenteric vein should be performed in this step, if necessary. In the third step (medial approach), division of the SMA plexus that was performed in the rst step is extended longitudinally to just proximal to the IPDA to achieve com­plete resection of the plexus. The procedure is completed
2
3
SMA
1
Fig. 47.4 A systematic procedure for achieving negative surgical mar-
gin in DP-CAR.The procedure is composed with 3 steps; the rst step () is Rt. and Lt. dorsal approach, the second () is ventral approach, and nal step () is medial approach
1
after dissecting between the SMA plexus and the uncinate process of the pancreas.
Accidental injury to the IPDA or GDA compromises col­lateral blood ow and leads to fatal complications, such as gastric necrosis and/or liver infarction. If this occurs, micro­scopic anastomosis between the proper hepatic artery and middle colic artery (MCA) [9], or the right gastroepiploic artery and MCA [10] could be a possible option for main­taining arterial ow to both the stomach and the liver.
47.6 Postoperative Course Following
DP-CAR
The most frequent morbidity after DP-CAR is pancreatic s­tula, which occurs relatively easily because the pancreatic parenchyma needs to be divided at the pancreatic head in patients with a tumor extending to the proximal end of the pancreas, beyond the portal vein. In such cases, the cut sur­face of the pancreas becomes wider than that after usual dis­tal pancreatectomy, in which the pancreatic parenchyma is divided at the neck of the pancreas. It is rather important to insert an indwelling drain at an appropriate position beside the pancreatic stump during surgery, so as to avoid postop­erative hemorrhage from a pseudoaneurysm in the stump of the CHA.The second most common morbidity is ischemic gastropathy due to decreased gastric blood ow [11]. According to data from 80 consecutive patients who under­went DP-CAR [12], the major complications dened as
364
S. Hirano et al.
grade 3 or higher in the Clavien-Dindo classication occurred in 33 (41.3%) patients; pancreatic stula and ischemic gas­tropathy occurred in 47 (57.5%) and 23 (28.8%) patients, respectively. Four patients out of 80 (5%) died in the hospi­tal. Postoperative hospital stays ranged from 12 to 208days, with a median of 38days [12].
One of the other postoperative complications is stubborn diarrhea due to complete dissection of the nerve system around the SMA, CA, and bilateral ganglions. From a pub­lished data, approximately half of the patients regularly required anti-diarrheal agents, and the remaining half only occasionally required or never used the agents over a median follow-up period of 39months [13].
Contrary to the adverse effects of resection of nerve tis­sues, patients enjoy the complete disappearance of pain, even if it has been controlled by opioids just before surgery [6].
Since both the incidence of morbidity and poor quality of life postoperatively are major factors inuencing the toler­ance of adjuvant treatment, surgeons should make greater efforts to improve these factors following DP-CAR.
47.7 Long-Term Outcomes Following
DP-CAR
In 2007, the long-term outcomes of DP-CAR were rst reported in a series of 23 patients with locally advanced pancreatic body cancer who underwent DP-CAR under a policy of “surgery rst” [7]. With R0 resectability in 91% of the cases and a median follow-up time of 27.4months, the estimated 5-year survival rate was 42% and the median survival was 21months. Nine years after the rst report, a recent report that included 80 patients was published from the same institute, which indicated estimated disease-spe­cic 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of 81.1%,
56.9%, and 32.7%, respectively, and a median survival time of 30.9 months after a median follow-up period of
63.5months [12].
Despite the excellent local control with an R0 resection rate of 92.5% in the report, early recurrence (predominantly in the liver) occurred after surgery, which resulted in poor survival time. It was also revealed that the survival time of the patients who underwent preoperative therapy were sig­nicantly better than for those who underwent upfront sur­gery [12]. The ndings show DP-CAR should be performed as part of multidisciplinary treatment.
Although DP-CAR could be used to treat locally advanced pancreatic body cancer, future prospective studies with a large patient cohort for ensuring adequate patient selection,
and perioperative treatments are necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of this innovative surgery.

References

1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines
www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreatic.pdf
2. Kondo S, Katoh S, Hirano S, Ambo Y, Tanaka E, Okushiba S, Morikawa T, Kanai M, Yano T. Results of radical distal pancre­atectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic body. Langenbeck Arch Surg. 2003;388:101–6.
