Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5203_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
40
Q. Wang et al.
that inhibiting presynaptic calcium channels reduces the release of excitatory neu­rotransmitters, which may be one of the mechanisms underlying the antiepileptic activity of gabapentin-like calcium channel blockers, but the underlying mechanism is still unclear [222]. Reports have shown that lamotrigine can block N- and P/Q- ­type calcium channels at presynaptic nerve terminals, thereby reducing the release of glutamate to exert its anticonvulsant effect [223225]. In addition, phenobarbital and topiramate can block L-type and N-type calcium currents [215].
1.5.1.3 Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel Enhancement
Potassium ion channels exhibit high heterogeneity and represent a complex class of ion channels. There are multiple subtypes throughout the nervous system, each of which plays different roles in various types of neurons and different brain regions. Therefore, developing drugs targeting specic subtypes is highly challenging. Currently, the only clinically used antiseizure medication that enhances voltage­gated potassium ion channels is retigabine, but many studies are underway to develop novel potassium channel enhancers [226].
Retigabine, acting as a positive allosteric modulator (or opener) of potassium ion channels, is the only clinically approved antiseizure medication that acts on KCNQ channels [227]. It is used to treat focal-onset seizures in adults. Its mechanism of action involves enhancing the voltage-gated potassium channels of the Kv7 subfamily, increas­ing their repolarization rate, and reducing their subsequent inactivation rate [228].

1.5.2 Blocking Excitatory Neurotransmission

A widespread feature of epilepsy is abnormal neuronal excitability, with glutamate being the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the adult human brain. Therefore, in the study of antiseizure medications, researchers have shown signicant interest in drugs affecting glutamate receptor ion channels, aiming to explore the possibility of controlling seizures by blocking glutamate transmission [229, 230].
Glutamate exerts its excitatory effects through ligand-gated ion channels and metabotropic receptor subtypes. Among the postsynaptic ligand-gated ion channels, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors (AMPARs) are crucial for fast excitatory neurotransmission, while N-methyl-D­aspartate (NMDA) receptors (NMDARs) mediate many globally important slow postsynaptic excitatory potentials [231]. However, the function of kainate receptors, although capable of modulating excitability at both presynaptic and postsynaptic sites, remains unclear [232, 233].
Perampanel is a noncompetitive AMPAR antagonist that reduces neuronal excit­ability and synchronous features of epileptic-like activity [234, 235]. It was the rst drug specically approved for controlling seizures by blocking glutamate receptors [236238]. Perampanel binds to the extracellular region of AMPARs, distinct from the glutamate recognition site, in a voltage-independent manner. Its binding induces
1 Overview
41
conformational changes in AMPAR subunits, restricting their ability to convert ago­nist (i.e., glutamate) binding into channel opening. The ultimate result is a reduction in fast excitatory neurotransmission, limiting the generation of seizures and the spread of epileptic discharges [239]. Experimental evidence has shown that perampanel blocks only a small fraction of AMPAR currents, preserving the majority of normal synaptic transmission while sufciently slowing epileptic-like discharges [240].
In addition to perampanel, several other antiseizure medications exert their effects by modulating glutamatergic neurotransmission. Although the exact mecha­nism of action of felbamate is not fully understood, it is speculated to have several potential modes. Its primary antiseizure activity is thought to involve the modula­tion of NMDA receptors, which reduce glutamate transmission. Other effects include enhancing the action of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and inhibiting voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels [215, 241, 242].
Topiramate (TPM) demonstrates broad efcacy in refractory partial and second­ary generalized seizures. It can reduce the excitatory effects of glutamate through AMPA receptors [243]. Additionally, TPM blocks sodium channels, enhances GABA-A receptor-mediated inhibition, inhibits high-voltage calcium channels, and inhibits carbonic anhydrase [244].
1.5.3 Modulation ofNeurotransmitter Release
Because neural functional conduction occurs through electrochemical means, selec­tively reducing the release of neurotransmitters (such as glutamate) from presynap­tic nerve terminals can signicantly inhibit the excitability of neural activity. Some antiepileptic drugs act through this pathway to control seizures.
