Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5203_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
4 Clinical Application ofAnti-seizure Medication asDrug Therapy
421
[145]. Complications following cranial trauma, such as hypoxia, increased intracra­nial pressure, hypotension, ischemia, brain edema, intracranial hemorrhage, elec­trolyte imbalances, or infections, can precipitate symptomatic seizures, mostly occurring within weeks after trauma [137, 140]. Additionally, alterations in inam­matory markers, blood–brain barrier integrity, astrocytes, glucose metabolism, and metabolic dysregulation have been implicated in the pathogenesis of posttraumatic seizures [147150]. For example, posttraumatic inammation triggers toll-like receptor-1 (TLR-1) expression elevation in the hippocampi of rodent models, lead­ing to protein kinase B (Akt) phosphorylation and activation of the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways [151]; HMBP-1 protein expression activates the MAPK/ERK 1/2 pathway [152]; and NMDA recep­tor activation increases neuronal excitability [153], among others.
Pathophysiological Mechanisms ofPosttraumatic Epilepsy
Research has suggested that an increased risk of delayed-onset seizures is associ­ated with early-onset seizures; however, an increased risk of PTE is not a direct consequence of early seizure activity [137, 140, 154]. Population-based studies ana- lyzing large samples have shown that the increased risk of PTE following TBI may be attributed to various factors, including the occurrence of cerebral contusion or hematoma, particularly subdural hematomas and skull fractures, or age [140]. Cerebral contusions, lacerations resulting from direct or indirect traumatic brain injury, and compression-induced brain trauma can evolve into epilepsy after a period of asymptomatic latency, which can range from months to years and is dependent on the individual [128]. Studies have indicated that following TBI, injured brain tissue undergoes cellular apoptosis and long-term remodeling of neu­ral circuits over time, including inhibition and apoptosis of GABAergic neurons and enhanced excitability of glutamatergic neurons. Ultimately, these changes lead to an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters, increasing the risk of spontaneous epileptic seizures [155157]. There is also evidence suggesting that the deposition of iron-containing hemosiderin, the formation of iron-free radicals, and iron-related necrosis are involved in epileptogenesis [158]. Following the advancement of genetic testing technologies, the role of genetics in PTE is gradu­ally gaining attention, especially with the discovery of certain genes that serve as biomarkers for predicting the occurrence of PTE following TBI.Genes such as SLC1A3, SLC1A1, ADK, NT5E, IL1B, GAD1, MTHFR, ADORA1, and APOE have been extensively reported to inuence various pathological and physiological processes, including stress response, regulation of biomass, metabolic processes, signaling pathways, responses to external stimuli and their regulation, and cellular localization, among others, thus facilitating the onset of epilepsy [159]. The rela­tionship between the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signaling pathway and PTE is signicant. Changes of decreased GABAergic activity and increased gluta­mate content may be associated with microRNA regulation, indicating the involve­ment of epigenetic regulation in PTE [160]. Currently, mechanistic studies on
422
L. Zhou and Z. Chen
epilepsy are primarily based on animal experiments rather than specically target­ing traumatic epilepsy. Animal models for studying PTE mainly include uid per­cussion models, controlled cortical impact models, liquid impact models, cortical undercut models, impact acceleration models, penetrating brain injury models, and canine models of PTE [157, 161164]. Based on uid percussion model studies, selective apoptosis of interneurons in the dentate gyrus and partial survival of mossy bers may lead to sustained granule cell hyperexcitability [165]. Recent studies have increasingly shown that a severe uid impact leading to focal TBI can trigger spontaneous epileptic seizures [157, 166]. Seizures originate from the lesion site and progress over time with worsening clinical and electrophysiological symptoms [167, 168]. Controlled cortical impact models involve creating a focal brain contu­sion using an impactor controller, allowing for sustained or reproducible outcomes without diffuse brain injury. Studies have