Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5203_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.4.3.1 Electrical Stimulation Kindling Model
- •1.4.2 Acute Epilepsy Models
- •1.4.2.1 Maximal Electroshock Seizure Model
- •1.4.2.3 Acute Pentylenetetrazol-Induced Seizure Model
- •1.4.2.4 Local Penicillin Model
- •1.4.3 Chronic Epilepsy Models
- •1.4.3.2 Kindling Model
- •1.4.3.3 Optogenetic Kindling Model
- •1.4.4 Poststatus Epilepticus Models
- •1.4.5 Genetic Models
- •1.4.5.1 Rodent Animal Models
- •Absence Seizure Models
- •1.4.5.2 Nonrodent Animal Models
- •Baboon Photosensitive Epilepsy Model
- •1.4.6.1 Posttraumatic Epilepsy Models
- •Fluid Percussion Injury Model
- •Controlled Cortical Impact Model
- •Impact Acceleration Model
- •1.4.6.2 Poststroke Epilepsy Models
- •1.4.6.3 Postinfection Epilepsy Models
- •1.5.1 Voltage-Gated Ion Channel Modulation Mechanism
- •1.5.1.1 Blocking Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels
- •1.5.1.2 Blocking Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels
- •1.5.1.3 Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel Enhancement
- •1.5.2 Blocking Excitatory Neurotransmission
- •1.5.4 Improving Neuronal GABAergic Inhibitory Function
- •1.5.4.3 Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
- •1.5.5 Other Mechanisms
- •1.5.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Commonly Used Antiseizure Medications
- •2.1.1 First-Generation Antiseizure Medications (ASMs)
- •2.1.1.1 Carbamazepine
- •Drug Characteristics
- •2.1.1.2 Clonazepam
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Other Studies
- •2.1.1.3 Ethosuximide
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Other Studies
- •2.1.1.4 Phenobarbital
- •Drug Characterization
- •2.1.1.5 Primidone
- •Drug Characteristics
- •2.1.1.6 Valproic Acid
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Mental Illness
- •Migraine Prevention
- •Ischemic Stroke
- •Tumors
- •Others
- •Hepatic Impairment
- •Hyperammonemia (HA)
- •Dyskinesia
- •Others
- •Summary
- •2.1.1.7 Phenytoin Sodium
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Other Research
- •2.1.1.8 Nitrazepam
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Other Studies
- •2.1.2 Second-Generation Antiseizure Drugs
- •2.1.2.1 Lamotrigine
- •General Characteristics
- •Historical Evolution
- •Adverse Effects
- •Cutaneous Adverse Effects
- •Hematological Adverse Effects
- •Cardiovascular Adverse Effects
- •Miscellaneous
- •Fundamental Research
- •2.1.2.2 Levetiracetam
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Preclinical Research
- •2.1.2.3 Topiramate
- •Topiramate-Related Adverse Reactions
- •2.1.2.4 Gabapentin
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Preclinical Research
- •2.1.2.5 Pregabalin
- •Drug Characteristics
- •2.1.2.6 Clobazam
- •Drug Characteristics
- •2.1.2.7 Felbamate
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Evidence-Based Medical Research Regarding Felbamate
- •Other Studies Involving Felbamate
- •2.1.2.8 Vigabatrin
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Historical Evolution
- •Evidence-Based Medical Research
- •Side Effects
- •Basic Research
- •Other Research
- •2.1.2.9 Zonisamide
- •Drug Characteristics
- •2.1.3 Third-Generation Antiseizure Medications
- •2.1.3.1 Lacosamide
- •Medicinal Features
- •Recent Fundamental Research
- •Adverse Effects
- •Serum Concentrations
- •2.1.3.2 Perampanel
- •Other Studies
- •2.1.3.3 Brivaracetam
- •Evidence-Based Medical Research
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Historical Development
- •Evidence-Based Medical Research
- •Basic Research
- •Other Research
- •2.1.3.5 Tiagabine (TGB)
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Historical Development
- •Evidence-Based Medical Research
- •Side Effects
- •Basic Research
- •Other Research
- •2.2 New Antiseizure Medications under Study
- •2.2.1 Cannabidiol
- •2.2.1.1 Drug Characteristics
- •References
- •3.1.4 Discontinue Anti-Seizure Medications