Levetiracetam and brivaracetam primarily achieve their antiepileptic effects by binding to the synaptic vesicle protein SV2A, reducing the release of neurotransmit­ters [245, 246]. The interaction of levetiracetam with SV2A can decrease the release of synaptic vesicles in rapidly ring neurons during repetitive stimulation. Because levetiracetam restricts the release of glutamate and GABA in an activity-dependent manner, its impact on rapidly ring neurons is most signicant, consistent with the selective inhibition of epileptic-like activity [246249]. However, the exact mecha­nism by which SV2A inhibits vesicle release remains unclear, mainly due to the uncertain physiological role of SV2A despite extensive research.
Brivaracetam is a selective, high-afnity ligand for SV2A with excellent antiepi­leptic properties and rapid onset of action. Experiments have shown that brivarace­tam has a greater afnity for SV2A than does levetiracetam [250]. Animal studies have demonstrated that, compared to levetiracetam, brivaracetam has a 15- to 100­fold greater afnity for SV2A [250, 251]. Additionally, brivaracetam restricts the release of neurotransmitters in an activity-dependent manner [250].
In addition to the abovementioned antiepileptic drugs that bind to SV2A, lamotrigine can also inhibit the release of neurotransmitters from presynaptic termi­nals. However, further experimental data are needed to conrm whether this effect is mediated by SV2A [252].
42
Q. Wang et al.

1.5.4 Improving Neuronal GABAergic Inhibitory Function

The inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) plays a crucial role in the control of neuronal excitability in the mammalian brain. Disruption of GABAergic neurotransmission has been implicated in the pathogenesis or manifes­tation of various neurological disorders, including epilepsy.
GABA, an amino acid, serves as the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. It induces hyperpolarizing inhibition in nearly all neurons, leading to a reduction in neuronal excitability. GABA exerts its effects on GABA receptors located postsynaptically to GABAergic neurons. These GABA receptors are considered the principal inhibitory receptors in the central nervous system and are classied as GABA-A, GABA-B, and GABA-C receptors [253, 254]. GABA-A receptors are ligand-gated ion channels and are members of the classic “Cys-loop” receptor family. GABA-A receptors mediate transient, fast-desensitizing currents (phasic inhibition) [255]. In contrast to GABA-A receptors, GABA-B receptors couple to potassium channels through G proteins, mediating slow hyperpolarization of the postsynaptic membrane [256]. The most critical component in the regulation of epileptic activity within the GABA system is the GABA-A receptor. Mutations in genes, neurodegeneration causing GABA receptor damage, or the use of GABA receptor antagonists can impair GABAergic transmission and induce seizures, while drugs that enhance GABAergic transmission are used to treat epilepsy [257, 258].
Following GABA release, the extracellular GABA concentration is regulated by GABA transporters. GABA transporters on the cell membrane help regulate the extracellular GABA concentration by reabsorbing GABA.They transiently bind with GABA in the extracellular matrix and transport the neurotransmitter to the cytoplasm, reducing GABA levels in the synaptic cleft. Thus, factors affecting pre­synaptic GABA release, postsynaptic GABA receptor function, and GABA reup­take and clearance may contribute to neuronal excitation leading to epileptic seizures, and the development of some antiepileptic drugs is targeted at these pro­cesses. After GABA is reabsorbed, it can be recycled into the readily releasable neurotransmitter pool or converted to succinic semialdehyde by the mitochondrial enzyme GABA transaminase, rendering it inactive.
In the mature brain, the binding of GABA to GABA-A receptors induces an inward ow of Cl level to a low intracellular level. Compared to those in the mature brain, the activa­tion of GABA-A receptors in the immature brain is primarily depolarizing and potentially epileptic due to the ow of chloride ions from a high intracellular level to a low extracellular level [259].