shown that damage to the dentate gyrus leads to mossy ber sprouting and structural reorganization, resulting in increased spontaneous excitability [169, 170]. Rat models of penetrating brain injury better simulate the conditions of TBI, but whether this model can produce delayed-onset epileptic seizures remains uncertain [157]. The cortical undercut model involves transverse transection of the white matter with a needle, resulting in isolation of a small portion of the cortex, and monitoring seizure-like activity in brain slices. Increased axonal sprouting adjacent to pyramidal cells is associated with increased excitatory connections [171]. Recent studies have shown reduced GABA output from fast-spiking neurons in the cortex [172]. Early application of tetrodotoxin after trauma delays action potentials and prevents induced or noninduced epileptoid activity in brain slices, suggesting that posttraumatic epilepsy can be an event­dependent process [173]. Administration of tetrodotoxin within 3days of trauma can prevent delayed epilepsy in PTE animal models [174]. The occurrence of epi­leptogenesis overlaps with the recovery process after injury, suggesting common underlying mechanisms, including neuroregeneration, axonal sprouting, and event dependence [155]. Therefore, disease-modifying agents and anti-seizure drugs may have both positive and negative effects on recovery and epileptogenicity. Limited research suggests that anti-seizure drugs, including ramacemide, topiramate, pirace­tam, and levetiracetam, have no benecial or harmful effects on recovery following TBI [155].
Risk Factors forPosttraumatic Seizures
Posttraumatic epilepsy has a signicant impact on quality of life due to its tendency to occur following brain injury. Therefore, it is crucial to predict whether patients will develop PTE after TBI.Current research indicates that several factors can serve as risk factors for PTE, including TBI severity, intracranial hemorrhage, early post­traumatic seizures, age, and genetics [175].
Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury: Studies have suggested that the risk of PTE
increases with TBI severity. TBI severity primarily depends on the duration of
4 Clinical Application ofAnti-seizure Medication asDrug Therapy
423
consciousness loss or amnesia and structural brain damage [137]. Mild TBI refers to a lack of skull fractures or consciousness loss, or amnesia lasting 5minutes; moderate TBI involves skull fractures or other injuries, conscious­ness loss, or amnesia lasting 30min to 24 h without meeting the criteria for severe TBI; severe TBI indicates evidence of cerebral contusion, intracerebral hematoma, or consciousness loss or amnesia lasting more than 24h [137]. The risks of developing PTE after mild, moderate, and severe TBI increase by 1.5,
2.9, and 17.2 times, respectively [137]. In 2017, the US Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center introduced new grading criteria for TBI severity, emphasiz­ing the importance of imaging examinations while dening the duration of con­sciousness loss and posttraumatic amnesia [176].
Intracranial Hemorrhage: Studies have indicated that traumatic intracranial
hemorrhage increases the risk of posttraumatic epilepsy by 30% [128].
Early Posttraumatic Seizures: Early posttraumatic seizures are associated with
PTE.After experiencing the rst delayed-onset nonprovoked seizure, 86% of patients experience a second seizure within 2years, with the highest probability observed in patients who have undergone focal brain trauma or coma for more than 7days [140]. Studies have suggested that the correlation between them is related to TBI severity. In mild TBI, early posttraumatic seizures do not increase the risk of PTE, but in moderate and severe TBI, early posttraumatic seizures increase the risk of PTE by 25% [128].
Age: Research has indicated that although children under 5years of age are more
likely to experience seizures within 1h of mild TBI, age cannot be used as a predictor of delayed-onset seizures in children with TBI.Additionally, individu­als over 65years of age are more likely to experience severe TBI, which is cor­related with delayed-onset seizures [128].
Genetics: The role of genetics as a hereditary biomarker for posttraumatic epi-
lepsy has garnered considerable attention in recent years, leading to conicting conclusions [159, 177]. However, with the continuous advancement of genetic technologies and their gradual integration into clinical practice, genetic poly­morphisms are promising biological markers.