- •3.3.6 Pharmacokinetic Changes
- •3.4.1.1 Physiological Stage
- •3.4.1.2 Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Ovarian Axis
- •3.4.1.3 Menstrual Cycle
- •3.5.1 Introduction
- •3.5.5 Conclusions
- •3.6 Acute Symptomatic Epileptic Seizures
- •3.6.2 Historical Evolution
- •3.6.4 Epidemiological Investigation
- •3.6.5 Clinical Manifestations
- •3.6.6 Predictor
- •3.7.4.2 Serotonin Transferrin
- •3.7.4.3 Night Monitoring
- •3.7.4.4 Others
- •References
- •4.1.1.1 Focal Onset Seizures
- •4.1.1.2 Generalized-Onset Seizures
- •Generalized-Onset Tonic, Clonic, or Atonic Seizures
- •Generalized-Onset Myoclonic Seizures
- •Myoclonic-Atonic Seizures
- •Epileptic Spasms
- •Absence Seizures
- •4.2.3.1 Pretreatment Assessment
- •4.2.3.4 First-Line Anti-seizure Medications
- •4.3.1.2 Epidemiology
- •4.3.1.5 Drug Selection
- •4.3.2.2 Epidemiology
- •4.3.3.1 Epidemiology
- •4.3.3.2 Pathophysiological Mechanism
- •4.3.4.2 Pathologic Typing
- •Historical Evolution
- •Molecular Pathological Characterization
- •4.3.4.4 Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Glial Cell Dysfunction
- •Extrasynaptic Mechanisms
- •4.3.4.5 Treatment
- •Other Medications
- •4.3.5.1 Epidemiological Information.
- •4.3.5.2 Pathogenesis
- •4.3.5.3 Clinical Manifestations
- •4.3.5.4 Anti-seizure Medications
- •4.3.6.1 Rasmussen Encephalitis
- •4.3.6.2 Anti-GAD65-Associated Epilepsy
- •4.3.6.3 Paraneoplastic Antibody-Associated Epilepsy
- •4.3.7.1 Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.2 Metabolic Encephalopathy
- •Hepatic Encephalopathy
- •4.3.7.3 Uremic Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.4 Pulmonary Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.5 Autoimmune-Related Encephalopathy
- •Hashimoto’s Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •Lupus Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.6 Toxic Encephalopathy
- •Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •Chronic Alcoholic Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.7 Heroin-Induced Spongiform Leukoencephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.8 Radiation Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.8.1 Epidemiology
- •4.3.8.3 Anti-seizure Medication Selection
- •4.4.1.1 Historical Evolution
- •4.4.1.2 Epidemiology
- •4.4.1.5 Treatment
- •4.4.1.6 Prognosis
- •4.4.2.1 Historical Evolution
- •4.4.2.2 Epidemiological Investigation
- •Other Manifestations
- •4.4.2.6 Treatment
- •References

4 Clinical Application ofAnti-seizure Medication asDrug Therapy
421
[145]. Complications following cranial trauma, such as hypoxia, increased intracranial pressure, hypotension, ischemia, brain edema, intracranial hemorrhage, electrolyte imbalances, or infections, can precipitate symptomatic seizures, mostly
occurring within weeks after trauma [137, 140]. Additionally, alterations in inammatory markers, blood–brain barrier integrity, astrocytes, glucose metabolism, and
metabolic dysregulation have been implicated in the pathogenesis of posttraumatic
seizures [147–150]. For example, posttraumatic inammation triggers toll-like
receptor-1 (TLR-1) expression elevation in the hippocampi of rodent models, leading to protein kinase B (Akt) phosphorylation and activation of the nuclear factor
κB (NF-κB) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways [151]; HMBP-1
protein expression activates the MAPK/ERK 1/2 pathway [152]; and NMDA receptor activation increases neuronal excitability [153], among others.
Pathophysiological Mechanisms ofPosttraumatic Epilepsy
Research has suggested that an increased risk of delayed-onset seizures is associated with early-onset seizures; however, an increased risk of PTE is not a direct
consequence of early seizure activity [137, 140, 154]. Population-based studies ana-
lyzing large samples have shown that the increased risk of PTE following TBI may
be attributed to various factors, including the occurrence of cerebral contusion or
hematoma, particularly subdural hematomas and skull fractures, or age [140].