, driven by its concentration gradient from a high extracellular
1.5.4.1 Modulation ofGABA-A Receptors
Some antiepileptic drugs that act on GABA-A receptors are primarily positive allo­steric modulators. In the absence of GABA, they do not activate the receptor [260]. However, when synaptic release of GABA increases, these drugs can enhance
1 Overview
43
inhibitory neurotransmission. Benzodiazepines (such as clonazepam, clorazepate, diazepam, and midazolam) and barbiturates are positive allosteric modulators of GABA-A receptors. Upon binding to the GABA-A receptor, these drugs augment the response to GABA, enhancing chloride ion inux. Barbiturates and benzodiaz­epines exhibit functional distinctions, with the former prolonging the duration of chloride channel opening and the latter increasing the frequency of channel opening [261]. There are reports suggesting that primidone is also a positive allosteric modu­lator of GABA-A receptors [262].
1.5.4.2 Increasing GABA Levels andInhibiting Reuptake andConversion
Löscher etal. reported that the most convincing mechanism through which primi­done exerts its antiepileptic effects is by inuencing the content of GABA at syn­apses, either by increasing GABA neurotransmitter synthesis or release or inhibiting its degradation [263]. Vigabatrin is an irreversible inhibitor of GABA transami­nases. It increases brain GABA levels by inhibiting GABA transaminase, the major enzyme responsible for degrading GABA, without signicantly affecting other enzymes involved in GABA synthesis and metabolism [264]. Tiagabine is a GABA uptake inhibitor. By selectively inhibiting the GAT-1 GABA transporter, this drug blocks the reuptake of GABA by neurons and glial cells, with little activity against GAT-2, GAT-3, or BGT-1 [265]. By slowing the reuptake of synaptic GABA, it prolongs inhibitory postsynaptic potentials [266]. The temporary prolongation of synaptic endogenous GABA release by blocking GABA uptake is a known mecha­nism of action for tiagabine in the treatment of seizures [267].
1.5.4.3 Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) are a class of drugs used to treat certain types of seizures. These enzymes act by inhibiting the activity of carbonic anhydrase, an enzyme involved in regulating acid–base balance in the body. CAIs are most com­monly used to treat certain types of seizures, such as absence seizures and myo­clonic seizures. The exact mechanism by which carbonic anhydrase inhibitors control seizures is not fully understood [268270].
Acetazolamide (ACZ) is a noncompetitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase. Although it has achieved some success as an antiepileptic drug, especially in the treatment of pediatric and chronic epilepsy, its use is limited due to tolerability issues [271]. Acetazolamide induces acidication of intracellular and extracellular environments, thereby activating acid-sensitive ion channels, which may contribute to its antiepileptic effects [268270]. Topiramate (TPM) and zonisamide (ZNS) are effective antiepileptic drugs. Although their antiepileptic mechanisms are often classied as blockades of voltage-gated sodium ion channels, they are also effective nonspecic CA inhibitors. Therefore, their antiepileptic actions are strongly attrib­uted to their carbonic anhydrase inhibition properties [269, 272, 273].
44
Q. Wang et al.

1.5.5 Other Mechanisms

The mechanisms of action of some clinically used antiepileptic drugs may involve multiple pathways, or their mechanisms are not yet fully understood.
Everolimus is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) [274, 275]. As a protein kinase, mTOR plays a crucial role in cell growth, differentiation, and metabolism. Everolimus interferes with the abnormal growth and division of cells by inhibiting the activity of mTOR kinase. Therefore, it is used in some cases for the treatment of epilepsy, particularly in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), helping to reduce the frequency of seizures in TSC patients [274, 276, 277].
Cannabidiol (CBD, marketed as Epidiolex) is a major component of cannabi­noids. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a novel antiepileptic drug in 2018 and is used for the treatment of certain severe pediatric epilepsy syndromes, such as Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and sei­zures associated with TSC [278281]. Despite being the rst cannabinoid prepara­tion approved by the FDA for epilepsy treatment, its exact mechanism of action remains unclear.