4.3.2.4 Selection ofAnti-seizure Medications forPosttraumatic Seizures
andEpilepsy
Drug Selection for Posttraumatic Seizures: Seizures following TBI are presumed
to be predominantly focal in nature, but seizures can easily generalize, present­ing early as symptoms of generalized seizures within the rst week after TBI, and early clinical seizures (electrical seizures) within the rst week are also very common [127]. Studies have shown that 20% of posttraumatic seizures can prog­ress to status epilepticus, especially in pediatric patients. Continuous EEG moni­toring of patients with severe TBI has revealed that 22% of patients experience seizures within the rst week, presenting as generalized tonic–clonic seizures or
424
L. Zhou and Z. Chen
myoclonus, with over 50% of patients having only EEG-detected electrical sei­zures [127].
Following the occurrence of the rst posttraumatic seizure, consideration should be given to whether seizure prophylaxis should be initiated during the acute phase. Because patients remain in the acute phase of TBI within the rst week after TBI, management of the patient’s overall internal environment and treatment of syndromes such as brain edema and brain contusion take prece­dence, while the use of ASMs for prophylaxis of acute-phase seizures following TBI is controversial. The controversy revolves around whether ASMs can effec­tively prevent seizures during the acute phase and whether the side effects of ASMs interfere with recovery after TBI.Meta-analyses have shown that phe­nytoin and carbamazepine have a preventive effect on early posttraumatic sei­zures. The Cochrane Database includes six studies demonstrating the prophylactic effect of ASMs on early posttraumatic seizures. Among 100 TBI patients, 10 patients may not experience early posttraumatic seizures within 1week [178,
179]. However, studies have shown that controlling seizures is not associated
with reduced mortality or neurological disability, nor does it reduce the risk of delayed-onset seizures.
Based on prospective research results, the American Neurological Association has issued recommendations for the prophylactic use of ASMs in adult TBI patients [180, 181]. The current recommendation is short-term use of phenytoin sodium for prophylaxis in adult patients with severe TBI to prevent early post­traumatic seizures, while no recommendations are available for pediatric patients with severe TBI.Phenytoin can be administered intravenously as early as possi­ble after TBI, but data on this topic are limited. Levetiracetam can also be used in similar circumstances, with several studies showing similar efcacy to that of phenytoin and fewer side effects [171, 179, 182]. Although there are no guideline recommendations, level-three evidence suggests that prophylactic use of phe­nytoin sodium reduces the risk of early posttraumatic seizures in pediatric patients with severe TBI [183185]. However, there is currently no evidence to support the benet of using ASMs after 7days posttrauma [181]. Steroids used after TBI do not prevent delayed-onset posttraumatic seizures, and early steroid use has been shown to increase epileptic activity [186]. In 2017, the Chinese Neurosurgical Society’s Neurotrauma Professional Group published the Expert Consensus on the Prevention and Treatment of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy in China, which also recommended anti-seizure prophylaxis for early seizure-like events in high-risk populations after trauma. This expert consensus has been con­troversial; the controversy centers on whether the 7-day prophylactic use of ASMs is intended to prevent seizures within 7days after trauma rather than pre­venting delayed-onset seizures after 7 days, although its target population includes both early- and late-stage high-risk populations for posttraumatic sei­zures [187].
Drug Selection for Posttraumatic Seizures: Currently, there are no international
guidelines recommending prophylactic drug treatment for delayed-onset post­traumatic seizures. Previous studies have shown that phenytoin and barbiturates
4 Clinical Application ofAnti-seizure Medication asDrug Therapy
425
are effective in preventing delayed-onset seizures after trauma [188]. Therefore, it is common in clinical practice to prescribe medications to patients with severe TBI or those who experienced posttraumatic seizures within 1week, with a med­ication duration of 6months or longer [189]. However, subsequent randomized, double-blind, prospective evaluations of anti-seizure drugs, such as phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and sodium valproate, have been shown to be ineffective for preventing seizures [180, 190, 191].