3. Appleby LH.The coeliac axis in the expansion of the operation for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1953;6:707.
4. Nimura Y, Hattori T, Miura K, Nakajima N, Hibi M.A case of advanced carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas resected by the Appleby operation. Operation. 1976;30:885–9. (In Japanese)
5. Hishinuma S, Ogata Y, Matsui J, Ozawa I, Inada T, Shimizu H, Kobu K, Ikeda T, Koyama Y.Two cases of cancer of the pancreatic body undergoing preservation with distal pancreatectomy com­bined with resection of the celiac axis. Jap J Gastroenterol Surg. 1991;24:2782–6. (In Japanese with English abstract)
6. Kondo S, Katoh H, Omi M, Hirano S, Ambo Y, Tanaka E, Okushiba S, Morikawa T, Kanai M, Yano T. Radical distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery, plexus, and ganglions for advanced cancer of the pancreatic body: a preliminary report on perfect pain relief. JOP. 2001;2:93–7.
7. Hirano S, Kondo S, Hara T, Ambo Y, Tanaka E, Shichinohe T, Suzuki O, Hazama K.Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: long­term results. Ann Surg. 2007;246:46–51.
8. Ueda A, Sakai N, Yoshitomi H, Furukawa K, Takayashiki T, Kuboki S, Takano S, Suzuki D, Kagawa S, Mishima T, Nakadai E, Miyazaki M, Ohtsuka M. Is hepatic artery coil embolization useful in dis­tal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer? World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:124.
9. Suzuki H, Hosouchi Y, Sasaki S, Araki K, Kubo N, Watanabe A, Kuwano H.Reconstruction of the hepatic artery with the middle colic artery is feasible in distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection: a case report. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;5:224–8.
10. Kondo S, Ambo Y, Katoh H, Hirano S, Tanaka E, Okushiba S, Morikawa T, Igawa H, Yamamoto Y, Sugihara T. Middle colic artery-gastroepiploic artery bypass for compromised collateral ow in distal pancreatectomy with celiac artery resection. Hepato­Gastroenterology. 2003;50:305–7.
11. Kondo S, Katho H, Hirano S, Ambo Y, Tanaka E, Maeyama Y, Morikawa T, Okushiba S.Ischemic gastropathy after distal pancre­atectomy with celiac axis resection. Surg Today. 2004;34:337–40.
12. Nakamura T, Hirano S, Noji T, Asano T, Okamura K, Tsuchikawa T, Murakami S, Kurashima Y, Ebihara Y, Nakanishi Y, Tanaka K, Shichinohe T.Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resec­tion (modied Appleby procedure) for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: a single-center review of 80 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:969–75.
13. Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E, Shichinohe T, Tsuchikawa T, Kato K, Matsumoto J.Postoperative bowel function and nutritional status following distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection. Dig Surg. 2010;27:212–6.
®
). Pancreatic adenocarcinoma version 1. 2021. https://
Modified Distal Pancreatectomy withCeliac Axis En-bloc Resection
Ken-ichiOkada andHirokiYamaue
48
Abstract
Since most pancreatic adenocarcinomas recur systemi­cally, and tumor involving arterial structures recur rapidly even after the radical resection. In the era of neoadjuvant therapy, surgeon should re-consider whether the presence of just an R0 resection should be the primary issue of cure in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. By safer modication of the Appleby operation, this procedure attract the attention of pancre­atic surgeon again as a radical pancreatectomy for border­line resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body/tail carcinoma. The roles of the Appleby operation and arte­rial resection are the ability to take a wide surgical margin in pancreatic body/tail carcinoma, and to relieve the can­cer pain by celiac axis en-bloc resection combined with removal of the tumor inltrating nerve plexuses. The modied Appleby operation, a synonym for “distal pan­createctomy with celiac axis en-bloc resection”; DP-CAR was feasible and safe compared with standard distal pan­createctomy when it was performed at high-volume cen­ter. In the era of stronger regimen of chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma, there will be increased frequency of the chance to consider the indication of this procedure. The procedure may be justied in highly selected patients owing to the potential survival benet in sophisticated institutions. In this chapter, we particularly describe about the technique and impact of preservation of the left gastric artery in DP-CAR.