Cerebral contusions, lacerations resulting from direct or indirect traumatic brain
injury, and compression-induced brain trauma can evolve into epilepsy after a
period of asymptomatic latency, which can range from months to years and is
dependent on the individual [128]. Studies have indicated that following TBI,
injured brain tissue undergoes cellular apoptosis and long-term remodeling of neural circuits over time, including inhibition and apoptosis of GABAergic neurons and
enhanced excitability of glutamatergic neurons. Ultimately, these changes lead to an
imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters, increasing the risk
of spontaneous epileptic seizures [155–157]. There is also evidence suggesting that
the deposition of iron-containing hemosiderin, the formation of iron-free radicals,
and iron-related necrosis are involved in epileptogenesis [158]. Following the
advancement of genetic testing technologies, the role of genetics in PTE is gradually gaining attention, especially with the discovery of certain genes that serve as
biomarkers for predicting the occurrence of PTE following TBI.Genes such as
SLC1A3, SLC1A1, ADK, NT5E, IL1B, GAD1, MTHFR, ADORA1, and APOE
have been extensively reported to inuence various pathological and physiological
processes, including stress response, regulation of biomass, metabolic processes,
signaling pathways, responses to external stimuli and their regulation, and cellular
localization, among others, thus facilitating the onset of epilepsy [159]. The relationship between the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signaling pathway and
PTE is signicant. Changes of decreased GABAergic activity and increased glutamate content may be associated with microRNA regulation, indicating the involvement of epigenetic regulation in PTE [160]. Currently, mechanistic studies on

422
L. Zhou and Z. Chen
epilepsy are primarily based on animal experiments rather than specically targeting traumatic epilepsy. Animal models for studying PTE mainly include uid percussion models, controlled cortical impact models, liquid impact models, cortical
undercut models, impact acceleration models, penetrating brain injury models, and
canine models of PTE [157, 161–164]. Based on uid percussion model studies,
selective apoptosis of interneurons in the dentate gyrus and partial survival of mossy
bers may lead to sustained granule cell hyperexcitability [165]. Recent studies
have increasingly shown that a severe uid impact leading to focal TBI can trigger
spontaneous epileptic seizures [157, 166]. Seizures originate from the lesion site
and progress over time with worsening clinical and electrophysiological symptoms
[167, 168]. Controlled cortical impact models involve creating a focal brain contusion using an impactor controller, allowing for sustained or reproducible outcomes
without diffuse brain injury. Studies have shown that damage to the dentate gyrus
leads to mossy ber sprouting and structural reorganization, resulting in increased
spontaneous excitability [169, 170]. Rat models of penetrating brain injury better
simulate the conditions of TBI, but whether this model can produce delayed-onset
epileptic seizures remains uncertain [157]. The cortical undercut model involves
transverse transection of the white matter with a needle, resulting in isolation of a
small portion of the cortex, and monitoring seizure-like activity in brain slices.
Increased axonal sprouting adjacent to pyramidal cells is associated with increased
excitatory connections [171]. Recent studies have shown reduced GABA output
from fast-spiking neurons in the cortex [172]. Early application of tetrodotoxin after
trauma delays action potentials and prevents induced or noninduced epileptoid
activity in brain slices, suggesting that posttraumatic epilepsy can be an eventdependent process [173]. Administration of tetrodotoxin within 3days of trauma
can prevent delayed epilepsy in PTE animal models [174]. The occurrence of epileptogenesis overlaps with the recovery process after injury, suggesting common
underlying mechanisms, including neuroregeneration, axonal sprouting, and event
dependence [155]. Therefore, disease-modifying agents and anti-seizure drugs may
have both positive and negative effects on recovery and epileptogenicity. Limited
research suggests that anti-seizure drugs, including ramacemide, topiramate, piracetam, and levetiracetam, have no benecial or harmful effects on recovery following
TBI [155].
Risk Factors forPosttraumatic Seizures
Posttraumatic epilepsy has a signicant impact on quality of life due to its tendency
to occur following brain injury. Therefore, it is crucial to predict whether patients
will develop PTE after TBI.Current research indicates that several factors can serve
as risk factors for PTE, including TBI severity, intracranial hemorrhage, early posttraumatic seizures, age, and genetics [175].
① Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury: Studies have suggested that the risk of PTE
increases with TBI severity. TBI severity primarily depends on the duration of

4 Clinical Application ofAnti-seizure Medication asDrug Therapy
423
consciousness loss or amnesia and structural brain damage [137]. Mild TBI
refers to a lack of skull fractures or consciousness loss, or amnesia lasting
≤5minutes; moderate TBI involves skull fractures or other injuries, consciousness loss, or amnesia lasting 30min to 24 h without meeting the criteria for
severe TBI; severe TBI indicates evidence of cerebral contusion, intracerebral
hematoma, or consciousness loss or amnesia lasting more than 24h [137]. The
risks of developing PTE after mild, moderate, and severe TBI increase by 1.5,
2.9, and 17.2 times, respectively [137]. In 2017, the US Defense and Veterans
Brain Injury Center introduced new grading criteria for TBI severity, emphasizing the importance of imaging examinations while dening the duration of consciousness loss and posttraumatic amnesia [176].
② Intracranial Hemorrhage: Studies have indicated that traumatic intracranial
hemorrhage increases the risk of posttraumatic epilepsy by 30% [128].
③ Early Posttraumatic Seizures: Early posttraumatic seizures are associated with
PTE.After experiencing the rst delayed-onset nonprovoked seizure, 86% of
patients experience a second seizure within 2years, with the highest probability
observed in patients who have undergone focal brain trauma or coma for more
than 7days [140]. Studies have suggested that the correlation between them is
related to TBI severity. In mild TBI, early posttraumatic seizures do not increase
the risk of PTE, but in moderate and severe TBI, early posttraumatic seizures
increase the risk of PTE by 25% [128].
④ Age: Research has indicated that although children under 5years of age are more
likely to experience seizures within 1h of mild TBI, age cannot be used as a
predictor of delayed-onset seizures in children with TBI.Additionally, individuals over 65years of age are more likely to experience severe TBI, which is correlated with delayed-onset seizures [128].
⑤ Genetics: The role of genetics as a hereditary biomarker for posttraumatic epi-
lepsy has garnered considerable attention in recent years, leading to conicting
conclusions [159, 177]. However, with the continuous advancement of genetic
technologies and their gradual integration into clinical practice, genetic polymorphisms are promising biological markers.
4.3.2.4 Selection ofAnti-seizure Medications forPosttraumatic Seizures
andEpilepsy
① Drug Selection for Posttraumatic Seizures: Seizures following TBI are presumed
to be predominantly focal in nature, but seizures can easily generalize, presenting early as symptoms of generalized seizures within the rst week after TBI,
and early clinical seizures (electrical seizures) within the rst week are also very
common [127]. Studies have shown that 20% of posttraumatic seizures can progress to status epilepticus, especially in pediatric patients. Continuous EEG monitoring of patients with severe TBI has revealed that 22% of patients experience
seizures within the rst week, presenting as generalized tonic–clonic seizures or

424
L. Zhou and Z. Chen
myoclonus, with over 50% of patients having only EEG-detected electrical seizures [127].
Following the occurrence of the rst posttraumatic seizure, consideration
should be given to whether seizure prophylaxis should be initiated during the
acute phase. Because patients remain in the acute phase of TBI within the rst
week after TBI, management of the patient’s overall internal environment and
treatment of syndromes such as brain edema and brain contusion take precedence, while the use of ASMs for prophylaxis of acute-phase seizures following
TBI is controversial. The controversy revolves around whether ASMs can effectively prevent seizures during the acute phase and whether the side effects of
ASMs interfere with recovery after TBI.Meta-analyses have shown that phenytoin and carbamazepine have a preventive effect on early posttraumatic seizures. The Cochrane Database includes six studies demonstrating the prophylactic
effect of ASMs on early posttraumatic seizures. Among 100 TBI patients, 10
patients may not experience early posttraumatic seizures within 1week [178,
179]. However, studies have shown that controlling seizures is not associated
with reduced mortality or neurological disability, nor does it reduce the risk of
delayed-onset seizures.
Based on prospective research results, the American Neurological Association
has issued recommendations for the prophylactic use of ASMs in adult TBI
patients [180, 181]. The current recommendation is short-term use of phenytoin
sodium for prophylaxis in adult patients with severe TBI to prevent early posttraumatic seizures, while no recommendations are available for pediatric patients
with severe TBI.Phenytoin can be administered intravenously as early as possible after TBI, but data on this topic are limited. Levetiracetam can also be used
in similar circumstances, with several studies showing similar efcacy to that of
phenytoin and fewer side effects [171, 179, 182]. Although there are no guideline
recommendations, level-three evidence suggests that prophylactic use of phenytoin sodium reduces the risk of early posttraumatic seizures in pediatric
patients with severe TBI [183–185]. However, there is currently no evidence to
support the benet of using ASMs after 7days posttrauma [181]. Steroids used
after TBI do not prevent delayed-onset posttraumatic seizures, and early steroid
use has been shown to increase epileptic activity [186]. In 2017, the Chinese
Neurosurgical Society’s Neurotrauma Professional Group published the Expert
Consensus on the Prevention and Treatment of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy in
China, which also recommended anti-seizure prophylaxis for early seizure-like
events in high-risk populations after trauma. This expert consensus has been controversial; the controversy centers on whether the 7-day prophylactic use of
ASMs is intended to prevent seizures within 7days after trauma rather than preventing delayed-onset seizures after 7 days, although its target population
includes both early- and late-stage high-risk populations for posttraumatic seizures [187].