Compared to patients who develop seizures more than a year after TBI, patients who develop seizures within 1year after injury are more likely to achieve seizure remission after medication [192]. However, studies have not demon­strated a relationship between the occurrence of the rst seizure and medication efcacy [141]. Research has shown that a high seizure frequency in the rst year can predict the severity of future seizures and the intractability to medication, similar to other symptomatic seizures [141, 193]. Seizures that occur secondary to severe traumatic brain injury and seizures subject to ineffective early treat­ment tend to be refractory to medication [194]. The probability of spontaneous seizure remission is low, but for some selected patients (normal EEG, no imaging lesions, good initial treatment response, no seizures for at least 2years), dose reduction is feasible.
Development of New Anti-seizure Medications for Posttraumatic Seizures: In
recent years, with the deepening understanding of the mechanisms of PTE and the use of animal models of PTE, there have been growing advancements in the development of new anti-seizure drugs for the treatment of PTE.
Studies have shown that atipamezole, a selective α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, or the cannabinoid receptor 1 antagonist SR141716A has anti-seizure effects on a lateral uid percussion brain injury seizure model in animals. Treatment with atipamezole starting 7days after traumatic brain injury reduced the susceptibility of pentylentetrazol-exposed rats to seizures in 14weeks after treatment, but it did not prevent the development of seizures. SR141716A admin­istered as a single dose 2minutes after traumatic brain injury or starting 30min­utes after traumatic brain injury and continuing for 9 weeks, did not have anti-seizure effects. Mechanistic studies have shown that the anti-seizure effect of atipamezole is mainly mediated through its effects on α2-adrenergic receptor subtypes, and animals carrying the Adra2A gene mutation encoding the N79P amino acid substitution exhibit anti-seizure effects following traumatic brain injury. On the other hand, the use of the receptor subtype-specic antagonist ORM-12741 to block α
2c- adrenergic receptors did not improve the prognoses of
traumatic brain injury patients [195].
Studies have shown that Minozac, an anti-inammatory agent, can prevent
increased susceptibility to seizures in a “double hit” mouse model of closed skull traumatic brain injury and electroshock-induced seizures, mainly by inhibiting the upregulation of proinammatory cytokines [196].
Another study used an rpFPI rat model of lateral uid percussion injury to inves-
tigate whether brivaracetam could prevent and treat posttraumatic epilepsy. Three
426
months later, rats treated with brivaracetam starting 30minutes, 4h, and 8h after traumatic brain injury showed a 38% reduction in the overall seizure occurrence rate, a 59% reduction in seizure frequency, a 67% reduction in seizure duration, and a 45% reduction in the proportion of spreading seizures, demonstrating good anti­seizure properties and providing support for clinical trials of brivaracetam and other SV2A-targeting drugs for the prevention of posttraumatic epilepsy in humans [197].
L. Zhou and Z. Chen
4.3.3 Selection ofAnti-seizure Medication forBrain Tumor-Associated Epilepsy
Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a group of clinical symptoms caused by the abnormal ring of neuronal cells around a lesion due to an intracranial tumor itself or its occupying effect; these symptoms include changes in seizure consciousness level, limb movements, limb sensations, autonomic nervous system functions, and other disorders. According to the ILAE International Epilepsy Cause Classication System updated by the ILAE in 2017, it is a structural cause. BTRE is a clinical symptom of disease progression in patients with brain tumors and can appear either at the beginning of the disease or after surgery, chemoradiotherapy, or other treatments.
4.3.3.1 Epidemiology
The epidemiology, histological subtypes, clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of malignant and nonmalignant CNS tumors are diverse and vary widely. The inci­dence of primary brain and other central nervous system tumors is estimated to be
23.8 per 100,000 people [198]. Malignant tumors account for 30% of central ner-
vous system tumors. Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults, accounting for approximately 25% of the total incidence of tumors and approxi­mately 80% of the incidence of malignant tumors of the central nervous sys­tem [199].