Studies have indicated that cannabinoids exert their effects by stimulating two receptors in the endocannabinoid system, cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2). CBD reportedly primarily binds to CB1 receptors on presynaptic neurons. This binding leads to the activation of presynaptic T-type calcium channels and subsequent inhibition of neurotransmitter release [282]. Although most recent studies have suggested that cannabinoids act through CB1 receptors for their antiepileptic effects, recent research has reported that CB2 receptors, which are expressed at lower levels in the central nervous system under normal conditions, can be induced to have higher expression under epi­leptic conditions. Therefore, CB2 receptors might also be a target for antiepilep­tic drugs [283].
The recently FDA-approved drug cenobamate (CNB) is considered a highly effective treatment for focal-onset seizures, achieving seizure control in more than 20% of drug-resistant epilepsy patients. Because CNB was discovered based on phenotype screening, its mechanism of action is not well-understood. However, it is speculated to have a dual mechanism of action, acting as both a voltage-gated sodium channel inhibitor by blocking sodium ion currents [284] and a positive allo­steric modulator of GABA-A receptors, independent of the benzodiazepine binding site [285]. It effectively enhances (tonic) inhibition of hippocampal neurons, which may be a potential molecular mechanism for stabilizing the hippocampal neural circuit in epilepsy. Due to CNB’s terminal half-life of 50–60hours, it can be taken once daily, reducing the frequency of administration and improving patient compli­ance [286].
Ganaxolone (Ztalmy) is a synthetic neuroactive steroid used to treat seizures in patients with cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) deciency disorder (CDD). Its mechanism of action involves serving as a positive allosteric modulator of
1 Overview
45
GABA-A receptors [287]. Ganaxolone operates similarly to the endogenous neuros­teroid allopregnanolone, binding to a unique recognition site on GABAA receptors distinct from the binding sites of benzodiazepine drugs and barbiturate drugs. Upon binding, ganaxolone produces antiepileptic effects by increasing the inhibitory effect of GABA [287, 288].

1.5.6 Conclusion

In this chapter, we have summarized and determined the mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs currently applied in clinical settings. In the early history of human use of antiepileptic drugs, relatively few drug options were available, mak­ing the selection process less challenging. However, with the continuous develop­ment of novel antiepileptic drugs, there are now more than 30 drugs used in clinical practice. While the emergence of new drugs provides more choices for the treatment of epilepsy patients, it also increases the difculty for clinicians in selecting appropriate medications. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of action for each drug, interactions between drugs, how to control side effects, and individualized drug formulation for patients with different etiologies is crucial.
Additionally, despite the continuous development of novel antiepileptic drugs, with reduced drug toxicity and improved patient compliance, neither the rate of seizure control nor the proportion of drug-resistant patients has signicantly decreased [289291].
The reasons for the onset and development of epilepsy are not yet clear, and most antiepileptic drugs are identied through screening in epilepsy animal models. There is currently no treatment that can prevent or terminate epilepsy and its related complications. Therefore, achieving a cure for epilepsy through the application of antiepileptic drugs remains unattainable. Complete control of seizures or addressing the root cause of epilepsy is the ultimate goal of treatment. To achieve this goal, the development of effective and safe antiepileptogenic (AEG), disease-modifying (DM), and/or seizure-preventative treatment drugs has been recognized as a high priority in epilepsy research [292, 293].

References

1. Blume WT.A disease once sacred—a history of the medical understanding of epilepsy. 2001. By Mervyn J.Eadie, Peter F.Bladin. Published by John Libbey & Company Limited. 248 pages. C$61.45 approx. Can J Neurol Sci / J Can Des Sci Neurol. 2002;29:298–9.
2. Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, Bogacz A, Cross JH, Elger CE, etal. ILAE ofcial report: a practical clinical denition of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014;55:475–82.
3. Fisher RS, van Emde BW, Blume W, Elger C, Genton P, Lee P, etal. Epileptic seizures and epilepsy: denitions proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE). Epilepsia. 2005;46:470–2.
46
4. Wang X, Li S.Refractory status epilepticus: diagnosis and treatment. Springer; 2017.
5. Devinsky O, Vezzani A, O’Brien TJ, Jette N, Scheffer IE, de Curtis M, etal. Epilepsy. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2018;4:18024.