48.1 Introduction

The application of distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis en­bloc resection; DP-CAR [1], so-called the modied Appleby operation, for pancreatic carcinoma still remains controver­sial because of the lack of large number of study. One of the advantages of this procedure is the surgical radicality of deep dissection behind of tumor by the division of the root of the celiac axis, and another is the impact to resolve the preopera­tive cancer pain according to the tumor invasion into nerve plexus. There are surely several prior reports suggesting that an R0 resection is an essential requirement for long survival. In contrast, an R0 resection is not the only consideration for the impact of survival in advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Recently, in an international multicenter analysis for 174 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who under­went DP-CAR, the R0 resection rate was 60%, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies were applied for respectively 69% and 67% of the patients, and the median overall survival period was 19months [2]. Despite these reports, the indica­tions for DP-CAR remain controversial with regard to the curability and survival benet. This procedure can provide a clinical benet for the patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body/tail carcinoma after the strategy of neoadjuvant therapy. Furthermore stronger and adequate preoperative therapy prior to surgery is required to improve their survival.
48.2 History, Background,
andModication ofAppleby Operation forPancreatic Cancer
In 1973, Fortner introduced the regional resection of pancre­atic cancer with major vascular en-bloc resection as a new
K.-i. Okada (*) · H. Yamaue Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan e-mail: okada@wakayama-med.ac.jp
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022 M. Makuuchi et al. (eds.), The IASGO Textbook of Multi-Disciplinary Management of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Diseases,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0063-1_48
approach [3]. In this literature, actual survival by Kaplan­Meier estimate was 62% at one year, compared with a 36% one year survival rate for 17 patients undergoing pancreati-
365
366
Type IIa(4.5%) Type IIb(5%)
K.-i. Okada and H. Yamaue
coduodenectomy for less advanced cancer at same institution from 1959–1969 [4]. This approach was described that the greatest potential benet of regional pancreatectomy would appear to be in patients with a small pancreatic cancer where regional resection would give a wide margin. Appleby opera­tion was rstly reported as resection of celiac axis for com­plete lymphadenectomy in radical resection of gastric carcinoma in 1953 [5, 6]. Nimura etal. reported the adapta­tion the Appleby operation for resection of pancreatic body/ tail carcinoma involving celiac axis and/or common hepatic artery in 1976 [7]. In 1991, Hishinuma etal. modied this procedure with preservation of the entire stomach, which improved postoperative nutritional status and quality of life [8]. Konishi et al. reported reconstruction of the hepatic artery when pulsation in the proper hepatic artery was weak after test occlusion of the celiac axis in 2000 [9]. Since then, several institutions have reported their experienced with the modied Appleby operation for advanced pancreatic body/ tail carcinoma, i.e., distal pancreatectomy combined with celiac axis en-bloc resection, which was named DP-CAR by Kondo etal. [10]. Despite reports of a few long-term survi­vors, the overall survival benet and the risks of this chal­lenging operation are unknown because previous reports
have included only a small number of patients. In the era of safer modication and innovation of the Appleby operation and the transition of the concept of borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma, this procedure attract pancreatic sur­geon’s attention again as a radical pancreatectomy for bor­derline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body/tail carcinoma. In 2014, we have rstly introduced the preserva­tion of the left gastric artery (LGA) on the basis of anatomi­cal features in DP-CAR (modied DP-CAR) [11].