② Drug Selection for Posttraumatic Seizures: Currently, there are no international
guidelines recommending prophylactic drug treatment for delayed-onset posttraumatic seizures. Previous studies have shown that phenytoin and barbiturates

4 Clinical Application ofAnti-seizure Medication asDrug Therapy
425
are effective in preventing delayed-onset seizures after trauma [188]. Therefore,
it is common in clinical practice to prescribe medications to patients with severe
TBI or those who experienced posttraumatic seizures within 1week, with a medication duration of 6months or longer [189]. However, subsequent randomized,
double-blind, prospective evaluations of anti-seizure drugs, such as phenytoin,
phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and sodium valproate, have been shown to be
ineffective for preventing seizures [180, 190, 191].
Compared to patients who develop seizures more than a year after TBI,
patients who develop seizures within 1year after injury are more likely to achieve
seizure remission after medication [192]. However, studies have not demonstrated a relationship between the occurrence of the rst seizure and medication
efcacy [141]. Research has shown that a high seizure frequency in the rst year
can predict the severity of future seizures and the intractability to medication,
similar to other symptomatic seizures [141, 193]. Seizures that occur secondary
to severe traumatic brain injury and seizures subject to ineffective early treatment tend to be refractory to medication [194]. The probability of spontaneous
seizure remission is low, but for some selected patients (normal EEG, no imaging
lesions, good initial treatment response, no seizures for at least 2years), dose
reduction is feasible.
③ Development of New Anti-seizure Medications for Posttraumatic Seizures: In
recent years, with the deepening understanding of the mechanisms of PTE and
the use of animal models of PTE, there have been growing advancements in the
development of new anti-seizure drugs for the treatment of PTE.
Studies have shown that atipamezole, a selective α2-adrenergic receptor
antagonist, or the cannabinoid receptor 1 antagonist SR141716A has anti-seizure
effects on a lateral uid percussion brain injury seizure model in animals.
Treatment with atipamezole starting 7days after traumatic brain injury reduced
the susceptibility of pentylentetrazol-exposed rats to seizures in 14weeks after
treatment, but it did not prevent the development of seizures. SR141716A administered as a single dose 2minutes after traumatic brain injury or starting 30minutes after traumatic brain injury and continuing for 9 weeks, did not have
anti-seizure effects. Mechanistic studies have shown that the anti-seizure effect
of atipamezole is mainly mediated through its effects on α2-adrenergic receptor
subtypes, and animals carrying the Adra2A gene mutation encoding the N79P
amino acid substitution exhibit anti-seizure effects following traumatic brain
injury. On the other hand, the use of the receptor subtype-specic antagonist
ORM-12741 to block α
2c- adrenergic receptors did not improve the prognoses of
traumatic brain injury patients [195].
Studies have shown that Minozac, an anti-inammatory agent, can prevent
increased susceptibility to seizures in a “double hit” mouse model of closed skull
traumatic brain injury and electroshock-induced seizures, mainly by inhibiting the
upregulation of proinammatory cytokines [196].
Another study used an rpFPI rat model of lateral uid percussion injury to inves-
tigate whether brivaracetam could prevent and treat posttraumatic epilepsy. Three

426
months later, rats treated with brivaracetam starting 30minutes, 4h, and 8h after
traumatic brain injury showed a 38% reduction in the overall seizure occurrence
rate, a 59% reduction in seizure frequency, a 67% reduction in seizure duration, and
a 45% reduction in the proportion of spreading seizures, demonstrating good antiseizure properties and providing support for clinical trials of brivaracetam and other
SV2A-targeting drugs for the prevention of posttraumatic epilepsy in humans [197].