6. Zuberi SM, Wirrell E, Yozawitz E, Wilmshurst JM, Specchio N, Riney K, etal. ILAE clas­sication and denition of epilepsy syndromes with onset in neonates and infants: position statement by the ILAE task force on nosology and denitions. Epilepsia. 2022;63:1349–97.
7. Sidiropoulou K, Diamantis A, Magiorkinis E.Hallmarks in 18th- and 19th-century epilepsy research. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;18:151–61.
8. Gibbs FA, Gibbs EL, Lennox WG.Epilepsy: a paroxysmal cerebral dysrhythmia. Epilepsy Behav. 2002;3:395–401.
9. Arnautova EN, Nesmeianova TN.A proposed international classication of epileptic sei­zures. Epilepsia. 1964;5:297–306.
10. Gastaut H. Clinical and electroencephalographical classication of epileptic seizures. Epilepsia. 1970;11:102–13.
11. Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classication of epileptic seizures. From the commission on classication and terminology of the international league against epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1981;22:489–501.
12. Blume WT, Lüders HO, Mizrahi E, Tassinari C, van Emde Boas W, Engel JJ.Glossary of descriptive terminology for ictal semiology: report of the ILAE task force on classication and terminology. Epilepsia. 2001;42:1212–8.
13. Berg AT, Berkovic SF, Brodie MJ, Buchhalter J, Cross JH, van Emde Boas W, etal. Revised terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies: report of the ILAE commission on classication and terminology, 2005–2009. Epilepsia. 2010;51:676–85.
14. Fisher RS, Cross JH, French JA, Higurashi N, Hirsch E, Jansen FE, etal. Operational clas­sication of seizure types by the international league against epilepsy: position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classication and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58:522–30.
15. Lüders HO, Burgess R, Noachtar S.Expanding the international classication of seizures to provide localization information. Neurology. 1993;43:1650–5.
16. Lüders H, Acharya J, Baumgartner C, Benbadis S, Bleasel A, Burgess R, etal. Semiological seizure classication. Epilepsia. 1998;39:1006–13.
17. Lüders H, Vaca GF-B, Akamatsu N, Amina S, Arzimanoglou A, Baumgartner C, et al. Classication of paroxysmal events and the four-dimensional epilepsy classication system. Epileptic Disord. 2019;21:1–29.
18. Scheffer IE, Berkovic S, Capovilla G, Connolly MB, French J, Guilhoto L, etal. ILAE clas­sication of the epilepsies: position paper of the ILAE commission for classication and terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58:512–21.
19. Kaculini CM, Tate-Looney AJ, Sei A. The history of epilepsy: from ancient mystery to modern misconception. Cureus. 2021;13:e13953.
20. Pitkänen A, Immonen R.Epilepsy related to traumatic brain injury. Neurother J Am Soc Exp Neurother. 2014;11:286–96.
21. Lin C-H, Hsieh C-L. Chinese herbal medicine for treating epilepsy. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:682821.
22. Hassen G, Belete G, Carrera KG, Iriowen RO, Araya H, Alemu T, etal. Clinical implica­tions of herbal supplements in conventional medical practice: a US perspective. Cureus. 2022;14:e26893.
23. Friedman D, Sirven JI.Historical perspective on the medical use of cannabis for epilepsy: ancient times to the 1980s. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70:298–301.
24. Reddy DS.Therapeutic and clinical foundations of cannabidiol therapy for difcult-to-treat seizures in children and adults with refractory epilepsies. Exp Neurol. 2023;359:114237.
25. Brodie MJ.Antiepileptic drug therapy the story so far. Seizure. 2010;19:650–5.
26. Löscher W, Klein P.The pharmacology and clinical efcacy of Antiseizure medications: from bromide salts to Cenobamate and beyond. CNS Drugs. 2021;35:935–63.
27. Shorvon SD. Drug treatment of epilepsy in the century of the ILAE: the rst 50 years, 1909–1958. Epilepsia. 2009;50(Suppl 3):69–92.