48.3 The Anatomical Features About Celiac
Trunk andIts Branches
Although there are many reports on the classication of celiac artery anatomy, the classication that can be applied to variations of past papers is relatively simple and easy to understand is the classication described by Marco-Clement etal. in 2016 (Fig.48.1) [12]. In this paper, almost 90% are Type I called complete celiac trunk, Type Ia: complete bifur­cated celiac trunk (LGA arises rst) is 57.6%, Type Ib: com­plete trifurcated celiac trunk is 32.1%, and incomplete celiac trunk is the Type IIa called hepatosplenic trunk is Type IIa
CHA
CHA
LGA
CA
SA
CHA
Type Ia(57.6%) Type Ib(32.1%) Type Ic(0.8%)
LGA
CA
SA
CHA
CA
CA
LGA
SA
SA
LGA
Ex. Br
CHA
CA
LGA
SA
Fig. 48.1 Classication of celiac branches by Marco-Clement etal. [12]
48 Modied Distal Pancreatectomy withCeliac Axis En-bloc Resection
367
4.5%, and the gastrosplenic trunk Type IIb is 5%. From the viewpoint of anatomical factors, LGA cannot preserved in Type Ib cannot preserve in pancreatic body cancer with posi­tive invasion of the roots of the celiac artery, common hepatic artery, and splenic artery. For other are examined for each individual case, and the LGA can be preserved without microscopic cancer residual (R0). The planned surgical method and planned dissection layer should be planned in consideration of the distance from the tumor to the LGA and the site of the LGA root [11].
48.4 The Organs andTissues Resected by theModied Appleby Operation (DP-CAR)
Hirano and Kondo etal. described [1] the resected organ and tissues by this procedure were as follows, the procedures routinely included en bloc resection of the celiac, common hepatic, and LGA, the celiac plexus and ganglions, the nerve plexus around the superior mesenteric artery, a part of the crus of the diaphragm and the Gerota’s fascia, the left adre­nal gland, the retroperitoneal fat tissues bearing lymph nodes above the left renal vein, the transverse mesocolon covering the body of the pancreas, and the inferior mesenteric vein. Resection of the portal vein and the middle colic vessels was optional. In general, no reconstruction of the arterial system was required because of early development of the collateral arterial pathways via the pancreatoduodenal arcades from the superior mesenteric artery. In addition, with preservation of the stomach, no reconstruction of the alimentary tract was required. Sato etal. reported about the feasibility of middle colic artery—LGA bypass in patients who undergo LGA resecting DP-CAR [13]. Based on the anatomical features and the relationship between the tumor and artery, the LGA and inferior phrenic arteries can be preserved. Table 48.1 shows the list of organs, vessels, and other tissues which is resected and preserved in this procedure.
48.5 The Indication ofModied Appleby Operation (DP-CAR) inPatient withPancreatic Body/Tail Carcinoma
First, this procedure should be performed in the selected institutions where well-trained and skillful staffs [2]. Regarding the tumor status, in the early period of the adap­tation of the modied Appleby operation (DP-CAR), this procedure was indicated for patients with pancreatic body/ tail carcinoma involving celiac axis and/or common hepatic artery. Recent literature reported this procedure is indicated for the patients whose pancreatic body/tail tumors involved or touched at least one of the common hepatic artery, the root of the splenic artery, or the celiac axis [1], which means
Table 48.1 The organs, vessels, and other tissues that are resected or
preserved in the modied Appleby operation
Resection Preservation
Organ Pncreas (body/tail),
Vessels Celiac artery,
Other tissues
a
Several institutions resect gallbladder, left gastric artery routinely, and
others preserve under denite condition or reconstruct it
left adrenal gland, gallbladder
common hepatic artery, splenic artery, dorsal pancreatic artery, short gastric vessels, posterior gastric artery, inferior mesenteric vein.
Part of the crus of the diaphragm, the Gerota’s fascia, the celiac plexus and ganglions, the nerve plexus around the superior mesenteric artery, the retroperitoneal fat tissues bearing lymph nodes above the left renal vein, the transverse mesocolon covering the body of the pancreas.
a
, spleen
Stomach, duodenum
inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery, gastroduodenal artery (pancreatoduodenal arcades), proper hepatic artery, the right gastric and right gastroepiploic vessels, gastrocolic trunk.
Right adrenal gland, bilateral kidneys.