L. Zhou and Z. Chen
4.3.3 Selection ofAnti-seizure Medication forBrain
Tumor-Associated Epilepsy
Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a group of clinical symptoms caused by the
abnormal ring of neuronal cells around a lesion due to an intracranial tumor itself
or its occupying effect; these symptoms include changes in seizure consciousness
level, limb movements, limb sensations, autonomic nervous system functions, and
other disorders. According to the ILAE International Epilepsy Cause Classication
System updated by the ILAE in 2017, it is a structural cause. BTRE is a clinical
symptom of disease progression in patients with brain tumors and can appear either
at the beginning of the disease or after surgery, chemoradiotherapy, or other
treatments.
4.3.3.1 Epidemiology
The epidemiology, histological subtypes, clinical features, treatment, and outcomes
of malignant and nonmalignant CNS tumors are diverse and vary widely. The incidence of primary brain and other central nervous system tumors is estimated to be
23.8 per 100,000 people [198]. Malignant tumors account for 30% of central ner-
vous system tumors. Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults,
accounting for approximately 25% of the total incidence of tumors and approximately 80% of the incidence of malignant tumors of the central nervous system [199].
Epileptic seizures often occur in patients with brain tumors, usually reaching a
prevalence of 20–60%, and epileptic seizures can be the rst clinical symptom in
patients with low-grade gliomas [200]. Glioma is the most common primary brain
tumor in adults, and 40–70% of patients with glioma have one or more seizures during the course of the disease. When epilepsy recurs or even worsens in patients
whose brain tumors are actively treated, this may indicate that the tumor has progressed or relapsed, and it is also an important clinical indicator for determining
whether the survival and prognoses of brain tumor patients are optimistic.

4 Clinical Application ofAnti-seizure Medication asDrug Therapy
427
4.3.3.2 Pathophysiological Mechanism
The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of BTRE are not well understood.
Mechanical compression, tumor vascularization, oxygen demand imbalance,
inammatory processes and neurotransmitter imbalance play major roles in the
development of epilepsy in brain tumor patients [201].
Mechanical compression may cause ischemia and metabolic changes, followed
by disruption of the blood–brain barrier, leading to a greater risk of seizures. The
blood vessel supply of brain tumors is often unbalanced and unable to meet the
oxygen needs of the tumor and the peri-tumor area, resulting in tissue hypoxia; this,
in turn, leads to acidosis, glial swelling, and tissue damage. High-grade gliomas
cause hemorrhage, necrosis, and gliosis of the surrounding cortex due to their rapid
growth. These factors contribute to epilepsy in patients with brain tumors [202].
The incidence of seizures is inversely related to the rate of tumor growth, possibly because slow-growing tumors are more likely to present with epilepsy as the
rst symptom [203]. In low-grade gliomas, their slow growth into the surrounding
brain tissue can separate and invade the cortical–subcortical local and distal networks, leading to epileptogenesis. Changes in the balance of neurotransmitters lead
to epileptogenic generation of the tumor itself and tissues near the lesion, which
means that the “epileptogenic region” includes peritumoral tissues [204]. Therefore,
even complete removal of the brain tumor does not necessarily mean that the epileptogenic area is also removed, as BTRE may be produced by surrounding tissue.
The effect of neurotransmitter imbalance on the development of epilepsy in
BTRE patients, particularly a reduction in inhibitory GABAergic neurotransmission and an increase in excitatory glutamatergic synaptic input, has been demonstrated in multiple preclinical and clinical studies [205]. Studies have shown that
glioma and breast cancer BMSs can integrate into neuronal circuits. Gliomas can
form microtubules, which are thin tubes with membranes that resemble the axons
and dendritic growth of developing neurons. On the surfaces of these microtubules,
functional synapses (glial synapses) between neurons and glioma cells signal via
postsynaptic currents mediated by alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazol.
−4-propionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptors [206, 207]. The interaction
between neurons and brain tumor cells implies that seizures may promote brain
tumor progression and, conversely, that AMPA glutamate receptors are a potential
therapeutic target for treating tumors and BTRE [208]. AMPA receptor antagonist
drugs may have dual effects on reducing seizures and tumor growth.
It has been reported that the risk of seizures is greater for brain tumors located in
the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes [209] than for those located in the occipital
lobe. More than four brain metastatic sites; high-risk sites for metastasis, such as the
frontal, parietal, temporal, or occipital cortices; or melanoma as the primary tumor,
are risk factors for BTRE [210]. In low-grade gliomas, lesions involving the left
premotor area are more likely to develop into bilateral tonic–clonic seizures [203].