Q. Wang et al.
1 Overview
28. Ryan M, Baumann RJ. Use and monitoring of bromides in epilepsy treatment. Pediatr Neurol. 1999;21:523–8.
29. Korinthenberg R, Burkart P, Woele C, Moenting JS, Ernst JP.Pharmacology, efcacy, and tolerability of potassium bromide in childhood epilepsy. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:414–8.
30. Brodie MJ, Kwan P.Current position of phenobarbital in epilepsy and its future. Epilepsia. 2012;53(Suppl 8):40–6.
31. Perucca E. Antiepileptic drugs: evolution of our knowledge and changes in drug trials. Epileptic Disord. 2019;21:319–29.
32. Löscher W. Animal models of seizures and epilepsy: past, present, and future role for the discovery of Antiseizure drugs. Neurochem Res. 2017;42:1873–88.
33. Rho JM, White HS. Brief history of anti-seizure drug development. Epilepsia Open. 2018;3:114–9.
34. Tomson T, Battino D, Perucca E.Valproic acid after ve decades of use in epilepsy: time to reconsider the indications of a time-honoured drug. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:210–8.
35. Gastaut H. Clinical and electroencephalographical classication of epileptic seizures. Epilepsia. 1969;10(Suppl):2–13.
36. Gastaut H. Classication of the epilepsies. Proposal for an international classication. Epilepsia. 1969;10(Suppl):14–21.
37. Mattson RH, Cramer JA, Collins JF, Smith DB, Delgado-Escueta AV, Browne TR, etal. Comparison of carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and primidone in partial and sec­ondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:145–51.
38. Shields WD, Saslow E.Myoclonic, atonic, and absence seizures following institution of car­bamazepine therapy in children. Neurology. 1983;33:1487–9.
39. Shorvon SD, Chadwick D, Galbraith AW, Reynolds EH.One drug for epilepsy. Br Med J. 1978;1:474–6.
40. Shorvon SD, Reynolds EH.Unnecessary polypharmacy for epilepsy. Br Med J. 1977;1:1635–7.
41. Buchthal F, Svensmark O.Aspects of the pharmacology of phenytoin (dilantin) and pheno­barbital relevant to their dosage in the treatment of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1960;1:373–84.
42. Buchthal F, Svensmark O.Serum concentrations of diphenylhydantoin (phenytoin) and phe­nobarbital and their relation to therapeutic and toxic effects. Psychiatr Neurol Neurochir. 1971;74:117–36.
43. Lund L.Anticonvulsant effect of diphenylhydantoin relative to plasma levels. A prospec­tive three-year study in ambulant patients with generalized epileptic seizures. Arch Neurol. 1974;31:289–94.
44. Richens A, Dunlop A.Serum-phenytoin levels in management of epilepsy. Lancet (London, England). 1975;2:247–8.
45. Pippenger CE, Penry JK, White BG, Daly DD, Buddington R.Interlaboratory variability in determination of plasma antiepileptic drug concentrations. Arch Neurol. 1976;33:351–5.
46. Crawford P, Chadwick D. A comparative study of progabide, valproate, and placebo as add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;49:1251–7.
47. Leppik IE, Dreifuss FE, Porter R, Bowman T, Santilli N, Jacobs M, etal. A controlled study of progabide in partial seizures: methodology and results. Neurology. 1987;37:963–8.
48. Munoz SJ, Fariello R, Maddrey WC.Submassive hepatic necrosis associated with the use of progabide: a GABA receptor agonist. Dig Dis Sci. 1988;33:375–80.
49. Klein BD, Jacobson CA, Metcalf CS, Smith MD, Wilcox KS, Hampson AJ, etal. Evaluation of Cannabidiol in animal seizure models by the Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program (ETSP). Neurochem Res. 2017;42:1939–48.
50. Wilcox KS, West PJ, Metcalf CS.The current approach of the Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program contract site for identifying improved therapies for the treatment of pharmacoresis­tant seizures in epilepsy. Neuropharmacology. 2020;166:107811.
51. Pernici CD, Mensah JA, Dahle EJ, Johnson KJ, Handy L, Buxton L, etal. Development of an antiseizure drug screening platform for Dravet syndrome at the NINDS contract site for the Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program. Epilepsia. 2021;62:1665–76.