Epileptic seizures often occur in patients with brain tumors, usually reaching a prevalence of 20–60%, and epileptic seizures can be the rst clinical symptom in patients with low-grade gliomas [200]. Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults, and 40–70% of patients with glioma have one or more seizures dur­ing the course of the disease. When epilepsy recurs or even worsens in patients whose brain tumors are actively treated, this may indicate that the tumor has pro­gressed or relapsed, and it is also an important clinical indicator for determining whether the survival and prognoses of brain tumor patients are optimistic.
4 Clinical Application ofAnti-seizure Medication asDrug Therapy
427
4.3.3.2 Pathophysiological Mechanism
The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of BTRE are not well understood. Mechanical compression, tumor vascularization, oxygen demand imbalance, inammatory processes and neurotransmitter imbalance play major roles in the development of epilepsy in brain tumor patients [201].
Mechanical compression may cause ischemia and metabolic changes, followed by disruption of the blood–brain barrier, leading to a greater risk of seizures. The blood vessel supply of brain tumors is often unbalanced and unable to meet the oxygen needs of the tumor and the peri-tumor area, resulting in tissue hypoxia; this, in turn, leads to acidosis, glial swelling, and tissue damage. High-grade gliomas cause hemorrhage, necrosis, and gliosis of the surrounding cortex due to their rapid growth. These factors contribute to epilepsy in patients with brain tumors [202].
The incidence of seizures is inversely related to the rate of tumor growth, possi­bly because slow-growing tumors are more likely to present with epilepsy as the rst symptom [203]. In low-grade gliomas, their slow growth into the surrounding brain tissue can separate and invade the cortical–subcortical local and distal net­works, leading to epileptogenesis. Changes in the balance of neurotransmitters lead to epileptogenic generation of the tumor itself and tissues near the lesion, which means that the “epileptogenic region” includes peritumoral tissues [204]. Therefore, even complete removal of the brain tumor does not necessarily mean that the epilep­togenic area is also removed, as BTRE may be produced by surrounding tissue.
The effect of neurotransmitter imbalance on the development of epilepsy in BTRE patients, particularly a reduction in inhibitory GABAergic neurotransmis­sion and an increase in excitatory glutamatergic synaptic input, has been demon­strated in multiple preclinical and clinical studies [205]. Studies have shown that glioma and breast cancer BMSs can integrate into neuronal circuits. Gliomas can form microtubules, which are thin tubes with membranes that resemble the axons and dendritic growth of developing neurons. On the surfaces of these microtubules, functional synapses (glial synapses) between neurons and glioma cells signal via postsynaptic currents mediated by alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazol.
4-propionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptors [206, 207]. The interaction between neurons and brain tumor cells implies that seizures may promote brain tumor progression and, conversely, that AMPA glutamate receptors are a potential therapeutic target for treating tumors and BTRE [208]. AMPA receptor antagonist drugs may have dual effects on reducing seizures and tumor growth.
It has been reported that the risk of seizures is greater for brain tumors located in the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes [209] than for those located in the occipital lobe. More than four brain metastatic sites; high-risk sites for metastasis, such as the frontal, parietal, temporal, or occipital cortices; or melanoma as the primary tumor, are risk factors for BTRE [210]. In low-grade gliomas, lesions involving the left premotor area are more likely to develop into bilateral tonic–clonic seizures [203].
428
L. Zhou and Z. Chen
Among the molecular markers of great importance for treatment decisions in brain glioma patients, isocitrate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 or 2 (IDH 1/2) is the only known marker that has been reported to be associated with increased seizure rates. Several clinical studies have shown that IDH 1/2 mutations increase the risk of seizures before and around brain tumors [201]. IDH 1/2 mutation leads to a loss of the ability of IDH to catalyze the conversion of isocitric acid to α-ketoglutaric acid and further leads to an increase in the ability of IDH to catalyze the reduction of α-ketoglutaric acid to 2-hydroxyglutaric acid. This mechanism leads to the accu­mulation of 2-hydroxyglutaric acid, which has structural similarities to glutamate and is able to activate the NMDA receptor, thus acting as a glutamate agonist. Higher glutamate levels lead to a greater probability of seizures. This activation mechanism may explain the epileptogenic potential of IDH mutations.