428
L. Zhou and Z. Chen
Among the molecular markers of great importance for treatment decisions in
brain glioma patients, isocitrate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 or 2 (IDH 1/2) is the
only known marker that has been reported to be associated with increased seizure
rates. Several clinical studies have shown that IDH 1/2 mutations increase the risk
of seizures before and around brain tumors [201]. IDH 1/2 mutation leads to a loss
of the ability of IDH to catalyze the conversion of isocitric acid to α-ketoglutaric
acid and further leads to an increase in the ability of IDH to catalyze the reduction
of α-ketoglutaric acid to 2-hydroxyglutaric acid. This mechanism leads to the accumulation of 2-hydroxyglutaric acid, which has structural similarities to glutamate
and is able to activate the NMDA receptor, thus acting as a glutamate agonist.
Higher glutamate levels lead to a greater probability of seizures. This activation
mechanism may explain the epileptogenic potential of IDH mutations.
4.3.3.3 Anti-seizure Medication Therapy forBrain
Tumor-Associated Epilepsy
① Primary Prevention of Epilepsy: Recent studies have shown that patients with
newly diagnosed brain tumors who have not experienced seizures do not benet
from anti-seizure medications [211]. Primary prevention is unlikely to be effec-
tive in improving progression-free survival or reducing the incidence of a rst
seizure within 6months of diagnosis. Therefore, prophylactic use of anti-seizure
medication is not recommended for patients with brain tumors who do not expe-
rience concomitant seizures [212].
② Secondary Prevention of Epilepsy: In patients with brain tumors, the occurrence
of the rst seizure indicates a diagnosis of epilepsy. Therefore, according to the
general recommendations of the ILAE, ASM treatment usually starts after the
rst seizure.
Currently, tumor histology, grade, location, and molecular markers have no inuence on ASM selection [213]. Several clinical studies have shown the antitumor
effects of valproic acid (VPA) and levetiracetam in patients with glioblastoma [201];
however, a comprehensive meta-analysis of four prospective trials did not conrm
this effect [214]. In vitro studies have shown that perampanel has good antitumor
activity, but it has not been found to slow tumor progression in rat models. There are
few clinical data on the potential antitumor activity of perampanel [215]. Currently,
therefore, ASMs for treatment of BTRE should be selected based on their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, tolerability, and side effects rather than
considering their possible antitumor effects. It is agreed that non-enzyme-induced
ASMs are superior to enzyme-induced ASMs to avoid changes that interfere with
the pharmacokinetics of antitumor drugs and other drugs (e.g., dexamethasone).
Patients with brain tumors are susceptible to the neurological side effects of
ASM, particularly cognitive decline, depression, and anxiety, although other factors
have a considerable impact on this population. Cognitive decline is most common
with the use of rst-generation ASMs. Therefore, rst-generation ASMs are rarely

4 Clinical Application ofAnti-seizure Medication asDrug Therapy
429
used in patients with brain tumors. Valproic acid is effective, but because it can
cause blood-related side effects, these side effects may be compounded in patients
receiving chemotherapy.
In general, current recommendations for ASM selection in BTRE patients are
based on treatment recommendations for focal epilepsy. LEV or LTG are important
treatment options for focal epilepsy. Although LTG itself is not an enzyme-inducing
drug, its metabolism is affected by drugs that induce activity of the cytochrome
P450-3A4 system. In addition to potential interactions with antitumor drugs, another
disadvantage of LTG is that it can only be used as an oral formulation and can only
be titrated slowly at the beginning of drug treatment. These two aspects are particularly relevant for patients with brain tumors in cases of decreased consciousness,
difculty swallowing, and/or the need for immediate control of seizures.
Levetiracetam and lacosamide (LCM) have advantages because they are widely
used in oral liquid form and can be quickly titrated by intravenous injection.
Levetiracetam is currently the rst-line anti-seizure medication for many neurooncologists. In a recent article, levetiracetam was shown to be more effective than
valproic acid despite some similar side effects [216]. However, levetiracetam carries
an increased risk of psychiatric side effects. Conversely, some ASMs have benecial side effects, such as mood stabilization and anti-anxiety effects. Therefore, clinicians should carefully evaluate the psychological aspects before deciding on the
most appropriate ASMs.