47
48
52. Metcalf CS, Vanegas F, Underwood T, Johnson K, West PJ, Smith MD, etal. Screening of prototype antiseizure and anti-inammatory compounds in the Theiler’s murine encephalo­myelitis virus model of epilepsy. Epilepsia Open. 2022;7:46–58.
53. Kehne JH, Klein BD, Raeissi S, Sharma S.The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program (ETSP). Neurochem Res. 2017;42:1894–903.
54. Löscher W.Single-target versus multi-target drugs versus combinations of drugs with mul­tiple targets: preclinical and clinical evidence for the treatment or prevention of epilepsy. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:730257.
55. Quintero JE, Dooley DJ, Pomerleau F, Huettl P, Gerhardt GA.Amperometric measurement of glutamate release modulation by gabapentin and pregabalin in rat neocortical slices: role of voltage-sensitive Ca2+ α2δ-1 subunit. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;338:240–5.
56. Wolf P.New antiepileptic drugs already registered. Epilepsia. 1994;35(Suppl 5):S22–4.
57. Perucca E.What clinical trial designs have been used to test antiepileptic drugs and do we need to change them? Epileptic Disord. 2012;14:124–31.
58. Chen Z, Brodie MJ, Liew D, Kwan P.Treatment outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy treated with established and new antiepileptic drugs: a 30-year longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:279–86.
59. Perucca E, Brodie MJ, Kwan P, Tomson T. 30 years of second-generation antiseizure medica­tions: impact and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:544–56.
60. Perucca E.Clinically relevant drug interactions with antiepileptic drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;61:246–55.
61. Zaccara G, Perucca E.Interactions between antiepileptic drugs, and between antiepileptic drugs and other drugs. Epileptic Disord. 2014;16:409–31.
62. Brodie MJ, Mintzer S, Pack AM, Gidal BE, Vecht CJ, Schmidt D.Enzyme induction with antiepileptic drugs: cause for concern? Epilepsia. 2013;54:11–27.
63. Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Perucca E, etal. Comparative risk of major congenital malformations with eight different antiepileptic drugs: a prospective cohort study of the EURAP registry. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:530–8.
64. Tomson T, Battino D, Perucca E.Teratogenicity of antiepileptic drugs. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019;32:246–52.
65. Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Perucca E, etal. Declining malfor­mation rates with changed antiepileptic drug prescribing: An observational study. Neurology. 2019;93:e831–40.
66. Cohen JM, Alvestad S, Cesta CE, Bjørk M-H, Leinonen MK, Nørgaard M, etal. Comparative safety of Antiseizure medication monotherapy for major malformations. Ann Neurol. 2023;93:551–62.
67. Bjørk M-H, Zoega H, Leinonen MK, Cohen JM, Dreier JW, Furu K, etal. Association of Prenatal Exposure to Antiseizure medication with risk of autism and intellectual disability. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:672–81.
68. McCluskey G, Kinney MO, Russell A, Smithson WH, Parsons L, Morrison PJ, et al. Zonisamide safety in pregnancy: data from the UK and Ireland epilepsy and pregnancy reg­ister. Seizure. 2021;91:311–5.
69. Elkommos S, Mula M.Current and future pharmacotherapy options for drug-resistant epi­lepsy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2022;23:2023–34.
70. Ackermann S, Wilmshurst JM.Medical management of children with epilepsy. Minerva Pediatr. 2015;67:47–74.
71. Burakgazi E, French JA.Treatment of epilepsy in adults. Epileptic Disord. 2016;18:228–39.
72. Cheng JY, French JA.Intelligent use of antiepileptic drugs is benecial to patients. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31:169–75.
73. Jehi L, Jette N, Kwon C-S, Josephson CB, Burneo JG, Cendes F, etal. Timing of referral to evaluate for epilepsy surgery: expert consensus recommendations from the surgical therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2022;63:2491–506.