Optional resection
Portal vein, middle colic vessels. Left gastric
a
artery
and inferior phrenic arteries can be preserved based on the anatomical features.
a parts of resectable pancreatic body/tail carcinomas situ­ated near the root of the splenic artery also indicated for this procedure as well. Our investigation regarding the relation­ship between curability and the distance between the edge of the tumor and the splenic artery root in patients who underwent standard DP revealed that the microscopically positive margins were detected more frequently in the patients with tumors situated 10 mm from the splenic artery than those with a distance of >10mm from the splenic artery [14]. Therefore, we suggest that DP-CAR should be performed to obtain an R0 resection in those patients with potentially resectable pancreatic body/tail carcinoma who would otherwise receive a standard DP.In addition to that, our study demonstrated the overall survival rate in patients with pathologically negative invasion for portal venous sys­tem and artery (double negative invasion) was greater than that of the other patients. Moreover, extended pancreatec­tomy with major arterial resection did not result in any long­term survivors in many previous reports. Therefore, we evaluate carefully the patients with double negative invasion into portal venous system and artery on preoperative imag­ing study for indication of DP-CAR.
368
K.-i. Okada and H. Yamaue
48.6 Risk Score fortheModied Appleby Operation (DP-CAR)
From an international multicenter analysis for 191 DP-CAR patients, the 90-day mortality rate was 5.5% at 5 high- volume (1 DP-CAR/year) and 18% at 18 low-volume DP-CAR centers (P=0.015). A risk score with age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, multiv­isceral resection, open versus minimally invasive surgery, and low- versus high-volume center performed well in both the design and validation cohorts (P=0.642). The main nd­ing is that annual DP-CAR case volume is the most impor­tant predictor for 90-day mortality. The investigators of this study concluded that future studies should aim at (prospec­tively) validating the clinical risk score, which was made available online at www.pancreascalculator.com [2].
48.7 Preoperative Preparation fortheModied Appleby Operation (DP-CAR)
The necessity of the preoperative coil embolization still remains controversial. Several investigators have performed the modied Appleby operation without preoperative coil embolization of the common hepatic artery (CHA). The safety and efcacy is still needed to be evaluated in the clini­cal trials. Although, there is no evidence of decreased risk of these ischemia related complication by preoperative emboli­zation of the CHA, preoperative angiography should be car­ried out and variations of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA) were examined to safely perform this procedure. The preoperative coil embolization of the CHA should be performed as collaborative work between the sur­geons and the interventional radiologist. The surgeons should request the planned ligation/division site precisely to them, and the radiologist was requested to place the coil in hopeful position without coil migration into the preserving planned arteries in a safe manner. The diameter of the IPDA usually increase about 1.5–2 times by the procedure.
the proper hepatic artery (PHA). Conrming the negative for cancer cell inltration of frozen section by harvesting the periarterial nerve plexus around the bifurcation should be performed to evaluate the resectability in patients whose tumor is adjacent this region. Kocher’s maneuver should be performed in case of accidental bleeding from portal venous system. The gastrocolic trunk was preserved for venous return from the stomach. Transection of the pancreas was performed with enough margin from the tumor to conrm the negative for cancer cell inltration. In patient whose tumor involves the portal vein, the resection and reconstruc­tion of the portal vein was performed antecedently. After pancreatic transaction, the dissection of the retroperitoneum must be performed from the right side to the left side in the manner of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure, because the surgical eld of this procedure is bet­ter and safer for surgeon and assistant in case of accidental bleeding. By en-bloc dissecting the lymph nodes around the CHA, the right celiac ganglion and celiac nerve plexus, the origin of the celiac axis was exposed. Then, blood ow through the PHA, the right gastric artery, and the right gas­troepiploic artery was conrmed by palpation, and intrahe­patic arterial ow was also checked by intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography after clamping the end of the CHA in the patients who had undergone preoperative embolization of the CHA.The CHA was divided just proximal to the origin of the GDA.In the cases with dog-leg branching of PHA and GDA, great care was taken to preserve both arteries by avoid­ing the ligation of bifurcation site. Lifting up the cut end of the distal pancreas and the CHA into the left caudal side, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) was dissected from the surrounding lymph node and nerve plexus toward its origin. Great care was taken to preserve the inferior pancreaticoduo­denal artery (IPDA) arising from the SMA or the rst jejunal artery. The dissecting layer around the SMA is connected to that of the celiac axis (CA) from the caudal side to dorsal side. The origin of the celiac axis was identied circumferen­tially just above the aorta and as divided. The origin and the direction of inferior phrenic arteries should be taken care in dissecting around the CA in front of the aorta.