Lacosamide can be used as another anti-seizure medication option for the treatment of BTRE; it can be administered intravenously and has a fast titration rate, a
low incidence of neuropsychiatric side effects, and few interactions with other
drugs. Lacosamide has been shown to be effective in several trials of BTRE and can
be used as a primary drug treatment [201]. A recent retrospective analysis of LCM
monotherapy in 132 patients with primary brain tumors revealed that 64.4% of
patients were seizure-free at 3 months, and 55% were seizure-free at 6months
[217]. It is important to note that second-degree or higher atrioventricular block
must be ruled out by electrocardiogram before starting LCM treatment.
The current study did not show that monotherapy is better than other additive
treatments. In a small retrospective study, 33 patients with primary brain tumors
received brivaracetam addition therapy, which reduced the number of monthly seizures from 7 to 2 [218]. Perampanel, a noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist,
is of particular value due to its potential antitumor benets. In several small studies,
57% of patients receiving additive therapy achieved seizure control [219].
Current evidence suggests that PER is an effective and generally well-tolerated
treatment option for patients with BTRE.A retrospective analysis of the efcacy
and safety of PER in BTRE included seven studies and six clinical trials of patients
with varying tumor pathologies and study numbers. Eight to 36 patients with BTRE
were enrolled and received PER addition therapy (mean dose 4–7mg/day). After
6–12months of follow-up, the response rate (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency)
reached 75% in one study, and the seizure-free rate reached 94% in the other study.
In terms of tolerability, 11–52% of patients experienced nonserious adverse events
(most commonly dizziness, vertigo, anxiety, and irritability). Retention rates ranged

430
L. Zhou and Z. Chen
from 56–83%, with only 12.5% of patients discontinuing medication due to adverse
events [127]. Studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted for the same
tumor pathologies while evaluating the effects of PER on tumor progression, overall
survival, and progression-free survival.
Approximately 60% of patients with brain tumors fail to achieve seizure-free
status at the time of initial ASM therapy, and of these patients, only 40% eventually
achieve seizure-free status after second-line monotherapy or multidrug therapy
[220]. As a practical approach, if the rst ASM reduces seizure frequency but fails
to completely control epilepsy, combination therapy is the preferred treatment
option. If the rst ASM does not have any effect on seizure frequency, a second
monotherapy should be started. Nonhepatic enzyme-induced anti-seizure medication is preferred whenever possible. The combination of two ASMs with the same
mechanism of action usually increases side effects.
③ Status Epilepticus: Among all adults with status epilepticus, 3–12% of cases are
caused by brain tumors. Patients with brain tumors are nearly three times more
likely to die from epilepsy than are those with general epilepsy. The appearance
of tumor-associated status epilepticus indicates tumor progression. A 2021 study
showed that the clinical manifestations of TASE were most common with focal
attacks (74%) and less common with generalized attacks (17%) [221]. First-line
therapies (diazepam, midazolam) and second-line therapies (levetiracetam, phe-
nytoin, valproic acid) should be used immediately for epileptic status in patients
with brain tumors.
④ Withdrawal of ASM: There are limited data on the ability to withdraw/stop ASM
use in patients with brain tumors associated with epilepsy. To assess the risk of
recurrent seizures and to guide patients who wish to taper ASM use, risk calcula-
tors may be a valuable option; however, these calculators are not specically
designed for epilepsy patients with brain tumors [222]. These tools help physi-
cians determine the risk of relapse for individual patients; conversely, visualiza-
tion of specic percentages of seizure recurrence risk can sometimes help
convince patients for whom medication withdrawal is not appropriate to con-
tinue taking it.
Discontinuing ASM use in patients with gliomas is a controversial issue for
which guidelines and expert consensus have not yet been reached. One study
revealed that 71% of glioma patients with recurrent seizures within 6months after
drug withdrawal [223].
ASMs should not be discontinued in patients who have experienced tumor progression, who have highly malignant tumors, who have a short life expectancy, or
who have had past seizures that were difcult to control. Discontinuation of ASM
use is problematic for patients with few or no side effects, who may be well integrated into society and careers after brain tumor treatment, but who will have a
heavy social burden if seizures relapse.
Discontinuation of ASM use is not recommended for patients at high risk of
recurrent seizures, regardless of their duration; however, determining the risk of
recurrent seizures is difcult because it is affected by a number of factors (such as
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