4.3.3.3 Anti-seizure Medication Therapy forBrain
Tumor-Associated Epilepsy
Primary Prevention of Epilepsy: Recent studies have shown that patients with
newly diagnosed brain tumors who have not experienced seizures do not benet
from anti-seizure medications [211]. Primary prevention is unlikely to be effec-
tive in improving progression-free survival or reducing the incidence of a rst
seizure within 6months of diagnosis. Therefore, prophylactic use of anti-seizure
medication is not recommended for patients with brain tumors who do not expe-
rience concomitant seizures [212]. Secondary Prevention of Epilepsy: In patients with brain tumors, the occurrence
of the rst seizure indicates a diagnosis of epilepsy. Therefore, according to the
general recommendations of the ILAE, ASM treatment usually starts after the
rst seizure.
Currently, tumor histology, grade, location, and molecular markers have no inu­ence on ASM selection [213]. Several clinical studies have shown the antitumor effects of valproic acid (VPA) and levetiracetam in patients with glioblastoma [201]; however, a comprehensive meta-analysis of four prospective trials did not conrm this effect [214]. In vitro studies have shown that perampanel has good antitumor activity, but it has not been found to slow tumor progression in rat models. There are few clinical data on the potential antitumor activity of perampanel [215]. Currently, therefore, ASMs for treatment of BTRE should be selected based on their pharma­cokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, tolerability, and side effects rather than considering their possible antitumor effects. It is agreed that non-enzyme-induced ASMs are superior to enzyme-induced ASMs to avoid changes that interfere with the pharmacokinetics of antitumor drugs and other drugs (e.g., dexamethasone).
Patients with brain tumors are susceptible to the neurological side effects of ASM, particularly cognitive decline, depression, and anxiety, although other factors have a considerable impact on this population. Cognitive decline is most common with the use of rst-generation ASMs. Therefore, rst-generation ASMs are rarely
4 Clinical Application ofAnti-seizure Medication asDrug Therapy
429
used in patients with brain tumors. Valproic acid is effective, but because it can cause blood-related side effects, these side effects may be compounded in patients receiving chemotherapy.
In general, current recommendations for ASM selection in BTRE patients are based on treatment recommendations for focal epilepsy. LEV or LTG are important treatment options for focal epilepsy. Although LTG itself is not an enzyme-inducing drug, its metabolism is affected by drugs that induce activity of the cytochrome P450-3A4 system. In addition to potential interactions with antitumor drugs, another disadvantage of LTG is that it can only be used as an oral formulation and can only be titrated slowly at the beginning of drug treatment. These two aspects are particu­larly relevant for patients with brain tumors in cases of decreased consciousness, difculty swallowing, and/or the need for immediate control of seizures. Levetiracetam and lacosamide (LCM) have advantages because they are widely used in oral liquid form and can be quickly titrated by intravenous injection.
Levetiracetam is currently the rst-line anti-seizure medication for many neuro­oncologists. In a recent article, levetiracetam was shown to be more effective than valproic acid despite some similar side effects [216]. However, levetiracetam carries an increased risk of psychiatric side effects. Conversely, some ASMs have bene­cial side effects, such as mood stabilization and anti-anxiety effects. Therefore, cli­nicians should carefully evaluate the psychological aspects before deciding on the most appropriate ASMs.
Lacosamide can be used as another anti-seizure medication option for the treat­ment of BTRE; it can be administered intravenously and has a fast titration rate, a low incidence of neuropsychiatric side effects, and few interactions with other drugs. Lacosamide has been shown to be effective in several trials of BTRE and can be used as a primary drug treatment [201]. A recent retrospective analysis of LCM monotherapy in 132 patients with primary brain tumors revealed that 64.4% of patients were seizure-free at 3 months, and 55% were seizure-free at 6months [217]. It is important to note that second-degree or higher atrioventricular block must be ruled out by electrocardiogram before starting LCM treatment.