48.8 The Procedure andPitfalls ofModied Appleby Operation (DP-CAR)
The specic procedure for DP-CAR was as follows: rstly, right gastroepiploic artery/vein, right gastric artery/vein are encircled by vessel tape and preserved. Before the transec­tion of the neck of the pancreas, rstly the bifurcation of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) and the common hepatic artery (CHA) was exposed, followed by exposure of the origin of
48.9 Preservation oftheLeft Gastric Artery ontheBasis ofAnatomical Features
Despite the recent favorable surgical outcomes, delayed gas­tric emptying (DGE) or ischemic gastropathy after the modi­ed Appleby operation (DP-CAR) is a continuous and frustrating complication. DGE induced by ischemic gastrop­athy, with had an incidence varying from 13.0% to 30.8% in previous series [1, 14], is not a life-threatening complication, but results in a prolonged hospital stay and leads to a
ab
48 Modied Distal Pancreatectomy withCeliac Axis En-bloc Resection
369
decreased quality of life (QOL), poorer nutritional status and delayed administration of postoperative adjuvant chemother­apy. In the past studies, several patients underwent combined total gastrectomy to prevent gastric ischemic complications during the modied Appleby operation (DP-CAR) [1, 14]. The left gastric artery (LGA) develops as the rst branch of the celiac trunk embryologically, and it was reported to branch antecedently in 68% to 72% of cases as a rst branch of trifurcation described as above [12]. However, the proce­dures used for the modied Appleby operation (DP-CAR) routinely included en-bloc resection of the LGA [1], although pancreas body cancer requiring DP-CAR does not always involve the LGA or the nerve plexus surrounding the LGA. We prospectively tried to preserve the LGA with enough margins in patients whose LGA branched anteced­ently and in whom the distance between the LGA and carci­noma was more than 10 mm to clarify whether LGA preservation in DP-CAR (modied DP-CAR) could reduce the incidence of DGE and other postoperative complications [11] (Fig. 48.2). The medical records of 37 consecutive patients who underwent DP-CAR were evaluated for the incidence of DGE in 23 patients (62%) with LGA-resecting DP-CAR (conventional DP-CAR) and compared it with 14 patients (38%) who underwent distal pancreatectomy with resection of the common hepatic artery and splenic artery, with preservation of the LGA (modied DP-CAR) for pan-
creatic carcinoma. The patients with tumors situated more than 10 mm away from the antecedent branching LGA underwent modied DP-CAR.The antecedent branching of the LGA was found in 19 patients (51%) in this study. In the conventional DP-CAR group, the LGA were involved in 20 patients (87.0%). Clinically relevant DGE according to the ISGPS grades were: 30% in the conventional DP-CAR group, and 0% in the modied DP-CAR group (P=0.035). The R0 rate was higher in the modied DP-CAR group (79%) compared to the conventional DP-CAR group (43%) (P=0.048). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that resec­tion of the LGA was an independent risk factor for increased incidence of DGE. Therefore, modied DP-CAR signi­cantly reduced the incidence of DGE in comparison to con­ventional DP-CAR. In this series, distal stomach blood/ nerve supply including right gastric, right gastroepiploic arteries and antral nerve branch were preserved, but proxi­mal stomach blood supply including, left gastroepiploic and short gastric arteries were resected in all cases. The LGA preservation can reduced the ischemic gastropathy after DP-CAR, and this approach (preservation of the LGA when feasible) provides another option for surgeons per­forming DP-CAR.Furthermore, in patients whose collat­eral ow had injured or proved to be insufcient during the surgery, arterial reconstruction would compromise collat­eral ow [13].