Q. Wang et al.
1 Overview
74. Kossoff EH, Zupec-Kania BA, Auvin S, Ballaban-Gil KR, Christina Bergqvist AG, Blackford R, etal. Optimal clinical management of children receiving dietary therapies for epilepsy: updated recommendations of the International Ketogenic Diet Study Group. Epilepsia Open. 2018;3:175–92.
75. Ryvlin P, Rheims S, Hirsch LJ, Sokolov A, Jehi L.Neuromodulation in epilepsy: state-of-the­art approved therapies. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:1038–47.
76. Gambardella A, Tinuper P, Acone B, Bonanni P, Coppola G, Perucca E.Selection of antisei­zure medications for rst add-on use: a consensus paper. Epilepsy Behav. 2021;122:108087.
77. Verrotti A, Tambucci R, Di Francesco L, Pavone P, Iapadre G, Altobelli E, etal. The role of polytherapy in the management of epilepsy: suggestions for rational antiepileptic drug selec­tion. Expert Rev Neurother. 2020;20:167–73.
78. Patsalos PN, Berry DJ, Bourgeois BFD, Cloyd JC, Glauser TA, Johannessen SI, et al. Antiepileptic drugs–best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia. 2008;49:1239–76.
79. Asadi-Pooya AA, Beniczky S, Rubboli G, Sperling MR, Rampp S, Perucca E.A pragmatic algorithm to select appropriate antiseizure medications in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2020;61:1668–77.
80. Håkansson S, Zelano J.Big data analysis of ASM retention rates and expert ASM algorithm: a comparative study. Epilepsia. 2022;63:1553–62.
81. de Jong J, Cutcutache I, Page M, Elmoufti S, Dilley C, Fröhlich H, etal. Towards realiz­ing the vision of precision medicine: AI based prediction of clinical drug response. Brain. 2021;144:1738–50.
82. Hakeem H, Feng W, Chen Z, Choong J, Brodie MJ, Fong SL, etal. Development and valida­tion of a deep learning model for predicting treatment response in patients with newly diag­nosed epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:986–96.
83. Perucca E, Wiebe S.Not all that glitters is gold: a guide to the critical interpretation of drug trials in epilepsy. Epilepsia Open. 2016;1:9–21.
84. Perucca E. From clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs to treatment. Epilepsia Open. 2018;3:220–30.
85. Sourbron J, Auvin S, Arzimanoglou A, Cross JH, Hartmann H, Pressler R, etal. Medical treatment in infants and young children with epilepsy: off-label use of antiseizure medi­cations. Survey report of ILAE task force medical therapies in children. Epilepsia Open. 2023;8:77–89.
86. Piccenna L, O’Dwyer R, Leppik I, Beghi E, Giussani G, Costa C, etal. Management of epilepsy in older adults: a critical review by the ILAE task force on epilepsy in the elderly. Epilepsia. 2023;64:567–85.
87. Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Guerreiro C, Kälviäinen R, etal. Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efcacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. 2013;54:551–63.
88. Guerrini R, Balestrini S, Wirrell EC, Walker MC.Monogenic epilepsies: disease mecha­nisms, clinical phenotypes, and targeted therapies. Neurology. 2021;97:817–31.
89. Stirling RE, Maturana MI, Karoly PJ, Nurse ES, McCutcheon K, Grayden DB, etal. Seizure forecasting using a novel sub-scalp ultra-long term EEG monitoring system. Front Neurol. 2021;12:713794.
90. Lehnertz K, Bröhl T, Wrede R von. Epileptic-network-based prediction and control of sei­zures in humans. Neurobiol Dis. 2023;181:106098.
91. Cook M, Murphy M, Bulluss K, D’Souza W, Plummer C, Priest E, etal. Anti-seizure therapy with a long-term, implanted intra-cerebroventricular delivery system for drug-resistant epi­lepsy: a rst-in-man study. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;22:100326.
92. Knowles JK, Helbig I, Metcalf CS, Lubbers LS, Isom LL, Demarest S, etal. Precision medi­cine for genetic epilepsy on the horizon: recent advances, present challenges, and suggestions for continued progress. Epilepsia. 2022;63:2461–75.
49