The current study did not show that monotherapy is better than other additive treatments. In a small retrospective study, 33 patients with primary brain tumors received brivaracetam addition therapy, which reduced the number of monthly sei­zures from 7 to 2 [218]. Perampanel, a noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist, is of particular value due to its potential antitumor benets. In several small studies, 57% of patients receiving additive therapy achieved seizure control [219].
Current evidence suggests that PER is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment option for patients with BTRE.A retrospective analysis of the efcacy and safety of PER in BTRE included seven studies and six clinical trials of patients with varying tumor pathologies and study numbers. Eight to 36 patients with BTRE were enrolled and received PER addition therapy (mean dose 4–7mg/day). After 6–12months of follow-up, the response rate (50% reduction in seizure frequency) reached 75% in one study, and the seizure-free rate reached 94% in the other study. In terms of tolerability, 11–52% of patients experienced nonserious adverse events (most commonly dizziness, vertigo, anxiety, and irritability). Retention rates ranged
430
L. Zhou and Z. Chen
from 56–83%, with only 12.5% of patients discontinuing medication due to adverse events [127]. Studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted for the same tumor pathologies while evaluating the effects of PER on tumor progression, overall survival, and progression-free survival.
Approximately 60% of patients with brain tumors fail to achieve seizure-free status at the time of initial ASM therapy, and of these patients, only 40% eventually achieve seizure-free status after second-line monotherapy or multidrug therapy [220]. As a practical approach, if the rst ASM reduces seizure frequency but fails to completely control epilepsy, combination therapy is the preferred treatment option. If the rst ASM does not have any effect on seizure frequency, a second monotherapy should be started. Nonhepatic enzyme-induced anti-seizure medica­tion is preferred whenever possible. The combination of two ASMs with the same mechanism of action usually increases side effects.
Status Epilepticus: Among all adults with status epilepticus, 3–12% of cases are
caused by brain tumors. Patients with brain tumors are nearly three times more
likely to die from epilepsy than are those with general epilepsy. The appearance
of tumor-associated status epilepticus indicates tumor progression. A 2021 study
showed that the clinical manifestations of TASE were most common with focal
attacks (74%) and less common with generalized attacks (17%) [221]. First-line
therapies (diazepam, midazolam) and second-line therapies (levetiracetam, phe-
nytoin, valproic acid) should be used immediately for epileptic status in patients
with brain tumors. Withdrawal of ASM: There are limited data on the ability to withdraw/stop ASM
use in patients with brain tumors associated with epilepsy. To assess the risk of
recurrent seizures and to guide patients who wish to taper ASM use, risk calcula-
tors may be a valuable option; however, these calculators are not specically
designed for epilepsy patients with brain tumors [222]. These tools help physi-
cians determine the risk of relapse for individual patients; conversely, visualiza-
tion of specic percentages of seizure recurrence risk can sometimes help
convince patients for whom medication withdrawal is not appropriate to con-
tinue taking it.
Discontinuing ASM use in patients with gliomas is a controversial issue for which guidelines and expert consensus have not yet been reached. One study revealed that 71% of glioma patients with recurrent seizures within 6months after drug withdrawal [223].
ASMs should not be discontinued in patients who have experienced tumor pro­gression, who have highly malignant tumors, who have a short life expectancy, or who have had past seizures that were difcult to control. Discontinuation of ASM use is problematic for patients with few or no side effects, who may be well inte­grated into society and careers after brain tumor treatment, but who will have a heavy social burden if seizures relapse.
Discontinuation of ASM use is not recommended for patients at high risk of recurrent seizures, regardless of their duration; however, determining the risk of recurrent seizures is difcult because it is affected by a number of factors (such as