T
T
Fig. 48.2 The patients with tumors situated more than 10mm away
from the antecedent branching left gastric artery (LGA) underwent modied DP-CAR. A schematic drawing showing the relationship between the division site and the branching site of the LGA (a) in con­ventional DP-CAR and (b) in distal pancreatectomy with resection of
the common hepatic and splenic artery, with preservation of the LGA (modied DP-CAR). Double-headed arrows indicating the site of the division. CA celiac axis, SA splenic artery, CHA common hepatic artery, LGA left gastric artery, T tumor
370
K.-i. Okada and H. Yamaue

48.10 Surgical Technique Preserving Left Gastric Artery

Even when we intent to preserve left gastric artery (LGA) pre­operatively, right gastroepiploic artery/vein, right gastric artery/vein are also rstly encircled by vessel tape and pre­served, and we rule out the cancer cell inltration into the peri­arterial nerve plexuses around GDA or CHA as soon as possible to evaluate resectability. We check the pulsation of GDA and PHA before clamping. After clamping the CHA, we conrmed the pulsation again, and the CHA was ligated and divided at the distal part described as above. We encircled the LGA by vessel tape to preserve in the early phase of surgery as a destination of dissection. Lifting up the CHA by en-bloc dis­secting of lymph nodes around the CHA from the pancreas, the celiac axis was exposed. After conrming that the patients were negative for cancer cell inltration into the nerve plexus surrounding the LGA by an intraoperative histopathological diagnosis of several frozen sections, the celiac artery was divided just after the branching of the LGA.The resection and reconstruction of the portal vein is performed antecedently before radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy pro­cedure. The depth of dissecting layer of retroperitoneum was controlled with wide margin according to the tumor position. Figure48.3 shows the surgical eld after modied DP-CAR.
48.11 Postoperative Complications After Modied Appleby Operation (DP-CAR)
The rates of morbidity after this procedure is not low [2]. The presence of postoperative hemorrhage from the resected stump of the common hepatic artery due to a pancreatic stula after
ST
DP-CAR is difcult to rescue by interventional radiology (IVR) techniques because of the resection of the common hepatic artery. In addition, DP-CAR is associated with signi­cant morbidities such as ischemic gastropathy or hepatic isch­emia [15]. Total gastrectomy was added if severe ischemia of the stomach was observed during operation and if surgeon could not exclude the possibility of future necrosis of the rem­nant stomach in several institutions. Unplanned arterial recon­struction was required in patients with accidental injury [1]. The possible ischemic gastropathy includes irregular, shallow, and wide ulcerations usually in cardia of the stomach thought to be ischemic in origin and delayed gastric emptying after surgery. The issue would directly affect the postoperative recovery and the schedule of adjuvant chemotherapy. As regarding the hepatic ischemia, the recent studies reported the low incidence of clinically relevant hepatic infarction as a case requiring drainage of abscess, and usually abnormal liver function recovered after several days. Necrotic cholecystitis is also reported which could occur postoperatively probably due to the spasm of the gastroduodenal artery and/or proper hepatic artery reported in several studies. The most concern is diarrhea after the removal of the plexus around the celiac axis and the superior mesenteric artery, because the diarrhea would inu­ence the nutritional status and quality of life after surgery. In many studies, diarrhea after this procedure is reported as con­trollable degree to maintain quality of life and nutritional sta­tus by medication, usually with loperamide hydrochloride, and rarely with tincture of opium [1].

48.12 Conclusions

The modied Appleby operation (DP-CAR) may be justied in highly selected patients owing to the potential survival benet compared with patients without resection, and these patients should be treated in multimodal therapy. Recent additional modication by preservation of LGA, i.e. “modi­ed DP-CAR” can lead the procedure to be a safer option.
Stump of CHA
LGA
CA
PV
GDA
RGEAV
Fig. 48.3 The surgical eld after modied DP-CAR. ST stomach, PV
portal vein, SMV superior mesenteric vein, SV splenic vein, RGEAV right gastroepiploic artery/vein, GDA gastroduodenal artery, CA celiac artery, LGA left gastric artery, SMA superior mesenteric artery, CHA, common hepatic artery
SV
SMV
SMA

References

1. Hirano S, Kondo S, Hara T, etal. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body can­cer: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2007;246:46–51.
2. Klompmaker S, Peters NA, van Hilst J, etal. Outcomes and risk score for Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection (DP-CAR): an international multicenter analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:772–81.
3. Fortner JG.Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. Surgery. 1973;73:307–20.
4. Fortner JG, Kim DK, Cubilla A, etal. Regional pancreatectomy: en bloc pancreatic, portal vein and lymph node resection. Ann Surg. 1977;186:42–50.
5. Appleby LH.The coeliac axis in the expansion of the operation for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1953;6:704–7.